Potential benefits of early addition of rosiglitazone in combination with glimepiride in the treatment of type 2 diabetes

AIM

To assess the efficacy and tolerability of early combination therapy with rosiglitazone (RSG) and glimepiride (GLIM) vs. GLIM monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

Strategies for the addition of RSG in combination with GLIM were evaluated with data from two randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled studies. Study A - addition of RSG (4 or 8 mg) or PBO to continued GLIM 3 mg once daily; study B - addition of low-dose RSG (4 mg) prior to uptitration of GLIM (from 2 to 4 mg) vs. continued uptitration of GLIM (from 2 to 8 mg).

RESULTS

Study A reported significant reductions in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline to week 26 with the addition of both 4 and 8 mg RSG to GLIM 3 mg [-21 mg/dl (-1.2 mmol/l), p = 0.0019 and -43 mg/dl (-2.4 mmol/l), p < 0.0001, respectively] and in haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) (-0.63%, p = 0.00015 and -1.17%, p < 0.0001, respectively) from a baseline of 8.2 and 8.1%, respectively. At the end of the study, target HbA(1c) <7.0% was achieved in 43 and 68% of patients in the RSG 4 mg + GLIM and RSG 8 mg + GLIM groups, respectively, compared with 32% in the PBO + GLIM (GLIM alone) group. In study B, addition of RSG to GLIM reduced mean FPG and HbA(1c) levels at week 24 from baseline [-28 mg/dl (-1.5 mmol/l), p < 0.0001, and -0.68%, p < 0.0001, respectively]. There were no significant changes with GLIM monotherapy in either study. Favourable effects of RSG + GLIM on insulin sensitivity, beta-cell function and cardiovascular disease biomarkers were also observed. All treatments were similarly well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Early addition of RSG to GLIM is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option to improve glycaemic control in sulphonylurea-treated patients with T2DM.

First-line antihypertensive treatment in patients with pre-diabetes: rationale, design and baseline results of the ADaPT investigation

BACKGROUND

Recent clinical trials reported conflicting results on the reduction of new-onset diabetes using RAS blocking agents. Therefore the role of these agents in preventing diabetes is still not well defined. Ramipril is an ACE inhibitor (ACEi), that has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events in high risk patients and post-hoc analyses of the HOPE trial have provided evidence for its beneficial action in the prevention of diabetes.

METHODS

The ADaPT investigation ("ACE inhibitor-based versus diuretic-based antihypertensive primary treatment in patients with pre-diabetes") is a 4-year open, prospective, parallel group phase IV study. It compares an antihypertensive treatment regimen based on ramipril versus a treatment based on diuretics or betablockers. The primary evaluation criterion is the first manifestation of type 2 diabetes. The study is conducted in primary care to allow the broadest possible application of its results. The present article provides an outline of the rationale, the design and baseline characteristics of AdaPT and compares these to previous studies including ASCOT-BLPA, VALUE and DREAM.

RESULTS

Until March 2006 a total of 2,015 patients in 150 general practices (general physicians and internists) throughout Germany were enrolled. The average age of patients enrolled was 67.1 +/- 10.3 years, with 47% being male and a BMI of 29.9 +/- 5.0 kg/m2. Dyslipidemia was present in 56.5%. 37.8% reported a family history of diabetes, 57.8% were previously diagnosed with hypertension (usually long standing). The HbA1c value at baseline was 5.6 %. Compared to the DREAM study patients were older, had more frequently hypertension and patients with cardiovascular disease were not excluded.

CONCLUSION

Comparing the ADaPT design and baseline data to previous randomized controlled trial it can be acknowledged that AdaPT included patients with a high risk for diabetes development. Results are expected to be available in 2010. Data will be highly valuable for clinical practice due to the observational study design.

Raising diabetes awareness in the public domain

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic, debilitating and costly disease associated with severe complications, and has been recognised as such by the United Nations (UN). But despite being a leading cause of death and serious disability worldwide, the public often perceive T2DM as a relatively mild condition. Furthermore, many people do not know that T2DM is preventable and that steps can be taken to minimise the risk of developing the disease. Improved public awareness of T2DM and its link with obesity and physical inactivity is critical, not only to prevention but also management of diabetes. Recognising this need, the UN has issued a resolution calling on member states to observe World Diabetes Day and implement education and mass media initiatives to raise public awareness of diabetes and its complications. This article reviews selected local, national and international public awareness campaigns to illustrate the range of initiatives that together can work towards the goals of the UN Resolution. By building understanding of diabetes, changing beliefs and attitudes and promoting positive behaviours, such initiatives can help combat the global diabetes epidemic and improve the health and wellbeing of people.

InDuo, a novel combined insulin injection and blood glucose monitoring device - effective and save as other devices, and patient preference

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Frequent blood glucose (BG) monitoring and insulin administration are necessary in intensive insulin regimes. A new integrated system, InDuo is a compact and portable combined insulin doser and BG monitor, designed to overcome some of the limitations of current insulin therapy. The aim of the study was to compare InDuo and a non-integrated system (HumaPen Ergo and Accu-Chek Sensor Meter) for efficacy and safety, and to evaluate patients preference.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The trial design was a multicentre, randomised, 12-week, open-label, comparative, two period crossover. One hundred and ten patients with diabetes, treated with a basal bolus regime, were included. The subjects were assigned to use either InDuo or the non-integrated system. After six weeks of treatment, the subjects were transferred to the alternative system. To assess efficacy, fasting plasma glucose (FBG), 7-point blood glucose profile, serum fructosamine and HbA1c were measured. Serum fructosamine and FBG were measured at baseline and at six and 12 weeks; HbA1c was measured at baseline and week 12. Safety endpoints were number and severity of hypoglycaemic episodes, adverse events and adverse device effects. Patient preference was assessed by a comparative device questionnaire at 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Analysis with an ANOVA mixed model showed no difference after each treatment between serum fructosamine or between FBG levels. HbA1c decreased during the trial from 7.5 % +/- 1.2 to 7.1 % +/- 0.8 at 12 weeks. The safety profiles were similar for both treatments for hypoglycaemic episodes. The incidence of adverse events was also similar. There were 10 adverse device effects reported: eight for the Innovo device in the InDuo, one for the InDuo device and one for the Accu-Chek Sensor Meter. The comparative device questionnaire at 12 weeks showed patients strongly preferred InDuo to HumaPen Ergo and Accu-Chek Sensor Meter (all p < 0.0001). Of those preferring InDuo, more than 60 % classified their choice as very or extremely strong. Both memory functions in InDuo(R) (i. e., for insulin dosage and for blood glucose readings) were used by more than 70 % of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with the InDuo system was as effective and safe as treatment with the non-integrated system. Almost 75 % preferred using InDuo to the non-integrated HumanPen Ergo and Accu-Chek Sensor Meter.

Impact of rosiglitazone on beta-cell function, insulin resistance, and adiponectin concentrations: results from a double-blind oral combination study with glimepiride

Addition of rosiglitazone to sulfonylurea has been shown to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes previously treated with sulfonylurea monotherapy alone. This investigation was performed to assess the specific impact of rosiglitazone on insulin resistance, beta-cell function, cardiovascular risk markers, and adiponectin secretion in this treatment concept. One hundred two patients from a double-blind, 3-arm comparator trial (group 0, glimepiride + placebo, n = 30; group 4, glimepiride + 4 mg rosiglitazone, n = 31; group 8, glimepiride + 8 mg rosiglitazone, n = 41; 48 women, 54 men; age [mean +/- SD], 62.8 +/- 9.1 years; body mass index, 28.7 +/- 4.5 kg/m2; diabetes duration, 6.4 +/- 4.8 years; HbA1c, 8.1% +/- 1.5%) were analyzed after 0 and 16 weeks of treatment. Observation parameters were HbA1c, glucose, homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance score, insulin, intact proinsulin, and adiponectin. Insulin resistance was defined by elevated intact proinsulin values or homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance score of more than 2. All parameters were comparable in the 3 groups at baseline. Substantial and significant dose-dependent improvements were observed after addition of rosiglitazone for fasting glucose (group 0, -9 +/- 48 mg/dL; group 4, -38 +/- 47 mg/dL; group 8, -46 +/- 53 mg/dL), HbA1c (-0.1% +/- 0.7%, -1.1% +/- 1.2%, -1.3% +/- 1.2%), insulin (1.4 +/- 6.2, -1.2 +/- 5.3, -3.7 +/- 9.9 microU/mL), intact proinsulin (1.6 +/- 7.1, -2.0 +/- 4.6, -3.1 +/- 6.1 pmol/L), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (0.2 +/- 2.6, -1.7 +/- 3.5, -2.1 +/- 3.5 mg/L). After adjustment for changes in body weight, significant increases in adiponectin were detected with rosiglitazone, whereas glimepiride alone did not induce a comparable effect (-0.5 +/- 5.8, 8.8 +/- 22.9, 14.3 +/- 19.9 mg/L). The number of insulin-resistant patients decreased in both rosiglitazone treatment groups, whereas no change was seen with glimepiride alone. Next to the reported effects on glucose control, rosiglitazone provided an additional beneficial effect on insulin resistance, beta-cell function, and cardiovascular risk markers. In conclusion, our short-term investigation of rosiglitazone action provides further experimental support for the rationale of combining rosiglitazone with sulfonylurea drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Intense cholesterol lowering therapy with a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor does not improve nitric oxide dependent endothelial function in type-2-diabetes--a multicenter, randomised, double-blind, three-arm placebo-controlled clinical trial

Disturbances in nitric oxide (NO) metabolism resulting in endothelial dysfunction play a central role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemia and in individuals with type 2 diabetes. It is unclear whether lipid lowering therapy with HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitors might improve endothelial function in subjects with type 2 diabetes as it is demonstrated in non-diabetic subjects with hypercholesterolemia. We examined the influence of 0.2 mg and 0.8 mg cerivastatin on endothelial function in a multicenter, randomised, double-blind, and three-arm placebo-controlled clinical trial. Endothelial function was assessed by nitric oxide-dependent flow mediated vasodilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery. A total of 103 patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled in the study. Bayer Company undertook a voluntary action to withdraw cerivastatin from market, therefore the study was terminated earlier. At this point 77 patients were randomised, of which 58 completed the study (mean age 60 +/- 8 years, HbA1c 7.4 +/- 0.9 %). At baseline mean FMD was disturbed in all three therapy arms (5.18 +/- 2.31 % in the placebo group, 3.88 +/- 1.68 in the 0.2-mg cerivastation group, and 4.86 +/- 2.25 in the 0.8-mg cerivastatin group). Despite a significant reduction in cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol-levels after 12 weeks of treatment (decrease in LDL-cholesterol - 26.8 +/- 13.9 % in the 0.2-mg group and - 40.3 +/- 16.0 % in the 0.8-mg group, p = 0.0001, ANCOVA) there was no difference in flow mediated vasodilatation (p = 0.52 and p = 0.56 vs. placebo, respectively, ANCOVA). HbA1c, CRP, and HDL-cholesterol did not change during the study. Furthermore no difference in safety profile between cerivastatin and placebo was found. Despite a significant improvement in lipid profile under statin therapy, no improvement of endothelial dysfunction in terms of nitric oxide bioavailability could be detected.

The effects of skin temperature and testing site on blood glucose measurements taken by a modern blood glucose monitoring device

BACKGROUND

Modern blood glucose (BG) monitoring devices (e.g., InDuo [LifeScan, Inc., Milpitas, CA]) require very low blood volumes, allowing for testing at sites other than the traditional fingertip, but the reliability of such testing has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this randomized study was to compare the effects of cold/warm skin temperature combined with alternative site (forearm) testing versus conventional fingertip measurements on fasting and postprandial conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study population consisted of 19 patients who had previously used InDuo for 6 weeks. Four simultaneous (within 1 min) BG readings (left and right forearm and fingertips) were obtained from each patient 15, 10, and 5 min before eating. Ten minutes before eating, the patient immersed one arm in cold water (15.5 degrees C) and the other in warm water (35 degrees C). At time 0 min arms were removed from water baths, and the patient was offered a standard meal (duration 15 min). Arms were again immersed in water baths, and BG was measured from the same locations 20 min after eating and at subsequent 15-min intervals for 185 min. The effects of site testing and temperature were assessed in this period by identifying maximum BG concentrations (C (max)) and time to C (max) (T (max)).

RESULTS

Significantly lower Cmax values were observed for (1) cold forearm versus cold fingertip (mean Delta 28.6 mg/dL, P < 0.001), (2) warm forearm versus warm fingertip (mean Delta 12 mg/dL, P = 0.028), (3) cold fingertip versus warm fingertip (mean Delta 17.2 mg/dL, P = 0.002), and (4) cold forearm versus warm forearm (mean Delta 33.7 mg/dL, P < 0.001). Significantly longer Tmax values were reported for cold forearm versus warm forearm (mean Delta 22.4 min, P < 0.001) and cold forearm versus cold fingertip (mean Delta 20 min, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that cold skin and forearm conditions significantly underestimate BG concentrations and delay T(max) compared with warm skin and fingertip measurements.