Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus paclitaxel plus alternating carboplatin and cisplatin for initial treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: long-term efficacy results: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) study

BACKGROUND

We compared the combination plus Carboplatin plus paclitaxel, which is considered the treatment of choice for initial chemotherapy of advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) with a regimen combining alternating carboplatin and cisplatin plus paclitaxel. The two platinum derivatives have been previously combined as they are not totally cross-resistant and as they share no overlapping toxicities.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with AOC, after the initial cytoreductive surgery were randomized to either 6 courses of paclitaxel at 175 mg/m2 as 3 h infusion plus Carboplatin at 7 AUC (Arm A) or Paclitaxel at the same dose plus Carboplatin again at 7 AUC for cycles 1,3,5, while for cycles 2,4,6 Cisplatin at 75 mg/m2 substituted for Carboplatin (Arm B).

RESULTS

247 patients are analyzed. Significant differences were not found, both in terms of PFS (38 vs 39 months, p=0.95) and overall survival (40.6 vs 38.6 months, p=0.79). There was not also difference in 5-year survival rate (35% vs 39%) or 5-year PFS rate (23% vs 28%). Age >60, PS 2, stage IV disease and presence of residual disease were adversely related to the overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Both regimens are well tolerated and effective. Alternating cisplatin with carboplatin does not improve the results compared with the standard combination.

Irinotecan plus weekly 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as salvage treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A phase II trial

PURPOSE

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of irinotecan (CPT-11), 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) (AIO regimen) as salvage treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-three patients relapsing after oxaliplatin-based first line chemotherapy were enrolled. There were 20 males and 13 females with median age of 69 years and WHO performance status (PS) of 0, 1, and 2 in 15, 16 and 2 patients, respectively. CPT-11 was administered on day 1 at 80 mg/m(2) in 60 min i.v. infusion, then LV (500 mg/m(2)) on day 1 as a 2h i.v. infusion, followed by 5-FU (2.600 mg/m(2)) as a 22h i.v. infusion. Treatment was repeated weekly for 6 consecutive weeks, in cycles of 7 weeks (one week rest).

RESULTS

All patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Complete response (CR) was achieved in 2 (6%) patients and partial response (PR) in 4 (12%) (over-all response rate - ORR: 18%, 95% C.I.: 5.95-35.43); 13 patients (40%) had stable disease (SD) and 14 (42%) progressive disease (PD). After a median follow up period of 9 months the median duration of response was 5 months, the median time to tumor progression (TTP) 7.5 months and the median overall survival (OS) 14 months. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occured in 13 (39%) patients, febrile neutropeina in 3 (9%), and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in one (3%). Grade 3/4 diarrhea occured in 12 (36%) patients, grade 3/4 neurotoxicity in 3 (9%), and grade 3 asthenia in 4 (12%). There was no treatment-related death.

CONCLUSION

The combination of weekly CPT-11 and infusional 5-FU/LV is an active and relatively well-tolerated regimen as salvage treatment in MCC.

Combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) plus oxaliplatin (L-OHP) as first-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer: a multicentre phase II trial

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with oxaliplatin (L-OHP) as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer (AGC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients with AGC who had not received previous therapy for metastatic disease were enrolled. The median age was 62.5 years and the World Health Organization performance status was 0-1 in 29 patients; 13 (40.6%) patients had previous surgery and three (9.4%) had adjuvant chemotherapy. L-OHP (85 mg/m2 as a 2-h i.v. infusion) followed by CPT-11 (200 mg/m2 as a 30-min i.v. infusion) was given on day 1, in cycles of 21 days.

RESULTS

All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 31 were evaluable for response. Complete response was achieved in one (3.1%) patient and a partial response was achieved in 15 (46.9%) [overall response rate = 50% (95% confidence interval 38.7-72.4%)]. Eight (25%) patients had stable disease, and eight (25%) had progressive disease. The median duration of response was 5 months and the median time to disease progression was 5.5 months. After a median follow-up period of 16 months, the median survival time was 8.5 months. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in six (18.6%) patients, febrile neutropenia in two (6.2%) and grade 3 anaemia in one (3.1%). Grade 3 diarrhoea was observed in two (6.2%) patients, grade 1 neurotoxicity in five (15.6%) and grade 3 asthenia in two (6.2%). There was no treatment-related death.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of CPT-11/L-OHP is an active regimen as front-line treatment in AGC with a favourable toxicity profile and deserves further evaluation in randomised studies.

Front-Line Chemotherapy with Docetaxel and Gemcitabine Administered Every Two Weeks in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Phase II Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the docetaxel-gemcitabine combination administered every 2 weeks in women with untreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

METHODS

Fifty-two patients with MBC received docetaxel 65 mg/m2 as front-line chemotherapy intravenously over 1 h followed by gemcitabine 1,500 mg/m2 intravenously over 30 min on days 1 and 14. Cycles were repeated every 28 days without prophylactic growth factor support. Twenty-eight (54%) patients had previously received chemotherapy as adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment. Thirty-six (69%) patients had visceral disease including 20 (38%) with liver metastases. All patients were evaluated for toxicity and 45 for response.

RESULTS

In an intention-to-treat analysis, a complete response occurred in 7 (13%) patients and partial response in 24 (46%) for an overall response rate of 59% (95% CI: 46.3-73.0%). The response rate was 68% for the 28 patients who had previously received adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 67% for the 36 patients with visceral metastases. The median duration of response was 6.1 months and the median time to disease progression 10.9 months. A total of 254 cycles were administered with dose reduction in 26 (10%) cycles and no lethal toxicity. Grade III-IV neutropenia occurred in 17 (33%) patients and thrombocytopenia in 3 (6%). Febrile neutropenia developed in 3 (6%) patients. Nonhematological toxicity was generally mild.

CONCLUSION

The docetaxel-gemcitabine combination is an active and well-tolerated front-line treatment for patients with MBC. This regimen represents a suitable option especially for women relapsing after anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Irinotecan plus gemcitabine vs irinotecan for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer pretreated with docetaxel and cisplatin: a multicentre, randomised, phase II study

To compare irinotecan (CPT-11)+gemcitabine vs CPT-11 alone as second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing after docetaxel-cisplatinum-based therapy. A total of 147 evaluable, pretreated patients, with NSCLC, received either gemcitabine (1000 mg m(-2), days 1 and 8)+CPT-11 (300 mg m(-2), day 8) (Group A, n=76) or CPT-11 (300 mg m(-2), day 1) (Group B, n=71), every 3 weeks. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The objective response rate was 18.4% (95% CI: 9.71-27.14%) and 4.2% (95% CI: 0-8.90%) (P=0.009) for groups A and B, respectively. No significant differences between the two groups in terms of the median duration of response, time to tumour progression, overall survival and 1-year survival were observed. The CPT-11/gemcitabine regimen significantly improved the patients' quality of life ('general mood today' (P=0.014), 'coughing' (P=0.003) and 'intensity of symptoms' (P=0.034)) compared with CPT-11. More cycles had to be delayed (P=0.001) and required prophylactic growth factor support (P=0.001) in Group A than B. Three (3.9%) patients in Group A and eight (11.3%) in Group B developed febrile neutropenia (P=0.09); one patient died of sepsis in each group. Three additional (Group A, n=1; Group B, n=2) treatment-related deaths were observed. Grade 3-4 haematologic toxicity was comparable in the two groups except anaemia (P=0.03 in favour of CPT-11). Other nonhaematologic toxicities were mild and similar in the two groups. CPT-11+gemcitabine resulted in a higher response rate and better control of disease-related symptoms than CPT-11 alone, but without any improvement in the overall survival.

Dose escalation study on oxaliplatin and capecitabine (Xeloda) in patients with advanced solid tumors

OBJECTIVES

Capecitabine (CAP) and oxaliplatin (OX) have shown interesting activity in a wide range of solid tumors. A phase I study was conducted in order to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of their combination in patients with refractory solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-three pretreated patients with histologically confirmed inoperable neoplasms were enrolled. The patients' median age was 64 years, 21 were males, and 27 had a WHO performance status of 0-1. OX was administered on days 1 and 8, as a 3-hour intravenous infusion, at escalated doses ranging from 50 to 70 mg/m(2). CAP was administered orally for 14 consecutive days, at escalated doses ranging from 1,200 to 2,100 mg/m(2)/day. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

At the dose of 2,100 mg/m(2) (Xeloda) and 70 mg/m(2) (OX), all 3 enrolled patients presented DLT (grade 3 diarrhea, grade 3 asthenia and grade 3 neurotoxicity, respectively), and, thus, the recommended MTD for future phase II studies are 2,000 mg/m(2) for CAP and 70 mg/m(2 )for OX. A total of 145 treatment cycles were administered. Toxicity was very mild. Grade 2/3 neutropenia was observed in 4 (3%) treatment cycles. The main nonhematologic toxicities were grade 2/3 nausea/vomiting (7 cycles; 5%), grade 2/3 neurotoxicity (10 cycles; 7%), grade 2/3 asthenia (8 cycles; 5.5%) and grade 2/3 diarrhea (6 cycles; 4%). There was no treatment-related death. One (4%) complete remission, 2 (8%) partial remissions, and 9 (36%) cases of stable disease were observed among 25 evaluable patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate that CAP and OX can be safely combined at clinically relevant doses and that this regimen merits further evaluation.

Front-line treatment of inoperable or metastatic pancreatic cancer with gemcitabine and capecitabine: an intergroup, multicenter, phase II study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine (GEM) combined with capecitabine (CAP) in untreated patients with inoperable or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-three patients with pancreatic cancer (85% stage IV) were enrolled. Patients were treated with GEM 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and CAP 1300 mg/m2 per day PO (per os), divided into two equal doses on days 1-14, in 21-day cycles.

RESULTS

In an-intention-to-treat analysis, 10 (18.9%) objective partial responses were achieved (95% confidence interval 8.33% to 29.4%). Twenty-two (42%) patients had stable disease and 15 (28%) had progressive disease. The median response time was 3 months (range 1.5-7.0) and the median time to tumor progression was 6.5 months (range 3.5-15.5). Median overall survival time was 8 months (range 1.0-15.5) and 1-year survival was 34.8%. Pain improvement during treatment was observed in 23 of 43 (53%) patients, and eight of 18 (44%) patients who had been receiving opioids discontinued their use. Weight gain was observed in 12 of 33 (36%) patients. Grade 3 anemia occurred in five (9%) patients and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in three (6%). Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 13 (25%) and five (9%) patients, respectively, and two (4%) developed febrile neutropenia. Non-hematological toxicity was mild.

CONCLUSION

In patients with pancreatic cancer, the combination of GEM with CAP is an active and well tolerated regimen that merits further evaluation in prospective randomized studies.

Bloodstream Infections in Patients with Solid Tumors: Associated Factors, Microbial Spectrum and Outcome

BACKGROUND

Although patients with malignant diseases are at increased risk for bloodstream infections (BSIs), limited data are available for those with solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The etiology, clinical features and outcome of BSIs were retrospectively studied in patients with solid tumors treated at the Department of Medical Oncology at the University Hospital of Heraklion, Greece, from November 1995 through June 2000.

RESULTS

A total of 157 episodes of BSIs was identified among 137 patients over the study period. The majority of the episodes (128; 82%) occurred in non-neutropenic patients. 80 of 157 (51%) of the episodes were healthcare-associated, 35% (55 of 157) were nosocomial and 14% (22 of 157) were community acquired. A single pathogen was isolated in 86% of the episodes. A total of 184 pathogens was isolated (51% gram-negative rods, 44% gram-positive cocci, 3% anaerobes and 3% fungi), while the portal of entry was identified in 104 of 157 (66%) of the episodes. The site of the primary tumor or the metastases were the source of BSI in 39 of 104 (37.5%) of the episodes with an identified source. The overall infectious mortality was 20% and was significantly higher when the initial empirical antibiotic therapy was inappropriate (39%; p < 0.001) and in the presence of shock (63%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

BSIs in patients with solid tumors are frequently healthcare associated and in a large percentage the portal of entry can be identified. Neutropenia is not as common as in patients with hematologic malignancies. Inappropriate initial empirical antibiotic therapy and shock are clinical factors associated with worse outcomes.

Adjuvant cytotoxic and endocrine therapy in pre- and postmenopausal patients with breast cancer and one to nine infiltrated nodes: five-year results of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group randomized HE 10/92 study

SUMMARY

The present randomized phase III trial was designed to detect a 15% benefit in relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) from the incorporation of adjuvant tamoxifen to the combination of CNF [cyclophosphamide, 500 mg/m2; mitoxantrone (Novantrone), 10 mg/m2; fluorouracil, 500 mg/m2 chemotherapy and ovarian ablation in premenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer and conversely from the incorporation of CNF chemotherapy to adjuvant tamoxifen in node-positive postmenopausal patients. From April 1992 until March 1998, 456 patients with operable breast cancer and one to nine infiltrated axillary nodes entered the study. Premenopausal patients were treated with six cycles of CNF chemotherapy followed by ovarian ablation with monthly injections of triptoreline 3.75 mg for 1 year (Group A, 84 patients) or the same treatment followed by 5 years of tamoxifen (Group B, 92 patients). Postmenopausal patients received 5 years of tamoxifen (Group C, 145 patients) or 6 cycles of CNF followed by 5 years of tamoxifen (Group D, 135 patients). Adjuvant radiation was administered to all patients with partial mastectomy. After a median follow-up period of 5 years, 125 patients (27%) relapsed and 79 (17%) died. The 5-year actuarial RFS for premenopausal patients was 65% in Group A and 68% in Group B (p = 0.86) and for postmenopausal patients 70% in Group C and 67% in Group D (p = 0.36). Also, the respective OS rates were 77% and 80% (p = 0.68) for premenopausal and 84% and 78% (p = 0.10) for postmenopausal patients. Severe toxicities were infrequently seen, with the exception of leukopenia (18%), among the 311 patients treated with CNF. In conclusion, the present study failed to demonstrate a 15% difference in RFS in favor of node-positive premenopausal patients treated with an additional 5 years of tamoxifen after CNF adjuvant chemotherapy and ovarian ablation. Similarly, six cycles of CNF preceding 5 years of tamoxifen did not translate to a 15% RFS benefit in node-positive postmenopausal patients.

Colorectal cancer in the adjuvant setting: perspectives on treatment and the role of prognostic factors

In patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) who have undergone potentially curative resection, adjuvant treatment with 6 months' of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus folinic acid (FA) is generally accepted as standard treatment and leads to a 5% to 10% improvement in absolute survival when compared with a no-chemotherapy control. In stage II CRC, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy has yet to be established. In metastatic CRC, randomized trials of irinotecan have consistently demonstrated that use of the drug, either alone or in combination with 5-FU/FA, prolongs survival. To investigate whether this benefit can be extended to patients with earlier disease, a series of multicenter trials are randomizing stage III colon cancer patients to adjuvant 5-FU/FA regimens with or without the addition of irinotecan. The role of adjuvant irinotecan is also being assessed in stage II colon cancer and in patients with rectal tumors. The risk/benefit ratio of adjuvant therapy in both stage III and stage II disease would be decreased if patients at the highest risk of relapse could be identified. Data from retrospective analyses suggest that DNA indexes, angiogenesis and some genetic/biological markers (loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 18 and the presence of microsatellite instability) identify prognostic differences in colon cancer patients. Their value as a guide to the intensity of adjuvant therapy required should be tested by randomized trial, as should the use of markers such as thymidilate synthase overexpression as a means of tailoring drug choice to tumor characteristics.

ZD1839, a novel, oral epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as salvage treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Experience from a single center participating in a compassionate use program

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of the orally active, selective epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) ZD1839 in patients with pretreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) participating in a compassionate use program.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients with advanced, unresectable and progressive NSCLC, previously treated with one or two chemotherapy regimens, received ZD1839 250 mg orally once daily. Patients who had received only one prior chemotherapy regimen had to be considered unsuitable for second-line chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The disease control rate was 32% (95% CI: 15.8-48.7) (1/31 patients had a partial response and 9/31 patients had stable disease) and the median overall survival 23 weeks (range 4-40). Symptom improvement was reported by 39% of patients overall and by 83% of patients who achieved disease control. The median time to symptom improvement was 3 weeks (range 2-4). Adverse events were generally mild (grade I or II) and reversible and consisted mostly of skin rash, diarrhea and fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

ZD1839 demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity with significant improvement in symptoms in this heavily pretreated group of patients with advanced NSCLC. Furthermore, ZD1839 showed a favorable toxicity profile, with the majority of adverse events being mild and reversible.

Peripheral blood circulating cytokeratin-19 mRNA-positive cells after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of the molecular detection of cytokeratin 19 (CK-19) mRNA-positive cells in the peripheral blood of women with operable breast cancer after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Blood from 161 patients with stage I and II breast cancer, obtained after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, was tested by nested RT-PCR for CK-19 mRNA detection. Using univariate and multivariate analyses possible interactions with other prognostic factors and association of CK-19 mRNA detection with risk of relapse, disease-free interval (DFI) and overall survival were investigated.

RESULTS

After completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, 27.3% of patients had peripheral blood CK-19 mRNA-positive cells; there was no association of this finding with any other prognostic factors or the type of chemotherapy regimen used. For patients with less than four involved axillary lymph nodes the risk of relapse was 3.81 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-13.71] times higher, and the DFI was significantly reduced (P = 0.028) if CK-19 mRNA-positive cells were detectable in the blood after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy. In contrast, for patients with four or more involved lymph nodes, the presence of CK-19 mRNA-positive cells after adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly affect the risk of relapse or DFI. Furthermore, the risk of relapse was higher (hazards ratio 3.70; 95% CI 1.09-13.89) and the DFI was reduced (P = 0.022) for patients with detectable CK-19 mRNA-positive cells following adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) as compared with epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil (FEC) or sequential taxotere-epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (T/EC) chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of CK-19 mRNA-positive cells in the peripheral blood after adjuvant chemotherapy may be of clinical relevance for patients with early breast cancer and less than four involved axillary lymph nodes.

Salvage treatment of metastatic breast cancer with docetaxel and carboplatin. A multicenter phase II trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel in combination with carboplatin as salvage treatment in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-pretreated women with MBC were treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) as 1-hour i.v. infusion followed by carboplatin AUC 6 mg/ml.min, using the Calvert's formula, as 30-min i.v. infusion. Cycles were repeated on an outpatient basis every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients received a total of 210 chemotherapy cycles (median 6 cycles/patient). All but one patient had previously received anthracyclines for the treatment of metastatic disease and half of the patients had failed to respond to front-line treatment. Twenty-eight (78%) patients had visceral disease. On an intention-to-treat analysis there were three (8%) complete and 19 (53%) partial responses for an overall response rate of 61% (95% CI: 45.2-77.0%). The response rate was 44% (2 CRs, 6 PRs) among 18 patients who had progressive or stable disease as best response to front-line treatment. The median duration of response was 8 months, the median time to tumor progression 10 months, and the probability of 1-year survival 66%. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was the main hematologic toxicity occurring in 16 (45%) patients or 36 (17%) cycles. Seven (19%) patients developed 8 (4%) febrile neutropenic episodes. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in 4 (11%) patients or 6 (3%) cycles. Non-hematologic toxicity was generally mild. G-CSF was used in 19 (53%) patients or 134 (64%) cycles. There was one sudden death possibly related to the treatment.

CONCLUSION

The docetaxel-carboplatin combination is an active outpatient salvage regimen for the treatment of women with MBC relapsing or not responding to anthracycline-based front-line therapy.

Molecular detection of cancer cells in the peripheral blood of patients with breast cancer: comparison of CK-19, CEA and maspin as detection markers

PURPOSE

To investigate and compare the diagnostic value of the detection of cytokeratin 19 (CK-19), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and maspin mRNA by nested RT-PCR in the peripheral blood of women with breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The tumor cell lines MCF-7 and LOVO were used in an experimental tumor cell dilution model to determine the sensitivity of the nested RT-PCR for the 3 detection markers. RT-PCR analysis was performed in the peripheral blood of 54 healthy female blood donors, 28 patients with hematological malignancies, 31 with metastatic colorectal cancer, 75 with operable and 50 with metastatic breast cancer before receiving any cytotoxic chemotherapy, as well as in the bone marrow aspirates of 61 breast cancer patients.

RESULTS

Nested RT-PCR for CK-19 mRNA presented the highest sensitivity by detecting 1 tumor cell amongst 10(6) PBMC in 4 out of 5 experiments. CK-19 mRNA was detected in the peripheral blood of 3.7% of female blood donors, 14.3% of hematological malignancies, 32% of operable and 42% of metastatic breast cancer patients. CEA mRNA was undetectable in the blood of female blood donors but was detected in blood samples of 3.5% of hematological malignancies, 19.3% of colorectal cancer and 10% of breast cancer patients. Maspin mRNA was undetectable in the blood of female blood donors, patients with hematological malignancies and colorectal cancer but was detected in 9.3% of operable and 14% of metastatic breast cancer patients. Maspin mRNA positivity correlated with tumor size in patients with early stage breast cancer (p = 0.057). The detection rates of CK-19 and maspin mRNA in bone marrow aspirates were 33% and 11% for operable and 62% and 9% for metastatic breast cancer, respectively. During follow-up, 27.4% of blood samples were positive for CK-19 mRNA versus 10.7% for maspin mRNA in patients with operable breast cancer with a concordance rate of only 12.7% for positives and 86% for negatives.

CONCLUSION

RT-PCR positivity for CK-19 mRNA is the most sensitive detection marker for occult tumor cells in operable and metastatic breast cancer, although nested RT-PCR for maspin mRNA appears to be more specific.

Treatment of pancreatic cancer with a combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) and gemcitabine: a multicenter phase II study by the Greek Cooperative Group for Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine (GEM) and irinotecan (CPT-11) is evaluated in previously untreated patients with inoperable or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1999 to July 2001, 60 patients with pancreatic cancer (85% stage IV) were enrolled in a two-step extended phase II trial. Patients were treated with gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) and CPT-11 (300 mg/m2 on day 8) in cycles of 3 weeks. No prophylactic use of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) was initially planned.

RESULTS

In an intention-to-treat analysis one (1.7%) complete and 14 (23.3%) partial responses were achieved [objective response rate (ORR) 24.7%; 95% confidence interval 14.04% to 35.96%]. Twenty-two (36.7%) and 23 (38.3%) patients had stable and progressive disease, respectively. The median duration of response was 5 months, the median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 7 months and the median overall survival 7 months. One-year survival was 22.5%. Pain improvement and asthenia during treatment were observed in 45% and 43% of patients, respectively; weight gain occurred in 19.5% of patients. Grade 3 anemia occurred in three (5%) patients who required transfusion of six packed red blood cell (RBC) units. Ten (16.7%) additional patients with grade 2 anemia were treated with recombinant erythropoietin. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in seven (11.7%) patients and grades 3 and 4 neutropenia in 27 (45%). Ten patients developed febrile neutropenia, two of whom died due to sepsis. Prophylactic use of rhG-CSF was eventually required in 93 (28.3%) of 329 administered cycles. Other toxicities were mild.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gemcitabine and irinotecan is an active chemotherapy regimen against pancreatic cancer with a 25% ORR. Toxicity was acceptable for the great majority of patients but with a high percentage of hematopoietic growth factor administration.