Daratumumab, Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone With Minimal Residual Disease Response-Adapted Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE

The MASTER trial combined daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Dara-KRd) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), using minimal residual disease (MRD) by next-generation sequencing (NGS) to inform the use and duration of Dara-KRd post-autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) and treatment cessation in patients with two consecutive MRD-negative assessments.

METHODS

This multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial enrolled patients with NDMM with planed enrichment for high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs). Patients received Dara-KRd induction, AHCT, and Dara-KRd consolidation, according to MRD status. MRD was evaluated by NGS at the end of induction, post-AHCT, and every four cycles (maximum of eight cycles) of consolidation. Primary end point was achievement of MRD negativity (< 10^-5). Patients with two consecutive MRD-negative assessments entered treatment-free MRD surveillance.

RESULTS

Among 123 participants, 43% had none, 37% had 1, and 20% had 2+ HRCA. Median age was 60 years (range, 36-79 years), and 96% had MRD trackable by NGS. Median follow-up was 25.1 months. Overall, 80% of patients reached MRD negativity (78%, 82%, and 79% for patients with 0, 1, and 2+ HRCA, respectively), 66% reached MRD < 10^-6, and 71% reached two consecutive MRD-negative assessments during therapy, entering treatment-free surveillance. Two-year progression-free survival was 87% (91%, 97%, and 58% for patients with 0, 1, and 2+ HRCA, respectively). Cumulative incidence of MRD resurgence or progression 12 months after cessation of therapy was 4%, 0%, and 27% for patients with 0, 1, or 2+ HRCA, respectively. Most common serious adverse events were pneumonia (6%) and venous thromboembolism (3%).

CONCLUSION

Dara-KRd, AHCT, and MRD response-adapted consolidation leads to high rate of MRD negativity in NDMM. For patients with 0 or 1 HRCA, this strategy creates the opportunity of MRD surveillance as an alternative to indefinite maintenance.

Associação Brasileira de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular Consensus on genetically modified cells. IV: CAR-T cell therapy for multiple myeloma patients

Extraordinary progress has been made over the last decade in the treatment of multiple myeloma with the incorporation of new drugs, particularly proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators, and monoclonal antibodies.

The combined use of innovative drugs, already in the first lines of treatment, has led to an expressive increase in the survival of these patients. However, the approach to relapse remains a great challenge, and the disease continues to be incurable. In this scenario, modern immunotherapy has gained the limelight, especially with its recent use of CAR-T cells in clinical trials, as in the case of multiple myeloma, having the BCMA as the primary target.

The results are impactful in the treatment of multiple myeloma patients who have had multiple relapses and are triple- and penta-refractory. In this Consensus, we have brought together a group of experts in multiple myeloma to discuss and forward their recommendations for the future, which we hope is very near, incorporating the CAR-T in our country.

Associação Brasileira de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular Consensus on genetically modified cells. I: Structuring centers for the multidisciplinary clinical administration and management of CAR-T cell therapy patients

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T cells) are a new modality of oncological treatment which has demonstrated impressive response in refractory or relapsed diseases, such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), lymphomas, and myeloma but is also associated with unique and potentially life-threatening toxicities. The most common adverse events (AEs) include cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurological toxicities, such as the immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), cytopenias, infections, and hypogammaglobulinemia. These may be severe and require admission of the patient to an intensive care unit. However, these AEs are manageable when recognized early and treated by a duly trained team. The objective of this article is to report a consensus compiled by specialists in the fields of oncohematology, bone marrow transplantation, and cellular therapy describing recommendations on the Clinical Centers preparation, training of teams that will use CAR-T cells, and leading clinical questions as to their use and the management of potential complications.

Chromosomal 1q21 abnormalities in multiple myeloma: a review of translational, clinical research, and therapeutic strategies

INTRODUCTION

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease with a median overall survival of approximately 5 years. Gain or amplification of 1q21 (1q21+) occurs in around 40% of patients with MM and generally portends a poor prognosis. Patients with MM who harbor 1q21+ are at increased risk of drug resistance, disease progression, and death. New pharmacotherapies with novel modes of action are required to overcome the negative prognostic impact of 1q21+. Areas covered: This review discusses the detection, biology, prognosis, and therapeutic targeting of 1q21+ in newly diagnosed and relapsed MM. Patients with MM and 1q21+ tend to present with higher tumor burden, greater end-organ damage, and more co-occurring high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities than patients without 1q21+. The chromosomal rearrangements associated with 1q21+ result in dysregulation of genes involved in oncogenesis. Identification and characterization of the 1q21+ molecular targets are needed to inform on prognosis and treatment strategy. Clinical trial data are emerging that addition of isatuximab to combination therapies may improve outcomes in patients with 1q21+ MM. Expert opinion: In the next 5 years, the results of ongoing research and trials are likely to focus on the therapeutic impact and treatment decisions associated with 1q21+ in MM.

Impact of sociodemographic factors on early mortality in acute promyelocytic leukemia in the United States: A time-trend analysis

BACKGROUND

The survival of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) has dramatically improved with the use of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO). However, because of the complexity of the initial management, early mortality (EM) remains a major contributor to treatment failure. It is less known whether advances in treatment, urgent access to specialized care, and broad availability of ATRA/ATO have reduced EM in the last 2 decades. Furthermore, the influence of sociodemographic factors on the risk of EM also remains unclear.

METHODS

This study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program to characterize the impact of sociodemographic factors on the rates of EM and overall survival (OS) in patients with APL diagnosed between 1992 and 2015.

RESULTS

In all, 2224 cases were identified (895 who were younger than 40 years and 1329 who were 40 years old or older); 47.9% had a county-level median household income of $59,630 or higher, 49.0% belonged to counties where more than 31% of adults held at least a bachelor's degree, and 86.0% resided in urban areas. The rate of EM declined from 31.5% in 1992-1995 to 15.9% in 2012-2015 for all patients. It improved for patients younger than 40 years (27.4% in 1992-1995 vs 5.4% in 2012-2015; P < .001) and for patients 40 years old or older but not to the same extent (35.2% in 1992-1995 vs 22.2% in 2012-2015; P = .02). Importantly, improvements in EM were not seen among patients residing in rural areas, with the rate remaining higher than 20% in 2012-2015. The 3-year OS rate was 49.2% for patients with APL diagnosed in 1992-1995 and 76.4% for patients diagnosed in 2012-2015.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings confirm consistent improvements in EM and OS for patients with APL and point to the challenge of further extending these improvements in EM rates to older patients and to those living in rural areas.

Cilta-cel versus conventional treatment in patients with relapse/refractory multiple myeloma

8030

Background: CARTITUDE-1 is a single arm study of Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel; JNJ-68284528) anti-BCMA CAR-T cell therapy in US patients (pts) with relapsed multiple myeloma (RRMM) refractory to both IMiD and proteasome inhibitor (PI) or with at least 3 prior lines of therapy and previously exposed to anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (MoAb). While recently reported efficacy results of cilta-cel were encouraging, it is unknown how they compare with similar pts receiving conventional (non CAR-T) treatment. Methods: We utilized a contemporary US-based dataset of pts with MM refractory to anti-CD38 MoAb (MAMMOTH) to identify pts who would meet eligibility for CARTITUDE-1 and who received conventional therapy. We analyzed the intent-to-treat population (ITT) in CARTITUDE-1, defined as pts who underwent apheresis (N=113) and a modified ITT population (mITT) defined as subset of pts who received cilta-cel at the RP2D (N=97). From the MAMMOTH dataset, we identified a population corresponding to CARTITUDE-1 ITT (N=190) and a mITT population, pts without death or progression within 47 days (median time between apheresis and cilta-cel infusion) from onset of therapy (N=122). We calculated propensity scores (PS) with demographics, N of prior therapies, cytogenetics and refractoriness to MM agents as covariates. An analyst blinded to outcomes performed nearest neighbor 1:1 PS matching. We analyzed overall response rate (ORR), progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for ITT and mITT in CARTITUDE-1 vs matching MAMMOTH cohorts. Results: Ninety-five ITT (75 received bridging therapy, 82 received cilta-cel) and 69 mITT (54 received bridging) CARTITUDE-1 pts matched MAMMOTH pts (Table). Among the pts in the MAMMOTH ITT cohort 34% received pomalidomide, 24% anti-CD38 MoAb, 19% carfilzomib and 35% cytotoxic chemotherapy in next therapy. ORR in the ITT cohorts was higher in CARTITUDE-1 (84% vs. 28%). Compared to their MAMMOTH counterparts, pts in CARTITUDE-1 ITT cohort had improved PFS (12 mo. 73% vs. 12%) and OS (12 mo. 83% vs 39%). Between the mITT cohorts, CARTITUDE-1 pts had superior ORR (96% vs. 30%), PFS (12 mo 79% vs. 15%) and OS (12 mo. 88% vs. 41%). Conclusions: In pts with RRMM beyond therapy with IMID, PI, and anti-CD38 MoAb, treatment with cilta-cel is associated with higher response rate and superior PFS and OS when compared to conventional treatment.[Table: see text]

Updated results of a phase 1, first-in-human study of talquetamab, a G protein-coupled receptor family C group 5 member D (GPRC5D) × CD3 bispecific antibody, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM)

8008

Background: New immunotherapy targets in MM are needed as patients (pts) continue to relapse. The orphan receptor GPRC5D is expressed on malignant plasma cells in MM. Talquetamab (JNJ-64407564) is a bispecific IgG4 antibody that redirects T cell killing to MM cells by binding to the novel target, GPRC5D, and CD3. We present updated results of talquetamab at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) from a phase 1 trial in relapsed/refractory MM. Methods: Eligible pts with MM who had relapsed or refractory disease or were intolerant to standard therapies received talquetamab intravenously (IV; range 0.5–180 µg/kg) or subcutaneously (SC; range 5.0–800 µg/kg) weekly or biweekly. Primary objectives were identification of the RP2D (part 1) and talquetamab safety and tolerability at the RP2D (part 2). Adverse events (AEs) were graded by CTCAE v4.03 (cytokine release syndrome [CRS] per Lee 2014). Response was assessed per IMWG criteria. Results: As of Feb 8, 2021, 174 pts received talquetamab, 102 by IV and 72 by SC; in parts 1 and 2, 28 pts were treated at the RP2D, identified as weekly SC 405 µg/kg, with 10.0 and 60.0 µg/kg step-up doses. Pts treated at the RP2D had a median age of 61.5 y (range 46–80) and a median of 5.5 prior lines of therapy (range 2–14; 100%/79% triple-class/penta-drug exposed; 71%/18% triple-class/penta-drug refractory; 86% refractory to last line of therapy; 21% with prior B-cell maturation antigen–directed therapy). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred at the RP2D in part 1. Most common AEs at the RP2D were CRS (79%; grade 3 4%; median time to onset: day after SC injection), neutropenia (64%; grade 3/4 54%), anemia (57%; grade 3/4 29%) and dysgeusia (57%; all grade 1/2); infections were reported in 32% of pts (grade 3/4 4%) and neurotoxicity in 7% (grade 3/4 0). In all, 75% of pts dosed at the RP2D had skin-related AEs (grade 3/4 0), including 18% with nail disorders. The overall response rate at the RP2D in response-evaluable pts (n = 24) was 63%, with 50% reaching very good partial response or better; 9/17 (53%) evaluable triple-class refractory pts and 3/3 (100%) penta-drug refractory pts had a response. Median time to first confirmed response at the RP2D was 1.0 mo (range 0.2–3.8); responses were durable and deepened over time (median follow-up 6.2 mo [range 2.7–9.7+] for responders at the RP2D). At the RP2D, exposure was maintained over the maximum EC90 target level from an ex vivo cytotoxicity assay, and consistent T cell activation was seen. Conclusions: At the RP2D of weekly 405 µg/kg SC, talquetamab showed a high clinical response rate and was well-tolerated in pts with relapsed/refractory MM; based on pharmacokinetic data, other SC dosing strategies are being explored. The promising efficacy, safety profile and convenience of SC dosing support monotherapy development and combination approaches with this novel agent. Clinical trial information: NCT03399799.

Anakinra (AKR) prophylaxis (ppx) in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) receiving orvacabtagene autoleucel (orva-cel)

2537

Background: Orva-cel is a B-cell maturation antigen–targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy being evaluated in the phase 1/2 EVOLVE study (NCT03430011) in pts with RRMM who had at least 3 prior lines of therapy (Tx). We previously reported safety and efficacy in the phase 1 study and established the recommended dose (RD) of orva-cel as 600 × 106 CAR+ T cells (Mailankody et al, ASCO 2020). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS), a dominant toxicity of CAR T cell therapy, is mediated in part by IL-1. We explore the role of ppx with AKR, an IL-1 signaling inhibitor, on reducing the incidence of grade (G) ≥2 CRS after orva-cel treatment at the RD. Methods: Fourteen pts were enrolled sequentially for AKR ppx and treated with orva-cel at the RD. The non-AKR ppx control group comprised the remainder of the phase 1 pts receiving orva-cel at the RD (n = 19). The median follow-up (range) was 3.0 mo (1.8–6.2) for the AKR ppx group and 8.8 mo (5.3–12.2) for the non-AKR ppx group. AKR was administered as 100 mg SC the night before orva-cel infusion, 3 h before the infusion (Day 1), and q24 h on Days 2–5. Dosing was increased to q12 h if CRS developed. CRS was graded by Lee (2014) criteria. Tocilizumab (T) and steroids (S) were used per protocol-specified treatment management guidelines. Results: Disease characteristics and outcomes are shown in the table. In AKR ppx and non-AKR ppx groups, median number of prior regimens was 6 and 5, and bridging Tx was used in 57% and 68% of pts, respectively. The total frequency of CRS was similar in the 2 groups, but with less G 2 in the AKR ppx pts; relative risk (95% CI) = 0.54 (0.21, 1.38). No G ≥3 CRS was seen in either group. The incidence of neurological events (NE), G ≥3 infection, and macrophage activation syndrome/hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (MAS/HLH) was similar. T and S use was numerically lower with AKR ppx. Orva-cel expansion kinetics were similar in the 2 groups. All pts had a 2-month efficacy assessment, with ORR in 100% of AKR ppx and 95% of non–AKR ppx pts. Conclusions: In this nonrandomized evaluation of AKR ppx with orva-cel treatment, the incidence of G ≥2 CRS was lower in pts receiving AKR ppx. The use of AKR ppx produced no adverse effect on the incidence of NE, infection, or MAS/HLH, nor on orva-cel expansion or disease response. These results warrant further study of AKR ppx in CAR T cell therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03430011. [Table: see text]

Impact of insurance status on the survival of younger patients diagnosed with acute promyelocytic leukemia in the United States

BACKGROUND

Survival among patients diagnosed with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) has significantly improved with the use of all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide. However, the need for immediate diagnosis and access to specialized care and the cost associated with APL management can potentially act as barriers for disadvantaged patients. The influence of sociodemographic factors on the outcomes of patients with APL remains unclear.

METHODS

The authors used the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program to characterize the impact of sociodemographic factors on survival in patients younger than 65 years with APL.

RESULTS

The authors identified 1787 cases: 816 who were younger than 40 years and 971 who were 40 years old or older. Insured patients who were younger than 40 years had an improved 5-year overall survival (OS) rate in comparison with patients without insurance. Among patients who were 40 years or older, having insurance (other than Medicaid) was associated with better survival than being a Medicaid beneficiary or being uninsured, whereas patients with Medicaid had improved 5-year OS in comparison with uninsured patients. In a multivariate analysis of patients younger than 40 years, a higher risk of death was associated with being male, being diagnosed in earlier years, and being uninsured. For patients who were 40 years old or older, mortality increased with increasing age and for both Medicaid and uninsured patients in comparison with insured patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the high cure rate experienced by patients with APL, patients younger than 65 years without insurance and those 40 years old or older with Medicaid are at a significant disadvantage in comparison with patients with insurance. These findings point to an opportunity to improve survival in APL by addressing access to care.

New regimens and directions in the management of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

The introduction of novel agents over the last decade has rapidly expanded the therapeutic landscape of multiple myeloma (MM) for both transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible patients. The assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) by next-generation flow cytometry or next-generation sequencing is established as a powerful predictor of long-term outcomes. The use of MRD in response-adapted clinical trials may provide opportunities to identify candidates for treatment escalation and de-escalation. Agents with proven activity in the relapsed and refractory setting are being studied in the management of high-risk newly diagnosed MM (NDMM). Here, we summarize the most recent clinical trials that have led to the current paradigms in the management of NDMM. We also discuss how novel agents could be incorporated in the newly diagnosed setting and potential clinical trial designs that could leverage MRD information with the goal of treatment optimization.

Defining and Managing High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: Current Concepts

Multiple myeloma is a very heterogeneous disease. Despite advances in diagnostics and therapeutics, a subset of patients still experiences abbreviated responses to therapy, frequent relapses, and short survival and is considered to have high-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM). Stage III diagnosis according to the International Staging System; the presence of del(17p), t(4;14), or t(14;16) by fluorescence in situ hybridization; certain gene expression patterns; high serum lactic dehydrogenase level; and the presence of extramedullary disease at diagnosis are all considered indicators of HRMM. More recent evidence shows that patients who experience response to therapy but with a high burden of measurable residual disease or persistence of abnormal FDG uptake on PET/CT scan after initial therapy also have unfavorable outcomes, shaping the concept of dynamic risk assessment. Triplet therapy with proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, and corticosteroids and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation remain the pillars of HRMM therapy. Recent evidence indicates a benefit of immunotherapy with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies in HRMM. Future trials will inform the impact of novel immunotherapeutic approaches, including T-cell engagers, CAR T cells, and nonimmunotherapeutic approaches in HRMM. Those agents are likely to be deployed early in the disease course in the setting of risk- and response-adapted trials.

Evaluation of Daratumumab for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma in Patients With High-risk Cytogenetic Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

The addition of daratumumab to backbone multiple myeloma (MM) regimens is associated with improved response rates and progression-free survival (PFS). Whether improved outcomes are also associated with this regimen among patients with cytogenetically defined high-risk MM (HRMM) remains unclear.

Objective

To measure PFS associated with adding daratumumab to backbone MM regimens among patients with HRMM.

Data Sources

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, clinical trials registries, and meeting libraries were searched from inception to January 2, 2020, using terms reflecting multiple myeloma and daratumumab.

Study Selection

Included studies were phase 3 randomized clinical trials that compared backbone MM regimens with the same regimen plus daratumumab in newly diagnosed or relapsed or refractory MM, such that the only difference between the intervention and control groups was use of daratumumab and reported outcomes by cytogenetic risk. High-risk MM was defined as the presence of t(4;14), t(14;16), or del(17p).

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline, 2 investigators independently extracted study data, with disagreements resolved by a third investigator. Quality was assessed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias method.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Data on effectiveness were extracted using hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS. Relative log-HRs were pooled using a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q and the I2 statistic.

Results

Of 5194 studies screened, 6 phase 3 trials were eligible, including 3 trials for newly diagnosed MM (2528 patients; 358 with HRMM) and 3 trials for relapsed or refractory MM (1533 patients; 222 with HRMM). Among patients with newly diagnosed HRMM, the addition of daratumumab to backbone regimens was associated with improved PFS (pooled HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-0.95; P = .02), with little evidence of heterogeneity (Cochran Q, P = .77; I2 = 0%). Similar results were seen among patients with relapsed or refractory HRMM (pooled HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.30-0.67; P < .001), again with little evidence of heterogeneity (Cochran Q, P = .63; I2 = 0%).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study suggests that incorporating daratumumab to backbone regimens may be associated with improved PFS among patients with newly diagnosed HRMM or relapsed or refractory HRMM.

Summary of the 2019 Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network Myeloma Intergroup Workshop on Minimal Residual Disease and Immune Profiling

The Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) Myeloma Intergroup has organized an annual workshop focused on minimal residual disease (MRD) testing and immune profiling (IP) in multiple myeloma since 2016. In 2019, the workshop took place as an American Society of Hematology (ASH) Friday Scientific Workshop titled "Immune Profiling and Minimal Residual Disease Testing in Multiple Myeloma." This workshop focused on 4 main topics: the molecular and immunologic evolution of plasma cell disorders, development of new laboratory- and imaging-based MRD assessment approaches, chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy research, and statistical and regulatory issues associated with novel clinical endpoints. In this report, we provide a summary of the workshop and discuss future directions.

Second primary malignancy among older adults with multiple myeloma receiving first-line lenalidomide-based therapy: A population-based analysis

OBJECTIVES

Clinical trials have suggested that patients with myeloma treated with lenalidomide may have an increased risk of second primary malignancies (SPM). Whether such risks are of significant relevance in the real-world clinical practice, particularly among older patients receiving first-line lenalidomide based therapy, remains unclear.

METHODS

Using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database, we identified adults ≥ 65 years with plasma cell myeloma diagnosed in 2007-2015 who received at least one oral anti-myeloma agent. We defined first-line lenalidomide-containing therapy as use within 90 days of diagnosis. SPM was defined as a malignancy reported to a cancer registry > 90 days after myeloma diagnosis. We computed cumulative incidence of SPM (with death being a competing event) and compared SPM rates between patients treated with or without first-line lenalidomide using a Fine-Gray's model, adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity, prior malignancy, and histologic subtype.

RESULTS

Of 9850 Medicare beneficiaries, 4009 (41%) received first-line lenalidomide. During median follow up of 5.0 years, 423 patients (4.3%) developed SPM, including 361 solid tumors (85%) and 61 hematologic malignancies (14%). The cumulative incidence of any SPM at 5 years was similar among those who received first-line lenalidomide and those who did not (5.3% vs 4.4%; sub-hazard ratio, SHR 1.06, P = .53). Consistent results were seen in the risk of solid tumor (4.7% vs 3.6%; SHR 1.13, P = .24) or hematologic malignancy (4.7 vs 3.6%, SHR 0.73; P = .72).

CONCLUSION

First-line lenalidomide therapy among older adults with myeloma was not associated with a significantly increased risk of any SPM.

Recent survival trends in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma--Have we made any progress beyond rituximab?

Background

Population‐based studies previously showed an improvement in overall survival (OS) for patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who received chemoimmunotherapy with rituximab. However, there is limited data (especially at the population level) that show a similar trend in OS improvement, in the most recent time period. We hypothesized that survival for DLBCL patients diagnosed in the United States has continued to improve in recent years and intended to measure outcome improvements.

Methods

Using the SEER‐18 registries, we compared the incidence and relative survival rates (RSRs) of DLBCL patients between 2002‐2007 and 2008‐2013 (availability of novel agents, broader use of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation and improvement in supportive care). Multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess associations between the year of diagnosis and OS while controlling for age, gender, stage, and ethnicity.

Results

There were a total of 53 439 patients with DLBCL who were diagnosed between 2002 and 2013. Of these, 25 810 were diagnosed during time period‐1 and 27 629 diagnosed during time period‐2. There was a slight decline in incidence of DLBCL (time period‐1 vs time period‐2), 7.75 (95% CI = 7.66‐7.84) vs 7.43 (95% CI = 7.34‐7.52) cases per 100 000 persons, respectively (P < .0001). Overall, there was a modest improvement in DLBCL RSRs, with 5‐year RSR improving from 61% (time period‐1) to 64% (time period‐2) and the improvement was noted across all subsets of patients. On multivariable analysis, patients diagnosed in time period‐2 had lower mortality relative to time period‐1 (HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.85‐0.89).

Conclusions

Our study shows an improvement in the outcomes of DLBCL patients beyond the introduction of rituximab, although the magnitude of improvement is small. It will be interesting to see the impact of chimeric antigen receptor‐T cell therapy translating to population‐level survival in the next 5 years.

Bortezomib induction prior to autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) for newly diagnosed light chain amyloidosis (AL): A study of 426 patients

8515

Background: AL is a clonal plasma cell (PC) disorder causing multiorgan dysfunction from amyloid fibril deposition. While bortezomib (B) induction has been used prior to AHCT recently, AHCT without prior induction has been a common practice. The primary objective of this study was to compare outcomes of AL patients who proceeded to AHCT without induction to those receiving pre-AHCT induction with B. Methods: Outcomes of 426 systemic AL AHCT recipients between 2014-2018 reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) were reviewed. Patients receiving induction with therapy other than B, AHCT occurring > 9 months after diagnosis, no documented AL end-organ involvement, myeloma-defining events and conditioning other than melphalan (MEL) monotherapy were excluded. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was conducted to identify prognostic factors associated with relapse, PFS and overall survival (OS). Results: 286 patients received B induction therapy vs 140 patients receiving no induction. Age, gender, number and type of organs involved, and AL AHCT center volume were similar between the groups. Patients receiving induction had greater PC burden compared with no induction (PC ≥ 10%, 41% vs 11%, p < 0.01). Induction was B, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (D) in 83% followed by B, lenalidomide and D (10%) or B+D (7%). Median follow-up was 24.9 months. At 2 years, B induction vs. no induction was associated with 13% (95% CI 10-17%) vs 22% (95% CI 15-30%) relapse risk (p = 0.03); 83% (95% CI 79-87%) vs 74% (95% CI 66-81%) PFS (p = 0.04); 93% (95% CI 90-95%) vs 94% (95% CI 89-97%) OS (p = 0.7). On MVA, the B induction group had improved PFS (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.3-0.7, p < 0.001) with similar OS (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.2, p = 0.1) compared with no induction. Creatinine < 2 mg/dl (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.3-0.9, p = 0.02) and Karnofsky score ≥90 (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.33-0.78, p < 0.01) were also associated with improved PFS. MEL dose < 180 mg/m2 was associated with inferior PFS (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.31-3.61, p < 0.01) and OS (HR 3.6, 95% CI 1.5-8.6, p < 0.01). No deaths were seen in the first 100 days post-AHCT. At last follow-up, 32 deaths occurred, 26 (81%) due to AL. Conclusions: Compared with prior CIBMTR analyses, B induction use has increased in AL AHCT recipients and a higher PC burden was the only clinical determinant. Furthermore, B induction was associated with lower relapse and improved PFS at 2 years with no OS difference despite higher proportion of patients with > 10% PC, which has been associated with poor outcomes.

Orvacabtagene autoleucel (orva-cel), a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed CAR T cell therapy for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): update of the phase 1/2 EVOLVE study (NCT03430011)

8504

Background: Orva-cel is an investigational, BCMA-directed CAR T cell product with a fully human binder. Over 100 pts have been treated in the EVOLVE phase 1 study. Pts treated at 50 and 150 × 106 CAR+ T cells were previously reported (Mailankody ASH 2018 #957). We now report results of the higher dose levels (DLs) in 51 pts who received orva-cel manufactured using the process intended to support commercial use. Methods: Pts with RRMM who had ≥3 prior regimens, a proteasome inhibitor (PI), an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb), received orva-cel at 300, 450, and 600 × 106 CAR+ T cells after lymphodepletion with fludarabine/cyclophosphamide. Results: Median pt age was 61 (range, 33–77) y; median time from diagnosis was 7.0 (range, 1.7–23.6) y, with a median of 6 (range, 3–18) prior regimens. Overall, 92% of pts were penta-exposed (2 IMiDs, 2 PIs, and an mAb); 61% of pts received bridging therapy (77% were refractory to bridging therapy). Two pts had dose-limiting toxicities: grade 3 neurological event (NE) for >7 d at 300 × 106 CAR+ T cells and grade 4 neutropenia for >28 d at 450 × 106 CAR+ T cells. Key efficacy and safety outcomes are shown in the Table. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS)/NEs were managed with tocilizumab and/or steroids (78%), anakinra (14%), and/or vasopressors (6%). Grade ≥3 anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia at 29 d occurred in 21%, 55%, and 44% of pts (median time to resolution to grade ≤2 of any cytopenia, ≤2.1 mo). Grade ≥3 infections occurred in 14%. After a median follow-up (F/U) of 5.9 mo, median progression-free survival was not reached. Conclusions: Orva-cel at 300, 450, and 600 × 106 CAR+ T cells demonstrated manageable safety (CRS grade ≥3: 2%; NE grade ≥3: 4%) and compelling efficacy in heavily pretreated pts with RRMM, with a 91% objective response rate (ORR) and 39% complete response (CR)/stringent CR (sCR) rate. Updated results will be presented, including minimal residual disease, durability of response, and recommended phase 2 dose. Clinical trial information: NCT03430011 . [Table: see text]

Efficacy of daratumumab in the treatment of multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics: Meta-analysis of randomized phase III trials

8540

Background: The addition of Daratumumab (D) to backbone multiple myeloma (MM) regimens leads to improved response rates and progression free survival (PFS). Whether improved outcomes are also seen among patients with high-risk cytogenetics (HRC) remains unclear, particularly in first-line (FL) setting. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of bibliographic databases, clinical trials registries and meeting libraries from inception to December 2019, for phase III randomized trials that compared backbone MM regimens vs. same regimen plus D either in FL or relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting and reported outcomes by cytogenetic risk (HRC vs standard risk cytogenetics, SRC). We defined HRC as presence of t(4;14), t(14;16) or del(17p). The primary endpoint was PFS. We pooled relative log-hazard ratios using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. We assessed heterogeneity using Cochran’s Q and the I2 statistic. Results: Of 3,070 studies screened, 6 phase III trials were included. This included 3 trials in FL setting (Alcyone, Maia and Cassiopeia, 2,528 patients, 358 HRC) and 3 trials in R/R setting (Castor, Pollux and Candor, 1,533 patients, 222 HRC). The addition of D to FL backbone regimens among patients with HRC led to improved PFS (pooled HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.47-0.95, p = 0.02) with little heterogeneity (Cochran’s Q p = 0.77, I2= 0), similar to R/R setting (pooled HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.30-0.67, p < 0.01, Cochran’s Q = 0.63, p < 0.01, I2= 0). Similar results were seen in SRC MM patients in FL setting (pooled HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.37-0.54, p < 0.01, Cochran’s Q p = 0.49, I2= 0) and R/R setting (pooled HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.25-0.56; p < 0.01, Cochran’s Q p = 0.04, I2= 70%). Conclusions: Incorporating D to backbone regimens led to improved PFS among patients with HRC MM in both FL and R/R setting. Lack of substantial heterogeneity suggests benefit of D regardless of backbone regimen. D based regimens are appropriate choices in FL and R/R setting for both SRC and HRC patients. Longer follow up with mature overall survival data is needed to validate these findings. [Table: see text]

Long-term survival of 1338 MM patients treated with tandem autologous vs. autologous-allogeneic transplantation

Contrary to tandem autologous transplant (auto-auto), autologous followed by reduced intensity conditioning allogenic transplantation (auto-allo) offers graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) effect but with higher toxicity. Trials comparing these two strategies relied on availability of HLA-matched sibling donors for arm allocation (biological randomization) and yielded conflicting results. A pooled analysis of multiple trials with extended follow up provides an opportunity to compare these strategies. We obtained individual patient data from participants of four trials comparing auto-auto vs. auto-allo after induction therapy. There were 899 patients in auto-auto and 439 in auto-allo. Median follow up of survivors was 118.5 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 78.0 months in auto-auto and 98.3 months in auto-allo (HR = 0.84, P = 0.02). OS was 36.4% vs. 44.1% at 10 years (P = 0.01) for auto-auto and auto-allo, respectively. Progression-free survival was also improved in auto-allo (HR = 0.84, P = 0.004). Risk of non-relapse mortality was higher in auto-allo (10 year 8.3% vs. 19.7%, P < 0.001), while risk of disease progression was higher in auto-auto (10 year 77.2% vs. 61.6%, P < 0.001). Median post relapse survival was 41.5 months in auto-auto and 62.3 months in auto-allo (HR = 0.71, P < 0.001). This supports the existence of durable GVM effect enhancing myeloma control with subsequent therapies.

Best practices for the assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) in multiple myeloma

Therapeutic advances in multiple myeloma have led to durable, deep remissions in a subset of patients. However, outcomes of patients achieving a complete response are not homogeneous. In recent years, measurable residual disease (MRD) has emerged as a prognostic biomarker. While several technologies have been evaluated to detect MRD, two assessment technologies are most frequently utilized in patients with multiple myeloma. Next-generation flow (NGF) uses flow cytometry to identify malignant plasma cells through the presence of immunologic markers located on the cell surface. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analyzes for the presence of sequences in immunoglobulin genes that were previously identified as markers of that specific patient's plasma cell malignant clone. Both methods are included in criteria for MRD by the International Myeloma Working Group, which defines MRD negativity as less than 10^-5. Recently, the NGS-based clonoSEQ® Assay obtained clearance from the US Food and Drug Administration, with a limit of detection of less than 10^-6 given proper sample input. Based on available evidence correlating attainment of MRD negativity with outcomes, MRD assessment has been incorporated into ongoing clinical trials. Analyses will provide additional insight into the correlation between MRD and outcome. This monograph examines the available trial data and provides recommendations on how to incorporate MRD assessment into clinical management.

Summary of the Third Annual Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network Myeloma Intergroup Workshop on Minimal Residual Disease and Immune Profiling

The third annual Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) Myeloma Intergroup Workshop on Minimal Residual Disease and Immune Profiling was held on November 29, 2018, at the American Society of Hematology (ASH) annual meeting. This workshop featured the latest research focused on minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment and immune profiling (IP) in myeloma as well as discussion of the statistical and regulatory issues intrinsic to the development of MRD as a surrogate endpoint. In this report, we provide a summary of the workshop and focus on the integration of MRD and IP assessment into trial design and clinical practice.

Can We Predict the Number of Circulating CD34+ Cells From the Complete Blood Cell Count Before and After Plerixafor in Patients With Lymphoproliferative Disorders?

Stem cell transplant is a common treatment for hematopoietic neoplasms. We use a standardized stem cell mobilization regimen consisting of the following: day 1, 6 mg of pegfilgrastim (pegylated formulation of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor); day 3, 24 mg of plerixafor (reversible CXCR4 antagonist) followed by peripheral blood stem cell collection (PBSC) on day 4 after collecting a sample to measure the circulating CD34+ cells by flow cytometry. Since the latter results are not available as quickly as a STAT complete blood count (CBC), we hypothesized that the difference in CBC parameters from DAY 3 TO DAY 4 could be useful to predict the final collection yield. To test our theory, we carried out the following process from September 2018 to February 2019: day 3, CBC with differential before plerixafor; day 4, CBC with differential and sample for CD34+ cells before starting PBSC. We collected the following data from the electronic medical records: gender, age, and CBC parameters preplerixafor (evening of day 3) and morning of day 4 (preapheresis) plus circulating CD34+ count. We used a paired Student t test to compare the results of each patient. Fifty-seven adults (35 males, 22 females) with a median age of 64 ± 13 years were included; 76% had the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. On day 3 (preplerixafor), the median hematocrit was 36 ± 8%, the WBC count was 29 ± 13 × 103/µL, and the platelet count was 189 ± 64 × 103/µL. On the next morning (day 4), the hematocrit and platelet counts were not significantly different at 36 ± 4% and 182 ± 60 × 103/µL, respectively (P > .05). However, the median WBC count was significantly higher with a median of 43 ± 16 × 103/µL (P = 2.5 × 10–20). In both CBCs with differential, neutrophils comprised the majority at 82% and 74% pre- and postplerixafor, respectively (P = .01), lymphocytes went from 7% to 8% (P > .05), and monocytes increased from 6% to 6.5% (P = .02). The median CD34+ count preapheresis was 40 ± 47 cells/µL. We did not find any strong correlation between day 3 and day 4 CBC parameters and the CD34+ count, with only a very weak trend for higher CD34+ cells with increasing day 4 WBC count (R2 = 0.225). We conclude that the precollection CD34+ cell count is the best way to predict the PBSC yield and must be performed in order to ensure the target number of CD34+ cells is met for a successful engraftment.

Oral Selinexor-Dexamethasone for Triple-Class Refractory Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

Selinexor, a selective inhibitor of nuclear export compound that blocks exportin 1 (XPO1) and forces nuclear accumulation and activation of tumor suppressor proteins, inhibits nuclear factor κB, and reduces oncoprotein messenger RNA translation, is a potential novel treatment for myeloma that is refractory to current therapeutic options.

METHODS

We administered oral selinexor (80 mg) plus dexamethasone (20 mg) twice weekly to patients with myeloma who had previous exposure to bortezomib, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, pomalidomide, daratumumab, and an alkylating agent and had disease refractory to at least one proteasome inhibitor, one immunomodulatory agent, and daratumumab (triple-class refractory). The primary end point was overall response, defined as a partial response or better, with response assessed by an independent review committee. Clinical benefit, defined as a minimal response or better, was a secondary end point.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients in the United States and Europe were included in the modified intention-to-treat population (primary analysis), and 123 were included in the safety population. The median age was 65 years, and the median number of previous regimens was 7; a total of 53% of the patients had high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. A partial response or better was observed in 26% of patients (95% confidence interval, 19 to 35), including two stringent complete responses; 39% of patients had a minimal response or better. The median duration of response was 4.4 months, median progression-free survival was 3.7 months, and median overall survival was 8.6 months. Fatigue, nausea, and decreased appetite were common and were typically grade 1 or 2 (grade 3 events were noted in up to 25% of patients, and no grade 4 events were reported). Thrombocytopenia occurred in 73% of the patients (grade 3 in 25% and grade 4 in 33%). Thrombocytopenia led to bleeding events of grade 3 or higher in 6 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Selinexor-dexamethasone resulted in objective treatment responses in patients with myeloma refractory to currently available therapies. (Funded by Karyopharm Therapeutics; STORM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02336815.).

Challenges and opportunities in the assessment of measurable residual disease in multiple myeloma

Treatment response assessment in multiple myeloma (MM) relies on the detection of paraprotein in serum and/or urine, bone marrow morphology and immunohistochemistry. With remarkable advances in therapy, particularly in the newly diagnosed setting, achievement of complete remission became frequent, creating the need to identify smaller amounts of residual disease and understand their prognostic and therapeutic implications. Measurable residual disease (MRD) can be assessed primarily by flow cytometry and next generation sequencing and state-of-the-art assays have sensitivity approaching 1 in 10⁶ cells. This review discusses the existing challenges in utilizing MRD to inform management of MM and highlights open research questions and opportunities as MRD is more routinely incorporated into clinical practice for patients with MM.

Abstract 4200: Racial differences in multiple myeloma cases with anemia

Introduction. Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy defined, in part, by prolonged survival and accumulation of clonally expanded plasma cells in the bone marrow microenvironment and extramedullary sites and the presence of hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia or bone involvement, collectively known as end organ damage. MM is the most common hematologic malignancy affecting Blacks in the US, with standardized incidence rates that are 2 to 3-fold higher than Whites. A rationale for the disparity remains unclear.

Methods. Using participants enrolled in the Molecular And Genetic Epidemiology (iMAGE) study of myeloma (515 MM cases; 54.1%White, 41.9% Black), we examined the clinical and laboratory features associated with the presence of anemia in MM cases at diagnosis and differences by race to provide a rationale for the observed disparity. Risk estimates were calculated using odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals from logistic regression adjusted for sex, age at diagnosis, presence of other end organ damage and race, where appropriate. Sensitivity analyses were conducted in MM cases with only anemia as the end organ damage.

Results. Overall, anemia was present in 16.7% of MM cases as the only end organ damage at diagnosis and in 56.8% of MM cases as one or more end organ damage. In the combined population, no notable differences by sex or age were observed among MM cases with anemia; however, the presence of anemia was significantly elevated in Blacks compared to Whites (OR=2.11, 95% CI 1.36-3.27; P=0.001) and among Blacks, women were significantly more likely to present with anemia at diagnosis (P=0.002). Overall, compared to MM cases without anemia at diagnosis, significantly more MM cases with anemia exhibited clonal bone marrow plasma cells ≥ 60% (OR=2.43, 1.58-3.76; P&lt;0.0001), high serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH &gt;300 units/L; OR=5.03, 95% CI 1.47-17.27; P&lt;0.0001), serum total monoclonal protein ≥ 3 g/dL (OR=2.85, 95% CI 1.76-4.62; P&lt;0.0001), involved to uninvolved serum free light chain ratio ≥ 100 (OR=2.20, 95% CI 1.33-3.62; P=0.002) and among chromosomal abnormalities, translocation 4;14 (FGFR3; OR=7.27, 95% CI 1.54-34.28; P=0.012), deletion 13q (OR=1.96, 95% CI 1.14-3.34; P=0.013) and chromosome 1q amplification (OR=2.76, 95% CI 1.31-5.80; P=0.007) after adjusting for confounders. In contrast, MM cases with anemia were significantly less likely to present with serum albumin ≥ 3.5 mg/dL (OR=0.30, 95% CI 0.19-0.47; P&lt;0.0001) and bone involvement (OR=0.23, 95% CI 0.13-0.42; P&lt;0.0001). No notable differences in clinical or laboratory features with the presence of anemia at diagnosis were observed by race. Findings were confirmed in sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions. The excess risk of MM observed in Blacks and the variation in clinical features observed in MM patients according to the presence of anemia at diagnosis may contribute to disparate trends in incidence yet similar overall survival rates.

Citation Format: Riddhi Modi, Luciano J. Costa, Elizabeth E. Brown. Racial differences in multiple myeloma cases with anemia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4200.

Phase I/II, open-label, 2-arm study to evaluate safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of GSK2857916 in combination with 2 standard-of-care (SoC) regimens in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: (DREAMM 6)

TPS8053

Background: B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is a validated therapeutic target in Multiple Myeloma (MM). GSK2857916 is a humanized (IgG1) anti-BCMA monoclonal antibody conjugated to monomethyl auristatin-F via protease resistant maleimidocaproyl linker and produced in afucosylated form to enhance antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. In FTIH study BMA117159, GSK2857916 was well tolerated and showed unprecedented clinical activity [ORR=60%; mPFS 7.9 months (95% CI, 3.1–not estimable)] as monotherapy in heavily pretreated MM patients. GSK2857916 in combination with SoC regimens, could potentially further improve outcomes for patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) MM. Methods: DREAMM 6 is a 2-part study: Part 1 (dose escalation) is evaluating safety and tolerability of 2 doses (2.5 mg/kg and 3.4 mg/kg) of GSK2857916, in combination with SoC regimens in two independent arms: Arm A with Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone, and Arm B with Bortezomib/Dexamethasone. Modified Toxicity Probability Interval design will guide dose escalation and RP2D of GSK2857916 in each arm for Part 2 (cohort expansion). Part 2 will confirm safety, evaluate clinical activity of GSK2857916 RP2D with either combination and collect pharmacokinetic information on GSK2857916, Lenalidomide and bortezomib. Up to 90 subjects previously treated with at least 1 prior line of therapy who have undergone autologous stem cell transplant or are transplant-ineligible will be enrolled; up to 24 in Part 1 and up to 66 in Part 2. Subjects in Arm A will continue combination treatment until progression, intolerance, consent withdrawal or death. Subjects in Arm B will receive up to 8 cycles of GSK2857916 in combination with Bor/Dex and then continue GSK2857916 monotherapy until progression, intolerance, consent withdrawal, or death. Enrolment on study started in October 2018 and is ongoing. Study funded by GlaxoSmithKline; drug linker technology licensed from Seattle Genetics; monoclonal antibody produced using POTELLIGENT Technology licensed from BioWa. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03544281.

Outcomes of fludarabine, high dose cytarabine and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (FLAG) as re-induction for residual acute myeloid leukemia on day 14 bone marrow

BACKGROUND

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with intensive chemotherapy may require re-induction based on the evaluation of day 14 bone marrow biopsy.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed to evaluate adult patients with AML who received re-induction with fludarabine, high dose cytarabine and granulocyte colony stimulating factor (FLAG) regimen for residual disease (≥ 5% blasts by morphology) on day 14 bone marrow examination between September 2012 and July 2017 at our institution.

RESULTS

We identified 27 patients who received FLAG therapy for treatment of residual disease on day 14 marrow examination following initial induction. The median age at diagnosis was 61 years and the majority of patients had poor risk AML. The overall response rate was 78% and 15 patients proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

CONCLUSION

The regimen was well tolerated and is a viable re-induction option for patients with residual disease on a day 14 bone marrow.

Efficacy of salvage chemotherapy in diffuse large B cell lymphoma with primary treatment failure according to putative cell of origin

We evaluated outcome of 235 primary treatment failure (PTF) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients based on salvage chemotherapy regimen and putative cell-of-origin (COO). Patients were divided into two groups; group A (n = 38) received high-dose cytarabine containing regimen, either DHAP or ESHAP. Patients in group B (n = 197) received ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) +/- rituximab. No difference in overall response rates (CR + PR) was observed based on salvage chemotherapy regimen and COO. After adjustment for the presence of ultra high-risk features, overall survival of germinal center B-cell like (GCB) DLBCL patients in group A was not significantly different from survival in group B (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.46-1.60, p = .64). Similarly, within non-GCB DLBCL cohort, survival in group A was comparable to group B (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.20-1.44, p = .21). We did not find an outcome difference between two commonly used salvage chemotherapy regimens in patients with PTF DLBCL based on COO.

Obinutuzumab plus CHOP is effective and has a tolerable safety profile in previously untreated, advanced diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: the phase II GATHER study

This study investigated the safety and efficacy of obinutuzumab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (G-CHOP) in patients with advanced diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and explored the impact of cell-of-origin (COO) on patient outcomes. Patients (N = 100) received obinutuzumab (1000 mg on the days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1, and day 1 of cycles 2-8) plus CHOP (cycles 1-6). For patients without grade ≥3 infusion-related reactions (IRRs) to standard-rate obinutuzumab infusion, a shorter duration of infusion (SDI) was evaluated. Overall and complete response rates, as determined according to the Cheson et al. criteria by investigators/independent radiological facility, were 82.0/75.0% and 55.0/58.0%, respectively. SDI of 120 minutes and 90 minutes were well tolerated with no grade ≥3 IRRs. Among all patients, IRRs typically occurred during cycle 1, day 1. G-CHOP is active and has an acceptable safety profile in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced DLBCL. Clinical Trials: NCT01414855DLBCL.

Mobilization of Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells for Autologous Transplantation Using Pegfilgrastim and Plerixafor: Efficacy and Cost Implications

Filgrastim (FIL) is the most common growth factor combined with plerixafor for autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization, but requires daily, multi-injection administration. We adopted a standardized mobilization regimen with pegfilgrastim (PEG) and upfront plerixafor, allowing for a single injection given the long half-life and slow elimination of PEG. Between 2015 and 2017, a total of 235 patients with lymphoma or plasma cell dyscrasias underwent mobilization with PEG 6 mg on day 1 and upfront plerixafor 24 mg on day 3, followed by apheresis on day 4 regardless of peripheral blood CD34⁺ cells. The median CD34⁺ cells/mm³ in peripheral blood on first day of collection was 48 and median collection yield was 7.27 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg (range, 0.32 to 39.6 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg) after a mean of 1.6 apheresis collections. Overall, 83% of patients achieved the mobilization target, and 95% reached the minimum necessary CD34⁺ cell yield to proceed with transplantation (2 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg). Because FIL is weight-based and dosed daily, the cost comparison with PEG is influenced by patient weight and number of apheresis sessions required. A cost simulation using actual patient data indicates that PEG is associated with lower cost than FIL for the majority of patients. Autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization with PEG and plerixafor is practical, effective, and not associated with increased cost compared with FIL mobilization.

A phase II/III randomized, multicenter trial of prednisone/sirolimus versus prednisone/ sirolimus/calcineurin inhibitor for the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease: BMT CTN 0801

Initial therapy of chronic graft-versus-host disease is prednisone ± a calcineurin-inhibitor, but most patients respond inadequately. In a randomized, adaptive, phase II/III, multicenter trial we studied whether prednisone/sirolimus or prednisone/sirolimus/photopheresis was more effective than prednisone/sirolimus/calcineurin-inhibitor for treating chronic graft-versus-host disease in treatment-naïve or early inadequate responders. Primary endpoints of this study were proportions of subjects alive without relapse or secondary therapy with 6-month complete or partial response in phase II, or with 2-year complete response in phase III. The prednisone/sirolimus/photopheresis arm closed prematurely because of slow accrual and the remaining two-drug versus three-drug study ended in phase II due to statistical futility with 138 evaluable subjects. The two-drug and three-drug arms did not differ in rates of 6-month complete or partial response (48.6% versus 50.0%, P=0.87), or 2-year complete response (14.7% versus 15.5%, P=0.90). Serum creatinine values >1.5 times baseline were less frequent in the calcineurin-inhibitor-free arm at 2 months (1.5% versus 11.7%, P=0.025) and 6 months (7.8% versus 24.0%, P=0.016). Higher adjusted Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary and Physical Functioning scores were seen in the two-drug arm at both 2 months (P=0.02 and P=0.04, respectively) and 6 months (P=0.007 and P=0.001, respectively). Failure-free survival and overall survival rates at 2 years were similar for patients in the the two-drug and three-drug arms (48.6% versus 46.2%, P=0.78; 81.5% versus 74%, P=0.28). Based on similar long-term outcomes, prednisone/sirolimus is a therapeutic alternative to prednisone/sirolimus/calcineurin-inhibitor for chronic graft-versus-host disease, being easier to administer and better tolerated. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01106833.