Rivastigmine: in Parkinson's disease dementia

Rivastigmine is a carbamate-type dual inhibitor of brain acetyl- and butyrylcholinesterases that has been evaluated in the symptomatic treatment of patients with mild to moderate dementia associated with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Oral rivastigmine 3-12 mg/day for 24 weeks was significantly more effective than placebo in ameliorating cognitive and functional decline, including attentional deficits, in patients with Parkinson's disease dementia in a randomised, double-blind trial. The beneficial effects of rivastigmine observed in the double-blind trial were generally maintained in a 24-week extension of this study in which all patients received active treatment; placebo recipients who switched to rivastigmine also experienced improvements in their cognitive and functional symptoms at week 48. Rivastigmine appeared to be generally well tolerated, with the most common adverse events being mild to moderate in intensity and cholinergic in nature. Parkinsonian symptoms (mainly tremor) were more common in rivastigmine than placebo recipients.

Ultra-short-course seasonal allergy vaccine (Pollinex Quattro)

This novel ultra-short-course seasonal allergy vaccine, containing glutaraldehyde-modified allergens and the adjuvants 3-deacylated monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) and L-tyrosine, requires a preseasonal course of only four injections to be effective in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. In patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and/or allergic asthma, a four-injection vaccination course with either the grass pollen or tree pollen allergy vaccine significantly reduced skin prick sensitivity reactions, significantly elevated allergen-specific IgG levels and significantly reduced the seasonally induced boost of IgE. Preseasonal vaccination of adult patients with either grass pollen or tree pollen allergy vaccine significantly reduced the median combined symptom/medication score compared with placebo. Similarly, preseasonal vaccination of children and adolescents with allergies to grass pollen or tree pollen significantly reduced the global symptom and medication use scores compared with the previous pollen season. Postmarketing surveillance indicated that after a course of vaccination, 82% of patients experienced reduced symptoms and 62% reduced their rescue medication use compared with the previous season. The allergy vaccine was generally well tolerated. Local reactions, mainly injection-site redness and swelling, were more common than systemic reactions. There were no serious adverse events.

Spotlight on mammalian cell-derived somatropin in HIV-associated wasting

HIV-associated wasting, characterized by progressive loss of lean body mass and bodyweight, remains a significant problem in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Loss of body cell mass, a component of lean body mass, is associated with decreased survival. Somatropin (recombinant human growth hormone) derived from mammalian cells (Serostim) is the only US FDA-approved treatment indicated to increase lean body mass, bodyweight, and physical endurance in HIV-associated wasting. Somatropin 0.1 mg/kg/day administered subcutaneously for 12 weeks effectively increased work output, bodyweight, and lean body mass, and improved health-related quality of life, compared with placebo, and had a generally manageable tolerability profile in a large randomized study in patients with HIV-associated wasting. Potential areas for further research include determination of longer-term efficacy and tolerability, the cost effectiveness of treatment, the optimal somatropin dosage, management of patients after 12 weeks' therapy, and whether maintenance strategies might exist to maintain accrued lean body mass with lower doses of somatropin. Nevertheless, indications to date are that somatropin is likely to have an important role in the treatment of patients with HIV-associated wasting.

Mammalian cell-derived somatropin : a review of its use in the management of HIV-associated wasting

HIV-associated wasting, characterised by progressive loss of lean body mass and bodyweight, remains a significant problem in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Loss of body cell mass, a component of lean body mass, is associated with decreased survival. Somatropin (recombinant human growth hormone) derived from mammalian cells (Serostim) is the only US FDA-approved treatment indicated to increase lean body mass, bodyweight and physical endurance in HIV-associated wasting. Somatropin 0.1 mg/kg/day administered subcutaneously for 12 weeks effectively increased work output, bodyweight and lean body mass and improved health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), compared with placebo, and had a generally manageable tolerability profile in a large randomised study in patients with HIV-associated wasting. Potential areas for further research include determination of longer-term efficacy and tolerability, the cost effectiveness of treatment, the optimal somatropin dosage, management of patients after 12 weeks' therapy and whether maintenance strategies might exist to maintain accrued lean body mass with lower doses of somatropin. Nevertheless, indications to date are that somatropin is likely to have an important role in the treatment of patients with HIV-associated wasting.

Anagrelide: a review of its use in the management of essential thrombocythaemia

Anagrelide (Agrylin, Xagrid) is an oral imidazoquinazoline agent which is indicated in Europe for the reduction of elevated platelet counts in at-risk patients with essential thrombocythaemia who are intolerant of or refractory to their current therapy, and in the US for the reduction of elevated platelet counts and the amelioration of thrombohaemorrhagic events in patients with thrombocythaemia associated with myeloproliferative disorders. Anagrelide is well established as an effective platelet-lowering agent in most patients with essential thrombocythaemia, including both treatment-naive patients and those refractory to other cytoreductive therapy. Results of the only randomised trial to date (the Primary Thrombocythaemia 1 [PT1] study) indicated that the composite primary endpoint (arterial or venous thrombosis, serious haemorrhage or death from vascular causes) occurred more often in recipients of anagrelide plus aspirin than in those receiving hydroxycarbamide (hydroxyurea) plus aspirin. This trial also indicated that the incidence of the secondary endpoints transient ischaemic attack and gastrointestinal bleeding favoured hydroxycarbamide plus aspirin, while the incidence of venous thrombosis favoured anagrelide plus aspirin. There were no differences between the groups in the incidence of secondary endpoints myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina, pulmonary embolism, hepatic-vein thrombosis, other serious haemorrhage or related deaths. The design of the PT1 study has been queried with respect to the heterogeneous nature of the study population (possible inclusion of patients with early myelofibrotic disease) and the concomitant use of aspirin (interaction with anagrelide causing increased bleeding events). Further data are therefore required before the role of anagrelide in essential thrombocythaemia can be finalized. In the meantime, when considering treatment options for patients with this disorder, anagrelide's positive effects on platelet function, lack of mutagenicity and lack of association with leukaemia or angiogenesis must be balanced against its comparative expense and positive inotropic effects. Thus, the role of anagrelide in the management of high-risk patients with essential thrombocythaemia will ultimately depend on individual patient assessment and future clarification of the potential leukaemogenicity of hydroxycarbamide.

Spotlight on etanercept in plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

Etanercept (Enbrel), a tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antagonist produced by recombinant technology, is approved for use in the US as subcutaneous monotherapy in adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy. The drug is also indicated in patients with psoriatic arthritis, in whom it may be used in combination with methotrexate. In well designed trials in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, short-term etanercept therapy (typically 25 or 50mg twice weekly) significantly increased the proportion of patients achieving a 75% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score compared with placebo. Similarly, in well designed trials in patients with psoriatic arthritis, treatment with short-term etanercept 25mg twice weekly, alone or in combination with methotrexate, improved clinical features of the disease, while radiographic progression of joint damage appeared to be significantly slowed in a nonblind 1-year extension. Short-term etanercept therapy was well tolerated in patients with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis. Etanercept is thus a valuable new option for the treatment of patients with chronic moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy or have failed other systemic therapies) or with psoriatic arthritis.

Nebivolol

Nebivolol is a third-generation beta-adrenoceptor antagonist. It differs from other beta-adrenoceptor antagonists as it combines highly selective beta(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist properties with nitric oxide-mediated vasodilatory actions and beneficial effects on endothelial function. Nebivolol is approved in Europe and several other countries for the treatment of essential hypertension and in Europe for the treatment of stable mild or moderate chronic heart failure (CHF) in addition to standard therapies in elderly patients aged >or=70 years. Nebivolol is an effective antihypertensive agent and is well tolerated in patients with hypertension. The drug also effectively decreased the composite endpoint of mortality and cardiovascular hospital admission in elderly patients with CHF and was generally well tolerated in this population. Nebivolol should be considered as an alternative first-line treatment option for patients with uncomplicated mild to moderate essential hypertension and in elderly patients with CHF.

Fentanyl Buccal Tablet

The fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) is a new formulation of fentanyl that uses an effervescent drug delivery system to enhance penetration across the buccal mucosa for the treatment of breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant patients with cancer. Fentanyl is rapidly absorbed from FBT across the buccal mucosa and into the bloodstream. Fentanyl is more rapidly absorbed and bioavailability is higher from FBT than from the oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate formulation. In a well designed phase III trial in opioid-tolerant patients with cancer, a single dose of FBT 100-800 microg provided clinically significant improvements in pain intensity from 15 to 60 minutes after the dose. Single FBT doses of 100-800 microg were generally well tolerated; the majority of adverse events were mild to moderate in nature and typical of those associated with opioids.

Valsartan/Hydrochlorothiazide

Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide is a fixed-dose (valsartan 80, 160 or 320mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 or 25mg) angiotensin II receptor blocker/diuretic drug combination indicated for the treatment of patients with essential hypertension not adequately controlled by monotherapy.There is ample evidence that valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide is an effective fixed-dose combination antihypertensive agent. However, efficacy and tolerability data pertaining to the 320mg dose of valsartan in the combination are currently relatively few. There is also some evidence of potential benefits associated with the relatively favourable tolerability profile of the combination, the low occurrence of new-onset diabetes mellitus versus amlodipine and the valsartan-associated improvements in cardiac and endothelial function.

Intranasal sumatriptan: in adolescents with migraine

Sumatriptan, a serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) agonist, constricts cranial blood vessels and inhibits neuroinflammatory processes. A single dose of sumatriptan 10 mg (approved European dosage) was significantly more effective than placebo in achieving headache relief at 1 hour post-dose in a well designed study. Headache relief occurred in significantly more adolescents administered a single dose of intranasal sumatriptan 20 mg (at 1 and 2 hours) and 5 mg (at 2 hours) than placebo (pooled data from two studies). Sustained headache relief (1-24 and 2-24 hours) occurred in significantly more recipients of a single dose of intranasal sumatriptan 20mg and 5mg than placebo (pooled data from two studies). Intranasal sumatriptan was generally well tolerated in adolescent migraineurs (in single-episode studies or long term in multiple-episode studies). Taste disturbance occurred more often with intranasal sumatriptan than with placebo [Chart: see text].

Etanercept: a review of its use in the management of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

Etanercept (Enbrel), a tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonist produced by recombinant technology, is approved for use in the US as subcutaneous monotherapy in adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy. The drug is also indicated in patients with psoriatic arthritis, in whom it may be used in combination with methotrexate. In well designed trials in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, short-term etanercept therapy (typically 25 or 50 mg twice weekly) significantly increased the proportion of patients achieving a 75% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score compared with placebo. Similarly, in well designed trials in patients with psoriatic arthritis, treatment with short-term etanercept 25 mg twice weekly, alone or in combination with methotrexate, improved clinical features of the disease, while radiographic progression of joint damage appeared to be significantly slowed in a nonblind 1-year extension. Short-term etanercept therapy was well tolerated in patients with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis. Etanercept is thus a valuable new option for the treatment of patients with chronic moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy or have failed other systemic therapies) or with psoriatic arthritis.

Spotlight on rosiglitazone in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Rosiglitazone, a thiazolidinedione with a different side chain from those of troglitazone and pioglitazone, reduces plasma glucose levels and glucose production and increases glucose clearance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Insulin sensitivity, pancreatic beta-cell function and surrogate markers of cardiovascular risk factors are significantly improved by rosiglitazone. Double-blind trials of 8 to 26 weeks of rosiglitazone 4 or 8 mg/day monotherapy indicate significant decreases in fasting plasma glucose (-2 to -3 mmol/L with 8 mg/day) and glycosylated hemoglobin levels [HbA(1c); -0.6 to -0.7% (-0.8 to -1.1% in drug-naive patients) with 8 mg/day]. Significant decreases in hyperglycemic markers occurred when rosiglitazone was combined with metformin (HbA(1c) -0.8 to -1.0%), a sulfonylurea (-1.4%) or insulin (-1.2%) for 26 weeks versus little change with active comparator monotherapy. Efficacy was maintained in trials of < or =2 years, and was also apparent in various ethnic subgroups, elderly patients and both obese and nonobese patients. Rosiglitazone is currently not indicated in combination with injected insulin. It should be administered in conjunction with diet and exercise regimens. Rosiglitazone is generally well tolerated. Despite rare individual reports of liver function abnormalities in rosiglitazone recipients, the incidence of these in clinical trials (< or =2 years' duration) was similar to that in placebo and active comparator groups. Fluid retention associated with rosiglitazone may be the cause of the increased incidence of anemia in clinical trials, and also means that patients should be monitored for signs of heart failure during therapy. Although bodyweight is increased overall with rosiglitazone therapy, increases are in subcutaneous, not visceral, fat; hepatic fat is decreased. The pharmacokinetic profile of rosiglitazone is not substantially altered by age or renal impairment, nor are there important drug interactions. Rosiglitazone is not indicated in patients with active liver disease or increased liver enzymes.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral rosiglitazone 4 or 8 mg/day provides significant antihyperglycemic efficacy and is generally well tolerated, both as monotherapy and in combination with other antihyperglycemic agents, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who do not have active liver disease. Long-term data are required before conclusions can be drawn about the clinical significance of positive changes to surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease risk and improvements to pancreatic beta-cell function. Rosiglitazone significantly improves insulin sensitivity and, as such, is a welcome addition to the treatment options for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Intramuscular olanzapine: a review of its use in the management of acute agitation

Intramuscular olanzapine (Zyprexa) is a rapid-acting atypical antipsychotic drug that is also indicated for use in patients with agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar mania, the focus of this review. Evidence from three well designed trials indicates that this formulation of olanzapine is at least as effective as intramuscular haloperidol or lorazepam in the treatment of patients with acute agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar mania, and has a faster onset of action. Although transient reductions in blood pressure and heart rate may occur in some patients administered intramuscular olanzapine, preliminary evidence of a general lack of clinical effect on the corrected QT (QTc) interval and a low incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) is promising. The parenteral formulation of olanzapine appears to offer an effective, fast-acting and generally well tolerated alternative in the treatment of this significant behavioural problem.

Goserelin

Goserelin (Zoladex), a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue, reduces plasma/serum estrogen levels in pre- or perimenopausal women (to postmenopausal levels), and is indicated in hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer in this population group. Adjuvant goserelin monotherapy has similar efficacy to adjuvant chemotherapy in pre- or perimenopausal women with early, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Furthermore, the addition of goserelin to adjuvant chemotherapy appeared to offer an advantage over chemotherapy alone in younger patients. Fewer patients remained amenorrheic after goserelin therapy than after chemotherapy. Complete endocrine blockade provided by the addition of tamoxifen to therapy including goserelin appears to improve outcomes. Thus, goserelin offers a valuable addition to the currently available options for treating pre- or perimenopausal women with hormone therapy-responsive early breast cancer, particularly for women wishing to regain ovarian function after treatment.

Enoxaparin

Enoxaparin (Clexane), Lovenox) is a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) that has been widely used in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in surgical patients. More recently, with the recognition of the high incidence of VTE in acutely ill medical (nonsurgical) patients, enoxaparin has been evaluated for thromboprophylaxis in this patient population. Subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg once daily has shown efficacy in the short-term thromboprophylaxis of VTE in nonsurgical patients with severely restricted mobility due to acute illness in well controlled clinical trials. The drug is at least similar in efficacy to unfractionated heparin (UFH) and its pharmacological profile allows once-daily administration, in contrast to the twice- or three-times-daily administration required with UFH. The tolerability profile of enoxaparin is also similar to that of UFH, except that the incidences of local haematomas and increased liver enzymes are lower with enoxaparin. The optimal duration of prophylaxis in nonsurgical patients is currently being evaluated and the results of extended prophylaxis with enoxaparin evaluated in the EXCLAIM (EXtended CLinical prophylaxis in Acutely Ill Medical patients) trial are awaited with interest. Currently, short-term enoxaparin appears to provide a cost-effective treatment alternative to UFH for VTE prophylaxis in nonsurgical patients.

Losartan

Losartan (Cozaar) is an angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist. It is approved in numerous countries for the treatment of hypertension and has been approved in the UK, the US and several European countries for stroke risk reduction in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Losartan is recommended for use alone or with hydrochlorothiazide, but it can also be administered with other antihypertensive medications. In patients with hypertension, losartan effectively lowers blood pressure and also leads to regression of LVH. In the large, well designed LIFE (Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension) study in patients with hypertension and LVH, losartan was more effective than atenolol in reducing the composite primary endpoint of cardiovascular (CV) mortality, stroke or myocardial infarction (MI). This was mainly due to a significant 25% reduction in the risk of stroke in the losartan group. Losartan recipients also had a significantly lower incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus compared with atenolol recipients. Similar benefits were observed in several patient subgroups from the LIFE study, but not in the subgroup of Black patients. Losartan is well tolerated and is a cost effective alternative to atenolol in the setting of stroke reduction. Comparative data on clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients for losartan versus other antihypertensive agents would be of interest. Nonetheless, in addition to its established antihypertensive and end organ effects, the LIFE study indicates that, with the possible exception of Black patients, losartan can reduce the risk of stroke in patients with hypertension and LVH.

Solifenacin in Overactive Bladder Syndrome

Solifenacin is a bladder-selective, muscarinic (M(1) and M(3)) receptor antagonist. In animal studies, the selectivity of solifenacin for the bladder over the salivary glands was greater than that of tolterodine, oxybutynin, darifenacin or atropine. In large, 12-week, randomised, double-blind, multicentre clinical trials, solifenacin 5 and 10mg once daily improved symptoms of overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) [urinary urgency, frequency, incontinence and nocturia] and increased functional bladder capacity to a significantly greater extent than placebo. Solifenacin 5 or 10mg once daily was noninferior to tolterodine extended release (ER) 4mg daily for improving urinary frequency and had significantly greater efficacy than tolterodine ER for improving other symptoms of OAB (episodes of urgency, incontinence and urge incontinence) and increasing functional bladder capacity. At least half of all patients receiving solifenacin who were incontinent at baseline were continent by study end in the three comparative studies reporting this parameter. Health-related quality of life was significantly improved with once-daily solifenacin 5 or 10mg versus placebo, as assessed in two 12-week double-blind studies; the improvement was maintained during a 40-week extension study. Solifenacin was generally well tolerated; the most frequently reported adverse events were dry mouth, constipation and blurred vision.

Trandolapril/Verapamil Sustained Release

Trandolapril/verapamil sustained release (SR) [Tarka] is an oral, fixed-dose combination of the ACE inhibitor trandolapril and the SR formulation of the phenylalkylamine calcium channel antagonist verapamil. It is indicated for the treatment of hypertension in patients who require more than one agent to achieve blood pressure (BP) targets. In the large, randomised, multicentre INVEST (INternational VErapamil SR/trandolapril STudy), a verapamil SR-based treatment strategy that included trandolapril in most patients was as effective as an atenolol-based treatment strategy in reducing the risk of the primary outcome (first occurrence of death [all-cause], nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI] or nonfatal stroke) in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease (CAD) and was as well tolerated. Trandolapril/verapamil SR is generally more effective at controlling hypertension than either component as monotherapy, and is as effective as a number of other fixed-dose combination therapies. The combination is as well tolerated as trandolapril monotherapy and is at least as well tolerated as verapamil SR monotherapy. In hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the BENEDICT (BErgamo NEphrologic DIabetes Complications Trial), trandolapril/verapamil SR prolonged the time to the onset of persistent microalbuminuria compared with placebo, as did trandolapril monotherapy. Thus, trandolapril/verapamil SR is an effective option for the treatment of essential hypertension in patients requiring more than one agent to achieve BP targets, including those with compelling indications, such as CAD or type 2 diabetes.

Inhaled iloprost: in primary pulmonary hypertension

Iloprost is a stable prostacyclin analogue with a pharmacokinetic profile allowing nebulised administration in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH). Inhaled iloprost is a potent acute pulmonary vasodilator with a duration of action of about 60 minutes. It may exert additional long-term benefit through antiproliferative and antithrombotic effects. Inhaled iloprost 2.5 or 5 microg six or nine times daily for 12 weeks (n = 101) significantly (p < 0.01) improved a combined clinical endpoint of a > or =10% increase in distance walked in 6 minutes and an improvement of > or =1 class in New York Heart Association functional class without clinical deterioration or death (16.8 versus 4.9% of placebo recipients, n = 102) in patients with severe PPH or selected forms of nonprimary pulmonary hypertension. Statistical analysis of the response for the PPH subgroup (20.8 versus 5.5% with placebo; n = 51 and 51) was not reported. Improvements from baseline in exercise capacity and haemodynamic/gas exchange variables have been reported in patients with PPH with continued use of inhaled iloprost. In addition, improvement in preinhalation vascular resistance occurred after 12 weeks of inhaled iloprost (p < 0.01 versus placebo) in a large randomised trial. Increased cough, headache, flushing and an influenza-like syndrome were the most common adverse events in the largest trial of patients receiving inhaled iloprost. Headache, flushing and jaw pain occurred significantly more frequently with inhaled iloprost than with placebo.

Levosimendan: a review of its use in the management of acute decompensated heart failure

Levosimendan (Simdax) is a calcium-sensitising drug that stabilises the troponin molecule in cardiac muscle, thus prolonging its effects on contractile proteins, with concomitant vasodilating properties. Intravenous levosimendan (12-24 microg/kg loading dose followed by 0.1-0.2 microg/kg/min for 24 hours, adjusted for response and tolerability) is approved for the short-term treatment of acute severe decompensated heart failure. Cardiac output increased by about 30% and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and systemic vascular resistance decreased by about 17-29% in patients with decompensated heart failure receiving intravenous levosimendan. In large, well controlled trials in patients with decompensated heart failure, intravenous levosimendan was significantly more effective than placebo or dobutamine for overall haemodynamic response rate (primary endpoint). Significant benefits were also seen for mortality (versus placebo or dobutamine) and for the combined risk of worsening heart failure or death (versus dobutamine). Improvements in key symptoms (dyspnoea and fatigue) have not been consistently demonstrated. Hospitalisation costs were similar for levosimendan and dobutamine; the total incremental (hospitalisation plus drug) cost per life-year saved (extrapolated to 3 years) for levosimendan relative to dobutamine was estimated at Euro 3205 (year of costing 2000). Levosimendan is generally well tolerated, with an adverse event profile at recommended dosages similar to that in patients receiving placebo. Cardiac rate/rhythm disorders and headache were the most common events. At higher dosages, patients receiving levosimendan had higher rates of sinus tachycardia than those in placebo recipients. More patients receiving dobutamine than those receiving levosimendan experienced angina pectoris/chest pain/myocardial ischaemia or rate/rhythm disorders.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous levosimendan is an effective calcium-sensitising drug with vasodilatory and inotropic effects, and superior efficacy/tolerability to those of intravenous dobutamine in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. It may be associated with reduced mortality compared with both placebo and dobutamine. Levosimendan is generally well tolerated and may have less potential for cardiac rate/rhythm disorders than dobutamine. While evidence from well designed trials confirming the improved mortality over dobutamine and investigating haemodynamic efficacy and mortality versus other positive inotropes is required, intravenous levosimendan appears to be a useful addition to the treatment options for acute decompensated heart failure in patients with low cardiac output.

Quetiapine. A review of its use in the management of schizophrenia

Quetiapine (Seroquel), a dibenzothiazepine derivative, is an atypical antipsychotic with demonstrated efficacy in acute schizophrenia. In short-term, randomised, double-blind trials, it was usually more effective than placebo, and was generally effective against both positive and negative symptoms. Overall, quetiapine (up to 750 mg/day) was at least as effective as chlorpromazine (up to 750 mg/day) and had similar efficacy to haloperidol (up to 16 mg/day) in patients with acute schizophrenia in randomised, double-blind trials; it was at least as effective as haloperidol 20 mg/day in patients with schizophrenia unresponsive or partially responsive to previous antipsychotic treatment. Improvements in overall psychopathology and positive and negative symptoms with quetiapine (up to 800 mg/day) were similar to those with risperidone (up to 8 mg/day) or olanzapine (15 mg/day) [interim analysis]. Efficacy was maintained for at least 52 weeks in open-label follow-up studies in adult and elderly patients. Quetiapine improved cognitive function versus haloperidol, and depressive symptoms and hostility/aggression versus placebo. Quetiapine is well tolerated. It is associated with placebo-level incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) across its entire dose range, appears to have a low risk for EPS in vulnerable patient groups (e.g. the elderly, adolescents or patients with organic brain disorders) and has a more favourable EPS profile than risperidone. Irrespective of dose, quetiapine, unlike risperidone and amisulpride, does not elevate plasma prolactin levels compared with placebo, and previously elevated levels may even normalise. Quetiapine appears to have minimal short-term effects on bodyweight and a favourable long-term bodyweight profile. Preliminary studies indicate that there is a high level of patient acceptability and satisfaction with quetiapine. In conclusion, quetiapine has shown efficacy against both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, and has benefits in improving cognitive deficits, affective symptoms and aggression/hostility. The beneficial effects of quetiapine have been maintained for at least 52 weeks. Quetiapine was effective and well tolerated in hard-to-treat patients, and may be of particular use in these individuals. It is at least as effective as standard antipsychotics and appears to have similar efficacy to risperidone and olanzapine. The relative risk/benefit profile of quetiapine compared with other atypical antipsychotics requires further research in head-to-head trials, although quetiapine's relatively benign tolerability profile distinguishes it from other commonly used atypical agents, particularly with respect to bodyweight, EPS and plasma prolactin levels. Overall, quetiapine has an excellent risk/benefit profile and is a suitable first-line option for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Lamotrigine: a review of its use in bipolar disorder

Lamotrigine (Lamictal), a phenyltriazine derivative, is a well established anticonvulsant agent that has shown efficacy in the prevention of mood episodes in adult patients with bipolar I disorder. The mechanism of action of the drug in patients with bipolar disorder may be related to the inhibition of sodium and calcium channels in presynaptic neurons and subsequent stabilisation of the neuronal membrane. Lamotrigine monotherapy significantly delayed time to intervention with additional pharmacotherapy or electroconvulsive therapy for any new mood episode (mania, hypomania, depression and mixed episodes), compared with placebo, in two large, randomised, double-blind trials of 18 months' duration. Additionally, lamotrigine was significantly superior to placebo at prolonging time to intervention for depression. These effects of lamotrigine were demonstrated in both recently manic/hypomanic and recently depressed patients. Lamotrigine showed efficacy in delaying manic/hypomanic episodes in pooled data only, although lithium was superior to lamotrigine on this measure. Two of four double-blind, short-term studies have shown lamotrigine to be more effective than placebo in the treatment of patients with treatment-refractory bipolar disorder or those with bipolar depression. Lamotrigine has not demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acute mania. Lamotrigine was generally well tolerated in maintenance studies with the most common adverse events being headache, nausea, infection and insomnia. Incidences of diarrhoea and tremor were significantly lower in lamotrigine- than in lithium-treated patients. The incidence of serious rash with lamotrigine treatment was 0.1% in all studies of bipolar disorder and included one case of mild Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Lamotrigine did not appear to cause bodyweight gain. The dosage of lamotrigine is titrated over a 6-week period to 200 mg/day to minimise the incidence of serious rash. Adjustments to the initial and target dosages are required if coadministered with valproate semisodium or carbamazepine.

CONCLUSION

Lamotrigine has been shown to be an effective maintenance therapy for patients with bipolar I disorder, significantly delaying time to intervention for any mood episode. Additionally, lamotrigine significantly delayed time to intervention for a depressive episode and showed limited efficacy in delaying time to intervention for a manic/hypomanic episode, compared with placebo. Although not approved for the short-term treatment of mood episodes, lamotrigine has shown efficacy in the acute treatment of patients with bipolar depression but has not demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acute mania. Lamotrigine is generally well tolerated, does not appear to cause bodyweight gain and, unlike lithium, generally does not require monitoring of serum levels.

Octreotide long-acting release (LAR): a review of its use in the management of acromegaly

Octreotide long-acting release (LAR) is a somatostatin analogue designed for once monthly intramuscular injection. As with endogenous somatostatin, octreotide LAR inhibits secretion of growth hormone (GH) as well as various other peptide hormones. In the treatment of acromegaly, octreotide LAR effectively controlled the secretion of GH and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in about 55-70% of patients (n > 100) who had previously been treated with somatostatin analogues, a similar degree of control to that observed with subcutaneous octreotide and lanreotide slow release (SR). Progressive control of serum levels of GH and IGF-1 was achieved with octreotide LAR in clinical studies of up to 4 years' duration. In addition, primary therapy with octreotide LAR provided effective control of GH and IGF-1 secretion, particularly in patients with a pretreatment GH level <20 microg/L. The percentage of patients achieving a target serum GH level of <2-2.5 micro g/L or normal IGF-1 levels was significantly greater with octreotide LAR 10, 20 or 30 mg every 28 days than with lanreotide SR 30 mg every 7-14 days in a large (n = 125) sequential, 6-month study, but was not significantly different between treatment groups in a small, randomised, nonblind, parallel group study of previously untreated patients. The volume of pituitary tumour shrinkage achieved with octreotide LAR or lanreotide SR was also similar ( approximate, equals 33% after 24 months). Acromegaly symptoms, such as headache, increased perspiration, paraesthesia, fatigue and osteoarthralgia were improved during treatment with octreotide LAR or lanreotide SR. Overall, octreotide LAR is generally well tolerated by most patients. The incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms is about 30% but, in most cases, events are transient and mild to moderate. Gallbladder abnormalities (sediment, sludge, microlithiasis and gallstones) can occur, but only 1% have become symptomatic to date. The prevalence of biliary abnormalities did not change after switching from subcutaneous octreotide, or from lanreotide SR, to octreotide LAR. Glucose metabolism can be affected by octreotide LAR in some patients; about 15% become hyperglycaemic, usually mild in severity. In summary, octreotide LAR controls GH and IGF-1 secretion in about 55-70% of patients with acromegaly. Octreotide LAR is administered intramuscularly every 28 days, offering improved patient compliance and convenience over three-times-daily subcutaneous octreotide. Long-term therapy provides progressive control of serum GH and IGF-1 levels, and is generally well tolerated by most patients. Thus, for the medical management of acromegaly, octreotide LAR is an effective, well tolerated and convenient treatment option.