Updates and Ongoing Challenges in Imaging of Multiple Myeloma: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Advances in the understanding and treatment of multiple myeloma have led to the need for more sensitive and accurate imaging of intramedullary and extramedullary disease. This role of imaging is underscored by recently revised imaging recommendations of the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG). This narrative review discusses these recommendations from the IMWG for different disease stages, focusing on advanced whole-body modalities, and addresses related challenges and controversies. In the recommendations, whole-body low-dose CT is central in initial patient assessment, replacing the conventional skeletal survey. Although the recommendations favor MRI for diagnosis because of its superior sensitivity and utility in identifying myeloma-defining events, FDG PET/CT is recommended as the modality of choice for assessing treatment response. Consensus opinions are offered regarding the role of imaging in multiple myeloma for characterization of disease distribution, determination of prognosis, and response evaluation.

Whole-Body Low-Dose CT in Multiple Myeloma: Diagnostic Value of Appendicular Medullary Patterns of Attenuation

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to analyze whole-body low-dose CT-detected appendicular medullary patterns of attenuation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and to determine the diagnostic performance of whole-body low-dose CT in detecting diffuse marrow infiltration. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 76 patients with myeloma who underwent whole-body low-dose CT and spinal MRI at initial assessment were retrospectively analyzed. The medullary cavities of femurs and humeri were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively on CT. Medullary attenuation and SD-to-mean attenuation ratio were recorded for each long bone. The pattern of marrow involvement on spinal MRI was used as reference. The chi-square test was used to evaluate the relationship between the CT-based appendicular medullary cavity pattern and the MRI pattern, and ROC analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CT attenuation measurements for the differentiation between diffuse and mixed CT-based appendicular medullary cavity patterns. RESULTS. Medullary attenuation differed significantly among mixed, nodular, and diffuse CT-based appendicular medullary cavity patterns in the femurs (mean, 34.23 HU and range, 15-61 HU; mean, 66.26 HU and range, 26-104 HU; mean, 92.80 HU and range, 53-127 HU, respectively) and humeri (mean, 22.18 HU and range, 9-41; mean, 61.18 HU and range, 23-93 HU; mean, 77.50 and range, 25-105 HU, respectively). To discriminate between diffuse and mixed CT-based appendicular medullary cavity patterns, optimal cutoff attenuation values were 63 HU (sensitivity, 97.7%; specificity, 100.0%) for the femurs, and 52 HU (sensitivity, 97.4%; specificity, 100.0%) for the humeri. A total of 24 of 30 (80.0%) patients with a diffuse MRI pattern showed a diffuse CT-based appendicular medullary cavity pattern on whole-body low-dose CT, and all patients with a diffuse CT-based appendicular medullary cavity pattern also showed a diffuse pattern on MRI. CONCLUSION. According to analysis of peripheral medullary patterns of attenuation, whole-body low-dose CT can identify patients with multiple myeloma with diffuse marrow involvement.