1
|
Dong L, Li H, Dang H, Zhang X, Yue S, Zhang H. Corrigendum: Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for disorders of consciousness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1293703. [PMID: 37829726 PMCID: PMC10565647 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1293703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1219043.].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linghui Dong
- Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China
- University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Hui Li
- Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China
- University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Hui Dang
- Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China
- University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | | | - Shouwei Yue
- Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China
- University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dong L, Li H, Dang H, Zhang X, Yue S, Zhang H. Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for disorders of consciousness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1219043. [PMID: 37496734 PMCID: PMC10366382 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1219043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) and compare differences in efficacy between different stimulation modalities. Methods We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases for all studies published in English from inception to April 2023. Literature screening and quality assessment were performed independently by two investigators. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the therapeutic effects of NIBS. The Cochrane Q test and I2 statistic were used to evaluate heterogeneity between studies. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify the source of heterogeneity, and differences in efficacy between different stimulation modalities were compared by Bayesian analysis. Results A total of 17 studies with 377 DoC patients were included. NIBS significantly improved the state of consciousness in DoC patients when compared to sham stimulation (WMD: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.46, 1.17; I2 = 78.2%, p = 0.000). When divided into subgroups according to stimulation modalities, the heterogeneity of each subgroup was significantly lower than before (I2: 0.00-30.4%, p >0.05); different stimulation modalities may be the main source of such heterogeneity. Bayesian analysis, based on different stimulation modalities, indicated that a patient's state of consciousness improved most significantly after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Diagnosis-based subgroup analysis showed that NIBS significantly improved the state of consciousness in patients with a minimal consciousness state (WMD: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.37, 1.86) but not in patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome or a vegetative state (WMD: 0.31; 95% CI: -0.09, 0.71). Subgroup analysis based on observation time showed that single treatment did not improve the state of consciousness in DoC patients (WMD: 0.28; 95% CI: -0.27, 0.82) while multiple treatments could (WMD: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.49, 1.61). Furthermore, NIBS had long-term effects on DoC patients (WMD: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.08-1.49). Conclusion Available evidence suggests that the use of NIBS on patients with DoC is more effective than sham stimulation, and that rTMS of the left DLPFC may be the most prominent stimulation modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linghui Dong
- Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China
- University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Hui Li
- Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China
- University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Hui Dang
- Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China
- University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | | | - Shouwei Yue
- Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China
- University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ganguly J, Murgai A, Sharma S, Aur D, Jog M. Non-invasive Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Movement Disorders. Front Neurosci 2020; 14:522. [PMID: 32581682 PMCID: PMC7290124 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2019] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Dysfunction within large-scale brain networks as the basis for movement disorders is an accepted hypothesis. The treatment options for restoring network function are limited. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation are now being studied to modify the network. Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is also a portable, cost-effective, and non-invasive way of network modulation. Transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial alternating current stimulation have been studied in Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, tremor, and ataxia. Transcranial pulsed current stimulation and transcranial random noise stimulation are not yet studied enough. The literature in the use of these techniques is intriguing, yet many unanswered questions remain. In this review, we highlight the studies using these four potential tES techniques and their electrophysiological basis and consider the therapeutic implication in the field of movement disorders. The objectives are to consolidate the current literature, demonstrate that these methods are feasible, and encourage the application of such techniques in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacky Ganguly
- Movement Disorder Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Aditya Murgai
- Movement Disorder Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Soumya Sharma
- Movement Disorder Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Dorian Aur
- Movement Disorder Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Mandar Jog
- Movement Disorder Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Möller A, Nemmi F, Karlsson K, Klingberg T. Transcranial Electric Stimulation Can Impair Gains during Working Memory Training and Affects the Resting State Connectivity. Front Hum Neurosci 2017; 11:364. [PMID: 28747878 PMCID: PMC5506218 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2016] [Accepted: 06/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial electric stimulation (tES) is a promising technique that has been shown to improve working memory (WM) performance and enhance the effect of cognitive training. However, experimental set up and electrode placement are not always determined based on neurofunctional knowledge about WM, leading to inconsistent results. Additional research on the effects of tES grounded on neurofunctional evidence is therefore necessary. Sixty young, healthy, volunteers, assigned to six different groups, participated in 5 days of stimulation or sham treatment. Twenty-five of these subjects also participated in MRI acquisition. We performed three experiments: In the first one, we evaluated tES using either direct current stimulation (tDCS) with bilateral stimulation of the frontal or parietal lobe; in the second one, we used the same tDCS protocol with a different electrode placement (i.e., supraorbital cathode); in the third one, we used alternating currents (tACS) of 35 Hz, applied bilaterally to either the frontal or parietal lobes. The behavioral outcome measure was the WM capacity (i.e., number of remembered spatial position) during the 5 days of training. In a subsample of subjects we evaluated the neural effects of tDCS by measuring resting state connectivity with functional MRI, before and after the 5 days of tDCS and visuo-spatial WM training. We found a significant impairment of WM training-related gains associated with parietal tACS and frontal tDCS. Five days of tDCS stimulation was also associated with significant change in resting state connectivity revealed by multivariate pattern analysis. None of the stimulation paradigms resulted in improved WM performance or enhanced WM training gains. These results show that tES can have negative effects on cognitive plasticity and affect resting-state functional connectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Möller
- Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska InstitutetStockholm, Sweden
| | - Federico Nemmi
- Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska InstitutetStockholm, Sweden
| | - Kim Karlsson
- Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska InstitutetStockholm, Sweden
| | - Torkel Klingberg
- Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska InstitutetStockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Prete G, D'Anselmo A, Tommasi L, Brancucci A. Modulation of Illusory Auditory Perception by Transcranial Electrical Stimulation. Front Neurosci 2017; 11:351. [PMID: 28676740 PMCID: PMC5476865 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2017] [Accepted: 06/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to test whether transcranial electrical stimulation can modulate illusory perception in the auditory domain. In two separate experiments we applied transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (anodal/cathodal tDCS, 2 mA; N = 60) and high-frequency transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (hf-tRNS, 1.5 mA, offset 0; N = 45) on the temporal cortex during the presentation of the stimuli eliciting the Deutsch's illusion. The illusion arises when two sine tones spaced one octave apart (400 and 800 Hz) are presented dichotically in alternation, one in the left and the other in the right ear, so that when the right ear receives the high tone, the left ear receives the low tone, and vice versa. The majority of the population perceives one high-pitched tone in one ear alternating with one low-pitched tone in the other ear. The results revealed that neither anodal nor cathodal tDCS applied over the left/right temporal cortex modulated the perception of the illusion, whereas hf-tRNS applied bilaterally on the temporal cortex reduced the number of times the sequence of sounds is perceived as the Deutsch's illusion with respect to the sham control condition. The stimulation time before the beginning of the task (5 or 15 min) did not influence the perceptual outcome. In accordance with previous findings, we conclude that hf-tRNS can modulate auditory perception more efficiently than tDCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Prete
- Department of Psychological Science, Health and Territory, Università degli Studi "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti - PescaraChieti, Italy
| | - Anita D'Anselmo
- Department of Psychological Science, Health and Territory, Università degli Studi "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti - PescaraChieti, Italy
| | - Luca Tommasi
- Department of Psychological Science, Health and Territory, Università degli Studi "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti - PescaraChieti, Italy
| | - Alfredo Brancucci
- Department of Psychological Science, Health and Territory, Università degli Studi "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti - PescaraChieti, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Neural oscillations in the gamma range are the dominant rhythmic activation pattern in the human auditory cortex. These gamma oscillations are functionally relevant for the processing of rapidly changing acoustic information in both speech and non-speech sounds. Accordingly, there is a tight link between the temporal resolution ability of the auditory system and inherent neural gamma oscillations. Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) has been demonstrated to specifically increase gamma oscillation in the human auditory cortex. However, neither the physiological mechanisms of tRNS nor the behavioral consequences of this intervention are completely understood. In the present study we stimulated the human auditory cortex bilaterally with tRNS while EEG was continuously measured. Modulations in the participants’ temporal and spectral resolution ability were investigated by means of a gap detection task and a pitch discrimination task. Compared to sham, auditory tRNS increased the detection rate for near-threshold stimuli in the temporal domain only, while no such effect was present for the discrimination of spectral features. Behavioral findings were paralleled by reduced peak latencies of the P50 and N1 component of the auditory event-related potentials (ERP) indicating an impact on early sensory processing. The facilitating effect of tRNS was limited to the processing of near-threshold stimuli while stimuli clearly below and above the individual perception threshold were not affected by tRNS. This non-linear relationship between the signal-to-noise level of the presented stimuli and the effect of stimulation further qualifies stochastic resonance (SR) as the underlying mechanism of tRNS on auditory processing. Our results demonstrate a tRNS related improvement in acoustic perception of time critical auditory information and, thus, provide further indices that auditory tRNS can amplify the resonance frequency of the auditory system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Philipp Ruhnau
- Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke UniversityMagdeburg, Germany
| | | | - Tino Zaehle
- Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke UniversityMagdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
People generally have imperfect introspective access to the mechanisms underlying their political beliefs, yet can confidently communicate the reasoning that goes into their decision making process. An innate desire for certainty and security in ones beliefs may play an important and somewhat automatic role in motivating the maintenance or rejection of partisan support. The aim of the current study was to clarify the role of the DLPFC in the alteration of political beliefs. Recent neuroimaging studies have focused on the association between the DLPFC (a region involved in the regulation of cognitive conflict and error feedback processing) and reduced affiliation with opposing political candidates. As such, this study used a method of non-invasive brain simulation (tRNS) to enhance activity of the bilateral DLPFC during the incorporation of political campaign information. These findings indicate a crucial role for this region in political belief formation. However, enhanced activation of DLPFC does not necessarily result in the specific rejection of political beliefs. In contrast to the hypothesis the results appear to indicate a significant increase in conservative values regardless of participant's initial political orientation and the political campaign advertisement they were exposed to.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ryota Kanai
- School of Psychology, University of SussexBrighton, UK; Sackler Centre for Consciousness ScienceBrighton, UK; Department of Neuroinformatics, Araya Brain ImagingTokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moseley P, Alderson-Day B, Ellison A, Jardri R, Fernyhough C. Non-invasive Brain Stimulation and Auditory Verbal Hallucinations: New Techniques and Future Directions. Front Neurosci 2016; 9:515. [PMID: 26834541 PMCID: PMC4717303 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2015] [Accepted: 12/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) are the experience of hearing a voice in the absence of any speaker. Results from recent attempts to treat AVHs with neurostimulation (rTMS or tDCS) to the left temporoparietal junction have not been conclusive, but suggest that it may be a promising treatment option for some individuals. Some evidence suggests that the therapeutic effect of neurostimulation on AVHs may result from modulation of cortical areas involved in the ability to monitor the source of self-generated information. Here, we provide a brief overview of cognitive models and neurostimulation paradigms associated with treatment of AVHs, and discuss techniques that could be explored in the future to improve the efficacy of treatment, including alternating current and random noise stimulation. Technical issues surrounding the use of neurostimulation as a treatment option are discussed (including methods to localize the targeted cortical area, and the state-dependent effects of brain stimulation), as are issues surrounding the acceptability of neurostimulation for adolescent populations and individuals who experience qualitatively different types of AVH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Moseley
- School of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire Preston, UK
| | - Ben Alderson-Day
- Science Laboratories, Department of Psychology, Durham University Durham, UK
| | - Amanda Ellison
- Science Laboratories, Department of Psychology, Durham University Durham, UK
| | - Renaud Jardri
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR-9193, SCA-Lab & CHU Lille, Fontan Hospital, CURE Platform, Lille University Lille, France
| | - Charles Fernyhough
- Science Laboratories, Department of Psychology, Durham University Durham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chaieb L, Antal A, Paulus W. Transcranial random noise stimulation-induced plasticity is NMDA-receptor independent but sodium-channel blocker and benzodiazepines sensitive. Front Neurosci 2015; 9:125. [PMID: 25914617 PMCID: PMC4392589 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2014] [Accepted: 03/26/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Application of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) between 0.1 and 640 Hz of the primary motor cortex (M1) for 10 min induces a persistent excitability increase lasting for at least 60 min. However, the mechanism of tRNS-induced cortical excitability alterations is not yet fully understood. OBJECTIVE The main aim of this study was to get first efficacy data with regard to the possible neuronal effect of tRNS. METHODS Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to measure levels of cortical excitability before and after combined application of tRNS at an intensity of 1 mA for 10 min stimulation duration and a pharmacological agent (or sham) on eight healthy male participants. RESULTS The sodium channel blocker carbamazepine showed a tendency toward inhibiting MEPs 5-60 min poststimulation. The GABA A agonist lorazepam suppressed tRNS-induced cortical excitability increases at 0-20 and 60 min time points. The partial NMDA receptor agonist D-cycloserine, the NMDA receptor antagonist dextromethorphan and the D2/D3 receptor agonist ropinirole had no significant effects on the excitability increases seen with tRNS. CONCLUSIONS In contrast to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), aftereffects of tRNS are seem to be not NMDA receptor dependent and can be suppressed by benzodiazepines suggesting that tDCS and tRNS depend upon different mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Chaieb
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August University Göttingen, Germany ; Department of Epileptology, University of Bonn Bonn, Germany
| | - Andrea Antal
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August University Göttingen, Germany
| | - Walter Paulus
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August University Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Saiote C, Turi Z, Paulus W, Antal A. Combining functional magnetic resonance imaging with transcranial electrical stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7:435. [PMID: 23935578 PMCID: PMC3733022 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2013] [Accepted: 07/16/2013] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is a neuromodulatory method with promising potential for basic research and as a therapeutic tool. The most explored type of tES is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), but also transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) have been shown to affect cortical excitability, behavioral performance and brain activity. Although providing indirect measure of brain activity, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can tell us more about the global effects of stimulation in the whole brain and what is more, on how it modulates functional interactions between brain regions, complementing what is known from electrophysiological methods such as measurement of motor evoked potentials. With this review, we aim to present the studies that have combined these techniques, the current approaches and discuss the results obtained so far.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catarina Saiote
- Clinic for Clinical Neurophysiology, Universitätsmedizin, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation techniques encompass a broad physical variety of stimuli, ranging from static magnetic fields or direct current stimulation to pulsed magnetic or alternating current stimulation with an almost infinite number of possible stimulus parameters. These techniques are continuously refined by new device developments, including coil or electrode design and flexible control of the stimulus waveforms. They allow us to influence brain function acutely and/or by inducing transient plastic after-effects in a range from minutes to days. Manipulation of stimulus parameters such as pulse shape, intensity, duration, and frequency, and location, size, and orientation of the electrodes or coils enables control of the immediate effects and after-effects. Physiological aspects such as stimulation at rest or during attention or activation may alter effects dramatically, as does neuropharmacological drug co-application. Non-linear relationships between stimulus parameters and physiological effects have to be taken into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter Paulus
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|