1
|
Xing Z, Li Y. ASO Author Reflections: Clinical Stage I Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients with Gross Hematuria: Radical Nephrectomy or Partial Nephrectomy? Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:3556-3557. [PMID: 38319514 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14988-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuo Xing
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
- Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine, Changsha, China
| | - Yuan Li
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huang RS, Chow R, Chopade P, Mihalache A, Hasan A, Boldt G, Glicksman R, Simone CB, Lock M, Raman S. Dose-response of localized renal cell carcinoma after stereotactic body radiation therapy: A meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2024; 194:110216. [PMID: 38462092 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment option for primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), particularly in patients who are unsuitable for surgery. The aim of this review is to assess the effect of increasing the biologically equivalent dose (BED) via various radiation fractionation regimens on clinical outcomes. METHODS A literature search was conducted in PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to October 2023. Studies reporting on patients with localized RCC receiving SBRT were included to determine its effectiveness on local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival. A random effects model was used to meta-regress clinical outcomes relative to the BED for each study and heterogeneity was assessed by I2. RESULTS A total of 724 patients with RCC from 22 studies were included, with a mean age of 72.7 years (range: 44.0-81.0). Local control was excellent with an estimate of 99 % (95 %CI: 97-100 %, I2 = 19 %), 98 % (95 %CI: 96-99 %, I2 = 8 %), and 94 % (95 %CI: 90-97 %, I2 = 11 %) at one year, two years, and five years respectively. No definitive association between increasing BED and local control, progression-free survival and overall survival was observed. No publication bias was observed. CONCLUSIONS A significant dose response relationship between oncological outcomes and was not identified, and excellent local control outcomes were observed at the full range of doses. Until new evidence points otherwise, we support current recommendations against routine dose escalation beyond 25-26 Gy in one fraction or 42-48 Gy in three fractions, and to consider de-escalation or compromising target coverage if required to achieve safe organ at risk doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan S Huang
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ronald Chow
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada; New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pradnya Chopade
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrew Mihalache
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Asad Hasan
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gabriel Boldt
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Rachel Glicksman
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Michael Lock
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Srinivas Raman
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wensong W, Fan C, Jianghui Z, Shuai T, Zheng L, Xuehui L, Fangmin C. Correlation between bilateral GFR in patients with localized renal cancer after partial nephrectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 2024; 56:1617-1625. [PMID: 38141102 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03901-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the relationship between the residual glomerular filtration rate (GFR) on the operated side and the GFR on the contralateral side following partial nephrectomy (PN) in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Following institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical records from May 2018 to July 2023, involving 118 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy for unilateral localized kidney tumors (T1-T2). Glomerular filtration rate data were assessed using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography imaging [using 9mTc-DTPA (diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid) renal dynamic imaging]. The independent determinants of postoperative renal function or renal function change were determined using linear regression analysis. In addition, the patient's demographic, clinical, and nephrometry characteristics were collected. RESULTS A total of 58 patients were finally enrolled. The preoperative and postoperative GFR of bilateral kidneys showed a significant positive correlation. Postoperative GFR of the operated kidney was the independent predictor of GFR of contralateral kidney (p = 0.001). Tumor diameter (p = 0.036), age (p = 0.005), and postoperative GFR of the contralateral kidney (p = 0.001) were all independent predictors of postoperative GFR of the operated kidney. ΔGFR1 was the independent predictor of ΔGFR2. Results showed that a more pronounced postoperative decline in GFR on the operated side corresponded to a weaker compensatory capacity of the contralateral-side kidney. CONCLUSIONS During the course of the surgical procedure, the active endeavor to safeguard the renal function of the operated kidney side holds paramount importance, which yields positive outcomes for postoperative kidney function on the contralateral side, consequently contributing to the overall preservation of renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wu Wensong
- Urology, The Third Central Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300170, China
| | - Chang Fan
- Urology, The Third Central Hospital of Tianjin, 83 Jintang Road, Hedong District, Tianjin, 300170, China
- The Third Central Hospital affiliated to Nankai University, Jintang Road, Hedong District, Tianjin, 300170, China
| | - Zhang Jianghui
- Urology, The Third Central Hospital of Tianjin, 83 Jintang Road, Hedong District, Tianjin, 300170, China
- The Third Central Hospital affiliated to Nankai University, Jintang Road, Hedong District, Tianjin, 300170, China
| | - Tang Shuai
- Urology, The Third Central Hospital of Tianjin, 83 Jintang Road, Hedong District, Tianjin, 300170, China
- The Third Central Hospital affiliated to Nankai University, Jintang Road, Hedong District, Tianjin, 300170, China
| | - Lv Zheng
- Urology, The Third Central Hospital of Tianjin, 83 Jintang Road, Hedong District, Tianjin, 300170, China
- The Third Central Hospital affiliated to Nankai University, Jintang Road, Hedong District, Tianjin, 300170, China
| | - Liu Xuehui
- Urology, The Third Central Hospital of Tianjin, 83 Jintang Road, Hedong District, Tianjin, 300170, China
- Nuclear Medicine Department, The Third Central Hospital of Tianjin, 83 Jintang Road, Hedong District, Tianjin, 300170, China
| | - Chen Fangmin
- Urology, The Third Central Hospital of Tianjin, 83 Jintang Road, Hedong District, Tianjin, 300170, China.
- The Third Central Hospital affiliated to Nankai University, Jintang Road, Hedong District, Tianjin, 300170, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sun Z, Zhang Y, Song Y, Guo H, Xia Y, Ma H. Nonlinear Associations of Adipose Tissue Metrics with Short-Term Postoperative Complications in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:3558-3559. [PMID: 38321250 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15004-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Zehua Sun
- Department of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University School of Medicine, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Yumei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University School of Medicine, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Yang Song
- Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, College of Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Hao Guo
- Department of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University School of Medicine, Yantai, Shandong, China.
| | - Yuanhao Xia
- Department of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University School of Medicine, Yantai, Shandong, China.
- Department of Radiology, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, Shandong, China.
| | - Heng Ma
- Department of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University School of Medicine, Yantai, Shandong, China.
- Department of Radiology, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mentessidou A, Djendov F, Long AM, Jackson C. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Nephrectomy for Paediatric Renal Tumors With Focus on Wilms' Tumor. Ann Surg 2024; 279:755-764. [PMID: 37990910 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize and evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) and compare its safety and efficacy with open radical nephrectomy (ORN) in pediatric renal tumors (RT) and Wilms' tumors (WT). BACKGROUND ORN is the gold standard treatment for pediatric RT, consisting predominantly of WT. LRN is gaining popularity but remains controversial in pediatric surgical oncology. METHODS A systematic search was performed for all eligible studies on LRN and comparative studies between LRN and ORN in pediatric RT and WT. Meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, and sensitivity analysis were conducted. The main endpoints were cancer-related outcomes and surgical morbidity. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed. RESULTS No levels I to II studies were identified. LRN was feasible in nearly 1 in 5 pediatric RT and WT after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with pooled mid-term oncological outcomes (<7% local recurrence, >90% event-free survival) comparable with those of ORN. There was no strong evidence of an increased risk of intraoperative tumor spillage, but lymph node harvest was inadequate in LRN. Large tumors crossing the ipsilateral spinal border were associated with a trend for intraoperative complications and positive margins. Pooled complications rate and hospital stay duration were similar between LRN and ORN. Long-term (>3 years) outcomes are unknown. CONCLUSIONS Available level III evidence indicates that LRN is a safe alternative to ORN for carefully selected cases, with similar spillage rates and mid-term oncological outcomes. However, there was no advantage in surgical morbidity and lymph node harvest was inadequate with LRN. Tumor-matched-group studies with long-term follow-up are required. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
|
6
|
Brönimann S, Ged Y, Singla N. Beyond the knife: strategic patient selection for cytoreductive nephrectomy. Curr Opin Urol 2024; 34:210-216. [PMID: 38240477 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To evaluate the current role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) within the context of evolving treatment paradigms, focusing on implications for patient selection. RECENT FINDINGS Two randomized trials failed to show significant benefits from CN for intermediate and poor-risk patients undergoing targeted therapy. Despite this, subgroup analysis and retrospective data suggest potential benefits for a subset of good and intermediate-risk patients. Although currently used risk stratification tools guide CN eligibility, they have limitations, including, subjectivity, perioperative variability, and missing validation. Deferred CN may benefit patients responding to systemic treatment, whereas other patients may benefit from upfront CN. Emerging data supports the value of CN with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in selected patients, emphasizing the need for ongoing trials in the ICI era. SUMMARY The role and timing of CN in mRCC have evolved across therapeutic eras. Although awaiting prospective evidence in the current era of ICI, CN still has a role in the therapeutic approach for a subset of patients. The decision to recommend CN must be personalized and involve multidisciplinary discussions considering both patient- and tumor-related factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Brönimann
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Oncology
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tao B, Zhang H, Zhang G, Liu H, Meng L, Zhu X, Ji X, Jia G, Qi A, Wang C. Management of Nontraumatic Spontaneous Renal Hemorrhage (Wünderlich Syndrome) through Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: A Case Series. Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e942826. [PMID: 38659203 DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.942826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Wünderlich syndrome (WS) is a rare diagnosis of nontraumatic spontaneous renal hemorrhage into the subcapsular, perirenal, or pararenal spaces. Prompt and effective intervention is necessary for an accurate pathological diagnosis and preservation of life. In the current literature, open surgery is the primary option when conservative treatment fails, but there can be serious trauma and corresponding consequences. Herein, we present 3 cases of Wünderlich syndrome managed by robot-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy via a retroperitoneal approach. CASE REPORT Patient 1 was a 44-year-old woman with right flank pain for 6 h. Patient 2 was a 53-year-old woman with a history of diabetes who had pain in her right flank pain and nausea for 1 day. Patient 3 was a 45-year-old man with left flank pain for 1 day. All cases of WS were confirmed by CT. All 3 patients were treated with retroperitoneal robot-assisted nephrectomy after conservative treatment failed. Pathological examination confirmed that patient 1 had angiomyolipoma, and patients 2 and 3 had renal clear cell carcinoma. At the 9-month follow-up, renal function was good and no evidence of recurrence or metastasis has been detected. CONCLUSIONS These cases have highlighted the importance of the clinical history and imaging findings in the diagnosis of Wünderlich syndrome, and show that rapid management can be achieved using robot-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. However, it is crucial to have a skilled surgical team and adequate preoperative preparation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boju Tao
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China (mainland)
| | - Haoxun Zhang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China (mainland)
| | - Guoling Zhang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China (mainland)
| | - Hua Liu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China (mainland)
| | - Le Meng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China (mainland)
| | - Xiangyu Zhu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China (mainland)
| | - Xuran Ji
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China (mainland)
| | - Guang Jia
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China (mainland)
| | - Ao Qi
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China (mainland)
| | - Chunyang Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China (mainland)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dai J, He B, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Hu X, Xu L, Ni Y, Zhang X, Sun G, Zeng H, Shen P, Liu Z. The survival benefit of metastasectomy for metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study. World J Urol 2024; 42:259. [PMID: 38662226 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04973-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to explore the benefit the metastasectomy for patients with metastatic non-clear cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC). METHODS This study enrolled 120 patients with confirmed metastatic non-ccRCC from the RCC database of our center from 2008 to 2021. Patients without metastasectomy were grouped as radical nephrectomy without metastasectomy patients. The clinical outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess potential factors that predict clinical benefits from metastasectomy. RESULTS A total of 100 patients received radical nephrectomy alone, while the remaining 20 patients underwent both radical nephrectomy and metastasectomy. There was no significant difference in age between the two groups. Out of 100 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy, 60 were male, and out of 20 patients who had both radical nephrectomy and metastasectomy, 12 were male. Patients who underwent systemic therapy plus radical nephrectomy and metastasectomy had significantly better PFS (27.1 vs. 14.0, p = 0.032) and OS (67.3 vs. 24.0, p = 0.043) than those who underwent systemic therapy plus radical nephrectomy alone. Furthermore, for patients without liver metastasis (n = 54), systemic therapy plus radical nephrectomy and metastasectomy improved both PFS (p = 0.028) and OS (p = 0.043). Similarly, for patients with metachronous metastasis, systemic therapy plus radical nephrectomy and metastasectomy improved both PFS (p = 0.043) and OS (p = 0.032). None of the patients experienced serious perioperative complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification ≥ III grade). CONCLUSION Metastasectomy in patients with metastatic non-ccRCC may provide clinical benefits in terms of improved PFS and OS, especially in patients without liver metastasis and those with metachronous metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jindong Dai
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Ben He
- Department of Urology, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu/The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, 610014, Sichuan, China
| | - Yaowen Zhang
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Haoran Zhang
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Xu Hu
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Lijing Xu
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Xiamen Hospital, Sichuan University, Xiamen, 361000, China
| | - Yuchao Ni
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Xingming Zhang
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Guangxi Sun
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Hao Zeng
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| | - Pengfei Shen
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| | - Zhenhua Liu
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Voss MH, Motzer RJ. Adjuvant Immunotherapy for Kidney Cancer - A New Strategy with New Challenges. N Engl J Med 2024; 390:1432-1433. [PMID: 38631007 DOI: 10.1056/nejme2402364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Martin H Voss
- From Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Choueiri TK, Tomczak P, Park SH, Venugopal B, Ferguson T, Symeonides SN, Hajek J, Chang YH, Lee JL, Sarwar N, Haas NB, Gurney H, Sawrycki P, Mahave M, Gross-Goupil M, Zhang T, Burke JM, Doshi G, Melichar B, Kopyltsov E, Alva A, Oudard S, Topart D, Hammers H, Kitamura H, McDermott DF, Silva A, Winquist E, Cornell J, Elfiky A, Burgents JE, Perini RF, Powles T. Overall Survival with Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2024; 390:1359-1371. [PMID: 38631003 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2312695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant pembrolizumab therapy after surgery for renal-cell carcinoma was approved on the basis of a significant improvement in disease-free survival in the KEYNOTE-564 trial. Whether the results regarding overall survival from the third prespecified interim analysis of the trial would also favor pembrolizumab was uncertain. METHODS In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) participants with clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma who had an increased risk of recurrence after surgery to receive pembrolizumab (at a dose of 200 mg) or placebo every 3 weeks for up to 17 cycles (approximately 1 year) or until recurrence, the occurrence of unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent. A significant improvement in disease-free survival according to investigator assessment (the primary end point) was shown previously. Overall survival was the key secondary end point. Safety was a secondary end point. RESULTS A total of 496 participants were assigned to receive pembrolizumab and 498 to receive placebo. As of September 15, 2023, the median follow-up was 57.2 months. The disease-free survival benefit was consistent with that in previous analyses (hazard ratio for recurrence or death, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.87). A significant improvement in overall survival was observed with pembrolizumab as compared with placebo (hazard ratio for death, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.87; P = 0.005). The estimated overall survival at 48 months was 91.2% in the pembrolizumab group, as compared with 86.0% in the placebo group; the benefit was consistent across key subgroups. Pembrolizumab was associated with a higher incidence of serious adverse events of any cause (20.7%, vs. 11.5% with placebo) and of grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to pembrolizumab or placebo (18.6% vs. 1.2%). No deaths were attributed to pembrolizumab therapy. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant pembrolizumab was associated with a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival, as compared with placebo, among participants with clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma at increased risk for recurrence after surgery. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck; KEYNOTE-564 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03142334.).
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage
- Adjuvants, Immunologic/adverse effects
- Adjuvants, Immunologic/therapeutic use
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery
- Double-Blind Method
- Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Kidney Neoplasms/mortality
- Kidney Neoplasms/surgery
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use
- Disease-Free Survival
- Combined Modality Therapy
- Survival Analysis
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toni K Choueiri
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Piotr Tomczak
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Se Hoon Park
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Balaji Venugopal
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Tom Ferguson
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Stefan N Symeonides
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Jaroslav Hajek
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Yen-Hwa Chang
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Jae-Lyun Lee
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Naveed Sarwar
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Naomi B Haas
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Howard Gurney
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Piotr Sawrycki
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Mauricio Mahave
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Marine Gross-Goupil
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Tian Zhang
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - John M Burke
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Gurjyot Doshi
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Bohuslav Melichar
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Evgeniy Kopyltsov
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Ajjai Alva
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Stephane Oudard
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Delphine Topart
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Hans Hammers
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Hiroshi Kitamura
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - David F McDermott
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Adriano Silva
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Eric Winquist
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Jerry Cornell
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Aymen Elfiky
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Joseph E Burgents
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Rodolfo F Perini
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| | - Thomas Powles
- From Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) - all in Boston; Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan (P.T.), and Provincial Hospital in Torun, Torun (P.S.) - both in Poland; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-L.L.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and the University of Glasgow, Glasgow (B.V.), Edinburgh Cancer Centre and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (S.N.S.), and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (N.S.), Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute (T.P.), and Queen Mary University of London (T.P.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA (T.F.), and Maquarie University, Sydney (H.G.) - both in Australia; Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava (J.H.), and Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc (B.M.) - all in the Czech Republic; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.); Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia (N.B.H.); Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile (M.M.); University Hospital Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux (M.G.-G.), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, Paris (S.O.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier (D.T.) - all in France; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (T.Z., H.H.), and Texas Oncology-Houston, Houston (G.D.); Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO (J.M.B.); Omsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia (E.K.); the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (A.A.); the University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (H.K.); Instituto de Cancer e Transplante de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil (A.S.); the London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada (E.W.); and Merck, Rahway, NJ (J.C., A.E., J.E.B., R.F.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Li C, Lu B, Zhao Q, Lu Q, Wang J, Sun P, Xu H, Huang B. Development and validation of a clinical and ultrasound features-based nomogram for preoperative differentiation of renal urothelial carcinoma and central renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 2024; 42:227. [PMID: 38598055 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04935-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to develop and validate an ultrasound (US)-based nomogram for the preoperative differentiation of renal urothelial carcinoma (rUC) from central renal cell carcinoma (c-RCC). METHODS Clinical data and US images of 655 patients with 655 histologically confirmed malignant renal tumors (521 c-RCCs and 134 rUCs) were collected and divided into training (n = 455) and validation (n = 200) cohorts according to examination dates. Conventional US and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) tumor features were analyzed to determine those that could discriminate rUC from c-RCC. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was applied to screen clinical and US features for the differentiation of rUC from c-RCC. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, a diagnostic model of rUC was constructed and visualized as a nomogram. The diagnostic model's performance was assessed in the training and validation cohorts by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration plot. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to assess the clinical usefulness of the US-based nomogram. RESULTS Seven features of both clinical features and ultrasound imaging were selected to build the diagnostic model. The nomogram achieved favorable discrimination in the training (AUC = 0.996, 95% CI: 0.993-0.999) and validation (AUC = 0.995, 95% CI: 0.974, 1.000) cohorts, and good calibration (Brier scores: 0.019 and 0.016, respectively). DCA demonstrated the clinical usefulness of the US-based nomogram. CONCLUSION A noninvasive clinical and US-based nomogram combining conventional US and CEUS features possesses good predictive value for differentiating rUC from c-RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cuixian Li
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Fudan University, No. 180 of Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Beilei Lu
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Qing Zhao
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Qing Lu
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Jingjing Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Pei Sun
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Huixiong Xu
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Fudan University, No. 180 of Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Beijian Huang
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Fudan University, No. 180 of Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Selene II, Lei F, Dhahri A, Yee JCT, Huang B, Jose J, Myint Z. CLO24-077: Role of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Era of Immunotherapy: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB). J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2024; 22:CLO24-077. [PMID: 38580239 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Bin Huang
- 1University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | - Jemin Jose
- 2King's Daughter Medical Center, Ashland, KY
| | - Zin Myint
- 1University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pupo DG, Boaretto D, Ghomeshi A, Lopez D, Prabhakar P, Avudaiappan AP, Eldefrawy A, Manoharan M, Caso J. CLO24-070: Partial Versus Radical Nephrectomy: An Age-Wise Comparison of the National Cancer Database. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2024; 22:CLO24-070. [PMID: 38579858 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Dianelis Gonzalez Pupo
- 1Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Hospital South Florida, Miami, FL
- 2Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL
| | - Daniel Boaretto
- 1Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Hospital South Florida, Miami, FL
- 2Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL
| | - Armin Ghomeshi
- 1Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Hospital South Florida, Miami, FL
- 2Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL
| | - Dominique Lopez
- 1Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Hospital South Florida, Miami, FL
- 2Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL
- 3Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce, Puerto Rico
| | - Pushan Prabhakar
- 1Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Hospital South Florida, Miami, FL
| | | | - Ahmed Eldefrawy
- 1Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Hospital South Florida, Miami, FL
- 2Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL
| | - Murugesan Manoharan
- 1Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Hospital South Florida, Miami, FL
- 2Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL
| | - Jorge Caso
- 1Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Hospital South Florida, Miami, FL
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yamamoto R, Numakura K, Kobayashi M, Nara T, Saito M, Narita S, Habuchi T. Predictive factors of renal function after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in clinical T1b tumors. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:154. [PMID: 38564051 PMCID: PMC10987366 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01848-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has been shown to be a safe and effective method for treatment of small renal tumors, including clinical T1b renal cell carcinoma (RCC); however, the impact of RAPN for cT1b renal tumors on renal function is not well understood. In this retrospective study, 50 patients who underwent RAPN for cT1b renal tumors were evaluated for pre- and post-operative renal function and perioperative clinical factors. Renal function was assessed using the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline and on postoperative days (POD) 1, 7, 30, and 180.A significant renal functional decline was defined as ≥ 15% reduction in eGFR at POD180 compared with eGFR at baseline. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for renal function decline, including age, sex, RENAL nephrometry score, operative time, and estimated blood loss. The median patient age was 62 years, and the median tumor diameter and RENAL nephrometry score were 44 mm (IQR 43-50) and 8 (IQR 7-9), respectively. Of these patients, 16 (36%) showed a significant renal functional decline at POD 180. In the multivariate analysis, the L component of the RENAL nephrometry score and an estimated blood loss of 200 mL or more were identified as significant risk factors for renal functional decline. These findings suggest that the preoperatively definable L component of the RENAL nephrometry score and intraoperative blood loss, which may be modifiable factors, play significant roles in post-RAPN renal function decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryohei Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| | - Kazuyuki Numakura
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan.
| | - Mizuki Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| | - Taketoshi Nara
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Saito
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| | - Shintaro Narita
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| | - Tomonori Habuchi
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sun Z, Xia Y, Zhang Y, Guo H, Song Y, Ma H. Nonlinear Associations of Visceral and Perirenal Fat with Short-Term Postoperative Complications in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:2208-2211. [PMID: 38252263 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14931-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Zehua Sun
- Department of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University School of Medicine, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Yuanhao Xia
- Department of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University School of Medicine, Yantai, Shandong, China
- Department of Radiology, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Yumei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University School of Medicine, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Hao Guo
- Department of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University School of Medicine, Yantai, Shandong, China.
| | - Yang Song
- Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, College of Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
| | - Heng Ma
- Department of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University School of Medicine, Yantai, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhang H, Li F, Jing M, Xi H, Zheng Y, Liu J. Nomogram combining pre-operative clinical characteristics and spectral CT parameters for predicting the WHO/ISUP pathological grading in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:1185-1193. [PMID: 38340180 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04199-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a novel clinical-spectral-computed tomography (CT) nomogram incorporating clinical characteristics and spectral CT parameters for the preoperative prediction of the WHO/ISUP pathological grade in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). METHODS Seventy-three ccRCC patients who underwent spectral CT were included in this retrospective analysis from December 2020 to June 2023. The subjects were pathologically divided into low- and high-grade groups (WHO/ISUP 1/2, n = 52 and WHO/ISUP 3/4, n = 21, respectively). Information on clinical characteristics, conventional CT imaging features, and spectral CT parameters was collected. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to create a nomogram combing clinical data and image data for preoperatively predicting the pathological grade of ccRCC, and the area under the curve (AUC) was utilized to assess the predictive performance of the model. RESULTS Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that age, systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and the slope of the spectrum curve in the cortex phase (CP-K) were independent predictors for predicting high-grade ccRCC. The clinical-spectral-CT model exhibited high evaluation efficacy, with an AUC of 0.933 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.878-0.998; sensitivity: 0.810; specificity: 0.923). The calibration curve revealed that the predicted probability of the clinical-spectral-CT nomogram could better fit the actual probability, with high calibration. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed that the model had a good fitness (χ2 = 5.574, p = 0.695). CONCLUSION The clinical-spectral-CT nomogram has the potential to predict WHO/ISUP grading of ccRCC preoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongyu Zhang
- Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Fukai Li
- Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Mengyuan Jing
- Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Huaze Xi
- Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yali Zheng
- Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Jianli Liu
- Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
- Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China.
- Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gong Z, Xia C, Kong W, Yang D. Renal cell carcinoma in horseshoe kidney treated with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Asian J Surg 2024; 47:1945-1946. [PMID: 38233275 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.12.165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- ZhiCong Gong
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Chengxin Xia
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Weihao Kong
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
| | - Delin Yang
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Roussel E, Bertolo R, Ciccarese C, Marandino L, Marchioni M, Campi R, Albersen M. Re: E. Jason Abel, Viraj A. Master, Philippe E. Spiess, et al. The Selection for Cytoreductive Nephrectomy (SCREEN) Score: Improving Surgical Risk Stratification by Integrating Common Radiographic Features. Eur Urol Oncol. 2023;6:266-274. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:304-305. [PMID: 37981494 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Eduard Roussel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Chiara Ciccarese
- Department of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Marandino
- Skin and Renal Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Urology Unit, University G. d'Annunzio, Chieti, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| | - Maarten Albersen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Scheipner L, Incesu RB, Morra S, Baudo A, Assad A, Jannello LMI, Siech C, de Angelis M, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Briganti A, Chun FKH, Tilki D, Longo N, Carmignani L, De Cobelli O, Pichler M, Ahyai S, Karakiewicz PI. Prognostic Significance of Radiographic Lymph Node Invasion in Contemporary Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:164-170. [PMID: 37981546 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To test the prognostic significance of radiographic cN-stage in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients with low metastatic burden (1 site of metastasis), relying on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER 2010-2020). METHODS Included were mRCC patients with 1 site of metastasis, treated with systemic therapy without cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN). Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox-regression models addressed cancer-specific mortality (CSM) according to radiographic cN-stage (ccN1 vs. ccN0). Separate subgroup analyses were performed, addressing radiographic N-stage in patients with distinct histology (clear-cell vs. RCC not otherwise specified [RCC NOS]). RESULTS Of 1756 mRCC patients, 545 (31%) were radiographic cN1. Overall, the median CSM-free survival of the cohort was 11 months. Median CSM-free survival was 8 vs. 14 months in radiographic cN1 vs. cN0 mRCC patients (HR 1.49, P < .0001). In multivariable Cox regression analyses, radiographic cN1 status was an independent predictor of higher CSM (HR 1.39; P = .01). In subgroup analyses, addressing patients with clear-cell histology and patients with RCC NOS separately, radiographic cN1 status remained independently associated with a higher CSM in both groups (clear-cell: HR 1.36; P = .03; RCC NOS: HR 2.06; P = .009). CONCLUSION In mRCC patients with low metastatic burden, presence or absence of radiographic lymph node invasion results in a clinically meaningful discrimination between those with poor prognosis and others. In consequence, consideration of radiographic lymph node invasion might be of great value in this specific population of mRCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Scheipner
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
| | - Reha-Baris Incesu
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Simone Morra
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Anis Assad
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolin Siech
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Martin Pichler
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abel EJ, Master VA, Spiess PE, Raman JD, Shapiro DD, Sexton WJ, Zemp L, Patil D, Lauer K, Allen GO, Matin SF, Karam JA. The Selection for Cytoreductive Nephrectomy (SCREEN) Score: Improving Surgical Risk Stratification by Integrating Common Radiographic Features. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:266-274. [PMID: 37442673 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Careful patient selection is critical when considering cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) but few studies have investigated the prognostic value of radiologic features that measure tumor burden. OBJECTIVE To develop a prognostic model to improve CN selection with integration of common radiologic features with known prognostic factors associated with mortality in the first year following surgery. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS Data were analyzed for consecutive patients with mRCC treated with upfront CN at five institutions from 2006 to 2017. Univariable and multivariable models were used to evaluate radiographic features and known risk factors for associations with overall survival. Relevant factors were used to create the SCREEN model and compared to the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) model for predictive accuracy and clinical usefulness. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 914 patients with mRCC were treated with upfront CN during the study period. Seven independently predictive variables were used in the SCREEN score: three or more metastatic sites, total metastatic tumor burden ≥5 cm, bone metastasis, systemic symptoms, low serum hemoglobin, low serum albumin, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio ≥4. Predictive accuracy measured as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves was 0.76 for the SCREEN score and 0.55 for the IMDC model. Decision curve analysis showed that the SCREEN model was useful beyond the IMDC classifier for threshold first-year mortality probabilities between 15% and 70%. CONCLUSIONS The SCREEN score had higher predictive accuracy for first-year mortality compared to the IMDC scheme in a multi-institutional cohort and may be used to improve CN selection. PATIENT SUMMARY This study provides a model to improve selection of patients with metastatic kidney cancer who may benefit from surgical removal of the primary kidney tumor. We found that radiographic measurements of the tumor burden predicted the risk of death in the first year after surgery. The model can be used to improve decision-making by these patients and their physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Jason Abel
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
| | - Viraj A Master
- Department of Urology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jay D Raman
- Department of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Daniel D Shapiro
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wade J Sexton
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Logan Zemp
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dattatraya Patil
- Department of Urology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kate Lauer
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Glenn O Allen
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jose A Karam
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Siech C, Incesu RB, Morra S, Scheipner L, Baudo A, Jannello LMI, de Angelis M, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Tilki D, Longo N, Carmignani L, de Cobelli O, Ahyai S, Briganti A, Mandel P, Kluth LA, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Differences in other-cause mortality in metastatic renal cell carcinoma according to partial vs. radical nephrectomy and age: A propensity score matched study. Surg Oncol 2024; 53:102047. [PMID: 38359547 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It is unknown whether the benefit from partial nephrectomy regarding lower other-cause mortality is applicable to older patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database, patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy, were stratified according to age (<60, 60-69, and ≥70 years). After propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and multivariable Cox regression models were used. RESULTS Of 2,390 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, 885 (37%) were aged <60 years, and 90 (10%) underwent partial nephrectomy; 824 (34%) were aged 60-69 years, and 61 (7%) underwent partial nephrectomy; and 681 (29%) were aged ≥70 years, and 64 (9%) underwent partial nephrectomy. After propensity score matching, in patients aged <60 years, partial nephrectomy was associated with lower other-cause mortality (hazard ratio 0.22; p = 0.02); in patients aged 60-69 years, partial nephrectomy was associated with lower other-cause mortality (hazard ratio 0.38; p = 0.03); but not in patients aged ≥70 years. DISCUSSION In metastatic renal cell carcinoma, partial nephrectomy is associated with lower other-cause mortality in patients aged <60 years and in patients aged 60-69 years, but not in patients aged ≥70 years. In consequence, consideration of partial nephrectomy might be of great value in younger metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Reha-Baris Incesu
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Liu Y, Cheng W, Yang Q, Han Y, Jiang Q, Yang Y, Zhang H. Mining and validation of prognosis of various visceral metastasis in renal cell carcinoma: a study based on SEER database. Updates Surg 2024; 76:657-676. [PMID: 38165526 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01703-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Our study was aimed to analyze a substantial of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients, research the high-risk factors and prognostic factors of metastasis, and thoroughly examine the effects of primary site surgery, lymph node dissection (LND), and chemotherapy on the prognosis of different visceral metastases. The baseline characteristics were characterized, and logistic regression was used to predict the risk factors for metastasis. Prognostic factors of metastatic RCC were assessed using batch univariate and multivariate Cox regression, with adjustments made through PSM. Next, the Kaplan-Meier method was employed to assess OS and create the survival curve. Logistic regression identified risk factors for metastasis: male gender [OR, 1.223; P < 0.001], Hist clear (OR, 9.37; P < 0.001), Hist papillary (OR, 2.49; P < 0.001), and TTX (OR, 23.33; P < 0.001). We found several independent prognostic variables: among which chemotherapy (HR, 0.64), local LND (HR, 0.67), and primary site surgery (HR, 0.97) were associated with better OS. Further study results demonstrated that all kinds of visceral metastasis except for liver metastasis in the operation group had substantially better prognoses than those in the non-operation group (P < 0.05). Regional LND had no discernible impact on survival. Patients with liver, lung, and distant lymph node (LN) metastasis benefited from chemotherapy (P < 0.05), but the bone and brain metastasis did not significantly benefit from treatment (P > 0.05). We recommend primary surgery for different types of visceral metastases except liver metastasis. Routine regional LND is not recommended. Chemotherapy should be considered for patients with lung, distant LN, and liver metastases, but not for those with bone and brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Liu
- School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Wenjuan Cheng
- School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Qin Yang
- School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Yucheng Han
- School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Qing Jiang
- School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Yuanyuan Yang
- School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Haimin Zhang
- School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200072, China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Siech C, Morra S, Scheipner L, Baudo A, Jannello LMI, de Angelis M, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Longo N, Carmignani L, de Cobelli O, Ahyai S, Briganti A, Mandel P, Kluth LA, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Married Status Affects Rates of Treatment and Mortality in Male and Female Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Across all Stages. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:593-598. [PMID: 38369387 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The association between treatment rates and cancer specific mortality (CSM) according to married status in male and female clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients across all stages is unknown. PATIENT AND METHODS Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2020), ccRCC patients were stratified according to married status (married vs. unmarried). Logistic regression models addressed treatment rates; Cox regression models addressed CSM rates. RESULTS Of 98,142 patients, 43,999 (72%) males and 20,287 (55%) females were married. In stage-specific analyses, married status independently predicted higher nephrectomy rates in males and females (all P ≤ .03). In stage IV, married status predicted higher systemic therapy rate in males (P < .001), but not in females. In survival analyses, married males exhibited lower CSM rates relative to unmarried males (all P ≤ .02). Conversely, married females exhibited lower CSM rates only in stages I and III (all P ≤ .02), but not in stages II and IV. In subgroup analyses of T1aN0M0 patients, married status was associated with higher partial nephrectomy rates in both males and females (all P ≤ .005). CONCLUSION In ccRCC, married status invariably predicts higher rates of guideline recommended surgical management (nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy). Moreover, even after adjustment for treatment type, married status independently predicted lower CSM rates in males across all stages. However, the effect of married status in females is only operational in stages I and III. Lack of association between married status in stages II and IV may potentially be explained by stronger association with treatment assignment which reduces the residual effect on survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia M I Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Al-Rusan OM, Patil D, Master VA, Osunkoya AO. A Contemporary Clinicopathologic Analysis of Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma and Vena Cava Involvement. Int J Surg Pathol 2024; 32:279-285. [PMID: 37306114 DOI: 10.1177/10668969231177264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is occasionally associated with vena cava involvement. Despite recent advances in therapeutic modalities, the 5-year survival in this population continues to be poor. Therefore, further studies are required to better characterize this patient population, especially from the clinicopathologic standpoint. A comprehensive review of patients with RCC and vena cava involvement managed at our institution from 2014 to 2022 was performed. Multiple clinicopathologic parameters including follow-up were obtained. A total of 114 patients were identified. The mean patient age was 63 years (range: 30-84 years). The cohort consisted of 78/114 (68%) males and 36/114 (32%) females. The mean primary tumor size (excluding tumor thrombus) was 11 cm. The majority of tumors (104/114, 91%) were unifocal. Tumor stages were categorized as follows: pT3b (51/114, 44%), pT3c (52/114, 46%), and pT4 (11/114, 10%). Most of the tumors were clear cell RCC 89/114 (78%), although other more aggressive RCC subtypes were also present. Most tumors were WHO/ISUP grade 3 (44/114, 39%) or 4 (67/114, 59%) with sarcomatoid differentiation present in 39/67 (58%). Necrosis was present in 94/114 (82%) tumors. Twenty-three of 114 (20%) tumors were categorized as pM1 and the ipsilateral adrenal gland was the most common site of metastasis. Of the 91 patients categorized as pM, not applicable at nephrectomy, 42/91 (46%) subsequently developed metastasis, most frequently to the lung. Of all patients, only 16/114 (14%) had positive vascular margins and 7/114 (6%) had positive soft tissue margins despite having very advanced disease and a subset considered inoperable at other centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar M Al-Rusan
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Dattatraya Patil
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Viraj A Master
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Adeboye O Osunkoya
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Pathology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Perini MV, Ischia J, Woon D, Bhaskar J, Starkey G, Qi S, Wetherell D, Ellard L, McCall P, Miles LF, Seevanayagam S. A novel two-stage approach to the treatment of renal cell carcinoma with intra-cardiac tumour extension and Budd-Chiari syndrome. BJU Int 2024; 133:480-486. [PMID: 38102752 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To present the early results of a new technique for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma with intra-cardiac tumour extension and Budd-Chiari syndrome. PATIENTS AND METHODS The first stage involves transdiaphragmatic debulking of the right heart, inferior vena cava (IVC) and hepatic veins via median sternotomy, followed by a purse-string suture placed in the IVC below the hepatic veins. The second stage is performed separately and involves en bloc resection of the affected kidney, and IVC and vascular reconstruction via an abdominal incision. RESULTS Three of five patients presented with clinical Budd-Chiari syndrome; two had radiological features only. The median time between surgical procedures was 12 days (IQR 13 days). Four of the five patients had a R0 resection. While all five patients successfully completed both operative stages, one patient died 22 days after the second stage. Of the remaining four, all survive with no disease recurrence. CONCLUSION While we continue to compile longer-term data for a larger follow-up series, these preliminary findings show the feasibility of this technique and support the development of this programme of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcos V Perini
- Department of Surgery (Austin Health), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Victorian Liver Transplant Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joseph Ischia
- Department of Surgery (Austin Health), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Urology Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dixon Woon
- Urology Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jayapadman Bhaskar
- Brian F. Buxton Cardiac and Thoracic Aortic Surgery Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Graham Starkey
- Victorian Liver Transplant Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sara Qi
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Louise Ellard
- Department of Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter McCall
- Department of Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lachlan F Miles
- Department of Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Siven Seevanayagam
- Brian F. Buxton Cardiac and Thoracic Aortic Surgery Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jensen CG, Dybdahl M, Valtersson J, Mussmann BR, Duus LA, Junker T, Pietersen PI, Lund L, Welch BT, Graumann O. Percutaneous Image-Guided Cryoablation of Endophytic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2024; 47:453-461. [PMID: 38483602 PMCID: PMC10997531 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03633-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Endophytic renal cancer treatment is a challenge. Due to difficulties in endophytic tumor visualization during surgical extirpation, image-guided percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) is an attractive alternative. The minimally invasive nature of PCA makes it favorable for comorbid patients as well as patients in which surgery is contraindicated. Oncological outcomes and complications after PCA of endophytic biopsy-proven renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were reviewed in this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients were included after a multidisciplinary team conference from January 2015 to November 2021. Inclusion criteria were endophytic biopsy-proven T1 RCC treated with PCA with one year of follow-up. Complications were reported according to the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) classification system and the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) system. Major complications were defined as a grade ≥ 3 according to the CDC. RESULTS Fifty-six patients were included with a total of 56 endophytic tumors treated during 61 PCA sessions. The median RENAL nephrometry score was 9 (IQR 2), and the mean tumor size was 25.7 mm (SD ± 8.9 mm). Mean hospitalization time was 0.39 (SD ± 1.1) days. At a mean follow-up of 996 days (SD ± 559), 86% of tumors were recurrence free after one PCA. No patients progressed to metastatic disease. According to the CIRSE classification, 10.7% (n = 6) had grade 3 complications, and 5.4% (n = 3) had CDC major complications. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that PCA of endophytic biopsy-proven T1 RCC is safe with few major complications and excellent local tumor control rates at almost three-year mean follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3: Retrospective cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Greve Jensen
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Medicine, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark
- Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology - UNIFY, SDU, Odense, Denmark
| | - Marco Dybdahl
- Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology - UNIFY, SDU, Odense, Denmark
| | - John Valtersson
- Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology - UNIFY, SDU, Odense, Denmark
| | - Bo Redder Mussmann
- Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology - UNIFY, SDU, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Radiology, OUH, Odense, Denmark
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Louise Aarup Duus
- Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology - UNIFY, SDU, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Radiology, OUH, Odense, Denmark
| | - Theresa Junker
- Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology - UNIFY, SDU, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Urology, OUH, Odense, Denmark
| | - Pia Iben Pietersen
- Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology - UNIFY, SDU, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Radiology, OUH, Odense, Denmark
| | - Lars Lund
- Department of Urology, OUH, Odense, Denmark
| | - Brian T Welch
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ole Graumann
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Medicine, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark.
- Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology - UNIFY, SDU, Odense, Denmark.
- Department of Radiology, Aarhus University, Arhus, Denmark.
- Aarhus University, Arhus, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hakimi K, Campbell SC, Nguyen MV, Rathi N, Wang L, Meagher MF, Rini BI, Ornstein M, McKay RR, Derweesh IH. PADRES: a phase 2 clinical trial of neoadjuvant axitinib for complex partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2024; 133:425-431. [PMID: 37916303 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report the results of PADRES (Prior Axitinib as a Determinant of Outcome of Renal Surgery, NCT03438708), a study investigating neoadjuvant axitinib for tumours of high complexity with imperative indication for partial nephrectomy (PN). METHODS We conducted a single-arm phase II clinical trial of localized (cT1b-cT3M0) clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with imperative indications for nephron preservation, where PN is a high-risk procedure due to complexity (RENAL score 10-12). Axitinib 5 mg was administered twice daily for 8 weeks with repeat imaging at completion, followed by surgery. The primary outcome was successful completion of planned PN following axitinib treatment. Secondary objectives included changes in tumour diameter, RENAL nephrometry score, renal function and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v1.1, and surgical complications. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients were enrolled (median age 69 years). Prior to therapy, twenty patients (74.0%) had ≥ clinical T3a staged tumours. Axitinib resulted in reductions in tumour diameter (7.5 vs 6.2 cm; P < 0.001) and RENAL score (11 vs 10; P < 0.001). Nine patients (33.3%) had partial response based on RECIST and nine (33.3%) were clinically downstaged. PN was performed in twenty patients (74.0%); twenty-five patients (96.2%) had negative margins. Six patients (22.2%) had Clavien III-IV complications. The median change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (preoperative to last follow-up) was 8.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 . CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant axitnib resulted in reductions in tumour size and complexity, enabling safe and feasible PN and functional preservation in patients with complex renal masses and imperative indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Hakimi
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | - Mimi V Nguyen
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Nityam Rathi
- Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Luke Wang
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Margaret F Meagher
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Brian I Rini
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Moshe Ornstein
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rana R McKay
- Department of Medicine, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ithaar H Derweesh
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Matsukawa A, Yanagisawa T, Shimizu K, Shariat SF, Kimura T, Miki J. Percutaneous cryoablation of renal cell carcinomas in patients with Von Hippel-Lindau disease: Functional and oncological outcomes. Int J Urol 2024; 31:448-451. [PMID: 38168039 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kanichiro Shimizu
- Department of General Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Li Z, Li S, Li G, Yu T, Zhang Z. Clear-cell renal cell carcinoma(ccRCC) with hemangioblastoma(HB)-like features: A rare case report and literature review. Asian J Surg 2024; 47:1859-1860. [PMID: 38182515 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.12.161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Li
- Department of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Shahekou Street, Dalian, 116023, Liaoning Province, China.
| | - Shike Li
- Graduate School of Dalian Medical University, Lvshun South Road, Dalian, 116044, Liaoning Province, China.
| | - Guangsen Li
- Department of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Shahekou Street, Dalian, 116023, Liaoning Province, China.
| | - Tingting Yu
- Department of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Shahekou Street, Dalian, 116023, Liaoning Province, China.
| | - Zhuo Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Shahekou Street, Dalian, 116023, Liaoning Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pigg RA, Raja JY, Babar T, Li Y, Li M, Huang J, Gunn AJ. Safety and Technical Feasibility of Percutaneous Renal Cryoablation of Central Tumors without Pyeloperfusion. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2024; 35:533-540. [PMID: 38219902 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the safety and technical success of percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) without pyeloperfusion in 94 patients with central renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of all central renal tumors treated by PCA without pyeloperfusion was performed. Central tumors were defined as those involving the renal sinus fat on preprocedural cross-sectional imaging. Patient demographics and baseline tumor characteristics were recorded. The details of the PCA procedure, primary and secondary technical success, rates of local recurrence, adverse events (AEs), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were compiled. RESULTS Ninety-four patients (48 females [51%]; mean age, 68.2 years [range, 38-87 years]) with 94 central renal tumors were included. The mean maximal tumor diameter and mean RENAL nephrometry score were 37 mm (range, 15-67 mm) and 8 (range, 4-11), respectively. Primary technical success was achieved in 94% (n = 88) of procedures. Of the patients who did not achieve primary technical success, 3 underwent successful repeat PCA (secondary technical success, 97%; n = 91/94). The other 3 patients were surveilled for residual disease. Twenty-four patients (26%) required hydrodissection during PCA. Six patients (6%) experienced major AEs after PCA including hemorrhage requiring embolization (n = 3), hemorrhage requiring transfusions with admission (n = 2), and perinephric abscess necessitating drain placement (n = 1). Twenty-two patients (23%) experienced minor AEs. Nine patients (10%) experienced local recurrence during the follow-up period. OS was 94% (n = 88/94), whereas CSS was 98% (n = 92/94) during the study follow-up period (mean, 16 months [range, 1-102 months]). CONCLUSIONS PCA of central renal tumors appears to be safe with high rates of technical success, even without the use of pyeloperfusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard A Pigg
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Junaid Y Raja
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Tarik Babar
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Yufeng Li
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Mei Li
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Junjian Huang
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Andrew J Gunn
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
McCloskey C, Jacques A, McCloskey D, Tibballs J. Percutaneous microwave ablation of T1a renal cell carcinomas: A 10-year single-center retrospective review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 68:297-302. [PMID: 38477383 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Partial nephrectomy is currently the preferred treatment option for T1a renal cell carcinomas (RCC), with nephron-sparing techniques, including microwave ablation, becoming more common in select patients. Primary aims are to document outcomes of microwave ablation for T1a RCCs in an Australian tertiary centre to add to the evidence for its safety and efficacy. METHODS The prospectively maintained Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Interventional Radiology database was retrospectively searched for all Renal Microwave ablations completed between June 2012 and February 2022. This database and a combination of hospital programmes including Agfa Impax PACS, Bossnet digital medical record and iSoft Clinical Manager were used to extract the relevant data which was anonymized and entered into an Excel spreadsheet for analysis. RESULTS Forty-eight patients underwent microwave ablation for 50 tumours. Of these, there were two local and two distant recurrences. A fifth patient had metastases on presentation. Higher local recurrence rates were associated with larger tumour size (P = 0.043). Tumour proximity to the collecting system <4 mm was associated with higher rates of complications (P = 0.020). RENAL scores did not show statistically significant correlation with complications (P = 0.092) or local or distant recurrence. Notably, the study follow-up time was longer than many comparative studies (mean = 2796, ~7.66 years censoring for death and mean = 832 days, ~2.28 years not censoring for death). CONCLUSION Consistent with the literature, this study further demonstrates that microwave ablation is a safe and efficacious option for treatment of T1a RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassie McCloskey
- Medical Imaging Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Angela Jacques
- Institute for Health Research, The University of Notre Dame, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Dylan McCloskey
- St John of God Health Care, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jonathan Tibballs
- Medical Imaging Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Shim GY, Kim MS, Kim HJ, Park Y, Kim SW, Yoo MC. A 42-year-old patient with renal cell carcinoma presenting as low back pain: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e37639. [PMID: 38552083 PMCID: PMC10977550 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000037639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common renal neoplasm, accounting for 2.4% of all cancers in Korea. Although the usual clinical manifestations of RCC include flank pain, hematuria, and palpable mass, RCC is generally characterized by a lack of early warning signs and is mostly discovered incidentally in advanced stage. This case report describes a 42-year-old Korean man diagnosed with giant RCC who presented with simple back pain. PATIENT CONCERNS The clinical manifestation of a 42-year-old Korean man was chronic back pain. DIAGNOSES Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed a 19.1-cm sized heterogeneous enhancing mass on the right kidney and tumor thrombosis extending into inferior vena cava. INTERVENTION Due to the large size of the tumor and extensive tumor thrombosis, the multidisciplinary team decided to administer neoadjuvant chemotherapy and an anticoagulant. Following 12 cycles of treatment with nivolumab and cabozantinib, he underwent a right radical nephrectomy with an adrenalectomy and tumor thrombectomy. OUTCOMES Treatment was successful and posttreatment he started a cancer rehabilitation program. He was followed-up as an outpatient and no longer complains of back pain. LESSONS RCC can manifest clinically as back pain, with diagnosis being difficult without appropriate imaging modalities. RCC should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with low back pain, even at a young age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ga Yang Shim
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min-Su Kim
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong Jun Kim
- Division of Medical Oncology-Hematology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yewan Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - So-Woon Kim
- Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myung Chul Yoo
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lai GS, Li JR, Wang SS, Chen CS, Yang CK, Lin CY, Hung SC, Chiu KY, Yang SF. Outcome benefits of upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: An analysis of the TriNetX database. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0299102. [PMID: 38547226 PMCID: PMC10977795 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy remains debatable in the present era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Here, we aimed to evaluate the outcomes of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with upfront CN and modern systemic therapies. METHODS Using the TriNetX network database, we identified patients, in the period from 2008 to 2022, who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, receiving first-line systemic therapies with tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Their overall survivals were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method as well as multivariable regressions. RESULTS We identified 11,094 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Of them, 2,914 (43%) patients in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor cohort (n = 6,779), and 1,884 (43.7%) in the immune checkpoint inhibitors cohort (n = 4315) underwent upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy. Those receiving upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy showed survival advantages with either tyrosine kinase inhibitor (Hazard ratio 0.722, 95% Confidence interval 0.67-0.73, p<0.001) or immune checkpoint inhibitors (Hazard ratio 65.1, 95% Confidence interval 0.59-0.71, p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy was a factor for improved OS in both cohorts: tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Hazard ratio 0.623, 95% Confidence interval 0.56-0.694, p<0.001) and immune checkpoint inhibitors cohort (Hazard ratio 0.688, 95% Confidence interval 0.607-0.779, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy was associated with an improved overall survival for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving either first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Our results support a clinical role of upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy in the modern era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gu-Shun Lai
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Tawan
| | - Jian-Ri Li
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Tawan
- Department of Medicine and Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Shian-Shiang Wang
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Tawan
- Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chi Nan University, Nantou, Taiwan
| | - Chuan-Shu Chen
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Tawan
| | - Chun-Kuang Yang
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Tawan
| | - Chia-Yen Lin
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Tawan
| | - Sheng-Chun Hung
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Tawan
| | - Kun-Yuan Chiu
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Tawan
- Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chi Nan University, Nantou, Taiwan
| | - Shun-Fa Yang
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Åkerla J, Helminen O, Väyrynen JP, Parkkinen A, Järvenpää H, Böhm J, Ahtiainen M, Seikkula H. CD3+ and CD8+ T cell-based immune cell score as a prognostic factor in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Acta Oncol 2024; 63:105-110. [PMID: 38578213 DOI: 10.2340/1651-226x.2024.19690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Immunoscore® is a prognostic parameter based on densities of lymphocyte populations in the tumor center and invasive margin. Immunoscore® is validated in colorectal cancer as a high Immunoscore® is associated with longer survival. Previous studies have suggested that Immunoscore® may also predict oncological outcomes in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). This study aims to assess the prognostic role of immune cell score in ccRCC. MATERIAL AND METHODS All patients with ccRCC undergoing surgery between 2007 and 2020 in Central Finland Central Hospital were retrospectively identified. CD3+ and CD8+ cell densities were calculated from tissue samples to determine the immune cell score using Immunoscore® principles. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival curve, and Cox regression were used to evaluate the association between immune cell score and survival. RESULTS A total of 203 patients (mean age 66.5 years) were identified. The median follow-up time was 6.2 years. Based on the immune cell score, the patients were divided into three groups: low, intermediate, and high. In Cox regression analysis, adjusted with age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, no significant differences in disease-specific mortality were observed among the three groups. The hazard ratios (HRs) for disease-specific mortality were 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-1.79) and 1.12 (0.52-2.37) for intermediate- and high-immune cell score groups when compared to low-immune cell score group, respectively. INTERPRETATION This study found no association between immune cell score and survival. These results indicate that immune cell score may not serve as a prognostic tool in ccRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonne Åkerla
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
| | - Olli Helminen
- Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Centre, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Juha P Väyrynen
- Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Centre, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Anne Parkkinen
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Nova of Central Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Hilma Järvenpää
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Nova of Central Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Jan Böhm
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Nova of Central Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Maarit Ahtiainen
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Nova of Central Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Heikki Seikkula
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Nova of Central Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Oh SW, Byun SS, Kim JK, Jeong CW, Kwak C, Hwang EC, Kang SH, Chung J, Kim YJ, Ha YS, Hong SH. Machine learning models for predicting the onset of chronic kidney disease after surgery in patients with renal cell carcinoma. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2024; 24:85. [PMID: 38519947 PMCID: PMC10960396 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02473-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have an elevated risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) following nephrectomy. Therefore, continuous monitoring and subsequent interventions are necessary. It is recommended to evaluate renal function postoperatively. Therefore, a tool to predict CKD onset is essential for postoperative follow-up and management. METHODS We constructed a cohort using data from eight tertiary hospitals from the Korean Renal Cell Carcinoma (KORCC) database. A dataset of 4389 patients with RCC was constructed for analysis from the collected data. Nine machine learning (ML) models were used to classify the occurrence and nonoccurrence of CKD after surgery. The final model was selected based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), and the importance of the variables constituting the model was confirmed using the shapley additive explanation (SHAP) value and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. RESULTS The gradient boost algorithm was the most effective among the various ML models tested. The gradient boost model demonstrated superior performance with an AUROC of 0.826. The SHAP value confirmed that preoperative eGFR, albumin level, and tumor size had a significant impact on the occurrence of CKD after surgery. CONCLUSIONS We developed a model to predict CKD onset after surgery in patients with RCC. This predictive model is a quantitative approach to evaluate post-surgical CKD risk in patients with RCC, facilitating improved prognosis through personalized postoperative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seol Whan Oh
- Department of Medical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 06591, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Biomedicine & Health Sciences, The Catholic University of Korea, 06591, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seok-Soo Byun
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 13620, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jung Kwon Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 13620, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Chang Wook Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 03080, Seoul, Korea
| | - Cheol Kwak
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 03080, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eu Chang Hwang
- Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, 61469, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Seok Ho Kang
- Department of Urology, Korea University School of Medicine, 02841, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jinsoo Chung
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center, 10408, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yong-June Kim
- Department of Urology, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, 28644, Cheongju, Korea
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, 28644, Cheongju, Korea
| | - Yun-Sok Ha
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Kyungpook National University, 41404, Daegu, Korea
| | - Sung-Hoo Hong
- Department of Urology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wei M, Yang W, Xu W, Liu G, Xie Y, Dong J, Ji Z. The role of antimicrobial prophylaxis in laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. BMC Urol 2024; 24:60. [PMID: 38481245 PMCID: PMC10935941 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01447-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the role of antimicrobial prophylaxis in laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. METHODS We retrospectively enrolled 1000 patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy from August 2019 to November 2021 in the Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Patients were divided into group without antimicrobial prophylaxis (n = 444) and group with antimicrobial prophylaxis (n = 556). Outcomes including 30-day postoperative infection rate, the increase rate of pre- and post-operative white blood cell counts and hospital stay were analyzed. RESULTS The overall infection rate was 5.0% (28/556) in the group with antimicrobial prophylaxis, which was similar to 4.1% (18/444) in the group without antimicrobial prophylaxis (P = 0.461). The increase rate of pre- and post-operative white blood cell counts was significantly lower (85.5% versus 97.0%) in the group with antimicrobial prophylaxis (P = 0.004). The postoperative hospital stay was 5 (4, 6) days in both groups (P = 0.483). Logistic regression analyses identified the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis had no influence on the occurrence of infection events (odds ratio = 0.797; 95% confidence interval, 0.435-1.460; P = 0.462). Hemoglobin (odds ratio = 0.430; 95% confidence interval, 0.257-0.719; P = 0.001) and partial nephrectomy (odds ratio = 2.292; 95% confidence interval, 1.724-3.046; P < 0.001) influenced the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis independently. CONCLUSIONS The use of antimicrobial prophylaxis had no impact on postoperative infection in patients receiving laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengchao Wei
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, 100000, China
| | - Wenjie Yang
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, 100000, China
| | - Weifeng Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, 100000, China
| | - Guanghua Liu
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, 100000, China
| | - Yi Xie
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, 100000, China
| | - Jie Dong
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, 100000, China
| | - Zhigang Ji
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing, 100000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Guo L, An T, Huang Z, Chong T. A network meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of adjuvant therapy after nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma. BMC Urol 2024; 24:55. [PMID: 38454397 PMCID: PMC10921661 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01441-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the past few years, there has been a continuous rise in the occurrence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), with RCC recurrence becoming the primary factor behind fatalities. Despite numerous clinical trials, the impact of different medications on the long-term survival of patients with RCC after surgery remains uncertain. This network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of various medications on the survival and safety of drugs in individuals with RCC following nephrectomy. METHODS We conducted a thorough search in various databases, including CNKI, WAN FANG DATA, VIP, Web of Science, Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), PubMed, Scopus, and Embase, for articles published prior to June 2, 2023. This meta-analysis incorporated randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RESULTS The analysis included 17 studies with 14,298 participants. The findings from the disease-free survival (DFS) analysis indicated that pembrolizumab demonstrated efficacy in enhancing DFS among patients with RCC following nephrectomy when compared to the placebo group (HR = 0.83, 95%CI 0.70 to 0.99). None of the drugs included in the study significantly improved overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after nephrectomy. For adverse events (AEs), sorafenib, pazopanib, sunitinib, and nivolumab plus ipilimumab interventions showed a higher incidence of adverse events compared with placebo. CONCLUSION The network meta-analysis yielded strong evidence indicating that pembrolizumab could potentially enhance DFS in patients with RCC following nephrectomy, surpassing the effectiveness of a placebo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingyu Guo
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 157 West Fifth Road, Xi'an, 710000, China
| | - Tian An
- Department of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China
| | - Zhixin Huang
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 157 West Fifth Road, Xi'an, 710000, China
| | - Tie Chong
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 157 West Fifth Road, Xi'an, 710000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mata M, Tabbara MM, Alvarez A, González J, Ciancio G. Renal cell carcinoma with an "uncoiling" tumor thrombus: intraoperative shift from level III to level IV. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22:76. [PMID: 38454471 PMCID: PMC10918875 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03355-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The gold standard treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with tumor thrombus (TT) is complete surgical excision. The surgery is complex and challenging to the surgeon, especially with large tumor thrombus extending into the inferior vena cava (IVC) and right atrium. Traditionally, these difficult cases required the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with or without deep hypothermic cardiac arrest, but in recent years, different surgical techniques derived from the field of liver transplantation have been used in efforts to avoid CPB. CASE PRESENTATION We present a case of RCC with TT level IIIc (extending above major hepatic veins) that "uncoiled" intraoperatively into the right atrium after division of the IVC ligament, transforming into a level IV TT. Despite the new TT extension, the surgery was successfully completed exclusively through an abdominal approach without CPB and while using intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) monitoring and a cardiothoracic team standby. CONCLUSIONS This case highlights the need for a multidisciplinary approach and the utility of intraoperative continous TEE monitoring which helped to visualize the change of the TT venous extension, allowing the surgical teamto modify their surgical approach as needed avoiding a catastrophic event.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Mata
- Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
- Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
- Unidad de Cirugia Renal, Trasplante e Investigación, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marina M Tabbara
- Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
- Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Angel Alvarez
- Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Javier González
- Servicio de Urología, Unidad de Trasplante Renal, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gaetano Ciancio
- Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA.
- Department of Surgery and Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1801 NW 9th Ave, 7th Floor, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ushijima Y, Okamoto D, Fujita N, Ishimatsu K, Wada N, Takao S, Murayama R, Itoyama M, Ishigami K. Effect of lipiodol marking before CT-guided cryoablation on the outcome of sporadic renal cell carcinoma. Diagn Interv Radiol 2024; 30:117-123. [PMID: 38164892 PMCID: PMC10916531 DOI: 10.4274/dir.2023.232381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This retrospective study evaluates the impact of preoperative lipiodol marking on the outcomes of computed tomography (CT)-guided cryoablation for histologically diagnosed sporadic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS This study analyzed the data of 173 patients who underwent CT-guided cryoablation for histologically proven sporadic RCC at a single institution between April 2014 and December 2020. The local control rate (LCR), recurrence-free survival rate (RFSR), overall survival rate (OSR), changes in renal function, and complications in patients with (n = 85) and without (n = 88) preoperative lipiodol marking were compared. RESULTS The 5-year LCR and 5-year RFSR were significantly higher in patients with lipiodol marking (97.51% and 93.84%, respectively) than in those without (72.38% and 68.10%, respectively) (P value <0.01, log-rank test). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the 5-year OSR (97.50% vs. 86.82%) or the deterioration in chronic kidney disease stage (12.70% vs. 16.43%). Grade ≥3 complications occurred in patients with lipiodol marking (n = 2, retroperitoneal hematoma and cerebral infarction in 1 patient each) and without (n = 5; urinary fistula in 2, colonic perforation in 2, urinary infection in 1). CONCLUSION Lipiodol marking before CT-guided cryoablation for sporadic RCC is a feasible approach to improving local control and RFS while mitigating the decline in renal function. Additionally, it may help reduce complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuhiro Ushijima
- Kyushu University, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Radiology, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Daisuke Okamoto
- Kyushu University, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Radiology, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Nobuhiro Fujita
- Kyushu University, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Radiology, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Keisuke Ishimatsu
- Kyushu University, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Radiology, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Noriaki Wada
- Kyushu University, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Radiology, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Seiichiro Takao
- Kyushu University, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Radiology, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Ryo Murayama
- Kyushu University, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Radiology, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masahiro Itoyama
- Kyushu University, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Radiology, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kousei Ishigami
- Kyushu University, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Radiology, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Sebastian W, Omar KO, Anees R, Nagaraju S, Chaitanya M. A Rare Case of Donor-Derived Renal Cell Carcinoma in a Kidney Transplant Recipient. Am J Case Rep 2024; 25:e941214. [PMID: 38442088 PMCID: PMC10926236 DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.941214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in transplanted kidneys is reported to be about 0.2%, which makes this case exceedingly rare. Risk factors include older age of the donors, smoking, obesity, and hypertension. Higher incidences of allograft RCC have been seen in patients who received a kidney from a deceased donor rather than from a living donor. CASE REPORT A 71-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease underwent deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) 1 year before presentation. The immune-suppressive regimen was Envarsus, Myfortic, and prednisone. Allograft functioned with a baseline creatinine of 1.4-1.5 mg/dL. The patient presented due to recurring UTIs, which prompted the ultrasound that showed a mass on the allograft. Abdominal MRI demonstrated a 3.5-cm mass in the upper pole. Biopsy showed clear-cell RCC, Fuhrman nuclear grade 3. The patient underwent a partial nephrectomy. Following the nephrectomy, baseline serum creatinine was 1.7-2 mg/dL. The patient was discharged with immunosuppressive therapy consisting of Myfortic, prednisone, and Rapamune after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS There are no standard treatment guidelines or optimal immune therapy for the management of allograft RCC in renal transplant recipients. Options include radical nephrectomy, nephron-sparing surgery (NSS), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and active surveillance. According to a systematic review, the recurrence of cancer after partial nephrectomy was 3.6% after 3.1 years, which was similar to non-transplanted kidneys. There is not enough evidence to support screening for RCC in patients with transplanted kidneys, but constitutional symptoms like recurrent UTIs should prompt further investigation for potential malignancies in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Sebastian
- Medical Student, West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lewisburg, WV, USA
| | - Khawaja O. Omar
- Department of Pulmonary Critical Care, Charleston Area Medical Center (CAMC), Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Rabia Anees
- Department of Internal Medicine, Charleston Area Medical Center (CAMC), Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Santosh Nagaraju
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center (CAMC), Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Mishra Chaitanya
- Department of Pulmonary Critical Care, Charleston Area Medical Center (CAMC), Charleston, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Song S, Lou K, Lun J, Cui Y. The high expression of TOP2A indicates poor prognosis and is associated with immune infiltration in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma. Asian J Surg 2024; 47:1493-1494. [PMID: 38065734 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.11.146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shizhang Song
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, China
| | - Keyuan Lou
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, China
| | - Jia Lun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, China.
| | - Yuanshan Cui
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, China.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Toribio-Vázquez C, Martinez-Piñeiro L. Re: Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo as Post-nephrectomy Adjuvant Therapy for Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (KEYNOTE-564): 30-month Follow-up Analysis of a Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Trial. Eur Urol 2024; 85:306. [PMID: 37957046 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Toribio-Vázquez
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Croghan SM, Voborsky M, Roche AF, Condron C, O'Keeffe DA, McGuire BB. Design and utilisation of a novel, high-fidelity, low-cost, hybrid-tissue simulation model to facilitate training in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:103. [PMID: 38427102 PMCID: PMC10907476 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01857-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has rapidly evolved as the standard of care for appropriately selected renal tumours, offering key patient benefits over radical nephrectomy or open surgical approaches. Accordingly, RAPN is a key competency that urology trainees wishing to treat kidney cancer must master. Training in robotic surgery is subject to numerous challenges, and simulation has been established as valuable step in the robotic learning curve. However, simulation models are often both expensive and suboptimal in fidelity. This means that the number of practice repetitions for a trainee may limited by cost restraints, and that trainees may struggle to reconcile the skills obtained in the simulation laboratory with real-world practice in the operating room. We have developed a high-fidelity, low-cost, customizable model for RAPN simulation based on porcine tissue. The model has been utilised in teaching courses at our institution, confirming both feasibility of use and high user acceptability. We share the design of our model in this proof-of-concept report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie M Croghan
- Department of Urology and Transplantation, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
- Strategic Academic Recruitment Programme, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Miroslav Voborsky
- RCSI SIM Centre for Simulation Education and Research, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Adam F Roche
- RCSI SIM Centre for Simulation Education and Research, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Claire Condron
- RCSI SIM Centre for Simulation Education and Research, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Dara A O'Keeffe
- RCSI SIM Centre for Simulation Education and Research, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Barry B McGuire
- RCSI SIM Centre for Simulation Education and Research, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Urology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Fan X, Fu F, Liang R, Xue E, Zhang H, Zhu Y, Ye Q. Associations between contrast-enhanced ultrasound features and WHO/ISUP grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study. Int Urol Nephrol 2024; 56:1157-1164. [PMID: 37670195 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03774-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) comprises 70%-80% of RCCs. The World Health Organization/International Society of Urology Pathology (WHO/ISUP) classification is the most important prognostic factor for CCRCC. By evaluating the variations of tumor microvascular density, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can noninvasively predict the WHO/ISUP grade of CCRCC, and provide the appropriate treatment plan before clinical operation. METHODS In this study, we used CEUS features to analyze 116 CCRCC cases and assess the value of correlation between each indicator and CCRCC WHO/ISUP grading. RESULTS When compared to high-grade (WHO/ISUP grade III/IV) tumors, low-grade (WHO/ISUP grade I/II) tumors had reduced relative peak intensity (ΔPI) (P = 0.021), relative area under the curve (ΔAUC) (P = 0.019). However, the frequency of incomplete pseudocapsule (P = 0.021) was significantly higher in high-grade tumors. A cut-off value of mean diameter > 5.5 cm, ΔPI > 304 × 10-3, ΔAUC > 350 × 10-3 allowed identification of high-grade tumors with an area under the curve (AUC) of 74.6%, 71.7%, 70.7%, respectively (95% confidence interval). CONCLUSIONS The features of CEUS are effective for differentiating high-grade tumors from low-grade tumors, thus CEUS can be considered an acceptable method for the preoperative assessment of tumor grade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoqing Fan
- Department of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China
| | - Fen Fu
- Department of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China
| | - Rongxi Liang
- Department of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China
| | - Ensheng Xue
- Department of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China
| | - Huiping Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yifan Zhu
- Department of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China
| | - Qin Ye
- Department of Ultrasound, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Faegh A, Moeinafshar A, Rezaei N. Nephrectomy and IVC thrombectomy in renal cancer: a narrative review. Clin Transl Oncol 2024; 26:574-583. [PMID: 37568007 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03302-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023]
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma accounts for two to three percent of adult malignancies and can lead to inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombosis. This condition can decrease the rate of 5-year survival for patients to 60%. The treatment of choice in such cases is radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava thrombectomy. This surgery is one of the most challenging due to many perioperative complications. There are many controversial methods reported in the literature. Achieving the free of tumor IVC wall and the possibility of thrombectomy in cases of level III and level IV IVC thrombosis are two essential matters previously advocated open approaches. Nevertheless, open approaches are being replaced by minimally invasive techniques despite the difficulty of the surgical management of IVC thrombectomy. This paper aims to review recent evidence about new surgical methods and a comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches. In this review, we present the latest surgical strategies for IVC thrombectomy and compare open and minimally invasive approaches to achieve the optimal surgical technique. Due to the different anatomy of the left and right kidneys and variable extension of venous thrombosis, we investigate surgical methods for left and right kidney cancer and each level of IVC venous thrombosis separately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Faegh
- School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
| | - Aysan Moeinafshar
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nima Rezaei
- Network of Immunity in Infection, Malignancy, and Autoimmunity (NIIMA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran.
- Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
- Children's Medical Center Hospital, Dr. Qarib St, Keshavarz Blvd, Tehran, 14194, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Takagi T, Omae K, Yoshida K, Fukuda H, Kobari Y, Ishihara H, Iizuka J, Kondo T, Ishida H. Comparisons of survival and surgical outcomes between minimally invasive partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy in elderly patients with stage 1 renal cell carcinoma. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24:269-274. [PMID: 38246656 DOI: 10.1111/ggi.14808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
AIM We compared survival and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) for older patients (age 70 years or older) with stage 1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS This retrospective, single-center study included 260 patients who underwent RAPN and 44 patients who underwent LRN. The overall survival (OS) and perioperative outcomes were compared between these two groups using an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis. RESULTS Compared with the LRN group, a trend of more complications was observed in the RAPN group, including a higher body mass index (24 vs. 22 kg/m2 ; P = 0.0002) and higher rates of hypertension (77% vs. 55%; P = 0.0029) and chronic kidney disease (62% vs. 36%; P = 0.0027). After adjustment by the IPTW analysis, the RAPN group had a shorter operative time (143 vs. 282 min; P = 0.033), shorter postoperative length of hospital stay (PLOS) (4.1 vs. 7.9 days; P = 0.004), and less change in the estimated glomerular filtration rate during surgery (-8.4% vs. -32%; P < 0.0001) than the LRN group; however, the perioperative complication rates were similar. Patients who underwent RAPN had better 5-year OS than those who underwent LRN (95% vs. 90%; log-rank, P = 0.017). CONCLUSION RAPN resulted in better OS and surgical outcomes, with shorter operative time, shorter PLOS, and better renal function preservation, than LRN for older patients with stage 1 RCC. Therefore, RAPN may be the primary option for patients indicated for surgical intervention. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 269-274.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshio Takagi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenji Omae
- Department of Innovative Research and Education for Clinicians and Trainees (DiRECT), Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Yoshida
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hironori Fukuda
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Kobari
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Ishihara
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junpei Iizuka
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsunenori Kondo
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Adachi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideki Ishida
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Riemenschneider KA, Farooqui W, Penninga L, Storkholm JH, Hansen CP. The results of surgery for renal cell carcinoma metastases of the pancreas. Scand J Gastroenterol 2024; 59:354-360. [PMID: 38042983 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2286911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are rare. This study evaluated the surgical pathology and outcomes after resection of RCC metastases to the pancreas. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective review of from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2021, of patients who underwent pancreatic surgery for metastases from RCC. Data were retrieved from a prospectively managed database and patient demographics, comorbidities, pathology, perioperative outcomes, and overall survival were analyzed. Median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS There were 25 patients (17 males, 8 females, median age 66 range 51 - 79 year), all with metachronous metastases. Median time from resection of the primary to operation for pancreatic RCC was 95.6 (12.0 - 309.7) months. Twenty-four patients were operated with intended cure (four pancreaticoduodenectomies, three total pancreatectomies, 17 distal pancreatectomies) and one patient had abortive surgery due to dissemination. Postoperative surgical complications occurred in nine patients (36%), and one patient died during hospital stay. Eight patients (33.3%) developed exocrine and/or endocrine insufficiency after pancreatic resection. Fifteen patients (60%) had recurrence 21.7 (4.9 - 61.6) months after pancreatic operation. Five patients (25%) died from RCC during follow-up 46.3 (25.6 - 134.8) months after pancreatic resection. Five-year OS and DFS were83.6% and 32.3%, respectively. Median OS after pancreatic surgery was 134.8 months, independent of resection of previous extrapancreatic metastases. CONCLUSIONS Pancreatic resection for metastases from RCC offers favorable prognosis with a curative potential and should be considered a valuable treatment option even in the era of novel targeted treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Waqas Farooqui
- Department of Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Luit Penninga
- Department of Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jan Henrik Storkholm
- Department of Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Carsten Palnæs Hansen
- Department of Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Pathak N, Ganpule A, Patel D, Singh A, Shete N, Sabnis R, Desai M. Outcomes and predictors of clinical T1 renal mass (cT1) upstaged to pathological T3a (pT3a) after partial nephrectomy: A single-center experience. Int J Urol 2024; 31:252-257. [PMID: 38124339 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clinical T1 (cT1) renal mass treated surgically has a good prognosis, but there is an upstaging risk that potentially threatens oncological outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN). We aim to analyze and study the incidence, predictors, perioperative morbidity, and oncological outcomes of pT3a upstaging. METHODOLOGY A retrospective study of 313 patients who underwent PN for cT1 renal mass at a single center from a single tertiary referral center between 2000 and 2021 was done. Demographic, perioperative, pathological, and outcome variables were reviewed. We compared these parameters between upstaged and non-upstaged groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to study preoperative variables associated with upstaging. RESULTS Nineteen patients were upstaged to pT3a. Making an incidence of 6.1%. Upstaged tumors were bigger (5.02 cm vs. 4.08 cm, p = 0.004), had higher clinical stage T1b (84.2 vs. 40.5%, p < 0.001), had more tumors which were central location (21 vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001), had more endophytic and mesophytic tumors (15.8 vs. 5.8% and 52.6 vs. 9.5%, p < 0.001), and had higher R.E.N.A.L Nephrometry score (8.05 vs. 6, p < 0.001). Upstaged tumors had more operative times (227 vs. 203 min, p = 0.01), more postoperative complications (68.4 vs. 13.1%, p < 0.001), more major complications of Clavien Dindo Grade 3 and above (15.8 vs. 4.4%, p < 0.001). Age (OR 1.035, p = 0.034), Radiological tumor dimension (OR 1.578, p = 0.003), Radiological or Clinical stage (T1b) (9.19, p = 0.008), Higher Nephrometry score (Intermediate and High) (OR 6.184, p = 0.004) were preoperative predictors of upstaging. Oncological outcomes were comparable. CONCLUSION Tumor upstaging was uncommon with more perioperative morbidity. Higher age, larger tumor size, higher tumor stage, and higher nephrometry scores were preoperative predictors of upstaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niramya Pathak
- Urology Department, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| | - Arvind Ganpule
- Urology Department, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| | - Dhruv Patel
- Urology Department, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| | - Abhishek Singh
- Urology Department, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| | - Nitiraj Shete
- Urology Department, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| | - Ravindra Sabnis
- Urology Department, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| | - Mahesh Desai
- Urology Department, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Zhu H, Huang R, Zhang G. Eosinophilic cystic and solid renal cell carcinoma: A case report. Asian J Surg 2024; 47:1639-1640. [PMID: 38155079 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.12.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hezhen Zhu
- First Clinical College, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China
| | - Ruohui Huang
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China
| | - Guoxi Zhang
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Gutiérrez Rojas AF, Fernández D, Diaz Ritter C. Re: Robert J. Motzer, Pratik P. Rane, Todd L. Saretsky, et al. Patient-reported Outcome Measurement and Reporting for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review. Eur Urol. Eur Urol. 2023;84:406-17. Eur Urol 2024; 85:e94. [PMID: 37802682 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.08.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Cesar Diaz Ritter
- Department of Urology. Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|