Comparison of robotic versus thoracoscopic repair for congenital esophageal atresia: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite the rapid advancement of robotic surgery across various surgical domains, only cases of robotic repair (RR) for neonates with esophageal atresia (EA) have been reported. Comprehensive studies comparing RR and thoracoscopic repair (TR) are lacking. The authors aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of RR and TR for EA.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter study was conducted on 155 EA neonates undergoing RR (79 patients) or TR (76 patients) between August 2020 and February 2023 using propensity score matching. Asymmetric port distribution and step-trocar insertion techniques were applied during RR. Demographics and surgical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

After matching, 63 patients (out of 79) in RR group and 63 patients (out of 76) in TR group were included. There were no significant differences in short-term outcomes between two groups, except for longer total operative time (173.81 vs. 160.54 min; P <0.001) and shorter anastomotic time (29.52 vs. 40.21 min; P <0.001) in RR group. Compared with TR group, the RR group had older age at surgery (8.00 vs. 3.00 days; P <0.001), but a comparable pneumonia rate. More importantly, the incidence of anastomotic leakage (4.76 vs. 19.05%, P =0.013), anastomotic stricture (15.87 vs. 31.74%, P =0.036) within 1 year postoperatively, and unplanned readmission (32.26 vs. 60.00%, P =0.030) within 2 years postoperatively were lower in RR group than in TR group.

CONCLUSIONS

RR is a technically safe and effective option for EA patients. This approach delays the age of surgery without increasing respiratory complication rates while reducing the incidence of postoperative anastomotic complications and unplanned readmission.

Thoracoscopic Versus Open Repair of Esophageal Atresia: A Systematic Review of Surgical Outcomes

Introduction: Esophageal atresia (EA) is a rare defect in the continuity of the esophagus, with the absent portion forming an upper and lower segment. Despite both thoracoscopic and conventional open repair (OR) techniques being well established worldwide, the literature remains unclear as to the comparison of surgical outcomes and efficacy of each procedure. Aim: To conduct a systematic review to determine which technique for EA repair, thoracoscopic or open, has the better outcome. Methods: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) compliant literature search returned 14 full text articles for analysis of demographic information and surgical outcomes. Results: Major comorbidities were more likely in the OR group (P < .05) with all other surgical outcomes comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: Overall, this systematic review highlights that the surgical outcomes of patients undergoing thoracoscopic repair for EA are comparable with those of the conventional OR.

A Systematic Review Comparing the Surgical Outcomes of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Surgery for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair

Introduction: Surgical intervention is the definitive management for congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) repair from 1902. Since this time, two mainstay approaches have been used, open and minimally invasive surgical (MIS) repair. An invasive laparotomy is used in around 91% of cases. So, this systematic review of the published literature will compare the surgical outcomes of open (CDH) repair vs MIS for CDH repair and will determine which approach is superior. Material and Methods: Our literature search across MEDLINE and EMBASE included articles from 2004 to 2022, incorporating pediatric CDH repairs, human subjects only, and English language articles. Primary outcomes analyzed were rate of recurrence, length of surgery, length of hospital stay, use of diaphragmatic patch, mortality, postoperative chylothorax, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use postoperatively. Results: After application of exclusion criteria, 32 articles were reviewed. Comparison of MIS repair versus open repair had a rate of recurrence at 8.6% versus 1.6% (P < .00001). Length of hospital stay was 19.6 days versus 33.6 days (P = .0012), mortality rate at 4.6% versus 16.6% (P < .0001), patch repair required in 19.6% versus 55.4% (P = < .00001), and postoperative ECMO use of 3.7% versus 12.3% (P < .00001), respectively. Conclusion: MIS repair is associated with decreased length of hospital stay, reduced mortality rate, and postoperative ECMO usage. Hernia recurrence is still high among MIS repair groups compared to the open repair groups. Large, multicentered randomized control trials are recommended for further analysis to decipher the true superior surgical intervention.

Long-Gap Esophageal Atresia Repair Using Staged Thoracoscopic Internal Traction: The First Kazakhstan Experience

Introduction: The treatment of long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) remains an important issue for pediatric surgeons. There are several methods of treating LGEA with various advantages and disadvantages. Thoracoscopic esophageal elongation using internal traction sutures has been developed more recently. Therefore, we wanted to report on our first experience in treating such pathology using staged thoracoscopic internal traction. Objective: To share our first experience in the treatment of LGEA using staged thoracoscopic internal traction. Methods: Three children with LGEA were treated at the University Medical Center "National Scientific Center for Maternal and Child Health" in the Pediatric Surgery Department, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan, using the method of staged thoracoscopic internal traction. Results: At the age of 3-4 months, 3 patients were operated on successfully using staged thoracoscopic internal traction. In any case, converting to an open thoracotomy was not needed and no anastomotic leakage was observed. In 2 cases, stenosis occurred that was treated by dilatation at least twice, 1 child had no stenosis. Conclusions: Thoracoscopic internal traction technique for LGEA was performed for the first time in Kazakhstan that showed its safety and possible future use in the surgical treatment of this congenital malformation.

Short-term and mid-term effects of thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia: No anastomotic leaks or conversions to open technique

The frequency rate of esophageal anastomosis leaks after thoracoscopic correction of esophageal atresia (EA) in the current literature is reported as 5.6%-24.7% and a conversion rate of 2%-53%. The objective of this retrospective study was to examine the characteristics of EA and analysis of the safety and efficacy of EA repair with the use of the thoracoscopic approach in a single academic center, as well as risk factors analysis in the context of short-term and mid-term follow-up status. A retrospective analysis of the management of all consecutive newborns affected by EA hospitalized in our department over a period between 2013 and 2022, including preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative management, together with the outcome, complications and long-term follow-up status was performed. A total of 38 patients with a median birth weight of 2,570 g (range; 1,020-3,880) were treated over the study period, including 30/38 (78.9%) with additional congenital anomalies. Overall, 30 patients underwent primary anastomosis of the esophagus and eight underwent a multistaged procedure, with or without an initial ligation of the tracheoesophageal fistula and delayed primary anastomosis. Overall survival for all patients was 0.894 ± 0.050, with a median follow-up of 4.5 years. We noted neither anastomotic leaks nor conversions to open technique in our cohort. Implementation of vancomycin prophylaxis was successful in preventing postoperative central venous access-related infectious complications. At the end of the follow-up, 85% of patients have a Lansky performance score ≥80. Risk factors analysis for length of hospitalization, overall survival, Lansky performance status, and neurological impairment were analyzed. In conclusion, we have found that the outcome of thoracoscopic repair of EA in terms of surgery-dependent morbidity (anastomosis leakage, conversion rate to open surgery), provides benefit to those previously reported in the literature, regardless of the prognostic criteria of the classification system.

Thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates: Tips and tricks learned from an institutional experience

BACKGROUND

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is an anomaly with significant morbidity in neonates. It has been traditionally managed by an open approach with a recent trend toward a minimally invasive approach.

AIM

This is a retrospective study of our institutional experience with neonatal thoracoscopic management of CDH, with the impact of few technical nuances.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The data was collected on neonatal thoracoscopic CDH repair between January 2015 and December 2018, in terms of the demographics, intra-operative parameters, post-operative status, recurrence, and mortality. While analyzing data, we found few technical modifications adopted by the surgeon such as trimming the margin of the defect, use of prosthetic mesh overlay reinforcement for repairs under tension, and to prefer extra-corporeal knotting along with higher placement of trocar, temporary increase in CO₂, maximal use of muscle relaxant, extra-corporeal corner hitch stitch at some point, and continuation for further cases. An internal comparison was made to analyze the technical modifications influencing the outcomes, by dividing them into two groups, those with (group A) and without modifications (group B). The data was analyzed using SPSS software (IBM, Version 23). A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Out of 45 newborns 64.4% were males with an average birth weight of 2.6 kg. Baseline variables were comparable between the groups. The operating time significantly reduced after a higher-level camera port was used (P-value: 0.0001). The mean follow-up was 30.8 months. There were totally seven recurrences (6 in group A and 1 in group B), all within 12 months. Seven parents gave the overall post-treatment feedback as "unsatisfied". The operating time, recurrence rate, and parental satisfaction feedback were significantly less in group B (P-value: 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We recommend trimming the margin of the defect, use of prosthetic mesh overlay reinforcement for repairs under tension, and to prefer extra-corporeal knotting along with higher placement of trocar, temporary increase in CO₂, maximal use of muscle relaxant, extra-corporeal corner hitch stitch to reduce the operating time, and recurrence after thoracoscopic CDH repair.

The dilemma after an unforeseen aortic arch anomalies at thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia: Is curtailing surgery still a necessity?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

There are several forms of relevant epi-aortic branching anomalies, and perhaps that is why different views as to the best approach have been reported. To help resolve this dilemma, we examined the unforeseen arch anomalies found at thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia and the outcomes.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort, all consecutive patients who were thoracoscopically approached for esophageal atresia over a 5-year period with unforeseen aortic/epi-aortic branching were identified and grouped. Thoracoscopic views, operative interventions, and outcomes were studied.

RESULTS

A total of 121 neonates were thoracoscopically approached for EA, of whom 18 cases with aberrant aortic architecture were selected. Four (3%) cases were diagnosed on a preoperative echocardiography as a right-sided aortic arch, whereas unforeseen anomalous anatomies were reported in 14 cases (11.6%): left aortic arch with an aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) (n = 10), right-sided aortic arch with an aberrant left subclavian artery (ALSA) (n = 3), and mirror-image right arch (n = 1). Single postoperative mortality was reported among the group with left arch and ARSA (10%), whereas all the cases with right arch and ALSA died.

CONCLUSIONS

In all, 11.6% of the studied series exhibited unexpected aberrant aortic architecture, with higher complication rates in comparison to the typical thoracoscopic repairs. For EA with left aortic arch and ARSA, the primary esophageal surgery could safely be completed. Meanwhile, curtailing surgery-after ligating the TEF-to get advanced imaging is still advised for both groups with the right arch due to the significant existence of vascular rings.

Thoracoscopic Repair of Neonatal Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Minimizing Open Repair in a Low-Income Country

Aim: To assess the severity of persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPH) in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) neonates solely using oxygenation index (OI). Study Design: A prospective study was carried out from April 2016 to March 2019, where all confirmed CDH neonates were evaluated for the possibility repair through thoracoscopic approach. The severity of PPH was assessed using OI. It is calculated using the equation: mean airway pressure (MAP) × FiO₂ × 100 ÷ PaO₂. Neonates having OI <5 were considered to have a mild degree of pulmonary hypertension; hence, thoracoscopic repair was offered for them. Results: Thirty-nine CDH cases met the selection criteria; therefore, they underwent thoracoscopic repair. Primary diaphragmatic repair was successfully accomplished thoracoscopically in all neonates without any perioperative complications. Conversion from thoracoscopy to open method occurred in five cases. The causes were due to difficulties encountered during repair and none was due to a pure anesthetic problem or general deterioration during thoracoscopy. Recurrence had occurred in two cases only. Conclusion: OI is a reliable subjective parameter that could be used as an adjuvant to the usually used cardiovascular and pulmonary parameters for thoracoscopic repair decision. With increasing surgical experience, a wider range of neonates may be considered for thoracoscopic CDH repair.

Thoracoscopic Repair of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia in Preterm Neonate at 1 Kilogram

We report the first successful primary thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) in a preterm infant born at 28 weeks of gestation weighing 1,043 g. Left-sided CDH was incidentally diagnosed on postnatal chest X-ray on day 1. The neonate subsequently underwent thoracoscopic repair with primary closure of the defect on day 8 weighing 1,150 g. Intraoperative arterial blood gas monitoring including end tidal carbon-dioxide remained within normal range throughout. Postoperative recovery was uneventful. One year neurodevelopmental outcome was normal for age with no CDH recurrence.

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates: Open versus thoracoscopic repair

BACKGROUND

There are no standard criteria to select patients for thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). The objective of this study was to compare open laparotomy versus thoracoscopic repair of CDH in neonates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 41 patients who had repair of CDH from 2011 to 2019. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical approach; open laparotomy (n = 30) and thoracoscopic repair (n = 11). Study endpoints were duration of post-operative mechanical ventilation, hospital stay and the return to full enteral feeding.

RESULTS

Patients who had thoracoscopic repair were significantly younger (3 [25^th- 75^th percentiles: 3-3] vs. 4 [3-5] days; P = 0.004). Other pre-operative variables were comparable between both groups. The duration of surgery was significantly longer in the thoracoscopic repair (174 [153-186] vs. 91 (84-99) min; P < 0.001). The use of pre-operative nitrous oxide inhalation was associated with prolonged ventilation (P = 0.004), while the thoracoscopic repair was associated with shorter mechanical ventilation (P = 0.006). Hospital stay is lower in the thoracoscopic approach but did not reach a significant value (P = 0.059). The use of pre-operative nitrous oxide was associated with a prolonged hospital stay (P = 0.002). Younger age (HR: 1.33, P = 0.014) and open approach (HR: 3.56, P = 0.004) were significantly associated with delayed feeding.

CONCLUSIONS

The thoracoscopic approach is safe and effective for repairing the CDH. It is associated with shorter mechanical ventilation and rapid return to enteral feeding. Proper patient selection is essential to achieve good outcomes.

Harlequin Syndrome after Thoracoscopic Repair of a Child with Tracheoesophageal Fistula (TEF)

Harlequin syndrome (HS) is a rare dysautonomia of the sympathetic nervous system leading to asymmetric facial flushing and sweating. In the literature, only a few cases of HS after thoracoscopic tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) repair are reported. We report on a newborn with TEF who developed HS after thoracoscopic repair. On the first day of life, the girl (3,480 g, gestation age: 41 week) underwent thoracoscopic repair of a type C esophageal atresia (TEF; OR time 105 minute) without complications. The postoperative course was uneventful, the patient swallowed and thrived well and did not require esophageal dilatations. At 2 years of age, missing facial flushing, transpiration, and warming on the right side of her face during agitation were noticed. As no further intervention was required, the girl and her parents adapted well to the symptoms. Our report shows that the late onset of HS after the surgical procedure is unlikely a direct causal relation to the thoracoscopic operation but rather a shared embryological pathogenesis, like a neurocristopathy.

Learning curve for the thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula

AIM

Thoracoscopic repair (TR) of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) remains a considerable challenge, even for the most experienced pediatric surgeons. The aim of this study is to report the outcomes of our experience with TR of EA/TEF and to determine the learning curve for this procedure.

METHODS

Eleven consecutive cases that had undergone TR of EA/TEF at our institutes were included in this study. The medical charts were reviewed retrospectively. To determine the learning curve for TR of EA/TEF, a logarithmic curve-fitting analysis was performed. The data were expressed as medians with ranges.

RESULTS

The median age and birth weight were 1 day (range, 1-3 days) and 2.8 kg (range, 2.5-3.7 kg), respectively. TR was completed in all cases without any complications. The median operative time was 230 min (range, 164-383 min). There were no cases of anastomotic leakage. One patient with a long gap required repeated balloon dilatation for refractory anastomotic stricture. No mortality or recurrence of tracheoesophageal fistula occurred. The operative time was significantly longer in patients with a long gap (>20 mm) than in those with a shorter gap. Once the three cases with a long gap had been excluded, the operative time decreased as the number of treated cases increased. The relationship between the operative time and case number fit a logarithmic function curve well (operative time in minutes = 300 - 62 × log (case number), R²  = 0.8359, P = 0.0015).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that TR of EA/TEF is a safe procedure. It has a considerable learning curve, but requires advanced endoscopic surgical skills.

Two-Stage Thoracoscopic Repair of Long-Gap Esophageal Atresia Using Internal Traction Is Safe and Feasible

BACKGROUND

The treatment of long-gap esophageal atresia remains an issue for pediatric surgeons. Many techniques for treating long-gap esophageal atresia have been proposed, but the optimal method has not been established. The thoracoscopic esophageal elongation technique has recently been developed. We previously reported a case in which two-stage thoracoscopic repair was performed using internal esophageal traction without esophageal tearing, and we retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of this procedure in this study.

METHODS

Five patients underwent thoracoscopic treatment involving internal esophageal traction for esophageal atresia involving a long gap or vascular ring over a 5-year period.

RESULTS

Between November 2010 and November 2015, 5 patients were treated with thoracoscopic traction. All of these patients successfully underwent thoracoscopic-delayed primary anastomosis. Conversion to open thoracotomy was not required in any case. The postoperative complications experienced by the patients included minor anastomotic leakage in 2 cases, anastomotic stenosis in 1 case, gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in 4 cases, and a hiatal hernia in 1 case. None of the patients died.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-stage thoracoscopic repair for esophageal atresia involving a long gap or vascular ring is a safe and feasible procedure; however, we must develop methods for treating minor anastomotic complications and GER due to esophageal traction in future.

Thoracoscopic repair of a large neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia using Gerota's fascia

A large congenital diaphragmatic hernia needing patch repair has a high risk of recurrence. Thus, managing these large congenital diaphragmatic hernias under thoracoscopy has become a problem. Here, a large congenital diaphragmatic hernia that was repaired using Gerota's fascia under thoracoscopy is reported. In the present case, it was impossible to close the hernia directly under thoracoscopy because the hernia was too large. Gerota's fascia was raised up by the left kidney and used for the repair. The left colon adhering to Gerota's fascia was mobilized, and a large space was made under thoracoscopy. Gerota's fascia was fixed to the diaphragmatic defect. The patient's postoperative course was good, and there was no recurrence. This technique could be one option for repairing a large hernia under thoracoscopy.

Early recurrence of congenital diaphragmatic hernia is higher after thoracoscopic than open repair: a single institutional study

INTRODUCTION

Experience in thoracoscopic congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) repair has expanded, yet efficacy equal to that of open repair has not been demonstrated. In spite of reports suggesting higher recurrent hernia rates after thoracoscopic repair, this approach has widely been adopted into practice. We report a large, single institutional experience with thoracoscopic CDH repair with special attention to recurrent hernia rates.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of neonates with unilateral CDH repaired between January 2006 and February 2010 at Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital. Completely thoracoscopic repairs were compared to open repairs of the same period. In addition, successful thoracoscopic repairs were compared with thoracoscopic repairs that developed recurrence. Data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U and Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS

Thirty-five neonates underwent attempted thoracoscopic repair, with 26 completed. Concurrently, 19 initially open CDH repairs were performed. Preoperatively, patients in the open repair group required more ventilatory support than the thoracoscopic group. Recurrence was higher after thoracoscopic repair (23% vs 0%; P = .032). In comparing successful thoracoscopic repairs to those with recurrence, none of the factors analyzed were predictive of recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Early recurrence of hernia is higher in thoracoscopic CDH repairs than in open repairs. Technical factors and a steep learning curve for thoracoscopy may account for the higher recurrence rates, but not patient severity of illness. In an already-tenuous patient population, performing the repair thoracoscopically with a higher risk of recurrence may not be advantageous.