253
|
Overman L, Lai L, Cheong HT, Im GS, Park KW, Besch-Williford C, Murphy C, Green J, Prather R. 60 HISTOLOGICAL COMPARISONS BETWEEN NUCLEAR TRANSFER AND IN VIVO PORCINE EMBRYOS. Reprod Fertil Dev 2005. [DOI: 10.1071/rdv17n2ab60] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to the high rate of embryonic loss during a nuclear transfer pregnancy, cloning is considered a relatively inefficient process. However, as the only method of producing knockout domestic animals it is considered an invaluable tool for the biotechnical industry. By histologically comparing embryos at significant stages in the porcine pregnancy (Days 10, 12, and 14), factors contributing to embryonic loss may be revealed. Many consider the period between days 10 and 14 to be critical for determining survivability as the embryos must undergo rapid changes to signal for maternal recognition of pregnancy as well as adapt to a changing environment. This study included three gilts per stage of pregnancy and four different experimental groups for each stage studied: nonpregnant animals, in vivo-pregnant animals, nuclear transfer (NT) recipients, and in vitro-manipulated recipients (IVM). IVM embryos were in vitro-produced embryos upon which a mock nuclear transfer has been performed in an effort to account for the variability introduced by the actual technique. Animals either were bred or underwent a surgical embryo transfer on Day 1 of the estrous cycle according to their assigned experimental group. Fifty embryos were transferred per embryo transfer. Embryos were flushed from the uterine horns at time of collection (Day 10, 12, or 14) and preserved in 10% neutral buffered formalin. All embryonic disc diameters and gross morphology were evaluated as parameters for normal development. Embryos were then dehydrated in ethanol, paraffin-imbedded, sectioned, stained with hemotoxylin and eosin, and Day 14 embryos were evaluated for abnormalities such as higher-than-normal nucleoli numbers, increased cytoplasmic vacuoles, and higher than normal numbers of mitotic figures. All results were analyzed using ANOVA. There were significant differences (P < .0001) between diameters of the embryonic disks, with the diameters of the NT embryonic disks being smaller than those of the in vivo controls at all stages studied. Morphologically, the in vivo controls were more developmentally competent than their NT counterparts by the time they reached Day 14 (P = 0.0002) in that most had achieved the more advanced elongated form of growth as opposed to remaining spherical in shape. Significant histological differences in the number of nucleoli per nuclei were also found between in vivo and NT embryos (P = 0.05) as well as between MNT and NT embryos (P = 0.05). Therefore, nuclear transfer embryos develop at a much slower rate than their in vivo counterparts and often exhibit histological abnormalities that could contribute to this slow growth. Due to the apparent increase in nucleoli, it is possible that NT embryos are being arrested at a specific stage in the cell cycle.
The authors would like to acknowledge the Research Animal Diagnostic Laboratory for their help in imbedding, sectioning, and staining the embryos; Dr. Duane Keisler for running the hormone assays; and Kristin Whitworth, Melissa Samuel, Aaron Bonk, Jin-Geol Kim, Emily Fergason, David Wax, Tom Cantley, August Rieke, Randy Farrell, and Lacey Griesbaum for all their help.
Collapse
|
255
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral rehydration solution (ORS) is used to treat dehydration caused by diarrheal diseases including cholera. Reduced osmolarity formulations are safe and more effective than standard ORS for treating non-cholera diarrhea. As cholera causes rapid electrolyte loss, it is important to know if these benefits are similar for people with cholera. OBJECTIVES To compare the safety and efficacy of reduced osmolarity oral rehydration solution (ORS) with standard ORS for treating diarrhea due to cholera. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Infectious Disease Group Specialized Register (January 2004), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2004), EMBASE (1974 to January 2004), and LILACS (1982 to January 2004). We also contacted organizations and searched reference lists. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials comparing reduced osmolarity ORS with standard ORS for treating adults and children with acute diarrhea due to cholera. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria, assessed trial quality, and extracted data. We pooled binary data using relative risks (RR), continuous data using weighted mean difference (WMD) or the standardized mean difference (SMD), and presented the results with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN RESULTS For glucose-based reduced osmolarity ORS, seven trials (718 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Biochemical hyponatremia (serum sodium < 130 mmol/L) was more common with reduced osmolarity ORS (RR 1.67, CI 1.09 to 2.57; 465 participants, 4 trials); for severe biochemical hyponatremia (serum sodium < 125 mmol/L) this was not significant (RR 1.58, CI 0.62 to 4.04; 465 participants, 4 trials). No trials reported symptomatic hyponatremia or death. We found no statistically significant difference in the need for unscheduled intravenous infusion. Analyses separating children and adults showed no obvious trends. Two trials also examined rice-based ORS. In the reduced osmolarity group, duration of diarrhea was shorter (WMD -16.85 hours, CI -21.22 to -12.48; 102 participants, 2 trials). REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS In people with cholera, reduced osmolarity ORS is associated with biochemical hyponatremia when compared with standard ORS, although there are similar benefits in terms of other outcomes. Although this risk does not appear to be accompanied by serious consequences, the total patient experience in existing trials is small. Under wider practice conditions, especially where patient monitoring is difficult, caution is warranted.
Collapse
|
259
|
van Leth F, Conway B, Laplumé H, Martin D, Fisher M, Jelaska A, Wit FW, Lange JMA, Laplumé H, Lasala MB, Losso MH, Bogdanowicz E, Lattes R, Krolewiecki A, Zala C, Orcese C, Terlizzi S, Duran A, Ebensrteijn J, Bloch M, Russell O, Russell DB, Roth NR, Eu B, Austin D, Gowers A, Quan D, Demonty J, Peleman R, Vandercam B, Vogelaers D, van der Gucht B, van Wanzeele F, Moutschen MM, Badaro R, Grinsztejn B, Schechter M, Uip D, Netto EN, Coelho SS, Badaró F, Pilotto JH, Schubach A, Barros ML, Leite OHM, Kiffer CRV, Wunsch CT, Nunes D, Catalani A, de Cassia Alves LR, Dossin TJ, D'Alló de Oliveira MT, Martini S, Conway B, de Wet JJ, Montaner JSG, Murphy C, Woodfall B, Sestak P, Phillips P, Montessori V, Harris M, Tesiorowski A, Willoughby B, Voigt R, Farley J, Reynolds R, Devlaming S, Livrozet JM, Rozenbaum W, Sereni D, Valantin MA, Lascoux C, Milpied B, Brunet C, Billaud E, Huart A, Reliquet V, Charonnat MF, Sicot M, Esnault JL, Slama L, Staszewski S, Bickel M, Lazanas MK, Stavrianeas N, Mangafas N, Zagoreos I, Kourkounti S, Paparizos V, Botsi C, Clarke S, Brannigan E, Boyle N, Chiriani A, Leoncini F, Montella F, Francesco L, Ambu S, Farese A, Gargiulo M, Di Sora F, Lavria F, Folgori F, Beniowski M, Boron Kaczmarska A, Halota W, Prokopowicz D, Bander DB, Leszuzyszyn-Pynka MLP, Wnuk AW, Bakowska E, Pulik P, Flisiak R, Wiercinska-Drapalo A, Mularska E, Witor A, Antunes F, Sarmento RSE, Doroana M, Horta AA, Vasconcelos O, Andrews SM, Huisamen CB, Johnson D, Martin O, Bekker LG, Maartens G, Wilson D, Visagie CJ, David NJ, Rattley M, Nettleship E, Martin DJ, Keyser V, Moraites TM, Moorhouse MA, Pitt JA, Orrell CJ, Bester C, Parboosing R, Moodley P, Gathiram V, Woolf D, Bernasconi E, Magenta L, Cardiello P, Kroon E, Ungsedhapand C, Fisher M, Wilkins EGL, Stockwell E, Day J, Daintith RS, Perry N, Timaeus C, Intosh-Roffet JM, Powell A, Youle M, Tyrer M, Madge S, Drinkwater A, Cuthbertson Z, Carroll A, Becker S, Katner H, Rimland D, Saag MS, Thompson M, Witt M, Aguilar MM, LaVoy A, Illeman M, Guerrero M, Gatell J, Belsey E, Hirschel B, Potarca A, Cronenberg M, Kreekel L, Meester R, Khodabaks J, Botma HJ, Esrhir N, Farida I, Feenstra M, Jansen K, Klotz A, Mulder M, Ruiter G, Bass CB, Pluymers E, de Vlegelaer E, Leeneman (VCL) R, Carlier H, van Steenberge E, Hall D. Quality of Life in Patients Treated with First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy Containing Nevirapine And/Or Efavirenz. Antivir Ther 2004. [DOI: 10.1177/135965350400900512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective To assess whether differences in safety profiles between nevirapine (NVP) and efavirenz (EFV), as observed in the 2NN study, translated into differences in ‘health related quality of life’ (HRQoL). Design A sub-study of the 2NN study, with antiretro-viral-naive patients randomly allocated to NVP (once or twice daily), EFV or NVP+EFV, in addition to stavudine and lamivudine. Methods Comparing differences in changes of HRQoL over 48 weeks as measured with the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) questionnaire, using analysis of variance. Results The 2NN study enrolled 1216 patients. No validated questionnaires were available for 244 patients, and 55 patients had no HRQoL data at all, leaving 917 patients eligible for this sub-study. A total of 471 (51%) had HRQoL measurements both at baseline and week 48. The majority (69%) of patients without HRQoL measurements did, however, complete the study. The change in the physical health score (PHS) was 3.9 for NVP, 3.4 for EFV and 2.4 for NVP+EFV ( P=0.712). For the mental health score (MHS) these values were 6.1, 7.0 and 3.9, respectively ( P=0.098). A baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration (pVL) ≥100 000 copies/ml and a decline in pVL (per log10) were independently associated with an increase of PHS. An increase of MHS was only associated with pVL decline. Patients experiencing an adverse event during follow-up had a comparable change in PHS but a significantly smaller change in MHS, compared with those without an adverse event. Conclusions First-line ART containing NVP and/or EFV leads to an improvement in HRQoL. The gain in HRQoL was similar for NVP and EFV, but slightly lower for the combination of these drugs.
Collapse
|