[Effect of a multimodal pain management protocol and age on wound healing after thermal disbudding of female German Holstein calves]

INTRODUCTION

Hot-iron disbudding of calves is a stressful and painful procedure and leaves a burn wound. Pain management procedures and the effects of hot-iron disbudding on biochemical markers of pain perception and stress response have been widely investigated in recent years. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential effects of pain management and age of the calf on the healing of burn wounds caused by disbudding. 327 healthy female German Holstein calves were included in this randomised, triple-blinded, prospective study. Calves were either disbudded at the age of four to 10 or 15 to 28 days using a gas-powered hot iron. Each calf was randomly allocated to one of nine possible treatment groups (BG). All calves received either the active ingredients to be tested (xylazine hydrochloride with 0.2 or 0.05 mg / kg body mass (BM) intramuscular for sedation, procaine hydrochloride (2 %) each 8 ml locally on both sides subcutaneously (SC) to the cornual nerves, meloxicam with 0,5 mg / kg BM SC for anti-inflammatory purposes) or an identical amount of saline solution (placebo). Calves in the group `thermE` and `ScheinE` received only placebo. In group `ScheinE` disbudding was simulated and in `thermE` it was carried out. The calves were clinically monitored starting one day before and ending 28 days after the procedure and the burn wounds were assessed. Both the rectal temperature and parameters of wound healing changed significantly during the study period and had characteristic profiles over time. Wound healing was not influenced by the different analgesic protocols, indicating that a multimodal analgesia does not pose a risk for wound healing after thermal disbudding. There were no observed differences between the age groups. The results of this study show, that disbudding of young calves and a multimodal pain management protocol does not affect wound healing in calves.

[Evaluation of voluntary incentive--based animal welfare programs to decrease antimicrobial use on source dairies and veal calf fattening operations]

INTRODUCTION

Increased antimicrobial use (AMU) and poor animal health are common problems on Swiss veal farms. The creation of incentive systems could contribute to reduce AMU and to implement supportive management measures. Voluntary government-funded programs could be an option. Therefore, the present study developed four hypothetical programs, which differed in their approach and funded measures. Depending on the program, the objective of reducing AMU should be achieved either by promotion of farm specific advice from the Swiss calf health service, benchmarking the antibiotic use, promotion of health measures on the source dairy (farm of birth) or by promoting veal calf fattening on the source dairy instead of selling calf to fattening operations. A survey using the contingent evaluation method evaluated the willingness of farm manager to participate in these programs. A total of 135 veal farm managers filled in the questionnaire, of which 131 were managers of family-run small scale veal fattening farms. In addition, 309 managers of dairy farms where no veal was produced participated in the study. These farms served as source dairies and sold excess calves for subsequent fattening mostly at the age of three to five weeks. Participation was moderate to good depending on the program. Approximately 30% of farm managers would participate in the program with farm specific advice from the Swiss calf health service and with benchmarking of AMU, 35% in the promotion of veal calf fattening on the source dairy, and 60% in health measures on the source dairy. Probability of participation in the program with farm specific advice and in health measures on source dairies can be influenced by the amount of the extra pay. The main reasons for which managers would not want to participate were having reservations about the need to improve animal health on the own farm, a lack of space and time, as well as concerns about increased administrative work. The study can be a starting point for the development of voluntary programs to reduce AMU on farms, in particular on source dairies and veal calf fattening farms. The results of this study may allow of estimation of the percentage of farm managers to participate in voluntary programs, thus addressing an optimal number of farms.

[Economic importance of antibiotic sale for private food animal practices in Switzerland - example veal production]

INTRODUCTION

The use of antibiotics in Swiss veal production is considered an established method for controlling bacterial infectious diseases. Although the veterinary profession aims to ensure animal welfare, the veterinary business income needs to be ensured at the same time. Against the background of increasing problems with resistant pathogens in human and veterinary medicine, the use of antibiotics should be significantly reduced and used more selectively. The associated economic consequences for food animal practitioners are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the economic importance of antibiotic sale volume for private food animal practitioners in veal production. An anonymized questionnaire was sent to 120 mixed veterinary practices in Switzerland, which offered services to veal and beef cattle farmers. Questions involved the pharmaceutical sale volume, details on veterinary invoices from three farms with average, below and above average animal health throughout 2017. Twenty-nine complete questionnaires (response rate: 24.2%) and veterinary invoices of 84 farms were returned. The study is not representative, but it allows a rough assessment of the economic framework in Swiss livestock practice. The majority of the total turnover with livestock farms was generated by the sale of antibiotics (54%). Antibiotic sales per animal were higher as expected in farms with a below-average animal health than in farms with an average or above-average animal health. Consulting services turnover contributed only 0.5% to the total sale volume in veal farming. The results document, that antibiotic reduction measurements in veal and beef production will have economic consequences for veterinary livestock practices. In the medium term, the profitable existence of livestock veterinary practice requires a change to cost based consulting services.