Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial

A novel technique for the construction of an end ileostomy to prevent stoma outlet obstruction after rectal resection and total colectomy: a single-center retrospective study

PURPOSE

Stoma outlet obstruction (SOO) is an early postoperative complication of rectal cancer. We devised a novel surgical technique: end-ileostomy, to reduce SOO. Here, we describe the surgical technique used for constructing an end ileostomy and assess its impact on SOO.

METHODS

The subjects of this retrospective study were 78 patients who underwent low anterior resection or total colectomy with a defunctioning ileostomy (DI) between 2018 and 2022. The surgical procedure for end ileostomy can be summarized as follows: First, the ileum was separated using a linear stapler, approximately 30 cm from the Bauhin valve; then the opposite sides of the mesentery of the oral and anal ilea were sutured; and finally, end ileostomy was performed using standard techniques. End and loop ileostomies were performed in 34 and 44 patients, respectively. We assessed the independent risk factors for SOO.

RESULTS

SOO occurred in 12 patients (15.3%): 1 (2.9%) with an end ileostomy and 11 (25%) with a loop ileostomy. Multivariate analysis identified loop ileostomy as an independent risk factor for SOO (p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

End ileostomy construction is a useful and safe technique for reducing the incidence of SOO in defunctioning ileostomies following rectal resection.

Revisiting the value of dynamic assessment of postoperative C-reactive protein for early diagnosis of anastomotic fistulas in colorectal surgery with ileostomy

INTRODUCTION

Anastomotic fistula is the most feared complication in colorectal surgery. It requires early diagnosis followed by urgent treatment. In this study, we analyzed the dynamics of C-reactive protein (CRP) as a marker for early detection of anastomotic fistula.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted among 83 patients who underwent colorectal resection with anastomosis at the First Surgical Department, County Emergency University Clinical Hospital, Cluj Napoca, Romania. The CRP and leukocyte values were recorded at admission and on postoperative days 3, 5, 7, and 9. Total serum protein values were measured on postoperative days 3, 5, and 7, and albumin values were measured on postoperative day 3.

RESULTS

Only CRP values showed substantial postoperative variations. At postoperative days 3, 5, and 7, serum CRP levels in patients with anastomotic fistula were higher than those in patients without anastomotic fistula, with differences at postoperative days 5 (P <.001) and 7 (P <.001) being statistically significant.

DISCUSSION

A steady decrease in CRP values after postoperative day 3 is a strong sign that the development of anastomotic fistula is unlikely. An increase or a flat decrease in CRP value at postoperative days 5 and 7 with a serum value at or close to 100 mg/L suggests an increased probability for development of anastomotic fistula.

Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and its impact on survival outcomes in radical multivisceral surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: an AGO-OVAR.OP3/LION exploratory analysis

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage is a significant complication following bowel resection in cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer. Previous studies have highlighted the detrimental effects of anastomotic leakage on patients' postoperative course. However, there is still a lack of precise identification of the high-risk population and established strategies for preventing its occurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent bowel resection within the surgical phase III trial AGO-OVAR.OP3/LION investigating the impact of systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in cytoreductive surgery for primary ovarian cancer were included in this analysis. All patients in the AGO-OVAR.OP3/LION trial had undergone complete cytoreduction with no macroscopic residual disease. We analyzed the occurrence of anastomotic leakage regarding surgical procedure (non-lymphadenectomy vs. lymphadenectomy and non-stoma vs. stoma) using the Fisher test. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and its prognostic impact on survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall rate of anastomotic leakage was 7.1%. Notably, the Non-lymphadenectomy subgroup had a lower anastomotic leakage rate of 3.0% compared to the lymphadenectomy subgroup (11.2%, P = 0.005). The use of protective stoma placement resulted in an anastomotic leakage rate of 5.5% regardless of lymphadenectomy compared to the Non-Stoma subgroup (7.5%, P = 0.78). Increased blood loss (odds ratio [OR] 1.04 per 100cc, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0001-1.09) and lymphadenectomy (OR 3.67, 95% CI 1.41-11.40) were associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leakage. Although anastomotic leakage demonstrated a numerical detrimental impact on median progression-free survival (PFS) (18 months with anastomotic leakage vs. 19 months with Non-anastomotic leakage, hazard ratio [HR] 0.86; 95% CI 0.5 to 1.4, P = 0.53) and median overall survival (OS) (31 months with anastomotic leakage vs. 58 months with Non-anastomotic leakage, HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.4 to 1.2, P = 0.17), the differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Anastomotic leakage rates were lower in the Non-lymphadenectomy arm, the current standard of care. Blood loss and lymphadenectomy, as surrogate markers for extensive surgery, were associated with increased risk for anastomotic leakage. These findings highlight the importance of strategies to reduce surgical complexity and perioperative risk to improve clinical outcomes.

Is a bridge (rod) necessary for loop ileostomy? A phase II randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

The value of a bridge in loop ileostomies is debated. We aimed to evaluate whether using a bridge when creating a loop ileostomy can reduce morbidity following an ileostomy.

METHODS

Patients who had a loop ileostomy after elective colorectal surgery from January 2016 to July 2022 were randomized in this multicenter phase 2 randomized superiority trial. The primary endpoint was the absence of postoperative stomal complications at 2 months and was assessed in a blinded fashion by a stoma therapist. Secondary endpoints were morbidity at 1 month and the STOMA-QOL score at 2 months.

RESULTS

During the study period, 67 patients were randomized to the bridge group and 63 to the no-bridge group. Epidemiological and perioperative data did not differ between the two groups. The stomal complication-free rate was 76% in the bridge group and 67% in the no-bridge group (p = 0.3). There was no difference in the distribution of complications at 1 month according to the Clavien-Dindo score (p = 0.2) or the STOMA-QOL score at 2 months (p = 0.4) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The bridge does not reduce the rate of stomatal complications, nor does it appear to reduce patients' quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02756273 (May 10, 2016).

The Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Compliance in Colorectal Surgery for Cancer

Background: This study aimed to assess the impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) compliance and to identify which components of this protocol are most likely to affect postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort evaluating patients who underwent elective colon resection. ERAS compliance was assessed based on adherence to the protocol components. The study examined the following outcomes: postoperative complications, readmission rates, mortality, conversion to open surgery, stoma creation, and length of hospital stay. Results: Of the 410 patients studied, 59% achieved ≥75% compliance. Comparison between compliance groups (<75% versus ≥75%) showed significant differences in overall complications (P = .002), severe complications (P = .001), and length of hospital stay (P < .001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting the absence of severe complications based on ERAS compliance was 0.677 (95% confidence interval: 0.602-0.752). Logistic regression analyses demonstrated that ERAS compliance was significantly associated with a reduced risk of severe complications (P < .001), as well as that the following items: avoiding prophylactic drains (P < .001), minimal use of postoperative opioids (P = .045), avoidance of postoperative salt and water overload (P < .001), postoperative nutritional support (P = .048), and early mobilization (P = .025). Conclusion: High ERAS compliance is associated with improved postoperative outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery. Key protocol components for preventing severe complications include avoiding prophylactic drains, minimal postoperative opioid use, avoiding salt and water overload, nutritional support, and early mobilization.

Increased risk of postoperative complications after delayed stoma reversal: a multicenter retrospective cohort study on patients undergoing anterior resection for rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Defunctioning stoma (DS) has been suggested to mitigate the consequences of anastomotic leak (AL) after low anterior resection. Stoma reversal (SR) is commonly delayed for nonmedical reasons in many healthcare systems. This study investigated the impact of the elapsed time from AR to SR on postoperative 90-day complications. The secondary aim was to explore the independent factors associated with a delayed SR. M&M: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included rectal cancer patients who underwent anterior resection (AR) and DS between 2014 and 2018. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the influence of the elapsed time from AR to SR on postoperative complications within 90 days.

RESULTS

Out of 905 patients subjected to AR with DS, 116 (18%) patients experienced at least one postoperative 90-day complication after SR. Multivariable analysis revealed an association between the elapsed time to SR and complications within 90 days from SR (OR 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.04). The association with SR complications was further highlighted in patients who experienced delayed SR > 6 months after AR (OR 1.73; 95% CI, 1.04-2.86). AL after AR and nodal disease were both related to delayed SR.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that postoperative 90-day complications are associated with the time elapsed to SR. These findings emphasize the importance of early SR, preferably within 6 months, to prevent complications.

Comparison of the C-REX LapAid and Circular Stapled Colorectal Anastomoses in an Experimental Model

INTRODUCTION

The rate of colorectal anastomotic leakage has remained unchanged for the last decades. The limitations of current anastomotic methods have generated an interest in alternative anastomotic techniques, such as compression anastomosis. The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the early mechanical strength in left colonic anastomoses, comparing C-REX LapAid and circular stapled anastomotic methods.

METHODS

A total of 48 pigs underwent open sigmoid resection with end-to-end colorectal anastomoses 15 cm above the anal verge, where 21 anastomoses were constructed with traditional circular staplers and 27 with the C-REX LapAid device. Bursting pressure was measured at different time intervals postoperatively through an attached anal plug while the upper limit of the bowel segment was closed with a bowel clamp. Early histological changes were assessed 6-24 h after the anastomotic formation with vascular CD31 and collagen Masson Trichrom staining.

RESULTS

All animals recovered uneventfully after the surgical procedure. The circular stapled anastomoses exhibited a median bursting pressure of 36 mbar (28-64) at 1 h, 45 mbar (43-69) at 6 h, and 145 mbar (85-185) 12 h after surgery. In comparison, the C-REX LapAid anastomoses demonstrated a median bursting pressure of 195 mbar (180-240) at 1 h, 192 mbar (180-220) at 6 h, and 180 mbar (160-180) 12 h after surgery, representing a 2-5-fold higher median bursting pressure in the early anastomotic healing phase. Early microscopic architecture showed little evidence of vascular and collagen formation.

CONCLUSION

The novel C-REX LapAid device demonstrated significantly higher bursting pressure values in the early phase of the anastomotic healing process compared to the circular stapled method. A clinical study to further verify the benefits of C-REX LapAid is warranted.

INTRODUCTION

The rate of colorectal anastomotic leakage has remained unchanged for the last decades. The limitations of current anastomotic methods have generated an interest in alternative anastomotic techniques, such as compression anastomosis. The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the early mechanical strength in left colonic anastomoses, comparing C-REX LapAid and circular stapled anastomotic methods.

METHODS

A total of 48 pigs underwent open sigmoid resection with end-to-end colorectal anastomoses 15 cm above the anal verge, where 21 anastomoses were constructed with traditional circular staplers and 27 with the C-REX LapAid device. Bursting pressure was measured at different time intervals postoperatively through an attached anal plug while the upper limit of the bowel segment was closed with a bowel clamp. Early histological changes were assessed 6-24 h after the anastomotic formation with vascular CD31 and collagen Masson Trichrom staining.

RESULTS

All animals recovered uneventfully after the surgical procedure. The circular stapled anastomoses exhibited a median bursting pressure of 36 mbar (28-64) at 1 h, 45 mbar (43-69) at 6 h, and 145 mbar (85-185) 12 h after surgery. In comparison, the C-REX LapAid anastomoses demonstrated a median bursting pressure of 195 mbar (180-240) at 1 h, 192 mbar (180-220) at 6 h, and 180 mbar (160-180) 12 h after surgery, representing a 2-5-fold higher median bursting pressure in the early anastomotic healing phase. Early microscopic architecture showed little evidence of vascular and collagen formation.

CONCLUSION

The novel C-REX LapAid device demonstrated significantly higher bursting pressure values in the early phase of the anastomotic healing process compared to the circular stapled method. A clinical study to further verify the benefits of C-REX LapAid is warranted.

Usefulness of a negative pressure wound therapy system for stoma closure

OBJECTIVE

Although wound infection rates after stoma closure have decreased, they remain high. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for stoma closure wounds can shorten healing time for many wound types. The PICO (Smith+Nephew, UK) wound dressing, a single-use NPWT system that can be used for outpatients, was introduced at the Japan Community Health Care Organization Hokkaido Hospital, Japan in November 2017. We evaluated the effectiveness of this dressing in stoma closure wounds.

METHOD

We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent stoma closure between March 2012 and July 2021. We compared postoperative short-term outcomes (surgical site infection (SSI), number of pain medications, and postoperative hospital stay) by allocating the patients to one of two groups: purse-string closure or purse-string closure with PICO. The purse-string closure group (PC) underwent purse-string closure alone, while the other group underwent purse-string closure and PICO (PCP).

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were evaluated; 20 in the PC group and 15 in the PCP group. No significant differences in characteristics were noted between the groups. Comparisons between stoma closure techniques revealed that the PCP group had shorter hospital stays (p=0.04), lower SSI rates (p=0.04), and less pain medication (p<0.01) than the PC group. Comparisons between SSI occurrence revealed that the group of patients with an SSI had a higher number of colostomies compared with ileostomies (37.5% versus 0%, p<0.01, respectively), used more pain medication (p<0.01), and had longer hospital stays (p=0.04) than patients who did not have an SSI.

CONCLUSION

After stoma closure, combining PICO with purse-string closure may be effective in preventing SSI and controlling postoperative pain.

Early vs. Late Stoma Reversal After Open Low Anterior Resection Post-Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

Diversion stomas are done to protect the patients from anastomosis-related complications after low anterior resection, particularly after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Problems with these temporary stomas are the significant deterioration in quality of life along with medical and surgical complications. Diversion ileostomy is the most commonly performed diversion procedure. Reversal of stoma is usually done after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy. Studies looking into the safety of early stoma reversal have shown conflicting results. The objective of this work is to study the advantages, disadvantages, and complications associated with early ileostomy reversal when compared to late ileostomy reversal in patients undergoing stoma reversal that was done as part of open low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Total of 92 patients were recruited for the study during the time period March, 2018, to June, 2019; 12 patients did not fulfill the inclusion criteria. A total of 80 patients were analyzed, 39 of whom underwent early reversal and 41 underwent late reversal. All of whom were prospectively followed up to assess the quality of life and complications associated with early and late stoma reversals. Both groups of patients were similar in the baseline characteristics. Perioperative complications were found to be significantly increased in the late reversal group when compared to early reversal group (7 vs. 0 with P 0.043). Quality-of-life assessment showed significant improvement in patients who underwent early stoma reversal with significant improvement in raw score, functional score, and symptoms score (P < 0.001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was also not significantly delayed in the early reversal group. Early stoma reversal should be offered to patients after open low anterior resection post-NACTRT, as it is safer and associated with improvement in quality of life.

Long-term bowel function following delayed coloanal anastomosis: Analysis of a multicentric cohort study (GRECCAR)

AIM

Alteration of bowel function after delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCAA) might be a limitation to its utilization. Our aim was to assess the long-term bowel function of DCAA in a large multicentric cohort.

METHOD

All patients who underwent DCAA interventions at 29 GRECCAR-affiliated hospitals between 2010 and 2021 were retrospectively included. Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score or confection of a stoma due to poor bowel function was assessed in eligible patients. Good bowel function was defined by the preservation of bowel continuity with no LARS or a minor LARS.

RESULTS

Among the 385 eligible patients to assess long-term bowel continuity, 63% (n = 243) responded to the questionnaire or had a definitive stoma because of poor bowel function. After a median follow-up of 32 months, good bowel function was reported by 60% (n = 146) of patients (with no LARS 36% and minor LARS 24%), whereas 40% of patients (n = 146) had a poor bowel function including major LARS (36%) and definitive stoma due to poor bowel function (4%). No variables tested were predictive of a poor bowel function after DCAA, including a history of pelvic radiotherapy (P = 0.722), salvage DCAA after failure of a previous anastomosis (P = 0.755), presence of a diverting stoma (P = 0.556), occurrence of an anastomotic leakage (P = 0.416) and time interval from the DCAA to the bowel function assessment (P = 0.350).

CONCLUSIONS

No LARS or minor LARS was reached for 60% of patients after DCAA. Less than 5% of patients received a definitive stoma due to a poor bowel function.

SELective defunctioning Stoma Approach in low anterior resection for rectal cancer (SELSA): Protocol for a prospective study with a nested randomized clinical trial investigating stoma-free survival without major LARS following total mesorectal excision

AIM

Accumulated data suggest that routine use of defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer may cause kidney injury, bowel dysfunction and a higher risk of permanent stomas. We aim to study whether avoidance of a diverting stoma in selected patients is safe and reduces adverse consequences.

METHODS

SELSA is a multicentre international prospective observational study nesting an open-label randomized clinical trial. All patients with primary rectal cancer planned for low anterior resection are eligible. Patients operated with curative intent, aged <80 years, with an American Society of Anaesthesiologists' fitness grade I or II, and a low predicted risk of anastomotic leakage are eligible to 1:1 randomization between no defunctioning stoma (experimental arm) or a defunctioning stoma (control arm). The primary outcome is the composite measure of 2-year stoma-free survival without major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Secondary outcomes include anastomotic leakage, postoperative mortality, reinterventions, stoma-related complications, quality of life measures, LARS score, and permanent stoma rate. To be able to state superiority of any study arm regarding the main outcome, with 90% statistical power and assuming 25% attrition, we aim to enrol 212 patients. Patient inclusion will commence in the autumn of 2024.

CONCLUSION

The SELSA study is investigating a tailored approach to defunctioning stoma use in low anterior resection for rectal cancer in relation to the risk of anastomotic leakage. Our hypothesis is that long-term effects will favour the selective approach, enabling some patients to avoid a defunctioning stoma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Swedish Ethical Review Authority approval (2023-04347-01, 2024-02418-02 and 2024-03622-02), Regional Ethics Committee Denmark (H-24014463), and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06214988).

Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leak in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Retrospective Analysis

Introduction Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most severe complications following rectal cancer (RC) surgery, with significant implications for morbidity, mortality, and oncological outcomes. Identifying risk factors associated with AL may enhance surgical decision-making and improve patient prognosis. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including 42 adult patients who underwent RC resection at a hospital in Mexico City between January 2015 and December 2022. Demographic, clinical, pathological, and surgical variables were analyzed to assess their association with AL. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors. Results The overall incidence of AL was 11.9%, consistent with previous literature. Univariate analysis revealed no significant differences in patient-related factors such as age, BMI, ASA classification, diabetes mellitus, smoking, or biochemical markers (p>0.05). Treatment-related factors such as neoadjuvant therapy and diverting stoma (DS) placement did not show a significant association with AL. However, surgical factors played a crucial role: operative time was significantly longer in patients with AL (349.0 vs. 232.9 minutes, p=0.024), intraoperative blood loss was markedly higher (800.0 vs. 198.6 mL, p<0.001), and transfusion rates were elevated (60.0% vs. 13.5%, p=0.040). Tumor location in the middle rectum was more frequent among AL cases (60.0% vs. 18.9%, p=0.090). Postoperative complications were significantly more severe in patients with AL, with prolonged hospital stays (20.0 vs. 10.2 days, p=0.043) and increased reintervention rates (80.0% vs. 5.6%, p<0.001). In the logistic regression model, none of the analyzed variables reached statistical significance (p>0.99). However, operative time showed an odds ratio (OR) of 1.736 (p=0.997), suggesting that for each additional minute of surgery, the risk of AL could increase by 73.6%. Despite this trend, the wide confidence interval limits its precision and clinical applicability. Age showed an OR of 0.023 (p=0.998), potentially suggesting a 97.7% reduction in leakage risk for each additional year, although this result was not statistically significant and should be interpreted with caution. Conclusion Although no statistically significant risk factors were identified in the multivariate analysis, intraoperative variables such as prolonged surgical time, high blood loss, and transfusion requirement emerged as clinically relevant trends. These findings emphasize the need for optimizing surgical techniques and perioperative management to mitigate AL risk. Further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to validate these associations and improve risk stratification models.

Short-term outcomes of low anterior resection with and without ileostomy for low, mid and upper rectal cancers

Although the addition of an ileostomy to low anterior resection (LAR) may often be considered preventative of anastomotic leakage (AL), evidence that clearly demonstrates such benefit is lacking. This study aimed to identify the impact of adding an ileostomy upon AL and organ-space surgical site infection (SSI) rates in patients with lower, middle, or upper rectal cancer. This case-control study included rectal cancer patients who had undergone elective LAR in the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset between 2016 and 2022. Patients with lower, middle, and upper tumors were identified and analyzed according to whether an ileostomy was added or not. Patients' pre-, intra-, and short-term post-operative data were compared using univariable and multivariable methods. A total of 4048 patients (61.6% males) with a mean age of 60 years, whereof 1166 with lower, 1836 with middle, and 1046 with upper tumors were identified. An ileostomy was added in 2804 (69.3%) patients. Patients with upper tumors had an ileostomy added less frequently (78.5%vs 74.5% vs 49.9%, p < 0.001). The overall AL and organ-space SSI rates were 4.3% and 6.7%. There were no statistically significant differences in AL and organ-space SSI rates (requiring or not requiring re-intervention or re-operation) between patients with and without ileostomy regardless of tumor location. Multivariable logistic regression controlling for confounding variables showed no association between adding an ileostomy and AL and organ-space SSI rates (requiring or not requiring re-intervention or re-operation) regardless of tumor location. This case-control study did not find any evidence in support of a preventative impact upon AL and organ-space SSI rates of adding an ileostomy to LAR in patients with lower, middle, or upper rectal cancer.

Fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green for low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: a prospective before and after study

BACKGROUND

Inadequate bowel perfusion is among risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Perfusion can be assessed with indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG) during colon resections. Possible benefits from its systematic use in high-risk patients with rectal cancer remain inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical modifications induced by ICG assessment during rectal cancer surgery and associated anastomotic leaks.

METHODS

This prospective before and after cohort study was conducted in a single Canadian high-volume colorectal surgery center. Eligible patients were undergoing a low anterior resection for rectal cancer below 15 cm from the anal margin. Stapled and handsewn coloanal anastomoses were included. The experimental group was recruited prospectively, undergoing surgery using fluorescence angiography with ICG. The control group was built retrospectively from consecutive patients who had been operated on without ICG, prior to its implementation.

RESULTS

Each cohort included 113 patients. The use of ICG led to modifications from initial surgical plan in 10.6% of patients, with no occurrence of anastomotic leaks in this specific group. When comparing leak rates, using ICG seemed to be protective, but this could not be statistically proven, overall (13.3% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.07), nor for handsewn coloanal anastomoses (11.8% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.67). A lack of power could explain such non-significant results, especially with low overall anastomotic leak rates recorded.

CONCLUSION

ICG influenced ultimate proximal resection margin in a clinically relevant proportion of cases. It might be associated with reduced leak rates although not formally proven with this data. This technology is safe and easy to apply in high-volume colorectal centers.

Defunctioning Ileostomy After Low Anterior Resection of Rectum: Morbidity Related to Fashioning and Closure

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess any predisposing factors to the morbidity of fashioning and reversal of diverting ileostomy in a prospective cohort of patients who have undergone TME and low colo-rectal or colo-anal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients with rectal cancer undergoing low anterior resection and a defunctioning loop ileostomy in three surgical units from 2016 to 2020 were included in the study and retrospectively analyzed. Results: One hundred eighty-two patients from three centres were included. Ileostomy-related mortality was 0.5%, attributed to renal failure.. Ileostomy-related morbidity was 46%. Postoperative ileus was seen in 37.4%, and dehydration in 18.8% of the patients. The readmission rate for ileostomy-related reasons was 15.4%. Stoma care was problematic in 15.7% or poor in 7% of the cases. Advanced age, male gender and obesity were independent risk factors for ileostomy-related morbidity. Ileostomy was reversed in 165 patients. The morbidity in 165 patients was 16%. Ileus was seen in 10.3%, anastomotic leak in 4.8% and wound infection in 12.7% of the cases. One patient died because of an anastomotic leak. No predisposing factors that affect the outcomes of ileostomy closure were identified. Conclusions: Diverting ileostomy-related morbidity is high. Life threatening dehydration and renal failure from ileus is more commonly seen in elderly, male and obese patients and should be anticipated. Ileostomy closure-related morbidity is low.

Ghost-ileostomy versus conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer: results of a randomised controlled multicentre pilot trial (DRKS00013997)

PURPOSE

The objective of the current pilot trial was to evaluate whether ghost ileostomy is a safe alternative to the current standard of care in terms of a conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision (LAR/TME) for rectal cancer.

METHODS

This randomized controlled pilot trial included patients undergoing LAR/TME, randomly assigning them to ghost ileostomy or conventional loop ileostomy intraoperatively. Follow-up spanned 6 months, evaluating the following endpoints: comprehensive complication index (CCI), postoperative morbidity, transformation of ghost ileostomy, presence of ostomy at 6 months, Wexner score, and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 & CR29). Exploratory statistical analysis based on the intention-to-treat principle was conducted.

RESULTS

Recruiting 30 patients from May 2018 to September 2022, the trial was prematurely stopped due to slow recruitment. The mean CCI was comparable between groups at any point of time (at 6 months: 30.7 vs. 29.7, p = 0.889). There was no mortality and no need for creation of a terminal ostomy. Anastomotic leakage rates were similar in ghost ileostomy and loop ileostomy groups (p > 0.99). The ghost ileostomy was converted into a conventional loop ileostomy in 6 of 15 (40.0%) patients. Neither postoperative function, nor the overall quality of life showed significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Ghost ileostomy appears as a viable and safe option for selectively deciding ileostomy creation in LAR/TME for rectal cancer. However, challenges in patient selection, excluding those at high risk for anastomotic leakage, limit widespread application and call for optimization in future research.

TRIAL-REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register ( https://drks.de/ ): DRKS00013997; date of registration: April 9th 2018.

Low rectal resection for low rectal endometriosis and rectal adenocarcinoma: Are we discussing the same risks?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the rate and risk factors for anastomosis leakage in patients undergoing colorectal resection with low anastomosis for rectal endometriosis and rectal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study evaluating prospectively collected data was conducted. Patients undergoing colorectal resection for rectal endometriosis and rectal adenocarcinoma with low anastomosis (<7 cm from the anal verge [AV]) from September 2018 to January 2023 were included in the analysis. The main outcome was the rate of anastomosis leakage. A multivariate logistic regression was conducted to evaluate risk factors for anastomosis leakage in both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 159 patients underwent colorectal resection with low anastomosis due to rectal endometriosis (n = 99) and rectal adenocarcinoma (n = 60). Patients with endometriosis were significantly younger than those with adenocarcinoma (35.7 ± 5.1 vs 63.7 ± 12.6; P = 0.001). The leakage rate was similar between the endometriosis (n = 12, 12.1%) and adenocarcinoma (n = 9, 15.0%) patients (P = 0.621). The anastomosis height less than 5 cm from the AV (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 12.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.24-23.54) was significantly associated with the anastomosis leakage. Protective stoma was associated with the decrease of the leakage risk (aOR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01-0.72). The type of disease (rectal endometriosis or adenocarcinoma) was not associated with the anastomosis leakage (aOR 2.87, 95% CI 0.34-21.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the different pathogenesis, the risk of anastomotic leakage was found to be similar between patients with low rectal endometriosis and those with rectal adenocarcinoma. These results must be considered by the gynecologist and colorectal surgeon to deliver proper information before rectal surgery for endometriosis.

Quality of Reporting on Anastomotic Leaks in Colorectal Cancer Trials: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Although attempts have been made in the past to establish consensus regarding the definitions and grading of the severity of colorectal anastomotic leakage, widespread adoption has remained limited.

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review of the literature was conducted to examine the various elements used to report and define anastomotic leakage in colorectal cancer resections.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Database.

STUDY SELECTION

All published randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses containing data related to adult patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery and reporting anastomotic leakage as a primary or secondary outcome, with a definition of anastomotic leakage were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Definitions of anastomotic leakage, clinical symptoms, radiological modalities and findings, findings at reoperation, and grading terminology or classifications for anastomotic leakage.

RESULTS

Of the 471 articles reporting anastomotic leakage as a primary or secondary outcome, a definition was reported in 95 studies (45 randomized controlled trials, 13 systematic reviews, and 37 meta-analyses) involving a total of 346,140 patients. Of these 95 articles, 68% reported clinical signs and symptoms of anastomotic leakage, 26% biochemical criteria, 63% radiological modalities, 62% radiological findings, and 13% findings at reintervention. Only 45% (n = 43) of included studies reported grading of anastomotic leakage severity or leak classification, and 41% (n = 39) included a time frame for reporting.

LIMITATIONS

There was a high level of heterogeneity between the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This evidence synthesis confirmed incomplete and inconsistent reporting of anastomotic leakage across the published colorectal cancer literature. There is a great need to develop and implement a consensus framework for defining, grading, and reporting anastomotic leakage.

REGISTRATION

Prospectively registered at PROSPERO (ID 454660).

Analysis of decision-making factors for defunctioning ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery and their impact on perioperative recovery: a retrospective study of 1082 patients

OBJECTIVE

To explore the decision-making factors for defunctioning ileostomy (DI) after rectal cancer surgery and to analyze the impact of the DI on perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was conducted that included rectal cancer patients who underwent low anterior resection from January 2013 to December 2023. Among them, 33 patients did not undergo DI but with anastomotic leakage (AL) after surgery, and 1030 patients were without AL. Preoperative, operative and tumor factors between these two groups were compared to explore the decision-making factors for DI. Meanwhile, the differences of perioperative outcomes between the DI group of 381 cases and non-DI group of 701 cases were compared.

RESULTS

For preoperative factors, the proportions of male patients and preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in the AL with non-DI group were greater than those in the non-AL group (p < 0.05); for operative factors, the proportion of patients in the AL with non-DI group with a surgical time > 180 min were greater (p < 0.05); for tumor factors, the proportion of T3-4 stage was higher in the AL with non-DI group (p < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis revealed that male sex and preoperative CRT were the independent risk factors affecting DI. For perioperative outcomes, the DI did not reduce the incidence of all and symptomatic AL and non-AL postoperative complications (p > 0.05) but with 12.07% stoma-related complications, and increase hospitalization costs (p < 0.05); however, it can shorten the postoperative hospital stay, pelvic drainage tube removal time, and reduce the anal tube placement rate and readmission rate (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Male patients and preoperative CRT were the independent risk factors affect the decision of DI in our study, and DI can shorten the postoperative hospitalization, pelvic drainage tube removal time, and decrease the anal tube placement rate and readmission rate during the perioperative period but with a higher economic cost.

A novel circumferential continuous reinforcing suture for anastomosis after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer and sigmoid cancer: a retrospective case-controlled study

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a novel method for anastomosis reinforcement to minimize the occurrence of anastomotic complications after surgical resection of rectal and sigmoid cancer.

METHODS

We recruited 378 patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal anterior resection of rectal cancer and sigmoid cancer in SYSUCC. The occurrence rates of intraoperative bleeding, operation time, and postoperative anastomotic complications were compared between the treatment group receiving anastomotic reinforcement and the control group without anastomotic reinforcement.

RESULTS

The incidence of anastomotic leakage in the treatment group was significantly lower than that in the control group (1.59% vs. 11.64%, p < 0.001). Following the application of inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust for factors influencing the occurrence of anastomotic leakage, the incidence of anastomotic leakage remained significantly lower in the treatment group compared to the control group (2.54% vs. 12.08%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The circumferential continuous anastomosis reinforcing suture method, recommended for laparoscopic surgery for rectal and sigmoid cancer, has the potential to effectively minimize the occurrence of anastomotic complications.

Outcome of selective non-diverting low anterior resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery for proximal rectal cancer: A prospective case series

Background

Low anterior resection (LAR) is the gold standard for curative cancer treatment in the middle and upper rectum. In radically operated patients, the local recurrence rates with total mesorectal excision (TME) after 5 and 10 years was<10%, with 80% in 5 years survival. Anastomotic leakage (AL) affects 4%-20% of patients who underwent LAR. Based on some studies, there is a risk reduction of symptomatic AL after LAR and the need for reoperation in patients with a defunctioning stoma (DS), also known as diverting stoma. Ileostomy has many complications, such as skin irritation and leakage, dehydration, obstruction, and parastomal hernia. Considering the complications of defunctioning loop-ileostomy (DLI) we designed this study to evaluate noninserting stoma in a particular group of patients.

Methods

This retrospective cohort case series study utilized data of 20 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma with lesion>7 cm from anal verge in rectoscopy who underwent LAR after 28 sessions of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and 6 weeks of rehabilitation. All of the patients matched our criteria, so DLI was not performed on any of them.

Results

Among our 20 patients, four AL were happened (20%). C-reactive protein (CRP) on post-operation day (POD) six was valuable. Computed tomography (CT) scan was not used as a reliable modality in our study. In all patients with positive AL, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was useful and reported correctly, and direct vision of the anastomosis site by rigid rectoscopy was not safe enough to make decisions about it.

Conclusion

The leakage rate was not far from the average leakage rate in other studies. Then it seems it is possible to forget about defunctioning loop stoma (DLS) in safe cases to reduce the stoma complications. Due to our restricted case selection and our close observation protocol, we had no significant complications compared to other studies. According to this study, not inserting stoma in suitable cases with restricted protocol selection is possible, and the leakage rate is not higher in comparison with patients with stoma.

Local excision vs. proctectomy in patients with ypT0-1 rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: a propensity score matched analysis of the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate outcomes of organ preservation by local excision (LE) compared to proctectomy following neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) included patients with locally advanced non-metastatic rectal cancer (ypT0-1 tumors) treated with neoadjuvant therapy between 2004 and 2019. Outcomes of patients who underwent LE or proctectomy were compared. 1:1 propensity score matching including patient demographics, clinical and therapeutic factors was used to minimize selection bias. Main outcome was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

11,256 of 318,548 patients were included, 526 (4.6%) of whom underwent LE. After matching, mean 5-year OS was similar between the groups (54.1 vs. 54.2 months; p = 0.881). Positive resection margins (1.2% vs. 0.6%; p = 0.45), pathologic T stage (p = 0.07), 30-day mortality (0.6% vs. 0.6%; p = 1), and 90-day mortality (1.5% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.75) were comparable between the groups. Length of stay (1 vs. 6 days; p < 0.001) and 30-day readmission rate (5.3% vs. 10.3%; p = 0.02) were lower in LE patients. Multivariate analysis of predictors of OS demonstrated male sex (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.08-1.77; p = 0.009), higher Charlson score (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.29-1.79; p < 0.001), poorly differentiated carcinoma (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.08-2.39; p = 0.02), mucinous carcinoma (HR 3.53, 95% CI 1.72-7.24; p < 0.001), and pathological T1 (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.14-1.84; p = 0.002) were independent predictors of increased mortality. LE did not correlate with worse OS (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.42-1.97; p = 0.82).

CONCLUSION

Our findings show no overall significant survival difference between LE and total mesorectal excision, including ypT1 tumors. Moreover, patients with poorly differentiated or mucinous adenocarcinomas generally had poorer outcomes, regardless of surgical method.

Modified delayed coloanal anastomosis following TME for mid and low rectal cancer: 19 consecutive patients from a single center

Surgery and management of rectal cancer have made significant progress in recent decades. However, there is still no coloanal anastomosis technique that offers a good compromise between functionality and low morbidity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficiency of the modified delayed coloanal anastomosis (mDCA). In this retrospective study, we analyzed the morbi-mortality as well as functional outcomes of 19 patients treated with mDCA, out of 73 colorectal cancer patients treated at our institution from September 2021 to June 2023. The inclusion criteria were cancer of the mid and low rectum (tumor less than 10 cm from the anal verge). Morbidity represented by complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher was estimated at 5.2%. Only one patient experienced an asymptomatic anastomotic leak (AL) grade A. Ischemia of the colonic stump occurred in one patient, taken back to the OR on the 5th postoperative day. No stump retraction was noted. Anastomotic stenosis appeared in one patient (5.2%) during the 90-day postoperative period, and was treated by instrumental dilation. Perioperative mortality was nil. The mean St Marks incontinence score at 90 days was 13.2 points. At the 3-month follow-up, 15 patients (78.9%) had major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), three (15.7%) had minor LARS, and one patient (5.2%) had no LARS. None of the patients had a diversion loop ileostomy. The mDCA, by decreasing the rate of AL, without the need for diversion ileostomy, might be an interesting alternative to the conventional immediate coloanal anastomosis (ICA), for restoring the GI tract after proctectomy for cancer.

Long-Term Results of 2-Stage Turnbull-Cutait Pull-Through Coloanal Anastomosis for Low Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

In patients operated on for low rectal cancer, 2-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis provides benefits in terms of postoperative morbidity compared with standard hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis associated with diverting ileostomy and further ileostomy reversal.

OBJECTIVE

To compare long-term results of these 2 techniques after ultralow rectal resection for rectal cancer.

DESIGN, Setting, and Participants

In this randomized multicenter clinical trial, neither patients nor surgeons were blinded for technique. Patients were recruited in 3 centers. Patients undergoing ultralow anterior rectal resection needing hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis were randomly assigned to 2-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis (n = 46) or standard hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis associated with diverting ileostomy (n = 46).

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent ultralow anterior resection. Patients assigned to the 2-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through group underwent exteriorization of a segment of left colon through the anal canal. After 6 to 10 days, the exteriorized colon was resected and a delayed hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis performed. For patients assigned to standard coloanal anastomosis, the hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis was performed with diverting ileostomy during the first operation. Ileostomy closure was scheduled after adjuvant treatment was completed in about 6 to 8 months.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE

The study aimed to compare the differences between the 2 groups in terms of long-term surgery-related morbidity, functional, and oncological outcomes at 3 years postoperatively. Data were analyzed from October 1, 2018, through October 31, 2021.

RESULTS

The 92 patients randomized in the first study were included for the 3-year follow-up. The overall morbidity rate in the 2 groups showed that 15 patients (16.3%) had complications with a difference of 6.52 (95% CI, -8.93 to 21.79). Nine patients (19.6%) and 6 patients (13.0%) in the 2-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through group and hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis group, respectively, had complications without statistically significant differences (P = .57). Oncological results were comparable between the groups. Long-term fecal continence in the CCA and TCA groups, respectively, assessed using the Wexner Incontinence Score was 10.9 (5.50-15.5) vs 13.0 (7.25-16.0; P = .92), Low Anterior Resection Syndrome score was 32.0 (21.0-37.0) vs 34.0 (23.2-38.5; P = .76), and Colorectal Functional Outcome score was 38.5 (23.0-47.1) vs 40.8 (23.3-58.2; P = .30).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, after a 3-year follow-up period, 2-stage Turnbull-Cutait anastomosis for ultralow rectal cancer could be considered as a surgical alternative that has the valuable benefit of avoiding a temporary stoma with similar results in terms of morbidity, fecal continence, patient satisfaction, quality of life, and oncological outcomes when compared with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis with ileostomy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01766661.

Nursing Care of Patients Managed With a Defunctioning Tube Ileostomy: An Exploratory Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to describe nurses' experiences of caring for patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgery to create a spontaneously closed defunctioning tube ileostomy after low anterior resection.

DESIGN

Exploratory, descriptive study.

SUBJECTS AND SETTINGS

Data were collected from 6 registered nurses specialized in Wound, Ostomy and Continence Care (WOC nurses). The patient cohort comprised 247 hospitalized patients with histologically confirmed colorectal cancer who underwent low anterior resection of the rectum and creation of a closed defunctioning tube ileostomy. The study setting was the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews and content analysis were used to collect and analyze data. The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Care nurses visited patient participants 1 week after hospital discharge and 1 to 2 times per week until the cannula was removed and the ostomy wound closed. Data were collected over a 6-month span after the surgery from January 2016 to December 2018.

RESULTS

Content analysis identified 7 management strategies unique to caring for patients with a closed defunctioning tube ileostomy. They are: (1) cannula fixation (securement); (2) maintaining inflation of the cannular balloon to prevent fecal flow into the distal bowel, (3) cannular patency, (4) dietary advice for prevention of cannular blockage, (5) selecting an ostomy pouching system, (6) patient education, and (7) care during and following cannula removal (extubation).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified 7 areas of nursing care unique to the closed defunctioning tube ileostomy that provide a basis for creating clinical guidelines for patients undergoing this procedure.

Prospective nutrition-inflammation markers for predicting early stoma-related complications in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing enterostomy

Background

Enterostomy is important for radical resection of colorectal cancer (CRC). Nevertheless, the notable occurrence of complications linked to enterostomy results in a reduction in patients' quality of life and impedes adjuvant therapy. This study sought to forecast early stoma-related complications (ESRCs) by leveraging easily accessible nutrition-inflammation markers in CRC patients.

Methods

This study involved 470 individuals with colorectal cancer who underwent intestinal ostomy at Changhai Hospital Affiliated with Naval Medical University as the internal cohort. Between January 2016 and December 2018, the patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into a primary training group and a secondary validation group, with a ratio of 2:1 being upheld. The research encompassed collecting data on each patient's clinical and pathological status, along with preoperative laboratory results. Independent risk factors were identified through Lasso regression and multivariate analysis, leading to the development of clinical models represented by a nomogram. The model's utility was assessed using decision curve analysis, calibration curve, and ROC curve. The final model was validated using an external validation set of 179 individuals from January 2015 to December 2021.

Results

Among the internal cohort, stoma complications were observed in 93 cases. Multivariate regression analysis confirmed that age, stoma site, and elevated markers (Mon, NAR, and GLR) in conjunction with diminished markers (GLB and LMR) independently contributed to an increased risk of ESRCs. The clinical model was established based on these seven factors. The training, internal, and external validation groups exhibited ROC curve areas of 0.839, 0.812, and 0.793, respectively. The calibration curve showed good concordance among the forecasted model with real incidence of ostomy complications. The model displayed outstanding predictive capability and is deemed applicable in clinical settings, as evidenced by Decision Curve Analysis.

Conclusion

This study identified nutrition-inflammation markers (GLB, NAR, and GLR) in combination with demographic data as crucial predictors for forecasting ESRCs in colorectal cancer patients. A novel prognostic model was formulated and validated utilizing these markers.

Implementing a no-drain policy for extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis in a real-life setting: analysis of outcomes and surgeons' adherence

AIM

Recent evidence has questioned the usefulness of anastomotic drain (AD) after low anterior resection (LAR). However, the implementation and adoption of a no-drain policy are still poor. This study aims to assess the clinical outcomes of the implementation of a no-drain policy for rectal cancer surgery into a real-life setting and the adherence of the surgeons to such policy.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent elective minimally invasive LAR between January 2015 and December 2019 at two tertiary referral centers. In 2017, both centers implemented a policy aimed at reducing the use of AD. Patients were retrospectively categorized into two groups: the drain policy (DP) group, comprising patients treated before 2017, and the no-drain policy (NDP) group, consisting of patients treated from 2017 onwards. The endpoints were the rate of anastomotic leak (AL) and of related interventions.

RESULTS

Among the 272 patients included, 188 (69.1%) were in the NDP group, and 84 (30.9%) were in the DP group. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. AL rate was 11.2% in the NDP group compared to 10.7% in the DP group (p = 1.000), and the AL grade distribution (grade A, 19.1% (4/21) vs 28.6% (2/9); grade B, 28.6% (6/21) vs 11.1% (1/9); grade C, 52.4% (11/21) vs 66.7% (6/9), p = 0.759) did not significantly differ between the groups. All patients with symptomatic AL and AD underwent surgical treatment for the leak, while those with symptomatic AL in the NPD group were managed with surgery (66.7%), endoscopic (19.0%), or percutaneous (14.3%) interventions. Postoperative outcomes were similar between the groups. Three years after implementing the no-drain policy, AD was utilized in only 16.5% of cases, compared to 76.2% at the study's outset.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of a no-drain policy received a good adoption rate and did not affect negatively the surgical outcomes.

Nomogram for predicting the probability of rectal anastomotic re-leakage after stoma closure: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

In this study, we aimed to identify the risk factors in patients with rectal anastomotic re-leakage and develop a prediction model to predict the probability of rectal anastomotic re-leakage after stoma closure.

METHODS

This study was a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with rectal cancer who underwent surgery between January 2010 and December 2020. Among 3225 patients who underwent Total or Partial Mesorectal Excision (TME/PME) surgery for rectal cancer, 129 who experienced anastomotic leakage following stoma closure were enrolled. Risk factors for rectal anastomotic re-leakage were analyzed, and a prediction model was established for rectal anastomotic re-leakage.

RESULTS

Anastomotic re-leakage after stoma closure developed in 13.2% (17/129) of patients. Multivariable analysis revealed that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (odds ratio, 4.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-14.21; p = 0.03), blood loss > 50 ml (odds ratio, 4.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-15.63; p = 0.02), and intersphincteric resection (intersphincteric resection vs. low anterior resection: odds ratio, 6.85; 95% confidence interval, 2.01-23.36; p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for anastomotic re-leakage. A nomogram was constructed to predict the probability of anastomotic re-leakage, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.828 in the cohort. Predictive results correlated with the actual results according to the calibration curve.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, blood loss > 50 ml, and intersphincteric resection are independent risk factors for anastomotic re-leakage following stoma closure. The nomogram can help surgeons identify patients at a higher risk of rectal anastomotic re-leakage.

Practical use of transanal decompression tube following the repair of fourth-degree perineal tears associated with vaginal delivery

BACKGROUND

Fourth-degree perineal tears associated with vaginal delivery (PTAVD) occur in approximately 0.25 to 6% of vaginal deliveries. A persistent challenge in treating fourth-degree PTAVD is the high incidence of anastomotic leakage, leading to impaired quality of life, marked by incontinence, rectovaginal fistula, and painful sexual intercourse. Thus, effective interventions are necessary. Herein, we report our successful approach in repairing a fourth-degree PTAVD, involving the placement of a transanal decompression tube (TDT) during the early postoperative period.

CASE PRESENTATION

Five patients underwent the repair of fourth-degree PTAVD by suturing the mucosal and muscular layers of the rectum, and the vaginal wall in layers. Subsequently, a TDT was placed in the rectum, positioned 10-15 cm from the anal verge. The TDT was allowed to drain spontaneously without suction. Gastrografin enema examination was performed through a TDT, followed by a computed tomographic scan on postoperative days 3-4. After unfavorable complications were ruled out, the TDT was removed and the patients were transitioned to a normal diet.

RESULT

All patients showed favorable outcomes with no occurrence of vaginal fistula or incontinence.

CONCLUSION

This simple intervention demonstrates potential efficacy in reducing anastomotic leakage following the repair of fourth-degree PTAVD.

Machine learning model for prediction of permanent stoma after anterior resection of rectal cancer: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

The conversion from a temporary to a permanent stoma (PS) following rectal cancer surgery significantly impacts the quality of life of patients. However, there is currently a lack of practical preoperative tools to predict PS formation. The purpose of this study is to establish a preoperative predictive model for PS using machine learning algorithms to guide clinical practice.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we analyzed clinical data from a total of 655 patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer, with 552 patients from one medical center and 103 from another. Through machine learning algorithms, five predictive models were developed, and each was thoroughly evaluated for predictive performance. The model with superior predictive accuracy underwent additional validation using both an independent testing cohort and the external validation cohort. The Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach was employed to elucidate the predictive factors influencing the model, providing an in-depth visual analysis of its decision-making process.

RESULTS

Eight variables were selected for the construction of the model. The support vector machine (SVM) model exhibited superior predictive performance in the training set, evidenced by an AUC of 0.854 (95 % CI:0.803-0.904). This performance was corroborated in both the testing set and external validation set, where the model demonstrated an AUC of 0.851 (95%CI:0.748-0.954) and 0.815 (95%CI:0.710-0.919), respectively, indicating its efficacy in identifying the PS.

CONCLUSIONS

The model(https://yangsu2023.shinyapps.io/psrisk/) indicated robust predictive performance in identifying PS after anterior resection for rectal cancer, potentially guiding surgeons in the preoperative stratification of patients, thus informing individualized treatment plans and improving patient outcomes.

Peritoneal fluid indocyanine green test for diagnosis of gut leakage in anastomotic leakage rats and colorectal surgery patients

BACKGROUND

Application of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence has led to new developments in gastrointestinal surgery. However, little is known about the use of ICG for the diagnosis of postoperative gut leakage (GL). In addition, there is a lack of rapid and intuitive methods to definitively diagnose postoperative GL.

AIM

To investigate the effect of ICG in the diagnosis of anastomotic leakage in a surgical rat GL model and evaluate its diagnostic value in colorectal surgery patients.

METHODS

Sixteen rats were divided into two groups: GL group (n = 8) and sham group (n = 8). Approximately 0.5 mL of ICG (2.5 mg/mL) was intravenously injected postoperatively. The peritoneal fluid was collected for the fluorescence test at 24 and 48 h. Six patients with rectal cancer who had undergone laparoscopic rectal cancer resection plus enterostomies were injected with 10 mL of ICG (2.5 mg/mL) on postoperative day 1. Their ostomy fluids were collected 24 h after ICG injection to identify the possibility of the ICG excreting from the peripheral veins to the enterostomy stoma. Participants who had undergone colectomy or rectal cancer resection were enrolled in the diagnostic test. The peritoneal fluids from drainage were collected 24 h after ICG injection. The ICG fluorescence test was conducted using OptoMedic endoscopy along with a near-infrared fluorescent imaging system.

RESULTS

The peritoneal fluids from the GL group showed ICG-dependent green fluorescence in contrast to the sham group. Six samples of ostomy fluids showed green fluorescence, indicating the possibility of ICG excreting from the peripheral veins to the enterostomy stoma in patients. The peritoneal fluid ICG test exhibited a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 83.3% for the diagnosis of GL. The positive predictive value was 71.4%, while the negative predictive value was 100%. The likelihood ratios were 6.0 for a positive test result and 0 for a negative result.

CONCLUSION

The postoperative ICG test in a drainage tube is a valuable and simple technique for the diagnosis of GL. Hence, it should be employed in clinical settings in patients with suspected GL.

Updated evidence of the effectiveness and safety of transanal drainage tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal low anterior resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUNDS

Anastomotic leakage (AL) represents a major complication after rectal low anterior resection (LAR). Transanal drainage tube (TDT) placement offers a potential strategy for AL prevention; however, its efficacy and safety remain contentious.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were used to evaluate the influence of TDT subsequent to LAR as part of the revision of the surgical site infection prevention guidelines of the Japanese Society of Surgical Infectious Diseases (PROSPERO registration; CRD42023476655). We searched each database, and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OBSs) comparing TDT and non-TDT outcomes. The main outcome was AL. Data were independently extracted by three authors and random-effects models were implemented.

RESULTS

A total of three RCTs and 18 OBSs were included. RCTs reported no significant difference in AL rate between the TDT and non-TDT groups [relative risk (RR): 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42-1.15]. OBSs reported that TDT reduced AL risk [odds ratio (OR): 0.45, 95% CI 0.31-0.64]. In the subgroup excluding diverting stoma (DS), TDT significantly lowered the AL rate in RCTs (RR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.99) and OBSs (OR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.62). Reoperation rates were significantly lower in the TDT without DS groups in both RCTs (RR: 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.94) and OBSs (OR: 0.40, 95% CI 0.24-0.66). TDT groups exhibited a higher anastomotic bleeding rate only in RCTs (RR: 4.28, 95% CI 2.14-8.54), while shorter hospital stays were observed in RCTs [standard mean difference (SMD): -0.44, 95% CI -0.65 to -0.23] and OBSs (SMD: -0.54, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.11) compared with the non-TDT group.

CONCLUSIONS

A universal TDT placement cannot be recommended for all rectal LAR patients. Some patients may benefit from TDT, such as patients without DS creation. Further investigation is necessary to identify the specific beneficiaries.

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome following Restorative Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: Can the Surgeon Have Any Meaningful Impact?

Postoperative bowel dysfunction following restorative proctectomy, commonly referred to as Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS), is a common long term sequela of rectal cancer treatment. While many of the established risk factors for LARS are non-modifiable, others may be well within the surgeon's control. Several pre-, intra-, and postoperative decisions may have a significant impact on postoperative bowel function. Some of these factors include the extent of surgical resection, surgical approach, choice of anastomotic reconstruction, and use of fecal diversion. This review article summarizes the available evidence regarding how surgical decision-making can affect postoperative bowel function.

Turnbull-Cutait pull-through coloanal anastomosis versus standard coloanal anastomosis plus diverting ileostomy for low anterior resection: a meta-analysis and systematic review

PURPOSE

Coloanal anastomosis with loop diverting ileostomy (CAA) is an option for low anterior resection of the rectum, and Turnbull-Cutait coloanal anastomosis (TCA) regained popularity in the effort to offer patients a reconstructive option. In this context, we aimed to compare both techniques.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus were searched for studies published until January 2024. Odds ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled with a random-effects model. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q test and I2 statistics, with p-values inferior to 0.10 and I2 >25% considered significant. Statistical analysis was conducted in RStudio version 4.1.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Registered number CRD42024509963.

RESULTS

One randomized controlled trial and nine observational studies were included, comprising 1,743 patients, of whom 899 (51.5%) were submitted to TCA and 844 (48.5%) to CAA. Most patients had rectal cancer (52.2%), followed by megacolon secondary to Chagas disease (32.5%). TCA was associated with increased colon ischemia (OR 3.54; 95% CI 1.13 to 11.14; p < 0.031; I2 = 0%). There were no differences in postoperative complications classified as Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb, anastomotic leak, pelvic abscess, intestinal obstruction, bleeding, permanent stoma, or anastomotic stricture. In subgroup analysis of patients with cancer, TCA was associated with a reduction in anastomotic leak (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.97 p = 0.04; I2 = 34%).

CONCLUSION

TCA was associated with a decrease in anastomotic leak rate in subgroups analysis of patients with cancer.

Ultra-minimally invasive endoscopic techniques and colorectal diseases: Current status and its future

Colorectal diseases are increasing due to altered lifestyle, genetic, and environmental factors. Colonoscopy plays an important role in diagnosis. Advances in colonoscope (ultrathin scope, magnetic scope, capsule) and technological gadgets (Balloon assisted scope, third eye retroscope, NaviAid G-EYE, dye-based chromoendoscopy, virtual chromoendoscopy, narrow band imaging, i-SCAN, etc.) have made colonoscopy more comfortable and efficient. Now in-vivo microscopy can be performed using confocal laser endomicroscopy, optical coherence tomography, spectroscopy, etc. Besides developments in diagnostic colonoscopy, therapeutic colonoscopy has improved to manage lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding, obstruction, perforations, resection polyps, and early colorectal cancers. The introduction of combined endo-laparoscopic surgery and robotic endoscopic surgery has made these interventions feasible. The role of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of colorectal diseases is also increasing day by day. Hence, this article is to review cutting-edge developments in endoscopic principles for the management of colorectal diseases.

Using preoperative C-reactive protein levels to predict anastomotic leaks and other complications after elective colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

While postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) is used routinely as an early indicator of anastomotic leak (AL), preoperative CRP remains to be established as a potential predictor of AL for elective colorectal surgery. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to examine the association between preoperative CRP and postoperative complications including AL.

METHOD

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases were searched. Studies with reported preoperative CRP values and short-term surgical outcomes after elective colorectal surgery were included. An inverse variance random effects meta-analysis was performed for all meta-analysed outcomes to determine if patients with or without complications and AL differed in their preoperative CRP levels. Risk of bias was assessed with MINORS and certainty of evidence with GRADE.

RESULTS

From 1945 citations, 23 studies evaluating 7147 patients were included. Patients experiencing postoperative infective complications had significantly greater preoperative CRP values [eight studies, n = 2421 patients, mean difference (MD) 8.0, 95% CI 3.77-12.23, p < 0.01]. A significant interaction was observed with subgroup analysis based on whether patients were undergoing surgery for inflammatory bowel disease (X2 = 8.99, p < 0.01). Preoperative CRP values were not significantly different between patients experiencing and not experiencing AL (seven studies, n = 3317, MD 2.15, 95% CI -2.35 to 6.66, p = 0.35), nor were they different between patients experiencing and not experiencing overall postoperative morbidity (nine studies, n = 2958, MD 4.54, 95% CI -2.55 to 11.62, p = 0.31) after elective colorectal surgery.

CONCLUSION

Higher preoperative CRP levels are associated with increased rates of overall infective complications, but not with AL alone or with overall morbidity in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

SafeHeal Colovac Colorectal Anastomosis Protection Device evaluation (SAFE-2) pivotal study: an international randomized controlled study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Colovac Colorectal Anastomosis Protection Device

AIM

Although proximal faecal diversion is standard of care to protect patients with high-risk colorectal anastomoses against septic complications of anastomotic leakage, it is associated with significant morbidity. The Colovac device (CD) is an intraluminal bypass device intended to avoid stoma creation in patients undergoing low anterior resection. A preliminary study (SAFE-1) completed in three European centres demonstrated 100% protection of colorectal anastomoses in 15 patients, as evidenced by the absence of faeces below the CD. This phase III trial (SAFE-2) aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the CD in a larger cohort of patients undergoing curative rectal cancer resection.

METHODS

SAFE-2 is a pivotal, multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the CD arm or the diverting loop ileostomy arm, with a recruitment target of 342 patients. The co-primary endpoints are the occurrence of major postoperative complications within 12 months of index surgery and the effectiveness of the CD in reducing stoma creation rates. Data regarding quality of life and patient's acceptance and tolerance of the device will be collected.

DISCUSSION

SAFE-2 is a multicentre randomized, control trial assessing the efficacy and the safety of the CD in protecting low colorectal anastomoses created during oncological resection relative to standard diverting loop ileostomy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05010850.

Patient management after primary rectal cancer diagnosis. Special focus on surgical treatment for non-metastatic disease

Background: Rectal cancer is a public health priority. Primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the quality of care for non-metastatic rectal cancer using process and outcome indicators. Delay of management, length of stay and readmission rate, sphincter preservation, morbidity, number of examined lymph nodes, mortality, overall and disease-free survivals were evaluated. Secondary objectives were to estimate the relationship between possible predictive parameters for (1) anastomotic leakage (logistic regression), (2) overall or disease-free survivals (cox regression).Methods: We performed a retrospective study on 312 consecutive patients diagnosed with primary rectal cancer between 2016 and 2019. We focused on the 163 patients treated by surgery for non-metastatic cancer.Results: The treatment began within 33 days (range 0-264) after incidence, resection rate was 67%. Digestive continuity rate in lower, middle and upper rectum was 30%, 87% and 96%. Median of 14 lymph nodes (range 1-46) was analyzed. Length of stay and readmission rate were 11 days (range 3-56) and 4%, respectively. Within 90 postoperative days, clinical anastomotic leakage occurred in 9.2% of cases, major morbidity rate was 17%, mortality 1.2%. Multivariate analysis revealed that stoma decreased the risk of anastomotic leakage [hazard ratio: 0.16; 95% confidence intervals: 0.04-0.63; p = 0.008]. The 5-year overall survival after surgery was 85 ± 4%, disease-free survival 83 ± 4%. Patients with major complications, male gender and R1/R2 resection margin had a poorer prognosis.Conclusion: This work showed encouraging results in rectal cancer treatment in our institution, our results were in line with recommendations at the time.

Meta-analysis: loop ileostomy versus colostomy to prevent complications of anterior resection for rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Anastomotic leakage is a serious complication of colorectal cancer surgery, prolonging hospital stays and impacting patient prognosis. Preventive colostomy is required in patients at risk of anastomotic fistulas. However, it remains unclear whether the commonly used loop colostomy(LC) or loop ileostomy(LI) can reduce the complications of colorectal surgery. This study aims to compare perioperative morbidities associated with LC and LI following anterior rectal cancer resection, including LC and LI reversal.

METHODS

In this meta-analysis, the Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for prospective cohort studies, retrospective cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on perioperative morbidity during stoma development and reversal up to July 2023, The meta-analysis included 10 trials with 2036 individuals (2 RCTs and 8 cohorts).

RESULTS

No significant differences in morbidity, mortality, or stoma-related issues were found between the LI and LC groups after anterior resection surgery. However, patients in the LC group exhibited higher rates of stoma prolapse (RR: 0.39; 95%CI: 0.19-0.82; P = 0.01), retraction (RR: 0.45; 95%CI: 0.29-0.71; P < 0.01), surgical site infection (RR: 0.52; 95%CI: 0.27-1.00; P = 0.05) and incisional hernias (RR: 0.53; 95%CI: 0.32-0.89; P = 0.02) after stoma closure compared to those in the LI group. Conversely, the LI group showed higher rates of dehydration or electrolyte imbalances(RR: 2.98; 95%CI: 1.51-5.89; P < 0.01), high-output(RR: 6.17; 95%CI: 1.24-30.64; P = 0.03), and renal insufficiency post-surgery(RR: 2.51; 95%CI: 1.01-6.27; P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our study strongly recommends a preventive LI for anterior resection due to rectal cancer. However, ileostomy is more likely to result in dehydration, renal insufficiency, and intestinal obstruction. More multicenter RCTs are needed to corroborate this.

Comparison of purse-string technique vs linear suture for skin closure after ileostomy reversal. A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Protective stoma after rectal surgery has been associated with important complications. The most common is surgical site infection (SSI) high rates after stoma reversal reported in literature. Our study compared the rate of SSI of two skin closure techniques, linear closure, and purse string closure.

METHODS

We carried out a single center, prospective, randomized controlled trial in the Department of Colorectal Surgery of Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico of Rome between January 2018 through December 2021, to compare LC vs PS closure of ileostomy sites.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients (53.84% male) with a mean age of 65.68 ± 14.33 years were finally evaluated in the study. 58 patients were included in the PS group and 59 patients in the LC one. There was a marked difference in the SSI rate between the two arms of the study: 3 of 58 patients in the purse-string arm versus 11 of 59 in the control arm (p = 0.043). The outcome of cosmesis was also higher in PS, with a statistical significance (mean ± DS 4,01 ± 0,73 for PS group vs mean ± DS 2,38 ± 0,72 for LC group, p < 0,001).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that the PS technique had a significantly lower incidence of stoma site SSI compared with LC technique. Our findings are in line with other randomized studies and suggest that PS closure could be considered as standard of care for wound closure after ileostomy reversal.

Clinical risk factors and Risk assessment model for Anastomotic leakage after Rectal cancer resection

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most serious complication after rectal cancer surgery. Risk factors associated with AL have been documented in previous studies; however, the consensus is still lacking. In this retrospective study, we aimed to identify risk factors for AL after rectal cancer resection and to create an accurate and effective tool for predicting the risk of this complication.

METHODS

The study cohort comprised of 276 patients with rectal cancer who had undergone anterior resection between 2015 and 2020. Twenty-four selected variables were assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify independent risk factors of AL. A risk assessment model for predicting the risk of AL was established on the basis of the regression coefficients of each identified independent risk factor.

RESULTS

Anastomotic leakage occurred in 20 patients (7.2%, 20/276). Multivariate analysis identified the following variables as independent risk or protective factors of AL: perioperative ileus ( P < 0.001, odds ratio [OR] = 14.699), tumor size ≥5 cm ( P = 0.025, OR = 3.925), distance between tumor and anal verge <7.5 cm ( P = 0.045, OR = 3.512), obesity ( P = 0.032, OR = 7.256), and diverting stoma ( P = 0.008, OR = 0.143). A risk assessment model was constructed and patients were allocated to high-, medium-, and low-risk groups on the basis of risk model scores of 5-7, 2-4, and 0-1, respectively. The incidences of AL in these three groups were 61.5%, 11.9%, and 2.0%, respectively ( P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our risk assessment model accurately and effectively identified patients at high risk of AL and could be useful in aiding decision-making aimed at minimizing adverse outcomes associated with leakage.

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the risk factors of major complications after radical rectal cancer surgery

Purpose

The aim of this study was to establish a validated nomogram to predict risk factors for major post-operative complications in patients with rectal cancer (RC) by analyzing the factors contributing to major post-operative complications in RC patients.

Methods

We retrospectively collected baseline and surgical information on patients who underwent RC surgery between December 2012 and December 2022 at a single-center teaching hospital. The entire cohort was randomly divided into two subsets (60% of the data for development, 40% for validation). Independent risk factors for major post-operative complications were identified using multivariate logistic regression analyses, and predictive models were developed. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) to assess predictive probability, calibration curves were plotted to compare the predicted probability of the nomogram with the actual probability, and the clinical efficacy of the nomogram was assessed using decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

Our study included 3151 patients who underwent radical surgery for RC, including 1892 in the development set and 1259 in the validation set. Forty (2.1%) patients in the development set and 26 (2.1%) patients in the validation set experienced major post-operative complications. Through multivariate logistic regression analysis, age (p<0.01, OR=1.044, 95% CI=1.016-1.074), pre-operative albumin (p<0.01, OR=0.913, 95% CI=0.866-0.964), and open surgery (p<0.01, OR=2.461, 95% CI=1.284-4.761) were identified as independent risk factors for major post-operative complications in RC, and a nomogram prediction model was established. The AUC of the ROC plot for the development set was 0.7161 (95% Cl=0.6397-0.7924), and the AUC of the ROC plot for the validation set was 0.7191 (95% CI=0.6182-0.8199). The predicted probabilities in the calibration curves were highly consistent with the actual probabilities, which indicated that the prediction model had good predictive ability. The DCA also confirmed the good clinical performance of the nomogram.

Conclusion

In this study, a validated nomogram containing three predictors was created to identify risk factors for major complications after radical RC surgery. Due to its accuracy and convenience, it could contribute to personalized management of patients in the perioperative period.

Prophylactic defunctioning stomas improve clinical outcomes of anastomotic leak following rectal cancer resections: An analysis of the US Rectal Cancer Consortium

PURPOSE

Anastomotic leak (AL) is a complication of low anterior resection (LAR) that results in substantial morbidity. There is immense interest in evaluating immediate postoperative and long-term oncologic outcomes in patients who undergo diverting loop ileostomies (DLI). The purpose of this study is to understand the relationship between fecal diversion, AL, and oncologic outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study using patient data obtained from the US Rectal Cancer Consortium database compiled from six academic institutions. The study population included patients with rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing LAR. The primary outcome was the incidence of AL among patients who did or did not receive DLI during LAR. Secondary outcomes included risk factors for AL, receipt of adjuvant therapy, 3-year overall survival, and 3-year recurrence.

RESULTS

Of 815 patients, 38 (4.7%) suffered AL after LAR. Patients with AL were more likely to be male, have unintentional preoperative weight loss, and are less likely to undergo DLI. On multivariable analysis, DLI remained protective against AL (p < 0.001). Diverted patients were less likely to undergo future surgical procedures including additional ostomy creation, completion proctectomy, or pelvic washout for AL. Subgroup analysis of 456 patients with locally advanced disease showed that DLI was correlated with increased receipt of adjuvant therapy for patients with and without AL on univariate analysis (SHR:1.59; [95% CI 1.19-2.14]; p = 0.002), but significance was not met in multivariate models.

CONCLUSION

Lack of DLI and preoperative weight loss was associated with anastomotic leak. Fecal diversion may improve the timely initiation of adjuvant oncologic therapy. The long-term outcomes following routine diverting stomas warrant further study.

'Dumpling suture method' versus traditional suture method of protective loop ileostomy in laparoscopic anterior rectal resection with specimen extraction through stoma incision: a retrospective comparative cohort study

BACKGROUND

A diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) is performed in laparoscopic anterior rectal resection (LAR) surgery at high risk of anastomotic fistula. Minimally invasive surgery promotes postoperative recovery and cosmetics. To reduce abdominal trauma, specimen extraction through stoma incision (EXSI) is usually performed to avoid auxiliary abdominal incision with enlarged stomal incision. The traditional suture method (TSM) reduces the incision size by suturing the ends of the enlarged incision, leading to peristomal incisions and a higher risk of stomal complications. The study aimed to introduce the dumpling suture method (DSM) of PLI and compare this new method with TSM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors propose a novel stoma suture technique, which utilized a method of skin folding suture to reduce the enlarged incision size. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 71 consecutive patients with rectal cancer who underwent LAR-DLI with EXSI, and the intraoperative details and postoperative outcomes of the two groups were measured.

RESULTS

The DSM group showed a lower stomal complication rate (10.3 vs. 35.7%, P=0.016) than that of the TSM group. The scores of DET (Discoloration, Erosion, Tissue overgrowth), stomal pain, quality of life were all significantly lower in DSM group than in TSM group. In multivariate analysis, DSM was an independent protective factor for stoma-related complications. Operative time, time to first flatus, defecation and eat, nonstomal related postoperative complications were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

DSM utilizes a method of skin folding suture to reduce the enlarged incision size, which is safe and effective in reducing the incidence of peristomal skin infections and stomal complications. This procedure offers a novel suturing approach for loop ileostomy with enlarged incision, effectively reducing the postoperative trauma and incidence of stomal complications.

Anastomotic Leakage in Relation to Type of Mesorectal Excision and Defunctioning Stoma Use in Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer is more common after total mesorectal excision compared to partial mesorectal excision but might be mitigated by a defunctioning stoma.

OBJECTIVE

The aim is to assess how anastomotic leakage is affected by type of mesorectal excision and defunctioning stoma use.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study evaluating anastomotic leakage after anterior resection. Multivariable Cox regression with HRs and 95% CIs was used to contrast mesorectal excision types and defunctioning stoma use with respect to anastomotic leakage, with adjustment for confounding.

SETTINGS

This multicenter study included patients from 11 Swedish hospitals between 2014 and 2018.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer were included.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Anastomotic leakage rates within and after 30 days of surgery are described up to 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

Anastomotic leakage occurred in 24.2% and 9.0% of 1126 patients operated with total and partial mesorectal excision, respectively. Partial compared to total mesorectal excision was associated with a reduction in leakage, with an adjusted HR of 0.46 (95% CI, 0.29-0.74). Early leak rates within 30 days were 14.9% with and 12.5% without a stoma, whereas late leak rates after 30 days were 7.5% with and 1.9% without a stoma. After adjustment, defunctioning stoma was associated with a lower early leak rate (HR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.28-0.77). However, the late leak rate was nonsignificantly higher in patients with defunctioning stomas (HR 1.69; 95% CI, 0.59-4.85).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its retrospective observational study design.

CONCLUSIONS

Anastomotic leakage is common up to 1 year after anterior resection for rectal cancer, where partial mesorectal excision is associated with a lower leak rate. Defunctioning stomas seem to decrease the occurrence of leakage, although partially by only delaying the diagnosis. See Video Abstract .

FUGA ANASTOMTICA SEGN EL TIPO DE EXCISIN MESORRECTAL Y LA CONFECCIN DE OSTOMA DE PROTECCIN EN LA RESECCIN ANTERIOR POR CNCER DE RECTO

ANTECEDENTES:La fuga anastomótica después de una resección anterior por cáncer de recto es más frecuente después de la excisión total del mesorrecto comparada con la excisión parcial del mismo, pero podría mitigarse con la confección de ostomías de protección.OBJETIVO:El objetivo es evaluar cómo la fuga anastomótica se ve afectada según el tipo de excisión mesorrectal y la confección de una ostomía de protección.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohortes multicéntrico y retrospectivo que evalúa la fuga anastomótica después de la resección anterior. Se aplicó la regresión multivariada de Cox con los índices de riesgo (HR) y los intervalos de confianza (IC) al 95% para contrastar los tipos de excisión mesorrectal y el uso de otomías de protección con respecto a la fuga anastomótica, realizando ajustes respecto a las variables de confusión.AJUSTES:El presente estudio multicéntrico incluyó pacientes de 11 hospitales suecos entre 2014 y 2018.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron todos aquellos sometidos a resección anterior por cáncer de recto.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS:Las tasas de fuga anastomótica dentro y después de los 30 días de la cirugía fueron descritos hasta un año mas tarde al acto quirúrgico.RESULTADOS:La fuga anastomótica ocurrió en el 24,2% y el 9,0% de 1126 pacientes operados por excisión total y parcial del mesorrecto respectivamente.La excisión parcial del mesorrecto en comparación con la total se asoció con una reducción de la fuga, HR ajustado de 0,46 (IC del 95 %: 0,29 a 0,74). Las tasas de fuga temprana dentro de los 30 días fueron del 14,9 % con y el 12,5 % sin estoma, mientras que las tasas de fuga tardía después de 30 días fueron del 7,5 % con y el 1,9 % sin estoma.Después del ajuste de variables de confusión, las ostomías de protección se asociaron con una tasa de fuga temprana más baja (HR 0,47; IC 95 %: 0,28-0,77). Sin embargo, la tasa de fuga tardía no fue significativamente mayor en pacientes ostomizados (HR 1,69; IC 95%: 0,59-4,85).LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones del presente estudio estuvieron vinculadas con el diseño de tipo observacional y retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:La fuga anastomótica es común hasta un año después de la resección anterior por cáncer de recto, donde la excisión parcial del mesorrecto se asocia con una menor tasa de fuga. La confección de ostomías de protección parece disminuir la aparición de fuga anastomótica, aunque en parte sólo retrasen el diagnóstico. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

Is proctoscopy sufficient for the evaluation of colorectal anastomosis prior to ileostomy reversal? A nationwide retrospective analysis of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative group (SICO-CCN)

AIM

Several methods for assessing anastomotic integrity have been proposed, but the best is yet to be defined. The aim of this study was to compare the different methods to assess the integrity of colorectal anastomosis prior to ileostomy reversal.

METHOD

A retrospective cohort analysis on patients between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020 with a defunctioning stoma for middle and low rectal anterior resection was performed. A propensity score matching comparison between patients who underwent proctoscopy alone and patients who underwent proctoscopy plus any other preoperative method to assess the integrity of colorectal anastomosis prior to ileostomy reversal (transanal water-soluble contrast enema via conventional radiology, transanal water-soluble contrast enema via CT, and magnetic resonance) was performed.

RESULTS

The analysis involved 1045 patients from 26 Italian referral colorectal centres. The comparison between proctoscopy alone versus proctoscopy plus any other preoperative tool showed no significant differences in terms of stenoses (p = 0.217) or leakages (p = 0.103) prior to ileostomy reversal, as well as no differences in terms of misdiagnosed stenoses (p = 0.302) or leakages (p = 0.509). Interestingly, in the group that underwent proctoscopy and transanal water-soluble contrast enema the comparison between the two procedures demonstrated no significant differences in detecting stenoses (2 vs. 0, p = 0.98), while there was a significant difference in detecting leakages in favour of transanal water-soluble contrast enema via CT (3 vs. 12, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

We can confirm that proctoscopy alone should be considered sufficient prior to ileostomy reversal. However, in cases in which the results of proctoscopy are not completely clear or the surgeon remains suspicious of an anastomotic leakage, transanal water-soluble contrast enema via CT could guarantee its detection.

Impact of ileostomy on postoperative wound complications in patients after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis

To prevent anastomotic leakage and other postoperative complications after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery, a protective ileostomy is often used. However, the necessity of performing ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal cancer remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the benefit of ileostomy on wound infection after laparoscopic rectal cancer. The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PubMed were used to retrieve all related documents up to September 2023. Completion of the trial literature was submitted once the eligibility and exclusion criteria were met and the literature quality assessment was evaluated. This study compared the post-operative post-operative complications of an ileostomy with that of non-ileostomy in a laparoscope. We used Reman 5.3 to analyse meta-data. Controlled studies were evaluated with ROBINS-I. The meta-analyses included 525 studies, and 5 publications were chosen to statistically analyse the data according to the classification criteria. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of postoperative wound infections among ostomate and nonostomate (odds ratio [OR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66, 4.84; p = 0.25). In 5 trials, the incidence of anastomotic leak was increased after surgery in nonostomate patients (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.12, 0.57; p = 0.0009). Two studies reported no significant difference in the length of operation time when nonstomal compared to stomal operations in patients with rectal cancer (mean difference, 0.87; 95% CI, -2.99, 4.74; p = 0.66). No significant difference was found in the rate of wound infection and operation time after operation among the two groups, but the incidence of anastomosis leak increased after operation. Protective ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal cancer was effective in reducing the risk of anastomotic leakage in patients, and we found no additional risk of infection. We cautiously conclude that protective ileostomy is active and necessary for patients with a high risk of anastomotic leakage after surgery, which needs to be further confirmed by high-quality studies with larger samples.

Effect of transverse colostomy versus ileostomy in colorectal anastomosis on post-operative wound complications: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of colostomy or ileostomy on post-operative wound complications. The research was tested using Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases. Included were randomized, controlled clinical trials (RCTs). A sensitivity analysis and a meta-analysis were carried out. The results indicated that there were no statistically significant differences in the reduction of wound infection between LC and LI. Out of 268 related studies, 5 publications were chosen and examined for compliance. Literature quality was evaluated throughout the trial. Studies with poor literature were excluded. The data were analysed with RevMan 5.3, and a decision was taken to analyse the data with either a stochastic or a fixed-effects model. There were no significant differences in the incidence of post-operative infection in patients with LC (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.34, 1.81; p = 0.57), and the incidence of post-operative anastomotic fistulae (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.30, 3.15; p = 0.97) was not significantly different from that with LI. These meta-analyses indicate that no significant reduction in the incidence of post-operative infections or anastomotic fistulae was observed by either LC or LI.

Early diverting stoma closure is feasible and safe: results from a before-and-after study on the implementation of an early closure protocol at a tertiary referral center

BACKGROUND

Evidence on early closure (EC) of defunctioning stoma (DS) after colorectal surgery shows a favorable effect when patients are carefully selected. Therefore, a clinical pathway adapted to the implementation of an EC strategy was developed in our center. The aim of this study was to carry out a comparative analysis of time until DS closure and DS-related morbidity before and after the implementation of an EC protocol (ECP).

METHODS

This study is a before-and-after comparative analysis. Patients were divided into two cohorts according to the observational period: patients from the period before the ECP implementation (January 2015-December 2019) [Period 1] and those from the period after that (January 2020-December 2022) [Period 2]. All consecutive patients subjected to elective DS closure within both periods were eligible. Early closure was defined as the reversal within 30 days from DS creation. Patients excluded from EC or those not closed within 30 days since primary surgery were analyzed as late closure (LC). Baseline characteristics and DS-related morbidity were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients were analyzed. Median time with DS was shorter in patients after ECP implementation [42 (21-193) days versus 233 (137-382) days, p < 0.001]. This reduction in time to closure did not impact the DS closure morbidity and resulted in less DS morbidity (68.8% versus 49.2%, p = 0.017) and fewer stoma nurse visits (p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

The ECP was able to significantly reduce intervals to restoration of bowel continuity in patients with DS, which in turn resulted in a direct impact on the reduction of DS morbidity without negatively affecting DS closure morbidity.

Short-term results in a population based study indicate advantage for minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery versus open

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine if minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for rectal cancer is non-inferior to open surgery (OPEN) regarding adequacy of cancer resection in a population based setting.

METHODS

All 9,464 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer 2012-2018 who underwent curative surgery were included from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry.

PRIMARY OUTCOMES

Positive circumferential resection margin (CRM < 1 mm) and positive resection margin (R1). Non-inferiority margins used were 2.4% and 4%.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

30- and 90-day mortality, clinical anastomotic leak, re-operation < 30 days, 30- and 90-day re-admission, length of stay (LOS), distal resection margin < 1 mm and < 12 resected lymph nodes. Analyses were performed by intention-to-treat using unweighted and weighted multiple regression analyses.

RESULTS

The CRM was positive in 3.8% of the MIS group and 5.4% of the OPEN group, risk difference -1.6% (95% CI -1.623, -1.622). R1 was recorded in 2.8% of patients in the MIS group and in 4.4% of patients in the OPEN group, risk difference -1.6% (95% CI -1.649, -1.633). There were no differences between the groups in adjusted unweighted and weighted analyses. All analyses demonstrated decreased mortality and re-admissions at 30 and 90 days as well as shorter LOS following MIS.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population based setting MIS for rectal cancer was non-inferior to OPEN regarding adequacy of cancer resection with favorable short-term outcomes.