Antiepileptic drugs--best practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring: a position paper by the subcommission on therapeutic drug monitoring, ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies

Pharmacological treatment of psychiatric comorbidity in patients with refractory epilepsy

The purpose of the present study was to describe the use of psychopharmacological drugs for the treatment of a stated or presumed psychiatric comorbid condition in patients with refractory epilepsy and discuss the clinical implications of such treatment. The study was a retrospective descriptive study in patients admitted to the National Center for Epilepsy in Norway based on medication described in medical records. The mean age was 40 years (range: 9-90), and the gender ratio was 56/44% female/male. Psychotropic drugs (antidepressants and antipsychotics) were used to a lower extent than in the general population in Norway. Drugs for ADHD were predominantly used in children. The prevalence of patients treated with psychiatric comedication was 13% (143 of 1139 patients). The patients used two to eight concomitant CNS-active drugs, which calls for the close monitoring of potential pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions and should challenge clinicians to achieve a less complex pharmacotherapy. Psychiatric comorbidity is an important concern in patients with refractory epilepsy and may be undertreated.

Clobazam therapeutic drug monitoring: a comprehensive review of the literature with proposals to improve future studies

BACKGROUND

Clobazam was recently approved for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in the United States. There is no published review article focused on clobazam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in English.

METHODS

More than 200 clobazam articles identified by a PubMed search were carefully reviewed for information on clobazam pharmacokinetics. Clobazam is mainly metabolized by a cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzyme, CYP3A4, to its active metabolite, N-desmethylclobazam. Then, N-desmethylclobazam is mainly metabolized by CYP2C19 unless the individual has no CYP2C19 activity [poor metabolizer (PM)].

RESULTS

Using a mechanistic approach to reinterpret the published findings of steady-state TDM and single-dosing pharmacokinetic studies, 4 different serum clobazam concentration ratios were studied. The available limited steady-state TDM data suggest that the serum N-desmethylclobazam/clobazam ratio can be useful for clinicians, including identifying CYP2C19 PMs (ratio >25 in the absence of inhibitors). There are 3 possible concentration/dose (C/D) ratios. The clobazam C/D ratio has the potential to measure the contribution of CYP3A4 activity to the clearance of clobazam from the body. The N-desmethylclobazam C/D ratio does not seem to be a good measure of clobazam clearance and should be substituted with the total (clobazam + N-desmethylclobazam) C/D ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Future clobazam TDM studies need to use trough concentrations after steady state has been reached (>3 weeks in normal individuals and several months in CYP2C19 PMs). These future studies need to explore the potential of clobazam and total C/D ratios. Better studies on the relative potency of N-desmethylclobazam compared with the parent compound are needed to provide weighted total serum concentrations that correct for the possible lower N-desmethylclobazam pharmacodynamic activity. Standardization and more studies of C/D ratios from clobazam and other drugs can be helpful to move TDM forward.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiepileptic drugs by use of saliva

Blood (serum/plasma) antiepileptic drug (AED) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has proven to be an invaluable surrogate marker for individualizing and optimizing the drug management of patients with epilepsy. Since 1989, there has been an exponential increase in AEDs with 23 currently licensed for clinical use, and recently, there has been renewed and extensive interest in the use of saliva as an alternative matrix for AED TDM. The advantages of saliva include the fact that for many AEDs it reflects the free (pharmacologically active) concentration in serum; it is readily sampled, can be sampled repetitively, and sampling is noninvasive; does not require the expertise of a phlebotomist; and is preferred by many patients, particularly children and the elderly. For each AED, this review summarizes the key pharmacokinetic characteristics relevant to the practice of TDM, discusses the use of other biological matrices with particular emphasis on saliva and the evidence that saliva concentration reflects those in serum. Also discussed are the indications for salivary AED TDM, the key factors to consider when saliva sampling is to be undertaken, and finally, a practical protocol is described so as to enable AED TDM to be applied optimally and effectively in the clinical setting. Overall, there is compelling evidence that salivary TDM can be usefully applied so as to optimize the treatment of epilepsy with carbamazepine, clobazam, ethosuximide, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, topiramate, and zonisamide. Salivary TDM of valproic acid is probably not helpful, whereas for clonazepam, eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, pregabalin, retigabine, rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, and vigabatrin, the data are sparse or nonexistent.

Phenytoin: A Guide to Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

Therapeutic drug monitoring of phenytoin is carried out to ensure effective and safe levels. Some of the factors complicating phenytoin dosing include a narrow therapeutic window, high degree of protein binding, and nonlinear pharmacokinetics. However, serum drug levels should only be taken when there is a clear indication to guide patient management. Scenarios where monitoring levels may be clinically useful include: (1) establishing an individual therapeutic concentration, (2) aiding in diagnosis of clinical toxicity, (3) assessing patient compliance, and (4) guiding dosage adjustments in patients likely to have greater pharmacokinetic variability. This paper aims to provide an overview on of the correct timing and interpretation of phenytoin levels. It will also address phenytoin dosing, other monitoring parameters, and management of phenytoin adverse effects.

Antiepileptic drugs and breastfeeding

INTRODUCTION

This review provides a synopsis for clinicians on the use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the breastfeeding mother.

METHODS

For each AED, we collected all retrievable data from Hale's "Medications and Mother Milk" (2012), from the LactMed database (2013) of the National Library of Medicine, and from a MedLine Search of relevant studies in the past 10 years.

RESULTS

Older AEDs, such as carbamazepine, valproic acid, phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone are considered to have a good level of safety during lactation, due to the long term clinical experience and the consequent amount of available data from the scientific literature. On the contrary, fewer data are available on the use of new AEDs. Therefore, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, vigabatrin, tiagabine, pregabalin, leviracetam and topiramate are compatible with breastfeeding with a less documented safety profile. Ethosuximide, zonisamide and the continue use of clonazepam and diazepam are contraindicated during breastfeeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the current available advice on the use of AEDs during breastfeeding, given by different accredited sources, present some contradictions, most AEDs can be considered safe according to our review.

Apparent dose-dependent levetiracetam-induced de novo major depression with suicidal behavior

Levetiracetam (LEV) is a novel antiepileptic drug (AED) approved for the adjunctive treatment of generalized and partial seizures. LEV has no clinically significant drug interactions and has limited adverse effects. The psychiatric adverse effects of LEV include de novo psychosis, affective disorder, and aggression. LEV-induced suicidal behavior has been reported infrequently with a past history of affective disorders. The authors report an apparent dose/concentration-dependent LEV-induced de novo major depression with near fatal suicide attempt in a patient without prior history of affective disorder. Psychiatric evaluation with emphasis on historic/current affective disorders, impulsive-aggressive behaviors, and assessment of risk factors for suicidal behaviors is indicated in treating patients with epilepsy with LEV. Clinicians should consider therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize therapeutic LEV treatment.

Epilepsy, cognition, and neuropsychiatry (Epilepsy, Brain, and Mind, part 2)

Epilepsy is, of course, not one disease but rather a huge number of disorders that can present with seizures. In common, they all reflect brain dysfunction. Moreover, they can affect the mind and, of course, behavior. While animals too may suffer from epilepsy, as far as we know, the electrical discharges are less likely to affect the mind and behavior, which is not surprising. While the epileptic seizures themselves are episodic, the mental and behavioral changes continue, in many cases, interictally. The episodic mental and behavioral manifestations are more dramatic, while the interictal ones are easier to study with anatomical and functional studies. The following extended summaries complement those presented in Part 1.

Oh baby! A review of mood stabilizers for bipolar disorder in the child-bearing woman

Background: Bipolar disorder is a brain disorder that can cause abnormal changes in a person's mood, cognitive function, and quality of life. Patients who are diagnosed with bipolar disorder often have intense emotional states that are characterized by either manic or depressive episodes. There is a strong correlation between women of child bearing age and the initial age of onset of the disease. Mood stabilizing drugs have been the mainstay of treatment for many decades; however, there is strong data supporting the teratogenic effects of these drugs on the fetus in pregnant and lactating women.

Methods: Review articles, clinical trials, and practice guidelines were located using online databases PubMed, CINAHL, IDIS, and Medline. Search terms included at least one of the following: “bipolar disorder”, “breast-feeding”, “carbamazepine”, “epilepsy”, “lactation”, “lamotrigine”, “lithium”, “mood stabilizers”, “pregnancy”, “valproate”, and “valproic acid”. Online clinical databases Clinical Pharmacology and Lexi-Comp were also used in the study.

Results: All mood stabilizer drugs are found to cause malformations in fetal development if given during the first trimester of pregnancy, thus use should be avoided if possible. Lamotrigine was found to cause lowest risk of adverse effects in both the mother and fetus during pregnancy; however, it should be avoided in breastfeeding women as it readily passes into breast milk. Lithium use during pregnancy and lactation has been associated with severe malformations and should only be used if maternal benefit outweighs fetal risk. Valproate is considered harmful to both the mother and fetus during pregnancy, but may be a compatible option for breastfeeding. Carbamazepine is found to cause serious malformations with the developing fetus as well as metabolic effects with the mother; however, it is found to cause little effects in breastfed infants as it does not readily pass through breast milk.

Conclusion: The use of medications in pregnant and breastfeeding women suffering from bipolar disorder must be carefully considered for impacts on fetal development as well as risks to the mother. Mood stabilizers are readily marketed as first line treatment options for bipolar disorder; however, their use in pregnant and lactating women may cause limitations as preferred therapy. Studies show that though lamotrigine has not been as well studied as the other agents, it may be the best recommendation during pregnancy, for both fetal and maternal health concerns. For breastfeeding women, carbamazepine has been shown to be the better option, as it carries the lowest risk of adverse events to the infant.

Effect of 7 days of phenytoin on the pharmacokinetics of and the development of resistance to single-dose nevirapine for perinatal HIV prevention: a randomized pilot trial

OBJECTIVES

To confirm whether 7 days of phenytoin, an enzyme inducer, would decrease the elimination half-life of single-dose nevirapine and to investigate its effect on the development of nevirapine resistance in pregnant, HIV-infected women.

METHODS

In a pharmacokinetic pilot trial (NCT01187719), HIV-infected, antiretroviral (ARV)-naive pregnant women ≥18 years old from Zambia and Tanzania and with CD4 cell counts >350 cells/mm(3) were randomized 1 : 1 to a control (zidovudine pre-delivery, single-dose nevirapine/zidovudine/lamivudine at delivery and zidovudine/lamivudine for 7 days post-delivery) or an intervention (control plus 184 mg of phenytoin once daily for 7 days post-delivery) group. Primary endpoints were the pharmacokinetics of and resistance to nevirapine.

RESULTS

Thirty-five and 37 women were allocated to the control and intervention groups, with median (IQR) ages of 27 (23-31) and 27 (23-33) years, respectively. Twenty-three and 23 women had detectable nevirapine levels at delivery and subsequent samples in the control and the intervention groups, respectively. Geometric mean (GM) (95% CI) plasma levels of nevirapine at delivery were 1.02 (0.58-1.78) mg/L and 1.14 (0.70-1.86) mg/L in the control and intervention groups, respectively (P = 0.76). One week after delivery, 0/23 (0%) and 15/22 (68%) control and intervention mothers, respectively, had undetectable levels of nevirapine (<0.05 mg/L; P<0.001). One week later, the figures were 10/21 (48%) and 18/19 (95%) mothers, respectively (P = 0.002). The GM (95% CI) half-life of nevirapine was 63.2 (52.8-75.7) versus 25.5 (21.6-30.1) h in the control group versus the intervention group (P < 0.001). New nevirapine mutations were found in 0/20 (0%) intervention-group mothers versus 1/21 (5%) control-group mothers. Overall, there was no difference in adverse events reported between the control and intervention arms (P > 0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding 7 days of an enzyme inducer to single-dose nevirapine to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV significantly reduced subtherapeutic nevirapine levels by shortening the half-life of nevirapine. As prolonged subtherapeutic nevirapine dosage leads to the emergence of resistance, single-dose nevirapine could be used with phenytoin as an alternative if other ARVs were unavailable.

The management of epilepsy in pregnancy at the Whittington Hospital: a retrospective audit 2004-2006 and 2007-2010

BACKGROUND

In the last maternal death enquiries report there were 14 indirect deaths due to epilepsy.

METHODS

Retrospective case-note analysis of epileptic women seen antenatally over two separate time periods were examined. Care in the routine antenatal clinic (ANC) was compared with that in the obstetric medicine clinic (OMC).

RESULTS

1st audit, 65 epileptic women seen. In OMC 14% had documented preconception counselling, 58% were on anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). In ANC 0% had documented preconception counselling, 34% were on AEDs. 2nd audit, 88 epileptic women seen. In OMC 37.5% of women had preconception counselling, 84% were on AEDs. In ANC, 4.2% had preconception counselling, 31% were on AEDs.

CONCLUSIONS

Women seen in OMC received care more compliant with Scottish Obstetric Group and Audit Project recommendations. All women with epilepsy should be reviewed in an OMC.

Association between lamotrigine concentrations and ABCB1 polymorphisms in patients with epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is treated with a variety of anticonvulsants that are often used concomitantly. Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring is often necessary. Along with clinical and environmental factors, genetic predisposition has been recognized to be relevant for interindividual variability in drug response. Polymorphic transporter proteins such as P-glycoprotein significantly influence pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of many structurally unrelated drugs. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of polymorphisms in the P-glycoprotein-encoding gene ABCB1 (C1236T, G2677T/A, C3435T) on antiepileptic drug disposition.

METHODS

We recruited 222 patients with epilepsy who were prescribed lamotrigine in monotherapy or polytherapy. Lamotrigine plasma concentrations were analyzed and compared with ABCB1 gene variants. The ABCB1 genotyping was performed by real-time polymerase chain reaction methods. The therapeutic drug monitoring was performed by high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detector (DAD) and immunoassay.

RESULTS

A significant correlation was confirmed between lamotrigine concentration and additional drugs (P < 0.001). In the whole group, statistical analysis showed correlations between lamotrigine concentrations and ABCB1 C1236T variants: 10.1 and 6.5 μmol/L for CC versus CT + TT, respectively (P = 0.021), and for dose corrected lamotrigine 0.068 and 0.053 μmol·L·mg, for CC versus CT + TT, respectively (P = 0.017). Analysis of a specific haplotype showed that 1236C-2677G-3435C carriers had higher lamotrigine concentrations than 1236T-2677G-3435T carriers (P < 0.001), followed by 1236T-2677T-3435C carriers (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ABCB1 C1236T, G2677T/A, C3435T polymorphisms have an influence on lamotrigine serum concentrations.

Reduced valproic acid serum concentrations due to drug interactions with carbapenem antibiotics: overview of 6 cases

BACKGROUND

The plasma concentrations of valproic acid (VPA) are known to decrease during the concomitant administration of carbapenem antibiotics, such as meropenem, imipenem, and ertapenem. This study summarizes 6 cases of drug-drug interactions between VPA and carbapenem antibiotics.

METHODS

To investigate the onset and severity of the reductions in the concentration of VPA in patients with or without the coadministration of carbapenem antibiotics, the authors performed a retrospective evaluation of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) reports that described a decrease in the serum concentrations of VPA during the concomitant use of carbapenem antibiotics from January 2008 to December 2010 in the Seoul National University Hospital. The evaluated TDM reports included 6 cases. The decrement ratio of the VPA serum concentration was calculated from the TDM reports, and the change in the half-life of the VPA was also estimated.

RESULTS

Six cases presented with changes in the VPA serum concentration before and after the administration of carbapenem antibiotics. (Three cases were treated with meropenem, 2 were treated with ertapenem, and 1 was treated with imipenem.) The VPA concentrations reduced by (mean ± SD) 88.7 ± 5.3% (3 cases of meropenem), 74.0 ± 9.8% (2 cases of ertapenem), and 73.3% (1 case of imipenem), respectively, and the half-life of VPA reduced by 80.1 ± 9.0%, 64.4 ± 24.2%, and 50.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The interaction between VPA and carbapenem antibiotics caused decreases in the VPA serum concentrations; the extent of this decrease was greater in the meropenem-treated patients than in the imipenem-treated or ertapenem-treated cases. Because the therapeutic effect of VPA depends on its serum concentration, it should be recognized that there may be a loss of seizure control in patients using VPA with carbapenem antibiotics.

Factors influencing serum topiramate concentrations in routine therapeutic drug monitoring in Korean adult patients with epilepsy

PURPOSE

Topiramate (TPM) is a broad-spectrum anticonvulsant used both as an adjunctive treatment and as monotherapy. In this study, the results from a routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) service for TPM are summarized. In addition, factors influencing the variability in serum concentration of TPM and the effects of comedication on serum TPM concentration were investigated.

METHODS

Serum measurements of TPM from a routine TDM database were analyzed retrospectively. Concentration-to-dose ratio (CDR) was calculated to assess pharmacokinetic variability. We compared CDRs for patients receiving TPM monotherapy and patients receiving TPM with other antiepileptic drugs, together with the effects of each comedication on TPM concentration were studied.

RESULTS

There were 510 samples from 476 adult patients. Serum TPM was below 2.0 mg/L or above 10.0 mg/L in 28.2% and 5.9% of samples, respectively. Although serum TPM was broadly related to prescribed dose, there was wide variation. Most patients using TPM were treated in combination with other anticonvulsants (90.8%). TPM-CDR in patients receiving TPM monotherapy was not significantly different from those receiving TPM in combination with nonenzyme inducers, but TPM-CDR was lower in patients who were taking inducers (P < 0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis test, Dunnett method).

CONCLUSIONS

A large interindividual variability in TPM serum concentrations was observed in this cohort of patients. TDM of TPM is useful in selected patients such as those suspected of poor compliance/absorption and those who may experience pharmacokinetic changes because of comedication or physiological changes.

Plasma topiramate concentrations resulting from doses associated with neuroprotection against white matter injury and stroke in two strains of rat pups

BACKGROUND

Cerebral white matter (WM) injury and stroke are common neuropathological injuries in newborns with congenital heart defects (CHDs) requiring surgery. Previous investigations in Long Evans rat pups subjected to hypoxia-ischemia found that intraperitoneal (i.p.) topiramate (TPM) at 30 mg/kg, but not 50 mg/kg, conferred neuroprotection. In Sprague-Dawley pups, a dose of 30 mg/kg protected against stroke. Concentrations associated with neuroprotective doses were not measured. The aims of this investigation were to determine concentrations associated with neuroprotective doses and to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of i.p. TPM.

METHODS

Concentration-time data following administration of 30 and 50 mg/kg doses were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling.

RESULTS

Mean predicted steady-state maximum and average concentrations following 30 mg/kg TPM were 31.3 and 16.8 μg/ml in Long Evans and 39.9 and 24.4 μg/ml in Sprague-Dawley pups. Mean predicted steady-state maximum and average concentrations following 50 mg/kg TPM were 52.1 and 28.1 μg/ml in Long Evans and 66.5 and 40.6 μg/ml in Sprague-Dawley pups. The apparent clearance (CL/F) and apparent volume of distribution (V/F) were 0.0470 ml/min and 22.2 ml, respectively, for Long Evans and 0.0325 ml/min and 19.7 ml, respectively, for Sprague-Dawley pups.

CONCLUSION

TPM concentrations associated with neuroprotective doses were determined. Body size and strain were significant covariates on CL/F and V/F. Results provide targets for future neuroprotection studies.

Pharmacokinetic variability of four newer antiepileptic drugs, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate: a comparison of the impact of age and comedication

BACKGROUND

Newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are widely used in patients with epilepsy. There is still insufficient documentation regarding pharmacokinetic variability of these AEDs in different patient groups.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare age and comedication as factors contributing to pharmacokinetic variability between 4 newer AEDs (lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate) among patients with refractory epilepsy.

METHODS

Data regarding age, gender, use of AEDs, daily doses, and serum concentration measurements were retrieved from a therapeutic drug monitoring database, from patients admitted to the National Center for Epilepsy, Norway, 2007-2008.

RESULTS

In total, 1050 patients were included, 111 younger children (2-9 years), 137 older children (10-17 years), 720 adults (18-64 years), 82 elderly (65-93 years). Fifty percent of the patients were prescribed polytherapy, in 88 different combinations. The interindividual pharmacokinetic variability was extensive, as illustrated by a 10-fold variability in serum concentration compared with dose. Age affected the apparent clearance of levetiracetam to the largest extent, as shown by a 60% increase in younger children and a 40% reduction in the elderly, respectively, compared with adults. Comedication altered the clearance of lamotrigine to the greatest extent ±70% because it is affected by both enzyme inducers and inhibitors. Hepatic enzyme inducers increased the clearance of levetiracetam and topiramate by 25% and oxcarbazepine by 75%. Valproic acid reduced the clearance of topiramate by 25%.

CONCLUSION

Age and comedication are important contributors to pharmacokinetic variability. Age had the greatest impact on levetiracetam, and comedication affected the clearance of each of the 4 AEDs investigated in this study. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions must be carefully considered when multidrug therapies are prescribed. Therapeutic drug monitoring is a valuable tool for individualizing AED therapy.

The influence of bypass procedures and other anatomical changes in the gastrointestinal tract on the oral bioavailability of drugs

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract plays an important role in the absorption of orally administered drugs. However, in some cases the anatomy of the GI tract is changed due to GI surgery, which has the potential of influencing drug bioavailability. In this review, we aim to compile, review, and comment the existing but sometimes fragmented scientific data regarding the impact of GI surgery on the oral bioavailability of drugs. Relevant reports were gathered through the PubMed database from database inception through January 2012. Drugs for which at least one trial or case report suggested a change in oral bioavailability or absorption caused by GI surgery are discussed in detail. Major methodological differences, such as study design, number of subjects and choice of reference group, were observed in the reported studies. Predicting the impact of GI surgery on the oral bioavailability was therefore difficult to perform, even the most sophisticated classification systems could not be used for predicting purposes.

Clinical management of seizures in newborns : diagnosis and treatment

Neonatal seizures can be classified as tonic, clonic, myoclonic, and subtle. A clinical diagnosis is not easy as seizures are usually subtle in neonates. In the majority of newborn infants seizures are subclinical. On the other hand, not all abnormal movements identified by clinicians as clinical seizures are accompanied by electroencephalographic seizure discharges in the EEG. Precise incidence is difficult to delineate and depends on study population and criteria used for diagnosis of seizures. Controversy exists as to whether neonatal seizures themselves cause damage to the developing brain, or if the damage is primarily due to the underlying cause of the seizures. As a result of this controversy there is ongoing discussion whether all seizures (both clinical and subclinical) should be treated. In addition, when (sub)clinical seizures are treated, there is no consensus about the most appropriate treatment for neonatal seizures and how to assess the efficacy of treatment. Current therapeutic options to treat neonatal seizures (i.e. primarily first-generation antiepileptic drugs [AEDs]) are relatively ineffective. In practice, phenobarbital still remains the drug of first choice for EEG confirmed or suspected seizures. Benzodiazepines are also used in (phenobarbital) refractory cases. Several (small) studies indicate that lidocaine is an effective drug for refractory seizures as second- or third-line treatment. Although data are scarce, some AEDs with a wide acceptance in adult and pediatric neurology practice are being used to treat neonatal seizures (i.e. second-generation AEDs). These drugs are chemically different from all first-generation AEDs and they have an effect on other pathways so they provide new pharmacological targets for controlling seizures in newborns. Levetiracetam, topiramate, felbamate, bumetanide, lamotrigine and vigabatrin are examples of these second-generation AEDs. There is an urgent need for prospective, randomized, controlled trials to assess the efficacy and safety of these second-generation AEDs in neonates. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current knowledge of diagnosis, the effect on brain injury, and the treatment of neonatal seizures.

The impact of enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs on antiretroviral drug levels: a case-control study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EI-AEDs) on serum antiretroviral (ARV) levels in patients with HIV.

METHODS

Data from the U.S. Military HIV Natural History Study were screened to identify participants taking ARVs with EI-AEDs and controls taking ARVs with non enzyme-inducing AEDs (NEI-AEDs). The proportion of serum ARV levels below the recommended minimum concentrations (C(min)) was compared between these groups.

RESULTS

ARV levels were available for 10 individuals exposed to 16 intervals on combined ARVs/EI-AEDs (phenytoin and carbamazepine) and for 25 controls exposed to 30 overlap intervals on combined ARVs/NEI-AEDs. The percentage of overlap intervals with ≥1 ARV levels below C(min) was higher in the EI-AED group than in controls (37.5% vs. 23.3%; p=0.124). After excluding intervals associated with serum levels of EI-AEDs below the reference range (n=6), the proportion of intervals with ≥1 ARV level below C(min) was significantly greater among EI-AED recipients (60%) compared to controls (23.3%; p=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

ARV levels below C(min) were more common in participants receiving EI-AEDs, the difference being statistically significant for intervals associated with EI-AED levels within the reference range. These data suggest that, in agreement with current guidelines, EI-AEDs should be avoided in patients receiving ARV therapy.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in the neurocritical care unit

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Various antiepileptics, sedative and anesthetic agents are used in the neurocritical care setting and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been proposed as a means to individualize dosing to ensure efficacy, avoid toxicity, and to account for drug-drug interactions. The purpose of this review is to highlight key articles relating to TDM published in the last 5 years with a focus on drug therapy for seizures, status epilepticus, and traumatic brain injury.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current evidence supports TDM of first-generation antiepileptics, and free-level monitoring for phenytoin and valproic acid is recommended in the neurocritical care population. There are insufficient data to recommend routine TDM of second-generation antiepileptics at this time. In traumatic brain injury, routine TDM of barbiturate infusions appears to be of little value in guiding or evaluating patient response to therapy except to differentiate between drug-induced coma and brain death. Although TDM of sedative agents has been studied, the use of clinical sedation scales is preferred over TDM in evaluating a patient's level of sedation.

SUMMARY

Therapeutic drug monitoring plays an important role in the care of patients in the neurocritical care setting but is applicable only to a limited number of drugs.

Evidence for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Targeted Anticancer Therapies

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) provides valuable guidance for dose adjustment of antibiotics, immunosuppressives, antiepileptics, and other drugs, but its use for traditional anticancer therapies has been limited. Perhaps the most important obstacle is the impractical requirement of multiple blood samples to adequately define systemic exposure of drugs that have a short elimination half-life and are given by intermittent intravenous injections. However, the newer targeted anticancer therapies have different pharmacokinetic (PK) and dosing characteristics compared with traditional cytotoxic drugs, making it possible to estimate the steady-state drug exposure with a single trough-level measurement. Recent evidence indicates that certain PK parameters, including trough levels, are correlated with clinical outcomes for many of these agents, including imatinib, sunitinib, rituximab, and cetuximab. Although the current evidence is insufficient to mandate TDM in routine practice, a concerted investigation should be encouraged to determine whether the steady-state trough measurements of targeted agents will have a practical place in the clinical care of patients with cancer.

A systematic review of the pharmacokinetics of antiepileptic drugs in neonates with refractory seizures

BACKGROUND

Neonatal seizures are associated with neurological sequelae and an increased risk of epilepsy later in life. Phenobarbital and phenytoin remain the antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) most commonly used to treat neonatal seizures, despite their suboptimal effectiveness and safety. As a result, other AEDs, such as levetiracetam and topiramate, are often used in neonates with refractory seizures, despite limited data and off-label use.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review published pharmacokinetic data for second-line AEDs used in neonates with seizures and to provide dosing recommendations for these agents in the neonatal population.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed (1949-May 2012), Medline (1950-May 2012), and Embase (1980-May 2012). Each study was ranked according to the quality of evidence it provided, based on the classification system developed by the US Preventive Services Task Force. Information extracted from each study included study design, number of subjects, gestational and postnatal age, AED dosage regimen, pharmacokinetic parameters, pharmacokinetic model, AED serum concentrations, and sampling times.

RESULTS

Nineteen relevant pharmacokinetic studies involving a total of 8 different drugs were identified. No prospective, randomized, controlled studies (level I evidence) or nonrandomized controlled studies (level II-I evidence) were identified; 2 studies were prospective, nonrandomized, uncontrolled (cohort) studies (level II-2 evidence), 11 studies obtained evidence from multiple time series (level II-3 evidence), and 6 studies were case reports or descriptive studies (level III evidence).

CONCLUSIONS

There are limited pharmacokinetic data for the use of carbamazepine, levetiracetam, lidocaine, paraldehyde, topiramate, valproic acid, and vigabatrin for neonates with seizures refractory to treatment with first-line antiepileptic agents. Further research is needed to elucidate target AED serum concentrations (if any) required to optimize effectiveness and minimize dose-related adverse effects in neonates.

[Therapeutic drug monitoring of ethosuximide]

Ethosuximide is a minor antiepileptic drug, available in France since 1965, indicated in the epilepsy absence, whose interest was reassessed from recent clinical trials, showing that it was the first choice, in term of risk benefit relationship, in this indication. It is a chiral molecule that presents a high bioavailability, a lack of protein binding, hepatic metabolism and urinary excretion. Its elimination half-life is long, between 40 and 60 h in adults, 30 and 40 h in children. The therapeutic range is established at 40-100 mg/L (283-708 µmol/L), but the upper limit is probably underestimated. The clinical studies of relation exposure effects, although ancient (from the 1970s) and realized with methodologies that do not meet current criteria, show concentration-efficacy and -toxicity relationship and the risk of drug interactions is proven. It is a drug preponderantly prescribed in children, a vulnerable population with physiological change with age. To benefit at best of its effectiveness, it is necessary to have relatively high plasma concentrations. Despite these arguments and due to the lack of studies providing a sufficient level of evidence, the recommendation can only be "potentially useful", assessment probably underestimated.

The effect of poor compliance on the pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine and its epoxide metabolite using Monte Carlo simulation

AIM

To study the effects of delayed and missed doses (poor compliance) on the pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine (CBZ) and its main active metabolite carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide (CBZE) in Chinese epilepsy patients using Monte Carlo simulation.

METHODS

CBZ and CBZE time-concentration profiles in various scenarios were generated based on a population pharmacokinetic study in Chinese epilepsy patients using Monte Carlo simulation. The scenarios included patients given multiple doses of CBZ that ranged from 100 to 300 mg three times daily or from 200 to 300 mg every 12 h. The therapeutic range of CBZ and CBZE for each scenario was estimated to assess the effect of delayed or missed doses and to design corresponding rescue regimens. Moreover, the impact of body weight, absorption rate and co-therapy with other antiepileptic drugs (phenytoin, phenobarbital and valproic acid) on the dosage recommendation was investigated in the event of poor compliance.

RESULTS

The risk for a sub-therapeutic range of CBZ and CBZE was increased in a dose-dependent manner in both two and three times daily regimens when delayed or missed doses occurred. The effects of poor compliance was less prominent on the lower daily doses compared with those on the higher daily doses. The dose recommendations, in the event of poor compliance, were time related and dose dependent. Patient body weight, absorption rate and co-therapy with phenytoin, phenobarbital and valproic acid had no significant impact on the dose recommendation.

CONCLUSION

Patients with epilepsy should take the delayed doses as soon as they remember, and partial missed doses may need to be taken near or at the next scheduled time.

Antiepileptic drugs: adverse effects and drug interactions

The goal of epilepsy treatment is no seizures and no side effects. Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the mainstay of treatment. Chronic use, however, often leads to serial drug changes over time, exposing patients with epilepsy (PWE) to recurrent risks due to adverse effects (AEs) and drug interactions. Both unwanted acute and chronic AEs may occur that are usually dose-related, suggested by AED pharmacology, and addressed with appropriate use of serum drug concentrations. Idiosyncratic AEs can pose significant health issues for PWE and be lifesaving with early identification. AED pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic properties serve as the foundation for anumber of drug interactions. Hepatic enzyme systems may facilitate AED interaction with other coadministered medication through induction or inhibition of drug metabolism and result in AEs or seizures from drug interactions. A working knowledge of AED pharmacology is an essential component of good clinical practice to help clinicians predict potential AEs and DIs in the treatments of PWE.

Generalized tonic-clonic seizures and antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy--a matter of importance for the baby?

This study investigates the impact of generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) and antiepileptic drugs (AED) during pregnancy on gestational age (GA) and anthropometric data of newborns. One hundred twenty-nine singleton pregnancies resulting in live births from September 1999 to October 2010 in 106 women with epilepsy on AED therapy, recorded within the framework of the EURAP (International Registry of Antiepileptic Drugs and Pregnancy) program at the Department of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria, were studied. Occurrence of ≥ 1 GTCS during pregnancy was associated with a shorter GA [median (range) 37.5 [35.1-41.6] vs. 39.7 [29.1-46.3] weeks; p ≤ 0.001], an overall five times higher preterm risk (p = 0.042) and a reduced birth weight in boys (2,900 [2,050-3,870] vs. 3,205 [1,575-4,355] g; p = 0.040). In primipara, when compared to multipara, GTCS ≥ 1 significantly reduced the GA (37.9 [35.1-41.6] vs. 39.7 [29.4-44.9] weeks; p = 0.020) and raised the incidence of low birth weight (LBW) (p = 0.022) in neonates. Antiepileptic drug polytherapy significantly increased the risk for small-for-gestational-age regarding weight (SGA(W); p = 0.035) and regarding weight and/or length (SGA(W/L); p = 0.046) when compared to monotherapy. GTCS during pregnancy was associated with diverse negative effects comprising shorter GA, an increased incidence of prematurity and LBW in primiparous women. Furthermore, AED polytherapy was correlated with an enhanced risk for SGA delivery. Re-evaluating the need for drug therapy (in particular polytherapy), maintaining seizure control for a given period before pregnancy and counseling about the importance of preventing GTCS might improve pregnancy outcome in women with epilepsy.

Utilization patterns of antiepileptic drugs among adult epileptic patients at a tertiary hospital in Oman

Objectives

To describe utilization patterns of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) among adult epileptic patients at a tertiary hospital in Oman.

Methods

Data were collected retrospectively from January 2006 to December 2009. The study included all adult (&gt;18 years) epileptic patients on AEDs and followed up at a neurology clinic at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital in Oman. All reported therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) requests for serum AED concentrations were also collected. Institutional ethical approval was sought and obtained.

Key findings

The study included a total of 372 patients with a mean age of 34 ± 15 years. Monotherapy AEDs accounted for 53% of the prescriptions, whereas polytherapy with two or three AED combinations accounted for 27% and 20% respectively. The most frequently prescribed AED was sodium valproate (27%) followed by carbamazepine (23%). The commonly prescribed AED combinations were sodium valproate with clonazepam (12%) followed by sodium valproate with lamotrigine (12%). Evaluation of 574 TDM requests for three AEDs showed that 57% of carbamazepine, 78% of phenytoin and 54% of valproic acid requests were either above or below the recommended therapeutic threshold. Most of these requests were ordered from the hospital's emergency department for suspected insufficient serum concentrations.

Conclusions

Antiepileptic drug monotherapy is still the most frequently employed therapeutic strategy in adult patients with epilepsy in keeping with the standard therapeutic guidelines. Sodium valproate is commonly used for different types of seizures reflecting its wide spectrum of anticonvulsant potential. Newer AED utilizations are becoming increasingly popular in our subjects particularly as add-on with other standard AEDs.

Adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs

More than 150 years after bromide was introduced as the first antiepileptic drug, adverse effects remain a leading cause of treatment failure and a major determinant of impaired health-related quality of life in people with epilepsy. Adverse effects can develop acutely or many years after starting treatment and can affect any organ or structure. In the past two decades, many efforts have been made to reduce the burden of antiepileptic drug toxicity. Several methods to screen and quantify adverse effects have been developed. Patient profiles associated with increased risk of specific adverse effects have been uncovered through advances in the areas of epidemiology and pharmacogenomics. Several new-generation antiepileptic drugs with improved tolerability profiles and reduced potential for drug interaction have been added to the therapeutic armamentarium. Overall, these advances have expanded the opportunities to tailor treatment with antiepileptic drugs, to enhance effectiveness and minimise the risk of toxic effects.

Practices Associated with Serum Antiepileptic Drug Level Monitoring at a Pediatric Neurology Clinic

Objectives: To assess the practices associated with the application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the management of children with structural–metabolic epilepsy. Methods: It was a retrospective chart review and included children aged ≥2 years old with structural–metabolic epilepsy, treated with AEDs, and received TDM. The data were extracted from the medical records. Results: Thirty-two patients were identified with 50 TDM assays. In two thirds of the assays, “check level” and “recheck level” were the reasons behind the requesting of serum level monitoring of AEDs. Knowledge of serum AED levels led to alterations in the management in 60% of the assays. Thirty-two (76%) pediatrician’s actions were consistent with the recommendation of TDM pharmacist. Forty-nine (98%) levels were appropriately indicated. In relation to the appropriateness of sampling time, 9 (18%) levels were not assessed due to missing data. Twenty-seven (54%) levels were appropriately sampled. Conclusions: More studies should be designed to improve the component of the current TDM request form, especially in the reason section. By the same token, the number of pointless assays and the costs to the health care system can be reduced both by enhancing and improving the educational standards of the requesting neurologists

Antiepileptic drug monotherapy versus polytherapy: pursuing seizure freedom and tolerability in adults

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite the availability of many new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), only around 50% of people with epilepsy will become seizure free on their first drug. This article explores treatment options and issues influencing whether AEDs should be substituted or combined in the remainder of the patient population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Prior to the introduction of novel AEDs, it was generally opined that combining traditional agents did not necessarily lead to an improvement in seizure control and might increase the propensity for side effects. Newer AEDs, many with different mechanisms of action, have increased the potential for polytherapy regimens, although robust data to support or refute this therapeutic strategy are sparse. It seems sensible to substitute rather than combine when the first AED produces an idiosyncratic reaction, is poorly tolerated at a low/moderate dose or shows no efficacy. Polytherapy may be preferred if the patient tolerates their first or second AED well, but with a suboptimal response, particularly when there is an identifiable anatomical substrate for the seizures. AED selection requires consideration of many factors some of which are discussed in this study.

SUMMARY

There are no definitive answers on whether to combine or substitute AEDs. Different strategies are required for different scenarios in different patients.

Development and validation of a bioanalytical LC-UV method with solid-phase extraction for determination of valproic acid in saliva

A bioanalytical HPLC method with UV detection for the determination of the antiepileptic drug valproic acid in human saliva has been developed and validated. Saliva represents an alternative matrix for therapeutic monitoring of antiepileptic drugs due to the increasing interest in free drug concentration. The proposed method involved solid-phase extraction for sample preparation and yielded very good mean recoveries of 99.4 % and 97.9 % for valproic acid and IS, respectively. The calibration function for valproic acid was linear over the concentration range of 1.0-50.0 μg mL⁻¹ (R² = 0.9989). Within-run and between-run precision and accuracy were studied at four concentrations and RSDs were less than 7.3 and 2.2 %, while accuracy values were higher than 96.8 and 97.5 %, respectively. The described method provides sensitivity, linearity, precision, accuracy and is suitable for analyses of valproic acid in saliva samples.

Patterns of treatment response in newly diagnosed epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To delineate the temporal patterns of outcome and to determine the probability of seizure freedom with successive antiepileptic drug regimens in newly diagnosed epilepsy.

METHODS

Patients in whom epilepsy was diagnosed and the first antiepileptic drug prescribed between July 1, 1982, and April 1, 2006, were followed up until March 31, 2008. Outcomes were categorized into 4 patterns: (A) early and sustained seizure freedom; (B) delayed but sustained seizure freedom; (C) fluctuation between periods of seizure freedom and relapse; and (D) seizure freedom never attained. Probability of seizure freedom with successive drug regimens was compared. Seizure freedom was defined as no seizures for ≥1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 1,098 patients were included (median age 32 years, range 9-93). At the last clinic visit, 749 (68%) patients were seizure-free, 678 (62%) on monotherapy. Outcome pattern A was observed in 408 (37%), pattern B in 246 (22%), pattern C in 172 (16%), and pattern D in 272 (25%) patients. There was a higher probability of seizure freedom in patients receiving 1 compared to 2 drug regimens, and 2 compared to 3 regimens (p < 0.001). The difference was greater among patients with symptomatic or cryptogenic than with idiopathic epilepsy. Less than 2% of patients became seizure-free on subsequent regimens but a few did so on their sixth or seventh regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy had a constant course which could usually be predicted early. The chance of seizure freedom declined with successive drug regimens, most markedly from the first to the third and among patients with localization-related epilepsies.