[Postoperative pain control]

Pain was and in part still is a constant feature of surgical practice: before, during and after surgery. To start with painful symptoms represent a fundamental diagnostic element, given that in over 60% of cases pain is the primary indication for surgery. During the operation, pain used to constitute the main impediment to the surgeon's activities, until the introduction of ether and the birth of modern anesthesia. Lastly, the postoperative period is also painful so much so that whereas until fifty years ago patients were above all afraid of the operation, patients nowadays are concerned about the pain during the days after the operation. Moreover, over 50% of patients undergoing surgery are unsatisfied with the treatment of postoperative pain, in spite of the fact that drugs are available which enable us to control it. The authors studied the quality of postoperative analgesia in 357 patients, who received treatment with ketorolac tromethamine 30 mg i.v. on leaving the operating theatre, and subsequently i.m. every 8 hours starting from 3 hours after surgery. The use of ketorolac tromethanine demonstrated effective analgesia and was well accepted by patients, without revealing any particular collateral effects.

Ketorolac. A reappraisal of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in pain management

Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) with strong analgesic activity. The analgesic efficacy of ketorolac has been extensively evaluated in the postoperative setting, in both hospital inpatients and outpatients, and in patients with various other acute pain states. After major abdominal, orthopaedic or gynaecological surgery or ambulatory laparoscopic or gynaecological procedures, ketorolac provides relief from mild to severe pain in the majority of patients and has similar analgesic efficacy to that of standard dosages of morphine and pethidine (meperidine) as well as less frequently used opioids and other NSAIDs. The analgesic effect of ketorolac may be slightly delayed but often persists for longer than that of opioids. Combined therapy with ketorolac and an opioid results in a 25 to 50% reduction in opioid requirements, and in some patients this is accompanied by a concomitant decrease in opioid-induced adverse events, more rapid return to normal gastrointestinal function and shorter stay in hospital. In children undergoing myringotomy, hernia repair, tonsillectomy, or other surgery associated with mild to moderate pain, ketorolac provides comparable analgesia to morphine, pethidine or paracetamol (acetaminophen). In the emergency department, ketorolac attenuates moderate to severe pain in patients with renal colic, migraine headache, musculoskeletal pain or sickle cell crisis and is usually as effective as frequently used opioids, such as morphine and pethidine, and other NSAIDs and analgesics. Subcutaneous administration of ketorolac reduces pain in patients with cancer and seems particularly beneficial in pain resulting from bone metastases. The acquisition cost of ketorolac is greater than that of morphine or pethidine; however, in a small number of studies, the higher cost of ketorolac was offset when treatment with ketorolac resulted in a reduced hospital stay compared with alternative opioid therapy. The tolerability profile of ketorolac parallels that of other NSAIDs; most clinically important adverse events affect the gastrointestinal tract and/or renal or haematological function. The incidence of serious or fatal adverse events reported with ketorolac has decreased since revision of dosage guidelines. Results from a large retrospective postmarketing surveillance study in more than 20,000 patients demonstrated that the overall risk of gastrointestinal or operative site bleeding related to parenteral ketorolac therapy was only slightly higher than with opioids. However, the risk increased markedly when high dosages were used for more than 5 days, especially in the elderly. Acute renal failure may occur after treatment with ketorolac but is usually reversible on drug discontinuation. In common with other NSAIDs, ketorolac has also been implicated in allergic or hypersensitivity reactions. In summary, ketorolac is a strong analgesic with a tolerability profile which resembles that of other NSAIDs. When used in accordance with current dosage guidelines, this drug provides a useful alternative, or adjuvant, to opioids in patients with moderate to severe pain.

Population pharmacodynamic model for ketorolac analgesia

OBJECTIVE

To derive a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model that characterizes the distribution of pain relief scores and remedication times observed in patients receiving intramuscular ketorolac for the treatment of moderate to severe postoperative pain.

BACKGROUND

The data analysis approach deals with the complexities of analyzing analgesic trial data: (1) repeated measurements, (2) ordered categorical response variables, and (3) nonrandom censoring because the patients can take a rescue medication if their pain relief is insufficient.

METHODS

Patients (n = 522) received a single oral or intramuscular administration of placebo or a single intramuscular dose of 10, 30, 60, or 90 mg ketorolac for postoperative pain relief. Pain relief was measured periodically with use of a five-category ordinal scale up to 6 hours after dosing. In this period, 288 patients received additional medication because of insufficient pain relief. Pharmacokinetic data was available for 85 subjects. Models were fitted to the data with the NONMEM program.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetic data was best described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption. Pain relief was found to be a function of drug concentration (Emax model), time (waxing and waning of placebo effect), and an individual random effect. The drug concentration at half-maximal effect (EC50) and the first-order rate constant (keo) half-life for pain relief were 0.37 mg/L and 24 minutes. The probability of remedication was found to be a function of the observed level of pain relief and was found to increase with time. Monte Carlo simulations showed that adequate pain relief was achieved in 50% of the patients at 41, 27, 23, and 21 minutes after 10, 30, 60, or 90 mg of intramuscular ketorolac. Adequate pain relief was maintained up to 6 hours in 50%, 70%, 78%, and 81% of patients after these four doses. Only 25% of the patients achieved adequate pain relief with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for the analgesic efficacy of intramuscular ketorolac was derived. The simulated relationship between dose, time, and percentage of patients with adequate pain relief suggested that 30 mg intramuscular ketorolac was the optimal initial dose for postoperative pain relief.

Recovery after propofol with and without intraoperative fentanyl in patients undergoing ambulatory gynecologic laparoscopy

This prospective, randomized double-blind study was conducted to examine the effect of intraoperative opioid (fentanyl) supplementation on postoperative analgesia, emesis, and recovery in ambulatory patients receiving propofol-nitrous oxide anesthesia. Eighty patients undergoing ambulatory gynecologic laparoscopy participated. Confounding variables that could influence the incidence of postoperative emesis were controlled. Patients received either fentanyl 100 micrograms (Group I) or ketorolac 60 mg (Group II) intravenously (IV) at the time of anesthetic induction. No further analgesic supplements were given intraoperatively. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with propofol-nitrous oxide. Atracurium was used for muscle relaxation and reversed with neostigmine and glycopyrrolate. Postoperative pain during early recovery was treated with IV fentanyl 25-50 micrograms (Group I) or IV ketorolac 15-30 mg (Group II). Subsequent breakthrough pain in both groups was treated with IV fentanyl 25 micrograms increments as needed (rescue analgesia). Eighty-four percent of patients in Group I required analgesics during early recovery versus 56% of patients in Group II (P < 0.05). Maintenance dose of propofol was significantly lower in Group I (129 +/- 35 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 than in Group II (170 +/- 63 micrograms.kg-1.min-1. Immediate recovery (emergence) in the two groups was comparable, despite different propofol requirements. Although the incidence of emetic sequelae in the postanesthesia care unit was not significantly different between the two treatment groups, a significantly larger number of patients in Group I (fentanyl group) had emetic sequelae that required therapeutic intervention (Group I 29% versus Group II 10%). Patients in Group I also took a significantly longer time to ambulate and meet criteria for home discharge. These results indicate that, in patients undergoing ambulatory gynecologic laparoscopy, the practice of administering a small dose of fentanyl at the time of anesthetic induction reduces maintenance propofol requirement, but fails to provide effective postoperative analgesia. Fentanyl administration at anesthetic induction increased the need for rescue antiemetics. The relative severity of emetic sequelae could have contributed to delay in ambulation and discharge.

Cyclic vomiting: association with multiple homeostatic abnormalities and response to ketorolac

Cyclic vomiting is a rare syndrome that over the years has variously been ascribed to psychogenic causes, sensory seizures, abdominal migraine, and more recently, to mechanical or electrical disturbances in gastric physiology. We describe the case of a 65-year-old white diabetic female with a 10-yr history of recurrent episodes of nausea and vomiting, occurring every 10-12 days and lasting approximately 1-3 days at a time. These episodes were accompanied by edema, mild temperature elevations, and remarkable elevations in blood pressure. In between these episodes, the patient remained asymptomatic. Initial screening tests were also negative except for moderate gastroparesis. However, antral motility was found to be normal, as was an electrogastrogram. Detailed neurological and psychiatric evaluations were negative. Trials of erythromycin, metoclopramide, naloxone, ondansetron, and amitryptiline were unsuccessful. Serial endocrinological testing revealed that an episode of vomiting was always preceded by an abnormal elevation in at least one of the following: serum adrenocorticotropic hormone, serum cortisol, or urinary cortisol. In the midst of an episode, all three values were exceedingly high (e.g., > 10-fold increases in 24-hr urinary cortisol levels). Fluctuations of a milder degree, though still abnormally high, were also noted in between cycles at times when the patient was completely asymptomatic. High-dose dexamethasone suppressed these hormonal surges completely but not the clinical symptoms, which continued undisturbed. The patient was finally given a trial of intramuscular ketorolac during one of her episodes, which produced prompt and sustained relief. During the next few weeks, she was given this drug each time her symptoms commenced, and each time it appeared that her cycle had been aborted. She has since been able to terminate her episodes promptly and completely by self-administration of ketorolac. We speculate that her syndrome is caused by a poorly characterized disorder of endogenous prostaglandin release, resulting not only in derangements in the hypothalamic pituitary system but also in nausea and vomiting.

On the protection by ketorolac of reperfusion-induced heart damage

This study shows that the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug, ketorolac, protects against myocardial damage induced by reperfusion. This effect was analyzed after 5 min of coronary occlusion in rat hearts. The results indicate that ketorolac, at a dose of 1 mg/kg, effectively protects the heart against reperfusion arrhythmias. Furthermore, it protects from the release of lactate dehydrogenase and creatine kinase to the plasma. We propose that the protective effect of the drug might be due to its chelating action on calcium ions, thus preventing the overload of such cation in myocardial cells.

Nurse evaluation of a pain medication protocol in a selective postoperative population

Postoperative pain in 33 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy was managed by an intramuscular nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug protocol rather than by administration of narcotics. Patients rated their perception of pain with a visual analog scale on the first postoperative day both before and after receiving ketorolac tromethamine. The medication was effective in relieving pain after this major operation. Costs were approximately one half that of the traditional narcotic protocol used before this study.

The effect of pretreatment with ketorolac on pain during intravenous injection of propofol

A randomised, double-blind, controlled trial was undertaken to compare three different methods of reducing pain during the intravenous injection of propofol. In 101 patients undergoing daycase surgery, verbal rating scores for pain during injection of propofol were compared immediately after intravenous pretreatment with ketorolac 10 mg, lignocaine 10 mg or saline. Neither pain during injection (p = 0.129), nor venous sequelae at 7 days postoperatively were significantly different between the three treatments. Pain during propofol injection remains a confounding clinical problem.

A comparison of ketorolac with flunixin, butorphanol, and oxymorphone in controlling postoperative pain in dogs

Ketorolac tromethamine, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesic, was compared with flunixin and butorphanol for its analgesic efficacy and potential side effects after laparotomy or shoulder arthrotomy in dogs. Sixty-four dogs were randomly assigned to receive butorphanol 0.4 mg/kg body weight (BW) (n = 21), flunixin 1.0 mg/kg BW (n = 21), or ketorolac 0.5 mg/kg BW (n = 22), in a double blind fashion. The analgesic efficacy was rated from 1 to 4 (1 = inadequate, 4 = excellent) for each dog. The average scores after laparotomy were ketorolac, 3.4; flunixin, 2.7; and butorphanol, 1.6. After shoulder arthrotomy, the average scores were ketorolac, 3.5; flunixin, 3.0; and butorphanol, 1.4 (5/11 dogs). As butorphanol was unable to control pain after shoulder arthrotomy, oxymorphone, 0.05 mg/kg BW, replaced butorphanol in a subsequent group of dogs and had a score of 2.0 (6/11 dogs). Serum alanine aminotransferase and creatinine were significantly elevated above baseline at 24 hours postoperatively in dogs receiving flunixin. One dog in each group developed melena or hematochezia. One dog receiving ketorolac had histological evidence of gastric ulceration. We concluded that ketorolac is a good analgesic for postoperative pain in dogs.

Ketorolac vs chlorpromazine in the treatment of acute migraine without aura. A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial

BACKGROUND

Many treatments for acute migraine exist. Chlorpromazine is effective but has serious side effects. Ketorolac has only rare side effects.

OBJECTIVE

To compare intramuscular ketorolac troinethamine with intravenous chlorpromazine hydrochloride in treating acute migraine.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of 60 mg of intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine with 25 mg of intravenous chlorpromazine hydrochloride in patients with acute migraine headache seen in the emergency department. Pain intensity, quantitated using the Wong-Baker Faces Rating Scale, was measured every 30 minutes for 2 hours in the emergency department. Patients returned pain scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours by mail.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were entered into each treatment arm. No differences were seen between the mean pain scores or the mean change in pain scores. The ketorolac group mean (+/- SEM) pain score decreased from 4.07 +/- 0.18 to 0.73 +/- 0.3 in 2 hours. The chlorpromazine group pain score decreased from 4.47 +/- 0.17 to 0.87 +/- 0.4. Two of the 3 nonresponders responded to the alternate group's treatment. No side effects were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Using 60 mg of intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine is as effective as 25 mg of intravenous chlorpromazine hydrochloride in the treatment of acute migraine headache. Patients who do not respond to one of these medications may respond to the other.

Evaluation of ketorolac concentrations in plasma and gingival crevicular fluid following topical treatment with oral rinses and dentifrices

Two clinical studies were conducted to determine the relative amounts of ketorolac detectable locally in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and systemically in plasma after oral, topical drug administration. The rinse study compared topical administration of three concentrations of ketorolac tromethamine (0.1%, 0.5%, and 0.01%) in oral rinse formulations administered topically and a perorally administered capsule (10 mg), and the dentifrice study compared two concentrations of ketorolac in dentifrice formulations (0.15% and 1.0%) with a 0.1% oral rinse, all treatments administered topically. The dose-corrected systemic availability of the three oral rinses evaluated in the rinse study relative to the peroral capsule was about 15%. However, the ratios of the observed maximum GCF ketorolac concentration to maximum plasma ketorolac concentration ranged from 22 to 49, compared to less than 1 for the peroral ketorolac capsule. Using this ratio as an estimate of the ability of a treatment to target the drug to the gingival tissue, these data indicate that the ketorolac oral rinses achieved greater delivery of drug to the gingival tissue (presumed site of action for periodontitis) with a lower systemic drug load than peroral administration of a ketorolac capsule. The dose-corrected relative systemic bioavailabilities for the dentifrice treatments with respect to the 0.1% rinse in the dentifrice study were 59.2% and 86.4% for the 1.0% and 0.15% dentifrices, respectively, indicating that significantly less ketorolac was systemically available from the two dentifrices relative to the oral rinse. The relative bioavailabilities of ketorolac in the GCF after dosing with the dentifrice formulations with respect to the rinse were 89.1% for the 1.0% dentifrice and 19.7% for the 0.15% dentifrice. Thus, the 1.0% dentifrice appears to provide statistically equivalent levels of ketorolac to the gingival tissue as the 0.1% oral rinse with significantly less systemic exposure. The T1/2 of ketorolac in the GCF was about 0.5 h for all three treatments, which is significantly less than the plasma half-life of about 5.3 h. These data suggest that GCF levels of ketorolac should remain above the IC50 for PGE2-stimulated IL-1 bone resorption for about 7 h following treatment, assuming continuation of the first-order elimination observed over the first two postdosing hours. We conclude that oral rinses and dentifrices are effective and preferred vehicles for administration of ketorolac for use in treatment of periodontitis.

Safety of intravenous ketorolac therapy in children and cost savings with a unit dosing system

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of side effects with the short-term use of intravenously administered ketorolac in children and the overall cost savings with a unit dosing system.

STUDY DESIGN

We prospectively examined the incidence of complications arising from the intravenous administration of ketorolac to 1747 children (14,810 doses) during a 3-year, 3-month period and assessed cost savings resulting from dividing 60 mg syringes into 7.5, 15, 30, and 60 mg unit doses. Complications were recorded prospectively into a computerized database. Estimated drug costs to the pharmacy were calculated on the basis of the total numbers of each drug fraction administered, with allowance for 1O% wastage as a result of drug expiration.

RESULTS

Side effects occurring with ketorolac administration were rare. Four patients (0.2%) had hypersensitivity reactions to the drug, two of them possibly on the basis of latex allergy. Two patients (O.1%) had renal complications but were subsequently found to have underlying causes that could account for their renal symptoms. One patient (0.05%) had massive gastrointestinal bleeding in the postoperative period. With fractionation of 60 mg syringes, total drug cost to the pharmacy was $34,786, rather than the $86,639 that would have been spent had a single syringe been used for each dose.

CONCLUSION

Ketorolac proved safe for short-term intravenous use in children more than 1 year of age when patients with known contraindications to the use of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs were excluded. A considerable reduction in drug costs can be achieved with fractionation of premixed syringes into unit doses.

Single-dose intramuscular ketorolac versus diclofenac for pain management in renal colic

A double-blind controlled study was designed to compare the effective- ness of a single intramuscular dose of 60 mg ketorolac with that of 75 mg diclofenac in the treatment of renal colic and to monitor side effects. Fifty-seven patients completed the study, 27 in the ketorolac group and 30 in the diclofenac group. Effectiveness of treatment was monitored by pain relief reported on a 4-point verbal scale at different time points. At 60 minutes 77.8% and 86.6% (P = 0.4) of patients, and at 120 minutes 81.5% and 96.6% (P = .1 5) of patients, reported significant pain relief following ketorolac and diclofenac doses, respectively. Both groups had an equal 92% significant pain relief at discharge from the emergency department. Both drugs were well tolerated by the patients. Ketorolac therefore, seems as effective as diclofenac in the treatment of renal colic.

Contact lens induced conjunctivitis: a model of human ocular inflammation

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the usefulness of contact lens induced conjunctivitis as a model of human ocular inflammation and to evaluate the effect of antiallergic eyedrops on this model.

METHODS

We recruited 40 subjects with contact lens induced conjunctivitis. Half were treated with ketorolac tromethamine (KT), and half with iodoxamide tromethamine (LT). Signs, symptoms, contact lens wearing time, and wearing time until discomfort developed were evaluated at baseline, day 7, and day 14.

RESULTS

The group receiving LT showed improvement of symptoms 7 days after beginning the study (P = 0.016), and both the LT and KT groups showed improvement from baseline on day 14 (P = 0.001 and P = 0.004, respectively). Signs improved for both the KT group (P = 0.011) and the LT group (P = 0.043) on day 7 and day 14 (P = 0.033 and P = 0.007, respectively). Mean contact lens wearing time improved on day 14 for the group treated with KT (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Contact lens induced conjunctivitis appears to be a useful model of human ocular inflammation. Both antiallergics KT and LT improve contact lens tolerance in subjects with contact lens induced conjunctivitis. Two weeks of treatment may be required to demonstrate therapeutic benefits of antiallergic drops.

A comparison of the effect of intramuscular diclofenac, ketorolac or piroxicam on post-operative pain following laparoscopy

Sixty patients presenting for in-patient gynaecological laparoscopic surgery were randomly allocated to receive either diclofenac 75 mg (n = 20), ketorolac 30 mg (n = 20) or piroxicam 20 mg (n = 20) as an intramuscular (i.m.) injection immediately after induction of anaesthesia. Post-operative Visual Analogue Scores at rest, over the first 24 h after surgery, using a 10 cm scale, ranged from 3.2-0.5 in the diclofenac group, 2.7-0.85 in the ketorolac group and 2.8-0.5 in the piroxicam group. The scores did not differ significantly between the three groups (P > 0.05). Mean time (SD) to first analgesia was 27 (94) min in the piroxicam group, 16 (30) min in the diclofenac group and 62 (120) min in the piroxicam group. Six out of 20 patients in the diclofenac group required further analgesia compared with nine out of 20 in the other two drug groups, this was not significant. There were no reports of increased bleeding, bronchoconstriction, bleeding from the upper gastrointestinal tract, renal impairment or pain from the intramuscular (i.m.) injection site in any of the groups. The administration of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug to patients presenting for laparoscopic surgery reduces post-operative pain and analgesic requirements, and piroxicam 20 mg provides a suitable alternative to 75 mg diclofenac and 20 mg ketorolac.

Pain following iliac crest bone grafting of alveolar clefts

The purpose of this study was to investigate pain following iliac crest bone grafting of alveolar clefts. The study involved 34 consecutive patients requiring secondary alveolar bone grafting. The study population consisted of 21 males and 13 females with a mean age of 11 years (SD = 3.4). Twenty-three patients had unilateral and 11 patients bilateral clefts. The patients were treated in a like manner with harvesting of an iliac crest cortico-cancellous block concurrently with the raising of flaps and cleft closure. All surgery was performed by combinations of the authors. Eighteen patients were placed on postoperative intravenous ketorolac and the remainder were not. All patients received patient controlled analgesia at a dose of 0.015 mg/kg of morphine with an 8 min exclusion period before re-dosing. Total narcotic usage averaged 0.18 mg/kg (SD = 0.19) with 31 patients using less than 0.4 mg/kg. Regular ketorolac did not influence narcotic usage, nor did sex, age or nature of the cleft. Thirty-one patients began ambulating on the first postoperative day and 27 were discharged within 2 days of surgery. No long-term donor site morbidity was observed. Our results suggest that pain following iliac crest bone grafting of alveolar clefts is not severe and is readily alleviated with small quantities of analgesic drugs. It would appear that short-term morbidity following these procedures is frequently overstated and is in itself not a valid reason to change to calvarial or mandibular donor sites.

Asthma caused by topical application of ketorolac

BACKGROUND

Ketorolac tromethamine 0.5 percent ophthalmic solution is a widely used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) in ophthalmology. Ketorolac eye drops have not been implicated previously as a cause of NSAID-induced asthma.

STUDY DESIGN

A patient with severe asthma after topical application of ketorolac is described. The current ophthalmic indications for topical application of ketorolac and reported hypersensitivity reactions with systemic use of ketorolac are reviewed.

RESULTS

A 44-year-old woman with chronic asthma, rhinosinusitis, and nasal polyps inadvertently was given ketorolac to be applied topically. After applying the first dose of ketorolac, an exacerbation of her asthma developed, necessitating hospital admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical application of ketorolac is safe in the vast majority of ophthalmology patients. However, NSAID eye drops should not be prescribed for patients with aspirin or NSAID allergy or the combination of asthma and nasal polyps unless the patient is known to tolerate aspirin without trouble.

Preoperative ketorolac increases bleeding after tonsillectomy in children

PURPOSE

To compare the incidence of vomiting following codeine or ketorolac for tonsillectomy in children.

METHODS

We had planned to enrol 240 patients, aged 2-12 yr undergoing elective tonsillectomy into a randomized, single-blind study in University Children's Hospital. The study was terminated, after 64 patients because interim analysis of the data by a blinded non-study scientist concluded that the patients were at undue risk of excessive perioperative bleeding. After induction of anaesthesia by inhalation with N2O/halothane or with propofol 2.5-3.5 mg.kg-1 i.v., the children were administered 150 micrograms.kg-1 ondansetron and 50 micrograms.kg-1 midazolam. Maintenance of anaesthesia was with N2O and halothane in O2. Subjects were administered either 1.5 mg.kg-1 codeine im or 1 mg.kg-1 ketorolac i.v. before the commencement of surgery. Intraoperative blood loss was measured with a Baxter Medi-Vac Universal Critical Measurement Unit. Postoperative management of vomiting and pain was standardized. Vomiting was recorded for 24 hr after anaesthesia. Data were compared with ANOVA, Chi-Square analysis and Fisher Exact Test.

RESULTS

Thirty-five subjects received ketorolac. Demographic data were similar. The incidence of vomiting during the postoperative period was 31% in the codeine-group and 40% in the ketorolac-group. Intraoperative blood losses was 1.3 +/- 0.8 ml.kg-1 after codeine and 2.2 +/- 1.9 ml.kg-1 after ketorolac (mean +/- SD) P < 0.05. Five ketorolac-treated patients had bleeding which led to unscheduled admission to hospital, P < 0.05, Exact Test.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative ketorolac increases perioperative bleeding among children undergoing tonsillectomy without beneficial effects.

The placebo effect in acute headache management: ketorolac, meperidine, and saline in the emergency department

In a prospective, double-blind, randomized study, ketorolac 60 mg, meperidine 50 mg plus promethazine 25 mg, and normal saline given by intramuscular injection were compared as treatment for acute headache crises. Thirty patients (6 men and 24 women) presenting to an urban emergency department with any type of benign headache were randomized into three groups and filled out the McGill Short-Form Pain Questionnaire with a Pain Rating Index and a Visual Analogue Pain scale. They received one of the study medications and repeated the testing after 1 hour. The objective was to test the efficacy of ketorolac in this population. Separate analyses of the McGill Short-Form (Total, Sensory, Affective, and Pain Rating Index scales) and the Visual Analogue Pain scale responses showed that the three treatments produced a significant reduction in pain (P < .0001), but that pain reduction did not differ among the treatments. This profound reduction observed after administration of a placebo prevented accurate evaluation of the effects of ketorolac. The placebo response must be considered in the design of future trials using intramuscular medications in the acute intervention of headache crises. In addition, the use of a standard analgesic is necessary to demonstrate both assay sensitivity and magnitude of response to placebo.

A critical look at ocular allergy drugs

Topical ocular allergy drugs are indicated for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis after more conservative measures have been employed. Antihistamines, vasoconstrictors, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, mast cell stabilizers and corticosteroids are available. Levocabastine and ketorolac tromethamine are new drugs for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. Lodoxamide is currently indicated only for the treatment of vernal keratoconjunctivitis, although treatment efficacy has been demonstrated in patients with giant papillary conjunctivitis and atopic keratoconjunctivitis. As a general rule, topical ocular allergy drugs are well tolerated by most patients except for transient stinging and burning on instillation. Ocular steroids should be reserved for severe cases and should be prescribed by an ophthalmologist, who can monitor the patient for possible ocular side effects.

Ketorolac does not decrease postoperative pain in elderly men after transvesical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

To assess the postoperative analgesic efficacy and morphine-sparing effect of ketorolac in elderly patients.

METHODS

Sixty ASA-physical status I to III men, aged 60-88 yr, undergoing transvesical prostatectomy were studied according to a randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind study protocol. A standard general anaesthetic was administered. Thirty minutes before concluding the surgical procedure either ketorolac 60 mg or an equal volume of saline was administered, im. Postoperative pain was assessed hourly for six hours using a 100 mm visual analog score (VAS) and a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device.

RESULTS

Hourly PCA-demands, actual morphine delivered, and patient generated VAS pain scores were unaffected by the treatment modality. On conclusion of the study the total PCA morphine delivered was 11.9 mg +/- 1.38 and 10.8 mg +/- 1.52 for the saline and ketorolac groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The intraoperative administration of ketorolac, 60 mg, im, was not associated with postoperative morphinesparing or improved analgesia in this elderly population.

A comparison of the efficacy of ketorolac and indomethacin for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic surgery in day patients

The analgesia provided in the postoperative period by three regimens commonly used in our private anaesthetic practice were compared in a double-blind study of one hundred and thirty-seven women presenting for day-case laparoscopic procedures. After random allocation into three groups, all patients were similarly anaesthetized and then received both a rectal suppository and an IM injection. Group P received two placebos, Group I had an indomethacin suppository 100 mg and Group K an IM injection of ketorolac 30 mg. The trial showed a statistically significant reduction in pain at 180 minutes postoperatively in the group receiving ketorolac (visual analog pain score of 13.8 v 21.7). The parenterally administered ketorolac may be a useful analgesic supplement in these patients. However the trial was aborted following the appearance in the literature of case reports of postoperative renal failure. Further investigation of the efficacy and side-effect profile of reduced doses may be warranted.