Comparative study of each surgical step in radical prostatectomy under 3D and 2D laparoscopy

Objective

Comparing the specific advantages and surgical outcomes of each step in radical prostatectomy under 3D vs. 2D laparoscopy.

Methods

From October 2019 to January 2023, our urology department treated 63 cases of prostate cancer, using an odd-even arrangement method to divide into two groups. This is a non-randomized prospective study, with 33 odd-numbered cases in the 3D group and 30 even-numbered cases in the 2D group. The surgery was divided into four steps: (1) establishing an extraperitoneal pneumoperitoneum (2) pelvic lymph node dissection (3)excising the prostate (4)bladder-urethral anastomosis, comparing the two groups in terms of surgical time, blood loss, and relevant postoperative indicators for each step.

Results

All 63 surgeries were successfully completed without any conversions. Comparing 3D and 2D laparoscopy groups, there were statistically significant differences in total surgery time (123.5 ± 15.3 min vs. 145.6 ± 17.2 min, P < 0.05), total blood loss (198.3 ± 18.4 ml vs. 243.1 ± 20.1 ml, P < 0.05), prostate excision time (55.1 ± 8.4 min vs. 67.2 ± 9.3 min, P < 0.05) and blood loss (101.6 ± 12.2 ml vs. 123.8 ± 14.1 ml, P < 0.05), bladder-urethral anastomosis time (30.5 ± 4.3 min vs. 37.6 ± 5.1 min, P < 0.05) and blood loss (62.7 ± 9.7 ml vs. 82.5 ± 8.2 ml, P < 0.05). There were no statistical differences in the time and blood loss during the establishment of extraperitoneal pneumoperitoneum and the cleaning of pelvic lymph nodes (P > 0.05). In terms of urinary incontinence rates, the 3D laparoscopy group was lower than the 2D group, and in terms of preserving erectile function, the 3D group was higher than the 2D group, with significant statistical differences (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of postoperative drainage days, hospitalization days, hospitalization costs, time of catheter removaland positive margin rates (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared to traditional 2D laparoscopy, 3D laparoscopy can shorten the operation time and reduce bleeding in the steps of prostate excision and bladder-urethral anastomosis, but there was no significant difference in peri-operative outcomes.

Best Evidence for Each Surgical Step in Minimally Invasive Right Hemicolectomy: A Systematic Review

Objective

The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature for each surgical step of the minimally invasive right hemicolectomy (MIRH) for non-locally advanced colon cancer, to define the most optimal procedure with the highest level of evidence.

Background

High variability exists in the way MIRH is performed between surgeons and hospitals, which could affect patients' postoperative and oncological outcomes.

Methods

A systematic search using PubMed was performed to first identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and if there were none then landmark papers and consensus statements were systematically searched for each key step of MIRH. Systematic reviews were assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool, and selection was based on highest quality followed by year of publication.

Results

Low (less than 12 mmHg) intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) gives higher mean quality of recovery compared to standard IAP. Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is associated with lowest recurrence and highest 5-year overall survival rates, without worsening short-term outcomes. Routine D3 versus D2 lymphadenectomy showed higher LN yield, but more vascular injuries, and no difference in overall and disease-free survival. Intracorporeal anastomosis is associated with better intra- and postoperative outcomes. The Pfannenstiel incision gives the lowest chance of incisional hernias compared to all other extraction sites.

Conclusion

According to the best available evidence, the most optimal MIRH for colon cancer without clinically involved D3 nodes entails at least low IAP, CME with D2 lymphadenectomy, an intracorporeal anastomosis and specimen extraction through a Pfannenstiel incision.

Process Mapping Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Instrument Designs

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is commonly performed with proprietary, manual instrumentation provided by the surgical implant manufacturer. Registry studies and meta-analysis, with few outliers, have consistently shown similar functional outcomes and implant survival after TKA regardless of implant manufacturer, implant design, or surgical technique. We hypothesized that process mapping could identify areas for improvement in TKA instrumentation.

METHODS

Seventeen TKA implant systems from 10 companies representing over 90% of all TKAs performed in the United States were evaluated. Instrumentation required for femoral, tibial, and patellar preparation was compared. The number of steps including surgical technician assembly steps, instrument handoffs, and surgeon steps were tabulated based off application of a standardized surgical flow, adjusted for manufacturer-recommended steps during completion of a TKA operation.

RESULTS

Cruciate-retaining (CR) knee instrumentation in studied systems required 158-225 discrete steps and posterior-stabilized (PS) knees required 181-230 steps. With the fewest steps for femoral, tibial, and patellar instrumentation, CR and PS knee systems could be improved to 145 and 163 steps, respectively. The Arthrex iBalance and the Biomet Vanguard Microplasty required fewest steps among CR systems; the OrthoDevelopment Balanced and the Corin Unity required fewest steps among PS systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Process mapping identified potential areas for improved instrumentation in all studied systems, suggesting the possibility to reduce operative steps broadly across the TKA industry. Patient outcomes were not evaluated by system. Future implant system design changes may do well to reduce unnecessary steps and instrumentation.

Surgical steps of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Part 1: Benign disease by the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE)1

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic hysterectomy, which is associated with well-documented benefits compared to an abdominal approach, should be the surgical treatment choice for certain gynaecological conditions. The aim of this document is to provide recommendations on the technical aspects of this procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) has established a working group with the goal of standardizing the surgical steps of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease, which is one of the most commonly performed major surgical procedures in Gynaecology.

RESULTS

A properly equipped surgical theatre and the correct positioning of both the laparoscopic tower and the surgeons are of utmost importance and insure that the surgical procedure can be performed uneventfully.The incorporation of standardized surgical steps in routine practice should help to ensure an optimal surgical outcome based on the available scientific evidence as reviewed by expert surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

The description of the surgical steps of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and its adoption by minimally invasive gynaecologists will make this approach safer.

Elbow vascularized composite allotransplantation-surgical anatomy and technique

BACKGROUND

Elbow reconstruction with vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) may hold promise in treating end-stage arthritis as no current treatment is both functional and durable. We describe the vascular and gross anatomy of the elbow in the context of VCA procurement and propose a step-by-step surgical technique for human elbow VCA.

METHODS

We injected latex in the arterial tree of 16 fresh adult cadaveric upper extremities. We identified and measured arteries and nerves and their branch points relative to the medial epicondyle. Based on our determination of the dominant blood supply to osseous and capsular elbow structures, we derived a cadaveric model of elbow VCA by performing donor preparation on 2 fresh cadaveric upper extremities by elevating a lateral arm flap in conjunction with the vascularized elbow joint. We prepared and transplanted 2 size-matched recipient specimens to refine the surgical technique.

RESULTS

The elbow arterial supply was composed of consistent branches contributing to medial, lateral, and posterior arcades. Preservation of the elbow arterial network requires sectioning of the brachial, radial, and ulnar arteries 12 cm proximal, 1 cm distal, and 6 cm distal to the ulnar artery takeoff, respectively. The supinator, anconeus, distal brachialis, proximal aspects of the flexor digitorum profundus, and flexor carpi ulnaris must be preserved to protect osseous perforators. Articular innervation was most commonly derived from ulnar and median nerve branches. We refined our proposed surgical technique after performing 2 cadaveric elbow VCAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Elbow VCA may be technically feasible on the basis of its consistent vascular anatomy and our proposed surgical technique.