Impella-Induced Incessant Ventricular Tachycardia

Background: The Impella 2.5 and Impella Cardiac Power (CP) devices (ABIOMED) are used to provide mechanical circulatory support for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions or cardiogenic shock as a bridge to recovery or destination therapy. The Impella device has shown both efficacy and safety in patients presenting with cardiogenic shock. Performing clinical and hemodynamic assessments of patients presenting with cardiogenic shock is an important step to determine if mechanical circulatory support with an Impella device is indicated. Case Report: A 62-year-old male presented with cardiogenic shock requiring Impella device support. Two days later, the patient developed incessant ventricular tachycardia. Transthoracic echocardiography showed that the Impella device had migrated out of the ventricular cavity. Once the position of the Impella device was adjusted, ventricular tachycardia immediately resolved. Conclusion: Our case emphasizes the importance of using imaging modalities such as transthoracic echocardiography to ensure correct positioning of an Impella device in the left ventricle to avoid complications.

Using the Minimally Invasive Impella 5.0 via the Right Subclavian Artery Cutdown for Acute on Chronic Decompensated Heart Failure as a Bridge to Decision

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of traditional mechanical support paradigms (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, intraaortic balloon pump [IABP], and permanent left ventricular assist device [LVAD]) in acute decompensated heart failure have generally been suboptimal. Novel approaches, such as minimally invasive LVAD therapy (Impella 5.0 device), promise less invasive but equivalent hemodynamic support. However, it is yet unknown whether the outcomes with such devices support widespread acceptance of this new technology. We recently started utilizing the right subclavian artery (RSA) for Impella 5.0 implantation and report our early experience and outcomes with this novel approach.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review was performed of 24 patients with acute on chronic decompensated heart failure who received the Impella 5.0 via the RSA from June 2011 to May 2014. The device was implanted via a cutdown through an 8-mm vascular graft sewn to the RSA. The device was positioned with fluoroscopy and transesophageal echocardiography.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 51.29 years, and 75% were male. At implantation, all patients were mechanically ventilated on at least 2 inotropes with persistent cardiogenic shock, and 17 (70.8%) were on IABP support. Postimplantation, 21 (87.5%) tolerated extubation, and all 17 of the patients with IABPs tolerated discontinuation of IABP support. The reduction in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score preimplantation vs postimplantation was statistically significant (21.17 vs 14.88, P=0.0014), suggesting improvement in end organ function. A significant decrease was also seen in creatinine levels before and after implantation (2.17 mg/dL vs 1.50 mg/dL, P=0.0043). The endpoint of support included recovery in 6 patients (25.0%), permanent LVAD in 9 (37.5%), and heart transplantation in 2 (8.3%). Death occurred in 7 patients (29.2%) as a result of multisystem organ failure, infection, or patient withdrawal of care.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive LVAD therapy using the Impella 5.0 via the RSA cutdown is an attractive option in acute on chronic decompensated heart failure. Improvement in end organ function allows for transition to recovery or to advanced surgical therapies such as permanent LVAD and heart transplantation. Significant advantages to this approach include improved left ventricular unloading, lower anticoagulation need, and the potential for ambulation and physical therapy.

Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices: A Novel Approach in the Management of Patients With Acute Cardiogenic Shock

BACKGROUND

Despite recent advances in the management of heart failure, cardiogenic shock remains a challenging and devastating condition with significant morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

We review currently available percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices and address each device's characteristics, mechanism of action, specific clinical indications, and contraindications.

RESULTS

Four types of percutaneous MCS devices are currently available: the intraaortic balloon pump (IABP), Impella devices, the TandemHeart, and extracorporal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). IABPs provide less hemodynamic support compared to the Impella, TandemHeart, and ECMO devices. However, because of its ease of placement and relatively small access catheter size, the IABP remains the most commonly used MCS device for the treatment of cardiogenic shock. When full cardiopulmonary support is needed, ECMO is the best option.

CONCLUSION

Temporary MCS has emerged as a therapeutic option in the management of patients with acute cardiogenic shock. However, clinician familiarity with the indications, limitations, and benefits of individual MCS devices and enhanced patient comfort with the placement are paramount to improve patient outcomes.