Antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery

Ergonomics in Dermatologic Surgery: Lessons Learned Across Related Specialties and Opportunities for Improvement

BACKGROUND

As the practice of dermatology becomes increasingly procedurally based, there is a concordant rise in musculoskeletal injury (MSI) risk. Dermatologic surgeons are most susceptible and, although the majority suffer from MSI, few have received any formal ergonomics training. This stems from a lack of awareness of this troubling trend and a paucity of research and education on the ergonomics of dermatologic surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To highlight pertinent ergonomics principles and strategies from other specialties that could be translated into dermatology, and to synthesize general recommendations aimed at reducing MSI among dermatologic surgeons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive search of the PubMed and Cochrane Reviews databases from 1975 to 2019 was conducted, using a combination of ergonomics-related search terms, generating 6 publications from the dermatology literature and 58 from the fields of dentistry, medicine, and select surgical subspecialties.

RESULTS

This multidisciplinary approach yielded multiple interventions that could be applied directly (i.e., adequate lighting, adjustable operating tables, and surgical seat heights) or indirectly pending further investigation into their feasibility (i.e., video displays of the surgical field to allow neutral head and neck postures).

CONCLUSION

Although much can be learned from decades of prior ergonomics research from other specialties, considerations that are unique to dermatology remain and must be addressed with specialty-specific research.

Effect of ethanol extract from Lactobacillus plantarum TWK10-fermented soymilk on wound healing in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat

Wound healing is a highly dynamic phenomenon comprising numerous coordinated steps including homeostasis/coagulation, inflammation, migration, proliferation, and remodeling. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a multisystem chronic epidemic that prolongs inflammation in wounds and is associated with impaired healing. This study aimed to investigate the effect of an ethanol extract from Lactobacillus plantarum TWK10 (TWK10)-fermented soymilk on wound healing. The anti-inflammatory effects of the ethanol extract of TWK10-fermented soymilk on lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophage cells were examined. The ethanol extract of TWK10-fermented soymilk (100 µg/mL) significantly decreased nitric oxide production from 11.34 ± 0.74 μM to 8.24 ± 2.02 µM (p < 0.05) and enhanced proliferation in Detroit 551 cells cultured in high-glucose medium; the cell number peaked at 128.44 ± 7.67% (compared to the untreated control) at 600 µg/mL. An ethanol extract of TWK10-fermented soymilk + vaseline-treated rat model of streptozotocin-induced diabetic wounds was generated herein, and the following groups were formed herein: normal control (NC), blank control (BC), low dose group (LD, 0.24 mg/wound), intermediate dose (MD, 0.48 mg/wound), and high dose (HD, 2.40 mg/wound). On day 14 after wound infliction, the wound area in the LD, MD, and HD groups was significantly decreased to 10.2, 8.4, and 8.5% respectively (p < 0.05). Moreover, in the LD, MD, and, HD groups, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin 6, and matrix metalloproteinase-9 were downregulated in the wounded skin. These results show that the topical application of the ethanol extract of TWK10-fermented soymilk is beneficial for enhancing wound healing and for the closure of diabetic wounds.

[Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatosurgery-2019 status quo]

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) is determined as a short-term, in general single-shot administration of an antibiotic prior to a surgical intervention. The main goal of PAP is to reduce postoperative surgical site infections. In addition, PAP is administered to avoid development of bacterial endocarditis in patients who are at high risk. Regarding the increasing prescription of antibiotics by dermatologists and the rising emergence of resistant bacterial strains, a rational use of PAP in dermatosurgery has to be demanded. Thus, identification of risk factors being determined either by the patient, the type of surgery or the location will help to identify those patients requiring PAP. Moreover, utilizing established criteria will avoid the unnecessary administration of PAP-which only creates a false sense of safety.

Retrospective Evaluation of the Safety of Large Skin Flap, Large Skin Graft, and Interpolation Flap Surgery in the Outpatient Setting

BACKGROUND

As the number of cutaneous surgeries continues to increase, it is important to evaluate the safety of dermatologic surgery in the outpatient setting.

OBJECTIVE

The authors sought to determine postoperative bleeding, infection, dehiscence, and necrosis rates in office-based dermatologic surgery using large flap, large graft, and interpolation flap repairs. The authors evaluated the relationship between these complications and surgical site, closure type, repair size, antibiotic use, and antithrombotic use.

METHODS

Eligible patients were identified through searching the electronic medical records from one Mohs micrographic surgeon at University Hospitals Medical Center. Patient information, surgery characteristics, and complication information were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to reveal associations between each complication and closure type, repair size, repair site, antithrombotic use, and antibiotic use.

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirty-one reconstruction procedures after Mohs micrographic surgery and excision qualified for the study. The rates of postoperative infection, hemorrhage, hematoma, necrosis, and dehiscence were 5%, 0.3%, 2.4%, 3%, and 0.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Complications were infrequent and non-life-threatening. The authors' results indicate that dermatologic surgery using large flaps, interpolation flaps, and large grafts is safe in the office setting.

Effect of a Single Preoperative Dose of Oral Antibiotic to Reduce the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection Following Below-Knee Dermatological Flap and Graft Repair

Background

Surgical site infection (SSI) rates for below-knee dermatological surgery are unacceptably high, particularly following complex flap and graft closures. The role of antibiotic prophylaxis for these surgical cases is uncertain.

Objective

To determine whether SSI following complex dermatological closures on the leg could be reduced by antibiotic prophylaxis administered as a single oral preoperative dose.

Methods

A total of 115 participants were randomized to 2 g of oral cephalexin or placebo 40–60 minutes prior to surgical incision in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at a primary care skin cancer clinic in North Queensland, Australia.

Results

Overall 17/55 (30.9%) controls and 14/55 (25.5%) intervention participants developed infection (P = 0.525). There was no difference between the study groups in adverse symptoms that could be attributed to high-dose antibiotic administration (P = 1).

Conclusion

A single oral 2-g dose of cephalexin given before complex below-knee dermatological closure did not reduce SSI.

Pre- and perioperative aspects of dermatosurgery

Dermatosurgery occupies an exceptional position among all surgical disciplines. Above all, this includes the fact that, with very few exceptions, the vast majority of surgical interventions can be performed under local or regional anesthesia, usually in smaller procedure rooms that are spatially separated from larger operating suites. Thus, peri- and postinterventional patient monitoring is the responsibility of the dermatosurgeon and his team. Though inherently smaller, this team still has to observe numerous perioperative requirements that - in larger surgical specialties - would be attended to by a host of various specialists working in concert. Said requirements include hygienic aspects, knowledge concerning pre- and intraoperative patient monitoring, managing surgical site infections, adequate postsurgical pain management, as well as detailed pharmacological knowledge with respect to common local anesthetics and the toxic and allergic reactions associated therewith. Not only does this require interdisciplinary collaboration and shared responsibility for the patient. It also necessitates the development and implementation of quality-oriented and evidence-based guidelines that, in the dermatosurgical setting, usually extend far beyond the scope of the specialty per se. The objective of the present CME article is the condensed presentation of interdisciplinary aspects relating to the most important perioperative issues.

Prä- und perioperative Aspekte der Versorgung dermatochirurgischer Patienten

Die Dermatochirurgie nimmt hinsichtlich vieler Punkte eine Sonderstellung unter den operativen Fächern ein. Hierzu gehört in erster Linie die Tatsache, dass bis auf wenige Ausnahmen fast alle Eingriffe traditionell in Lokal- bzw. Regionalanästhesie und oft auch in räumlich-infrastruktureller Trennung von den großen Zentral-Operationssälen stattfinden können. Die peri- und postoperative Überwachung obliegt dabei dem dermatochirurgischen Operationsteam. Das sui generis kleinere OP-Team hat somit eine ganze Reihe perioperativer Notwendigkeiten zu beachten, um die sich in den "großen" chirurgischen Fächern eine Vielzahl verschiedener beteiligter Fachgruppen gemeinsam kümmern. Hierzu gehören neben Hygieneaspekten, Kenntnissen in der Überwachung der Patienten sowie dem Aspekt der surgical site infections auch Fragen zur postoperativen Schmerztherapie sowie detailliertes pharmakologisches Wissen über die zur Anwendung kommenden Lokalanästhetika und das Handling der damit assoziierten toxischen und allergischen Reaktionen. Eine interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit und Verantwortung für den Patienten ist notwendig und erfordert die Erarbeitung und Umsetzung qualitätsorientierter und evidenzbasierter Handlungsanweisungen, die im dermatochirurgischen OP-Setting meist weit über das eigentliche Fach hinausgehen. Ziel dieses Weiterbildungsartikels soll die komprimierte Darstellung der genannten fachübergreifenden Standpunkte bezüglich der wichtigsten perioperativen Aspekte sein.

A Review of Antibiotics in Dermatology

Background:

Since the early 1930s when antibiotics were first introduced, they have revolutionized the way physicians treat infections. Skin conditions from acne to leprosy, which were once shunned by society, are now easily treated with oral antibiotics.

Objective:

Antibiotics are chemicals derived from bacteria and fungi that uniquely have antibacterial action. The most notable example is penicillin, which is derived from a mold. With hundreds of antibiotics available to the practicing physician, improper use of these drugs has become widespread and expensive and has spawned resistant strains. For the dermatologist, antibiotics are vital weapons in the drug armamentarium for treating various skin conditions.

Conclusion:

This review explores the newest and most common oral, parenteral, and topical antibiotics used in dermatology, their indications, adverse effects, dosage, and spectrum of activity. Furthermore, systemic antibacterial prophylaxis and vaccines pertinent to dermatology are discussed. The penicillins, cephalosporins, tetracyclines, macrolides, fluoroquinolones, sulfonamides, aminoglycosides, lincosamides, folate inhibitors, and a new synthetic class of drugs, the oxazolidinones, are reviewed. These antibiotics are used to treat a variety of organisms.

Bacterial infections following non-ablative fractional laser treatment: a case series and discussion

Non-ablative fractional laser procedures have become increasingly popular since their introduction in 2004. The fractional 1,927 nm thulium laser is a non-ablative device that penetrates up to 300 μm in the skin and the 1,550 nm erbium:glass laser penetrates up to 1,400 μm. These procedures are considered minimally invasive with a high safety profile; therefore, infectious complications are exceedingly rare. However, we report five recent cases of bacterial infection with both gram-positive and gram-negative organisms following treatment with the fractional 1550/1927 nm laser approximately 1 day to 1 week post-procedure. One patient had a rapidly progressing pustular eruption with symptoms of sepsis. These patients were seen immediately, cultures were obtained and empiric antibiotic therapy was initiated. They recovered without long-term complications. Rapid-onset bacterial infections following non-ablative laser resurfacing with the 1550/1927 nm laser have not been previously reported in the literature. The infections can progress quickly and lead to serious sequelae, including systemic illness and severe scarring, if not identified and appropriately treated. We present these cases to highlight the importance of close surveillance and when appropriate, rapid intervention, following non-ablative fractional procedures, especially when patients present with atypical symptoms and signs.

Comparing Demographic Characteristics and Adverse Event Rates at Two Dermatologic Surgery Practices

Background:

Patient demographics and operative techniques may contribute to adverse events after surgeries.

Objective:

To identify differences in adverse event rates between different dermatologic surgery centers and potential contributing features affecting these rates.

Methods:

Data regarding demographics, procedure type, and adverse events were collected at two dermatologic surgery centers.

Results:

The most common adverse event at both sites was infection: 2.1% at site 1 versus 0.5% at site 2 ( p < .001). Using multivariate logistic regression, procedure type (Mohs surgery), geographic location (being at site 1), older age, and anatomic location of surgery were associated with a higher risk of infection.

Conclusion:

Adverse event rate appears to correlate with patient demographics, procedure type, and setting of surgery more than use of prophylactic antibiotics. Identification of differences in adverse event rates and potential contributing variables at different practices may allow for identification of opportunities to prevent adverse events.

Prevention of surgical site infection in lower limb skin lesion excisions with single dose oral antibiotic prophylaxis: a prospective randomised placebo-controlled double-blind trial

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of a single perioperative prophylactic 2 g dose of cephalexin in preventing surgical site infection (SSI) following excision of skin lesions from the lower limb.

DESIGN

Prospective double-blinded placebo-controlled trial testing for difference in infection rates.

SETTING

Primary care in regional North Queensland, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

52 patients undergoing lower limb skin lesion excision.

INTERVENTIONS

2 g dose of cephalexin 30-60 min before excision.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of SSI.

RESULTS

Incidence of SSI was 12.5% (95% CI 2.7% to 32.4%) in the cephalexin group compared with 35.7% (95% CI 18.6% to 55.9%) in the placebo group (p=0.064). This represented an absolute reduction of 23.21% (95% CI -0.39% to 46.82%), relative reduction of 65.00% (95% CI -12.70% to 89.13%) and number-needed-to-treat of 4.3.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of a single 2 g dose of cephalexin 30-60 min before skin lesion excision from the lower limb may produce a reduction in the incidence of infection; however, this study was underpowered to statistically determine this.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12611000595910.

Surgical site infections in skin surgery: a single center experience

The main interests covered in this article are the determination of risk factors and incidence of surgical site infections in dermatosurgery and suggestions for rational use of antibiotic prophylaxis. A total of 3284 consecutive dermatosurgical interventions in 1088 patients were performed in our dermatosurgery department. Data regarding patient characteristics and perioperative course were prospectively collected and retrospective analysis of this data was performed. Association of perioperative parameters and postoperative surgical site infections was assessed by χ(2) -test. Rate of postoperative infections in our study was low (1.9%). Purulent surgical sites showed the highest incidence of severe postoperative infections (4.7%; P < 0.001). The lowest incidence of mild infections was seen in preoperatively clean surgical sites (0.8%; P < 0.001). All patients with severe infections and 68% patients with mild infections were older than 70 years. The head and neck and acral regions were the groups mostly affected by mild postoperative conditions (2.4% and 1.7%, respectively; P = 0.006). The frequency of mild and severe infections in procedures performed by experienced surgeons was lower than in procedures performed by less experienced surgeons (0.6% vs 3.1% in mild infections, 0.1 vs 0.8 in severe infections; P < 0.001). The main risk factors for postoperative infections were wounds in the head and neck region, lips and oral mucosa or acral regions, older age of patients, worse preoperative state of surgical sites and less experienced surgeons. In the majority of cases where risk factors were missing there was no need of antibiotic prophylaxis.

Medical legal complications of cutaneous surgery

Complications in surgery are an unfavorable outcome as a result of a procedure. These can occur intraoperatively, immediately after or in the distant future. Minimizing the risk and prompt treatment of complications is important to avoid potentially disastrous outcomes. This article will review the more common complications of cutaneous surgery and then analyze the legal consequences of these complications.

Basic concepts in skin biopsy. Part I

The aim of these reviews is to describe the reasons for performing skin biopsy, to provide indications for the choice of area to be biopsied and the preparation of the sample, and to summarize the various complications of dermatologic surgery. In addition, we present a guide for selecting the biopsy technique based on the suspected diagnosis and on the area to be biopsied. Finally, the various artifacts that can complicate interpretation of results are described, together with the methods used to prevent their appearance insofar as is possible. The aim of this guide is to improve the diagnostic yield of biopsies and to highlight the importance of a correct clinical-histological correlation.

Use of topical antibiotics as prophylaxis in clean dermatologic procedures

BACKGROUND

Topical antibiotics are not indicated for routine postoperative care in clean dermatologic procedures, but may be widely used.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to describe topical antibiotic use in clean dermatologic surgical procedures in the United States.

METHODS

The 1993 to 2007 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey database was queried for visits in which clean dermatologic surgery was performed. We analyzed provider specialty, use of topical antibiotics, and associated diagnoses. Use of topical antibiotic over time was analyzed by linear regression.

RESULTS

An estimated 212 million clean dermatologic procedures were performed between 1993 and 2007; topical antibiotics were reported in approximately 10.6 million (5.0%) procedures. Dermatologists were responsible for 63.3% of dermatologic surgery procedures and reported use of topical antibiotic prophylaxis in 8.0 million (6.0%). Dermatologists were more likely to use topical antibiotic prophylaxis than nondermatologists (6.0% vs 3.5%). Use of topical antibiotic prophylaxis decreased over time.

LIMITATIONS

Data were limited to outpatient procedures. The assumption was made that when topical antibiotics were documented at procedure visits they were being used as prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical antibiotics continue to be used as prophylaxis in clean dermatologic procedures, despite being ineffective for this purpose and posing a risk to patients. Although topical antibiotic use is decreasing, prophylactic use should be eliminated.

Topical antibiotic trends from 1993 to 2007: use of topical antibiotics for non-evidence-based indications

BACKGROUND

Systemic antibiotic use has become more conservative with the emergence of drug resistance. Topical antibiotics are employed for a variety of indications, although there are only a few evidence-based indications.

OBJECTIVE

To examine topical antibiotics use in the outpatient setting.

METHODS

Topical antibiotic use was characterized using data from the 1993 to 2007 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Visits were identified at which a topical antibiotic was used and analyzed according to patient demographics, diagnoses, procedures, concomitant medications, and provider specialty. Topical antibiotic use over time was analyzed using linear regression.

RESULTS

The most frequent diagnoses associated with topical antibiotic use were benign or malignant neoplasm of skin, impetigo, insect bite, and cellulitis. Data revealed a significant downward trend in topical antibiotics associated with dermatologic surgery (p<.001) and a nonsignificant downward trend in use in conjunction with skin biopsies (p=.09). Topical antibiotic use by dermatologists was noted to be decreasing over time, whereas among non dermatologists, it was noted to be increasing, although neither of these trends was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Topical antibiotics continue to be used for non-evidence-based indications, despite data that suggest that such use may be detrimental for patients and represents significant costs to the health care system. The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.

[Basic concepts in skin biopsy. Part I]

The aim of these reviews is to describe the reasons for performing skin biopsy, to provide indications for the choice of area to be biopsied and the preparation of the sample, and to summarize the various complications of dermatologic surgery. In addition, we present a guide for selecting the biopsy technique based on the suspected diagnosis and on the area to be biopsied. Finally, the various artifacts that can complicate interpretation of results are described, together with the methods used to prevent their appearance insofar as is possible. The aim of this guide is to improve the diagnostic yield of biopsies and to highlight the importance of a correct clinical-histological correlation.

Prospective evaluation of dermatologic surgery complications including patients on multiple antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications

BACKGROUND

Few prospective studies have evaluated the safety of dermatologic surgery.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine rates of bleeding, infection, flap and graft necrosis, and dehiscence in outpatient dermatologic surgery, and to examine their relationship to type of repair, anatomic location of repair, antibiotic use, antiplatelet use, or anticoagulant use.

METHODS

Patients presenting to University of Massachusetts Medical School Dermatology Clinic for surgery during a 15-month period were prospectively entered. Medications, procedures, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Of the 1911 patients, 38% were on one anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication, and 8.0% were on two or more. Risk of hemorrhage was 0.89%. Complex repair (odds ratio [OR] = 5.80), graft repair (OR = 7.58), flap repair (OR = 11.93), and partial repair (OR = 43.13) were more likely to result in bleeding than intermediate repair. Patients on both clopidogrel and warfarin were 40 times more likely to have bleeding complications than all others (P = .03). Risk of infection was 1.3%, but was greater than 3% on the genitalia, scalp, back, and leg. Partial flap necrosis occurred in 1.7% of flaps, and partial graft necrosis occurred in 8.6% of grafts. Partial graft necrosis occurred in 20% of grafts on the scalp and 10% of grafts on the nose. All complications resolved without sequelae.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited to one academic dermatology practice.

CONCLUSION

The rate of complications in dermatologic surgery is low, even when multiple oral anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications are continued, and prophylactic antibiotics are not used. Closure type and use of warfarin or clopidogrel increase bleeding risk. However, these medications should be continued to avoid adverse thrombotic events.

The role of topical antibiotics used as prophylaxis in surgical site infection prevention

Compared with systemic antibiotic therapy, the topical or local delivery of an antibiotic has many potential advantages. However, local antibiotics at the surgical site have received very limited approval in any of the surgical prophylaxis consensus guidelines that we are aware of. A review of the literature was carried out through searches of peer-reviewed publications in PubMed in the English language over a 30 year period between January 1980 and May 2010. Both retrospective and prospective studies were included, as well as meta-analyses. With regard to defining 'topical' or 'local' antibiotic application, the application of an antibiotic solution to the surgical site intraoperatively or immediately post-operatively was included. A number of surgical procedures have been shown to significantly benefit from perioperative topical prophylaxis, e.g. joint arthroplasty, cataract surgery and, possibly, breast augmentation. In obese patients undergoing abdominal surgery, topical surgical prophylaxis is also proven to be beneficial. The selective use of topical antibiotics as surgical prophylaxis is justified for specific procedures, such as joint arthroplasty, cataract surgery and, possibly, breast augmentation. In selective cases, such as obese patients undergoing abdominal surgery, topical surgical prophylaxis is also proven to be beneficial. Apart from these specific indications, the evidence for use of topical antibiotics in surgery is lacking in conclusive randomized controlled trials.

Does single application of topical chloramphenicol to high risk sutured wounds reduce incidence of wound infection after minor surgery? Prospective randomised placebo controlled double blind trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of a single application of topical chloramphenicol ointment in preventing wound infection after minor dermatological surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective randomised placebo controlled double blind multicentre trial.

SETTING

Primary care in a regional centre in Queensland, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

972 minor surgery patients.

INTERVENTIONS

A single topical dose of chloramphenicol (n=488) or paraffin ointment (n=484; placebo).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Incidence of infection.

RESULTS

The incidence of infection in the chloramphenicol group (6.6%; 95% confidence interval 4.9 to 8.8) was significantly lower than that in the control group (11.0%; 7.9 to 15.1) (P=0.010). The absolute reduction in infection rate was 4.4%, the relative reduction was 40%, and the relative risk of wound infection in the control group was 1.7 (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 2.5) times higher than in the intervention group. The number needed to treat was 22.8.

CONCLUSION

Application of a single dose of topical chloramphenicol to high risk sutured wounds after minor surgery produces a moderate absolute reduction in infection rate that is statistically but not clinically significant. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN73223053.

Prospective evaluation of surgical site infection rate among patients with Mohs micrographic surgery without the use of prophylactic antibiotics

BACKGROUND

Antibiotics may be indiscriminately given to patients undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for the prevention of surgical site infections, despite a low risk of infection in these patients.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the rate of wound infections among patients undergoing MMS without the use of prophylactic antibiotics.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 1000 consecutive patients undergoing MMS for nonmelanoma skin cancer or modified MMS/"slow Mohs" for lentigo maligna melanoma in situ.

RESULTS

The overall wound infection rate among 1000 patients with 1115 tumors was 0.7% (8/1115 tumors). Five (62.5%) of 8 infections occurred on the nose with an overall 1.7% (5/302) nose infection rate. Seven (87.5%) of 8 infections occurred after flap reconstruction with an overall 2.4% (7/296) flap closure infection rate. Four (50%) of 8 infections occurred in patients requiring more than one Mohs stage for tumor clearance with a 0.8% (4/487) overall infection rate in cases requiring multiple Mohs stages. Two (25%) of 8 infections had cultures positive for oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. No wound infections occurred in cases involving the lips or ears, skin-graft closures, or below-knee or modified MMS procedures.

LIMITATIONS

This was a prospective single institution uncontrolled study.

CONCLUSION

Rates of infections among patients undergoing MMS or modified MMS are exceedingly low. Indiscriminate use of antibiotics increases patient risk to adverse drug reactions and antibiotic resistance. Administration of antibiotics to patients undergoing MMS should be on a case-by-case basis according to the known risk factors combined with clinical judgment.

Infectious Complications and Antibiotic Use in Dermatologic Surgery

Infection rates in dermatologic surgery are low, ranging on average from 1 to 3%. Studies have shown that many practitioners likely overuse antibiotics, both for prevention of wound infection and in endocarditis prophylaxis. This article discusses patient and environmental risk factors in would infection. Data on wound infection prophylaxis are reviewed, and specific guidelines set forth with regards to appropriate antibiotic usage, drug selection, dosage, and timing. In addition, recommendations surrounding endocarditis and prosthetic joint infection prophylaxis are presented as they apply to dermatologic surgery.

Infection control practices and infectious complications in dermatological surgery

The aim of this study was to assess infection control practices and their impact upon infectious complications in skin surgery conducted by private dermatologists. A prospective study was carried out by 73 volunteers belonging to the Surgical Group of the Société Française de Dermatologie over a period of three months. Data were collected for surgical procedures performed during this period, including the excision of all benign or malignant tumours, but excluding sebaceous cysts and pyodermas. A total of 3491 dermatological surgical procedures were included in the survey. Post-operative infections occurred in 67 patients (1.9%), with superficial suppuration accounting for 92.5% of surgical site infections. The incidence was higher in the excision group with a reconstructive procedure (4.3%) than in excisions alone (1.6%). Infection control precautions varied according to the site of procedure; multivariate analysis showed that haemorrhagic complications were an independent factor for infection in both types of surgical procedure. The male gender, immunosuppressive therapy and not wearing sterile gloves were independent factors for infections occurring following excisions with reconstruction. Not all of the procedures needed the use of a hospital theatre. It is clear that for excisions with a reconstructive procedure or for certain anatomical sites, such as the nose, there should be more emphasis upon infection control precautions. Further studies are needed to establish optimal guidelines for this kind of surgery.

Antimicrobial use in the surgical patient

Antimicrobials are often used in the surgical patient in an effort to prevent infection (prophylactic) or to treat established infection (therapeutic). To be effective, prophylactic antimicrobials at appropriate concentrations must be present in tissues at the surgical site at the time of contamination to prevent bacterial growth and subsequent infection. Therapeutic antimicrobials are used to treat established localized or systemic infection. Selection of antimicrobial agents for prophylactic or therapeutic use should be based on knowledge of expected flora, ability of the antimicrobial to reach the target tissue at appropriate concentrations, bacterial resistance patterns, drug pharmacokinetics, and culture and susceptibility testing results (therapeutic use). Failure of antimicrobial therapy to prevent or treat infection in the surgical patient may result from poor antimicrobial selection, inappropriate dosage or frequency, or inappropriate duration of therapy.

Prospective study of wound infections in dermatologic surgery in the absence of prophylactic antibiotics

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to identify wound sites/procedures where infection incidence was over 5%, such that these circumstances may warrant wound infection antibiotic prophylaxis.

METHOD

We undertook a 3-year prospective study of 5,091 lesions (predominantly nonmelanoma skin cancer) treated on 2,424 patients from July 2002 to June 2005. No patient was given prophylactic antibiotics, and no patient ceased warfarin or aspirin.

RESULTS

Overall infection incidence was 1.47%. Individual procedures had the following infection incidence: curettage 0.73% (3/412); skin flap repairs 2.94% (47/1601); simple excision and closure 0.54% (16/2974); skin grafts 8.70% (6/69); and wedge excision 8.57% (3/35). Analysis of regions of the body demonstrated that surgery below the knee (n = 448) had an infection incidence of 6.92% (31/448) (p < .0001). Subanalysis demonstrated that all regions below the knee were at high infection risk. Elsewhere, groin excisional surgery had an infection incidence of 10% (1/10) (p = .027). No other body site demonstrated an infection incidence beyond 5% of statistical significance. Procedures on the face demonstrated an infection incidence of 0.81% (18/2,209). Diabetic patients, those on warfarin and/or aspirin, and smokers showed no difference in infection incidence.

CONCLUSION

Based on a prediction of infection incidence over 5%, the following cutaneous oncologic procedures warrant consideration of oral antibiotic wound infection prophylaxis: all procedures below the knee, wedge excisions of lip and ear, all skin grafts, and lesions in the groin. Other than under these circumstances, surgery to the nose, ear, fingers, lips, skin flap surgery, and surgery on diabetics, smokers, and those on anticoagulants have previously been considered for wound infection prophylaxis but do not warrant such intervention based on our data. The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.

Update on the Use of Antibiotics in Cutaneous Surgery

BACKGROUND

Antibiotics are often prescribed in perioperative settings, including dermatologic surgery. Given the continued evolution in the breadth and complexity of cutaneous procedures performed and inevitable localized or distant infections that occasionally occur, it seems prudent to periodically evaluate findings and recommendations from the literature regarding the use of antibiotics in cutaneous surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature review from English-language sources from the past 30 years, especially focusing on sources from the past 5 to 10 years. Data were examined for a variety of cutaneous surgical procedures, routes of antibiotic administration, and consideration of both cutaneous and distant infections.

RESULTS

The literature suggests that, for most routine skin procedures, antibiotic use is probably not warranted for the prevention of surgical wound infection, endocarditis, and late prosthetic joint infections. During prolonged Mohs procedures, delayed repairs, grafts, takedowns of interpolation flaps, or any procedure that breaches a mucosal surface, the evidence is less clear, and decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis. Topical antibiotics are probably overused, although silver sulfadiazine may have an undeserved negative reputation among dermatologists. Systemic prophylactic antibiotics for laser resurfacing and liposuction appear not to be routinely necessary, although patients with known prior herpes infection likely should receive antiviral prophylaxis. The overall reported infection rates and infectious complications remain low in dermatologic surgery, and antibiotic therapy may be prescribed excessively or inappropriately as a result. CONCLUSION.: Antibiotics continue to be widely used, and through varying routes of administration, in the setting of dermatologic surgery. Prudent use of these agents is indicated in high-risk patients, certain anatomic locations, and the presence of overt infection. Additional studies may help clarify the most appropriate indications, and in which patient populations, in the future.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Dermatologic Surgery: Updated Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery is poorly understood, and data on its use are lacking. Prophylaxis is indicated for the prevention of endocarditis and prosthesis infection, as well as surgical site infection.

OBJECTIVE

We review essential considerations for the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery and provide clear guidelines for practical implementation.

METHODS

Guidelines were developed after review of the literature and consultation with infectious disease specialists and subspecialists in the areas of cardiac, orthopedic, and neurosurgical infectious disease at Mayo Clinic.

RESULTS

Three factors affect the decision to use prophylactic antibiotics in dermatologic surgery: (1) the underlying indication for prophylaxis (patient risk stratification), (2) the condition of the skin, and (3) the specific procedure planned. Thorough preoperative evaluation and surgical planning are critical in identifying and optimizing patient and environmental risk factors that may increase the risk of infection. Appropriate antibiotic selections with site-specific consideration and appropriate timing of antibiotic administration are key factors in providing effective prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

Low rates of infection associated with dermatologic surgical procedures warrant selective use of antibiotic prophylaxis. The proposed guidelines reflect current standards of practice.

Perioperative evaluation and management in dermatologic surgery

Thorough and efficient perioperative evaluation is mandatory for all patients undergoing dermatologic operation. Patients may present with concise or extensive medical histories, and an organized approach will focus attention on issues relevant to the patient's dermatologic disease and the planned surgical procedure. Management of common perioperative issues in a proactive and standardized manner, with opportunity to individualize decisions when clinical conditions indicate, is an efficient and optimal approach. This review highlights the efficient and thorough evaluation of perioperative issues and suggests guidelines for the optimal management of common perioperative issues, including cardiac devices, antibiotic prophylaxis, and anticoagulation.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with valvular heart defects undergoing dermatological surgery remains a confusing issue despite apparently clear guidelines

The guidelines pertaining to prescription of prophylactic antibiotics to prevent endocarditis during dermatological surgery appear clear and well-documented. The British Society for Dermatological Surgery, in agreement with the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, state that antibiotic prophylaxis for endocarditis is not required for routine dermatological surgery procedures even in the presence of a pre-existing heart lesion. Pre-existing cardiac lesions include prosthetic valves, history of bacterial endocarditis, congenital cardiac malformation, rheumatic or other acquired valvular dysfunction, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or mitral valve prolapse with regurgitation. It is important to distinguish between antibiotic prophylaxis for wound infection and that for bacterial endocarditis. Routine procedures, such as punches, shaves, curettage and simple excisions, performed on clean intact skin have an extremely low risk of wound infection (1-4%). The risk of wound infection increases to 5-15% with clean-contaminated skin surgery that includes procedures involving eroded or ulcerated skin, respiratory or buccal mucosa, flexural areas and protracted procedures such as Mohs' micrographic surgery. In such cases, antibiotic prophylaxis may be considered in patients with a cardiac lesion because a wound infection may result in bacteraemia and subsequent endocarditis. This should therefore not be considered 'routine' dermatological surgery. In contaminated, dirty and/or infected classes of wounds the risk of wound infection is higher (> 25%). Elective skin surgery should be postponed if possible until the wound infection is treated with therapeutic antibiotics.

A prospective study of the incidence of complications associated with dermatological surgery

BACKGROUND

Dermatological surgery is a relatively new and expanding subspecialty within dermatology. Little information is available about complications in this kind of surgery in the European setting.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of anaesthetic, haemorrhagic and infectious complications in dermatological surgery and to highlight the factors associated with these complications.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively over a 3-month period for all surgical procedures performed by a network of dermatologists (n = 84 dermatologists) in France, including the excision of all benign or malignant tumours but excluding sebaceous cysts and pyodermas. Information was collected regarding dermatologists, patients, procedures and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 3788 surgical procedures were available for review; 236 complications, mostly minor, occurred in a total of 213 surgical procedures (6%), bleeding being the most common (3%). Vaso-vagal syncope was the main anaesthetic complication (51 of 54). Infectious complications occurred in 79 patients (2%). Superficial suppuration accounted for 92% of surgical site infections. Only one patient had a systemic infection. Complications requiring additional antibiotic treatment or repeat surgery accounted for only 22 cases of 3788 (1%). No statistically significant correlation was found with the characteristics of the dermatologists, especially with respect to their training or amount of surgical experience. Similarly, no link could be established between complications and surgical conditions. Multivariate analysis showed that anaesthetic or haemorrhagic complications were independent factors for infectious complications. Sex, administration of an anticoagulant or immunosuppressant, type of procedure performed and duration exceeding 24 min were independent factors for haemorrhagic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows a low rate of complications associated with dermatological surgery performed by dermatologists under local anaesthesia on an outpatient basis.

Profilaxis antiherpética en intervenciones de dermoexfoliación facial

In recent years, a spectacular increase has taken place in the demand for techniques to improve the appearance of the skin, both for cosmetic and reparative purposes. The techniques used may have complications that interfere with the healing process, and therefore may affect the results from an aesthetic standpoint. The most significant complication is herpes simplex infection. Furthermore, accurate, early diagnosis of herpes infection makes greater individual and community control possible, thanks to the current availability of effective antiviral agents. The scientific literature relating to herpes simplex prophylaxis was reviewed, and this information was pooled with the knowledge and experience of a multidisciplinary group of experts. After all of this data was analyzed, the consensus was reached that all patients should be treated with specific oral medications for herpes simplex as a preventive measure.