A Patient With Type 1 Diabetes and Acute Rhinosinusitis

A 41-year-old with type 1 diabetes had generalized weakness, muffled voice, and slurred speech. Neck computed tomography showed soft-tissue gas in the nasopharynx and prevertebral fascia; examination of sinus mucosal samples identified numerous broad, nonseptate right-angled hyphae and fruiting bodies. What is the diagnosis and what would you do next?

Patient perspectives on recall period and response options in patient-reported outcome measures for chronic rhinosinusitis symptomatology: An international multi-centered study

BACKGROUND

Existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) use a variety of recall periods and response scales to assess CRS symptom burden. Global perspectives of CRS patients regarding optimal recall periods and response scales for CRS PROMs are unknown.

METHODS

This was a multi-center, cross-sectional study recruiting 461 CRS patients from sites across the United States, Saudi Arabia, New Zealand, and Austria. Participants chose which CRS symptom recall period (1 day, 2 weeks, 1 month, >1 month) was most reflective of their current disease state and upon which to best base treatment recommendations (including surgery). Participants also chose which of six response scales (one visual analogue scale and five Likert scales ranging from four to eight items) was easiest to use, understand, and preferred.

RESULTS

A plurality of participants (40.0%) felt their CRS symptoms' current state was best reflected by a 1-month recall period. However, most patients (56.9%) preferred treatment recommendations to be determined by symptoms experienced over a >1 month period. The four- and five-item Likert scales were the easiest to understand (26.0% and 25.4%, respectively) and use (23.4% and 26.7%, respectively). The five-item (26.4% rating it most preferred and 70.9% rating it preferred) and four-item Likert (22.3% rating it most preferred and 56.4% rating it preferred) response scales were most preferred.

CONCLUSION

Future PROMs for CRS should consider assessment of symptoms over a 1-month period and use a four- or five-item Likert response scale to reflect global patient preferences. These findings also inform interpretation of current CRS PROMs.

Impact of dual electronic and conventional cigarette use on diagnosis and surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: A multicenter study

KEY POINTS

Dual EC/CC users had a significantly greater risk of CRS or FESS when compared to solo users. Dual EC/CC users did not have a significantly greater risk of polyposis when compared to solo users. This effect likely relates to bacterial, immune cell, genetic, and mucociliary alterations.

Comparison of mucus and serum biomarker sampling in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyze advantages and disadvantages of mucus and serum for biomarker analysis.

METHODS

This study includes prospective study of 61 CRS with nasal polyps patients who were followed over 24 months and over nine time points after functional endoscopic sinus surgery. At each time points, the nasal polyp score (NPS) was assessed and mucus as well as serum was collected. Selected were measured in mucus and serum. Mean, standard deviation and variance, undetectable values, and the correlation of the biomarkers to the NPS over time and to early recurrences were calculated, and the effect of surgery on the biomarkers was assessed. Additionally, the diurnal rhythm of all biomarkers was measures in order to assure stable biomarker values during sampling times.

RESULTS

All biomarkers showed stable values during sampling times. Serum biomarker levels displayed higher percentages of undetectable values compared to mucus biomarkers. Mucus periostin (p < 0.001, r = 0.89), mucus IgE (p < 0.001, r = 0.51), serum periostin (p < 0.001, r = 0.53), mucus CST1 (p < 0.001, r = 0.27), and serum IgE (p < 0.01, r = -0.18) were the best marker and medium combinations to track the NPS over time and to predict recurrences. Mucus serpinF2 was negatively correlated and predicted early recurrences (p = 0.026, R2 = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum and mucus both represent viable mediums for "liquid biopsies." The most promising biomarker/medium combinations over time to track disease severity were mucus periostin, mucus IgE, serum periostin, mucus CST1, and serum IgE. Mucus serpinF2 was the best biomarker to predict early recurrences.

Chinese adaptation and validation of the chronic rhinosinusitis-patient-reported outcome: Assessment of health-related quality-of-life

BACKGROUND

The chronic rhinosinusitis patient-reported outcome (CRS-PRO) is a recently published disease-specific questionnaire designed for CRS patients, with fewer entries and ease of completion. This study aimed to translate the CRS-PRO questionnaire into Chinese and assess its reliability, validity, and responsiveness to provide Chinese patients with a more concise and efficient subjective assessment instrument.

METHODS

The Chinese version of the CRS-PRO was created through forward-backward translations and cultural adaptation. Here, 168 CRS patients (118 patients CRS with nasal polyps [CRSwNP] and 50 patients with CRS without nasal polyps [CRSsNP]) and 43 healthy individuals were enrolled. All participants completed the CRS-PRO, 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), and EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D) questionnaires preoperatively as well as 3 and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The Chinese version of the CRS-PRO demonstrated good internal consistency, with a Cronbach's α of 0.813. It also exhibited a higher criterion validity (r = 0.65, p < 0.05) than the SNOT-22. A moderate association was found between the CRS-PRO and objective indicators such as the Lund-Mackay and endoscopic scores. Furthermore, the CRS-PRO, like the SNOT-22, could clearly distinguish CRS patients from healthy subjects (p < 0.01), as well as between the CRSwNP and CRSsNP subtypes (p < 0.01). Additionally, changes in the CRS-PRO exhibited a larger effect size compared to changes in the SNOT-22 (Cohen's d = 1.05 and 0.93 vs. 0.71 and 0.90 for 3 and 6 months, respectively, all p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese version of the CRS-PRO is a concise, reliable, and responsive instrument that can be utilized as a novel subjective evaluation tool for future clinical practice.