51
|
Gulia S, Kannan S, Ghosh J, Rath S, Maheshwari A, Gupta S. Secondary cytoreduction in platinum sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer: an individual patient level meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:1440-1447. [PMID: 37567595 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesize the role of secondary cytoreduction in recurrent ovarian cancer from the results of randomized studies. METHODS We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials which compared secondary cytoreductive surgery versus no surgery in patients with platinum sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. Individual patient data for overall survival and progression free survival were manually extracted from published survival curves, for whole study populations and subgroups based on completeness of surgical resection and bevacizumab use, using WebPlotDigitizer software. Overall survival and progression free survival curves for each study and the combined population were reconstructed from extracted data. RESULTS Three studies with 1249 patients were included, of whom complete resection was achieved in 427 (34.2%) patients. In individual patient data analysis of the whole study population with 562 deaths, there was no significant difference in overall survival between the surgery and no surgery groups (median 52.8 vs 52.1 months, respectively, hazard ratio (HR) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 1.11; p=0.5) but the surgery group had significantly longer progression free survival compared with the no surgery group (median 18.3 vs 14.4 months, respectively, HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.80; p<0.001). In subgroup analyses, overall survival was significantly longer in the complete cytoreduction subgroup compared with the no surgery group (median 62.0 vs 52.1 months, respectively, HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.92; p<0.001) while overall survival was significantly worse in the incomplete cytoreduction subgroup compared with the no surgery group (median 34.2 vs 52.1 months, respectively, HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.14; p<0.001). In the no bevacizumab subgroup, there was no significant overall survival difference between the surgery and no surgery groups (median 49.3 vs 47.0 months, HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.10; p=0.25). CONCLUSIONS Secondary cytoreductive surgery among women with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer did not lead to significant benefit in overall survival although it increased progression free survival. However, overall survival was significantly longer among patients in whom complete cytoreduction was possible compared with no surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seema Gulia
- Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Sadhana Kannan
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Biostatistics, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Jaya Ghosh
- Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Sushmita Rath
- Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Amita Maheshwari
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Gynecologic Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sudeep Gupta
- Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Siu AHY, Holyland M, Carey S, Steffens D, Ansari N, Koh CE. Is the measurement of sarcopenia associated with oncological disease in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy? ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:2186-2191. [PMID: 37525364 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal malignancies are challenging cancers to manage. While cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS and HIPEC), may offer a cure, it is a radical procedure associated with significant morbidity. Pre-emptive identification of deconditioned patients for optimization may mitigate surgical risk. However, the difficulty lies in identifying a cost-effective predictive tool. Recently, there has been interest in sarcopenia, which may occur due to malignancy. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of sarcopenia at predicting post-operative outcomes. METHODS A quaternary-centre retrospective study of CRS and HIPEC patients (2017-2020), were conducted to determine the association between pre-operative sarcopenia on oncological (peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI)) and surgical outcomes (complications). Sarcopenia from lumbar CT-images were measured using Slice-o-matic™. Statistical differences were analysed using Mann-Whitney U and Chi-squared test. RESULTS Cohort analysis (n = 94) found 40% had sarcopenia, majority were female (53.2%), and average age of 55 years. The major pathologies was colorectal cancer (n = 39, 41.5%), appendix adenocarcinoma (n = 21, 22.3%), and pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) (n = 19, 20.2%). Sarcopenia was associated with decreased weight, 72.7 versus 82.2 kg (P = 0.014) and shorter survival, 1.4 versus 2.1 years (95% CI, 1.09-3.05, P = 0.032). Median PCI (excluding PMP) was 11 (6-18) and median PCI (only PMP) was 25 (11-32). Post-operatively, sarcopenia patients experienced more complications (72.5% vs. 64.8%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION Pre-emptive identification of sarcopenia may be a useful prognostic indicator and predictor of post-operative outcomes in CRS and HIPEC. For oncological patients, sarcopenia may be an indicator of patients requiring targeted pre-operative rehabilitation, or advanced disease requiring further treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Hang Yue Siu
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Matthew Holyland
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sharon Carey
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniel Steffens
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nabila Ansari
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Cherry E Koh
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Gelissen JH, Adjei NN, McNamara B, Mutlu L, Harold JA, Clark M, Altwerger G, Dottino PR, Huang GS, Santin AD, Azodi M, Ratner E, Schwartz PE, Andikyan V. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5597-5609. [PMID: 37358686 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13757-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a treatment modality that aims to target the main site of tumor dissemination in ovarian cancer, the peritoneum, by combining the benefits of intraperitoneal chemotherapy with the synergistic effects of hyperthermia all during a single administration at the time of cytoreductive surgery. High-quality evidence currently only supports the use of HIPEC with cisplatin at the time of interval cytoreduction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. Many questions remain, including HIPEC's role at other timepoints in ovarian cancer treatment, who are optimal candidates, and specifics of HIPEC protocols. This article reviews the history of normothermic and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer and evidence regarding HIPEC implementation and patient outcomes. Additionally, this review explores details of HIPEC technique and perioperative care, cost considerations, complication and quality of life data, disparities in HIPEC use, and unresolved issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia H Gelissen
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Naomi N Adjei
- Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine Department, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Blair McNamara
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Levent Mutlu
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Justin A Harold
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mitchell Clark
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Gary Altwerger
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Peter R Dottino
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Gloria S Huang
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Alessandro D Santin
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Masoud Azodi
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Elena Ratner
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Peter E Schwartz
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Vaagn Andikyan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Finch L, Chi DS. An overview of the current debate between using minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for interval cytoreductive surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 2023; 34:e84. [PMID: 37545363 PMCID: PMC10482582 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e84] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The standard of care for treatment of advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer is primarily surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy, with the operative goal to achieve complete gross resection. Cytoreductive surgeries for epithelial ovarian cancer historically were performed via open laparotomy; however, as minimally invasive techniques became more widely accepted within gynecologic oncology, interest in employing this approach in the setting of cytoreductive surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer has grown. The purpose of this review was to examine the current debate between the use of minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy as an approach to interval cytoreductive surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. While numerous retrospective and feasibility studies have found comparable outcomes with respect to complete gross residual disease, progression-free survival, and overall survival between minimally invasive and laparotomy approaches to interval cytoreductive surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer, methodological challenges limit the utility of these data. Given potential risks of underestimating disease burden and failing to achieve complete resection using a minimally invasive approach, further rigorous studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery in this setting and to better define the subset of patients who would receive the greatest benefit from a minimally invasive approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey Finch
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Tappero S, Barletta F, Piccinelli ML, Cano Garcia C, Incesu RB, Morra S, Scheipner L, Tian Z, Parodi S, Dell'Oglio P, Palumbo C, Briganti A, De Cobelli O, Chun FKH, Graefen M, Longo N, Ahyai S, Saad F, Shariat SF, Suardi N, Borghesi M, Terrone C, Karakiewicz PI. The Association Between Cytoreductive Nephrectomy and Overall Survival in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma with Primary Tumor Size ≤4 cm. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:742-750. [PMID: 36906483 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unknown whether the survival benefit of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) applies to patients with primary tumor size ≤4 cm. OBJECTIVE To test the association between CN on overall survival (OS) of mRCC patients with primary tumor size ≤4 cm. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2006-2018), all mRCC patients with primary tumor size ≤4 cm were identified. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Propensity score matching (PSM), Kaplan-Meier plots, multivariable Cox regression analyses, and 6-mo landmark analyses addressed OS according to CN status. Sensitivity analyses examined specific populations of special interest: systemic therapy exposed versus naïve, clear-cell (ccmRCC) versus non-clear-cell (non-ccmRCC) mRCC histology, historical (2006-2012) versus contemporary (2013-2018), and young (≤65 yr) versus old (>65 yr) patients. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of 814 patients, 387 (48%) underwent CN. After PSM, the median OS was 44 versus 7 mo (Δ = 37 mo; p < 0.001) in CN versus no-CN patients. CN was associated with higher OS in overall population (multivariable hazard ratio [HR]: 0.30; p < 0.001) as well as in landmark analyses (HR: 0.39; p < 0.001). In all sensitivity analyses, CN was independently associated with higher OS: systemic therapy exposed, HR: 0.38; systemic therapy naïve, HR: 0.31; ccmRCC, HR: 0.29; non-ccmRCC, HR: 0.37; historical, HR: 0.31; contemporary, HR: 0.30; young, HR: 0.23; and old, HR: 0.39 (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The current study validates the association between CN and higher OS in patients with primary tumor size ≤4 cm. This association is robust, controlled for immortal time bias, and valid across systemic treatment exposure, histologic subtypes, years of surgery, and patient age. PATIENT SUMMARY In the current study, we tested the association between cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and small primary tumor size. We found a strong association between CN and survival, which persists even after several significant variations in patient and tumor characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Tappero
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Luca Piccinelli
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Cano Garcia
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Reha-Baris Incesu
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Stefano Parodi
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Carlotta Palumbo
- Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Nazareno Suardi
- Department of Urology, Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco Borghesi
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Carlo Terrone
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Ben-Yaacov A, Laks S, Zoabi G, Kirshenboim Z, Goldenshlger A, Hazzan D, Westrich G, Owda Y, Segev L, Nissan A, Goldenshluger M. Increased risk for incisional hernia following cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:2192-2196. [PMID: 37431168 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incidence of incisional hernias (IH) after midline laparotomy varies from 11% to 20%. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is potentially prone to hernias because a Xiphoid to pubis laparotomy incision performed on patients who have undergone previous abdominal surgeries with the addition of chemotherapy and its related adverse effects. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis on a prospectively maintained single institution database from March 2015 to July 2020. The inclusion criteria were patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC and had at least 6 months postoperative follow-up with post-operative cross-sectional imaging study. RESULTS Two hundred and one patients were included in the study. All patients underwent CRS-HIPEC with resection of previous scar and umbilectomy. Fifty-four patients were diagnosed with IH (26.9%). The major risk factors for IH in multivariate analysis were higher American society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) (OR 3.9, P = 0.012), increasing age (OR 1.06, P = 0.004) and increasing BMI (OR 1.1, P = 0.006). Most of the hernia sites were median (n = 43, 79.6%). Eleven (20.4%) patients had lateral hernias due to stoma incisions or drain sites. Most of the median hernias were at the level of the resected umbilicus 58.9% (n = 23). Five (9.3%) of the patients with IH necessitated an urgent surgical repair. CONCLUSION We have demonstrated that more than a quarter of the patients after CRS-HIPEC suffer from IH and up to 10% of them may require surgical intervention. More research is needed to find the appropriate intraoperative interventions to minimize this sequela.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Almog Ben-Yaacov
- General and Oncological Surgery Department C, Chaim Sheba Medical Center-Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Shachar Laks
- General and Oncological Surgery Department C, Chaim Sheba Medical Center-Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Ghanem Zoabi
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Zehavit Kirshenboim
- Department of Radiology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center-Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | | | - David Hazzan
- General and Oncological Surgery Department C, Chaim Sheba Medical Center-Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Gal Westrich
- General and Oncological Surgery Department C, Chaim Sheba Medical Center-Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Yazan Owda
- General and Oncological Surgery Department C, Chaim Sheba Medical Center-Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Lior Segev
- General and Oncological Surgery Department C, Chaim Sheba Medical Center-Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Aviram Nissan
- General and Oncological Surgery Department C, Chaim Sheba Medical Center-Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Michael Goldenshluger
- General and Oncological Surgery Department C, Chaim Sheba Medical Center-Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Hahn AW, Kotecha RR, Viscuse PV, Pieretti AC, Wiele AJ, Jonasch E, Lee CH, Gao J, Zurita AJ, Shah AY, Campbell MT, Sharma P, Motzer RJ, Russo P, Wood CG, Tannir NM, Voss MH, Karam JA, Hakimi AA, Msaouel P. Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for Patients with Metastatic Sarcomatoid and/or Rhabdoid Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Therapy. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:734-741. [PMID: 36863962 PMCID: PMC10460829 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with sarcomatoid and/or rhabdoid (S/R) dedifferentiation is a highly aggressive tumor with a poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) has shown significant treatment efficacy in this subtype. There remains uncertainly regarding the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) with S/R who received ICT. OBJECTIVE Here, we report the outcomes with ICT for patients with mRCC and S/R dedifferentiation by CN status. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective review was conducted of 157 patients with sarcomatoid, rhabdoid, or sarcomatoid plus rhabdoid dedifferentiation who received an ICT-based regimen at two cancer centers. INTERVENTION CN performed at any time point; nephrectomy with curative intent was excluded. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS ICT treatment duration (TD) and overall survival (OS) from ICT initiation were recorded. To address the immortal time bias, a time-dependent Cox regression model was generated that accounted for confounders identified by a directed acyclic graph as well as a time-dependent nephrectomy variable. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 118 patients underwent CN, and of them, 89 underwent upfront CN. The results did not contradict the supposition that CN does not improve ICT TD (hazard ratio [HR] 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-1.47, p = 0.94) or OS from ICT initiation (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.47-1.33, p = 0.37). In patients who underwent upfront CN compared with those who did not undergo CN, there was no association with ICT duration or OS (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.35-1.06, p = 0.08). A detailed clinical summary of 49 patients with mRCC and rhabdoid dedifferentiation is provided. CONCLUSIONS In this multi-institutional cohort of mRCC with S/R dedifferentiation treated with ICT, CN was not significantly associated with improved TD or superior OS when accounting for the lead time bias. There appears to be a subset of patients who derive meaningful benefit from CN, so improved tools for stratification prior to CN are needed to optimize outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY Immunotherapy has improved outcomes for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who have sarcomatoid and/or rhabdoid (S/R) dedifferentiation, which is an aggressive and uncommon feature; yet, the utility of a nephrectomy in this setting is unclear. We found that nephrectomy did not significantly improve survival or time on immunotherapy for these patients with mRCC and S/R dedifferentiation; yet, there may be a subset of patients who benefit from this surgical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew W Hahn
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ritesh R Kotecha
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul V Viscuse
- University of Virginia Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Alberto C Pieretti
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Eric Jonasch
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chung-Han Lee
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jianjun Gao
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amado J Zurita
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amishi Y Shah
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew T Campbell
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Padmanee Sharma
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert J Motzer
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul Russo
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christopher G Wood
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nizar M Tannir
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Martin H Voss
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jose A Karam
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - A Ari Hakimi
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Pavlos Msaouel
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; David H. Koch Center for Applied Research of Genitourinary Cancers, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Grotz TE, Yonkus JA, Thiels CA, Warner SG, McWilliams R, Mahipal A, Bekaii-Saab TS, Cleary SP, Kendrick ML, Truty MJ. ASO Visual Abstract: Cytoreduction with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemoperfusion for Pancreatic Cancer with Low-Volume Peritoneal Metastasis-Results from a Prospective Pilot Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5765. [PMID: 36864327 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13187-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Travis E Grotz
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Jennifer A Yonkus
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Cornelius A Thiels
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Susanne G Warner
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Amit Mahipal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Sean P Cleary
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Michael L Kendrick
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mark J Truty
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Deban M, Taqi K, Knapp GC, Soucisse M, Curry M, Sidéris L, Dubé P, Khaldi MA, Jedrzejko N, Porter G, Giacomantonio C, Hamilton T, MacNeill A, Mack L, Bouchard-Fortier A. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal mesothelioma: Canadian practices and outcomes. J Surg Oncol 2023; 128:595-603. [PMID: 37249154 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Peritoneal mesothelioma (PM) is a rare malignancy originating from the peritoneal lining. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the standard-of-care for patients with isolated PM. Due to a paucity of prospective data there are several different HIPEC protocols. The aims of this study are to describe the CRS and HIPEC protocols for PM and patient outcomes across Canada. METHODS A multicenter retrospective study was performed on patients diagnosed and treated for PM with CRS and HIPEC in four major peritoneal disease centers in Canada between 2000 and 2021. Data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, postoperative morbidity, recurrence, and survival were collected. RESULTS A total of 72 patients were identified. Mean age was 52 years (17-75) and 37.5% were male. Epithelioid (70.1%) and multicystic (13%) mesothelioma were the most common subtypes. Twenty-one patients (30%) were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CRS and HIPEC was performed in 64 patients (91.4%). Of these, the mean PCI was 22 (2-39) and cisplatin+doxorubicin was the most common HIPEC regimen (n = 33, 51.6%). A semi-closed coliseum technique was used in 68.8% of HIPECs and the mean duration of surgery was 486 min (90-1052). Clavien-Dindo III or IV complications occurred in 12 patients (16.9%). With a median follow-up of 24 months (0.2-104.4), we found a 5-year overall survival of 61% and a 5-year recurrence-free survival of 35%. CONCLUSION CRS and HIPEC is a safe and effective treatment modality for well-selected patients with PM, with some achieving prolonged survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melina Deban
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kadhim Taqi
- Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Matt Curry
- QE II Health Sciences Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Lucas Sidéris
- Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Pierre Dubé
- Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | - Geoff Porter
- QE II Health Sciences Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | | | - Trevor Hamilton
- Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andrea MacNeill
- Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lloyd Mack
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
60
|
Hara T, Furukawa J, Shiraishi Y, Okamura Y, Bando Y, Terakawa T, Harada K, Nakano Y, Fujisawa M. Impact of cytoreductive nephrectomy prior to combination therapy of ipilimumab plus nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol 2023; 30:746-752. [PMID: 37130778 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The efficacy of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been suggested in the real-world setting. We retrospectively examined the efficacy of CN prior to nivolumab plus ipilimumab systemic therapy for synchronous mRCC. METHODS Synchronous mRCC patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab at Kobe University Hospital or five affiliated hospitals between October 2018 and December 2021 were included in this study. We compared the outcomes of objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) between patients with CN prior to systemic therapy and without CN. In addition, patients were 1:1 matched by propensity scores accounting for factors associated with treatment assignment. RESULTS Twenty-one patients received CN prior to nivolumab plus ipilimumab (Prior CN) and 33 received nivolumab plus ipilimumab alone (Without CN). PFS of the Prior CN group was 10.8 months (95%CI 5.5-NR) and 3.4 months (95%CI 2.0-5.9) for the Without CN group (p = 0.0158). OS of Prior CN was 38.4 months (95%CI NR-NR) and 12.6 months (95%CI 4.2-30.8) for Without CN (p = 0.0024). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified prior CN as a significant prognostic indicator for PFS and OS. Moreover, propensity score matching analysis showed significant improvements in PFS and OS in Prior CN. CONCLUSIONS Patients who underwent CN prior to nivolumab plus ipilimumab systemic therapy for synchronous mRCC had a better prognosis than patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab alone. These results suggest the efficacy of prior CN for synchronous mRCC with ICI combination therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takuto Hara
- Department of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
- Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Junya Furukawa
- Department of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
- Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Yusuke Shiraishi
- Department of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
- Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Yasuyoshi Okamura
- Department of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
- Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Yukari Bando
- Department of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
- Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Terakawa
- Department of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
- Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Kenichi Harada
- Department of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
- Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Yuzo Nakano
- Department of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
- Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Masato Fujisawa
- Department of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
- Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Lopez-Ramirez F, Sardi A, Studeman K, King MC, Falla-Zuniga LF, Nikiforchin A, Baron E, Nieroda C, Gushchin V, Diaz-Montes T. Outcomes after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal dissemination from ovarian carcinosarcoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:1495-1503. [PMID: 37068984 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.03.230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) is an uncommon and aggressive malignancy, with poor response to current treatment approaches and no clear guidelines. Our aim is to evaluate the outcomes of an OCS cohort after cytoreduction with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). METHODS A descriptive cohort study was performed. Patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal dissemination from tubo-ovarian malignancies (1999-2021) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with confirmed histopathologic diagnosis of FIGO stage III/IV OCS were included. Overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Of 267 patients with tubo-ovarian malignancies reviewed, 7.5% (20/267) had OCS. Of these, 16 underwent CRS/HIPEC, including 9 for a new diagnosis and 7 for disease recurrence. Median age at surgery was 66.5 (IQR: 54.5-74.5) years. Nine (56.2%) patients were FIGO stage IV. Median peritoneal cancer index was 22 (IQR: 14-28). Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 15/16 (93.7%) cases. HIPEC agents included carboplatin (n = 7), cisplatin+doxorubicin (n = 4), and melphalan (n = 5). Major complications occurred in 4/16 (25%), with no 90-day mortality. Median follow-up was 41.8 months. Median PFS was 11.7 (95%CI: 10.5-17.1) months. Malignant bowel obstruction occurred in 3/16 (18.7%). Median OS from CRS/HIPEC was 21.3 (95%CI: 16.3-31.6) months, not reached for newly diagnosed vs 19.7 months for recurrent patients (p = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS CRS/HIPEC showed promising survival and abdominal disease control with low rates of malignant obstruction in patients with advanced stage OCS. Collaborative studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up may further elucidate the role of CRS/HIPEC in OCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe Lopez-Ramirez
- Mercy Medical Center, The Institute for Cancer Care, Department of Surgical Oncology, 227 St. Paul Place, Weinberg Building, 4th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| | - Armando Sardi
- Mercy Medical Center, The Institute for Cancer Care, Department of Surgical Oncology, 227 St. Paul Place, Weinberg Building, 4th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA.
| | - Kimberley Studeman
- Mercy Medical Center, Department of Pathology, 345 St Paul Place, The Mary Catherine Bunting Center, 7th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| | - Mary Caitlin King
- Mercy Medical Center, The Institute for Cancer Care, Department of Surgical Oncology, 227 St. Paul Place, Weinberg Building, 4th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| | - Luis Felipe Falla-Zuniga
- Mercy Medical Center, The Institute for Cancer Care, Department of Surgical Oncology, 227 St. Paul Place, Weinberg Building, 4th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| | - Andrei Nikiforchin
- Mercy Medical Center, The Institute for Cancer Care, Department of Surgical Oncology, 227 St. Paul Place, Weinberg Building, 4th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| | - Ekaterina Baron
- Mercy Medical Center, The Institute for Cancer Care, Department of Surgical Oncology, 227 St. Paul Place, Weinberg Building, 4th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| | - Carol Nieroda
- Mercy Medical Center, The Institute for Cancer Care, Department of Surgical Oncology, 227 St. Paul Place, Weinberg Building, 4th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| | - Vadim Gushchin
- Mercy Medical Center, The Institute for Cancer Care, Department of Surgical Oncology, 227 St. Paul Place, Weinberg Building, 4th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| | - Teresa Diaz-Montes
- Mercy Medical Center, Ovarian Cancer Institute, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, 227 St. Paul Place, Weinberg Building, 6th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21202-2001, USA
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Silberman JN, Bercow AS, Gockley AA, Eisenhauer EL, Sisodia R, Randall T, Del Carmen MG, Goodman A, Castro CM, Melamed A, Bregar AJ. Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for low-grade serous ovarian cancer in the United States. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 175:60-65. [PMID: 37327540 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe trends in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) use for low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) and to quantify associations between NACT and extent of cytoreductive surgery. METHODS We identified women treated for stage III or IV serous ovarian cancer in a Commission on Cancer accredited program between January 2004-December 2020. Regression models were developed to evaluate trends in NACT use for LGSOC, to identify factors associated with receipt of NACT, and to quantify associations between NACT and bowel or urinary resection at the time of surgery. Demographic and clinical factors were used for confounder control. RESULTS We observed 3350 patients who received treatment for LGSOC during the study period. The proportion of patients who received NACT increased from 9.5% in 2004 to 25.9% in 2020, corresponding to an annual percent change of 7.2% (95% CI 5.6-8.9). Increasing age (rate ratio (RR) 1.15; 95% CI 1.07-1.24), and stage IV disease (RR 2.66; 95% CI 2.31-3.07) were associated with a higher likelihood of receiving NACT. For patients with high-grade disease, NACT was associated with a decrease in likelihood of bowel or urinary surgery (35.3% versus 23.9%; RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.65-0.71). For LGSOC, NACT was associated with a higher likelihood of these procedures (26.6% versus 32.2%; RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.08-1.42). CONCLUSION NACT use among patients with LGSOC has increased from 2004 to 2020. While NACT was associated with a lower rate of gastrointestinal and urinary surgery among patients with high-grade disease, patients with LGSOC receiving NACT were more likely to undergo these procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason N Silberman
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
| | - Alexandra S Bercow
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Allison A Gockley
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Eric L Eisenhauer
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Rachel Sisodia
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Thomas Randall
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Marcela G Del Carmen
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Annekathryn Goodman
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Cesar M Castro
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Alexander Melamed
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Wentworth-Douglass Hospital, Dover, NH, United States
| | - Amy J Bregar
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Wentworth-Douglass Hospital, Dover, NH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Dietz MV, Quintelier KLA, van Kooten JP, de Boer NL, Vink M, Brandt-Kerkhof ARM, Verhoef C, Saeys Y, Aerts JGJV, Willemsen M, Van Gassen S, Madsen EVE. Adjuvant dendritic cell-based immunotherapy after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a phase II clinical trial. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:e007070. [PMID: 37536940 PMCID: PMC10401259 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) improves survival outcomes, but recurrence rates remain high. Dendritic cell-based immunotherapy (DCBI) showed promising results in patients with pleural mesothelioma. The primary aim of this trial was to determine feasibility of adjuvant DCBI after CRS-HIPEC. METHODS This open-label, single-center, phase II clinical trial, performed in the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam, the Netherlands, included patients with epithelioid MPM. 4-6 weeks before CRS-HIPEC leukapheresis was performed. 8-10 weeks after surgery, DCBI was administered three times biweekly. Feasibility was defined as administration of at least three adjuvant vaccinations in 75% of patients. Comprehensive immune cell profiling was performed on peripheral blood samples prior to and during treatment. RESULTS All patients who received CRS-HIPEC (n=16) were successfully treated with adjuvant DCBI. No severe toxicity related to DCBI was observed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12 months (IQR 5-23) and median overall survival was not reached. DCBI was associated with increased proliferation of circulating natural killer cells and CD4+ T-helper (Th) cells. Co-stimulatory molecules, including ICOS, HLA-DR, and CD28 were upregulated predominantly on memory or proliferating Th-cells and minimally on CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) after treatment. However, an increase in CD8+ terminally differentiated effector memory (Temra) cells positively correlated with PFS, whereas co-expression of ICOS and Ki67 on CTLs trended towards a positive correlation. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant DCBI after CRS-HIPEC in patients with MPM was feasible and safe, and showed promising survival outcomes. DCBI had an immune modulatory effect on lymphoid cells and induced memory T-cell activation. Moreover, an increase of CD8+ Temra cells was more pronounced in patients with longer PFS. These data provide rationale for future combination treatment strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NTR7060; Dutch Trial Register (NTR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle V Dietz
- Department of Surgical oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katrien L A Quintelier
- Data Mining and Modeling for Biomedicine Group, VIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research Elewaut Unit Molecular Immunology and Inflammatory Unit, Gent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Job P van Kooten
- Department of Surgical oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nadine L de Boer
- Department of Surgical oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Madelief Vink
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yvan Saeys
- Data Mining and Modeling for Biomedicine Group, VIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research Elewaut Unit Molecular Immunology and Inflammatory Unit, Gent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Marcella Willemsen
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Sofie Van Gassen
- Data Mining and Modeling for Biomedicine Group, VIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research Elewaut Unit Molecular Immunology and Inflammatory Unit, Gent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Eva V E Madsen
- Department of Surgical oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Reese SW, Khaleel S, Silagy A, Xie A, Eismann L, Vazquez-Rivera K, Oparanozie A, Patil S, Coleman J, Motzer R, Kotecha RR, Russo P, Voss MH, Hakimi AA. Prognostic Factors for Survival in Patients Undergoing Surveillance After Cytoreductive Nephrectomy. J Urol 2023; 210:273-279. [PMID: 37167628 PMCID: PMC10726735 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The clinical course of patients being placed on surveillance in a cohort of systemic therapy-naïve patients who undergo cytoreductive nephrectomy is not well documented. Thus, we evaluated the clinical course of patients placed on surveillance following cytoreductive nephrectomy and identified predictors of survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this large single-institution study, we retrospectively analyzed metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients who underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy followed by surveillance. Predictors of survival were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method with a log-rank test. Patients were risk stratified based on IMDC (International mRCC Database Consortium) and number of metastatic sites (Rini score), with IMDC score ≤1 and ≤2 metastatic organ sites considered favorable risk. Primary end point was systemic therapy-free survival. Secondary end points included intervention-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival. RESULTS Median systemic therapy-free survival was 23.6 months (95% CI: 15.1-40.6), intervention-free survival was 11.8 months (95% CI: 8.0-18.4), cancer-specific survival was 54.2 months (95% CI: 46.2-71.4), and overall survival 52.4 months (95% CI: 40.3-66.8). Favorable-risk patients compared to unfavorable-risk patients had longer systemic therapy-free survival (50.6 vs 11.1 months, P < .01), survival (25.2 vs 7.3, P < .01), and cancer-specific survival (71.4 vs 46.2 months, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS Using risk stratification based on IMDC and number of metastatic sites, surveillance in favorable-risk patients can be utilized for a period without the initiation of systemic therapy. This approach can delay patients' exposure to the side effects of systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen W Reese
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sari Khaleel
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew Silagy
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amy Xie
- Computational Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lennert Eismann
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Katiana Vazquez-Rivera
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Arnold Oparanozie
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sujata Patil
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Jonathan Coleman
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Robert Motzer
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ritesh R Kotecha
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Paul Russo
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Martin H Voss
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - A Ari Hakimi
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Shen XP, Xie M, Wang JS, Guo X. Efficacy of immunotherapy-based immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy vs. deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2023; 27:5684-5691. [PMID: 37401306 DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202306_32808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy (CRN) followed by programmed cell death factor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors vs. deferred CRN after the administration of 4 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy using nivolumab preceding the debulking and postoperative chemotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS We recruited 84 patients with primary mRCC admitted to our Oncology Department from 2018 to 2020 and randomized them 1:1 to receive either CRN followed by nivolumab (control group) or 4 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy using nivolumab before CRN and postoperative chemotherapy (study group), with 42 patients in each group. The primary clinical endpoints were the clinical efficacy and safety of the PD-1 antibody. Clinical outcomes were assessed 3 months after treatment. RESULTS Patients were followed-up for 10-52 months, with a median follow-up period of 40.50 months. The control group reported 2 cases of complete remission and 10 cases of partial remission, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 28.57% (12/42). The study group reported 4 cases of complete remission and 14 cases of partial remission with an ORR of 42.86% (18/42). No significant differences in the ORR were identified between the two groups (p > 0.05). Progression-free survival of the patients was significantly extended from 30 months (19-51) to 43 months (38-76) after administrating the PD-1 inhibitors before the debulking (HR = 0.501, 95% CI: 0.266 to 0.942). There were no significant differences in the median survival of patients between the two groups [44 months (38-79) vs. 44 months (32-81)] (HR = 0.814, 95% CI: 0.412 to 1.612). The two protocols had a similar safety profile. CONCLUSIONS Nivolumab administration preceding delayed CRN provides significant progression-free survival benefits for patients with mRCC, but its impact on overall survival requires further investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X-P Shen
- Department of Graduate, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
66
|
Steinhoff H, Acs M, Blaj S, Dank M, Herold M, Herold Z, Herzberg J, Sanchez-Velazquez P, Strate T, Szasz AM, Piso P. Prolonged hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy duration with 90 minutes cisplatin might increase overall survival in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastases. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:2850-2863. [PMID: 37274066 PMCID: PMC10237111 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i18.2850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced gastric cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastases (GC-PM) is associated with a poor prognosis. Although cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is a promising approach, only a limited number of Western studies exist.
AIM To investigate the clinicopathological outcomes of patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC for GC-PM.
METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients with GC-PM was conducted. All patients were seen at the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany between January 2011 and July 2021 and underwent CRS-HIPEC. Preoperative laboratory results, the use of neoadjuvant trastuzumab, and the details of CRS-HIPEC, including peritoneal carcinomatosis index, completeness of cytoreduction, and surgical procedures were recorded. Disease-specific (DSS), and overall survival (OS) of patients were calculated.
RESULTS A total of 73 patients were included in the study. Patients treated with neoadjuvant trastuzumab (n = 5) showed longer DSS (P = 0.0482). Higher white blood cell counts (DSS: P = 0.0433) and carcinoembryonic antigen levels (OS and DSS: P < 0.01), and lower hemoglobin (OS and DSS: P < 0.05) and serum total protein (OS: P = 0.0368) levels were associated with shorter survival. Longer HIPEC duration was associated with more advantageous median survival times [60-min (n = 59): 12.86 mo; 90-min (n = 14): 27.30 mo], but without statistical difference. To obtain additional data from this observation, further separation of the study population was performed. First, propensity score-matched patient pairs (n = 14 in each group) were created. Statistically different DSS was found between patient pairs (hazard ratio = 0.2843; 95% confidence interval: 0.1119-0.7222; P = 0.0082). Second, those patients who were treated with trastuzumab and/or had human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positivity (median survival: 12.68 mo vs 24.02 mo), or had to undergo the procedure before 2016 (median survival: 12.68 mo vs 27.30 mo; P = 0.0493) were removed from the original study population.
CONCLUSION Based on our experience, CRS-HIPEC is a safe and secure method to improve the survival of advanced GC-PM patients. Prolonged HIPEC duration may serve as a good therapy for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heinrich Steinhoff
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg 93049, Germany
| | - Miklos Acs
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg 93049, Germany
| | - Sebastian Blaj
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg 93049, Germany
| | - Magdolna Dank
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine and Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest 1083, Hungary
| | - Magdolna Herold
- Department of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest 1088, Hungary
| | - Zoltan Herold
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine and Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest 1083, Hungary
| | - Jonas Herzberg
- Department of Surgery, Krankenhaus Reinbek St. Adolf-Stift, Reinbek 21465, Germany
| | | | - Tim Strate
- Department of Surgery, Krankenhaus Reinbek St. Adolf-Stift, Reinbek 21465, Germany
| | - Attila Marcell Szasz
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine and Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest 1083, Hungary
| | - Pompiliu Piso
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg 93049, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Jorgensen K, Melamed A, Wu CF, Nitecki R, Pareja R, Fagotti A, Schorge JO, Ramirez PT, Rauh-Hain JA. Minimally invasive interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 172:130-137. [PMID: 36977622 PMCID: PMC10192032 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Assess outcomes of interval debulking surgery (IDS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy via minimally invasive surgery (MIS) compared with laparotomy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS Patients diagnosed with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer between 2013 and 2018 who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and IDS were identified in the National Cancer Database. Primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were 5-year survival, 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality, extent of surgery, residual disease, hospitalization duration, surgical conversions, and unplanned readmissions. Propensity score matching was used to compare MIS and laparotomy for IDS. Association of treatment approach with overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. Sensitivity analysis was conducted for effect of unmeasured confounders. RESULTS A total of 7897 patients met inclusion criteria; 2021 (25.6%) underwent MIS. Percentage undergoing MIS increased from 20.3%-29.0% over the study period. After propensity score matching, median overall survival was 46.7 months in the MIS group versus 41.0 months in the laparotomy group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.86 (95%CI 0.79-0.94)]. Five-year survival probability was higher in MIS versus laparotomy (38.3% vs 34.8%, p < 0.01). There was lower 30- and 90-day mortality (0.3% vs 0.7% [p = 0.04] and 1.4% vs 2.5% [p = 0.01], respectively), shorter length of stay (median 3 vs 5 days, p < 0.01), lower residual disease (23.9% vs 26.7%, p < 0.01), and lower additional cytoreductive procedures (59.3% vs 70.8%, p < 0.01) in MIS compared to laparotomy, with similar rates of unplanned readmission (2.7% vs 3.1%, p = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS Patients who undergo IDS by MIS have similar overall survival and decreased morbidity compared with laparotomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten Jorgensen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
| | - Alexander Melamed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Chi-Fang Wu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Roni Nitecki
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Rene Pareja
- Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Department of Woman's and Child Health and Public Health Sciences, Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - John O Schorge
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States
| | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Reddy S, Punjala SR, Allan P, Vaidya A, Borle DP, Geiele H, Udupa V, Smith A, Vokes L, Vrakas G, Mohamed F, Dayal S, Moran B, Friend PJ, Cecil T. First Report With Medium-term Follow-up of Intestinal Transplantation for Advanced and Recurrent Nonresectable Pseudomyxoma Peritonei. Ann Surg 2023; 277:835-840. [PMID: 36468404 PMCID: PMC10082061 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report our experience with the combination of radical surgical excision and intestinal transplantation in patients with recurrent pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) not amenable to further cytoreductive surgery (CRS). BACKGROUND CRS and heated intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy are effective treatments for many patients with PMP. In patients with extensive small bowel involvement or nonresectable recurrence, disease progression results in small bowel obstruction, nutritional failure, and fistulation, with resulting abdominal wall failure. METHODS Between 2013 and 2022, patients with PMP who had a nutritional failure and were not suitable for further CRS underwent radical debulking and intestinal transplantation at our centre. RESULTS Fifteen patients underwent radical exenteration of affected intra-abdominal organs and transplantation adapted according to the individual case. Eight patients had isolated small bowel transplantation and 7 patients underwent modified multivisceral transplantation. In addition, in 7 patients with significant abdominal wall tumor involvement, a full-thickness vascularized abdominal wall transplant was performed. Two of the 15 patients died within 90 days due to surgically related complications. Actuarial 1-year and 5-year patient survivals were 79% and 55%, respectively. The majority of the patients had significant improvement in quality of life after transplantation. Progression/recurrence of disease was detected in 91% of patients followed up for more than 6 months. CONCLUSION Intestinal/multivisceral transplantation enables a more radical approach to the management of PMP than can be achieved with conventional surgical methods and is suitable for patients for whom there is no conventional surgical option. This complex surgical intervention requires the combined skills of both peritoneal malignancy and transplant teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srikanth Reddy
- Oxford Transplant Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Sai Rithin Punjala
- Oxford Transplant Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Philip Allan
- Oxford Transplant Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Anil Vaidya
- Oxford Transplant Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Deeplaxmi P. Borle
- Oxford Transplant Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Henk Geiele
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Venkatesha Udupa
- Oxford Transplant Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Alison Smith
- Oxford Transplant Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Lisa Vokes
- Oxford Transplant Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Georgios Vrakas
- Oxford Transplant Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Faheez Mohamed
- Peritoneal Malignancy Institute, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Sanjeev Dayal
- Peritoneal Malignancy Institute, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Brendan Moran
- Peritoneal Malignancy Institute, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Peter J. Friend
- Oxford Transplant Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Tom Cecil
- Peritoneal Malignancy Institute, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Kusamura S, Bhatt A, Hubner M, Villeneuve L, Deraco M, Bakrin N, Van Der Speeten K, Glehen O. The 2022 PSOGI International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Methodology. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2508-2519. [PMID: 36595113 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12990-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A group of experts from the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) and the BIG-RENAPE group carried out a consensus among surgeons experienced in treating peritoneal malignancies from around the world to derive recommendations on indications of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), choice and details of HIPEC regimens, and areas for future research. This manuscript describes the methodology of achieving this consensus and the degree of participation of experts. METHODS The Delphi technique was used and the questionnaire comprised three categories: evidence-based recommendations using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system with the PICO (patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome) method, an opinion survey, and research recommendations. A consensus was achieved if any one option had >50% of votes, or positive or negative recommendations combined had > 70% of votes. RESULTS Of the 145 experts solicited, 71.1% in round I and 72.2% in round II took the survey. Participation was highest among surgeons treating both gastrointestinal and gynecological malignancies. Of 113 questions, after round I, a consensus was achieved for 72 (63.7%) questions, and after the second round, consensus was achieved for another 22 (19.4%) questions, making a total of 94 (83.1%) questions for which a consensus was achieved. CONCLUSION This consensus was carried out using a thorough review of literature and robust rating of evidence, and included key experts and opinion leaders from across the world. The results could guide clinicians on the use of HIPEC, both in their day-to-day clinical practice and in designing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shigeki Kusamura
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Aditi Bhatt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Martin Hubner
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Laurent Villeneuve
- Department of Clinical Research, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Lyon, France
| | - Marcelo Deraco
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Naoual Bakrin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Lyon, France
| | | | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Lyon, France.
- Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France.
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Chen Z, Ali M, Kai Z, Wang Y, Wang C. HIPEC with CRS versus cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for the gastric cancer metastasis to peritoneum. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:1011-1016. [PMID: 36401054 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-03004-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal metastases (PM) have a poor prognosis in gastric cancer (GC). Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) gives favorable outcomes, but the influence of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains contentious. We designed to distinguish results between CRS versus HIPEC-CRS in patients with peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane library accessed to collect data and language is restricted to English. RevMan 5.4 was used to perform statistical analysis. The outcomes for categorical variables are mentioned in the risk ratio. RESULTS Ten trials involving 1367 patients in which 707 were CRS-HIPEC, while 660 CRS. We got significant results in 3rd year survival (P < 0.05), while 1st and 5th years are not statistically significant P > 0.05. CONCLUSION To compare with CRS, CRS-HIPEC has improved survival rate in deprived of further morbidity or mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuming Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Anqing First People's Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Muhammad Ali
- Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225001, China
- Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225001, China
| | - Zhe Kai
- Department of General Surgery, Anqing First People's Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Yang Wang
- Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225001, China
- Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225001, China
| | - Chaohui Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Anqing First People's Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Skowyra A, Szubert S, Rajs T, Nowakowski B, Wicherek L. The impact of splenectomy and diaphragmatic surgery on perioperative morbidity and overall survival of ovarian cancer patients. Ginekol Pol 2023; 94:807-815. [PMID: 36929791 DOI: 10.5603/gp.a2023.0028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The prognosis of ovarian cancer (OC), among other factors, depends on residual disease after primary debulking surgery (PDS) and initial disease advancement. The main aim of our study was to evaluate the survival benefits of splenectomy and diaphragmatic surgery in OC patients, when the procedures result in resection to no macroscopic residual disease or minimal residual disease [tumor nodules below 2.5 mm according to Sugarbaker's completeness of cytoreduction score (CC) = 1]. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 25 OC patients after splenectomy procedures, 28 patients after diaphragmatic surgery and 17 patients who had undergone both splenectomy and diaphragmatic surgery. Patients' overall survival (OS) was compared with residual disease-matched controls (47 patients) who had upper abdomen involvement but no requirement for splenectomy and/or diaphragmatic surgery. RESULTS Overall survival of patients after splenectomy was not significantly different from OS of patients who did not required splenectomy (36.1 vs 31.6 months; p = 0.85). No differences in OS were observed between patients who did and did not require diaphragmatic surgery (31.3 vs 41.8; p = 0.33). Similarly, we found no differences in OS between patients who underwent both splenectomy and diaphragmatic surgery and those patients who did not require either procedure (20.1 vs 31.6 months; p = 0.45). Splenectomies and diaphragmatic surgeries were associated with prolonged hospitalization and length of surgery, however, no specific morbidity related to the procedures was observed. CONCLUSIONS In the cases of advanced OC, diaphragm and spleen involvement do not hamper patient prognosis when adequately resected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artur Skowyra
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Sebastian Szubert
- Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Department of Gynaecology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland, Poland.
| | - Tomasz Rajs
- Clinical Department of Colorectal, General and Oncological Surgery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Blazej Nowakowski
- Surgical, Oncology and Endoscopic Gynecology Department, The Greater Poland Center Cancer, Poznan, Poland
| | - Lukasz Wicherek
- School of Public Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Li KP, Chen SY, Wang CY, Li XR, Yang L. The impact of cytoreductive nephrectomy on survival outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving immunotherapy: An evidence-based analysis of comparative outcomes. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1132466. [PMID: 36999026 PMCID: PMC10043247 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1132466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PurposeThe prognostic impact of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the era of immunotherapy is yet to be determined. The aim of our study is to evaluate the correlation between CN and outcomes in the setting of mRCC treated with immunotherapy.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search of the Science, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant studies published in English up to December 2022. The results were presented as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) was extracted to assess their relevance. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022383026).ResultsA total of 2397 patients were included in eight studies. The CN group was observed to be correlated with superior OS compared to the No CN group (HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.39–0.71, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis according to the type of immunotherapy, sample size, and treatment line of immune checkpoint inhibitor revealed that CN group had a superior OS in all subgroups.ConclusionCN is associated with a better outcome in terms of OS benefit in selected patients with mRCC treated by immunotherapy, but further studies are required to verify the conclusions.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022383026.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Li Yang
- *Correspondence: Xiao-ran Li, ; Li Yang,
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Wang C, Yin XY, An LB, Zhai XC, Cai Y, Shi GJ, Fan XW, Zhang P, Wang KM, Ma RQ. Significance of laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for appendiceal pseudomyxoma peritonei with limited disease and low tumor burden. Asian J Surg 2023; 46:1220-1225. [PMID: 36064480 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.08.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical value of laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in treating of appendiceal pseudomyxoma peritonei with limited disease and low tumor burden. METHODS The clinical data of patients with appendiceal pseudomyxoma peritonei treated by surgery with CRS at the Aerospace Center Hospital from January 2018 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into laparoscopic or open CRS groups according to the operation method. A propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis (1:1) was performed, the related clinical variables were compared between the two groups, and the effect on progression-free survival (PFS) was also analyzed. RESULTS One hundred and eight patients were included in this study. After PSM, 33 patients were selected from each group and the age and peritoneal cancer index were matched between the two groups. There were significant differences in operation time (P < 0.001), intraoperative bleeding (P < 0.001), intraoperative blood transfusion (P = 0.007), hospital stay (P < 0.001). The analysis of PFS showed that there was no significant difference between the two operation methods. After multivariate analysis, the pathologic subtype (P = 0.012) was identified as an independent prognostic factor for PFS. CONCLUSION The curative effect of laparoscopic CRS is like that of open operation, which can significantly shorten the operation time and hospital stay and reduce intraoperative bleeding and blood transfusion event. The laparoscopic CRS is safe and feasible in strictly selected patients. The pathologic subtype is an independent factor affecting the prognosis for PFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chong Wang
- Department of Myxoma, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Xiang-Yang Yin
- Peking University Aerospace School of Clinical Medicine, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Lu-Biao An
- Department of Myxoma, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Xi-Chao Zhai
- Department of Myxoma, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Ying Cai
- Department of Myxoma, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Guan-Jun Shi
- Department of Myxoma, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Xi-Wen Fan
- Department of Myxoma, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Pu Zhang
- Department of Myxoma, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Kai-Min Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Gastrointestinal, Changchun Tumor Hospital, Jilin, 130000, China.
| | - Rui-Qing Ma
- Department of Myxoma, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, 100049, China.
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Nakanishi T, Saito T, Aoki D, Watanabe Y, Ushijima K, Takano M, Sugiyama T, Yaegashi N, Takehara K. JGOG2046: a feasibility study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by debulking surgery for clinically diagnosed FIGO stage IVb endometrial cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2023; 28:436-444. [PMID: 36729215 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-022-02284-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated the feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by debulking surgery, for clinically diagnosed FIGO stage IVb endometrial cancer (protocol number: JGOG2046). METHODS The experimental treatment consisted of 3 cycles of paclitaxel (180 mg/m2) plus carboplatin (AUC5) followed by debulking surgery, including total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and 3 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were considered as eligible if they were pathologically diagnosed as primary endometrial cancer, and had both endometrial tumor and distant metastasis confirmed by imaging examinations. The primary endpoint was the incidence of patients who completed debulking surgery after the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS While 51 patients were enrolled from 23 hospitals, the final study cohort consisted of 49 patients with a mean age of 59.0 years. Although the response ratio of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 65.3% (95% CI 50.4-78.3%), 67.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 52.5-80.1%) underwent debulking surgery after the neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 59.2% (95% CI 45.2-71.8%) completed the protocol treatment including 3 courses of adjuvant chemotherapy. The median disease-free survival time was 9.1 months (95% CI 6.5-11.9), while the median overall survival time was 23.2 months (95% CI 11.9-27.8). A patient with sigmoid colon cancer and another with cervical cancer were included in this study. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by debulking surgery was a feasible and acceptable treatment for metastatic endometrial cancer. (225 words).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Nakanishi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 1-15-1 Fukumuro, Miyagino-Ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 983-8536, Japan.
- Department of Gynecology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
| | - Toshiaki Saito
- Gynecology Service, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Daisuke Aoki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yo Watanabe
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 1-15-1 Fukumuro, Miyagino-Ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 983-8536, Japan
| | - Kimio Ushijima
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masashi Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Toru Sugiyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Iwate, Japan
| | - Nobuo Yaegashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Takehara
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Lee YJ, Chung YS, Lee JY, Nam EJ, Kim SW, Kim YT, Kim S. Role of diagnostic laparoscopy in deciding primary treatment in advanced-stage ovarian cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 2023; 34:e17. [PMID: 36562129 PMCID: PMC9995876 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We evaluated the usefulness of preoperative diagnostic laparoscopy for treatment planning in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 614 patients diagnosed with advanced-stage ovarian cancer between January 2010 and May 2018. Primary debulking surgery (PDS) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by interval debulking surgery were selected based on preoperative laparoscopic (Group 1, n=192) and computed tomography findings (Group 2, n=422). The primary outcomes in the PDS and NAC groups were suboptimal cytoreduction (residual disease >1 cm) rate and non-high-grade serous carcinoma (non-HGSC) rate, respectively. RESULTS The patients who underwent PDS in group 1 and group 2 were 49 (25.5%) and 279 (66.1%), respectively. The suboptimal cytoreduction rate after PDS was lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 (2.0% vs 11.1%, p=0.023). Moreover, Group 1 showed a tendency toward a lower proportion of non-HGSC patients who underwent NAC than that in Group 2 (9.1% vs. 15.4%, p=0.069). Further, Group 1 showed lower rates of postoperative morbidity than Group 2 (5.2% vs. 10.4%, p=0.033). However, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant differences in survival outcomes between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION Diagnostic laparoscopy reduced the suboptimal cytoreduction rate in the PDS group and the implementation rate of NAC in non-HGSC patients. Moreover, it reduced postoperative morbidity without affecting survival in both groups. Thus, diagnostic laparoscopy is a valuable diagnostic tool for determining the primary treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Jae Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Shin Chung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung-Yun Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Ji Nam
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Wun Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Tae Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sunghoon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Kim JH, Chun SY, Lee DE, Woo YH, Chang SJ, Park SY, Chang YJ, Lim MC. Cost-effectiveness of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy following interval cytoreductive surgery for stage III-IV ovarian cancer from a randomized controlled phase III trial in Korea (KOV-HIPEC-01). Gynecol Oncol 2023; 170:19-24. [PMID: 36608383 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) following interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) for stage III-IV ovarian cancer from a randomized controlled phase III trial. METHODS A comparative cost-effective analysis was performed using a Markov health-state transition model derived from the current trial cohort (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01091636). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was evaluated by dividing the incremental costs by incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) with a time horizon of 10 years. Costs were calculated from the perspective of Korean healthcare, and health utility values were extracted from published sources. RESULTS Based on data from the trial, the mean QALY in the ICS group was 7.16 compared to 10.8 in ICS followed by the HIPEC group. With an incremental QALY of 3.64, the ICS followed by HIPEC, was estimated to obtain an ICER of KRW 954,598 (USD 708.3) per QALY. CONCLUSION The findings of the study suggest that ICS followed by HIPEC, is cost-effective with a significant gain in QALYs. These results may support the current reimbursement of HIPEC from Korean insurance services and the management of long-term conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Hyun Kim
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Youn Chun
- Research and Analysis Department, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong-Eun Lee
- Biostatistics Collaboration Team, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Yo Han Woo
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Suk-Joon Chang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Yoon Park
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Jung Chang
- Department of Cancer Control & Population Health, National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Department of Family Medicine, Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
| | - Myong Cheol Lim
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Rare and Pediatric Cancer Branch and Immuno-oncology Branch, Division of Rare and Refractory Cancer, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Center for Clinical Trials, Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Klos D, Hanuliak J, Lemstrova R, Mohelnikova-Duchonova B, Zapletalova J, Melichar B, Risko J. Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. BRATISL MED J 2023; 124:345-350. [PMID: 36876363 DOI: 10.4149/bll_2023_052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of treatment of diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) at a single center. METHODS We conducted a retrospective single-center observational cohort study of consecutive patients with DMPM treated by CRS-HIPEC at the Department of Surgery I of the University Hospital in Olomouc, Czech Republic. RESULTS Data on a total of 16 patients were processed. The study group of 16 patients had six (37.5 %) women. The mean age was approximately 62 years. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in all patients (100 %) (CC0: 75 %, CC1: 25 %). All patients underwent a closed form of HIPEC with cisplatin and doxorubicin for 90 min. The mean hospital stay was 13.5 days, including 4.38 days in the ICU (13.5 ± 5.07 and 4.38 ± 1.49, respectively). Major postoperative complications (CD grades 3-4) occurred in four patients (25 %). In-hospital mortality was 6.25 %. In the study group, the median overall survival was 20 months, and the median disease-free survival was 10.3 months. CONCLUSIONS Also under the conditions at our specialized center, CRS-HIPEC is considered as an effective, affordable, and safe therapy with OS, DFS, morbidity, and mortality rates comparable to those reported in the literature (Tab. 5, Fig. 2, Ref. 28). Text in PDF www.elis.sk Keywords: cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, malignant mesothelioma, cisplatin, doxorubicin.
Collapse
|
78
|
Ronsini C, Pasanisi F, Greco P, Cobellis L, De Franciscis P, Cianci S. Mininvasive Cytoreduction Surgery plus HIPEC for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review. Medicina (B Aires) 2023; 59:medicina59030421. [PMID: 36984422 PMCID: PMC10055964 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59030421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives: The Gold-Standard treatment for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer remains cytoreductive surgery followed by systemic chemotherapy. Surgery can be performed either by an open or minimally invasive approach (MIS), although the former remains the most widely used approach. Recently, Van Driel et al. proved that adding 100 mg/m2 of Cisplatin in Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) at Interval Debulking Surgery (IDS) gives a disease-free survival (DFS) advantage. Similarly, Gueli-Alletti et al. demonstrated how the MIS approach is feasible and safe in IDS. Moreover, Petrillo et al. reported pharmacokinetic profiles with a higher chemotherapy concentration in patients undergoing HIPEC after MIS compared with the open approach. Therefore, the following review investigates the oncological and clinical safety consequences of the association between MIS and HIPEC. Methods: Following the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, we systematically searched the PubMed and Scopus databases in April 2022. Studies containing data about oncological and safety outcomes were included. We registered the Review to the PROSPERO site for meta-analysis with protocol number CRD42022329503. Results: Five studies fulfilled inclusion criteria. 42 patients were included in the review from three different Gynecological Oncological referral centers. The systematic review highlighted a Recurrence Rate ranging between 0 and 100%, with a 3-year Platinum-Free Survival between 10 and 70%. The most common HIPEC drug was Cisplatin, used at concentrations between 75 and 100 mg/m2 and at an average temperature of 42 °C, for 60 to 90 min. Only 1 Acute Kidney Insufficiency has been reported. Conclusions: The scarcity of clinical trials focusing on a direct comparison between MIS and the open approach followed by HIPEC in EOC treatment does not make it possible to identify an oncological advantage between these two techniques. However, the safety profiles shown are highly reassuring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Ronsini
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca Pasanisi
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Greco
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, A. Gemelli, IRCCS, University Hospital Foundation, 00198 Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Cobellis
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Pasquale De Franciscis
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Stefano Cianci
- Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Childhood “G. Barresi”, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Graham R, Kotsopoulos IC. A comparison of end-to-end and end-to-side anastomosis following rectosigmoid resection in ovarian cancer cytoreductive surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:468-474. [PMID: 36096854 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.08.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A rectosigmoid resection with anastomosis is a common component of cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer. Evidence from colorectal studies suggests that end-to-side anastomoses may be associated with fewer complications than end-to-end approaches, but these have not previously been compared in an ovarian cancer patient cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS Over a 51-month period, 239 patients underwent cytoreductive surgery for FIGO stage III/IV ovarian cancer. A rectosigmoid resection was performed in 79 (33.1%) with anastomosis in 59 (74.7%). Pre-operative and intra-operative factors associated with anastomotic leak, and post-operative complications were compared by anastomotic technique. RESULTS Anastomoses were end-to-end in 33 (55.9%) and end-to-side in 26 (44.1%) patients. There was a greater proportion of patients with a higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists score in the end-to-side group, but no other statistically significant differences in pre-or intra-operative factors between the groups. There were three (9.1%) cases of anastomotic leak in the end-to-end group, and no leaks in the end-to-side group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Both leaks were small, and successfully conservatively managed. There was no significant difference in rate of Clavien Dindo grade III/IV complications, although there was a higher rate of grade II complications following an end-to-side anastomosis (p = 0.036). There was no difference in length of stay, time to restarting chemotherapy, re-operation or 90-day mortality rate. CONCLUSION There was no significant difference in major morbidity following end-to-end or end-to-side anastomosis. Prospective randomised trials specifically focussed in ovarian cancer are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radha Graham
- University College Hospital, 250 Euston Road, London, NW1 2PG, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
80
|
Krause D, Richardson DL. Is there a role for secondary debulking in ovarian cancer? A review of the current literature. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2023; 35:1-5. [PMID: 36239548 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Until recently, no data was available from randomized, controlled trials (RCT) to assess the role of secondary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in the management of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. This review highlights results from the three completed RCTs, and other recent literature on this topic. RECENT FINDINGS Both the AGO and iMODEL criteria predict high rates of complete gross resection at the time of secondary CRS. Overall survival (OS) was improved in the surgical arms in both DESKTOP 3 and SOC-1. In contrast, surgery did not improve OS in GOG 213, but greater than 80% of patients received bevacizumab with chemotherapy in GOG 213. SUMMARY Secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer can be considered in patients who meet specific criteria. Available data supports improvement in OS for patients not receiving bevacizumab, who achieve complete gross resection. Surgery is harmful to patients with gross residual disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Krause
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
81
|
Bakouny Z, El Zarif T, Dudani S, Connor Wells J, Gan CL, Donskov F, Shapiro J, Davis ID, Parnis F, Ravi P, Steinharter JA, Agarwal N, Alva A, Wood L, Kapoor A, Ruiz Morales JM, Kollmannsberger C, Beuselinck B, Xie W, Heng DYC, Choueiri TK. Upfront Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors or Targeted Therapy: An Observational Study from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium. Eur Urol 2023; 83:145-151. [PMID: 36272943 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors is unclear. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the relationship between upfront CN and clinical outcomes in the setting of mRCC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Using the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium, we retrospectively identified patients diagnosed with de novo mRCC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Overall survival (OS) was compared between the two groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regressions adjusting for known prognostic factors. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS We identified a total of 4639 eligible patients with mRCC. Among the 4202 patients treated with targeted therapy and 437 patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, 2326 (55%) and 234 (54%) patients received upfront CN prior to treatment start. In multivariable analyses, CN was associated with significantly better OS in both the immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-0.90, p = 0.013) and the targeted therapy treatment (HR: 0.72; 95% CI, 0.67-0.78, p < 0.001) group. There was no difference in OS benefit of CN between the immune checkpoint inhibitor and targeted therapy treatment groups (interaction p = 0.6). Limitations include selection of patients from large academic centers and the retrospective nature of the study. CONCLUSIONS Upfront CN is associated with a significant OS benefit in selected patients treated by either immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapy, and still has a role in selected patients in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors. PATIENT SUMMARY Before effective systemic therapies were available for metastatic kidney cancer, surgical removal of the primary (kidney) tumor was the mainstay of treatment. The role of removing the primary tumor has recently been called into question given that more effective systemic therapies have become available. In this study, we find that removal of the primary kidney tumor still has a benefit for selected patients treated with highly effective modern systemic therapies, including targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziad Bakouny
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Talal El Zarif
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shaan Dudani
- Department of Oncology, William Osler Health System, Brampton, ON, Canada
| | - J Connor Wells
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Frede Donskov
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | | | - Ian D Davis
- Monash University Eastern Health Clinical School, Melbourne, Australia; Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Praful Ravi
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John A Steinharter
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Ajjai Alva
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Lori Wood
- Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Anil Kapoor
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Benoit Beuselinck
- University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wanling Xie
- Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Foster JM, Zhang C, Rehman S, Sharma P, Alexander HR. The contemporary management of peritoneal metastasis: A journey from the cold past of treatment futility to a warm present and a bright future. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73:49-71. [PMID: 35969103 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is often regarded as a less frequent pattern of spread; however, collectively across all spectra of primary tumors, the consequences of PM impact a large population of patients annually. Unlike other modes of metastasis, symptoms at presentation or during the treatment course are common, representing an additional challenge in the management of PM. Early efforts with chemotherapy and incomplete surgical interventions transiently improved symptoms, but durable symptom control and survival extension were rare, which established a perspective of treatment futility for PM through most of the 20th century. Notably, the continued development of better systemic therapy combinations, optimization of cytoreductive surgery (CRS), and rigorous investigation of combining regional therapy-specifically hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy-with CRS, have resulted in more effective multimodal treatment options for patients with PM. In this article, the authors provide a comprehensive review of the data establishing the contemporary approach for tumors with a high frequency of PM, including appendix, colorectal, mesothelioma, and gastric cancers. The authors also explore the emerging role of adding hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy to the well established paradigm of CRS and systemic therapy for advanced ovarian cancer, as well as the recent clinical trials identifying the efficacy of poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase maintenance therapy. Finally, recent data are included that explore the role of precision medicine technology in PM management that, in the future, may help further improve patient selection, identify the best systemic therapy regimens, detect actionable mutations, and identify new targets for drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M Foster
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Chunmeng Zhang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Shahyan Rehman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
83
|
Choi SY, Ha MS, Lee JW, Kim JH, Kim JH, Chi BH, Kim JW, Chang IH, Kim TH, Myung SC. Shifting role of cytoreductive nephrectomy according to type of systemic therapy: A nationwide cohort study. Asian J Surg 2023; 46:328-336. [PMID: 35450758 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The best protocol of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and systemic therapy (ST) in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains unclear. We sought to evaluate overall survival (OS) in patients with mRCC treated with ST with or without CN. METHODS We collected data from the National Health Insurance Service database. We excluded 2 years of washout period, 2 years of follow-up period, other cancer diagnoses within 2 years, and ≥4 months interval between ST and CN. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether CN was performed. Kaplan-Meier, propensity score matching, Cox regression model, and incremental survival analyses were conducted. Additionally, we performed subgroup analysis according to whether cytokine therapy or targeted therapy was used as first-line ST. RESULTS Of 6478 patients, 1707 (26.4%) underwent CN. The CN group showed significantly better OS than the no CN group (p < 0.001). In the cytokine therapy subgroup, patients who underwent CN had significantly higher OS than those who did not (p < 0.001). In the targeted therapy subgroup, no significant difference was found (p = 0.867). In multivariate analysis, CN was associated with better OS in the total cohort (hazard ratio 0.819, p < 0.001). The incremental OS benefit of CN ranged from +0.98 in patients who survived for <24 months to +2.13 in those who survived during all periods. CONCLUSION About a quarter patients with mRCC from a nationwide database were treated with CN and ST. CN was beneficial in specific patients with mRCC. Patient selection is crucial for obtaining the benefits of CN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Se Young Choi
- Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Biomedical Research Institute, Chung-Ang University Hospital, South Korea.
| | - Moon Soo Ha
- Department of Urology, Hyundae General Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
| | - Jeong Woo Lee
- Data Science Team, Hanmi Pharm. Co.,Ltd, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Jae Hwan Kim
- Data Science Team, Hanmi Pharm. Co.,Ltd, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Jung Hoon Kim
- Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
| | - Byung Hoon Chi
- Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Jin Wook Kim
- Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
| | - In Ho Chang
- Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Tae-Hyoung Kim
- Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Soon Chul Myung
- Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Kuusela K, Norppa N, Auranen A, Saarelainen S. Maximal surgical effort increases the risk of postoperative complications in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2022; 48:2525-2530. [PMID: 35717320 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgery is the cornerstone of the treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. Reaching complete cytoreduction resulting in no gross residual disease often requires complex surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of increased surgical radicality on the risk of complications in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS All consecutive patients with advanced ovarian cancer (FIGO Stage IIIB-IVB) who had undergone primary or interval debulking surgery during a six-year study period were identified. In the midst of the study period, a surgical practice change towards maximal surgical effort occurred. Two groups were formed for the analysis: cohort A, that consisted of patients operated before the surgical paradigm shift and cohort B, that consisted of patients operated under the period of increased surgical radicality. RESULTS 252 patients were included in the analysis. Complete resection (R0) was achieved in 21.3% of surgeries in cohort A and in 51.2% in cohort B. The total postoperative complication rate was 76.2%. Most of the complications (86.5%) were minor (Clavien-Dindo I-IIIA). The patients in cohort B were at increased risk for complications, OR 2.94 (95%CI 1.58-5.47; p = 0.001). As for the approach to cytoreduction (primary vs. interval debulking), there was no statistically significant association with the occurrence of postoperative complications (p = 0.659). CONCLUSION In the present study more extensive surgeries led to better surgical results but increased postoperative morbidity. Postoperative complication rates were similar in both primary and interval debulking surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Niina Norppa
- Tampere University Hospital, Department of Obsteterics and Gynecology, PO BOX 2000, FI-33521, Tampere, Finland
| | - Annika Auranen
- Tampere University Hospital, Department of Obsteterics and Gynecology, PO BOX 2000, FI-33521, Tampere, Finland; Tays Cancer Centre, PO BOX 2000, FI-33521, Tampere, Finland
| | - Sami Saarelainen
- Tampere University Hospital, Department of Obsteterics and Gynecology, PO BOX 2000, FI-33521, Tampere, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Schmalfeldt B. [Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer]. Chirurgie (Heidelb) 2022; 93:1144-1151. [PMID: 36201013 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-022-01728-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The achievement of macroscopically complete tumor resection in primary debulking surgery is the most important prognostic factor in advanced ovarian cancer. This results in a median survival benefit of >5 years. Systematic lymphadenectomy (LNE) is not indicated in advanced ovarian cancer with inconspicuous lymph nodes as it does not prolong overall survival and therefore should no longer be carried out above stage IIB with inconspicuous lymph nodes in imaging and by palpation. Primary cytoreductive surgery is the standard in advanced ovarian cancer. Neoadjuvant therapy is currently an option only if primary cytoreduction does not appear to be possible. For the use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in primary debulking surgery a survival benefit has so far not been proven and therefore HIPEC is not recommended in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Schmalfeldt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Dobrindt EM, Gül-Klein S, Alberto Vilchez ME, Gronau F, Thuss-Patience P, Rau B. [Peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastric cancer : Treatment options for peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastric cancer]. Chirurgie (Heidelb) 2022; 93:1133-1138. [PMID: 35980425 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-022-01699-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer is one of the most aggressive malignant diseases of the gastrointestinal tract with a high rate of metastasis. Peritoneal metastasis occurs in up to 60% of all patients and synchronously in up to 30% in locally advanced gastric cancer. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been an established treatment option in selected patients for several years, as the HIPEC serves as an alternative administration route. OBJECTIVE This article presents a schematic display of the various treatment options depending on the extent of peritoneal carcinomatosis in a gastric cancer. METHODS A literature search and analysis of the current literature on the treatment of gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases were carried out. A differentiation was made between limited and extensive peritoneal carcinomatosis together with the appropriate treatment strategy. RESULTS Principally, individual systemic chemotherapy is the backbone of treatment of gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases. In selected patients and in cases of limited peritoneal carcinomatosis, CRS and HIPEC can be conducted and survival is improved; however, CRS is still contraindicated in cases of extensive peritoneal carcinomatosis and in exceptional cases pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) can be carried out. CONCLUSION In selected patients CRS and HIPEC can lead to an improvement with respect to overall and disease-free survival. In cases of extensive peritoneal carcinomatosis, individualized chemotherapy remains the major treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva M Dobrindt
- Chirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Safak Gül-Klein
- Chirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Miguel Enrique Alberto Vilchez
- Chirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Felix Gronau
- Chirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Peter Thuss-Patience
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Beate Rau
- Chirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Yang W, Ma L, Dong J, Wei M, Ji R, Chen H, Xue X, Li Y, Jin Z, Xu W, Ji Z. Machine learning to improve prognosis prediction of metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy and systemic therapy. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2022; 23:471-482. [PMID: 36326180 PMCID: PMC10171449 DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2022.8047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) combined with systemic therapy is commonly used to treat metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC). However, prognostic models for these patients are limited. In the present study, the clinical data of 782 mccRCC patients who received both CN and systemic therapy were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2016), and patients were divided into training and internal test cohorts. A total of 144 patients who met the same criteria from our center (Peking Union Medical College Hospital) were placed in the external test cohort. The cancer-specific survival rate (CSS) at 1, 3, and 5 years was set as the research outcome. Then, four ML models, i.e., a gradient boosting machine (GBM), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and logistic regression (LR), were established. Fifteen potential independent features were included in this study. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Seven clinical features, namely pathological grade, T stage, N stage, number of metastatic sites, brain or liver metastases, and metastasectomy were selected for subsequent analysis via the recursive feature elimination (RFE) algorithm. In conclusion, the GBM model performed best at 1-, 3- and 5-year CSS prediction (0.836, 0.819 and 0.808, respectively in the internal test cohort and 0.819, 0.805 and 0.786, respectively in the external cohort). Furthermore, we divided the patients into three strata (high-, intermediate- and low-risk) via X-tile analysis and concluded that clinically individualized treatment can be aided by these practical prognostic models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjie Yang
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Ma
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Dong
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Mengchao Wei
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Ruoyu Ji
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Hualin Chen
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoqiang Xue
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Yingjie Li
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Zhaoheng Jin
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Weifeng Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Zhigang Ji
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Young S, Ostowari A, Yu J, Eng OS, Dayyani F, Senthil M. The role of cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2022; 20:673-682. [PMID: 36331405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) progresses rapidly and has historically dismal survival rates. Given the aggressive tumor biology and poor survival outcomes of patients with GC/PC, additional treatments beyond systemic chemotherapy are needed. Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy have been effective management options for peritoneal surface malignancies, with increasing data to support their use in GC/PC. This review highlights the evolution of the surgical treatment of GC/PC, and discusses critical studies supporting the role of cytoreductive surgery, appropriate patient selection, and various methods in the delivery of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with GC/PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Young
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Saint John's Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, California
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California-Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Arsha Ostowari
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California-Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Jingjing Yu
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California-Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Oliver S Eng
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California-Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Farshid Dayyani
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California-Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Maheswari Senthil
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California-Irvine, Orange, California
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Zhang F, Huang S, Li D, Huang H, O'Donnell JM. Anesthesia Management for Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Surgery on Short-Term Patient Outcomes. AANA J 2022; 90:347-358. [PMID: 36173792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this retrospective study was to understand the impact of anesthesia management for the patients under cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy surgery (CRS+HIPEC). The perioperative electronic medical records of 833 CRS+HIPEC surgical cases from two hospitals were analyzed to study the characteristics of shortterm patient outcomes in hospitals for CRS+HIPEC. Older age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, male gender, longer anesthesia time, higher Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI), and higher intraoperative blood loss predict the prolonged hospital stay for patients. Older age, higher ASA score, longer anesthesia time, higher PCI, higher intraoperative fluid administration, lower intraoperative propofol dosage, higher intraoperative blood loss, and failed extubation predict the prolonged intensive care unit stay. Older age, male gender, longer anesthesia time, higher ASA score, higher PCI, higher intraoperative opioid dosage, and higher intraoperative blood loss predict the higher degree postoperative complications. We also observed that implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols may improve patient outcomes for CRS+HIPEC. These results need further confirmation from future prospective randomized studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Zhang
- is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Nurse Anesthesia, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Shi Huang
- is a Biostatistician III in the Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Dan Li
- is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Health and Community Systems, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Heng Huang
- is a John A. Jurenko Endowed Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Pittsburgh School of Engineering, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - John M O'Donnell
- is a Professor in the Department of Nurse Anesthesia, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Nougaret S, Sadowski E, Lakhman Y, Rousset P, Lahaye M, Worley M, Sgarbura O, Shinagare AB. The BUMPy road of peritoneal metastases in ovarian cancer. Diagn Interv Imaging 2022; 103:448-459. [PMID: 36155744 DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2022.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most common cause of death due to gynecologic malignancies, with more than 70% of patients presenting with advanced stage disease at the time of diagnosis. The extent and distribution of tumor guide primary treatment selection and clinical management. While primary cytoreductive surgery with complete tumor resection improves survival, patients with extensive peritoneal disease may benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy first to reduce tumor burden followed by interval cytoreductive surgery. Imaging plays an essential role in triaging patients including selecting patients who may benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy before cytoreductive surgery. Interestingly, there are no universally established criteria to predict resectability and local practices depend on local guidelines and surgeon preferences. Nevertheless, certain anatomical tumor locations are known to be difficult to resect and are associated with suboptimal cytoreduction or require special surgical considerations. This review discusses the recent advances in the initial management of patients with ovarian cancer, a practical approach to the assessment and communication of peritoneal metastases locations on CT and MRI. It also explores recent advances in genomics profiling and radiomics that may influence the initial management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Nougaret
- Department of Radiology, IRCM, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute, 34090 Montpellier, France; INSERM, U1194, University of Montpellier, 34295 Montpellier, France.
| | - Elizabeth Sadowski
- Departments of Radiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin, WI 53726, United States
| | - Yulia Lakhman
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Pascal Rousset
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Benite 69495, France
| | - Max Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Worley
- Department of Surgery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - Olivia Sgarbura
- IRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, F-34298, France; Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute Montpellier (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Atul B Shinagare
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, United States; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Frassini S, Calabretto F, Granieri S, Fugazzola P, Viganò J, Fazzini N, Ansaloni L, Cobianchi L. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2022; 48:1911-1921. [PMID: 35688711 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer represents one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (NIPEC), and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) has been proven with curative intent mainly for other tumors and there is a lack of consensus regarding possible benefits also in pancreatic cancer. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aim to provide an up-to-date overview of the effectiveness and safety of intraperitoneal treatments in the management of pancreatic cancer. METHODS A systematic review of articles was conducted according to PRISMA and AMSTAR-2 guidelines. 11 studies were included in the analysis. RESULTS We included in our analysis 212 patients subdivided in three groups: 64 in the HIPEC group (57 with prophylactic intent and 7 with curative intent), 55 in the PIPAC group and 93 in the NIPEC group. Primary outcomes were represented by survival rates; we evidenced at an observation time of three years a survival of 24% in the HIPEC group (25.5% in the prophylactic arm and 6.2% in the curative arm), 5.3% in the PIPAC group and 7.9% in the NIPEC group. CONCLUSIONS HIPEC could be considered as a promising technique for prophylaxis and treatment of peritoneal metastasis (PM) in case of borderline resectable and locally advanced disease. Increased survival rates emerged without additional morbidity when surgical resection and CRS are possible. In addition, our data about PIPAC and NIPEC as palliative treatment in unresectable disease seems to identify more favorable survival rates compared to literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Frassini
- University of Pavia, Corso Str. Nuova, 65, 27100, Pavia, Italy; Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Francesca Calabretto
- University of Pavia, Corso Str. Nuova, 65, 27100, Pavia, Italy; Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Stefano Granieri
- General Surgery Unit, ASST Vimercate, Via Santi Cosma e Damiano, 10, 20871, Vimercate, Italy.
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Jacopo Viganò
- Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Nicola Fazzini
- University of Pavia, Corso Str. Nuova, 65, 27100, Pavia, Italy; Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- University of Pavia, Corso Str. Nuova, 65, 27100, Pavia, Italy; Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Lorenzo Cobianchi
- University of Pavia, Corso Str. Nuova, 65, 27100, Pavia, Italy; Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Shur JD. Image Guidance Improves Cytoreductive Surgery in Colorectal Cancer. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2022; 4:e229021. [PMID: 36178352 PMCID: PMC9530768 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.229021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
|
93
|
Pacelli F, Gerardi C, Rulli E, Abatini C, Rotolo S, Garattini S, Melotti G, Torri V, Galli F, Rulli E, Di Giorgio A. Prophylactic surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC CO2) versus standard surgery in colorectal carcinoma at high risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis: short-term and long-term outcomes from the CHECK study - protocol for a randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e051324. [PMID: 35914916 PMCID: PMC9345052 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Up to one-fifth of patients with colorectal cancer will develop peritoneal metastases, frequently without other districts' involvement. Despite the recent unsuccesses of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases treatment, the rationale in the prophylactic setting remains strong. Several clinical and pharmacokinetic data suggest that the efficacy of intraperitoneal chemotherapy is highest when the disease is microscopic. However, robust evidence demonstrating whether the addition of HIPEC for high-risk colorectal cancers offers better control of local recurrence is lacking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a multicentre randomised phase 3 trial comparing prophylactic surgery plus HIPEC CO2 with mitomycin, over standard surgical excision in patients with colorectal cancer at high risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis; 388 patients will be included in this study. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of prophylactic surgery (radical colorectal resection, omentectomy, appendectomy, round ligament of the liver resection and bilateral adnexectomy) plus HIPEC CO2 with mitomycin and standard surgery in terms of local recurrence-free survival. The main secondary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. The primary endpoint will be described with a cumulative incidence function and will be analysed with Grey test to take account of the competing risks. DFS and OS will be described with the Kaplan-Meier method. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This trial has been evaluated by the Italian Medicines Agency, local ethics committees and will be submitted to the Ministry of Health to notify the start of the trial according to the regulation of trials on devices with CE mark/certification.The results will be submitted for presentation at academic meetings and for publication in a peer-reviewed journal, whatever the findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03914820.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Pacelli
- Chirurgia del Peritoneo e del Retroperitoneo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Chiara Gerardi
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Eliana Rulli
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Carlo Abatini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Stefano Rotolo
- Chirurgia del Peritoneo e del Retroperitoneo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
- Dipartimento di Discipline Chirurgiche, Oncologiche e Stomatologiche (Di.Chir.On.S.), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Silvio Garattini
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Valter Torri
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Fabio Galli
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Erica Rulli
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Andrea Di Giorgio
- Chirurgia del Peritoneo e del Retroperitoneo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Panunzio A, Sorce G, Tappero S, Hohenhorst L, Cano Garcia C, Piccinelli M, Tian Z, Tafuri A, De Cobelli O, Chun FKH, Tilki D, Terrone C, Briganti A, Kapoor A, Saad F, Shariat SF, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A, Karakiewicz PI. Mortality according to treatment in metastatic collecting duct renal cell carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 21:295-300. [PMID: 36117092 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Controlled contemporary analyses of mortality in metastatic collecting duct renal cell carcinoma (mcdRCC) are unavailable. We addressed this knowledge gap and tested rates of treatment and associated mortality in patients with mcdRCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Within Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2018), we identified 155 mcdRCC patients. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazards regression models tested the effect of treatment (cytoreductive nephrectomy [CN] alone vs. systemic therapy [ST] alone vs. combination of both CN + ST) on overall mortality (OM). RESULTS In the overall cohort (n = 155), 57 patients (37%) were treated with combination of both CN + ST, 46 (30%) underwent CN alone, 28 (18%) received ST alone, and 24 (15%) had none/unknown treatment. According to age categories (≤ 59 vs. 60-69 vs. ≥ 70 years), rates of combination of both CN + ST were 45% vs. 45% vs. 14%, respectively. CN alone was the most frequent type of treatment in patients aged ≥ 70 (50%). Median overall survival was 4.0 months for CN alone vs. 5.5 months for ST alone vs. 9.0 months for combination of both CN+ST. In multivariable Cox regression models, where CN alone was the referent, the use of ST alone and combination of both CN + ST were respectively associated with a HR of 0.74 (P = .3) and 0.43 (P < .001), after adjustment for all covariates. CONCLUSIONS In mcdRCC patients, concomitant use of CN and ST results in lowest mortality, followed by ST alone, and CN alone. In consequence combination of both CN + ST should be recommended whenever applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Panunzio
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Gabriele Sorce
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Tappero
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Lukas Hohenhorst
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Cristina Cano Garcia
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Mattia Piccinelli
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Carlo Terrone
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Anil Kapoor
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Chen WW, Wang H, Li Y, Yuan ZX, Liu D, Wu ZJ, Deng WH, Luo R, Chen J, Cai J. [Analysis of perioperative efficacy and safety of cytoreductive surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 2022; 25:513-521. [PMID: 35754216 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20211027-00439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To analyzed perioperative safety of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis (CRPM) and to construct a predictive model for serious advese events (SAE). Methods: A descriptive case-series study was conducted to retrospectively collect the clinicopathological data and treatment status (operation time, number of organ resection, number of peritoneal resection, and blood loss, etc.) of 100 patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer or appendix mucinous adenocarcinoma who underwent CRS at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2019 to August 2021. There were 53 males and 47 females. The median age was 52.0 (39.0-61.8) years old. Fifty-two patients had synchronous peritoneal metastasis and 48 had metachronous peritoneal metastasis. Fifty-two patients received preoperative neoadjuvant therapy. Primary tumor was located in the left colon, the right colon and the rectum in 43, 28 and 14 cases, respectively. Fifteen patients had appendix mucinous adenocarcinoma. Measures of skewed distribution are expressed as M (range). Perioperative safety was analyzed, perioperative grade III or higher was defined as SAE. Risk factors associated with the occurrence of SAEs were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. A nomogram was plotted by R software to predict SAE, the efficacy of which was evaluated using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and correction curves. Results: The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score was 16 (1-39). Sixty-eight (68.0%) patients achieved complete tumor reduction (tumor reduction score: 0-1). Sixty-two patients were treated with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy (HIPEC). Twenty-one (21.0%) patients developed 37 SAEs of grade III-IV, including 2 cases of ureteral injury, 6 cases of perioperative massive hemorrhage or anemia, 7 cases of digestive system, 15 cases of respiratory system, 4 cases of cardiovascular system, 1 case of skin incision dehiscence, and 2 cases of abdominal infection. No grade V SAE was found. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that CEA (OR: 8.980, 95%CI: 1.428-56.457, P=0.019), PCI score (OR: 7.924, 95%CI: 1.486-42.259, P=0.015), intraoperative albumin infusion (OR: 48.959, 95%CI: 2.115-1133.289, P=0.015) and total volume of infusion (OR: 24.729, 95%CI: 3.956-154.562, P=0.001) were independent risk factors for perioperative SAE in CRS (all P<0.05). Based on the result of multivariate regression models, a predictive nomogram was constructed. Internal verification showed that the AUC of the nomogram was 0.926 (95%CI: 0.872-0.980), indicating good prediction accuracy and consistency. Conclusions: CRS is a safe and effective method to treat CRPM. Strict screening of patients and perioperative fluid management are important guarantees for reducing the morbidity of SAE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W W Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
| | - H Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
| | - Y Li
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
| | - Z X Yuan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
| | - D Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
| | - Z J Wu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
| | - W H Deng
- Department of pathology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
| | - R Luo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
| | - J Chen
- Department of Surgery, Dongguan Houjie hospital, Dongguan 523106, China
| | - J Cai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Boussedra S, Benoit L, Koual M, Bentivegna E, Nguyen-Xuan HT, Bats AS, Azaïs H. Fluorescence guided surgery to improve peritoneal cytoreduction in epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review of available data. Eur J Surg Oncol 2022; 48:1217-1223. [PMID: 35227555 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
During surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), the most important prognostic factor is the absence of residual tumor. Invisible microscopic peritoneal metastasis (mPM) are not removed during surgery and can be responsible of peritoneal recurrences. The aim of this current systematic review is to assess the role of fluorescence in evaluating mPM in EOC. We performed a systematic review using bibliographic citations from PubMed, Clinical Trials.gov, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. MeSH terms for fluorescence, EOC and peritoneal carcinomatosis were combined and not restricted to the English language. The final search was performed on September 1rst, 2021. The primary outcome was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of fluorescence. We also reviewed the different techniques used. Eighty-seven studies were identified. Of these, 10 were included for analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of fluorescence ranged between 66.7-100% and 54.2-100%, respectively. Most importantly, the negative predictive value (NPV) ranged from 90 to 100% Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, no consensus was reached concerning the optimal use of fluorescence in terms of type of dye, type and timing of injection and imager to use. No adverse event was reported. Fluorescence can safely be used in EOC to evaluate mPM with a high NPV. However, a randomized controlled trial is needed to homogenize current practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Safia Boussedra
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, Obstetric and Gynecologic Unit, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Gynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP. Centre, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Louise Benoit
- Gynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP. Centre, Université de Paris, Paris, France; INSERM UMR-S 1124, Université de Paris, Centre Universitaire des Saint-Père, Paris, France.
| | - Meriem Koual
- Gynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP. Centre, Université de Paris, Paris, France; INSERM UMR-S 1124, Université de Paris, Centre Universitaire des Saint-Père, Paris, France
| | - Enrica Bentivegna
- Gynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP. Centre, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Huyen-Thu Nguyen-Xuan
- Gynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP. Centre, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Bats
- Gynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP. Centre, Université de Paris, Paris, France; INSERM UMR-S 1147, Université de Paris, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France
| | - Henri Azaïs
- Gynecologic and Breast Oncologic Surgery Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP. Centre, Université de Paris, Paris, France; INSERM UMR-S 1147, Université de Paris, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
González-Abós C, Selva AB, de Lacy FB, Valverde S, Almenara R, Lacy AM. Quantitative Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging Assessment for Nonmucinous Peritoneal Metastases: Preliminary Results of the ICCP Study. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:314-321. [PMID: 34775406 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In selected patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin, complete cytoreduction has been the main single prognostic factor influencing long-term outcomes. In these patients, indocyanine green fluorescence imaging seems to be useful in detecting small subclinical peritoneal implants. However, quantitative fluorescence analysis has not yet been established as standard. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of quantitative indocyanine green fluorescence assessment in the detection of peritoneal metastases of nonmucinous colorectal origin. DESIGN This is a single-center, single-arm, low-intervention prospective trial. SETTINGS A fluorescence assessment device was used for intraoperative fluorescence quantitative assessment. PATIENTS Consecutive patients diagnosed with peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin who met the inclusion criteria were selected for curative surgery. INTERVENTIONS Intravenous indocyanine green was administered 12 hours before surgery. Cytoreduction was performed through nodule identification under white light and then under indocyanine green. Finally, ex vivo fluorescence was assessed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcomes measured were the sensitivity and specificity of quantitative fluorescence. RESULTS The first 11 enrolled patients were included in this preliminary analysis. In total, 52 nodules were resected, with 37 (71.1%) being diagnosed as malignant in the histopathological analysis. Of those, 5 (13.5%) were undetectable under white light and were identified only with fluorescence. A total of 15 nonmalignant nodules were detected under white light, 8 (53.3%) of which were fluorescence negative. Fluorescence greater than 181 units might be the threshold of malignancy, with a sensitivity and specificity of 89.0% and 85.0%, whereas uptake less than 100 units appears to correlate with a benign pathology. LIMITATIONS The limited sample size, the physiological uptake, and excretion of indocyanine green might interfere with the assessment of unnoticed implants in the bowel serosa and liver. CONCLUSIONS Quantitative indocyanine green seems to be useful for the assessment of nonmucinous colorectal peritoneal metastases. Fluorescence uptake greater than 181 units appears to correlate with malignancy, whereas uptake less than 100 units appears to correlate with a benign pathology. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B743. EVALUACIN CUANTITATIVA DE IMGENES DE FLUORESCENCIA CON VERDE DE INDOCIANINA PARA METSTASIS PERITONEALES NO MUCINOSAS RESULTADOS PRELIMINARES DEL ESTUDIO ICCP ANTECEDENTES:En pacientes seleccionados con metástasis peritoneales de origen colorrectal, la citorreducción com-pleta ha sido el único factor pronóstico principal que influye en el resultado a largo plazo. En estos pacientes, las imágenes de fluorescencia con verde de indocianina parecen ser útiles para detectar pequeños implantes peritoneales subclínicos. Sin embargo, el análisis cuantitativo de fluorescencia aún no se ha establecido como estándar.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la sensibilidad y especificidad de la evaluación cuantitativa de fluorescencia verde de indo-cianina, en la detección de metástasis peritoneales de origen colorrectal no mucinoso.DISEÑO:Ensayo prospectivo de intervención baja de un solo brazo y un solo centro.ENTORNO CLINICO:El dispositivo se utilizó para la evaluación cuantitativa de fluorescencia intraoperatoria.PACIENTES:Pacientes consecutivos diagnosticados con metástasis peritoneales de origen colorrectal, selecciona-dos para cirugía curativa y que cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión.INTERVENCIONES:Se administró verde de indocianina por vía intravenosa 12 h antes de la cirugía. La citorreducción se realizó mediante identificación de nódulos con luz blanca y luego con verde de indocianina. Final-mente, se evaluó la fluorescencia ex vivo.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Sensibilidad y especificidad cuantitativa de la fluorescencia.RESULTADOS:Los primeros 11 pacientes fueron incluidos en este análisis preliminar. En total se resecaron 52 nódu-los, siendo 37 (71,1%) diagnosticados como malignos en el análisis histopatológico. De ellos, 5 (13,5%) eran indetectables bajo luz blanca y solamente se identificaron con fluorescencia. Se detec-taron un total de 15 nódulos no malignos bajo luz blanca, de los cuales 8 (53,3%) fueron fluorescen-tes negativos. La fluorescencia superior a 181 unidades podría ser el umbral de malignidad, con una sensibilidad y especificidad del 89,0% y el 85,0% respectivamente; mientras que la captación por debajo de 100 unidades parece correlacionarse con una patología benigna.LIMITACIONES:El tamaño limitado de la muestra; la captación fisiológica y la excreción de verde de indocianina pueden interferir con la evaluación de implantes inadvertidos en la serosa intestinal y el hígado.CONCLUSIONES:La cuantificación del verde de indocianina, parece ser útil en la evaluación de metástasis peritonea-les colorrectales no mucinosas. La captación de fluorescencia por encima de 181 unidades parece correlacionarse con la malignidad, mientras que la captación por debajo de 100 unidades parece co-rrelacionarse con una patología benigna. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B743. (Traducción - Dr. Fidel Ruiz Healy).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina González-Abós
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Advances in Surgery (AIS) Channel, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Centro Esther Koplowitz, and Cellex Biomedical Research Centre, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
98
|
Taher R, Stanford S, Carr N, Vanderpuye N, Chandrakumaran K. Fear of cancer recurrence in peritoneal malignancy patients following complete cytoreductive surgery (CCRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): an observational study protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e057294. [PMID: 35165114 PMCID: PMC8845210 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is correlated with higher depression levels, worse quality of life and increased utilisation of healthcare services. There is no research on FCR in peritoneal malignancy (PM) patients-a rare type of abdominal cancer. This study aims to explore the prevalence, trajectory, demographic and clinical characteristics that are associated with FCR and its relationship with quality of life in PM patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a cross-sectional study. Validated measures will be used to collect data on the levels of FCR (Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory-Short Form) and quality of life (36-Item Short-Form Health Survey) of PM patients who have had surgery in the last 5 years at the Peritoneal Malignancy Institute in Basingstoke Hospital (minimum N=260). Descriptive statistics, Pearson χ2 tests and correlational tests will be used to analyse the data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was obtained from the HRA and Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW). The results of this study will be shared with the participants of this study, presented at conferences and PM patients' days in the form of presentations or posters, and published in a scientific journal. DISCUSSION The results of this exploratory study will be used to inform a multicentre observational study to explore the effect of FCR on PM patients' mental health (depression and anxiety), quality of life and healthcare utilisation which will inform a multicentre randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of using evidenced-based interventions to lower FCR in PM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rayan Taher
- Peritoneal Malignancy Institute, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK
| | - Sophia Stanford
- Peritoneal Malignancy Institute, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK
| | - Norman Carr
- Peritoneal Malignancy Institute, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK
| | - Nancy Vanderpuye
- Peritoneal Malignancy Institute, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK
| | - Kandiah Chandrakumaran
- Peritoneal Malignancy Institute, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Ghirardi V, De Felice F, D'Indinosante M, Bernardini F, Giudice MT, Fagotti A, Scambia G. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after primary debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: Is BRCA mutational status making the difference? Cancer Treat Res Commun 2022; 31:100518. [PMID: 35065323 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The role of a molecular pattern predictive of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) efficacy in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) patients has been poorly investigated. We aimed to assess the effect of HIPEC after primary debulking surgery (PDS) in AOC according to patient's Breast Cancer Gene (BRCA) mutational status. METHODS This is a retrospective, single center, case-control study. Data on AOC patients receiving HIPEC at the end of PDS as previously enrolled in a phase II monocentric trial (HIPEC group), were retrieved and matched for clinical and surgical characteristics with a group of cases who underwent PDS without receiving HIPEC between 01/2010 and 01/2015 (No HIPEC group). Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage ≥IIIB disease, aged between 18 and 70 years, with a laparoscopic Predictive Index value (PIV) ≤8 and residual disease ≤2.5 mm were included. RESULTS 70 patients were included. With the except of age (p = 0.012), the populations were balanced for the main characteristics. At a median follow-up of 48 months, no differences in Progression Free Survival (PFS) (p = 0.968) and Overall Survival (OS) (p = 0.789) were recorded. Survival analysis according to HIPEC administration and BRCA mutational status showed an improved PFS (p = 0.011) and OS (p = 0.003) in BRCA mutated compared to wild-type patients when HIPEC was not administered, whilst they were superimposable in case of HIPEC administration (p = 0.857 vs p = 0.372; respectively). No differences in terms of neither intra-operative (p = 1.0) nor early post-operative complications (p = 0.920) were detected. CONCLUSIONS Our results show that HIPEC in AOC may be a promising treatment in BRCA wild-type patients, as it seems to balance their decreased chemosensitivity compared to mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Ghirardi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco D'Indinosante
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Bernardini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Giudice
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy; Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy; Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
100
|
Mazurek M, Szlendak M, Forma A, Baj J, Maciejewski R, Roviello G, Marano L, Roviello F, Polom K, Sitarz R. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Management of Gastric Cancer: A Narrative Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:ijerph19020681. [PMID: 35055500 PMCID: PMC8776178 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19020681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) patients with peritoneal metastasis tend to achieve poor clinical outcomes. Until recently, the treatment options were limited mainly to either palliative chemotherapy or radiation therapy in exceptional cases. Currently, these patients benefit from multimodal treatment, such as cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Despite good overall results, this treatment modality is still widely debated. The following study is designed to assess the papers about the possible application and utility of HIPEC in GC. A search in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases was performed to assess the papers devoted to the role of HIPEC in GC treatment; a literature search was performed until March 21st; and, finally, 50 studies with a total number of 3946 patients were analyzed. According to the most recent data, it seems to be reasonable to limit the duration of HIPEC to the shortest effective time. Moreover, the drugs used in HIPEC need to have equal concentrations and the same solvent. Perioperative chemotherapy needs to be reported in detail and, furthermore, the term “morbidity” should be defined more clearly by the authors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marek Mazurek
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Voivodship Hospital in Siedlce, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland;
| | - Małgorzata Szlendak
- Department of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland; (M.S.); (J.B.); (R.M.)
- Department of Oncology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Alicja Forma
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland;
| | - Jacek Baj
- Department of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland; (M.S.); (J.B.); (R.M.)
| | - Ryszard Maciejewski
- Department of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland; (M.S.); (J.B.); (R.M.)
| | | | - Luigi Marano
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy; (L.M.); (F.R.)
| | - Franco Roviello
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy; (L.M.); (F.R.)
| | - Karol Polom
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-070 Gdansk, Poland;
| | - Robert Sitarz
- Department of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland; (M.S.); (J.B.); (R.M.)
- Department of Surgical Oncology, St. John’s Cancer Center, 20-090 Lublin, Poland
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|