Weight Cycling: More Questions than Answers

Most men and women who attempt to lose weight will regain any weight that is lost. This cycle of weight loss and regain - referred to as weight cycling is a recurrent phenomenon for many patients. With the increased frequency of obesity and the increased prescriptions for weight-loss practices without an associated increase in the success of weight-loss maintenance, the concerns about weight cycling have grown. Recent literature has focused on the possible physiologic and psychologic hazards of weight cycling. Review of both human and animal studies indicates no conclusive evidence about harmful effects of weight cycling. Most studies show no adverse effects on metabolism. Some observational studies indicate an association between variations in body weight and increased morbidity and mortality but do not distinguish between voluntary and involuntary weight-loss events. The studies of psychologic hazards have been limited, and little convincing information is available. Without more compelling evidence of the risks of weight cycling, warnings overriding safe, effective weight-loss treatments for the obese are unwarranted. Appropriately designed studies are urgently needed to assess the long-term efficacy of procedures and treatments that promote weight-loss maintenance and to provide further analyses of the effects of weight cycling.

Composition of weight loss in severely obese women: a new look at old methods

Seven severely obese, outpatient dieters lost weight (mean +/- SEM, 14 +/- 1 kg), and the composition of weight lost was determined by six different models. Total body water (TBW), total body potassium (TBK), and body density, bone mineral content, and fat as determined by dual photon absorptiometry (DPA) were measured while subjects were weight-stable, before and after weight loss. Fat loss was calculated by three two-compartment models (2C-TBW, 2C-TBK, and hydrodensitometry [2C-HD]), one three-compartment model (HD with correction for water content of fat-free mass [FFM], 3C), and one four-compartment model (HD with correction for water and mineral content of FFM, 4C), and was measured directly by DPA. Mean composition of weight loss was similar for all models (mean weight lost as fat: 89% for DPA, 91.5% for 4C, 89% for 3C, 88.6% for 2C-HD, and 87% for 2C-TBW) except 2C-TBK (weight lost as fat, 66%). There was a much wider range of individual values for the 2C-TBW and 2C-TBK models (17% to 138% and 18% to 93%, respectively) than for the multicompartment models (63% to 112%) and DPA (76% to 107%). Almost opposite results were obtained for the same individual when using the 2C-TBK and 2C-TBW models. The discrepancy between these models was due to the inverse relationship between changes in TBW and TBK in the group as a whole (r = -.34, NS). In addition, TBK loss was found to be dependent on the initial level of hyperinsulinemia, calculated as the area under the 2-hour oral glucose tolerance curve.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I (rhIGF-I) on total and free IGF-I concentrations, IGF-binding proteins, and glycemic response in humans

To examine the effects of repeated administration of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I (rhIGF-I) on IGF-I levels, free IGF-I pharmacokinetics, glycemic response, and IGF-binding proteins (IGFBP), we administered rhIGF-I (0.03 mg/kg iv bolus) to 12 healthy males each morning for 5 consecutive days. Serum was collected over 24 h on days 1 and 5 for measurement of total and free IGF-I, glucose, insulin, and IGFBP. Total IGF-I was measured by RIA after acid/ethanol extraction. Free IGF-I was separated from binding protein-complexed IGF-I using size exclusion high performance liquid chromatography before measurement by RIA. IGFBP were quantitated by optical densitometry of Western ligand blots. Total IGF-I increased significantly from 0-24 h after administration on day 1 (mean +/- SD, micrograms/L: 120 +/- 44 to 166 +/- 51, P = 0.0002) but did not increase significantly from 24 h on day 1 to 0 h on day 5 (166 +/- 51 to 178 +/- 62) or from 0-24 h on day 5 (178 +/- 62 to 209 +/- 89). The area under the total IGF-I concentration curve was greater on day 5 than day 1 (311 +/- 99 min.g/L vs. 249 +/- 77, P = 0.0001). There were no significant differences in free IGF-I concentration or pharmacokinetic parameters or in the degree or timing of hypoglycemia between days 1 and 5. Plasma insulin levels decreased significantly following rhIGF-I administration (day 1 baseline: 53 +/- 11 pmol/L, nadir: 18 +/- 6 pmol/L at 30 min, P = 0.003); day 5 baseline: 47 +/- 15 pmol/L, nadir: 16 +/- 8 pmol/L at 30 min, P = 0.0003. Western ligand blotting revealed the transient appearance of a 30-kilodalton band which migrates in a manner similar to IGFBP-1. This band was undetectable at baseline, peaked between 150 and 210 min after rhIGF-I administration, and diminished by 480-600 min. The response was similar on days 1 and 5. There were no substantial changes in the serum levels of any other IGFBP. In summary, repeated iv bolus administration of rhIGF-I increased the level of total circulating IGF-I without changing free IGF-I disposition or glycemic response. A 30-kilodalton IGFBP band, most likely IGFBP-1, appeared transiently following rhIGF-I administration, probably as a result of suppression of insulin levels. IGFBP-2, -3, and -4 were unaffected.

Independent effects of obesity and insulin resistance on postprandial thermogenesis in men

The putative blunted thermogenesis in obesity may be related to insulin resistance, but insulin sensitivity and obesity are potentially confounding factors. To determine the independent effects of obesity and insulin resistance on the thermic effect of food, at rest and after exercise, lean and obese men were matched at two levels of insulin sensitivity determined by insulin-stimulated glucose disposal (milligrams per kilogram fat-free mass [FFM] per minute) during the euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic (40 mU/m2.min) clamp: 5.4 mg/kg FFM for the lean and obese groups with low insulin sensitivity, and 8.1 mg/kg FFM for the groups with high insulin sensitivity. The two lean groups were matched for percent fat (approximately 15 +/- 1% fat), as were the two obese groups (approximately 33 +/- 2% fat). Energy expenditure was measured for 3 h in the fasting state and for 3 h after a 720-kcal mixed meal, each at rest and immediately after 1 h of cycling at 100 W. The thermic effect of food (TEF) was calculated as the postprandial minus fasting energy expenditure (kcal/3 h) during rest and after exercise. During rest, TEF was blunted by both obesity (24 +/- 5 and 34 +/- 6 kcal/3 h for obese groups with low and high insulin sensitivity vs. 56 +/- 6 and 74 +/- 6 kcal/3 h for the lean groups with low and high insulin sensitivity; P less than 0.01 lean vs. obese) and insulin resistance (insulin-resistant less than insulin-sensitive, at both levels of obesity; P less than 0.01). After exercise, TEF was also impaired in the obese (47 +/- 6 and 44 +/- 5 kcal/3 h for the insulin-resistant and -sensitive groups) and in the lean insulin-resistant (55 +/- 5 kcal/3 h), compared with the lean insulin-sensitive men (71 +/- 3 kcal/3 h), P less than 0.01. Compared with rest, TEF after exercise was improved, but not normalized, in both obese groups (P less than 0.05), but unchanged in the lean groups. These results suggest that both insulin resistance and obesity are independently associated with impaired TEF at rest, but the responsiveness of thermogenesis to exercise before a meal is related to the obese state and not independently to insulin resistance per se.

Effect of exercise training on insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism in lean, obese, and diabetic men

To clarify the impact of vigorous physical training on in vivo insulin action and glucose metabolism independent of the intervening effects of concomitant changes in body weight and composition and residual effects of an acute exercise session, 10 lean, 10 obese, and 6 diet-controlled type II diabetic men trained for 12 wk on a cycle ergometer 4 h/wk at approximately 70% of maximal O2 uptake (VO2max) while body composition and weight were maintained by refeeding the energy expended in each training session. Before and 4-5 days after the last training session, euglycemic hyperinsulinemic (40 mU.m2.min-1) clamps were performed at a plasma glucose of 90 mg/dl, combined with indirect calorimetry. Total insulin-stimulated glucose disposal (M) was corrected for residual hepatic glucose output. Body weight, fat, and fat-free mass (FFM) did not change with training, but cardiorespiratory fitness increased by 27% in all groups. Before and after training, M was lower for the obese (5.33 +/- 0.39 mg.kg FFM-1.min-1 pretraining; 5.33 +/- 0.46 posttraining) than for the lean men (9.07 +/- 0.49 and 8.91 +/- 0.60 mg.kg FFM-1.min-1 for pretraining and posttraining, respectively) and lower for the diabetic (3.86 +/- 0.44 and 3.49 +/- 0.21) than for the obese men (P less than 0.001). Insulin sensitivity was not significantly altered by training in any group, but basal hepatic glucose production was reduced by 22% in the diabetic men. Thus, when intervening effects of the last exercise bout or body composition changes were controlled, exercise training per se leading to increased cardiorespiratory fitness had no independent impact on insulin action and did not improve the insulin resistance in obese or diabetic men.

Body composition, not body weight, is related to cardiovascular disease risk factors and sex hormone levels in men

To clarify the independent relationships of obesity and overweight to cardiovascular disease risk factors and sex steroid levels, three age-matched groups of men were studied: (i) 8 normal weight men, less than 15% body fat, by hydrostatic weighing; (ii) 16 overweight, obese men, greater than 25% body fat and 135-160% of ideal body weight (IBW); and (iii) 8 overweight, lean men, 135-160% IBW, but less than 15% fat. Diastolic blood pressure was significantly greater for the obese (mean +/- SEM, 82 +/- 2 mmHg) than the normal (71 +/- 2) and overweight lean (72 +/- 2) groups, as were low density lipoprotein levels (131 +/- 9 vs. 98 + 11 and 98 + 14 mg/dl), the ratio of high density lipoprotein to total cholesterol (0.207 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.308 +/- 0.03 and 0.302 +/- 0.03), fasting plasma insulin (22 +/- 3 vs. 12 +/- 1 and 13 +/- 2 microU/ml), and the estradiol/testosterone ratio (0.076 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.042 +/- 0.02 and 0.052 +/- 0.02); P less than 0.05. Estradiol was 25% greater for the overweight lean group (40 +/- 5 pg/ml) than the obese (30 +/- 3 pg/ml) and normal groups (29 +/- 2 pg/ml), P = 0.08, whereas total testosterone was significantly lower in the obese (499 +/- 33 ng/dl) compared with the normal and overweight, lean groups (759 +/- 98 and 797 +/- 82 ng/dl). Estradiol was uncorrelated with risk factors and the estradiol/testosterone ratio appeared to be a function of the reduced testosterone levels in obesity, not independently correlated with lipid levels after adjustment for body fat content. Furthermore, no risk factors were significantly different between the normal and overweight lean groups. We conclude that (a) body composition, rather than body weight per se, is associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk factors; and (b) sex steroid alterations are related to body composition and are not an independent cardiovascular disease risk factor.

Thermic effects of food and exercise in lean and obese men of similar lean body mass

The thermic effect of food at rest, during 30 min of cycle exercise, and postexercise with two sequences of exercise and meal (before or after exercise) was compared in eight lean (mean +/- SE, 12.8 +/- 0.7% body fat) and eight obese men (29.7 +/- 0.6% fat) to determine whether exercise before or after a meal enhances thermogenesis. The groups were matched for age, height, and lean body mass (LBM) in order to study the relationship between thermogenesis and body fat independent of LBM. Metabolic rate was measured by indirect calorimetry on five mornings, in randomized order, after an overnight fast. Treatments on respective days were 1) 3-h rest, no meal; 2) 3-h rest after a 750-kcal mixed meal (14% protein, 31% fat, 55% carbohydrate); 3) during and 3 h after 30 min of cycling, no meal; 4) during and 3 h after 30 min of cycling, meal 30 min before exercise; and 5) 3 h after 30 min of cycling, meal immediately after exercise. The thermic effect of food, which is the fed minus fasted caloric expenditure, was significantly greater for the lean than the obese men under the resting (mean +/- SE 53 +/- 5 vs. 26 +/- 5 kcal over 3 h for the lean and obese groups, P less than 0.01), exercise (26 +/- 4 vs. 4 +/- 2 kcal over 30 min, P less than 0.01), and both postexercise conditions. However, for the lean men the thermic effect of food was significantly greater for the meal-before-exercise than the resting and the meal-after-exercise conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)