Long-term results from a randomized phase II trial of standard- versus higher-dose imatinib mesylate for patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors expressing KIT

Post-imatinib surgery in advanced/metastatic GIST: is it worthwhile in all patients?

BACKGROUND

Surgical indication for metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) treated with imatinib is not yet established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 80 patients who underwent surgery for metastatic GIST after imatinib therapy from July 2002 to October 2007. Patients were divided into those with surgery at best clinical response (group A, n = 49) and those with surgery at focal progression (group B, n = 31). Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS).

RESULTS

Two-year postoperative PFS was 64.4% in group A and 9.7% in group B (P < 0.01). In group A, median PFS was not reached; in group B, it was 8 months. Median DSS from the time of imatinib onset was not reached in either group. Five-year DSS was 82.9% in group A and 67.6% in group B (P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis confirmed a significantly shorter PFS and DSS in group B. Surgical morbidity occurred in 13 patients (16.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery for focal progressive lesions could be considered as part of the second-line/third-line armamentarium in selected cases. Surgery of residual disease upon best clinical response seems associated with survival benefit compared with historical controls in similar patient collectives treated with imatinib alone. However, evidence from prospective randomized trials is needed to make definite recommendations.

Metastatic pleomorphic sarcoma to left atrium

Although several thousand patients are diagnosed with sarcoma annually in the United States, metastases to the heart are very uncommon. In this case report, an overall low frequency cancer presents masquerading with common cardiac symptomology. This case illustrates the importance for detailed diagnostic cardiac evaluations and heightened suspicion by physicians to consider metastatic disease to the heart in cancer patients with cardiovascular complications. Also discussed is a review of surgical and chemotherapeutic options for this problem.

Absence of progression as assessed by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors predicts survival in advanced GI stromal tumors treated with imatinib mesylate: the intergroup EORTC-ISG-AGITG phase III trial

PURPOSE

From February 2001 to February 2002, 946 patients with advanced GI stromal tumors (GISTs) treated with imatinib were included in a controlled EORTC/ISG/AGITG (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Italian Sarcoma Group/Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group) trial. This analysis investigates whether the response classification assessed by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), predicts for time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Per protocol, the first three disease assessments were done at 2, 4, and 6 months. For the purpose of the analysis (landmark method), disease response was subclassified in six categories: partial response (PR; > 30% size reduction), minor response (MR; 10% to 30% reduction), no change (NC) as either NC- (0% to 10% reduction) or NC+ (0% to 20% size increase), progressive disease (PD; > 20% increase/new lesions), and subjective PD (clinical progression).

RESULTS

A total of 906 patients had measurable disease at entry. At all measurement time points, complete response (CR), PR, and MR resulted in similar TTP and OS; this was also true for NC- and NC+, and for PD and subjective PD. Patients were subsequently classified as responders (CR/PR/MR), NC (NC+/NC-), or PD. This three-class response categorization was found to be highly predictive of further progression or survival for the first two measurement points. After 6 months of imatinib, responders (CR/PR/MR) had the same survival prognosis as patients classified as NC.

CONCLUSION

RECIST perfectly enables early discrimination between patients who benefited long term from imatinib and those who did not. After 6 months of imatinib, if the patient is not experiencing PD, the pattern of radiologic response by tumor size criteria has no prognostic value for further outcome. Imatinib needs to be continued as long as there is no progression according to RECIST.

Sunitinib treatment in pediatric patients with advanced GIST following failure of imatinib

BACKGROUND

Sunitinib inhibits KIT and other members of the split-kinase-domain family of receptor tyrosine kinases. Sunitinib prolongs survival in adult patients with imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). We report the experience with sunitinib in pediatric patients with advanced GIST following failure of imatinib.

PROCEDURE

Sunitinib therapy was provided through a treatment-use protocol. Patients were 10-17 years old at enrollment. All patients had GIST resistant to imatinib therapy. Sunitinib was administered daily for 4 weeks in 6-week treatment cycles. KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) genotyping of tumor tissue were performed.

RESULTS

One patient achieved a partial response, five patients had stable disease and one patient had progressive disease on sunitinib. The duration of disease stabilization was between 7 and 21+ months, with a mean of 15 months. Time to tumor progression was longer on sunitinib than on prior imatinib treatment for five of six patients. Two patients experienced grade 3 adverse events. All other adverse events were grade 1-2. None of the five patients tested had mutations in KIT or PDGFRA.

CONCLUSION

Sunitinib treatment was associated with substantial initial antitumor activity and acceptable tolerability in this group of pediatric patients with imatinib-resistant GIST.

Long-surviving patients with recurrent GIST after receiving cytoreductive surgery with imatinib therapy

In the treatment of recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), good prognoses may not be expected by surgery alone. Recently, imatinib has been applied for the treatment of GISTs, resulting in improved patient survival. However, long-term success is limited due to the development of resistance. Herein, we report two cases of long-surviving patients with recurrent GIST after receiving cytoreductive surgery with imatinib therapy. A 49 year-old man was diagnosed to a duodenal GIST with single hepatic metastasis, and an antrectomy including the duodenal lesion with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation were performed in April, 2002. After four months, a new metastatic hepatic lesion was identified. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation was done, and imatinib therapy was started. A 56 year-old man underwent laparoscopic segmental resection of the distal ileum and partial excision of parietal peritoneum in March, 2001 to treat a malignant GIST of the distal ileum that was attached to parietal peritoneum. After six months, recurrence of GIST with peritoneal seeding and hepatic metastasis was found, and he underwent cytoreductive surgery including right hemicolectomy and wedge resection of liver. After surgery, there was no residual tumor grossly and imatinib therapy was started. In both cases, they were doing well with no evidence of recurrence for 5 years with imatinib therapy. Therefore, in patients with a recurrent GIST, improved survival can be expected with imatinib therapy after cytoreductive surgery.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors and neuroendocrine tumors

OBJECTIVES

Patients with rare gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies can exhibit unique objective and subjective manifestations. This article is a primer for the fundamental understanding of some of these diseases, namely gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and therapeutic strategies.

DATA SOURCES

Epidemiologic data, published research reports, national guidelines for oncology practice, and personal experience.

CONCLUSION

Despite the rarity of GIST, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, gastric lymphoma, and adenocarcinoma of the small bowel, oncology nurses must be prepared to effectively assess, plan, and implement care strategies for these patients.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Caring for patients with uncommon GI malignancies is challenging for oncology nurses whose experience with these tumors is limited. Fundamental knowledge and awareness of resources can help to ensure optimal patient care. Case vignettes illustrate patient presentation and formulation of treatment recommendations.

Nilotinib in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours resistant to both imatinib and sunitinib

Patients diagnosed with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) who are resistant or intolerant to both imatinib and second-line sunitinib have a poor prognosis and few therapeutic options. We evaluated the efficacy of nilotinib, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in patients pretreated with imatinib and sunitinib. Fifty-two consecutive patients treated with oral nilotinib, 400mg twice daily, within the nilotinib compassionate use programme in 12 European cancer centres, were included in this retrospective analysis. Median age was 59 years (range 24-80), and all patients had WHO performance score better than 3. All patients had failed both imatinib and sunitinib pretreatment, either due to progressing GIST (96%) or intolerance (4%). Five patients (10%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2-18) responded to nilotinib and 19 patients (37%; 95% CI 24-50) achieved a disease stabilisation. Nilotinib was generally well tolerated, but six patients (12%) discontinued treatment due to intolerance. Median progression-free survival of nilotinib treatment was 12 weeks (95% CI 9-15; range 0-104) and median overall survival was 34 weeks (95% CI 3-65; range 2-135). Nilotinib is active in GIST resistant to both imatinib and sunitinib. These results warrant further investigation of nilotinib in GIST.

Imatinib plasma levels are correlated with clinical benefit in patients with unresectable/metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors

PURPOSE To study the pharmacokinetics (PK) of imatinib (IM) in patients with advanced GI stromal tumors (GISTs) treated in a randomized phase II study and to explore the potential relationship between IM plasma levels and long-term clinical outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to receive IM at 400 mg versus 600 mg daily. IM plasma levels were analyzed in a subset of patients (n = 73) for whom PK data on day 1 and at steady-state (SS, day 29) were available. IM PK was evaluated using a population PK approach. The relationship between IM plasma exposure and clinical outcome was explored by grouping patients into quartiles according to IM trough concentration (C(min)). The clinical outcome parameters evaluated include overall objective benefit rate (OOBR; complete response plus partial response plus stable disease) time to progression (TTP), and KIT genotyping. Results IM PK exposure showed a high inter-patient variability, and clinical outcomes were correlated with IM trough levels at SS. The median TTP was 11.3 months for patients in the lowest C(min) quartile (Q1, < 1,110 ng/mL) compared with more than 30 months for Q2 to Q4 (P = .0029). OOBR was also inferior in Q1 patients. In patients with GIST with KIT exon 11 mutations (n = 39), the OOBR was 67% for Q1 patients versus 100% for all others (P = .001). CONCLUSION In patients with advanced GIST, IM trough levels at SS were associated with clinical benefit. Patients with IM C(min) below 1,100 ng/mL showed a shorter TTP and lower rate of clinical benefit (OOBR). Further studies are justified to test whether monitoring IM plasma levels might optimize clinical outcomes for patients with GIST.

Kinase mutations and efficacy of imatinib in Korean patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors

PURPOSE

This study analyzed the relationship between treatment outcome and kinase mutational status in Korean patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Clinical data were collected from 113 consecutive patients with metastatic or unresectable GISTs treated with imatinib from June 2001 through June 2005 at five institutions in Korea. KIT exons 9, 11, 13, and 17 and PDGFRA exons 12 and 18 were examined.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 57 years (range, 31-82 years). The overall response rate was 67.2%. KIT mutations were found in exon 11 (n = 92, 81.4%) and exon 9 (n = 10, 8.8%). One patient had a PDGFRA exon 18 mutation. The overall mutation rate was 91.2%. Response rates were 68.4%, 50.0%, and 80.0% in patients with KIT exon 11 mutations, KIT exon 9 mutations, and no kinase mutations, respectively. With a median follow-up of 49.0 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 42.0 months and median overall survival (OS) time was not reached. PFS and OS times did not differ significantly according to KIT genotype.

CONCLUSION

This study was unable to find an association between KIT mutational status and clinical outcome of imatinib in Korean patients with advanced GISTs. There was a trend toward better outcomes for patients with wild-type KIT or exon 11 mutations compared with exon 9 mutations, although this was not statistically significant. Compared with previous studies in western populations, these results suggest that ethnic differences may influence the relationship between KIT genotype and clinical outcome to imatinib.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a clinical overview

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a disease that was poorly understood historically. In the last decade, it has undergone a major transformation, sparked by the landmark discovery of the central role of activating KIT mutations in its pathogenesis and recognition of KIT protein expression (CD 117) as a reliable diagnostic marker of disease. The introduction and subsequent US Food and Drug administration approval of imatinib mesylate in the treatment of metastatic or unresectable GIST in February 1, 2002 has thrust this hitherto little known disease into the center stage of oncology, and GIST has served as a model for rationally designed drug trials in the field of cancer therapeutics since.

Contemporary pathology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. The vast majority of GISTs harbor a KIT or PDGFRA mutation and express KIT by immunohistochemistry. However, KIT-negative tumors and tumors showing unusual morphologic features can cause major diagnostic problems. The ability to inhibit the active KIT or PDGFRA kinase with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and alternative drugs demands more than ever accurate tumor classification and risk assessment. This article focuses on the pathology of GIST, including unusual variants and morphologic changes resulting from treatment. Parameters for risk assessment, potentially helpful new immunohistochemical markers, differential diagnosis, and the application of molecular classification schemes are discussed.

Multidisciplinary treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) has been recognized as a unique tumor only in the last decade. Although rare as a clinical entity, there is much interest in the pathology and treatment because the KIT protooncogene mutation common to most GISTs can be inhibited by imatinib mesylate. Diagnosing and treating GIST requires a multidisciplinary approach, given the combination of pathologic and radiographic evaluation, surgical treatment, and oncologic care required to successfully treat patients with GIST.

Stage and histological grade of gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on a new approach are strongly associated with clinical behaviors

Tumor stage and grade for gastrointestinal stromal tumors are poorly defined. To develop a better evaluation system, we assessed 12 clinical and pathological parameters in 613 patients with follow-up information. These parameters were classified into two gross spread parameters including liver metastasis and peritoneal dissemination, five microscopic spread parameters including lymph node metastasis, vascular, fat, nerve and mucosal infiltration, and five histological parameters including mitotic count > or =10 per 50 high-power fields, muscularis propria infiltration, coagulative necrosis, perivascular pattern and severe nuclear atypia. The 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival of 293 patients without any of these predictive parameters of malignancy were 99 and 100%, respectively. They were regarded as nonmalignant and further evaluations on the stage and grade of these tumors were not performed. At least one and at most seven predictive parameters of malignancy were identified in 320 patients. For these patients, the 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 44% (mean 6.7 years) and 60% (mean 9.3 years), respectively. The disease-free survival showed significant difference between patients with and without gross spread (P<0.0001), with and without microscopic spread (P=0.0009). Disease-free survival and overall survival were associated with the number of predictive parameters of malignancy in patients without gross spread (P<0.0001 for both disease-free survival and overall survival), but not in patients with gross spread (P=0.882 and 0.441, respectively). Malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors could be divided into clinical stage I and II based on the absence and presence of gross spread, respectively. The degree of malignancy of patients in clinical stage I could be graded according to the number of predictive parameters of malignancy. Patients in clinical stage II were of the highest degree of malignancy regardless of the number of parameters. We found that the clinical stage and grade were strongly associated with prognosis.

Adjuvant imatinib mesylate after resection of localised, primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour is the most common sarcoma of the intestinal tract. Imatinib mesylate is a small molecule that inhibits activation of the KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha proteins, and is effective in first-line treatment of metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour. We postulated that adjuvant treatment with imatinib would improve recurrence-free survival compared with placebo after resection of localised, primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour.

METHODS

We undertook a randomised phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Eligible patients had complete gross resection of a primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour at least 3 cm in size and positive for the KIT protein by immunohistochemistry. Patients were randomly assigned, by a stratified biased coin design, to imatinib 400 mg (n=359) or to placebo (n=354) daily for 1 year after surgical resection. Patients and investigators were blinded to the treatment group. Patients assigned to placebo were eligible to crossover to imatinib treatment in the event of tumour recurrence. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival, and analysis was by intention to treat. Accrual was stopped early because the trial results crossed the interim analysis efficacy boundary for recurrence-free survival. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00041197.

FINDINGS

All randomised patients were included in the analysis. At median follow-up of 19.7 months (minimum-maximum 0-56.4), 30 (8%) patients in the imatinib group and 70 (20%) in the placebo group had had tumour recurrence or had died. Imatinib significantly improved recurrence-free survival compared with placebo (98% [95% CI 96-100] vs 83% [78-88] at 1 year; hazard ratio [HR] 0.35 [0.22-0.53]; one-sided p<0.0001). Adjuvant imatinib was well tolerated, with the most common serious events being dermatitis (11 [3%] vs 0), abdominal pain (12 [3%] vs six [1%]), and diarrhoea (ten [2%] vs five [1%]) in the imatinib group and hyperglycaemia (two [<1%] vs seven [2%]) in the placebo group.

INTERPRETATION

Adjuvant imatinib therapy is safe and seems to improve recurrence-free survival compared with placebo after the resection of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour.

FUNDING

US National Institutes of Health and Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

Monoclonal antibody DOG1.1 shows higher sensitivity than KIT in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, including unusual subtypes

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract. Approximately 85% of GISTs harbor activating mutations in the KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) gene and approximately 95% of GISTs are positive for KIT (CD117) by immunohistochemistry. Nevertheless, approximately 5% of GISTs lack KIT expression. Inhibition of KIT and PDGFRA by tyrosine kinase inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment of GISTs and demands accurate tumor classification. DOG1.1 is a recently described mouse monoclonal antibody reported to have superior sensitivity and specificity compared with KIT (CD117) and CD34. We evaluated this new antibody on a group of 81 GISTs obtained from 74 patients with special regard to KIT-negative GISTs (n=28), pediatric GISTs (n=11), and GISTs associated with neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) (n=16). Conventional GISTs (n=26) were also included. All conventional KIT-positive GISTs, all NF1-associated GISTs, and 9/11 pediatric GISTs expressed DOG1.1. DOG1.1 was expressed in 10/28 (36%) of KIT-negative tumors. The staining pattern was cytoplasmic and/or membranous. This study demonstrates that DOG1.1 is a sensitive immunohistochemical marker for GIST, comparable with KIT, with the additional benefit of detecting 36% of KIT-negative GISTs. DOG1.1 is also a sensitive marker for unusual GIST subgroups lacking KIT or PDGFRA mutations. In tumors that are negative for both KIT and DOG1.1, mutational screening may be required to confirm the diagnosis of GIST.

Emergency surgery in the era of molecular treatment of solid tumours

In the advancing era of molecular therapy of solid tumours, emergency treatment of complications, such as bowel perforation, haemorrhage, and tumour rupture, is likely to evolve into one of the main challenges of surgical oncology. These complications might be caused by disease progression from resistance to therapy, side-effects of therapy on normal vasculature, and therapeutic induction of excessively responding tumours. This Review outlines the probability and management of emergency operations during molecularly targeted therapy of solid tumours. Special attention is given to advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours and colorectal cancer, and therapy with imatinib, sunitinib, and bevacizumab.

Phase II trial of neoadjuvant/adjuvant imatinib mesylate (IM) for advanced primary and metastatic/recurrent operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): early results of RTOG 0132/ACRIN 6665

BACKGROUND

Therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) has changed significantly with the use of imatinib mesylate (IM). Despite the success of this drug in metastatic GIST, disease progression remains a perplexing clinical issue suggesting the need for multimodality management. There have been no prospective studies either evaluating the neoadjuvant use of IM in primary GIST or as a preoperative cytoreduction agent for metastatic GIST.

METHODS

RTOG 0132/ACRIN 6665 was a prospective phase II study evaluating safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant IM (600 mg/day) for patients with primary GIST or the preop use of IM in patients with operable metastatic GIST. The trial continued postop IM for 2 years.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were entered (52 analyzable), 30 patients with primary GIST (Group A) and 22 with recurrent metastatic GIST (Group B). Response (RECIST) in Group A was (7% partial, 83% stable, 10% unknown), in Group B (4.5% partial, 91% stable, 4.5% progression). Two-year progression free survival (Group A 83%, Group B 77%). Estimated overall survival (Group A 93%, Group B 91%). Complications of surgery and IM toxicity were minimal.

CONCLUSION

This trial represents the first prospective report of preop IM in GIST. This approach is feasible, requires multidisciplinary consultations, and is not associated with notable postop complications.

Metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the era of imatinib: improved survival and elimination of socioeconomic survival disparities

BACKGROUND

Imatinib was approved in 2002 for unresectable and metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Our objective was to determine if the introduction of imatinib coincided with improved survival from metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor in the U.S. population and in specific socioeconomic groups.

METHODS

Query of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry identified 552 patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor between 1995 and 2004. Year of diagnosis was categorized into two periods, 1995 to 2000 and 2001 to 2004, to account for the effect of imatinib. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to examine differences in survival between periods and among socioeconomic groups.

RESULTS

Median survival increased from 12 to 33 months from 1995 to 2000 to 2001 to 2004 (P < 0.001); survival at 47 months increased from 21% to 41%, respectively (P < 0.001). Median survival times for White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian or Pacific Islander, and for low-, middle-, and high-income groups increased significantly in the era of imatinib (all P < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, Black race [hazard ratio, 1.96; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.15-3.32; P = 0.013], Hispanic race (hazard ratio, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.14-3.88; P = 0.017), and low income (hazard ratio, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.13-2.89; P = 0.014) were associated with the poorest survival during the 1995 to 2000 period. During 2001 to 2004, these disparities in survival were no longer statistically apparent.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival from metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor has improved significantly in the era of imatinib. This improvement has been uniform across all socioeconomic groups, with concomitant elimination of socioeconomic survival disparities potentially due to an assistance program intended to provide universal access to imatinib therapy.

Imatinib mesylate induces quiescence in gastrointestinal stromal tumor cells through the CDH1-SKP2-p27Kip1 signaling axis

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are caused by activating mutations in the KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha receptor tyrosine kinase genes. Approximately 85% of GIST patients treated with imatinib mesylate achieve disease stabilization, however, often in the presence of residual tumor masses. Complete remissions are rare and a substantial proportion of patients develop resistance to imatinib. Our study was designed to determine whether imatinib-associated responses may account for these clinical findings. We report here that imatinib stimulates cellular quiescence in a proportion of GIST cells as evidenced by up-regulation of the CDK inhibitor p27(Kip1), loss of cyclin A, and reduced BrdUrd incorporation. Mechanistically, these events are associated with an imatinib-induced modulation of the APC/CDH1 signaling axis. Specifically, we provide evidence that imatinib down-regulates SKP2 and that this event is associated with increased nuclear CDH1, an activator of the APC that has been shown to regulate SKP2 stability. We also show that those GIST cells that do not undergo apoptosis in response to imatinib overexpress nuclear p27(Kip1), indicating that they have withdrawn from the cell cycle and are quiescent. Lastly, we provide evidence that a fraction of primary GISTs with high SKP2 expression levels may have an increased risk of disease progression. Taken together, our results support a model in which GIST cells that do not respond to imatinib by apoptosis are removed from the proliferative pool by entering quiescence through modulation of the APC/CDH1-SKP2-p27(Kip1) signaling axis. These results encourage further studies to explore compounds that modulate this pathway as antitumor agents in GISTs.

Early prediction of response to sunitinib after imatinib failure by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor

PURPOSE

Positron emission tomography with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) was used to evaluate treatment response in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) after administration of sunitinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, after imatinib failure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Tumor metabolism was assessed with FDG-PET before and after the first 4 weeks of sunitinib therapy in 23 patients who received one to 12 cycles of sunitinib therapy (4 weeks of 50 mg/d, 2 weeks off). Treatment response was expressed as the percent change in maximal standardized uptake values (SUV). The primary end point of time to tumor progression was compared with early PET results on the basis of traditional Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria.

RESULTS

Progression-free survival (PFS) was correlated with early FDG-PET metabolic response (P < .0001). Using -25% and +25% thresholds for SUV variations from baseline, early FDG-PET response was stratified in metabolic partial response, metabolically stable disease, or metabolically progressive disease; median PFS rates were 29, 16, and 4 weeks, respectively. Similarly, when a single FDG-PET positive/negative was considered after 4 weeks of sunitinib, the median PFS was 29 weeks for SUVs less than 8 g/mL versus 4 weeks for SUVs of 8 g/mL or greater (P < .0001). None of the patients with metabolically progressive disease subsequently responded according to RECIST criteria. Multivariate analysis showed shorter PFS in patients who had higher residual SUVs (P < .0001), primary resistance to imatinib (P = .024), or nongastric GIST (P = .002), regardless of the mutational status of the KIT and PDGFRA genes.

CONCLUSION

Week 4 FDG-PET is useful for early assessment of treatment response and for the prediction of clinical outcome. Thus, it offers opportunities to individualize and optimize patient therapy.

Dose escalation of imatinib after failure of standard dose in Korean patients with metastatic or unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumor

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the results of imatinib dose escalation in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) after disease progression on standard-dose imatinib.

METHODS

Clinical data from patients with metastatic or unresectable GISTs whose dose of imatinib was increased after disease progression on imatinib 400 mg/day were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

The 24 patients studied had a median age of 52 years. Imatinib dosing was escalated to 600 mg/day in 12 patients, then to 800 mg/day in four patients. The other 12 patients had dose escalation directly to 800 mg/day. Two patients (8.3%) achieved a partial response, and seven (29.2%) had stable disease. Six-month progression-free and overall survival rates were 33.3 and 70.7%, respectively. Dose escalation to 600 or 800 mg/day was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Imatinib dose escalation is feasible and well tolerated in patients with advanced GIST who progress on standard-dose therapy, producing clinical benefit in approximately 37% of patients.

Consensus approaches to best practice management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors are rare mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Progress in diagnosis has led to increased recognition of this disease, and the availability of effective, molecularly targeted therapy has revolutionised its management. Treatment of metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors with imatinib has led to unprecedented improvements in progression free and overall survival and there are ongoing investigations into the optimal pre‐operative and adjuvant use of imatinib. Second‐line sunitinib is now available for patients who develop resistance to imatinib, and third‐ and fourth‐line therapies are being investigated in clinical trials. In this ever‐changing environment, evidence from controlled clinical trials and the authors' experience were used to comprehensively outline current best practice management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Novel approaches to imatinib- and sunitinib-resistant GIST

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) generally arise from primary activating mutations in the KIT or PDGFRA genes that result in constitutive activation of receptor tyrosine kinase activity. Imatinib provides targeted therapy for GIST by inhibiting the KIT and PDGFR-alpha tyrosine kinases. Clinical benefit is achieved in approximately 85% of patients with unresectable or metastatic disease, with a median progression-free survival of 20 to 24 months. The mechanisms of acquired resistance to imatinib are heterogeneous, with most involving the emergence of secondary mutations in KIT exons 13, 14, or 17. In patients failing or intolerant to imatinib, the multitargeted agent sunitinib achieves durable disease control in approximately 50% of cases. Experimental treatment options beyond those currently available consist of other KIT-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as nilotinib, or agents targeting alternative pathways, such as antiangiogenic agents, mammalian target of rapamycin, RAF kinase, and chaperone inhibitors.

Molecular targeted therapy of digestive system neoplasms

Malignancies in digestive system (MIDS) are most common and they are major causes of tumor death in the world. Despite recent advances, patients with MIDS still have very poor prognosis. With the development of tumor molecular biology, especially clarification of the mechanism underlying molecular signaling pathway for tumor cell proliferation and growth, researchers have started a new field and direction of clinical tumor therapy, i.e., molecular targeted therapy, which was essentially effective in tumor treatment. This article elucidates the current status, latest advances and developing trends of molecular targeted therapy for MIDS.

Effects of erlotinib in EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancers with resistance to gefitinib

PURPOSE

Most lung cancers with activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations respond to gefitinib; however, resistance to this tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) invariably ensues. The T790M mutation occurs in 50% and MET amplification in 20% of TKI-resistant tumors. Other secondary mutations (D761Y and L747S) are rare. Our goal was to determine the effects of erlotinib 150 mg/d in EGFR mutated patients resistant to gefitinib 250 mg/d, because the EGFR TKI erlotinib is given at a higher biologically active dose than gefitinib.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Retrospective review of 18 EGFR mutated (exon 19 deletions, L858R, and L861Q) patients that were given gefitinib and subsequently erlotinib. Seven patients had tumor resampling after TKI therapy and were analyzed for secondary EGFR mutations and MET amplification.

RESULTS

Most patients (14 of 18) responded to gefitinib with median progression-free survival of 11 months (95% confidence interval, 4-16). After gefitinib resistance (de novo or acquired), 78% (14 of 18) of these patients displayed progressive disease while on erlotinib with progression-free survival of 2 months (95% confidence interval, 2-3). Six of 7 resampled patients acquired the T790M mutation, and 0 of 3 had MET amplification. Only 1 gefitinib-resistant patient with the acquired L858R-L747S EGFR, which in vitro is sensitive to achievable serum concentrations of erlotinib 150 mg/d, achieved a partial response to erlotinib.

CONCLUSIONS

In EGFR mutated tumors resistant to gefitinib 250 mg/d, a switch to erlotinib 150 mg/d does not lead to responses in most patients. These findings are consistent with preclinical models, because the common mechanisms of TKI resistance (T790M and MET amplification) in vitro are not inhibited by clinically achievable doses of gefitinib or erlotinib. Alternative strategies to overcome TKI resistance must be evaluated.

Correlation of kinase genotype and clinical outcome in the North American Intergroup Phase III Trial of imatinib mesylate for treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor: CALGB 150105 Study by Cancer and Leukemia Group B and Southwest Oncology Group

PURPOSE

Imatinib mesylate is standard treatment for patients who have advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), but not all patients benefit equally. In previous studies, GIST genotype correlated with treatment outcome and optimal imatinib dosing.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined the relationship between kinase genotype and treatment outcome for 428 patients enrolled on the North American phase III study SWOG S0033/CALGB 150105 and treated with either 400 mg or 800 mg daily doses of imatinib.

RESULTS

The presence of KIT exon 11-mutant genotype (n = 283) correlated with improved treatment outcome when compared with KIT exon 9-mutant (n = 32) and wild-type (WT; n = 67) genotypes for objective response (complete response [CR]/partial response [PR], 71.7% v 44.4% [P = .007]; and 44.6% [P = .0002], respectively); time to tumor progression (TTP; median 24.7 months v 16.7 and 12.8 months, respectively); and overall survival (OS; median 60.0 months v 38.4 and 49.0 months, respectively). The survival outcomes for patients with exon 9-mutant, exon 11-mutant or WT GIST were not affected by imatinib dose. However, there was evidence of improved response rates for patients with exon 9-mutant tumors treated with imatinib 800 mg versus 400 mg (CR/PR, 67% v 17%; P = .02). Patients who had CD117-negative GIST had similar TTP but inferior OS compared with patients who had CD117-positive disease, which suggests that patients who have CD117-negative GIST may benefit from imatinib treatment. In addition, we identified novel but rare mutations of the KIT extracellular domain (exons 8 and 9).

CONCLUSION

We confirmed the favorable impact of KIT exon 11 genotype when compared with KIT exon 9 and wild-type genotype for patients with advanced GIST who are treated with imatinib.

The insulin-like growth factor system as a potential therapeutic target in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

The majority of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are characterized by oncogenic gain-of-function mutations in the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) c-KIT with a minority in PDGFRalpha. Therapy for GISTs has been revolutionized by the use of the selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib mesylate (IM). For the subset (approximately 10-15%) of GISTs that lack oncogenic mutations in these receptors, the genetic changes driving tumorigenesis are unknown. We recently reported that the gene encoding the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) is amplified in a subset of GISTs, and the IGF-1R protein is overexpressed in wild-type and pediatric GISTs. In this report we present a more complete picture of the involvement of components of the insulin-like growth factor-signaling pathway in the pathogenesis of GISTs. We also discuss how the IGF pathway may provide additional molecular targets for the treatment of GISTs that respond poorly to IM therapy.

Genetic aberrations of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal neoplasm in the gastrointestinal tract and is associated with mutations of the KIT or PDGFRA gene. In addition, other genetic events are believed to be involved in GIST tumorigenesis. Cytogenetic aberrations associated with these tumors thus far described include loss of 1p, 13q, 14q, or 15q, loss of heterozygosity of 22q, numeric chromosomal imbalances, and nuclear/mitochondrial microsatellite instability. Molecular genetic aberrations include loss of heterozygosity of p16(INK4A) and p14(ARF), methylation of p15(INK4B), homozygous loss of the Hox11L1 gene, and amplification of C-MYC, MDM2, EGFR1, and CCND1. GISTs in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 appear to lack the KIT and PDGFRA mutations characteristic of GISTs and may have a different pathogenetic mechanism. Gene mutations of KIT or PDGFRA are critical in GISTs, because the aberrant versions not only are correlated with the specific cell morphology, histologic phenotype, metastasis, and prognosis, but also are the targets of therapy with imatinib and other agents. Furthermore, specific mutations in KIT and PDGFR appear to lead to differential drug sensitivity and may in the future guide selection of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Activation of the receptor tyrosine kinases involves a signal transduction pathway whose components (mitogen-activated protein kinase, AKT, phosphoinositide 3-kinase, mammalian target of rapamycin, and RAS) are also possible targets of inhibition. A new paradigm of classification, integrating the standard clinical and pathological criteria with molecular aberrations, may permit personalized prognosis and treatment.

Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Accurate risk stratification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has become increasingly important owing to emerging adjuvant systemic treatments. All GISTs have been considered to have some malignant potential, but this hypothesis is now seriously challenged by studies indicating that microscopic gastric GISTs that are common in the general population probably have little or no malignant potential. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus classification system, based on tumor size and mitotic count, is commonly used to assess patient prognosis after surgical resection. Large retrospective cohort studies from several countries now uniformly indicate that the NIH classification carries substantial prognostic value. In particular, patients with high-risk GIST (approximately 44% of all) have substantially poorer outcome than those with intermediate-risk (24%) or low/very low-risk GIST (32%), whose survival is not markedly inferior to that of the general population in some studies. Gastric GISTs (approximately 58% of all GISTs) have a lower risk of recurrence than nongastric tumors of the same size and mitotic count, and tumor rupture confers clearly increased risk. These 2 important risk stratification factors are not considered in the NIH classification. Patients with certain nongastric tumors (2.1-5 cm and > 5 mitoses per 50 high-power fields or 5.1-10 cm and < or = 5 per 50 high-power fields) and those with tumor rupture are proposed to be included in the NIH high-risk category. High-risk patients defined by the proposed modified system have more than 15% to 20% risk of disease recurrence. The proposed system, if validated, may be useful in identifying which patients might potentially benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Imatinib mesilate for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumour

BACKGROUND

The molecular hallmark of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs), the mutation of the KIT gene, was discovered 10 years ago. GISTs have since been recognized as separate pathological entities among sarcomas, and have become a model for targeted treatment of solid tumours. Imatinib mesilate, which was approved in 2002 for the treatment of patients with advanced GIST, has dramatically changed the course of the disease.

OBJECTIVE

This article will focus on the development of imatinib mesilate in the treatment of patients with GIST.

METHODS

A Pubmed search was performed using the keywords 'imatinib', 'gastrointestinal stromal', 'GIST', 'KIT' and 'PDGFR'. Websites of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Society of Medical Oncology were searched for data reported in abstract form at recent symposiums. Personal communications from opinion leaders were sought for additional information that might be relevant.

RESULTS

Imatinib has changed the clinical course of patients with advanced GISTs and further development in the adjuvant setting as well as prospective assessment of predictive factors are the current focus of ongoing research.

Relationship of imatinib-free plasma levels and target genotype with efficacy and tolerability

Imatinib has revolutionised the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) and gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). Using a nonlinear mixed effects population model, individual estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters were derived and used to estimate imatinib exposure (area under the curve, AUC) in 58 patients. Plasma-free concentration was deduced from a model incorporating plasma levels of alpha₁-acid glycoprotein. Associations between AUC (or clearance) and response or incidence of side effects were explored by logistic regression analysis. Influence of KIT genotype was also assessed in GIST patients. Both total (in GIST) and free drug exposure (in CML and GIST) correlated with the occurrence and number of side effects (e.g. odds ratio 2.7±0.6 for a two-fold free AUC increase in GIST; P<0.001). Higher free AUC also predicted a higher probability of therapeutic response in GIST (odds ratio 2.6±1.1; P=0.026) when taking into account tumour KIT genotype (strongest association in patients harbouring exon 9 mutation or wild-type KIT, known to decrease tumour sensitivity towards imatinib). In CML, no straightforward concentration–response relationships were obtained. Our findings represent additional arguments to further evaluate the usefulness of individualising imatinib prescription based on a therapeutic drug monitoring programme, possibly associated with target genotype profiling of patients.