Effect of d-sotalol on mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after recent and remote myocardial infarction. The SWORD Investigators. Survival With Oral d-Sotalol

Large clinical trials in the management of ventricular arrhythmias. Applying group results to individual cases

Applying the results of clinical trials to everyday practice in an appropriate manner can be difficult. Earlier clinical trials focused on the secondary prevention of ventricular arrhythmias. Studying patients at high risk of recurrent ventricular arrhythmias is important, but the overall impact on arrhythmic death is low. Recent arrhythmia trials have studied specific patient populations for the primary prevention of ventricular arrhythmias. New trials will expand the investigation to other populations. This article summarizes the results of large clinical trials in the management of ventricular arrhythmias and attempts to provide guidelines for applying their results to everyday clinical practice.

Appropriate outcome measures in trials evaluating treatment of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a widespread disease that has only recently received the focused attention of arrhythmia specialists despite being the most frequently occurring significant cardiac arrhythmia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The wide variety of trial designs used to evaluate AF treatment is a reflection of the diverse outcomes associated with this condition. The best trials assess the impact of treatment on a clearly measured outcome that is of clinical relevance to patients. This review discusses the different designs of AF treatment trials and analyzes the utility of the various outcomes that can be assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

A sensible goal of AF treatment is to reduce the frequency of recurrences and to prolong the time between them. The most appropriate trials focus on AF recurrences that are symptomatic and therefore relevant to the patient. We still do not know if there is value in AF prevention, beyond preventing symptoms. However, ongoing and future studies will show whether AF suppression reduces the longer-term risks of stroke or death and improves patient quality of life. Cost of care will increasingly be studied in future trials of AF management.

ICD therapy in the new millennium

Remarkable progress has been made in the 15 years since ICD therapy was approved for human use. The early "shock boxes" had almost no diagnostic capabilities and required thoracotomy for epicardial patch implantation with typical duration of hospitalization of about a week. Pulse-generator longevity was less than 2 years. Modern devices provide detailed information about the morphology and rate of electrocardiographic signals before, during, and after arrhythmia therapy. The down-sizing of pulse generators and improvements in lead design and shock waveforms allow the simplicity of defibrillator implantation to approach that of pacemakers, with defibrillation thresholds comparable with those initially observed with epicardial patches. Despite the marked reduction in size and increase in diagnostic capabilities, device longevity is now longer than 6 years. Routine outpatient ICD implantation is presently feasible and will increase in frequency if ongoing primary prevention trials prove beneficial. Further advances in lead technology and arrhythmia discrimination should increase the efficacy and reliability of therapy. Finally, devices have the capabilities to treat multiple problems in addition to life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias including atrial arrhythmias and congestive heart failure.

Proper use of antiarrhythmic therapy for reduction of mortality after myocardial infarction

In this review, we summarise Vaughan Williams' classification of antiarrhythmic agents and the trials that have explored their efficacy in reducing mortality after myocardial infarction (MI). After analysing the data, it is clear that there is no role for class I antiarrhythmic agents as prophylaxis after MI since their use has been associated with increased mortality. Class II agents, i.e. beta-blockers, have demonstrated a reduction in mortality in combined and individual trials which extended for up to 6 years after the initial event. The class III drug, d,l-sotalol has been shown to have possible benefit, whereas its isomer without any beta-blocking properties, dexsotalol, has been shown to increase the incidence of arrhythmias. Amiodarone appears to reduce the incidence of deaths due to arrhythmia and sudden deaths without changing overall mortality. As a group, the calcium antagonists, class IV agents, have not been shown to reduce mortality and, in the case of nifedipine, may even increase it. Verapamil has been shown to be beneficial in one large study and may have a role in those patients in whom the use of beta-blockers is contraindicated. At this time, we recommend early implementation of beta-blockers for all patients without contraindications after MI. Further studies evaluating implantable defibrillators as primary and secondary prevention have provided significant risk reductions in certain high risk patient subsets. Future efforts will need to focus on more accurate risk stratification of post-MI patients and the role of both defibrillators and, possibly, amiodarone in improving survival.

[Prevention of sudden death in patients awaiting heart transplantation]

Sudden death, unexpectedly alters outcome in many patients awaiting heart transplantation. The prevention of sudden death in these patients has been the focus of intensive research to achieve a larger number of patients who finally receive transplants. Recent advances in the medical treatment of heart failure, have reduced mortality and in particular, that caused by sudden death. Nonetheless sudden death remains a frequent cause of mortality in patients awaiting cardiac transplantation. The recognition of patients at very high risk for sudden death is relatively easy, but most patients who suffer sudden death while awaiting cardiac transplantation, are not among those initially included in the overall high risk category. The betablockers, when patients are able to use them, can reduce sudden and total mortality. Class I antiarrhythmic drugs should not be used in patients with cardiac failure. Amiodarone does not increase mortality and may have a beneficial effect in some patients, but its efficacy is lower than that of the implantable defibrillator and its widespread use is not justified. The implantable defibrilator is the reference treatment to reduce sudden death in selected patients, awaiting transplantation.

Nerve sprouting and sudden cardiac death

The factors that contribute to the occurrence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with chronic myocardial infarction (MI) are not entirely clear. The present study tests the hypothesis that augmented sympathetic nerve regeneration (nerve sprouting) increases the probability of ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), and SCD in chronic MI. In dogs with MI and complete atrioventricular (AV) block, we induced cardiac sympathetic nerve sprouting by infusing nerve growth factor (NGF) to the left stellate ganglion (experimental group, n=9). Another 6 dogs with MI and complete AV block but without NGF infusion served as controls (n=6). Immunocytochemical staining revealed a greater magnitude of sympathetic nerve sprouting in the experimental group than in the control group. After MI, all dogs showed spontaneous VT that persisted for 5.8+/-2.0 days (phase 1 VT). Spontaneous VT reappeared 13.1+/-6.0 days after surgery (phase 2 VT). The frequency of phase 2 VT was 10-fold higher in the experimental group (2.0+/-2.0/d) than in the control group (0.2+/-0.2/d, P<0.05). Four dogs in the experimental group but none in the control group died suddenly of spontaneous VF. We conclude that MI results in sympathetic nerve sprouting. NGF infusion to the left stellate ganglion in dogs with chronic MI and AV block augments sympathetic nerve sprouting and creates a high-yield model of spontaneous VT, VF, and SCD. The magnitude of sympathetic nerve sprouting may be an important determinant of SCD in chronic MI.

Ischemia-induced action potential shortening is blunted by d-sotalol in a pig model of reversible myocardial ischemia

The purpose of this study was to investigate, in an anesthetized pig model of low-flow myocardial ischemia, the electrophysiologic effects of the class III drug d-sotalol during myocardial ischemia. Serial monophasic action potential (MAPD90) recordings and refractory period determinations from the anterior and posterior left ventricular wall were taken in 25 pigs during baseline, after low-flow posterior wall ischemia, after d-sotalol infusion under nonischemic conditions, and after repeated posterior wall ischemia while continuing the drug. Measurements were done at 60 and 150 beats/min after radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular conduction. At baseline, MAPD90 and refractory periods were comparable in the anterior and posterior wall (323 +/- 15 vs. 318 +/- 10 ms, and 267 +/- 10 vs. 262 +/- 11 ms at 60 beats/min, respectively). In the absence of d-sotalol, low-flow regional ischemia was associated with a significant shortening of MAPD90 in the posterior versus the anterior wall (267 +/- 20 vs. 317 +/- 20 ms at 60 beats/min; p = 0.006). Similarly, ischemia-induced shortening of the refractory periods in the posterior wall was apparent (230 +/- 16 ms in the posterior wall vs. 274 +/- 14 ms in the anterior wall at 60 beats/min). In contrast, ischemia was no longer associated with shortening of MAPD90 (360 +/- 17 ms posterior wall and 360 +/- 20 ms anterior wall at 60 beats/min) and refractory periods (304 +/- 19 ms posterior wall vs. 316 +/- 15 ms anterior wall at 60 beats/min) during combined posterior wall ischemia and d-sotalol infusion. Similar findings were obtained during pacing at 150 beats/min. d-Sotalol attenuates ischemia-induced action potential shortening. This property should decrease dispersion of cardiac repolarization and be antiarrhythmic. On the other hand, longer APD under ischemic conditions may favor calcium overload, which may trigger new arrhythmias.

Canadian implantable defibrillator study (CIDS) : a randomized trial of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator against amiodarone

BACKGROUND

Patients surviving ventricular fibrillation (VF) or sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) are at a high risk of death due to a recurrence of arrhythmia. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) terminates VT or VF, but it is not known whether this device prolongs life in these patients compared with medical therapy with amiodarone.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 659 patients with resuscitated VF or VT or with unmonitored syncope were randomly assigned to treatment with the ICD or with amiodarone. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome was arrhythmic death. A total of 328 patients were randomized to receive an ICD. A thoracotomy was done in 33, no ICD was implanted in 18, and the rest had a nonthoracotomy ICD. All 331 patients randomized to amiodarone received it initially. At 5 years, 85.4% of patients assigned to amiodarone were still receiving it at a mean dose of 255 mg/day, 28.1% of ICD patients were also receiving amiodarone, and 21.4% of amiodarone patients had received an ICD. A nonsignificant reduction in the risk of death was observed with the ICD, from 10.2% per year to 8.3% per year (19.7% relative risk reduction; 95% confidence interval, -7.7% to 40%; P=0.142). A nonsignificant reduction in the risk of arrhythmic death was observed, from 4.5% per year to 3.0% per year (32.8% relative risk reduction; 95% confidence interval, -7.2% to 57.8%; P=0.094).

CONCLUSIONS

A 20% relative risk reduction occurred in all-cause mortality and a 33% reduction occurred in arrhythmic mortality with ICD therapy compared with amiodarone; this reduction did not reach statistical significance.

Effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on QT interval dispersion--relationship to antiarrhythmic action and proarrhythmia

Class IA, IC, and III antiarrhythmic drugs prolong ventricular repolarization (VR) which is manifest as QT interval prolongation on the surface electrocardiogram. These drugs may prolong VR in a spatially heterogeneous manner which results in increased dispersion of VR. This may be manifest as increased QT interval dispersion. Antiarrhythmic drug-induced decreases in QT interval dispersion are associated with antiarrhythmic efficacy in patients with the long QT syndrome and in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia. Antiarrhythmic drug-induced increases in QT interval dispersion are associated with ventricular proarrhythmia secondary to torsades de points ventricular tachycardia. A number of factors may modulate the effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on dispersion of VR, including the disease state, transient ischemia, electrolyte abnormalities, changes in autonomic tone, and hemodynamic stress.

Modern adjunctive pharmacotherapy of myocardial infarction

During acute myocardial infarction (MI), aspirin, beta-adrenergic antagonists and oral angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors should be used as an adjunct to reperfusion therapy. Medications upon discharge from the hospital should include aspirin and a beta-blocker. An ACE inhibitor should also be prescribed unless the ejection fraction is > 45%. Particular indications for an ACE inhibitor are an anterior MI, congestive heart failure, ejection fraction < 45% and mitral regurgitation. beta-blockers, when given to patients treated with ACE inhibitors, appear to produce an additional benefit compared with an ACE inhibitor alone. Based on the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S), Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) and Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) trials, a statin should also be given to subjects with low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels above 125 mg/dl, independent of total cholesterol levels. Therapy should be administered in an attempt to reduce the LDL-cholesterol level to 90-100 mg/dl (2.3-2.6 mM/l). In patients with normal or low levels on initial evaluation, screening for lipid abnormalities should be deferred for 2 months since acute phase responses and passive hepatic congestion can cause spuriously normal levels. Calcium channel blockers, nitrates, lidocaine, anti-arrhythmic drugs and i.v. magnesium should not be administered routinely after acute MI and their use should be restricted to selected settings.

[Predictors of sudden death in coronary artery disease]

Although advances in the management of acute myocardial infarction have resulted in a decline in long-term risk of sudden death, it continues to be high in certain subsets of patients. Thus, it is important to identify and treat these patients. Left ventricular ejection fraction less than 0.40, frequent premature ventricular ectopy on Holter monitoring, late potentials on signal-averaged electrocardiogram, impaired heart rate variability, abnormal baroreflex sensitivity and inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia during electrophysiological study are predictors of sudden death and arrhythmic events. Although the negative predictive value of each factor is high, the positive predictive accuracy is low. Several tests can be combined to obtain higher positive predictive values. In fact, in some studies combined noninvasive tests have been used to select patients for ventricular stimulation study. Some preventive treatment can be applied in these patients. Available data do not justify prophylactic therapy with amiodarone in high-risk survivors of acute myocardial infarction. Sudden death and total mortality have been significantly reduced in postinfarction patients by long-term beta blockade. Hence, beta blockers should be given to all patients with acute myocardial infarction who do not have contraindications to their use. The MADIT study has shown the beneficial effect of implantable cardioverter defibrillator in reducing mortality in patients with prior myocardial infarction, an ejection fraction less than 0.36, asymptomatic nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, and inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia, unsuppressable by procainamide. Besides, several studies are under way to evaluate the prophylactic use of implantable defibrillator for improving survival in high-risk patients.

Defibrillators in nonischemic cardiomyopathy treatment evaluation

The Defibrillators in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation (DEFINITE) is a multicenter randomized trial. Patients will have nonischemic cardiomyopathy (LVEF < or = 35%), a history of symptomatic heart failure and spontaneous arrhythmia (> 10 PVCs/hour or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia defined as 3-15 beats at a rate of > 120 beats/min) on Holter monitor or telemetry within the past 6 months. Patients will be randomized to an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) versus no ICD. All patients will receive standard oral medical therapy for heart failure including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers (if tolerated). Patients will be followed for 2-3 years. The primary endpoint will be total mortality. Quality-of-life and pharmacoeconomics analyses will also be performed. A registry will track patients who meet basic inclusion criteria but are not randomized. We estimate an annual total mortality of 15% at 2 years in the treatment arm that does not receive an ICD. The ICD is expected to reduce mortality by 50%. Approximately 204 patients will be required in each treatment group. Twenty-five centers will be included in a trial designed to last an estimated 4 years.

Analysis of the electrophysiological effects of ambasilide, a new antiarrhythmic agent, in canine isolated ventricular muscle and purkinje fibers

The aim of the study was to determine the in vitro rate-dependent cellular electrophysiological effects of ambasilide (10 and 20 microM/l), a new investigational antiarrhythmic agent, in canine isolated ventricular muscle and Purkinje fibers by applying the standard microelectrode technique. At the cycle length (CL) of 1000 ms, ambasilide significantly prolonged the action potential duration measured at 90% repolarization (APD(90)) in both ventricular muscle and Purkinje fibers. Ambasilide (10 microM/l) produced a more marked prolongation of APD(90) at lower stimulation frequencies in Purkinje fibers (at CL of 2000 ms = 56.0 +/- 16.1%, n = 6, versus CL of 400 ms = 15.1 +/- 3.7%, n = 6; p < 0.05), but, in 20 microM/l, this effect was considerably diminished (15.2 +/- 3.6%, n = 6, versus 7.3 +/- 5.1%, n = 6, p < 0.05). In ventricular muscle, however, both concentrations of the drug induced an almost frequency-independent lengthening of APD(90) in response to a slowing of the stimulation rate (in 20 microM/l at CL of 5000 ms = 19.0 +/- 1.5%, n = 9, versus CL of 400 ms = 16.9 +/- 1.4%, n = 9). Ambasilide induced a marked rate-dependent depression of the maximal rate of rise of the action potential upstroke (V(max)) (in 20 microM/l at CL of 300 ms = -45.1 +/- 3.9%, n = 6, versus CL of 5000 ms = -8.5 +/- 3.9%, n = 6, p < 0. 05, in ventricular muscle) and the corresponding recovery of V(max) time constant was tau = 1082.5 +/- 205.1 ms (n = 6). These data suggest that ambasilide, in addition to its Class III antiarrhythmic action, which is presumably due to its inhibitory effect on the delayed rectifier potassium current, possesses I/B type antiarrhythmic properties as a result of the inhibition of the fast sodium channels at high frequency rate with relatively fast kinetics. This latter effect may play an important role in its known less-pronounced proarrhythmic ("torsadogenic") potential.

Optimising management of patients with advanced heart failure: the importance of preventing progression

Heart failure is a highly complex, progressive and deadly disease. When incorrectly treated, it results in irreversible structural damage to the myocardium and resists any conventional treatment. This stage has been arbitrarily termed refractory heart failure. However, with timely and sufficiently applied neurohumoral antagonists, progression can be prevented, or at least delayed. In contrast, as soon as heart failure has become moderate or severe due to advanced left ventricular dysfunction, polypharmacy is the rule. Physicians should make every effort to maintain or reconsider optimal neurohumoral antagonist therapy in such patients, even if symptomatic improvement from these agents may be slow. Proper use of diuretics is essential not only for symptom relief but also to achieve full benefit from angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers. Digitalis may be particularly indicated in severe heart failure, irrespective of rhythm. Adjunctive regimens can be helpful in specific patients, but evidence of their salutary effects to prolong life is lacking. In the decompensated state, tailoring intravenous therapy to haemodynamic goals followed by (re-)institution of optimal oral therapy is an option. Only if these strategies fail is heart transplantation justified. While waiting for a donor, patients have been bridged with various intravenous agents, most often inotropes, but symptom relief is associated with risk of increased mortality due to these drugs. New hope emerges from drugs interfering with endothelin and the cytokines, and from research into increasing contractility with calcium sensitising agents. Even though these developments follow established routes, they may enable a more effective approach to prevent worsening heart failure in every single patient.

Review of common adverse effects of selected antiarrhythmic drugs

The management of cardiac arrhythmias has changed dramatically over the past several years. New drugs and devices are now available to treat various arrhythmias. Many new agents have been developed that rely on different electrophysiologic mechanisms to elicit their effect on the heart rhythm. Though often effective, these drugs also pose a risk because all of them have a variety of potential adverse effects associated with their use. Many of these adverse reactions are common to all antiarrhythmic drugs, whereas others are unique to particular agents. This review discusses the notable adverse effects of selected antiarrhythmic drugs.

Negative chronotropic and inotropic effects of class I antiarrhythmic drugs assessed in isolated canine blood-perfused sinoatrial node and papillary muscle preparations

The present study was designed to assess the negative chronotropic and inotropic effects of 10 class I antiarrhythmic drugs, using isolated canine blood-perfused sinoatrial node and papillary muscle preparations. Each drug showed negative chronotropic and inotropic effects in a dose-related manner. The potency of the suppressive effect on the sinoatrial automaticity was in the order of aprindine, quinidine, flecainide, lidocaine, mexiletine, cibenzoline, disopyramide, procainamide, tocainide, and phenytoin, while the effect on the ventricular contraction was in the order of aprindine, flecainide, cibenzoline, lidocaine, mexiletine, disopyramide, tocainide, phenytoin, quinidine, and procainamide. The differences in the suppressive effects could not necessarily be explained by their subclassification, based either on action potential duration or kinetic properties of dissociation or association with sodium channels. On the other hand, we found a good correlation between the negative inotropic effects of class I drugs in this study and the canine antiarrhythmic plasma concentrations for the digitalis- and coronary ligation-induced ventricular arrhythmia models in our previous studies. However, the negative chronotropic effects of the drugs showed a poor correlation with the antiarrhythmic plasma drug concentrations. The data shown in this paper may provide a convenient guideline for predicting acute cardiosuppressive effects of antiarrhythmic drugs, especially in patients with reduced cardiac function.

Comparison of QT dispersion during atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm in the same patients, at normal and prolonged ventricular repolarization

AIMS

Drug-induced increase in QT dispersion has been associated with increased risk of ventricular proarrhythmia. The aim of the present study was to compare QT dispersion during atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm in the same patients at normal and prolonged ventricular repolarization.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty-one patients who had had chronic atrial fibrillation for 8 +/- 14 months received a 6 h infusion of the Ikr-blocker almokalant, the first 90 min of which are used for this analysis. The following day, after conversion to sinus rhythm, by almokalant (n = 19) or direct current cardioversion (n=42), an identical 90 min infusion was administered. Prior to infusion, there was no difference in precordial QT dispersion between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm (29 +/- 12 vs 36 +/- 17 ms, P=ns). During infusion, at prolonged repolarization, the increase in QT dispersion was greater during sinus rhythm than during atrial fibrillation (58 +/- 49 vs 30 +/- 15 ms, P=0.0011, after 30 min infusion). No correlation was found between QT dispersion and the QT or RR interval.

CONCLUSION

QT dispersion during atrial fibrillation does not differ from QT dispersion during sinus rhythm during normal repolarization. while measurement of QT dispersion during prolonged repolarization, induced by an Ikr-blocker, yielded larger values during sinus rhythm than during atrial fibrillation.

Arrhythmias in heart failure: current concepts of mechanisms and therapy

About one half of deaths in patients with heart failure are sudden, mostly due to ventricular tachycardia (VT) degenerating to ventricular fibrillation or immediate ventricular fibrillation. In severe heart failure, sudden cardiac death also may occur due to bradyarrhythmias. Other dysrhythmias complicating heart failure include atrial and ventricular extrasystoles, atrial fibrillation (AF), and sustained and nonsustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The exact mechanism of the increased vulnerability to arrhythmias is not known. Depending on the etiology of heart failure, different preconditions, including ischemia or structural alterations such as fibrosis or myocardial scarring, may be prominent. Reentrant mechanisms around scar tissue, afterdepolarizations, and triggered activity due to changes in calcium metabolism significantly contribute to arrhythmogenesis. Furthermore, alterations in potassium currents leading to action potential prolongation and an increase in dispersion of repolarization play a significant role. Treatment of arrhythmias is necessary either because patients are symptomatic or to reduce the risk for sudden cardiac death. The individual history, left ventricular function, electrophysiologic testing, and the signal-averaged ECG give useful information for identifying patients at risk for sudden cardiac death. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has evolved as a promising therapy for life-threatening arrhythmias. A potential role may exist for antiarrhythmic drugs, mainly amiodarone. There is growing evidence that patients with sustained VT or a history of resuscitation have the best outcome with ICD therapy regardless of the degree of heart failure. Many of these patients require additional antiarrhythmic therapy because of AF or nonsustained VTs that may activate the device. Catheter ablation or map-guided endocardial resection are additional options in selected patients but seldom represent the only therapeutic strategy.

Hypomagnesemia in heart failure with ventricular arrhythmias. Beneficial effects of magnesium supplementation

OBJECTIVE

To assess the role of electrolyte imbalance in cardiac arrhythmias associated with congestive heart failure.

DESIGN

Serum magnesium and potassium levels, urine magnesium excretion and the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias were assessed throughout the study. The patients who displayed complex arrhythmias after the first week of hospital medication were randomized 2:1 to double-blind magnesium supplementation or placebo.

SETTING

The study was carried out in one municipal hospital, providing primary care.

SUBJECTS

A total of 588 consecutive patients were screened for eligibility (clinical heart failure >/=6 months; NYHA class II-IV; left ventricular ejection fraction </=40%; sinus rhythm; serum creatinine </=2 mg dL-1). A total of 78 patients entered and 68 patients completed the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Intravenous administration of magnesium (magnesium sulphate 8 g in 250 mL of 5% glucose) or placebo (250 mL of 5% glucose) over 12 h.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

(i) Incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with hypomagnesemia; (ii) effects of magnesium supplementation on ventricular arrhythmias.

RESULTS

On admission, hypomagnesemia was found in 38% and excessive magnesium loss in 72% of patients. Serum magnesium levels were lower and urine magnesium excretion was greater in patients with complex ventricular arrhythmias, both on admission and after treatment for heart failure. Intravenous administration of magnesium caused a significant decrease in the number of ventricular ectopic beats (P < 0.0001), couplets (P < 0.003) and episodes of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypomagnesemia, probably related to increased urine magnesium excretion, is an essential feature of heart failure associated with complex ventricular arrhythmias. These arrhythmias can be alleviated/abolished by magnesium supplementation.

The importance of considering trial design when interpreting clinical trial results

BACKGROUND

In recent decades, clinical trials have played an increasingly important role in determining how we practice. Trial results proving that a clinical finding poses risk have led to interventions that try to reduce risk. Clinical trials proving that a particular therapy provides better outcome than another therapy have changed the therapies we now use. Unfortunately, the results of clinical trials are too often affected by biases or design issues that may overtly or covertly alter the results or the way they should really be used. In addition, these biases and design and analysis issues are rarely evident in the abstract sections or key figures and tables in the publications reporting the trials, which may be all the busy physician either reads or remembers.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This manuscript discusses the issues involved in optimally understanding clinical trial design and interpretation so that practitioners can better understand how to intelligently read and apply trial results to clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical trial results can not be properly applied without consideration of trial design features and intertrial comparisons.

New advances in class III antiarrhythmic drug therapy

In the past 2 years, significant advances have been made in class III antiarrhythmic drug therapy. In patients with ventricular arrhythmias and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), antiarrhythmic agents are increasingly being used as adjunct therapy to decrease the frequency of ICD discharges. Sotalol was recently shown to be effective in reducing tachyarrhythmias in patients with ICDs. Intravenous amiodarone is being used for the acute treatment of unstable ventricular arrhythmia and is being investigated for the treatment of acute out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Class III agents are increasingly being used for prophylaxis in patients who have atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, and data point to an important role for these agents in reducing supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after cardiac surgery. Future studies will need to directly compare these agents with pure anti-adrenergic maneuvers in postoperative patients. In addition to terminating atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, ibutilide significantly reduces human atrial defibrillation thresholds and increases the percentage of patients who can be cardioverted from atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. The US Food and Drug Administration is expected to approve dofetilide for clinical use soon, and it is currently reviewing azimilide (which seems to be devoid of frequency-dependent effects on repolarization) for prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Dronedarone, tedisamal, and trecetilide are now under active study intended to determine their usefulness in patients with cardiac arrhythmias. Experimental studies are ongoing to identify pharmacologic agents that will selectively prolong repolarization in the atria without exerting electrophysiologic effects in the ventricles.

Amiodarone: clinical trials

Amiodarone is an antiarrhythmic agent commonly used in the treatment of supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. This article reviews the results and clinical implications of primary and secondary prevention trials in which amiodarone was used in one of the treatment arms. Key post-myocardial infarction primary prevention trials include the European Myocardial Infarct Amiodarone Trial (EMIAT) and the Canadian Amiodarone Myocardial Infarction Trial (CAMIAT), both of which demonstrated that amiodarone reduced arrhythmic but not overall mortality. In congestive heart failure patients, amiodarone was studied as a primary prevention strategy in two pivotal trials: Grupo de Estudio de la Sobrevida en la Insuficiencia Cardiac en Argentina (GESICA) and Amiodarone in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure and Asymptomatic Ventricular Arrhythmia (CHF-STAT). Amiodarone was associated with a neutral overall survival and a trend toward improved survival in nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients in CHF/STAT and improved survival in GESICA. In post-myocardial infarction patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and a depressed ejection fraction, the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) demonstrated that implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) statistically improved survival compared to the antiarrhythmic drug arm, most of whose patients were taking amiodarone. In patients with histories of sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, the Cardiac Arrest Study in Seattle: Conventional Versus Amiodarone Drug Evaluation (CASCADE) trial demonstrated that empiric amiodarone lowered arrhythmic recurrence rates compared to other drugs guided by serial Holter or electrophysiologic studies. However, arrhythmic death rates were high in both treatment arms of the study. Several secondary prevention trials, including the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators Study (AVID), the Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS), and the Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg (CASH), have demonstrated the superiority of ICD therapy compared to empiric amiodarone in improving overall survival. Based on the above findings, amiodarone is safe to use in post-myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure patients that need antiarrhythmic therapy. Although amiodarone is effective in treating malignant arrhythmias, high-risk patients should be considered for an ICD as frontline therapy.

Implantable defibrillators and antiarrhythmic drugs in patients at risk for lethal arrhythmias

The high mortality rate and frequency of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with congestive heart failure has prompted numerous clinical trials aimed at reducing mortality by addressing arrhythmic death. Recently completed trials have suggested that for patients who have survived cardiac arrest, the preferred treatment may be an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). From the standpoint of primary prevention, implantable defibrillators and amiodarone have received the most attention. It remains unclear, however, to which patients these studies apply, and if and how the results might be generalized. No available studies confirm an additional benefit of pharmacologic or device-based antiarrhythmic therapy beyond that offered by optimal treatment with beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and lipid-lowering drugs in the majority of patients with cardiomyopathy. Clinical trials are ongoing to address these issues.

Class III drugs and congestive heart failure: focus on the congestive heart failure-survival trial of antiarrhythmic therapy

Patients with congestive heart failure frequently have ventricular arrhythmias on ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings and sudden cardiac death is seen in almost 50% of such patients. Many antiarrhythmic agents have been approved to suppress the arrhythmia in an effort to improve survival. Some sodium-channel blockers not only failed to improve survival but have been shown to be harmful. This led to the development of potassium-channel blockers, such as d-sotalol, amiodarone, dofetilide, and azimilide. d-Sotalol was associated with excess mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction; amiodarone seems to be potentially beneficial; and dofetilide has a neutral effect on mortality. The Sudden Cardiac Death Heart Failure Trial (SCD HEFT) is testing the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) against amiodarone and placebo. The ICDs appear to be superior to antiarrhythmic drugs in certain high-risk patients, although not proved in unstratified patients with heart failure.

Lessons from antiarrhythmic trials involving class III antiarrhythmic drugs

Beta-adrenergic blockers reduce mortality and sudden death in patients convalescing from myocardial infarction, and probably in patients with heart failure. However, the notion that class I antiarrhythmic drugs might save lives by suppressing the triggers of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias was proved incorrect when the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) demonstrated that patients, whose ventricular ectopics were successfully suppressed by a number of class I antiarrhythmic drugs, died more readily than similar patients when treated with drugs rather than the placebo. Attention was diverted to class III antiarrhythmic drugs for patients with a poor ejection fraction who survived myocardial infarction and those with heart failure. A preliminary metaanalysis of 3 trials (Basel Antiarrhythmic Study of Infarct Survival [BASIS], Polish Amiodarone Trial [PAT], and the Canadian Amiodarone Myocardial Infarction Arrhythmia Trial [CAMIAT]) suggested that amiodarone might reduce arrhythmic and all-cause mortality in high-risk post-myocardial-infarction (MI) patients. BASIS suggested that this was only true for patients with preserved ventricular function. Nevertheless, 2 major trials were instituted: the European Myocardial Infarct Amiodarone Trial (EMIAT) and the CAMIAT. Both reported similar results except that patients recruited because of high-density ventricular ectopy seemed to benefit a little more from amiodarone than did patients with poor ventricular function. Detailed analysis of these trials revealed important insights into the value of amiodarone.

Class III antiarrhythmic agents in cardiac failure: lessons from clinical trials with a focus on the Grupo de Estudio de la Sobrevida en la Insuficiencia Cardiaca en Argentina (GESICA)

The results of previous clinical trials, in a variety of clinical settings, showed that class I agents may consistently increase mortality in sharp contrast to the effects of beta blockers. Attention has therefore shifted to class III compounds for potential beneficial effects on long-term mortality among patients with underlying cardiac disease. Clinical trials with d-sotalol, the dextro isomer (devoid of beta blockade) of sotalol, showed increased mortality in patients with low ejection fraction after myocardial infarction and in those with heart failure; whereas in the case of dofetilide, the impact on mortality was neutral. Because of the complex effects of its actions as an alpha-adrenergic blocker and a class III agent, the impact on mortality of amiodarone in patients with heart failure is of particular interest. A meta-analysis of 13 clinical trials revealed significant reductions in all-cause and cardiac mortality among patients with heart failure or previous myocardial infarction. Among these were 5 controlled clinical trials that investigated the effects of amiodarone on mortality among patients with heart failure. None of these trials was large relative to the beta-blocker trials in the postinfarction patients. However, the larger 2 of the 5 amiodarone trials produced discordant effects on mortality, neutral in one and significantly positive in the other. Some of the differences may be accounted for by the differences in eligibility criteria and baseline characteristics. Future trials that may be undertaken to resolve the discrepancies may need to allow for the newer findings on the effects of concomitant beta blockers, implantable devices, and possibly, spironolactone. All these modalities of treatment have been shown in controlled clinical trials to augment survival in patients with impaired ventricular function or manifest heart failure. Additional trials, some of which are currently in progress, compare amiodarone with implantable devices and other therapeutic interventions, and should help to clarify the optimal management strategy for patients with underlying heart failure.

Mortality reduction by antiadrenergic modulation of arrhythmogenic substrate: significance of combining beta blockers and amiodarone

Over the last 3 decades, there have been numerous experimental and clinical studies that utilized beta blockers for acute as well as chronic myocardial syndromes, especially in the setting of myocardial infarction in which the focus has been on mortality reduction. The results of these studies demonstrated the benefits of these agents at all stages of coronary artery disease. Although these data have always indicated that beta blockade per se is an antiarrhythmic as well as an antifibrillatory mechanism, the recognition of this phenomenon has been slow in finding universal appreciation. More recent studies have evaluated the additive role of beta blockers to newer therapies. A number of investigations have now established that this class of drugs does exert antifibrillatory action in preventing the occurrence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF), thereby reducing sudden arrhythmic death and prolonging survival. It is of interest that 2 of the leading antiarrhythmic drugs, amiodarone and sotalol, also have antiadrenergic properties. This article reviews the expanding role of beta-blocking drugs in the control and prevention of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias with a particular focus on the evidence for synergistic benefits when they are combined with other interventions, especially amiodarone.

Antiarrhythmic agents for atrial fibrillation: focus on prolonging atrial repolarization

Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been the subject of considerable attention and intensive clinical research in recent years. Current opinion among physicians on the management of AF favors the restoration and maintenance of normal sinus rhythm. This has several potential benefits, including the alleviation of arrhythmia-associated symptoms, hemodynamic improvements, and possibly a reduced risk of thromboembolic events. After normal sinus rhythm has been restored, antiarrhythmic therapy is necessary to reduce the frequency of AF recurrence. In the selection of an antiarrhythmic agent, both efficacy and safety should be taken into consideration. Many antiarrhythmic agents have the capacity to provoke proarrhythmia, which may result in an increase in mortality. This is of particular concern with sodium-channel blockers in the context of patients with structural heart disease. Flecainide and propafenone are well tolerated and effective in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients without significant cardiac disease but with AF. Recent interest has focused on the use of class III antiarrhythmic agents, such as amiodarone, sotalol, dofetilide (recently approved), ibutilide (approved for chemical conversion of AF and atrial flutter), and azimilide (still to be approved) in patients with AF and structural heart disease. To date, amiodarone and sotalol still hold the greatest interest, and although controlled clinical trials with these agents have been few, a number are in progress and some have been recently completed. These agents are effective in maintaining normal sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF and are associated with a low incidence of proarrhythmia when used appropriately. Because of the relative paucity of placebo-controlled trials of antiarrhythmic agents in patients with AF, experience until recently has tended to dictate treatment decisions. Increasingly, selection of drug therapy is being based on a careful and individualized benefit-risk evaluation by means of controlled clinical trials, an approach that is likely to dominate the overall approach to the control of atrial fibrillation in the largest numbers of cases of the arrhythmia. Pharmacologic therapy is likely to be dominated by compounds that exert their predominant effect by prolonging atrial repolarization.

Antiarrhythmic efficacy of selective blockade of the cardiac slowly activating delayed rectifier current, I(Ks), in canine models of malignant ischemic ventricular arrhythmia

BACKGROUND

To date, the lack of potent and selective inhibitors has hampered the physiological assessment of modulation of the cardiac slowly activating delayed rectifier current, I(Ks). The present study, using the I(Ks) blocker L-768,673, represents the first in vivo assessment of the cardiac electrophysiological and antiarrhythmic effects of selective I(Ks) blockade.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In an anesthetized canine model of recent (8.5+/-0.4 days) anterior myocardial infarction, 0.003 to 0.03 mg/kg L-768,673 IV significantly suppressed electrically induced ventricular tachyarrhythmias and reduced the incidence of lethal arrhythmias precipitated by acute, thrombotically induced posterolateral myocardial ischemia. Antiarrhythmic protection afforded by L-768,673 was accompanied by modest 7% to 10% increases in noninfarct zone ventricular effective refractory period, 3% to 5% increases in infarct zone ventricular effective refractory period, and 4% to 6% increases in QTc interval. In a conscious canine model of healed (3 to 4 weeks) anterior myocardial infarction, ventricular fibrillation was provoked by transient occlusion of the left circumflex coronary artery during submaximal exercise. Pretreatment with 0.03 mg/kg L-768,673 IV elicited a modest 7% increase in QTc, prevented ventricular fibrillation in 5 of 6 animals, and suppressed arrhythmias in 2 additional animals.

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings suggest that selective blockade of I(Ks) may be a potentially useful intervention for the prevention of malignant ischemic ventricular arrhythmias.

The role of antiarrhythmic therapy in the management of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia

The incidence of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) after myocardial infarction (MI), has decreased significantly in the thrombolytic era and may not have a high enough power to predict sudden cardiac death or all-cause mortality post-MI. Nonetheless, noninvasive algorithms that utilize the combination of NSVT with left ventricular dysfunction, abnormal signal-averaged electrocardiogram, and heart rate variability can be used for better risk assessment. Recent multicenter studies have provided strong evidence for the use of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients with NSVT and inducible sustained ventricual tachycardia. On the other hand anti-arrhythmic drugs have no role and most are harmful in asymptomatic patients post-MI with NSVT.

Pharmacotherapy of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a widespread health problem and the drugs available for its treatment suffer from several drawbacks, including potentially lethal proarrhythmia, serious non-cardiac toxicity and limited efficacy. The evidence for efficacy of currently available anti-arrhythmic agents for sinus rhythm restoration and maintenance is reviewed, with emphasis on randomised trials when available. The current approach to thromboembolism prophylaxis in AF is summarised.

Evaluation of antiarrhythmic drug efficacy in patients with an ICD: unlimited potential or replete with complexity and problems?

There are a number of novel ways in which implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) endpoints can be used in clinical trials to evaluate antiarrhythmic drugs. The advances in ICD technology (storage, retrieval, and accurate interpretation of ICD electrograms) expand the potential to include the use of an ICD endpoint as a clinical surrogate for sudden death. The ICD also provides the necessary safety net to test new drugs. The frequent need for antiarrhythmic drugs in patients already fitted with an ICD (e.g., for atrial fibrillation) necessitates knowledge of the drugs' effect on defibrillator threshold. There are interpretative problems and challenges associated with all types of ICD trials. A particular difficult issue is the degree to which the results of data on antiarrhythmic drug efficacy and safety acquired in the context of an ICD endpoint trial might be extrapolated to patient populations in which the device is not used. These and other challenging issues are discussed, with the goal of enhancing the design and interpretation of clinical trials featuring ICD endpoints.

Interactions of antiarrhythmic drugs with implantable defibrillator therapy for atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have proven highly successful in the treatment of recurrent ventricular and atrial arrhythmias. Despite their high efficacy in terminating arrhythmias, concomitant therapy with antiarrhythmic drugs in ICD recipients remains common. Antiarrhythmic drugs are employed in an attempt to to limit patient exposure to high-energy shocks, primarily by reducing the number of arrhythmia reccurrences, suppressing coexisting arrhythmias, affecting rate and organization of tachycardias, and increasing efficacy of painless pacing therapies. Data regarding interaction of antiarrhythmic drugs with ICDs are incomplete and mostly based on animal models; however, it is clear that antiarrhythmic drugs affect all aspects of function of devices such as defibrillation threshold, pacing threshold, and sensing of both atrial and and ventricular arrhythmias. Because significant change in any of these functions may result in a nonfunctional device, and magnitude of drug effect in an individual patient is unpredictable, careful assessment of ICD function after an institution of therapy with antiarrhythmic drugs is mandatory.

Chronic Heart Failure

Physicians must aggressively treat heart failure in the early stages to prevent disease progression and improve survival. Early treatment implies early diagnosis of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, before the onset of symptoms. Patients with risk factors for the development of heart failure, especially coronary disease or hypertension, should undergo echocardiography to evaluate LV function. Patients with LV systolic dysfunction should be further evaluated to determine the type of cardiac dysfunction, uncover correctable etiologic factors, determine prognosis, and guide treatment. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta-adrenergic blocking drugs improve survival and are integral to the treatment plan. Physicians should prescribe an ACE inhibitor as initial therapy for all patients with LV systolic dysfunction unless there are specific contraindications. The combination of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate is an acceptable alternative therapy for patients who cannot take ACE inhibitors. Diuretics should be used if there are signs or symptoms of volume overload. Beta-adrenergic blocking drugs should be added to therapy in stable patients with mild to moderate heart failure after optimal treatment with ACE inhibitors, diuretics, or other vasodilators. Digoxin should be used routinely in patients with severe heart failure and should be added to therapy in patients with mild to moderate heart failure who remain symptomatic despite optimal doses of ACE inhibitors and diuretics. Spironolactone should be added, but electrolytes should be closely monitored. Warfarin anticoagulation should be considered in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 35% or less. Until survival data exist, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) should not be used as initial therapy or as sole therapy but can be used for ACE-intolerant patients or can be added to standard heart failure therapy. Outpatient use of intravenous inotropic therapy should be avoided. Patients with severe heart failure should have peak oxygen consumption measured to quantify functional impairment, determine prognosis, and identify the need for advanced heart failure therapy. Patients who remain symptomatic while receiving optimal standard therapy should be referred early to a specialized heart failure center.

Chlamydia pneumoniae infection of vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells activates NF-kappaB and induces tissue factor and PAI-1 expression: a potential link to accelerated arteriosclerosis

BACKGROUND

Recent reports link C. pneumoniae infection of arteriosclerotic lesions to the precipitation of acute coronary syndromes, which also feature tissue factor and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) overexpression. We investigated whether or not C. pneumoniae can induce thrombogenicity by upregulation of procoagulant proteins.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Human vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells were infected with a strain of C. pneumoniae isolated from an arteriosclerotic coronary artery. Tissue factor, PAI-1, and interleukin-6 expression was increased in infected cells. Concomitantly, NF-kappaB was activated and IkappaBalpha degraded. p50/p65 heterodimers were identified as the components responsible for the NF-kappaB activity.

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide evidence that C. pneumoniae infection can induce procoagulant protein and proinflammatory cytokine expression. This cellular response is accompanied by activation of NF-kappaB. Our results demonstrate how C. pneumoniae infection may initiate acute coronary syndromes.

Dofetilide in patients with congestive heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction. Danish Investigations of Arrhythmia and Mortality on Dofetilide Study Group

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation occurs frequently in patients with congestive heart failure and commonly results in clinical deterioration and hospitalization. Sinus rhythm may be maintained with antiarrhythmic drugs, but some of these drugs increase the risk of death.

METHODS

We studied 1518 patients with symptomatic congestive heart failure and severe left ventricular dysfunction at 34 Danish hospitals. We randomly assigned 762 patients to receive dofetilide, a novel class III antiarrhythmic agent, and 756 to receive placebo in a double-blind study. Treatment was initiated in the hospital and included three days of cardiac monitoring and dose adjustment. The primary end point was death from any cause.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 18 months, 311 patients in the dofetilide group (41 percent) and 317 patients in the placebo group (42 percent) died (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.11). Treatment with dofetilide significantly reduced the risk of hospitalization for worsening congestive heart failure (risk ratio, 0.75; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.63 to 0.89). Dofetilide was effective in converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. After one month, 22 of 190 patients with atrial fibrillation at base line (12 percent) had sinus rhythm restored with dofetilide, as compared with only 3 of 201 patients (1 percent) given placebo. Once sinus rhythm was restored, dofetilide was significantly more effective than placebo in maintaining sinus rhythm (hazard ratio for the recurrence of atrial fibrillation, 0.35; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.57; P<0.001). There were 25 cases of torsade de pointes in the dofetilide group (3.3 percent) as compared with none in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with congestive heart failure and reduced left ventricular function, dofetilide was effective in converting atrial fibrillation, preventing its recurrence, and reducing the risk of hospitalization for worsening heart failure. Dofetilide had no effect on mortality.

Management of ventricular arrhythmias: a trial-based approach

Sudden cardiac death accounts for approximately 300,000 deaths annually in the U.S., and most of these are secondary to ventricular tachycardia (VT) and fibrillation in patients with coronary artery disease. Most patients with cardiac death die before reaching the hospital, which brought about a tremendous amount of research focused at identifying patients at high risk. Several trials were initiated to test the effectiveness of various therapeutic measures in these high-risk patients. A history of myocardial infarction, depressed left ventricular function and nonsustained VT have all been identified as independent risk factors for future arrhythmic death. Similarly, patients with a history of sustained VT or a history of sudden cardiac death are a high-risk group and should be aggressively evaluated and treated. The purpose of this article is to discuss risk stratification and primary prevention of sustained ventricular arrhythmias. We also review the recent secondary prevention trials and discuss the options available in the management of patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias.

Preventing sudden death after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: complex therapy for complex patients

Sudden arrhythmic death in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot or its variants has a variety of causes. Consequently, it can serve as a paradigm for management of potentially malignant arrhythmias in all pediatric patients, particularly with regard to the use of nonpharmacologic therapy for management. Five cases are presented as touchpoints for discussion and demonstrate a number of important issues concerning the assessment and reduction of sudden cardiac death risk in these patients. First, there are no clinical parameters that can be used to accurately assess risk. Second, pharmacologic agents alone rarely are adequate therapy. Third, catheter ablation and antitachycardia devices continue to play an ever increasing role in management of these patients, and, finally, additional data are necessary to establish clear management guidelines in patients with congenital heart disease at risk for arrhythmic death.

Clinical features of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome is the most common form of ventricular preexcitation. Understanding this syndrome is fundamental for anyone interested in learning about arrhythmias. This review addresses (1) the historic sequence of events that led to the understanding of this syndrome; (2) the pathologic, embryologic, and electrophysiologic properties of accessory pathways; (3) the epidemiology and genetics of this syndrome; (4) the clinical diagnosis of this syndrome, with special emphasis on the arrhythmias that patients with ventricular preexcitation are predisposed to; and (5) the therapy for patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.

Protection against ventricular fibrillation by the PAF antagonist, BN-50739, involves an ischaemia-selective mechanism

The platelet-activating factor (PAF) antagonist BN-50739 can suppress certain cardiac arrhythmias. PAF is released from ischaemic myocardium and may contribute to initiation of ischaemia-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF). In this study we characterised the action of BN-50739 on left regional ischaemia-induced VF and examined whether effects are mediated within the ischaemic territory, or are nonspecific. In rat isolated Langendorff perfused hearts (n = 12/group), 10 microM BN-50739 reduced the incidence of ischaemia-induced VF from 75 to 17% (p<0.05). This was accompanied by QT widening and an increase in coronary flow. Heart rate and PR interval were not affected by the drug. In separate studies, isolated rat hearts were perfused by using a dual-lumen tube that allows independent delivery of solution to the left and right coronary beds. Successful regional localisation of drug delivery was confirmed by observing, before ischaemia, a regionally selective increase in coronary flow (p<0.05), measured by using two in-line flow meters. Protection against ischaemia-induced VF (p<0.05) was achieved by pretreatment with BN-50739, delivered selectively and entrapped within the involved region, but not when the drug was delivered to the uninvolved region. In conclusion, BN-50739 protects against ischaemia-induced VF by eliciting a pharmacologic action in the involved (ischaemic) myocardium. This supports the hypothesis that BN-50739 suppresses an arrhythmogenic effect of endogenous PAF released within the ischaemic tissue.