Predictive Factors of the Use of Rituximab and Belimumab in Spanish Lupus Patients

Objectives: To analyze the characteristics and the predictive factors of the use of rituximab and belimumab in daily practice in patients from the inception cohort Registro Español de Lupus (RELES). Material and methods: The study included 518 patients. We considered patients treated with biologics who received at least one dose of rituximab or belimumab, and possible indications of those manifestations registered at the same time or in the previous 2 months of the start of the therapy. Results: In our cohort, 37 (7%) patients received at least one biological treatment. Rituximab was prescribed in 26 patients and belimumab in 11. Rituximab was mainly prescribed for hemolytic anemia or thrombocytopenia (11 patients, 42%), lupus nephritis and neuropsychiatric lupus (5 patients each, 19%). Belimumab was mostly used for arthritis (8 patients, 73%). In the univariate analysis, the predictive factors at diagnosis for the use of biologic therapy were younger age (p = 0.022), a higher SLEDAI (p = 0.001) and the presence of psychosis (p = 0.011), organic mental syndrome (SOCA) (p = 0.006), hemolytic anemia (p = 0.001), or thrombocytopenia (p = 0.01). In the multivariant model, only younger age, psychosis, and hemolytic anemia were independent predictors of the use of biologics. Conclusions: Rituximab is usually given to patients with hematological, neuropsychiatric and renal involvement and belimumab for arthritis. Psychosis, hemolytic anemia and age at the diagnosis of lupus were independent predictive factors of the use of biological agents. Their global effects are beneficial, with a significant reduction in SLE activity and a low rate of side effects.

Serological autoimmune profile of systemic lupus erythematosus in deep and non-deep endometriosis patients

OBJECTIVE

Several studies have reported a high prevalence of autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in endometriosis patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the SLE autoimmune antibody profile in patients with deep (DE) and non-deep endometriosis (Non-DE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four groups of premenopausal patients were evaluated: patients with DE (n = 50); patients with ovarian endometriomas (Non-DE; n = 50); healthy patients without endometriosis (C group; n = 45); and SLE patients without endometriosis (SLE group; N = 46). Blood samples were obtained and the standard SLE autoimmune profile was evaluated in all patients. Pain symptoms related to endometriosis and clinical SLE manifestations were also recorded.

RESULTS

The DE group presented a statistically significant higher proportion of patients with antinuclear antibodies (ANA) (20%) compared to the Non-DE group (4%) and C group (2.2%). Levels of complement were more frequently lower among DE and Non-DE patients although differences did not reach statistical significance. Similarly, anti-dsDNA antibodies and anticoagulant lupus were positive in more patients of the DE group but did not reach statistical significance. The DE group complained of more arthralgia and asthenia compared to the Non-DE and C groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study showed higher positivity of ANA and greater arthralgia and asthenia in patients with DE compared with Non-DE patients and healthy controls, suggesting that they may have a higher susceptibility to autoimmune diseases and present more generalized pain.

Patients with laboratory criteria of anti-phospholipid syndrome and 'non-criteria' manifestations: a multicenter cohort

OBJECTIVES

Patients with laboratory criteria for anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) but presenting only 'non-criteria' clinical manifestations are scarcely characterized in the literature. We aimed to analyse a cohort of these patients regarding the most prevalent manifestations, antibody profile, and treatments, while establishing a comparison with definite APS patients.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was conducted of individuals fulfilling APS laboratory criteria assessed in two tertiary European hospitals between 2005 and 2020. Patients without clinical criteria but with non-criteria manifestations (termed 'clinical non-criteria') and age-/gender-matched controls were included.

RESULTS

Altogether, 75 clinical non-criteria patients were analysed, with haematological (thrombocytopenia, haemolytic anaemia) and 'mild' neurological manifestations (white-matter lesions, migraine) as the most prevalent non-obstetric involvements. These patients displayed more thrombocytopenia [odds ratio (OR) = 3.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-7.6; p = 0.001] than controls with APS, but severe manifestations, such as valvular heart disease (p < 0.001), livedoid vasculopathy, seizures, chorea, transverse myelitis, bone necrosis, and alveolar haemorrhage, occurred only in definite APS patients. Corticosteroids were required by 40% of patients with thrombocytopenia. Manifestations in anticoagulated patients included white-matter lesions, nephropathy, superficial vein thrombosis, amaurosis fugax, and livedoid vasculopathy. Suspicion of progression towards systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) occurred in 19% of non-SLE individuals.

CONCLUSION

'Clinical non-criteria' patients displayed significant treatment use, predominantly haematological involvement, and less severe manifestations than definite APS controls. Some patients may additionally progress to future SLE. The impact of certain manifestations flags them as potential future contributors to classifying individuals as definite APS.

AB0631 Impact of Behçet’s Syndrome on work activity and productivity: results from a sub-analysis of the BODI Project cohort

Background

Behçet’s Syndrome (BS) is a multisystem recurring inflammatory disorder characterised by a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations, which can vary from limited mucocutaneous lesions up to severe and even life-threatening events.

Objectives

To evaluate the impact of BS on the patients’ work activity and productivity.

Methods

A sub-cohort of 148 patients from the original Behçet’s syndrome Overall Damage Index (BODI) Project study was enrolled. The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: General Health (WPAI:GH) questionnaire was administered. Demographics, disease duration, comorbidity, major organ involvement, ongoing therapy, Behçet's Disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF), Physician Global Assessment (PGA), Patient Global Assessment (PtGA), and the BODI were recorded. Multiple regression models were built to investigate the independent effect of BS features on WPAI.

Results

Overall, 97 (65.6%) out of 148 patients who completed the WPAI:GH questionnaire resulted working for pay; 22 out of 97 (27.8%) patients reported missing work in the past week due to their health, accounting for a mean (SD) of 34.4% (17.8) of their working time (absenteeism). The only factor significantly associated with absenteeism in multivariate analysis was the presence of ocular damage, as assessed by the BODI (β 0.255, p = 0.027).

Although 93 patients reported that they worked in the previous week, mean 27.3% (30.7) of their actual work productivity was impaired due to their health problem (presenteeism), with only 37 (38.5%) patients reporting no such loss. Factors associated with work impairment were female gender (β 0.319, p = 0.001), higher PtGA (β 0.298, p = 0.002), and an increased BODI score in the last 2 years follow-up (β 0.212 for one-point increased BODI score, p = 0.024).

Finally, 99 (66.9%) of the total 148 patients complained of a daily activity impairment, reporting that a mean of 33.3% (30.6) of their regular daily activities had been prevented due to their health problems. Factors significantly associated with patients’ daily activity impairment were younger age at enrolment (β 0.187, p = 0.021), higher BDCAF disease activity (β 0.235, p = 0.002) and fibromyalgia (β 0.324, p = 0.033).

Conclusion

BS can lead to missing work time and significantly affect both the patient’s work productivity and daily activities. Active disease seems to be one of the major determinants together with a higher burden of damage and the association of some specific comorbidities, such as fibromyalgia.

Table 1.

WPAI:GH questionnaire results

Variablesn°Mean (SD)All patients148Patients working for pay97Percent work time missed due to health977.9 (21.7)Percent work time missed due to health (patients with missed time >0) *2234.4 (17.8)Patients who actually worked in the past seven days**93Percent impairment while working due to health9327.3 (30.7)Percent impairment while working due to health (pts with % impairment while working > 0) ***5645.4 (27.2)Percent activity impairment due to health14833.3 (30.6)Percent activity impairment due to health (those with % activity impairment >0)9949.8 (23.9)

* Patients working for pay who missed at least on hour of work, 22/97 = 22.7%.

** Patients working for pay, but who worked for > 0 hours in the last week = 93/97

*** Patients with impairment while working > 0 among patients who actually worked in the previous 7 day = 56/93.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0636 Relationship between organ damage and impairment of health-related quality of life in patients with Behçet’s Syndrome: results from a longitudinal extension of the BODI Project

Background

Preventing accrual of organ damage represents a primary goal in the treatment of Behçet’s Syndrome (BS), as it may result in impairment of other outcomes, including the health-related quality of life (HR-QoL).

Objectives

The objective of this study was to investigate whether the recent accrual of organ damage, rather than its extent at a single time point, correlate with an impairment of the HR-QoL.

Methods

A sub-analysis of data from patients recruited in the longitudinal phase of the BODI Project validation cohort was performed. The HR-QoL and damage were measured by the Short-form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) and the BS Overall Damage Index (BODI), respectively, at the baseline visit and at a follow-up (FU) 24 ±3 months later. Then the possible increase of damage over FU was assessed by calculating the difference between the BODI score (Δ-BODI) in the two visits. Then, the relationship between the Δ-BODI and the individual and summary domains of the SF-36 was analysed by building multivariate regression models, including age, gender, concomitant fibromyalgia and/or depression, current disease activity as assessed by the BDCAF, as confounding variables.

Results

From the BODI validation cohort, 147 patients were recruitable for this sub-analysis;73 (49.8%) were males. The mean (SD) age and disease duration at enrolment were, respectively, 46.2 (12.4) and 13.4 (10.1) years. BODI score did not influence the SF-36 domains assessed at the baseline visit. In contrast, a significant correlation was recorded between the Δ-BODI and the following SF-36 domains: physical function (PF) (β -0.158 for 1 unit increase in BODI score, p 0.025), role physical (RP) (β -0.150, p 0.044), general health (GH) (β -0.199, p 0.004), role emotional (RE) (β -0.180, p 0.001), mental health (MH) (β -0.244, p 0.001), and the mental components summary (MCS) (-0.203, p 0.008)(Figure 1). Gender, age, fibromyalgia and disease activity were also confirmed to significantly influence HR-QoL (Table 1).

Table 1.

Multiple regression for the assessment of the relationship between Δ-BODI and SF-36 domains

Δ-BODIMaleAgeFBMDPRBDCAFPhysical function (PF)-0.158 (p 0.025)0.180 (p 0.010)-0.299 (p<0.001)-0.358 (p<0.001)-- (p 0.552)-0.141 (p 0.044)Role-physical (RP)-0.150 (p 0.044)0.154 (p 0.039)-0.212 (p 0.001)-0.278 (p<0.001)-- (0.086)-0.251 (p<0.001)Body-pain (BP)-- 0.8680.266 (p<0.001)-0.286 (p<0.001)-0.276 (p<0.001)-- (p 0.799)-262 (p<0.001)General health (GH)-0.199 (p 0.004)0.187 (p 0.010)-- (0.136)-0.296 (p<0.001)-- (0.861)-0.352 (p<0.001)Vitality (VT)-- (p 0.868)0.238 (p 0.001)-0.178 (p 0.008)-0.213 (0.002)-- (p 0.855)-0.371 (p<0.001)Social function (SF)-- (p 0.239)0.299 (p 0.004)-0.166 (p 0.024)-0.242 (p 0.001)-- (0.831)-0.202 (p 0.010)Role emotional (RE)-0.180 0.003)0.158 (p 0.047)-0.157 (p 0.048)-0.233 (p 0.003)-- (0.531)-0.191 (p 0.016)Mental health (MH)-0.244 (p 0.001)-- (p 0.142)-- (p 0.142)-0.292 (p<0.001)-- (p 0.073)-0.254 (p 0.001)Physical Component Summary (PCS)-- 0.1050.229 (p 0.001)-0.298 (p<0.001)-0.296 (p<0.001)-0.254 (p<0.001)Mental Component Summary (MCS)-0.203 (p 0.008)-- (p 0.068)-- (0.246)-0.255 (p 0.001)-- (0.122)-0.302 (p<0.001)

FBM: fibromyalgia; DPR: depression

Conclusion

The recent accrual of organ damage, rather than its extent assessed in a single visit, is associated with impairment of different aspects of heath related quality of life, especially those mental related. Such phenomenon is similar to that observed in other systemic rheumatic disease, may be due to coping mechanisms.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0630 Assessment of organ damage accrual in Behçet's Syndrome over 2-year follow-up: results from the BODI Project longitudinal extension

Background

Preventing accrual of organ damage is a major goal in the treatment of Behçet’s Syndrome (BS). The BS Overall Damage Index (BODI) is the first damage assessment tool developed and preliminarily validated for BS.

Objectives

To assess the prevalence, extent, and determinants of organ damage accrual in the BODI validation cohort over 24 months of follow-up.

Methods

Overall, 189 patients from the multicenter BODI cohort underwent a 24 ±3 months follow-up (FU) visit. Demographics, ongoing medication, Behçet’s Disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF) score, Physician (PGA) and Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of disease activity, disease relapsing (defined by any treatment change due to increased disease activity), and the BODI score were recorded. Damage accrual was defined as any increase ≥1 in the BODI score between baseline and follow-up visit (Δ-BODI). Logistic regression models were built to identify factors associated with BODI damage accrual.

Results

The mean age (standard deviation) at enrolment and the disease duration was 46.2 (12.1) and 10.8 (8.3) years, respectively, and 92/189 (48.7%) patients were males. During 24 months, 36 (19.0%) patients had an increase in the BODI score of at least 1 point (mean increase of 1.7 points). The BODI score increased from 1.6 (2.1) to 1.9 (2.1), with a mean Δ-BODI of 0.3 (0.8). Overall, 61 new BODI items of damage were recorded (Figure 1); 22 (34%) were steroid-related (diabetes, osteoporotic fractures, cataract). Factors independently associated with increased BODI score were longer glucocorticoids exposure (OR 1.01 per month, 95%CI 1.01-1.02, p<0.001), and occurrence of flares (OR 3.1, 95%CI 1.1-8.9, p = 0.035), whereas stable treatment with conventional and/or biologic immunosuppressants was negatively associated with an increase in the BODI score (OR 0.19, 95% 0.07-0.97, p <0.001) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Determinants of organ damage accrual over 2 years of follow-up.

Univariate analysisMultivariate analysisCandidate determinantsΔ-BODI ≥1 (n 36)Δ-BODI = 0 (n 153)pOR (95%CI)pMales16 (44.4%)76 (49.7%)0.572Age at enrolment56.2 (42.9-62.0)46.6 (35.4-53.1)0.001----Disease duration12.9 (7.1-22.0)11.1 (5.4-21.2)0.483Major organ involv.22 (61.1%)72 (47.1%)0,129BDCAF at BL3 (0-5)2. (0-5)0.365BDCAF at FU visit3.0 (3-5)3 (0-7)0.188GC duration112 (26.0-147.0)24.0 (8.0-72.0)<0.0011.012 (1.006-1.018<0.001cIS or TNFì ever24 (66.7%)133 (86.9%)0.0040.194 (0.073-0.972)<0.001Relapse9 (25.0%)20 (13.1%)0.0703.093 (1.066-8.972)0.038BODI score at BL1.0 (0-2.0)1 (0-2)0.579

Continuous variables are presented as median (IQR). Dichotomic variable are presented as n (%). BODI, Behçet’s Syndrome Overall Damage Index. FU, follow-up. cIS, conventional immunosuppressant. Δ-BODI increase of BODI score from baseline to the FU visit.

Conclusion

Despite the relatively high disease duration in the studied cohort, organ damage accrual was recorded in a relevant proportion of patients. BODI proved to capture the damage associated with major determinants such as inadequate control of disease activity and prolonged exposure to glucocorticoids.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

Usefulness of high-frequency ultrasonography in the evaluation and monitoring of sclerosing dermatoses: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Monitoring of disease activity in sclerosing dermatoses (SD) can be challenging and tools to support clinical decision-making are lacking.

AIM

To analyse the impact of high-frequency ultrasonography (HFUS) on the clinical management of SD and to describe the US characteristics of disease activity.

METHODS

This was a cohort study of patients with various SD [morphoea, systemic sclerosis (SS) and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD)] who underwent HFUS between January 2017 and August 2019. HFUS criteria for diagnosing active SD were increased Doppler vascularity and/or meeting all B-mode greyscale US signs of activity. Discordance in SD activity between HFUS and clinical examination was evaluated at the time of the first US assessment. Changes in patient management were instituted after HFUS were recorded.

RESULTS

In total, 72 patients (31 with morphoea, 19 with SS and 22 with cGvHD), who underwent 163 HFUS sessions in total, were included. All HFUS-active morphoea lesions exhibited increased vascularity, and all HFUS-active SS exhibited dermal thickening and dermal hypoechogenicity. HFUS-active cGvHD displayed increased dermal thickness and loss of definition of the dermal-hypodermal junction, and there were signs of panniculitis in 80% of cases and of increased vascularity in 70%. Discordance in disease activity between clinical and HFUS evaluation was found in 17 (23.6%) patients. Changes in clinical management after HFUS were made for 14 (19.4%) patients: treatment discontinuation for 6 patients (42.9%), treatment initiation for 5 (35.7%), medication change for 2 (14.3%) and skin biopsy taken for 1 (7.1%).

CONCLUSION

HFUS seems an efficacious support tool in the monitoring of SD activity with a notable impact on clinical management. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the impact of HFUS-supported management changes on SD outcomes.

AB0340 PATIENTS WITH LABORATORY CRITERIA OF ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME AND “NON-CRITERIA” MANIFESTATIONS: A MULTICENTER STUDY

Background:

Patients with laboratory criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and presenting only “non-criteria” clinical manifestations are scarcely described in the literature [1-3].

Objectives:

To describe a cohort of these patients, portraying potential associations between “non-criteria” manifestations, antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and treatments.

Methods:

Retrospective analysis of patients with aPL positivity fulfilling APS criteria assessed in two tertiary European hospitals between 2005 and 2020. Those without criteria clinical manifestations but with the presence of “non-criteria” manifestations were included.

Results:

A total of 75 patients were analyzed. The predominant non-obstetric involvements were hematologic (thrombocytopenia, hemolytic anemia) and “mild” neurological (white matter lesions, migraine), with an absence or near absence of cutaneous, cardiac, pulmonary and more severe neurologic manifestations (Table 1). In obstetric morbidity, two spontaneous abortions before 10 weeks and infertility were the more frequent manifestations. LA positivity was positively associated with non-obstetric manifestations (OR=4.2, 95% CI 1.5-11.9; p=0.007) while an aCL profile was associated with obstetric manifestations (OR 7.0, 95% CI 2.3-21.3; p=0.001). A suspicion of progression towards SLE was considered plausible in 13 (19%) of non-SLE individuals. Twelve (40.0%) of patients with thrombocytopenia as their only hematological involvement required corticosteroids. History of infertility (OR 6.1, 95% CI 1.3-28; p=0.02) and IVF recurrent failure (OR 6.5, 95% CI 1.2-36.3; p=0.032) were associated with pregnancy treatment with LMWH/LDA combination. Among patients under anticoagulation, clinical manifestations included brain white matter lesions, APS nephropathy, superficial vein thrombosis, amaurosis fugax, and livedoid vasculopathy. A higher value of GAPSS was observed in patients with non-obstetric (median 9, IQR 5-13) in comparison to those with obstetric manifestations (median 5, IQR 4-5.5).

Conclusion:

The present article stresses the clinical relevance of these patients, with an impression that at least some manifestations will contribute in the future to the classification of individuals as definite APS.

References:

[1]J. Alijotas-Reig et al., Comparative study of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS) and non-criteria obstetric APS (NC-OAPS): report of 1640 cases from the EUROAPS registry. Rheumatology (Oxford), (2019).

[2]M. Fredi et al., Risk Factors for Adverse Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Women With Confirmed aPL Positivity: Results From a Multicenter Study of 283 Pregnancies. Front Immunol9, 864 (2018).

[3]E. Sevim et al., Characteristics of Antiphospholipid Antibody Positive Patients in AntiPhospholipid Syndrome Alliance for Clinical Trials and InternatiOnal Networking. Arthritis Care & Researchn/a.

Table 1.

“Non-criteria” clinical manifestations present in the analyzed population.

Clinical manifestationn (%)Non-obstetricn = 49Thrombocytopenia34 (69.4)Coombs´ positivity11 (22.4)Migraine11 (22.4)Hemolytic anemia5 (10.2)Brain MRI white matter lesions5 (10.4)Raynaud´s phenomenon5 (10.2)Superficial vein thrombosis4 (8.1)Evans syndrome4 (8.1)Amaurosis fugax3 (6.1)APS nephropathy2 (4.1)Livedo reticularis1 (2.0)Livedoid vasculopathy1 (2.0)Memory lapses1 (2.0)Pseudo-multiple sclerosis1 (2.0)Sensorineural hearing loss1 (2.0)Splinter hemorrhages1 (2.0)Obstetricn = 38Two spontaneous abortions <10 weeks16 (42.1)Infertility14 (36.8)≥ 2 or more IVF failures11 (28.9)Late IUGR (>34 weeks)7 (18.4)Premature birth between 34 and 37 weeks7 (18.4)Placental ischemia5 (13.1)Late preeclampsia (>34 weeks)3 (8.0)Placental abruption2 (5.3)Placental hematoma2 (5.3)

Abbreviations –aCL: anticardiolipin antibodies; AI: Autoimmune; AID: Autoimmune disease; aPL: Antiphospholipid antibodies; IUGR: Intrauterine growth restriction; IVF: in vitro fertilization; LA: Lupus anticoagulant.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS1408 REPRODUCIBILITY OF A NEW AUTOMATIC SYSTEM (CAPILLARY.IO) IN THE ANALYSIS OF NAILFOLD CAPILLAROSCOPY IMAGES

Background:

Nailfold Capillaroscopy is a simple, inexpensive and non-invasive technique that allows microvascular damage to be observed, gaining recent importance in the diagnosis, monitoring and prognosis of many diseases with microangiopathy. However, the variability in the results interpretation has led to the development of new computerized systems that allow the automatic analysis of capillaroscopic images.

Objectives:

to compare the degree of agreement between the automatic system Capillary.io and a gold standard obtained from the agreement of 9 expert capillaroscopists and to know the degree of the interobserver reliability To demonstrate the validity of the system to detect normal and enlarged capillaries, hemorrhages, megacapillaries, ramifications and tortuosities.

Methods:

a cross-sectional study was performed in which 300 random and anonymous nailfold capillaroscopic images (1165 capillaries) were analyzed by 9 experienced observers. The degree of interobserver agreement was calculated from the 5 users. Likewise, the system performed an automatic assessment of the images and their agreement with the gold standard was calculated (interobserver agreement greater than 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 successively). The validity of the program for each variable was also analyzed using sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratios, as well as their degree of agreement using the weighted kappa statistic (95% CI, p <0.05). The programs used for statistical calculations were SPSS 22.0 and EPIDAT 3.0.

Results:

the degree of interobserver agreement was 76.5% for the agreement of 5 or more observers, progressively decreasing to 15.4% for the 9 observers. Capillary.io obtained higher levels of agreement, reaching 97.7% for the 9 observers. Statistically significant results were obtained in the automated detection of all the morphological alterations analyzed Capillary.io presented a sensitivity (S) of 79.82% and a specificity (E) of 82% in the recognition of normal capillaries. The automatized system was able to recognize enlarged capillaries with a sensitivity of 86.97% and a specificity of 81.38%. Megacapillaries were detected with 89.41% sensitivity and 78.75% specificity. Similarly, the system was able to detect tortuosities (S 66.94%; E 67.71%), ramifications (S 54.34%; E 58.61%) and hemorrhages (S 71.36; E 73.97%).

Conclusion:

Capillary.io demonstrated a high degree of agreement with the gold standard, stronger with greater consensus among observers. It was able to detect with great sensitivity and specificity hemorrhages and megacapillaries, very relevant alterations in microangiopathies.

References:

[1]Roldán LMC, Franco CJV, Navas MAM. Capillaroscopy in systemic sclerosis: A narrative literature review. Rev Colomb Reumatol; 2016; 23: 250-8.

[2]Ingegnoli F, Gualtierotti R, Lubatti C, Bertolazzi C, Gutierrez M, Boracchi P, et al. Nailfold capillary patterns in healthy subjects: A real issue in capillaroscopy. Microvasc Res. 2013;90:90-5.

[3]Cutolo M, Pizzorni C, Secchi ME, Sulli A. Capillaroscopy. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2008; 22:1093-108.

[4]Tavakol ME, Fatemi A, Karbalaie A, Emrani Z, Erlandsson BE. Nailfold Capillaroscopy in Rheumatic Diseases: Which Parameters Should Be Evaluated? BioMed Res Int. 2015; 2015: 974530.

[5]Smith V, Herrick AL, Ingegnoli F, Damjanov N, De Angelis R, Denton CP, et al. Standardisation of nailfold capillaroscopy for the assessment of patients with Raynaud’s phenomenon and systemic sclerosis. Autoimmunity Reviews. 2020; 19: 102458.

Disclosure of Interests:

Borja Gracia Tello Shareholder of: Co-founder and shareholder of Capillary.io., Eduardo Ramos Shareholder of: Co-founder and shareholder of Capillary.io., Carmen Pilar Simeón-Aznar: None declared, Vicent Fonollosa Pla: None declared, Alfredo Guillén-Del-Castillo: None declared, Albert Selva-O’Callaghan: None declared, Luis Sáez-Comet: None declared, Elena Martínez Robles: None declared, Juan José Rios: None declared, Gerard Espinosa: None declared, Jose Antonio Todolí Parra: None declared, Jose Luis Callejas-Rubio: None declared, Norberto Ortego: None declared, Begoña Marí-Alfonso: None declared, Mayka Freire: None declared, Patricia Fanlo: None declared

POS0767 CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS, TREATMENT, AND OUTCOMES OF “NON-CRITERIA” ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME IN COMPARISON WITH DEFINITE ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Background:

Patients with laboratorial or clinical manifestations suggestive of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) but not fulfilling the classification criteria [1] constitute a challenge in clinical practice.

Objectives:

To establish a comparison between patients with “non-criteria” versus those with definite APS on the frequency of clinical manifestations, prescribed therapies and reported outcomes.

Methods:

A systematic review of observational studies comparing “non-criteria” with definite APS patients was performed searching 4 electronic databases. Data was extracted on clinical manifestations, therapies and outcomes. Studies were analyzed globally and, where possible, grouped under four potential “non-criteria” APS subsets. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed.

Results:

Fourteen studies were included, assessing a total of 3,238 participants (Table 1). In the meta-analysis, no difference was detected in the frequency of arterial events or thrombosis recurrence between “non-criteria” and definite APS. However, a lower frequency of venous events was observed in “non-criteria” patients (risk ratio [RR]=0.9; 95%CI 0.7-1.0; p-value=0.047, I2=0%; Q Cochran p-value=0.226). Regarding obstetric morbidity, no difference was observed in most outcomes, but previous history of intrauterine growth restriction was less frequent (RR=0.7; 95%CI=0.6-0.9; p-value=0.003, I2=0%; Q Cochran p-value=0.228) and the risk of prematurity in followed pregnancies lower in “non-criteria” patients. There was no significant difference in treatment frequency between groups, except for less use of hydroxychloroquine in “non-criteria” APS (RR=0.7; 95%CI=0.5-0.9; p-value=0.007, I2=46.5%; Q Cochran p-value=0.642). There was no significant difference in the risk of fetal loss between groups either with or without treatment (Figure 1). It should be noted that significant heterogeneity was observed in some outcomes across the studied categories. Most studies focused on “seronegative” and “incomplete laboratory” APS.

Table 1.

Description of studies included in the systematic review.

Author, year (reference)Number of PatientsDefinite APSNC-APS(global)Mekinian, 2012 [2]2553Rodriguez-Garcia, 2012 [3]8767Conti, 2014 [4]2524Ofer-Shiber, 2015 [5]126117Mekinian, 2016 [6]8396Omar, 2018 [7]3030Signorelli, 2017 [8]7713Fredi, 2018 [9]8581Litvinova, 2018 [10]4117Alijotas-Reig, 2019 [11]1000640Ferreira, 2020 [12]1521Liu, 2020 [13]19290Li, 2020 [14]3494Lo, 2020 [15]1224

Abbreviations – APS: Antiphospholipid Syndrome; NC-APS: Non-criteria antiphospholipid syndrome.

Conclusion:

This review suggests an absence of marked differences in most of the evaluated variables regarding clinical manifestations, treatment and outcomes between “non-criteria” and definite APS. These results should be interpreted with caution in light of the low-quality evidence available and heterogeneity observed in some outcomes.

References:

[1]S Miyakis et al., J Thromb Haemost 4 (2), 295 (2006).

[2]A Mekinian et al., Journal of Reproductive Immunology 94 (2), 222 (2012).

[3]JL Rodriguez-Garcia et al., Ann Rheum Dis 71 (2), 242 (2012).

[4]F Conti et al., J Immunol Res 2014, 389601 (2014).

[5]S Ofer-Shiber and Y Molad, Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 26 (3), 261 (2015).

[6]A Mekinian et al., Semin Arthritis Rheum 46 (2), 232 (2016).

[7]G Omar et al., Egyptian Rheumatologist 40 (2), 111 (2018).

[8]F Signorelli et al., Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 76, 887 (2017).

[9]M Fredi et al., Front Immunol 9, 864 (2018).

[10]E Litvinova et al., Front Immunol 9, 2971 (2018).

[11]J Alijotas-Reig et al., Rheumatology (Oxford) (2019).

[12]TG Ferreira et al., Clin Rheumatol 39 (4), 1167 (2020).

[13]T Liu et al., Arthritis Res Ther 22 (1), 33 (2020).

[14]X Li et al., Clinical Rheumatology (2020).

[15]HW Lo et al., Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 244, 205 (2020).

Figure 1.

Forest plot of studies included in the meta-analysis regarding pregnancy and treatment outcomes.

Acknowledgements:

The authors wish to thank Helena Donato, from the Documentation Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, for her assistance performing the search for the systematic review.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS1371 BIOLOGICAL THERAPY IN REFRACTORY NEUROBEHÇET’S DISEASE. MULTICENTER STUDY OF 42 PATIENTS

Background:

Neuro-Behçet’s disease (NBD) is a severe complication of Behcet’s disease (BD). Despite well-established therapies with glucocorticoids and conventional immunosuppressants (cIS), a significant proportion of patients are refractory.

Objectives:

To assess efficacy and safety of biologic therapy (BT) in NBD refractory to glucocorticoids and at least one cIS.

Methods:

Open-label multicenter study of refractory NBD from 23 different referral Spanish Hospitals. Main outcome was neurological response. Secondarily, analytical efficacy was measured by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and Hemoglobin (Hb) at baseline, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.

Results:

We studied 42 patients (21 women/ 21 men; mean age 40.4±10.8 years). HLA B51 was positive in 15 out of 37 (40.5%) patients tested. Non-neurological manifestations were oral ulcers (n=41, 97.6%), genital ulcers (n=31, 73.8%), skin lesions (n=28, 66.7%), arthralgia (n=27, 64.3%), uveitis (n=21, 50.0%), arthritis (n=9, 21.4%), venous thrombosis (n=9, 21.4%) and arterial thrombosis (n=4, 9.5%). The underlying neurologic manifestation were parenchymal (n=34, 81.0 %) and non-parenchymal (n=17, 40.5%) involvement (Table 1). The first BT used was infliximab (n=20), adalimumab (n=13), golimumab (n=3), tocilizumab (n=3) and etanercept (n=2).

After 58.2±51.4 months since initiation of BT, neurological response was complete (n=27; 64.3%), or partial (n=11, 26.1%) (Figure 1). Only 4 (9.5%) patients did not respond. After 6 months of BT, ESR improved from.31.5±25.6 to 15.3±11.9 mm/h (p=0.005), CRP from 1.4 [0.2-12.8] to 0.3[0.1-3] mg/dL (p= 0.002) and Hb from 13.1±1.6 to 13.8±1.3 g/dL (p=0.005).

Figure 1.

Neurological clinical response to biological therapy.

Primary failure was observed in 16 (38.1%) patients due to inefficacy (n=11, 68.8%) or adverse effects (n=5, 31.3%). Similarly, causes of secondary failure (n=6, 14.3%) were inefficacy (n=5, 83.3%) and adverse effects (n=1, 16.7%). No serious adverse effects were observed.

Conclusion:

BT, especially monoclonal anti-TNF drugs, seems to be effective and safe in refractory NBD.

Table 1.

Neurologic manifestation of 42 patients with refractory neurobehçet's disease treated with biologic therapy.

Parenchymal subtype, n (%)34 (81.0)-Hemiparesis8 (19.1)-Polineuropathy8 (19.1)-Encephalopathy6 (14.3)-Cognitive impairments4 (9.5)-Optic neuropathy4 (9.5)-Ophtalmoparesis4 (9.5)-Other cranial nerve involvement3 (7.1)-Hemihypoesthesia3 (7.1)-Cerebellar dysphasia1 (2.4)-Cerebellar involvement1 (2.4)-Non-steroidal psicosis1 (2.4)Non-parenchymal subtype, n (%)17 (40.5)-Aseptic meningitis12(28.6)-Thrombosis4 (9.5)-Intracranial hypertension1 (2.4)

Disclosure of Interests:

Alba Herrero-Morant: None declared, José Luis Martín-Varillas Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Pfizer, Lilly, Janssen, and Celgene, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Iñigo González-Mazón: None declared, Olga Maiz: None declared, Ana Blanco Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Julio Sánchez: None declared, Norberto Ortego: None declared, Enrique Raya Speakers bureau: MSD, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Alejandro Olive: None declared, Anahy Brandy-Garcia: None declared, Águeda Prior-Español: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Elvira Diez Alvarez: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Jenaro Graña: None declared, Álvaro Seijas-López: None declared, ANA URRUTICOECHEA-ARANA: None declared, Angel Ramos Calvo: None declared, Concepción Delgado Beltrán: None declared, Marta Loredo Martínez: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Ignacio Torre-Salaberri: None declared, J. Narváez Speakers bureau: Bristol-Myers Squibb, José Luis Andréu Sánchez: None declared, Olga Martínez González: None declared, Ricardo Gómez de la Torre: None declared, Sabela Fernández: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Gerard Espinosa: None declared, Miguel Á. González-Gay Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene and MSD, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, Jansen and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, Sanofi, Lilly and MSD, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, and Roche

POS1409 AUTOMATED DETECTION OF SCLERODERMIFORM PATTERNS USING CAPILLARY.IO

Background:

A nailfold capillaroscopy procedure is a non-invasive, low-cost, and well-established examination that can be used to diagnose several rheumatic autoimmune diseases and support the necessary follow-up of patients. While the clinical implications of the technique are known, a rigorous and in-depth examination of nailfold capillaries remains as one of the major challenges to produce new advances in research and diagnosis, due to practical limitations for analysing the whole nailfold area of each patient. The difference between the different patterns established by Maricq and Cutolo makes it possible to predict the evolution that the patient will present. We introduce Capillary.io, an automatic image reading system able to recognize capillaries in images obtained with any microscope, generate automatic measurements of each capillary and take advantage of this information to report capillary morphology and patterns.

Objectives:

to determine the ability to detect active and early scerodermiform patterns of Capillary.io.

Methods:

Forty-nine complete capillaroscopies, reported by expert capillaroscopists according to the different patterns manually (gold standard), were compared with the pattern detection capability of Capillary.io. A scoring system based on the algorithm of the Spanish Capillaroscopy Study Group (GREC) was performed and interpreted by capillary.io for the global interpretation of each of the capillaroscopies analyzed.

Results:

Overall, 37 of the 49 capillaroscopies reported agreed with the diagnosed pattern (75.51%). Separately, the early pattern presented a concordance of 77.27% and the active pattern of 74.07%. In reference to the findings detected by the Capillary.io system, the mean overall density was 5.01 capillaries/mm in the group with the active pattern compared to 6.46 capillaries/mm in the early pattern. The density of dilations and megacapillaries was 2.81/mm and 1.21/mm in the active pattern group versus 4.69/mm and 0.4/mm in the early pattern group. Global diameters were greater in the active pattern group with an apical mean of 37.3 μm compared to 28.5 μm in the early pattern subgroup.

Conclusion:

Capillary.io is a simple, easy-to-learn web system for interpreting capillaroscopic images of nail folds. It can be a very useful tool to standardize the interpretation of capillaroscopic images, not only individually for each capillary, but also jointly through the detection of different patterns.

References:

[1]Chen K, Wang J, Pang J, Cao Y, Xiong Y, Li X, et al. MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmark. arXiv preprint arXiv:190607155 2019;.

[2]Cutolo M, Pizzorni C, Sulli A. Nailfold videocapillaroscopy assessment of microvascular damage in systemic sclerosis - Reply. The Journal of Rheumatology 2000 11;27:2722–2723.

[3]Cutolo M, Trombetta AC, Melsens K, Pizzorni C, Sulli A, Ruaro B, et al. Automated assessment of absolute nailfold capillary number on videocapillaroscopic images: Proof of principle and validation in systemic sclerosis. Microcirculation 2018 May;25(4):e12447.

[4]Smith V, Vanhaecke A, Herrick AL, Distler O, Guerra MG, Denton CP, et al. Fast track algorithm: How to differentiate a “scleroderma pattern” from a “non-scleroderma pattern”. Autoimmu- nity Reviews 2019 nov;18(11):102394.

[5]Tavakol ME, Fatemi A, Karbalaie A, Emrani Z, Erlandsson BE. Nailfold Capillaroscopy in Rheumatic Diseases: Which Parameters Should Be Evaluated? BioMed Research International 2015;2015:1–17.

Disclosure of Interests:

Eduardo Ramos Shareholder of: Co-founder and shareholder of Capillary.io, Alfredo Guillén-Del-Castillo: None declared, Carmen Pilar Simeón-Aznar: None declared, Borja Gracia Tello Shareholder of: Co-founder and shareholder of Capillary.io, Vicent Fonollosa Pla: None declared, Albert Selva-O’Callaghan: None declared, Luis Sáez-Comet: None declared, Elena Martínez Robles: None declared, Juan José Rios: None declared, Gerard Espinosa: None declared, Jose Antonio Todolí Parra: None declared, Jose Luis Callejas-Rubio: None declared, Norberto Ortego: None declared, Begoña Marí-Alfonso: None declared, Mayka Freire: None declared, Patricia Fanlo: None declared

Impact of novel coronavirus infection in patients with uveitis associated with an autoimmune disease: Result of the COVID-19-GEAS patient survey

Introduction

The objective of these study is to know the characteristics of COVID-19 in patients with uveitis associated with Systemic Autoimmune Disease (SAD) through telematic survey.

Material and methods

Internal Medicine Society and Group of Systemic Autoimmune disease conducted a telematic survey of patients with SAD to learn about the characteristics of COVID-19 in this population.

Results

A total of 2,789 patients answered the survey, of which 28 had a diagnosis of uveitis associated with SAE. The majority (82%) were female and caucasian (82%), with a mean age of 48 years. The most frequent SAEs were Behçet’s disease followed by sarcoidosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. 46% of the patients were receiving corticosteroid treatment at a mean prednisone dose of 11 mg/day. Regarding infection, 14 (50%) patients reported symptoms compatible with SARS-CoV-2 infection. RT-PCR was performed on the nasopharyngeal smear in two patients and in one of them (4%) it was positive.

Conclusions

Both asymptomatic and symptomatic COVID-19 patients with ASD-associated UNI had received similar immunosuppressive treatment.

Scleritis and sclerokeratitis associated with IgA vasculitis: A case series

Purpose

To describe a case series of scleritis associated with IgA vasculitis (IgAV) at a tertiary referral center.

Observations

Three men with scleritis associated with IgAV were identified: one with anterior scleritis alone, one with anterior scleritis and peripheral ulcerative keratitis (sclerokeratitis), and one with anterior and posterior scleritis. Visual acuity was preserved except from the patient who developed posterior scleritis. Ocular pain was the main symptom at presentation. All patients had a previous history of palpable purpura, but only one was aware of his underlying IgAV. Laboratory results revealed microhematuria and proteinuria with normal urinary β₂ microglobulin levels and negative serum ANCAs. Skin or kidney biopsy demonstrated leukocytoclastic vasculitis or glomerulonephritis with dominant IgA immune deposits.

Conclusions and Importance

Although uncommon, IgAV should be included in the differential diagnosis of anterior scleritis alone or associated with peripheral ulcerative keratitis or posterior scleritis, even in systemically asymptomatic patients. Urinalysis should not be underestimated in assessment of scleritis to detect early stages of glomerular disease. Scleritis may be the first manifestation whose study may lead to the diagnosis of IgAV. Multidisciplinary approach is necessary to prevent irreversible organ damage such as renal failure.

Multidisciplinary care and units for uveitis in the internal medicine departments in Spain: Survey of the Systemic Autoimmune Diseases Group

OBJECTIVE

To identify the multidisciplinary uveitis units in which internal medicine departments participate in collaboration with ophthalmology departments in Spain.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a multicentre, observational cross-sectional study that collected information using a structured survey sent by email to 1015 partners of the Systemic Autoimmune Diseases Workgroup of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (GEAS-SEMI) from the 1st to the 31st of March 2017.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 21 support units/consultations for the ophthalmology departments. Seventeen (81%) of the units were specific internal medicine-ophthalmology consultations, and 5 (24%) units had been created in the past 5 years. A median of 460 patients were assessed per unit by the end of the year.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows, for the first time in Spain, the important and close collaboration between ophthalmologists and internists, especially in highly specialised national reference institutions.

Impact of novel coronavirus infection in patients with uveitis associated with an autoimmune disease: result of the COVID-19-GEAS patient survey

Introducción

El objetivo de este estudio es conocer las características de la COVID-19 en pacientes con uveítis asociada a enfermedades autoinmunes sistémicas (EAS) mediante una encuesta telemática.

Material y métodos

La Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna por medio del Grupo de Trabajo de Enfermedades Autoinmunes realizó una encuesta telemática a pacientes con EAS para conocer las características de la COVID-19 en esta población.

Resultados

Un total de 2.789 pacientes contestaron la encuesta, de los que 28 tenían un diagnóstico de uveítis asociada a una EAS. La mayoría (82%) eran mujeres y caucásicas (82%), con una media de 48 años. Las EAS más frecuentes fueron la enfermedad de Behçet seguida de la sarcoidosis y del lupus eritematoso sistémico. El 46% de los pacientes estaban recibiendo tratamiento con corticoides a una dosis media de prednisona de 11 mg/día. Respecto a la infección, 14 (50%) pacientes referían síntomas compatibles con infección por SARS-CoV-2. Se realizó RT-PCR en el frotis nasofaríngeo en dos pacientes y en uno de ellos (4%) fue positivo.

Conclusiones

Los pacientes con UNI asociada a EAS tanto los asintomáticos como los sintomáticos de COVID-19 habían recibido de forma similar tratamiento inmunosupresor.

Tuberculosis-Related Uveitis in Patients under Anti-TNF-alpha Therapy: A Case Series

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (anti-TNF) have emerged as an effective treatment in noninfectious uveitis (NIU). Anti-TNF may increase the predisposition to infectious disease as tuberculosis (TB). TB-related uveitis in the context of an uveitogenic concurrent systemic immune-mediated disease under anti-TNF treatment remain a diagnostic challenge, deserving special focus on this rare context. Retrospective chart review of patients on anti-TNF drugs for systemic immune-mediated diseases that developed a multicentric microbiologically confirmed active TB with concurrent intraocular involvement.Three patients were recorded. Screening for TB before starting anti-TNF resulted negative in two patients. The other patient had received anti-tuberculous treatment in the past. All showed a microbiologically confirmed extraocular TB after unexpected atypical reactivation of the uveitis shifting to chronic granulomatous pattern.Specialists should be aware of TB reactivation, even with previous negative screening, when ocular uveitis signs and activity do not match with the expected pattern in a patient on anti-TNF drugs.

SAT0316 ANTI-PM/SCL ANTIBODIES IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS: CLINICAL ASSOCIATIONS IN THE RESCLE COHORT

Background:

Anti-PM/Scl antibodies are associated to systemic sclerosis (SSc) but are not specific to SSc. The true prevalence of anti-PM/Scl antibodies in SSc is unknown, ranging from 2.5% to 12.5%. An association between anti-PM/Scl antibodies with muscular involvement, pulmonary fibrosis, calcinosis, and a relatively benign prognosis have been described.

Objectives:

To compare the clinical manifestations and prognosis of SSc patients according the presence of anti-PM/Scl antibodies in the cohort of RESCLE (Spanish Scleroderma Registry).

Methods:

From the Spanish Scleroderma Study Group database, we selected patients in whom anti-PM/Scl antibodies had been tested. We compared demographic features, clinical manifestations, laboratory characteristics, and survival data between patients according the anti-PM/Scl antibodies status.

Results:

72 out of 947 (7%) patients tested positive for anti-PM/Scl antibodies. As presenting SSc manifestations, patients with anti-PM/Scl antibodies had higher prevalence of puffy fingers (11% versus 2%; p=0.002) and arthralgias (11% versus 4%; p=0.03), and lower prevalence of Raynaud’s phenomenon (65% versus 82%, p=0.002). Regarding cumulative manifestations, myositis (51% versus 15%; p<0.001), arthritis (43% versus 22%; p=0.001), and interstitial lung disease (ILD) (60% versus 45%, p=0.014) were more prevalent in patients with anti-PM/Scl antibodies. In fact, those patients with anti-Pm/Scl antibodies presented with FVC (77.4% ± 23.1% versus 85.8% ± 23,1%; p=0.006) and more severe ILD defined as FVC <70% (41% versus 24%; p=0.004). Death rate was similar in patients with and without PM/Scl antibodies (18% versus 17%; p=0.871).We did not find differences in terms of death rate nor in the causes of death (SSc and non-SSc related) according to the anti-PM/Scl antibodies profile.The 5- and 10-years survival rates of patients with anti-PM/Scl antibodies were 91% and 82% respectively, without differences with those without these antibodies (93% and 85%, respectively).

Conclusion:

In Spanish SSc patients, the presence of anti-PM/Scl antibodies confer a distinctive clinical profile. However, anti-PM/Scl antibodies do not play a role in the prognosis of these patients.

References:

[1]Stochmal A, Czuwara J, Trojanowska M, Rudnicka L. Antinuclear antibodies in systemic sclerosis: an update. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2020;58(1):40-51. doi: 10.1007/s12016-018-8718-8.

Acknowledgments:

We gratefully acknowledge all investigators who are part of the RESCLE Registry. We also thank the RESCLE Registry Coordinating Centre, S&H Medical Science Service, for their quality control data, logistic and administrative support and Prof. Salvador Ortiz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid and Statistical Advisor S&H Medical Science Service for the statistical analysis of the data presented in this paper.

Disclosure of Interests

Nerea Iniesta-Arandia: None declared, Gerard Espinosa Speakers bureau: Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Janssen, Boehringer, Rovi, Alfredo Guillen del Castillo: None declared, Carles Tolosa Consultant of: Actelion pharmaceuticals, GSK, MSD., Gema Maria Lledó: None declared, Dolores Colunga Argüelles Consultant of: Actelion pharmaceuticals, GSK, MSD., Cristina González-Echávarri: None declared, Luis Sáez-Comet: None declared, Norberto Ortego: None declared, Jose Antonio Vargas-Hitos: None declared, Manuel Rubio-Rivas: None declared, Mayka Freire: None declared, Juan José Rios: None declared, Monica Rodriguez-Carballeira: None declared, Luis Trapiella Martínez: None declared, Vicent Fonollosa Pla Speakers bureau: Actelion, Carmen Pilar Simeón-Aznar Consultant of: Actelion pharmaceuticals, GSK, MSD., on behalf of RESCLE Investigators, Autoimmune Diseases Study Group (GEAS): None declared

FRI0487 APREMILAST IN MONOTHERAPY OR COMBINED IN NON-ULCER MANIFESTATIONS OF BEHÇET’S DISEASE. NATIONAL MULTICENTER STUDY OF 34 REFRACTORY CASES OF CLINICAL PRACTICE

Background:

Apremilast (APR) has demonstrated efficacy in orogenital ulcers of Behçet´s disease (BD). Response of other clinical manifestations remains unknown.

Objectives:

To assess the efficacy and safety of APR in monotherapy or combined with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in non-aphthous ulcers of BD.

Methods:

National multicenter open-label study on 34 BD patients treated with APR at maintained standard dose of 30 mg twice daily.

Results:

From a cohort of 51 patients with APR by refractory orogenital ulcers of BD, we selected 34 (24 women/10 men, mean age 43.8±14.3 years), cases with another clinical manifestation/s.

Excluding CTs, colchicine or NSAIDs, APR was given in monotherapy (n=21) or combined with conventional and/or biologic DMARDs in 13 cases (5 methotrexate, 3 azathioprine, 3 hydroxychloroquine, 1 sulfasalazine, 1 dapsone, 2 tocilizumab, 1 IFX). Other active manifestations present at APR onset were: arthralgia/arthritis (16, true arthritis in 5), folliculitis/pseudofolliculitis (14), erythema nodosum (3), furunculosis (2), paradoxical psoriasis by TNFi (2), intestinal ileitis (2), deep venous thrombosis (2), leg ulcers (1), erythematosus and scaly skin lesions (1), fever (1), unilateral anterior uveitis (1) and neurobehçet (1).

After a median follow-up of 6 [3-12] months, folliculitis and ileitis improved, neurobehçet remained stable and musculoskeletal manifestations evolved in a variable way.(TABLE)

TABLE.

Conclusion:

In addition of orogenital ulcers, APR in monotherapy or combined, seems to be useful in skin manifestations of BD

Disclosure of Interests:

Alba Herrero Morant: None declared, Belen Atienza Mateo: None declared, J. Loricera: None declared, Vanesa Calvo del Rio Grant/research support from: MSD and Roche, Speakers bureau: Abbott, Lilly, Celgene, Grünenthal, UCB Pharma, José Luis Martín-Varillas Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Pfizer, Janssen and Celgene, Speakers bureau: Pfizer and Lilly, Gerard Espinosa: None declared, Jenaro Graña: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Trinidad Pérez Sandoval: None declared, Manuel Martín Martínez: None declared, Elvira Diez: None declared, María Dolores García-Armario: None declared, Esperanza Martínez: None declared, Ivan Castellví Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Kern Pharma, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Patricia Moya Alvarado: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Jaime Calvo Grant/research support from: Lilly, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Jansen, Celgene, Isabel de la Morena: None declared, Francisco Ortiz Sanjuán: None declared, José Andrés Román Ivorra: None declared, Ana Pérez Gómez: None declared, Alejandro Olive: None declared, Carolina Díez: None declared, Juan José Alegre: None declared, D Ybáñez-García Speakers bureau: Lilly, Roche, Sanofi, Ángels Martínez-Ferrer: None declared, Javier Narvaez: None declared, Ignasi Figueras: None declared, Ana Isabel Turrión: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Pilar Trénor: None declared, Soledad Ojeda Speakers bureau: AMGEN, LILLY, GEBRO, Miguel Á. González-Gay Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, MSD and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche, Consultant of: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen and MSD, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, Lilly and MSD

THU0307 RESPONSE OF BEHÇET’S REFRACTORY ORAL AND/OR GENITAL ULCERS TO APREMILAST IN COMBINATION VS MONOTHERAPY. NATIONAL MULTICENTER STUDY OF 51 CASES OF CLINICAL PRACTICE

Background:

Apremilast (APR) has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of oral and/or genital aphthous ulcers in Behçet´s disease (BD). Combination of APR to other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has not been assessed.

Objectives:

To compare the efficacy and safety of APR in monotherapy or combined with DMARDs in refractory BD.

Methods:

National multicenter open-label study on 51 BD patients with oral and/or genital ulcers refractory to conventional treatment.

Results:

We included 51 patients (35 women/16 men), mean age 44.7±13.2 years. Before APR, all patients had received several systemic conventional drugs. The main clinical symptoms for starting APR were oral (n=19) and genital (2) aphthous ulcers or both (30).

Excluding corticosteroids, colchicine or NSAIDs, APR was given at standard dose of 30 mg twice daily in monotherapy (n=31), or combined with conventional DMARDs in 16 cases (6 azathioprine, 5 methotrexate, 4 hydroxychloroquine, 4 sulfasalazine, 1 dapsone) or with biologic DMARDs in 4 (2 tocilizumab, 1 adalimumab, 1 infliximab). There were not found statistically significant differences in demographic features, previous therapy, clinical manifestations or reported adverse effects.

After a median follow-up of 6 [3-12] months, most of the patients experienced improvement of the orogenital ulcers in both groups (89.8% in the first 2 weeks), without statistically significant differences.(TABLE)

Conclusion:

APR leads to a rapid and maintained improvement in most patients with refractory BD orogenital ulcers. APR seems as effective and safe in monotherapy as combined.

TABLE:Week 1-2Week 4Month 6Month 12Month 24Outcome of oral and/or genital ulcers n, (%)Cn=19Mn=30Cn=19Mn=26Cn=12Mn=17Cn=7Mn=6Cn=1Mn=1 Complete resolution8 (42.1)11 (36.7)12 (63.2)20 (77)7 (58.4)14 (82.4)3 (42.8)3 (50)1 (100)1 (100) Partial resolution9 (47.4)16 (53.4)7 (36.8)3 (11.5)5 (41.6)2 (11.7)4 (57.2)3 (50)00 No response2 (10.5)3 (9.9)03 (11.5)01 (5.9)0000p value0.90.10.10.80.7

Abbreviations: C= combined; M= monotherapy; n= available data.

Disclosure of Interests:

Alba Herrero Morant: None declared, Belen Atienza Mateo: None declared, J. Loricera: None declared, Vanesa Calvo del Rio Grant/research support from: MSD and Roche, Speakers bureau: Abbott, Lilly, Celgene, Grünenthal, UCB Pharma, José Luis Martín-Varillas Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Pfizer, Janssen and Celgene, Speakers bureau: Pfizer and Lilly, Jenaro Graña: None declared, Gerard Espinosa: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Trinidad Pérez Sandoval: None declared, Manuel Martín Martínez: None declared, Elvira Diez: None declared, María Dolores García-Armario: None declared, Esperanza Martínez: None declared, Ivan Castellví Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Kern Pharma, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Patricia Moya Alvarado: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Jaime Calvo Grant/research support from: Lilly, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Jansen, Celgene, Isabel de la Morena: None declared, Francisco Ortiz Sanjuán: None declared, José Andrés Román Ivorra: None declared, Ana Pérez Gómez: None declared, Sergi Heredia: None declared, Alejandro Olive: None declared, Águeda Prior: None declared, Carolina Díez: None declared, Juanjo J Alegre-Sancho Consultant of: UCB, Roche, Sanofi, Boehringer, Celltrion, Paid instructor for: GSK, Speakers bureau: MSD, GSK, Lilly, Sanofi, Roche, UCB, Actelion, Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis, D Ybáñez-García Speakers bureau: Lilly, Roche, Sanofi, Ángels Martínez-Ferrer: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Ignasi Figueras: None declared, Ana Isabel Turrión: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Pilar Trénor: None declared, Soledad Ojeda Speakers bureau: AMGEN, LILLY, GEBRO, Miguel Á. González-Gay Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, MSD and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche, Consultant of: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen and MSD, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, Lilly and MSD

SAT0274 DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF FLARES DURING THE LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH BEHÇET’S DISEASE INCLUDED IN REGEB COHORT

Background:

Objectives:

To describe the clinical manifestations and treatment of flares during follow-up in patients with Behçet’s disease (BD) included in the REGEB cohort over the last decade.

Methods:

The Spanish Registry of BD or REGEB (REGistrode la Enfermedad de Behçet as Spanish nomenclature) Project Group was created by the Spanish Internal Medicine Society in 2009 with the aim of compiling a large cohort of Spanish patients with this rare disorder. By July 2012, REGEB has collected 635 BD patients with a multicentre, longitudinal and consecutive design. Diagnosis of BD was performed on the basis of the International Study Group criteria for BD. Since inclusion in the registry, patients have been followed prospectively and new flares have been recorded, defined as those clinical manifestations which have required initiation or modification of immunosuppressive treatment, or prednisone dose at or higher than 10mg/d of prednisone during more than 1 month.

Results:

A prospective follow-up of 326 patients included in the registry has been analysed. There are 182 women (56%) and their average age (SD) at the time of diagnosis was 33 (13) years. The majority of them were Caucasian (91%). The median follow-up time from BD diagnosis was 180 months, and the prospective follow-up period from the inclusion in the registry was 80 months. The cumulative clinical manifestations until the initial registration were oral ulcers in 100% of patients, genital ulcers in 221 (68%), arthritis in 147 (45%), erythema nodosum in 96 (29%), fever in 82 (25%), thrombosis in 74 (23%), anterior uveitis in 76 (23%), retinal vasculitis in 46 (14%), posterior uveitis in 35 (11%), aseptic meningitis in 32 (10%), and other neurological manifestations in 15 (5%) patients. One hundred and fifty-six (48%) patients received immunosuppressants and 47 (14%) biological therapy.

During follow up (period from the inclusion in the REGEB to the last visit) 68 (23%) patients presented at least a severe outbreak. The median time from the BD diagnosis to the first flare were 170 months. The main clinical manifestations were oral-genital ulcers in 43 (63%) patients, uveitis in 31 (45%), arthritis in 13 (19%), neurological in 16 (24%), vascular in 10 (15%), and gastrointestinal in 3 (4%) patients. Immunosuppressants were used in 37 (54%) patients and biological therapy in 14 (21%). Biological therapy was mostly used due to refractory disease, the majority of cases because ocular manifestations. There were no differences in terms of age, sex, race and previous clinical manifestations between patients who suffered from flares and those who did not. Flares were more frequent in patients who have received previous immunosuppressive or biological treatment (35% vs 13% and 48% vs 19%, respectively) (p<0.001 in both cases), probably reflecting a more severe disease.

Conclusion:

The long-term follow-up of BD patients from REGEB cohort showed that 10 years after diagnosis, a fifth of them may continue to present severe flares requiring systemic treatment. The use of biological therapy increased over time and their main indication was refractory disease.

Disclosure of Interests:

Mónica Rodríguez Carballeira: None declared, Roser Solans: None declared, Raquel Ríos Fernández: None declared, Begoña Escalante: None declared, Brenda Maure: None declared, Alejandra Fernández: None declared, Robert Hurtado: None declared, Rafael Boldova: None declared, Gerard Espinosa Speakers bureau: Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Janssen, Boehringer, Rovi

Multidisciplinary care and units for uveitis in the internal medicine departments in Spain: Survey of the Systemic Autoimmune Diseases Group

OBJECTIVE

To identify the multidisciplinary uveitis units in which internal medicine departments participate in collaboration with ophthalmology departments in Spain.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a multicentre, observational cross-sectional study that collected information using a structured survey sent by email to 1015 partners of the Systemic Autoimmune Diseases Workgroup of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (GEAS-SEMI) from the 1st to the 31st of March 2017.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 21 support units/consultations for the ophthalmology departments. Seventeen (81%) of the units were specific internal medicine-ophthalmology consultations, and 5 (24%) units had been created in the past 5 years. A median of 460 patients were assessed per unit by the end of the year.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows, for the first time in Spain, the important and close collaboration between ophthalmologists and internists, especially in highly specialized national reference institutions.