Reaching the LVOT: You take the high road and I'll take the low

The myocardium surrounding the coronary cusps is a common site of origin for ventricular arrhythmias (VA) both idiopathic and due to cardiomyopathy. The coronary cusps may also serve as a vantage point for ablation of the left ventricular summit and sites adjacent to the proximal conduction system.^1,2 Supravalvular and infravalvular approaches to ablation in this region are commonplace and are typically utilized based on operator preference and proximity to site of earliest activation.³ While limited case series indicate that supravalvular ablation is safe and potentially effective, no data exist to assess the impact of intervening coronary cusp tissue on the biophysics of radiofrequency (RF) ablation.⁴ ventricular arrhythmias This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Assessment of an ECG-Based System for Localizing Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Structural Heart Disease

Background

We have previously developed an intraprocedural automatic arrhythmia‐origin localization (AAOL) system to identify idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia origins in real time using a 3‐lead ECG. The objective was to assess the localization accuracy of ventricular tachycardia (VT) exit and premature ventricular contraction (PVC) origin sites in patients with structural heart disease using the AAOL system.

Methods and Results

In retrospective and prospective case series studies, a total of 42 patients who underwent VT/PVC ablation in the setting of structural heart disease were recruited at 2 different centers. The AAOL system combines 120‐ms QRS integrals of 3 leads (III, V2, V6) with pace mapping to predict VT exit/PVC origin site and projects that site onto the patient‐specific electroanatomic mapping surface. VT exit/PVC origin sites were clinically identified by activation mapping and/or pace mapping. The localization error of the VT exit/PVC origin site was assessed by the distance between the clinically identified site and the estimated site. In the retrospective study of 19 patients with structural heart disease, the AAOL system achieved a mean localization accuracy of 6.5±2.6 mm for 25 induced VTs. In the prospective study with 23 patients, mean localization accuracy was 5.9±2.6 mm for 26 VT exit and PVC origin sites. There was no difference in mean localization error in epicardial sites compared with endocardial sites using the AAOL system (6.0 versus 5.8 mm, P=0.895).

Conclusions

The AAOL system achieved accurate localization of VT exit/PVC origin sites in patients with structural heart disease; its performance is superior to current systems, and thus, it promises to have potential clinical utility.

Feasibility study shows concordance between image-based virtual-heart ablation targets and predicted ECG-based arrhythmia exit-sites

INTRODUCTION

We recently developed two noninvasive methodologies to help guide VT ablation: population-derived automated VT exit localization (PAVEL) and virtual-heart arrhythmia ablation targeting (VAAT). We hypothesized that while very different in their nature, limitations, and type of ablation targets (substrate-based vs. clinical VT), the image-based VAAT and the ECG-based PAVEL technologies would be spatially concordant in their predictions.

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to test this hypothesis in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients in a retrospective feasibility study.

METHODS

Four post-infarct patients who underwent LV VT ablation and had pre-procedural LGE-CMRs were enrolled. Virtual hearts with patient-specific scar and border zone identified potential VTs and ablation targets. Patient-specific PAVEL based on a population-derived statistical method localized VT exit sites onto a patient-specific 238-triangle LV endocardial surface.

RESULTS

Ten induced VTs were analyzed and 9-exit sites were localized by PAVEL onto the patient-specific LV endocardial surface. All nine predicted VT exit sites were in the scar border zone defined by voltage mapping and spatially correlated with successful clinical lesions. There were 2.3 ± 1.9 VTs per patient in the models. All five VAAT lesions fell within regions ablated clinically. VAAT targets correlated well with 6 PAVEL-predicted VT exit sites. The distance between the center of the predicted VT-exit-site triangle and nearest corresponding VAAT ablation lesion was 10.7 ± 7.3 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

VAAT targets are concordant with the patient-specific PAVEL-predicted VT exit sites. These findings support investigation into combining these two complementary technologies as a noninvasive, clinical tool for targeting clinically induced VTs and regions likely to harbor potential VTs.