Aortic remodelling following the treatment and regression of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

BACKGROUND

Increased arterial stiffness independently predicts adverse prognosis. While different antihypertensive strategies produce different magnitudes of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) regression, there are no comparative data on how these strategies affect arterial stiffness. The aim was to determine the longitudinal change in aortic stiffness following the treatment of essential hypertension with two mechanistically different antihypertensive treatment strategies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-two patients with essential hypertension and CMR confirmed with LVH were randomly assigned to antihypertensive regimes for 6 months. Treatment strategies were designed either to inhibit the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) (valsartan and moxonidine, group VM) or to have neutral effect on these systems (bendroflumethiazide and amlodipine, group BA). Both treatment groups underwent identical baseline and a 6-month follow-up CMR and were compared with a healthy age-matched control group. Baseline aortic distensibility (AD) was lower in both hypertensive groups compared with controls (2.8 × 10(-3 )mmHg(-1) in group VM (p = 0.001) and 3.3 × 10(-3 )mmHg(-1) group BA (p = 0.039) compared with 4.5 × 10(-3 )mmHg(-1) in the control group). AD increased after antihypertensive therapy (VM: 2.8 × 10(-3 )mmHg(-1)-4.2 × 10(-3 )mmHg(-1) (p = 0.001); BA 3.3 × 10(-3 )mmHg(-1)-4.6 × 10(-3 )mmHg(-1) (p < 0.01)). In both treatment groups AD returned to a level comparable with the normal control group (p = 0.81) after 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with essential hypertension and LVH, AD was lower than in matched normal controls. Despite the opposing pharmacological mechanisms utilised across the treatment groups, the improvement in AD was similar, suggesting that blood pressure reduction per se may be more important than RAAS and SNS inhibition for the improvement of aortic remodelling.

Common carotid intima media thickness and ankle-brachial pressure index correlate with local but not global atheroma burden: a cross sectional study using whole body magnetic resonance angiography

Background

Common carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) and ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) are used as surrogate marker of atherosclerosis, and have been shown to correlate with arterial stiffness, however their correlation with global atherosclerotic burden has not been previously assessed. We compare CIMT and ABPI with atheroma burden as measured by whole body magnetic resonance angiography (WB-MRA).

Methods

50 patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease were recruited. CIMT was measured using ultrasound while rest and exercise ABPI were performed. WB-MRA was performed in a 1.5T MRI scanner using 4 volume acquisitions with a divided dose of intravenous gadolinium gadoterate meglumine (Dotarem, Guerbet, FR). The WB-MRA data was divided into 31 anatomical arterial segments with each scored according to degree of luminal narrowing: 0 = normal, 1 = <50%, 2 = 50–70%, 3 = 70–99%, 4 = vessel occlusion. The segment scores were summed and from this a standardized atheroma score was calculated.

Results

The atherosclerotic burden was high with a standardised atheroma score of 39.5±11. Common CIMT showed a positive correlation with the whole body atheroma score (β 0.32, p = 0.045), however this was due to its strong correlation with the neck and thoracic segments (β 0.42 p = 0.01) with no correlation with the rest of the body. ABPI correlated with the whole body atheroma score (β −0.39, p = 0.012), which was due to a strong correlation with the ilio-femoral vessels with no correlation with the thoracic or neck vessels. On multiple linear regression, no correlation between CIMT and global atheroma burden was present (β 0.13 p = 0.45), while the correlation between ABPI and atheroma burden persisted (β −0.45 p = 0.005).

Conclusion

ABPI but not CIMT correlates with global atheroma burden as measured by whole body contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in a population with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. However this is primarily due to a strong correlation with ilio-femoral atheroma burden.

High-potency statin and ezetimibe use and mortality in survivors of an acute myocardial infarction: a population-based study

OBJECTIVE

To determine all-cause mortality in patients with a first myocardial infarct who were treated with simvastatin compared with high-potency statin and simvastatin/ezetimibe combination.

BACKGROUND

Despite statin use, residual cardiovascular risk remains. Therapeutic options include more potent statins or addition of ezetimibe. There is no clinical outcome data on the use of ezetimibe in such patients.

METHODS

Retrospective longitudinal study using the United Kingdom General Practice Research Database. Patients who had survived 30 days after their first acute myocardial infarct (AMI), had not received prior statin or ezetimibe therapy and were started on a statin within 30 days of AMI were included. Three groups were identified according to their follow-up: (i) simvastatin monotherapy; (ii) high-potency statin group (patients who started on simvastatin and switched to atorvastatin or rosuvastatin); and (iii) ezetimibe/statin combination group (patients who received ezetimibe in addition to statin).

RESULTS

9597 patients (57% male, mean age of 65 ± 13 years) matched study criteria: simvastatin (n=6990 (72.8%)); high-potency statin (n=1883, (19.6%)); and ezetimibe/statin combination (n=724 (7.5%)). During a mean follow-up of 3.2 years, there were 1134 (12%) deaths. In the multivariate proportional hazards model, the adjusted HR for high-potency statin and ezetimibe group were 0.72 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.88, p<0.001) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.43, p=0.85), respectively. A similar result was also obtained in the propensity score analysis that took into account covariates that predicted drug treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients switched to a high-potency statin had a significantly reduced mortality compared with simvastatin monotherapy. There was no observed mortality benefit in the ezetimibe group.

Vitamin D therapy to reduce blood pressure and left ventricular hypertrophy in resistant hypertension: randomized, controlled trial

Low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are associated with higher prevalent blood pressure. We tested whether high-dose intermittent oral vitamin D therapy could reduce blood pressure and left ventricular mass in patients with hypertension resistant to conventional treatment. We conducted a parallel-group, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. Patients with supine office blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg on ≥3 antihypertensive agents received 100 000 U oral vitamin D3 or matching placebo every 2 months. Office and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure, glucose, and cholesterol were measured at baseline, 2, 4, and 6 months; left ventricular mass index was measured by cardiac MRI on a subgroup at baseline and 6 months. The primary outcome was mean 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure at 6 months. A total of 68 participants were randomized, 34 in each group. Mean age was 63 (SD 11) years, mean baseline office blood pressure was 154/84 (13/10) mm Hg, and mean baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D level was 42 (16) nmol/L. Treatment with vitamin D did not reduce 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (adjusted treatment effects: systolic, +3 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -4 to +11; P=0.33; diastolic, -2 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -6 to +2; P=0.29); similar results were seen for office blood pressure. Left ventricular mass index was measured in a subgroup (n=25); no reduction was seen with vitamin D treatment (adjusted treatment effect, +4 g/m(2); 95% confidence interval, 0 to +7; P=0.04). There was no significant change in cholesterol or glucose levels. Thus, 6 months of intermittent, high-dose oral vitamin D3 did not reduce blood pressure or left ventricular mass in patients with resistant hypertension.

The role of aldosterone in heart failure and the clinical benefits of aldosterone blockade

Aldosterone has a variety of detrimental effects on the heart and vasculature and is increasingly recognized as an important target in chronic heart failure, as illustrated by the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study. In this article, the evidence supporting the cardiovascular effects of aldosterone in humans and the proven benefits of aldosterone-receptor antagonists in heart failure shall be discussed.

Cholecalciferol treatment to reduce blood pressure in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension: the VitDISH randomized controlled trial

IMPORTANCE

Observational data link low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels to both prevalent blood pressure and incident hypertension. No clinical trial has yet examined the effect of vitamin D supplementation in isolated systolic hypertension, the most common pattern of hypertension in older people.

OBJECTIVE

To test whether high-dose, intermittent cholecalciferol supplementation lowers blood pressure in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension.

DESIGN

Parallel group, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial.

SETTING

Primary care clinics and hospital clinics.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients 70 years and older with isolated systolic hypertension (supine systolic blood pressure >140 mm Hg and supine diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg) and baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels less than 30 ng/mL were randomized into the trial from June 1, 2009, through May 31, 2011.

INTERVENTIONS

A total of 100,000 U of oral cholecalciferol or matching placebo every 3 months for 1 year.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Difference in office blood pressure, 24-hour blood pressure, arterial stiffness, endothelial function, cholesterol level, insulin resistance, and b-type natriuretic peptide level during 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 159 participants were randomized (mean age, 77 years). Mean baseline office systolic blood pressure was 163/78 mm Hg. Mean baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D level was 18 ng/mL. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D levels increased in the treatment group compared with the placebo group (+8 ng/mL at 1 year, P < .001). No significant treatment effect was seen for mean (95% CI) office blood pressure (−1 [−6 to 4]/−2 [−4 to 1] mm Hg at 3 months and 1 [−2 to 4]/0 [−2 to 2] mm Hg overall treatment effect). No significant treatment effect was evident for any of the secondary outcomes (24-hour blood pressure, arterial stiffness, endothelial function, cholesterol level, glucose level, and walking distance). There was no excess of adverse events in the treatment group, and the total number of falls was nonsignificantly lower in the group receiving vitamin D (36 vs 46, P = .24).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Vitamin D supplementation did not improve blood pressure or markers of vascular health in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN92186858.

Effect of spironolactone on physical performance in older people with self-reported physical disability

BACKGROUND

Interventions that improve muscle function may slow decline in physical function and disability in later life. Recent evidence suggests that inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system may maintain muscle function. We evaluated the effect of aldosterone blockade on physical performance in functionally impaired older people without heart failure.

METHODS

In this parallel-group, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, community-dwelling participants aged ≥65 years with self-reported problems with activities of daily living were randomized to receive 25 mg spironolactone or identical placebo daily for 20 weeks. The primary outcome was change in 6-minute walking distance over 20 weeks. Secondary outcomes were changes in Timed Up and Go test, Incremental Shuttle Walk Test, Functional Limitation Profile, EuroQol EQ-5D, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale over 20 weeks.

RESULTS

Participants' mean (standard deviation) age was 75 (6) years. Of the 93% of participants (112/120) who completed the study, 106 remained on medication at 20 weeks. There was no significant difference in change in 6-minute walking distance at 20 weeks between the spironolactone and placebo groups (mean change, -3.2 m; 95% confidence interval, -28.9 to 22.5; P = .81). Quality of life improved significantly at 20 weeks, with an increase in EuroQol EQ-5D score of 0.10 (95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.18; P < .01) in the spironolactone group relative to the placebo group. There were no significant differences in between-group change for other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Spironolactone was well tolerated but did not improve physical function in older people without heart failure. Quality of life improved significantly, and the possible mechanisms for this require further study.

Aortic valvular heart disease: Is there a place for angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors?

Aortic valve disease (AVD) is the most common form of valvular heart disease in the western world. The only proven therapy for severe AVD is open aortic valve replacement, with trans-catheter aortic valve implantation emerging as a promising modality to treat severe aortic stenosis in a selected group of patients. AVD has a long asymptomatic phase with symptoms occurring late in the disease and once symptoms develop, prognosis is poor. There is a growing appreciation that aortic valvular heart disease incorporates a disease process that extends beyond the valve itself leading to an aortic valvular 'heart' disease. The renin-angiotensin system is known to modulate adverse left ventricular remodeling and myocardial fibrosis, which could be caused by increased load caused by the AVD. In this review, the authors explore evidence that suggest that drugs that target the renin-angiotensin system may have a potential therapeutic role in AVD.

High-dose allopurinol reduces left ventricular mass in patients with ischemic heart disease

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to ascertain if high-dose allopurinol regresses left ventricular mass (LVM) in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD).

BACKGROUND

LV hypertrophy (LVH) is common in patients with IHD including normotensive patients. Allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitor, has been shown to reduce LV afterload in IHD and may therefore also regress LVH.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study was conducted in 66 patients with IHD and LVH, comparing 600 mg/day allopurinol versus placebo therapy for 9 months. The primary outcome measure was change in LVM, assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Secondary outcome measures were changes in LV volumes by CMR, changes in endothelial function by flow-mediated dilation (FMD), and arterial stiffness by applanation tonometry.

RESULTS

Compared to placebo, allopurinol significantly reduced LVM (allopurinol -5.2 ± 5.8 g vs. placebo -1.3 ± 4.48 g; p = 0.007) and LVM index (LVMI) (allopurinol -2.2 ± 2.78 g/m(2) vs. placebo -0.53 ± 2.5 g/m(2); p = 0.023). The absolute mean difference between groups for change in LVM and LVMI was -3.89 g (95% confidence interval: -1.1 to -6.7) and -1.67 g/m(2) (95% confidence interval: -0.23 to -3.1), respectively. Allopurinol also reduced LV end-systolic volume (allopurinol -2.81 ± 7.8 mls vs. placebo +1.3 ± 7.22 mls; p = 0.047), improved FMD (allopurinol +0.82 ± 1.8% vs. placebo -0.69 ± 2.8%; p = 0.017) and augmentation index (allopurinol -2.8 ± 5.1% vs. placebo +0.9 ± 7%; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose allopurinol regresses LVH, reduces LV end-systolic volume, and improves endothelial function in patients with IHD and LVH. This raises the possibility that allopurinol might reduce future cardiovascular events and mortality in these patients. (Does a Drug Allopurinol Reduce Heart Muscle Mass and Improve Blood Vessel Function in Patients With Normal Blood Pressure and Stable Angina?; ISRCTN73579730).

Left ventricular hypertrophy in COPD without hypoxemia: the elephant in the room?

BACKGROUND

COPD is associated with significant cardiovascular mortality. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a pivotal cardiovascular risk factor. The prevalence of LVH in COPD is currently unknown.

METHODS

We performed a pilot study of 93 normoxemic patients with COPD and 34 control subjects. Patients underwent echocardiography to measure left ventricular (LV) dimensions, ECG, measurement of serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels, and 24-h BP recording. Spirometry and oxygen saturations were also recorded.

RESULTS

The oxygen saturations of patients with COPD were normal, at 96.5% (95% CI, 96.1%-97.0%), with a mean FEV(1) of 70.0% predicted (95% CI, 65.2%-74.8%). A total of 30.1% of patients with COPD met the echocardiographic criteria for LVH based on LV mass index, with more LVH in female patients than in male patients (43.2% vs 21.4%, P = .02). The LV mass index in patients with COPD was 96.2 g/m(2) (95% CI, 90.1-102.7 g/m(2)) vs 82.9 g/m(2) (95% CI, 75.8-90.6 g/m(2)) in control subjects ( P = .017). The LV mass index remained high in patients with COPD in the absence of a hypertension history (94.5 g/m(2) vs 79.9 g/m(2), P = .015) and with 24-h systolic BP <135 mm Hg (96.7 g/m(2) vs 82.5 g/m(2), P = .024). The LV ejection fraction (mean = 63.4%) and BNP (mean = 28.7 pg/mL) were normal in patients with COPD. The mean 24-h BP was normal in patients with COPD, at 125/72 mm Hg. ECG was less sensitive for detecting LVH than was echocardiography.

CONCLUSION

LVH with normal LV ejection fraction and BNP levels was present in a significant proportion of normotensive, normoxemic patients with COPD, especially female patients. Clinical trials are, therefore, indicated to evaluate treatments to regress LVH in patients with COPD.

Targeting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in heart failure

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is a well-established therapeutic target in the treatment of heart failure (HF). Substantial advances have been made with existing agents--angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II-receptor blockers (ARBs), and mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists (MRAs)--and new data continue to emerge. The indication for the use of MRAs has been broadened to include potentially all patients who have HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and ACE inhibitors might have a novel application in patients who are at risk of left ventricular dysfunction (those with aortic valvular disease or pacing-induced heart disease). ARBs have been shown to be a beneficial alternative to ACE inhibitors in HFrEF, but their value when added to ACE inhibitors has been questioned. Upstream, direct renin blockade with aliskiren is being pursued in two large trials of HF, despite the premature halting of a third study. A substantial, unmet need remains in patients who have HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). New data on spironolactone and LCZ696 (a combined ARB and neprilysin inhibitor) show promise for these patients. Results of the TOPCAT study of spironolactone in patients with HFpEF are awaited, and LCZ696 is now being tested in a large trial in patients with HFrEF.

The effect of vitamin D replacement on markers of vascular health in stroke patients - a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Low vitamin D levels are associated with increased incidence of future cardiovascular events and are common in stroke patients. We tested whether vitamin D supplementation could reduce blood pressure and improve markers of vascular health in patients who had previously suffered a stroke.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Community-dwelling patients with a history of stroke and baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels <75 nmol/L received 100,000 units of oral vitamin D2 or placebo at baseline. Office and 24 h blood pressure, endothelial function measured by flow-mediated dilatation of the brachial artery, cholesterol, oxidised low density lipoprotein, B-type natriuretic peptide and heart rate turbulence were measured at baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks. 58 patients were randomised. Mean age was 67 years, mean baseline blood pressure 128/72 mmHg, mean baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D level was 38 nmol/L. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were higher in the intervention group at 8 weeks compared to placebo (54 vs 42 nmol/L, P = 0.002) and remained higher at 16 weeks. Office systolic and diastolic blood pressure showed no significant change between groups at 8 weeks (systolic 126.1 vs 131.3 mmHg; adjusted P = 0.97); (diastolic 73.1 vs 74.9 mmHg, adjusted P = 0.15). Flow mediated dilatation was significantly higher in the intervention group at 8 weeks (6.9% vs 3.7%, adjusted P = 0.007) but was not significantly different at 16 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

High dose oral vitamin D supplementation did not improve blood pressure but produced short-term improvement in endothelial function in stroke patients with well-controlled baseline blood pressure.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

ISRCTN28737567.