Update of EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis

Tocilizumab Treatment of Patients with Systemic Sclerosis: Clinical Data

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an immune-mediated disease characterized by progressive, and often severe, inflammation and fibrosis of the skin and internal organs, such as the lungs, heart, kidneys, and gastrointestinal tract. There is an unmet medical need to treat patients with SSc given the high SSc-related mortality rate. Furthermore, disease-modifying therapies are lacking, and current treatment options focus on the management of individual organ-specific complications associated with the disease. Immunosuppressive therapies are the mainstay of pharmacologic management of major SSc-associated complications, such as skin and lung manifestations, but their overall effectiveness is limited and toxicity issues are common. Advances in understanding of the pathological processes involved in the immunologic and fibrotic mechanisms of SSc have led to clinical research focusing on targeted immunotherapies, in an effort to develop much needed disease-modifying treatment options. The interleukin-6 receptor-alpha antagonist tocilizumab has demonstrated promising efficacy in a phase 2 trial and is being investigated in a phase 3 trial. This article provides an overview of current pharmacologic treatment options for the management of SSc-related complications and discusses tocilizumab for the treatment of SSc in clinical trials.

Preliminary safety and efficacy profile of prucalopride in the treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related intestinal involvement: results from the open label cross-over PROGASS study

BACKGROUND

Prokinetics are used to treat enteric dismotility symptoms in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients, but they often lack adequate efficacy. The most effective prokinetics belonging to the serotonin (5-HT4) receptor agonists class were withdrawn due to cardiac toxicity in relation to modest 5-HT4 receptor affinity. Prucalopride is a high-affinity 5-HT4 receptor agonist with no major cardiac issues, for which the efficacy in SSc has not yet been assessed.

METHODS

Forty patients with self-reported mild to moderately severe enteric symptoms were enrolled in a cross-over 2 × 2 study. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to prucalopride 2 mg/day or no treatment for one month and vice versa after a 2-week washout period. Before and after each sequence the patients compiled the University of California Los Angeles gastrointestinal tract (UCLA GIT) 2.0 questionnaire and the numbers of complete intestinal movements were recorded. Oro-cecal transit time (OCTT) was evaluated by lactulose breath test in a subgroup of patients. Data were evaluated by mixed linear models corrected for the number of laxatives used during the study periods.

RESULTS

There were 29 subjects who completed the study; 7 subjects withdrew due to side-effects and 4 subjects were not compliant with the study procedures. As compared to dummy treatment, prucalopride was associated with more intestinal evacuations (p < 0.001), improvement of UCLA GIT constipation (-0.672 ± 0.112 vs 0.086 ± 0.115; p < 0.001), reflux (-0.409 ± 0.094 vs 0.01 ± 0.096; p < 0.005) and bloating (-0.418 ± 0.088 vs -0.084 ± 0.09; p = 0.01) scores. Treatment was ranked moderately to more than moderately effective by 22 patients (72.4%). OCTT was significantly reduced during prucalopruide consumption (prucalopride: -20.1 ± 20.1 vs no treatment: 45.8 ± 21.3 minutes; treatment effect = -65.9 minutes; p = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

The safety profile of prucalopride in SSc is similar to what is known from the literature. In patients with mild to severe gastrointestinal problems, prucalopride may be effective in treating dismotility symptoms, increasing the number of complete bowel movements and improving bowel transit, reducing reflux disease and bloating.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EU Clinical Trial Registry, EudraCT2012-005348-92 . Registered on 19 February 2013.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension in scleroderma: care gaps in screening

One in six patients with systemic sclerosis will develop pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Screening with echocardiography and possibly pulmonary function testing (to determine the diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide) is recommended to detect PAH at a less severe stage. However, real-world screening programs have problems. Registries where echocardiograms are to be performed annually should have the best-case scenario of nearly perfect screening and referral for right heart catheterization of those highly suspect for PAH. However, registries demonstrate care gaps where patients are not referred for appropriate confirmatory testing when PAH is suspected.

Use of biologics and other novel therapies for the treatment of systemic sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by vasculopathy, inflammation and fibrosis. These three main disease-determining pathways are the target of the currently available treatments used to possibly modify the progression of disease-related manifestations, although this synergy has not been fully applied on SSc joint, skin or lung involvement yet. Areas covered: we describe the current status of SSc treatment/therapy performing a literature search in MEDLINE/Pubmed and Thomson Reuter's Web of Science for articles published until March 2016. Moreover, ongoing registered clinical trials (RCTs) on SSc were searched through clinicaltrials.gov website. Expert commentary: presently, promising drugs are under evaluation to target the different pathogenic pathways of systemic sclerosis: Tocilizumab and Abatacept for skin and lung fibrosis; Riociguat and Selexipag are approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension but promising anti-fibrotic effects are now being studied. Finally, several anti-fibrotic molecules are currently involved in RCTs, such as Nintedanib, IVA-337, Terguride.

Evidence-based management of systemic sclerosis: Navigating recommendations and guidelines

OBJECTIVES

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare heterogeneous connective tissue disease. Recommendations addressing the major issues in the management of SSc including screening and treatment of organ complications are needed.

METHODS

The updated European League Against Rheumatism/European Scleroderma Trial and Research (EULAR/EUSTAR) and the British Society of Rheumatology (BSR) and British Health Professionals in Rheumatology (BHPR) guidelines were compared and contrasted.

RESULTS

The updated EULAR/EUSTAR guidelines focus specifically on the management of SSc features and include data on newer therapeutic modalities and mention a research agenda. These recommendations are pharmacologic, with few guidelines regarding investigations and non-pharmacologic management. Recommendations from BSR/BHPR are similar to the organ manifestations mentioned in the EULAR/EUSTAR recommendations, and expand on several domains of treatment, including general measures, non-pharmacologic treatment, cardiac involvement, calcinosis, and musculoskeletal features. The guidelines usually agree with one another. Limitations include the lack of guidance for combination or second-line therapy, algorithmic suggestions, the absence of evidence-based recommendations regarding the treatment of specific complications (i.e., gastric antral ectasia and erectile dysfunction). Consensus for when to treat interstitial lung disease in SSc is lacking. There are differences between Europe and North American experts due to access and indications for certain therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Care gaps in SSc have been demonstrated so the EULAR/EUSTAR and BSR/BHP guidelines can promote best practices. Certain complications warrant active investigation to further improve outcomes in SSc and future updates of these recommendations. Care gaps in SSc have been demonstrated so the EULAR/EUSTAR and BSR/BHP guidelines can promote best practices. Certain complications warrant active investigation to further improve outcomes in SSc.

[Digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis : A retrospective heath service study analysing treatment with bosentan and other vasoactive therapies]

BACKGROUND

Digital ulcers (DU) affect up to 60 % of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and have a considerable impact on quality of life and morbidity. It is unclear to what extent authorised medicines are used, and if therapy guidelines are implemented in everyday practice.

METHOD

This retrospective health care study examined current standards of treatment for therapy and prevention of SSc-associated DU in an online survey with 83 physicians. Additionally, data from 161 case studies of SSc patients with DU were analysed, and the effect of DU treatment on the course of the disease determined.

RESULTS

For treatment and prevention of active DU, physicians predominantly indicated topical therapies, calcium channel blockers, iloprost and endothelin receptor antagonists. According to the case studies, 90 % of episodes with acute DU were treated with bosentan and iloprost in mono- or combination therapy. Preventive treatment was only administered during 50 % of episodes without DU, even after three or more phases with active DU. For the prevention of new DU, bosentan was used in mono- or combination therapy in 57 % of episodes without DU. Bosentan therapy during prevention shortened the following acute phase by 32 %. Additionally, continuous treatment with bosentan in acute and prevention phases reduced the duration of the following acute phase and increased the time to onset of new DU by 16 %. Moreover, bosentan stabilised the number of new DU.

CONCLUSION

In summary, these data confirm the efficacy of bosentan in preventing new DU when used in DU-free episodes and possibly also in phases of acute DU. Therapy recommendations for the treatment of DU are currently not fully implemented. In the future, even more attention should be paid to DU therapy.