Comparative Study of Spinal, Epidural, and Sequential Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthesia in Geriatric Patients for Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

BACKGROUND

 Sequential combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSEA) is probably the greatest advancement in the central neuraxial block in this decade for geriatric patients due to the potential advantages of both spinal and epidural anesthesia. This study was designed to compare the clinical effects of sequential CSEA versus spinal and epidural anesthesia in geriatric patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

METHODS

 Ninety patients aged 65 to 80 years were randomly allocated into three groups of 30 each. Group A (n=30) patients were administered spinal anesthesia with 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, group B (n=30) received epidural anesthesia with 15 ml of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine, and group C (n=30) received sequential CSEA with 1 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 6 ml of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine given through epidural route to extend the block up to T10. Patients were observed for hemodynamic parameters, sensory and motor block, total dose required to establish the desired level, and patient satisfaction score.

RESULTS

None of the patients were excluded in the study. Group A patients reported rapid onset of sensory block (3.08±11.57 minutes) compared to group B (11.57±1.48 minutes), and group C (5.47±1.25 minutes). The onset of motor block was expeditious in group A (8.08±1.0 minutes) compared to group B (20.33±1.86 minutes) and group C (15.53±1.31 minutes). Patients in group B had maximum hemodynamic stability but with delayed onset and were technically more complex than group A. Patients in group C were hemodynamically more stable than group A. They had a faster onset of action with decreased doses of local anesthetic drug required compared to group B.

CONCLUSION

Sequential CSEA is a safe, effective, and reliable technique that combines the advantages of both spinal and epidural while minimizing their disadvantages. It has the advantage of stable hemodynamic parameters along with the provision of prolongation analgesia for geriatric patients undergoing TURP surgery.

A 27-Year Experience With Day Surgery Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

Introduction Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the standard surgical procedure for obstructive symptoms of the lower urinary tract when medical management fails. Progression in TURP procedures has led to reduced catheterization time following transurethral prostatic resection. This study describes the methods and results of TURP performed in the day surgery setting. Materials and methods This retrospective study was performed at a day surgical hospital serving a patient population of more than 200,000 people. Over a 27-year period, a total of 1,123 patients with a mean age of 73.6 years (range: 49 to 91 years) underwent same-day conventional (electrosurgical monopolar) transurethral prostatic resection. Of the procedure, 43 patients (11%) received spinal anaesthesia, and the remainder received general anaesthesia.  Results Over the years, there has been an increase in the use of medication to manage bladder outflow obstructive symptoms, which has led to the preoperative post-micturition volumes of urine being increased (>200 ml) at the time of surgical intervention. The mean American Urological Association (AUA) score was 22 (range: 10-35). Due to the reduced bladder tone preoperatively and the noted intraoperative distension of the bladder, early catheter removal is contraindicated in these patients. The mean duration of catheterization was 6.4 days (range: two to 28 days). No patient was readmitted to the hospital for retention of urine. However, 11 patients in the series had re-catheterization due to failure of micturition after the removal of the catheter. No patients were admitted to the hospital for clot retention or sepsis postoperatively. This resulted in the patients being discharged home with a catheter in place, which became our standard practice. Conclusion Conventional transurethral resection of the prostate can be effectively managed in the day surgery setting with minimal morbidity. This improves the patient's quality of life as well as the burden on hospital costs. Additionally, the outpatient nature of day surgery may lead to decreased overall healthcare expenses for both the patient and the healthcare system. As healthcare systems continue to prioritize streamlined and patient-centred approaches, day surgery for TURP emerges as a viable and advantageous option.

A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing the Outcome After Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate with Conventional Monopolar TURP for the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

This is a prospective randomized study with the aim of comparing (thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treatment.

METHODS

Patients are assessed preoperatively and up to 6 months postoperatively. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximum urinary flow rates (Qmax), international index of erectile function-5 (IIEF-5) and post-void residual volume (PVR) are collected on each follow-up.

RESULTS

In comparison to TURP, the ThuLEP group has significantly less need for catheter traction and less need for postoperative irrigation. The operative time is significantly higher in ThuLEP compared to TURP. ThuLEP is significantly superior to TURP in terms of early catheter removal, less drop in haemoglobin, less fall in serum sodium level, and early hospital discharge. ThuLEP and TURP resulted in a significant improvement from baseline in terms of IPSS, PVR, Qmax, and QoL, but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. The IIEF-5 is the same as the baseline in both groups. Early and late complications are also comparable.

CONCLUSION

The ThuLEP outperforms TURP in terms of blood loss, significantly less need for postoperative catheter traction, bladder irrigations, early catheter removal, and less hospital stay. Transurethral resection of the prostate takes longer operative time in the early stages of experience. The results of both surgeries are comparable in terms of PVR, Qmax, and subjective scoring systems (IPSS, QoL). Transurethral resection of the prostate is a safe and efficient BPH treatment method comparable to the monopolar TURP.

Shifting Trends in Prostate Treatment: A Systematic Review Comparing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate and Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

Our systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness and suitability of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) as a treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in comparison to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). We analyzed 12 studies involving male participants aged 45-85 years, all of whom had BPH. In our analysis, we compared HoLEP and TURP, with a focus on several primary outcomes, including postoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), postvoid residual (PVR) volume, maximum flow rate (Qmax), and changes in sexual function post-treatment. HoLEP demonstrated advantages in certain aspects when compared to TURP. HoLEP generally resulted in an improved postoperative IPSS in some studies, but not all studies showed a significant difference when compared to TURP. HoLEP was associated with improved Qmax in most studies, but one study found no significant difference between HoLEP and TURP. Patients who underwent HoLEP showed improvement in the PVR volume in some studies, while others found no significant change in the PVR volume with either HoLEP or TURP. Some studies reported a reduction in orgasm and ejaculatory scores following TURP, while no significant changes were observed in erectile function, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction scores. It is worth noting that previous reviews and meta-analyses had limited data on the effects of HoLEP and TURP on sexual dysfunction. TURP is associated with a higher risk of morbidity and mortality, which has led to its replacement with HoLEP as the gold standard for treating BPH, particularly due to its size-independent applicability. HoLEP also demonstrated greater efficacy in the postoperative period.

Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Repair Using the Totally Extraperitoneal Approach: A Retrospective Study and Our Experience

Background Recently, laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair has been considered one of the most effective and widely performed techniques for repairing inguinal hernias by avoiding entry into the peritoneal cavity. Its indications have evolved and expanded to almost encompass the entire range of groin hernias. This retrospective study aims to determine the outcomes and postoperative complications in patients undergoing TEP inguinal hernia repair performed by a single surgeon for groin hernias at a single center. Methodology We retrospectively evaluated the prospectively collected data of 900 patients who underwent elective TEP repair over 18 years at a single center performed by a single surgeon from April 2004 to February 2023. Patients were evaluated for age, sex, type of hernia, time taken for surgery, open from laparoscopy, intra and postoperative complications, hospital stay, and days taken to resume regular activity. Results The mean age of the 900 patients was 59 years (range = 21-83 years). The mean age of males and females was 59 and 56 years, respectively. The mean operative time was 40 and 55 minutes for a unilateral and bilateral hernia, respectively. In total, 369 (41%) patients had a right-sided groin hernia, 382 (42%) patients had a left-sided groin hernia, and 149 (16.5%) patients had bilateral groin hernias. A total of 121 (13%) patients had occult hernias, and 17 patients underwent concurrent TEP and transurethral resection of the prostate. Of the 900 patients, 20 (2.2%) had a recurrent hernia after a previous open inguinal hernia repair. Seven (0.8%) patients had a recurrence of hernias post-TEP and subsequently underwent open inguinal hernia repair. Seven (0.7%) patients needed conversion from TEP to the transabdominal pre-peritoneal approach. Only minor complications were noted intra and postoperatively. The average time of hospitalization was 24 hours. The time to resume normal activities was five (±1) days. Conclusions Our experience suggests that TEP repair with mesh fixation is a safe and effective procedure with a marginal recurrence rate. Apart from the obvious cosmetic benefits of minimal tissue invasion, a significant advantage of TEP is the visualization of the contralateral groin along with the surgical repair of a hernia, if required, in the same sitting and without the insertion of any extra trocars.

Relationship of Abdominal Circumference and Trunk Length With Spinal Anesthesia Block Height in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of Prostate

INTRODUCTION

Spinal anesthesia is commonly used for various surgical procedures. Prediction of spinal anesthesia block height is always a challenging task for anesthetists. Higher than desired levels of spinal anesthesia blocks are associated with serious side effects, while inadequate block height does not provide satisfactory surgical anesthesia. In this study, we observed the relationship between the ratio of trunk length (TL) and square of the abdominal circumference (AC²) and spinal anesthesia sensory block height in geriatric patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

MATERIAL & METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi, Pakistan, on geriatric patients undergoing TURP under spinal anesthesia. Forty-three elderly patients (American Society of Anaesthesiology level I-III) between 60 and 80 years were recruited for the study. In hospital wards, trunk length (TL) and abdominal circumference were recorded before the procedure. In the operating rooms, spinal anesthesia was performed at L3-L4 intervertebral space with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 10mg (2mls). Block height was measured by the placement of ice pads at different dermatomes. Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to analyze the physical parameters (TL/AC²) and spinal anesthesia block height.  Results: The ratio of trunk length and square of the abdominal circumference (TL/AC²) correlates with spinal anesthesia block height in geriatric patients, where the spearman rank correlation coefficient was r =-0.284 with p = 0.015.

CONCLUSION

The ratio of the long axis (TL) and transection area of the abdomen (AC²), which coincides with (TL/AC²), correlated with spinal anesthesia sensory block height. Hence, elderly patients with a low TL/AC² ratio will have higher block height after spinal anesthesia.

Sloughing Prostatic Tissue, a Rare Complication Post Rezum Therapy: A Case Report

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most prevalent urological disease in men that leads to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The clinical presentation is, most likely, obstructive symptoms such as intermittency, hesitancy and poor stream, due to the obstructive nature of the pathology. BPH treatment approach varies. However, they can be divided into two main approaches which are non-surgical and surgical. Non-surgical methods usually started first, such as lifestyle modifications, watchful waiting, and medications. Hence, surgical intervention remains the mainstay of treatment to relieve clinical symptoms. Although transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the gold standard, management is shifting towards minimally invasive surgeries such as Rezūm due to its good outcome and fewer adverse effects. We present a case of prostatic tissue sloughing, a rare complication post Rezūm system therapy in a 50-year-old male.

A Comprehensive Review of Pharmaceutical and Surgical Interventions of Prostate Cancer

As the second most common cause of death amongst men in the United States, prostate cancer is a type of cancer that is known to develop and originate in the prostate gland. The main function of the prostate gland is to produce seminal fluid in which the sperm bathes. The seminal fluids are necessary for allowing the sperm to move easily through the urethra and also allows successful fertilization by providing an alkaline environment for the sperm in the acidic nature of the vagina. The seminal vesicles are two smaller glands that are attached to either side of the prostate gland and in radical prostatectomies, can get removed. In the event that the seminal vesicles are removed during a radical prostatectomy, the individual is unable to produce any seminal fluids and thus, becoming infertile. Prostate cancer is most commonly seen in patients over the age of 66 years, however, in the presence of predisposing risk factors, may occur as early as in the late 40s. Certain risk factors may speed the presentation of prostate cancer in individuals and thus, mandatory screening is recommended around the age of 45. If no risk factors are present, screening is recommended to begin after the age of 50 years. Screening for prostate cancer is focused on looking for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in a blood test, though this may not be the most reliable method. The method of diagnosis stems from further testing done following an abnormal PSA test. A digital rectal examination and ultrasonography may also be used to assist with the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Though there are several different types of pharmaceutical interventions currently present in the eradication of prostate cancer, with androgen deprivation therapy being the most commonly used, surgical interventions may be utilized to completely resect cancer from an individual. Different radical prostatectomies are used; the appropriate approach utilized is dependent on the extensiveness of cancer and the type of cancer that is present.

TURP for BPH. How large is too large?

BPH remains one of the most common diseases that the urologist has to manage. The last decade brought numerous new techniques, aiming to improve the minimally invasive approach to BPH, but, for the moment, none had changed the place of TURP as the gold standard treatment for medium sized prostates. Based on a large personal experience, the authors present a study in which TURP is used for prostates over 80 ml, the cutoff point set by the guidelines of the European Association of Urology. The rationale for this study is that many situations require minimally invasive treatment, based on the express request of the patient, other conditions that makes open surgery very difficult or impossible, or the need for a quick discharge in an overcrowded service. The aim of the study was to prove that TURP is safe and effective even in larger prostates. The technique used is basically the classic one, with minor tactical alterations in some cases. Some cases required a two-stage approach, but offered good functional results after the first stage. The results proved that, with a good technique, a skilled urologist might achieve the same results by using TURP or open surgery for large sized prostates.

Bipolar resection of the bladder and prostate--initial experience with a newly developed regular sized loop resectoscope

OBJECTIVE

Bipolar transurethral resection (TUR) has been introduced in the clinical practice nowadays. Benefits from bipolar TUR are represented by the use of saline irrigation, which avoids hypoosmotic hyperhydration (TUR-Syndrome), as well as by the reduced risk of obturator nerve stimulation. However, the previously introduced smaller bipolar resection loop caused prolonged operating-time. We report our initial experience with a newly developed regular sized loop for a bipolar resectoscope.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Different loop calibers and configurations were tested and compared to a previously introduced bipolar system and conventional resection devices in TUR of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and bladder tumors (TURP and TURBT). The resected tissue was pathologically examined for thermal damage and compared to a control group of monopolar conventionally resected tissue.

RESULTS

The handling of the resectoscope was comparable to that of the conventional ones. Cutting control, cutting speed and coagulation effectiveness were excellent, and no obturator nerve stimulation occurred. The resection area could easily be assessed and tissue examination showed no differences in terms of quality and quantity of thermal damages, since tissue carbonization was reduced. There was no sticking of the resected tissue on the loop.

CONCLUSION

Regular sized loop bipolar resection is safe and efficient. Coagulation and cutting extent control seem superior to conventional TUR. Due to reduced carbonization, the resection ground can be easily assessed. The risk of obturator nerve stimulation is reduced. The histological quality of the tissue is not impaired. This device combines the advantage of a regular size resection loop with bipolar resection in normal saline. It has the potential to become a valuable alternative to monopolar TUR.