Thromboprophylaxis in myeloma: what is happening outside of clinical trials?

Patients with myeloma are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). There is no consensus about what agent to use or what haematologists are doing in clinical practice. A survey was sent to haematologists treating patients with myeloma in Ireland. 32/45 (71%) responded. 13/28 (46%) felt that VTE affected < 5% of patients. However, 8/28 (29%) felt it affected 10-19%. Thromboprophylaxis was most commonly used in patients on lenalidomide; 25/28 (89%) and thalidomide; 23/28 (82%). 23/28 (82%) used LMWH and 20/28 (71%) used aspirin either very frequently or frequently. 3/28 (11%) had used dabigatran/rivaroxaban despite there being little evidence to support their use. Efficacy was the most important factor in choosing an agent for 25/28 (89%). Bleeding was not felt to be an issue 15/29 (52%) were not using thromboprophylaxis guidelines. This survey demonstrated wide variation in the beliefs and practices regarding the burden of VTE in patients with myeloma and the need for thromboprophylaxis.

[Conservative treatment of patients with intermittent claudication]

The article deals with the analysis of the results of randomized placebo-controlled studies of various therapeutic agents currently available in Russia, as well as the results of meta-analyses and Cochrane reviews of medicamentous treatment of patients with intermittent claudication. The results of these studies gave grounds to recommend the most efficient agents in the new edition of the "National Guidelines on management of patients with lower-limb arterial disease" (2013).