Upright proton therapy for esthesioneuroblastoma: a single-institution experience

Aim

This study presents an analysis (efficacy and toxicity) of outcomes in patients with esthesioneuroblastoma after pencil beam proton therapy with a fixed beamline in the upright position.

Background

Esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB) is an extremely rare tumor of sinonasal area located in critical proximity to vital structures. Proton therapy (PT) is often considered the optimal radiation treatment for head-and-neck tumors, although of limited availability. Upright PT delivered using fixed pencil beamline and rotating chair is a fairly promising option.

Methods

This is a single-center experience describing the outcomes of PT in 14 patients with ENB treated between January 2016 and October 2022; half of the cases had a history of previous irradiation. The therapy was applied using a fixed pencil beamline with 6D-chair for positioning. The median dose was 63 GyRBE (total range 48-70 GyRBE; based on 1.1 RBE multiplier for protons) with 2.0 GyRBE per fraction. The mean gross tumor volume was 109.5 cm3 (17.1-257.7 cm3). Patient demography, pathology, treatment parameters and toxicity data were analyzed. Radiation-induced reactions were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 4.0.

Results

The median follow-up time was 28 months. The 1- and 2-year locoregional control rates constituted 100% and 88.9%, respectively; the median duration of local control was 52 months. The 1- and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates constituted 92.9% and 75.0%, respectively; the median PFS duration was 52 months. The 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates constituted 92.9% and 84.4%, respectively. Two patients died of non-cancer-related causes (coronavirus-induced pneumonia) and 1 patient died of tumor progression. All patients tolerated PT well without any treatment gaps. Serious late toxicity reactions included glaucoma in 1 patient and cataract in 2 patients, in over half a year since irradiation.

Conclusion

PT with upright design of the unit affords promising outcomes in terms of disease control and toxicity rates in ENB, a sinonasal tumor of complicated localization.

Evaluation of a short in-person and online antenatal educational intervention for high-risk pregnant women linked to antenatal consultation

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate a short educational intervention that focused on labor pain (through visual analogue scale, VAS), postpartum anxiety, and birthing experience before and during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic.

METHODS

This was a quasi-experimental study conducted between November 2019 and May 2021 in Brazil in 100 women with a high-risk pregnancy in the third trimester of pregnancy with an intervention group with in-person or virtual sessions (during the COVID-19 pandemic) and a non-intervention group. The antenatal intervention included breathing and relaxation techniques, upright positions, and information about labor. For evaluation, an antenatal questionnaire, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and a postpartum questionnaire were used. For data analysis, Student's t-test, chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests, ANOVA, bivariate, and multivariate regression analysis, were used.

RESULTS

When comparing the women in the intervention group to the non-intervention group, it was observed that the latter group reported higher fear of pain at labor during antenatal consultations (p<0.013); more women needed analgesia at 0-4 cm dilation (17/40) (p<0.018); the duration of labor was ≥12 hours (37/50) (p<0.037); while the intervention reported having a regular, good or excellent labor period (36/50) (p=0.014). The multiple regression analysis for labor pain showed a significant relationship between mode of delivery (cesarean delivery: RR; SE -21.43; 5.32, p<0.001) and labor pain, and good satisfaction with labor (RR; SE -13.86; 6.40, p=0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

Women from the intervention group had more satisfaction and less pain during labor than women from the non-intervention group.

Barriers and facilitators of implementing the practice programme for upright positions in the second stage of labour: A mixed-method study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the possible barriers and facilitators to implementing the Upright Positions in the Second Stage of Labour (UPSSL) programme in Chinese healthcare settings.

DESIGN

A mixed-method convergent design with the guidance of Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

METHODS

An online survey study and semi-structured interviews were conducted between March and May 2023. Healthcare professionals were recruited from four hospitals in Shijiazhuang, China. One hundred and thirty-one participants completed the survey study, and 23 of them were interviewed individually. Descriptive statistics evaluated the possible barriers and facilitators of implementing the UPSSL programme within the CFIR framework quantitatively. Guided by the CFIR framework, qualitative data were analysed using directed content analysis to summarize healthcare professionals' perspectives on barriers and facilitators of the UPSSL programme.

RESULTS

Multiple intersectional barriers and facilitators were identified from the survey and semi-interviews. Healthcare professionals believed that the UPSSL programme has a scientific evidence base, systematic contents, and possible benefits for women. However, various barriers existed at individual, system, and organizational levels. Major barriers included healthcare professionals and women's safety concerns towards the use of upright positions during childbirth, the healthcare professionals' unfamiliarity with assisting an upright position birth, poor adaptability of the programme protocol, inadequate facilities and staffing, and a lack of readiness to change in the clinical setting.

CONCLUSIONS

To facilitate the implementation of the UPSSL programme in China, tailored antenatal education on upright positions, especially addressing safety-related issues, should be provided to pregnant women, their families, or peers to enhance their understanding of and familiarity with such positions. Healthcare professionals should also be offered adequate training opportunities and necessary facilities. Furthermore, national-level policy changes might be required to address midwifery workforce shortages. Additionally, further research is warranted to select, adapt, and test effective implementation strategies for programme adoption.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

What problem did the study address? The adoption of upright positions during the second stage of labour could promote better maternal and neonatal outcomes and a positive childbirth experience. However, the adoption of upright positions during the second stage of labour is suboptimal in healthcare settings in China. Barriers and facilitators of implementing upright positions during childbirth are unclear. What were the main findings? A range of barriers and facilitators within the CFIR framework to promote upright positions during childbirth from healthcare professionals' perspectives were identified, and the major barriers included safety concerns towards and unfamiliarity with an upright position birth, inadequate facilities and staffing, and a lack of readiness to change in the clinical setting. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? This study will enable a better understanding of the barriers and facilitators to promoting upright positions in the second stage of labour in China. The smooth and effective implementation of the UPSSL programme could help to promote better maternal and neonatal outcomes and improve women's childbirth experiences.

REPORTING METHOD

The reporting of this study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) and Good Reporting of A Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) guidelines.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

In this study, healthcare professionals were involved in refining the topic guides and survey questions. Additionally, findings from the interviews were returned to them for comments and corrections.

Evidence-based labor management: second stage of labor (part 4)

Several interventions during the second stage of labor have been identified and investigated. Prophylactic intrapartum betamimetics should be avoided, as their usage is associated with an increase in operative vaginal deliveries. Women without epidural anesthesia are recommended to give birth in in any upright or lateral position. The best position for giving birth in women with epidural anesthesia is insufficiently studied, and neither recumbent nor upright positions can therefore be recommended. The routine use of maternal stirrups in the second stage of labor is not recommended. Consider avoiding water immersion during the second stage of labor, as the risks have not been adequately assessed. In nulliparous women at term with epidural analgesia, delayed pushing is not recommended. Pushing via a woman's own urge to push (open glottis) or pushing using the Valsalva maneuver (closed glottis) can both be considered. Both traditional coaching during pushing and ultrasound-assisted coaching may be considered. The use of a dental support device can be considered. All forms of fundal pressure are not recommended in the second stage of labor. Perineal massage and stretching of the perineum with a water-soluble lubricant in the second stage of labor is recommended. Perineal hyaluronidase injection as a method to reduce perineal trauma is not recommended. The use of perineal gel in the second stage of labor is not recommended. The use of perineal warm packs and heating pads are recommended. A perineal protection device can be considered. In fetuses with persistent occiput posterior position, manual rotation can be considered. Routine use of the Ritgen's maneuver does not seem to be associated with any benefits and is not recommended. The "Hands-poised" position is recommended over the "hands-on" method for delivery of the fetus. Routine episiotomy is not recommended. The routine use of ultrasound in the second stage of labor is not recommended. Waiting 1 additional hour (4 hours) for nulliparous women with epidural anesthesia before the diagnosis of a prolonged second stage of labor is recommended. A mandatory second opinion before cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor is recommended.

Implementation of a breech program in a Belgian obstetric team

OBJECTIVE

To stimulate obstetric centers to start training in breech counseling and selection and performing vaginal breech deliveries.

METHODS

The different steps that were needed to roll out a breech program, are described: the "walking" epidural (PIEB protocol), the breech consultation with a structured counseling tool, and training of the whole team (gynecologists, midwives, anesthesiologists, and pediatricians). We describe below the results of 111 women who were counseled at the breech consultation, in the period May 2019 to August 2021.

RESULTS

In all, 86.5% of patients (n= 96) with a singleton term breech met the criteria for a vaginal breech delivery; 77% of this group (n= 74) accepted a planned vaginal breech delivery. Of this group, 54% (n=40) had a successful vaginal breech delivery, 27% (n=20) ended up in a secondary cesarean section, and 19% (n=14) had a planned cesarean section.

CONCLUSION

We were able to roll out a successful breech program, including vaginal breech delivery, in a safe way. The breech consultation is the most essential part of the process. Training of the whole team is mandatory. The results of the first 2 years are encouraging to continue this program.

Effects of General Fatigue Induced by Exhaustive Exercise on Posture and Gait Stability of Healthy Young Men

Bipedal walking is a composite task requiring integration of many control circuitries in the brain and spinal cord. The present study was carried out to verify whether an increase in blood lactate, such as that associated with a high intensity exercise, is able to significantly modify the qualitative and/or quantitative aspects of human walking. Eighteen healthy physically male participants, aged between 20 and 24 years (M = 21.8, SD = 1.22), were recruited for the study. For this purpose, the experimental protocol included the measure of blood lactate levels with the aim of assessing possible relations between lactate blood values and different aspect of walking after an exhaustive exercise. An exhaustive exercise was associated with a strong increase of blood lactate levels and produced a significant worsening in the ability to maintain the bipodalic upright posture as well as the fluidity of walking. Our results suggest that exhausting bouts impose greater challenges on postural control.

Cerebral haemodynamics with head position changes post-ischaemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The effects of upright postures on the cerebral circulation early post-ischaemic stroke are not fully understood. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effects of head positioning on cerebral haemodynamics assessed by imaging methods post-ischaemic stroke. Of the 21 studies included (n = 529), 15 used transcranial Doppler. Others used near-infrared, diffuse correlation spectroscopy and nuclear medicine modalities. Most tested head positions between 0° and 45°. Seventeen studies reported changes in CBF parameters (increase at lying-flat or decrease at more upright) in the ischaemic hemisphere with position change. However, great variability was found and risk of bias was high in many studies. Pooled data of two studies ≤24 h (n = 28) showed a mean increase in cerebral blood flow (CBF) velocity of 8.5 cm/s in the ischaemic middle cerebral artery (95%CI,-2.2-19.3) from 30° to 0°. The increase found ≤48 h (n = 50) was of 2.3 cm/s (95%CI,-4.6-9.2), while ≤7 days (n = 38) was of 8.4 cm/s (95%CI, 1.8-15). Few very early studies (≤2 days) tested head positions greater than 30° and were unable to provide information about the response of acute stroke patients to upright postures (sitting, standing). These postures are part of current clinical practice and knowledge on their effects on cerebral haemodynamics is required.

Impact of body posture change on peripherally inserted central catheter tip position in Chinese cancer patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of body posture change on the peripherally inserted central catheter tip position in Chinese cancer patients.

METHODS

A prospective observational trial was conducted in a tertiary cancer hospital from August to September 2018. After the insertion of peripherally inserted central catheter, chest X-ray films were taken to check the catheter tip in the upright and supine positions, respectively. The distance from the carina to the catheter tip was separately measured on both chest films by nurses. The primary study outcome was the distance and direction of the catheter tip movement. The secondary study outcome was to analyze the influence factors on the catheter tip movement. The third study outcome was to observe the related adverse events caused by the catheter tip movement.

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients were included, the results showed that 61 moved cephalad, 14 moved caudally, and 4 did not move with body change from the supine to the upright position. When moved cephalad, the mean distance was 19.34 ± 11.95 mm; when moved caudally, the mean distance was -15.83 ± 8.97 mm. The difference between the two positions was statistically significant (p < 0.001). There was also a statistically significant difference between catheter tip movement direction and body mass index (p = 0.009) and height (p = 0.015). Two patients developed arrhythmias; no cardiac tamponade was found due to body posture change.

CONCLUSION

The results of this work implied that the tips of the catheter tend to shift toward the cephalad with body change from the supine to the upright position. A study involving a larger sample size is needed to find more information in the future.

Healthy Birth Practice #2: Walk, Move Around, and Change Positions Throughout Labor

Women who use upright positions and are mobile during labor have shorter labors, less intervention, fewer cesarean births, and report less severe pain, and describe more satisfaction with their childbirth experience than women in recumbent positions. The evidence for supporting physiologic childbearing for optimal birth fails to disrupt intervention intensive hospital practices that deny 60% of women mobility in labor despite calls by maternity care organizations to not restrict mobility for low risk women in spontaneous labor.

Could a Certain Sitting Position Reduce the Pain Experienced by a Child? The Benefits of Parental Holding and an Upright Position

Intravenous injection is the most feared medical procedure and gives rise to an experience of mild to severe pain in children. Unrestrained pain has a negative effect on the child. Pain management in the form of a convenient sitting position is needed by children who undergo intravenous injection procedures. This study aims to determine the effect of parental holding and an upright position on children's pain during intravenous injection procedures. The study used the Randomized Clinical Trial method involving 34 respondents, aged 1-4 years, who were included in the intervention and control group. The result of a Mann-Whitney U test analysis showed a significant difference in the pain score between the intervention and control groups (p value = .000; α = .05). The parental holding and upright position can be applied as a nonpharmacological pain management strategy for children who undergo intravenous injection procedures.

No reduction in instrumental vaginal births and no increased risk for adverse perineal outcome in nulliparous women giving birth on a birth seat: results of a Swedish randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The WHO advises against recumbent or supine position for longer periods during labour and birth and states that caregivers should encourage and support the woman to take the position in which she feels most comfortable. It has been suggested that upright positions may improve childbirth outcomes and reduce the risk for instrumental delivery; however RCTs of interventions to encourage upright positions are scarce. The aim of this study was to test, by means of a randomized controlled trial, the hypothesis that the use of a birthing seat during the second stage of labor, for healthy nulliparous women, decreases the number of instrumentally assisted births and may thus counterbalance any increase in perineal trauma and blood loss.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial in Sweden where 1002 women were randomized to birth on a birth seat (experimental group) or birth in any other position (control group). Data were collected between November 2006 and July 2009. The primary outcome measurement was the number of instrumental deliveries. Secondary outcome measurements included perineal lacerations, perineal edema, maternal blood loss and hemoglobin. Analysis was by intention to treat.

RESULTS

The main findings of this study were that birth on the birth seat did not reduce the number of instrumental vaginal births, there was an increase in blood loss between 500 ml and 1000 ml in women who gave birth on the seat but no increase in bleeding over 1000 ml and no increase in perineal lacerations or perineal edema.

CONCLUSIONS

The birth seat did not reduce the number of instrumental vaginal births. The study confirmed an increased blood loss 500 ml - 1000 ml but not over 1000 ml for women giving birth on the seat. Giving birth on a birth seat caused no adverse consequences for perineal outcomes and may even be protective against episiotomies.