Usefulness of breast-conserving surgery using the round block technique or modified round block technique in Japanese females

BACKGROUND

The round block technique (RBT) is an oncoplastic technique in which only the perimamillary scars remain visible. We have performed RBT in cases that require resection of the breast tissue under the nipple-areola complex (NAC) and a modified round block technique (MRBT) in peripheral cases in which performing resection of the breast tissue under the NAC is unnecessary. We herein report the usefulness of these techniques.

METHODS

The study participants consisted of 18 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) using MRBT or RBT between July 2010 and July 2011. In the cases using RBT, de-epithelialization between the outer and inner incision lines was performed and the dermis was cut at the side of the tumor location. For MRBT cases, the dermis was cut in all parts of the inner and outer circles, and the skin between the inner and outer incision lines was resected.

RESULTS

Cosmetic results were found to be excellent in three cases, good in eight cases, fair in five cases, and poor in two cases. In this study, the cosmetic results were unacceptable (fair and poor) in patients who underwent ≥25% resection or in whom the resected area was part of the lower portion of the breast.

CONCLUSION

These techniques are useful for performing BCS in the upper portion of the breast. However, if the excision volume is >20% or excision of part of the lower portion of the breast is required, other procedures should be considered.

Should we abandon wire-guided localization for nonpalpable breast cancer? A plea for wire-guided localization

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To evaluate wire-guided localization for nonpalpable breast cancer regarding procedure and surgery-related outcome in a nonteaching community hospital in the Netherlands.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A consecutive series of 117 patients who were treated with breast-conserving surgery after wire-guided localization for nonpalpable breast cancer between January 2006 and December 2010 was retrospectively analyzed. The patients' digital records were reviewed for patient, radiological, histological, and surgical characteristics. In order to quantify the excess resected tissue, a calculated resection ratio was determined by dividing the total resection volume by the optimal resection volume. The optimal resection volume was defined as a spherical tumor volume with an added 1.0 cm margin. The total resection volume was defined as the corresponding ellipsoid.

RESULTS

There were no procedure-related complications. There were two postoperative hemorrhages. Margins were clear in 92.3% of the cases after the first surgical procedure. Eight (6.8%) patients required two operations and one (0.9%) patient required three operations in order to obtain negative margins. Breast conservation was possible in 113 (96.6%) patients. The median calculated resection ratio was 1.87 (range 0.47-14.92).

CONCLUSIONS

This study proves that it is possible to obtain excellent results performing breast-conserving surgery for nonpalpable breast cancer regarding margin status, total amount of operations, and the ratio between tumor and resected tissue volume using wire-guided localization as a localization tool.

The relative benefits of tamoxifen in older women with T1 early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy

Small, hormone receptor-positive breast carcinomas in older women are associated with low local recurrence rates. The relative benefits of adjuvant hormonal therapy remain unclear in elderly women with small, node-negative breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy. From our institutional data base, 224 patients ≥65 years of age with T1N0M0 breast cancer treated with BCS+RT were identified. Of these, 102 patients (45.5%) received tamoxifen (TAM) and 122 patients (54.5%) did not (no-TAM). The median follow-up time was 62.6 months. The 10-year local relapse-free survival (LRFS) was 98% in both the TAM and no-TAM cohorts (p = 0.58); the 10-year DMFS was 83% TAM vs. 89% no-TAM (p = 0.91). There was no difference in 10-year contralateral breast relapse or overall survival (OS) between the two cohorts. In univariate and multivariate analysis, use of TAM was not associated with LRFS, distant metastases-free survival (DMFS), OS, or a reduction in contralateral breast cancers when compared with the no-TAM cohort. In this large cohort of T1N0 elderly breast cancer patients treated with CS+RT, the use of TAM did not appear to decrease ipsilateral breast relapse, contralateral breast relapse, distant metastasis, or OS.

Factors influencing the quality of local management of ductal carcinoma in situ: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend radiotherapy (rt) after breast-conserving surgery (bcs) for optimal control of ductal carcinoma in situ (dcis). The aim of the present study was to characterize the rates of rt consideration and administration, and to identify factors influencing those rates in a cohort of women diagnosed between 1998 and 2005 in Quebec.

METHODS

Quebec's medical service claims and discharge abstract database were used. Using consultation for rt as an indicator for rt consideration, odds ratios (ors) and 95% confidence intervals (cis) were estimated using a generalized estimating equations regression model.

RESULTS

Of 4139 women analyzed (mean age: 58 years), 3435 (83%) received a consultation for rt, and 3057 of them (89%) proceeded with treatment. The rate of rt consideration increased by 7.1% over the study period, with notable differences in the various age groups. Relative to women 50-69 years of age, the ors for being considered for rt were, respectively, 0.89 (95% ci: 0.71 to 1.12), 0.71 (95% ci: 0.55 to 0.92), and 0.20 (95% ci: 0.14 to 0.31) for women younger than 50, 70-79, and 80 years of age and older. Distance to a designated breast care centre lowered the probability of rt consideration, but the presence of comorbidities did not. A surgeon's volume of bcss increased the probability of being considered for rt by 7% for every 10 such procedures performed (or: 1.07; 95% ci: 1.04 to 1.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Consideration for rt has increased over time. However, older women (despite being in good health) and those living far from a designated breast care centre or having a low-case-volume surgeon were less likely to be considered for rt.

Variation in receipt of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery: assessing the impact of physicians and geographic regions

BACKGROUND

Among older women with early-stage breast cancer, patients with a short life expectancy (LE) are much less likely to benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). Little is known about the impact of physicians and regional factors on the use of RT across LE groups.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative contribution of patient, physician, and regional factors on the use of RT.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SUBJECTS

Women aged 67-94 years diagnosed with stage I breast cancer between 1998 and 2007 receiving breast-conserving surgery.

MEASURES

We evaluated patient, physician, and regional factors for their association with RT across strata of LE using a 3-level hierarchical logistic regression model. Risk-standardized treatment rates (RSTRs) for the receipt of radiation were calculated according to primary surgeon and region.

RESULTS

Approximately 43.6% of the 2253 women with a short LE received RT, compared with 90.8% of the 11,027 women with a long LE. Among women with a short LE, the probability of receiving RT varied substantially across primary surgeons; RSTRs ranged from 27.7% to 67.3% (mean, 43.9%). There was less variability across geographic regions; RSTRs ranged from 42.0% to 45.2% (mean, 43.6%). Short LE patients were more likely to receive RT in areas with high radiation oncologist density (odds ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is a wide variation across geographic regions in the use of RT among women with breast cancer and short LE, the regional variation was substantially diminished after accounting for the operating surgeon.

Isolated ipsilateral nipple recurrence: important lessons to learn

Most breast cancer recurrences occur in the surgical scars or within other quadrants of the same breast. Isolated tumour recurrence occurring in the nipple after breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy is extremely unusual. The reason for this is unknown, but is speculated to be due to involved surgical margins or an occult involvement of the nipple-areolar complex in a breast cancer of the same breast. We present a case of a 44-year-old Indian woman who had recurrent tumour over her right nipple after an ipsilateral breast-conserving surgery that was followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. There was no typical malignancy features from the mammogram. However, histopathological study confirmed a malignant growth that infiltrated into the dermis and the underneath breast tissue. Completion mastectomy was then performed and the patient was later treated with Taxane-based chemotherapy. Nipple recurrence after breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy may be confused with other nipple conditions such as Paget's disease of the breast. Comprehensive assessments, which include mammogram and biopsy, have proved that such recurrence do occur, as presented in this case. This warrants a specific management strategy.

What is an adequate margin for breast-conserving surgery? Surgeon attitudes and correlates

BACKGROUND

Re-excision is common in breast-conserving surgery (BCS), partly due to lack of consensus on margin definitions. A population-based surgeon sample was used to determine current attitudes toward margin width and identify characteristics associated with margin choice.

METHODS

Breast cancer patients treated from 2005 to 2007 were identified from Los Angeles and Detroit Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries. Pathology reports were used to identify their surgeons, who were surveyed (n = 418). Response rate was 74.6% (n = 312). Mean surgeon age was 51.9 years, 17.8% were female, and mean number of years in practice was 18.5.

RESULTS

Wide variation in margin selection was noted among surgeons, and did not differ for invasive cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). In a scenario of T1 invasive cancer, 11% of surgeons endorsed margins of tumor not touching ink (TNTI), 42% of 1-2 mm, 28% of > or =5 mm, and 19% >1 cm as precluding need for re-excision before radiotherapy. On multivariate analysis, having 50% or more of practice devoted to breast cancer independently predicted smaller margin choice (p = 0.03). For a patient with a 1.4-cm grade 2 estrogen receptor (ER)-positive DCIS without radiotherapy (RT) planned, 3% of surgeons chose TNTI, 12% 1-2 mm, 25% > or =5 mm, and 61% >1 cm as sufficient without re-excision. In the scenario of DCIS without RT, breast specialization independently predicted larger margin choice (p = 0.03). Gender and years in practice were not predictive of margin choice.

CONCLUSIONS

Wide variation in BCS margin definition exists. Variation is similar for invasive cancer and DCIS with RT, with more specialized surgeons choosing smaller margins. In DCIS without RT, more specialized surgeons favored larger margins. A standardized margin definition may significantly affect re-excision rates.

Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status

BACKGROUND

The benefit of breast MRI for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients is uncertain. This study characterizes those receiving MRI versus those who did not, and reports on their short-term surgical outcomes, including time to operation, margin status, and mastectomy rate.

STUDY DESIGN

All patients seen in a multidisciplinary breast cancer clinic from July 2004 to December 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were evaluated by a radiologist, a pathologist, and surgical, radiation, and medical oncologists.

RESULTS

Among 577 patients, 130 had pretreatment MRIs. MRI use increased from 2004 (referent, 13%) versus 2005 (24%, p=0.014) and 2006 (27%, p=0.002). Patients having MRIs were younger (52.5 versus 59.0 years, p < 0.001), but its use was not associated with preoperative chemotherapy, family history of breast or ovarian cancer, presentation, or tumor features. MRI was associated with a 22.4-day delay in pretreatment evaluation (p=0.011). Breast conserving therapy (BCT) was attempted in 320 of 419 patients with complete surgical data. The odds ratio for mastectomy, controlling for T size and stage, was 1.80 after MRI versus no MRI (p=0.024). Patients having MRIs did not have fewer positive margins at lumpectomy (21.6% MRI versus 13.8% no MRI, p=0.20), or conversions from BCT to mastectomy (9.8% MRI versus 5.9% no MRI, p=0.35).

CONCLUSIONS

Breast MRI use was not confined to any particular patient group. MRI use was not associated with improved margin status or BCT attempts, but was associated with a treatment delay and increased mastectomy rate. Without evidence of improved oncologic outcomes as a result, our study does not support the routine use of MRI to select patients or facilitate the performance of BCT.

Retracted: Factors affecting hospital readmission rates for breast cancer patients in Western Australia

By this notice, the Editor and the Publisher of the Journal of Surgical Oncology retract from publication the following article: "Factors Affecting Hospital Readmission Rates for Breast Cancer Patients in Western Australia," Michael A. Martin, Ramona Meyricke, Terry O'Neill, and Steven Roberts, Journal of Surgical Oncology, Published online January 17, 2007, DOI: 10.1002/jso.20742. The article has been formally deemed a duplicate submission. The Editor and the Publisher of the Journal of Surgical Oncology regret the occurrence of this unfortunate incident.

Cathepsin-D, urokinase plasminogen activator and type-1 plasminogen activator inhibitor in early breast cancer: an immunohistochemical study of prognostic value and relations to tenascin-C and other factors

Cytosolic determinations of cathepsin-D (cath-D), urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and its specific inhibitor PAI-1 have shown an association with adverse prognosis in breast cancer. Our aim was to study the distribution of these markers in small axillary node-negative breast carcinomas using immunohistochemistry and relate the semiquantitative results to known prognostic factors, the expression of tenascin-C (Tn-C) in invasion border of the tumour and prognosis. All the 158 women (159 tumours) were treated with breast conserving surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. Cytoplasmic immunoreactivity for cath-D was seen in carcinoma cells in 47% and in stromal cells in 44%. Nearly all tumours expressed uPA and PAI-1, which were categorized to cytoplasmic expression in carcinoma cells and diffuse stromal expression and quantified -/+/++/ and further dichotomized for purposes of analysis. Expression of uPA and PAI-1 in stromal fibroblasts was recorded as -/+. Cytoplasmic and stromal cell cath-D contents were associated with grade, proliferation, Tn-C expression in the tumour invasion border and the development of distant metastasis. In multivariate analysis stromal cath-D proved to be an independent prognostic factor for metastasis. Stromal expression of uPA was associated with an increased risk of local recurrence; otherwise high levels of uPA did not associate with other prognostic factors nor with prognosis. Fibroblastic expression of PAI-1 showed an association with both local and distant disease recurrence. However, no consistent association between the immunohistochemically quantified uPA and PAI-1 and prognosis was found. In conclusion, immunohistochemical determination of cath-D seems to be a viable method to predict a higher risk of metastasis but not local recurrence in small axillary node-negative breast carcinomas.