A comparison of novel silicone plate vs. auricular cartilage in upper eyelid reconstruction following excision of malignant tumor

Purpose: To compare surgical and functional outcomes, safety, efficacy and cost of silicone plate vs. autogenous auricular cartilage (AAC) as alternate material to tarsal plate for upper eyelid reconstruction after excision of malignant tumor. Methods: A prospective, comparative, interventional study of over 3 years was conducted on two groups of twenty patients each. All the patients had undergone the Modified Cutler Beard procedure with AAC being used as tarsal substitute in one group and a novel silicone plate in the other. Post-operative MRD 1, LPS action, Central Lid Thickness, and Lid contour were recorded at one week, one month and six months follow-up. Results: The pre-operative MRD 1 in the silicone plate and AAC group was -2.95 ± 1.19 mm and -3.05 ± 1(1).05 mm, post-operative in the silicone plate group 3.8 ± 0.4 mm, and in the AAC group, 3.8 ± 0.41 mm. The pre-operative LPS action in the silicone plate and AAC group was 1.2 ± 1.1 mm and 1.0 ± 0.9 mm and post-operative it was 13.8 ± 0.4 mm for the silicone plate group and 13.7 ± 0.4 mm for the AAC group. The post-operative lid thickness for the silicone plate group was 4.4 ± 0.17 mm and for the AAC group it was 4.4 ± 0.08 mm. Conclusion: The cosmetic outcome in terms of lid contour maintenance is better in the silicone plate group, in which it markedly reduces the surgical time, provides earlier rehabilitation, and eliminates disease transmission. Harvesting of AAC is a skillful and time-consuming procedure and adds to the post-operative morbidity due to the presence of a second surgical site. The low manufacturing cost of silicone plate as opposed to other allogenic and synthetic tarsal substitutes makes it readily available to resource limited populations. The silicone plate is reckoned to become the material of choice as tarsal substitute in the future. Abbreviations: AAC = Autogenous auricular cartilage, MRD-1 = Margin reflex distance-1, LPS = levator palpebrae superioris, PFH = palpebral fissure height.

Total or subtotal replacement of tarsal plate by novel silicone plate for upper eyelid reconstruction in malignant tumors

Purpose

: To evaluate the cost, safety, surgical outcome, and efficacy of modified Cutler-Beard eyelid reconstruction utilizing a novel silicone plate as a tarsal plate replacement in the repair of 60% to 100% eyelid defects following the excision of large malignant tumors.

Methods

: A prospective, noncomparative, interventional study of 30 eyes was done over 3 years. Fourteen patients were female, and 16 patients were male. In all the cases, a silicone plate, the synthetic, artificial tarsal plate, was utilized for a total or subtotal replacement of the tarsal plate. The created defect was measured in mm (length and width) and later expressed in percentage. Pre- and postoperative action of levator palpebrae superioris (LPS) was measured. Pre- and postoperative measurements of the margin-to-margin reflex distance (MRD1) were noted.

Results

: Preoperative LPS action was 1.23 ± 1.35 mm, whereas postoperative LPS actions at the end of 1 week and 18 months were 11. 8 ± 0.88 mm and 13.53 ± 0. 73 mm, respectively. Preoperative MRD1 was - 3.0 ± 1.144 mm, whereas postoperative MRD1 values at the end of 1 week and 18 months were 2.18 ± 0.27 mm and 4.16 mm ± 0.35, respectively. The mean created defect after the removal of the tumor was 87.3% ±11.10. The mean length of the silicone plate implanted in this study was 27.53 ± 2.48 mm. The follow-up period for the study participants was 18 months.

Conclusion

: The synthetic novel silicone plate was successful as a tarsal plate replacement. A second surgical site for ear cartilage harvesting is avoided. Cadaver transfer of Achilles tendon carries the risk of transmission of communicable diseases, for example, hepatitis B and HIV. Silicone is an inert, nonreacting, and tissue-tested material, thus eliminating the possibility of graft rejection. This material is readily available and cost-effective. The novel silicone plate is considered to be the most promising alternative material as a tarsal replacement in the future generation.