Minimal Clinically Important Differences of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function in Patients With Tibial Shaft Fracture

OBJECTIVE

To calculate the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function (PROMIS PF) scores for patients with operatively treated tibial shaft fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort Study.

SETTING

A Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS

All operatively treated tibial shaft fractures identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes.

INTERVENTION

Enrolled patients treated acutely with operative fixation of their tibia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

MCIDs were calculated by distribution-based and anchor-based methods, calculated from PROMIS PF scores completed at least at two-time points postoperatively. MCIDs were calculated at different time points including overall, 7-12 weeks, 3-6 months, and 6-24 months. MCIDs were calculated for different subgroups including open fractures, closed fractures, any complications, and no complications.

RESULTS

MCID for PROMIS PF scores was 5.7 in the distribution-based method and 7.84 (SD 18.65) in the anchor-based method. At 6-24 postoperatively, the months the distribution-based MCID was 5.95 from a postoperative baseline 27.83 (8.74) to 42.85 (9.61), P < 0.001. At 6-24 months, the anchor-based MCID was 10.62 with a score difference between the improvement group of 16.03 (10.73) and the no improvement group of 5.41 (15.75), P < 0.001. Patients with open fractures (distribution-based 6.22 and anchor-based 8.05) and any complications (distribution-based 5.71 and anchor-based 9.29) had similar or higher MCIDs depending on the methodology used than the overall cohort MCIDs.

CONCLUSION

This study identified distribution-based MCID of 5.7 and anchor-based MCID of 7.84 calculated from PROMIS PF scores in operative tibial shaft fractures. Distribution-based methods yielded smaller MCIDs than anchor-based methods. These MCID scores provide a standard to compare clinical and investigational outcomes.

Is It an Overlooked Injury? Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examination of Occult Talus Lesions Concomitant to Tibial Shaft Fracture

Long-term studies have shown that 10% to 20% of patients continue to experience ankle pain years after tibial fracture, which causes poor functional results and dissatisfaction. The aim of this study was to show that there could be a talus injury in patients with a tibial shaft fracture and to reveal occult talus lesions with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination. Fifty-two patients with a tibial shaft fracture, with closed epiphyses, not extending to the joint and with no problems in the application of MRI examination were included. All patients underwent intramedullary tibial nailing. Patients with a lesion detected on MRI were planned to be examined by MRI again at mean of 12 months later. Ankle function of the patients were evaluated with the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Freiburg, and Weber scoring systems at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. At the first MRI, 22 (42.3%) patients with tibial shaft fracture were found to have talus lesions: 7 (13.5%) had osteochondritis dissecans, 12 (23.1%) had edema, and 3 (5.8%) had cysts. A second MRI was planned for patients with edema and osteochondritis dissecans at a mean of 12 months. Finally, at 12 months, MRI examinations revealed osteochondritis dissecans and edema in 9 (17.3%) and 8 (15.4%) patients, respectively. In the evaluations of the patients according to the ankle scoring systems, the scores of the patients with pathology determined in the talus were significantly worse statistically than those of patients with no pathology determined at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Atalus lesion accompanied the tibial shaft fracture at a rate of 37%. The talus injuries were seen especially with an indirect mechanism of trauma, in distal third fractures, in spiral fractures, and when the tibial fracture was accompanied by a lateral malleolar fracture. In the presence of findings indicating talus injury in cases of tibial shaft fracture, the talus should be evaluated with ankle MRI.

Isokinetic Strength Testing Following Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures Predicts Time to Recovery and Return of Muscle Strength in the Injured Extremity: A Prospective Case Series

BACKGROUND

The speed and degree of functional recovery over time after surgery for tibial shaft fracture has been previously described using subjective methods.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSE

This study aimed to quantitatively measure recovery of isokinetic strength in the injured leg after surgical repair of isolated closed tibial shaft fracture.

METHODS

In this prospective case series, patients were recruited after intramedullary nailing for isolated closed tibial shaft fracture at an academic medical center from January 2012 to December 2015. Recovery of isokinetic strength was quantified using an isokinetic dynamometer. Eight measures of isokinetic strength at 3, 6, and 12 months' follow-up were used to compare strength in the injured leg to the healthy leg.

RESULTS

In 36 patients recruited, there was a significant difference in strength between the healthy and injured legs at 3 months for seven of the eight metrics used, at 6 months for five of the eight metrics, and at 12 months for none of the eight metrics. Observing recovery of strength longitudinally, we saw significant improvement between 3 and 6 months for four of eight metrics and overall between 3 and 12 months for five of the eight metrics. All four metrics that showed a significant improvement between 3 and 6 months involved plantar flexion. No metrics showed significant improvement between 6 and 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients exhibited equal strength between their healthy and injured legs at 12 months after surgery. Improvement in strength occurred to a greater extent between 3 and 6 months after surgery than between 6 and 12 months. Plantar flexion appeared to improve more rapidly than dorsal extension.