The incidence of lateral pelvic side-wall nodal involvement in low rectal cancer may be similar in Japan and the West

Radiation Therapy Dose Escalation to Clinically Involved Pelvic Sidewall Lymph Nodes in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Purpose

Lateral pelvic sidewall lymph nodes (PSW LN) may be involved in up to 24% of locoregionally advanced rectal cancers. PSW LN are not resected in total mesorectal excision (TME), and no standard of care regarding the management of PSW LN exists in the United States. We assessed our institutional experience of preoperative radiation therapy (RT) boost to clinically involved PSW LN that were not planned for resection.

Methods and materials

Data from all patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated between 2006 and 2018 were reviewed to identify those who received a cumulative dose of >50.4 Gy to suspicious PSW LN during neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT). Demographic, cancer characteristic, treatment, and toxicity data were derived from the chart.

Results

Of a total of 261 patients, 12 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 47.5 years, and 83% of patients were men. All patients had T3/4 disease, 17% of patients had N1b disease and the remainder had N2 disease, and 33% had M1 disease (all ≤2 metastases). Seventy-five percent of patients had moderately or poorly differentiated histology. The mean distance from the anal verge was 4.85 cm (range, 2-8.9 cm), and 58% had ≥2 PSW LN with an average short axis diameter of 1.11 cm (range, 0.4-3.2 cm). Boost doses ranged from 53.48 Gy to 60.2 Gy in 27 to 30 fractions (1.8-2.15 Gy/fraction). The median follow-up time was 18 months. One patient who received concurrent capecitabine and irinotecan had grade 3 perineal dermatitis and anemia during nCRT. The median hospitalization time for TME was 6.5 days. Within 90 days of TME, 1 patient required surgical exploration for perineal wound breakdown, and another required a blood transfusion for anemia. At the time of the last follow up, 75% of patients were alive. Local control at 12 months was 90%.

Conclusions

RT dose escalation to nonresected PSW LN during nCRT was well tolerated with a low risk of acute toxicity and perioperative complications and has a high rate of local control at 12 months. RT boost warrants further study in patients with clinically involved nonresected PSW LN.

Neoadjuvant (Chemo)radiotherapy With Total Mesorectal Excision Only Is Not Sufficient to Prevent Lateral Local Recurrence in Enlarged Nodes: Results of the Multicenter Lateral Node Study of Patients With Low cT3/4 Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE

Improvements in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery, and the use of (chemo)radiotherapy ([C]RT) have improved local control of rectal cancer; however, we have been unable to eradicate local recurrence (LR). Even in the face of TME and negative resection margins (R0), a significant proportion of patients with enlarged lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) suffer from lateral LR (LLR). Japanese studies suggest that the addition of an LLN dissection (LLND) could reduce LLR. This multicenter pooled analysis aims to ascertain whether LLNs actually pose a problem and whether LLND results in fewer LLRs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 1,216 consecutive patients with cT3/T4 rectal cancers up to 8 cm from the anal verge who underwent surgery in a 5-year period were collected. LLND was performed in 142 patients (12%). MRIs were re-evaluated with a standardized protocol to assess LLN features.

RESULTS

On pretreatment MRI, 703 patients (58%) had visible LLN, and 192 (16%) had a short axis of at least 7 mm. One hundred eight patients developed LR (5-year LR rate, 10.0%), of which 59 (54%) were LLRs (5-year LLR rate, 5.5%). After multivariable analyses, LLNs with a short axis of at least 7 mm resulted in a significantly higher risk of LLR (hazard ratio, 2.060; P = .045) compared with LLNs of less than 7 mm. In patients with LLNs at least 7 mm, (C)RT plus TME plus LLND resulted in a 5-year LLR of 5.7%, which was significantly lower than that in patients who underwent (C)RT plus TME (5-year LLR, 19.5%; P = .042).

CONCLUSION

LLR is still a significant problem after (C)RT plus TME in LLNs with a short axis at least 7 mm on pretreatment MRI. The addition of LLND results in a significantly lower LLR rate.

Neoadjuvant (Chemo)radiotherapy With Total Mesorectal Excision Only Is Not Sufficient to Prevent Lateral Local Recurrence in Enlarged Nodes: Results of the Multicenter Lateral Node Study of Patients With Low cT3/4 Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE

Improvements in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery, and the use of (chemo)radiotherapy ([C]RT) have improved local control of rectal cancer; however, we have been unable to eradicate local recurrence (LR). Even in the face of TME and negative resection margins (R0), a significant proportion of patients with enlarged lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) suffer from lateral LR (LLR). Japanese studies suggest that the addition of an LLN dissection (LLND) could reduce LLR. This multicenter pooled analysis aims to ascertain whether LLNs actually pose a problem and whether LLND results in fewer LLRs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 1,216 consecutive patients with cT3/T4 rectal cancers up to 8 cm from the anal verge who underwent surgery in a 5-year period were collected. LLND was performed in 142 patients (12%). MRIs were re-evaluated with a standardized protocol to assess LLN features.

RESULTS

On pretreatment MRI, 703 patients (58%) had visible LLN, and 192 (16%) had a short axis of at least 7 mm. One hundred eight patients developed LR (5-year LR rate, 10.0%), of which 59 (54%) were LLRs (5-year LLR rate, 5.5%). After multivariable analyses, LLNs with a short axis of at least 7 mm resulted in a significantly higher risk of LLR (hazard ratio, 2.060; P = .045) compared with LLNs of less than 7 mm. In patients with LLNs at least 7 mm, (C)RT plus TME plus LLND resulted in a 5-year LLR of 5.7%, which was significantly lower than that in patients who underwent (C)RT plus TME (5-year LLR, 19.5%; P = .042).

CONCLUSION

LLR is still a significant problem after (C)RT plus TME in LLNs with a short axis at least 7 mm on pretreatment MRI. The addition of LLND results in a significantly lower LLR rate.

Lateral Lymph Node Dissection With the Focus on Indications, Functional Outcomes, and Minimally Invasive Surgery

The lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) is still a subject of great debate as to the appropriate treatment for patients with mid to low advanced rectal cancer. The guidelines of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum recommend a LLND for patients with T3/4 rectal cancer below the peritoneal reflection. However, in most Western countries, a routine LLND is not recommended unless a node or nodes are clinically suspicious for metastasis. Even after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), an 8% to 12% lateral pelvic recurrence was noted. The size of the lateral lymph node and responsiveness to preoperative CRT should be the main factors for selecting appropriate patients to undergo a LLND. In addition, from the recent literature, a laparoscopic LLND is safe and oncologically feasible and might have some advantages in short-term outcomes.

Session 4: Shaping radiotherapy for rectal cancer: should this be personalized?

Preoperative radiotherapy continues to be widely used in patients with operable rectal cancer. However, the indications and goals for such treatment are evolving. Professor Marijnen reviews the historic and current evidence base for the use of preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy and the future challenges in tailoring the therapy according to the patients' needs and tumour stage.

The Perfect Total Mesorectal Excision Obviates the Need for Anything Else in the Management of Most Rectal Cancers

This article discusses the local control of primary rectal cancer and its locoregional spread in the light of modern advances. In recent years, the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation has spread widely. However, its true benefit is not always balanced with its morbidities. Often total mesorectal excision (TME) is the best option. We will discuss the indications for immediate surgery for chemoradiation in advance and the importance of a delay in the management plan. To understand this selection, it is mandatory to know the true extent of tissue at risk for tumor dissemination and spread. Considering that TME may be enough for many patients and that most local recurrences are failures of surgical technique we introduce a new concept of total mesorectal irradiation. This exploits the new reality that precise, focused neoadjuvant therapy can offer a better response with fewer complications. Together these important changes in cancer board (multidisciplinary team) planning can also offer selected patients complete control of their cancer with no need for surgery.

Prophylactic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in stage IV low rectal cancer

AIM

To assess the clinical significance of prophylactic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) in stage IV low rectal cancer.

METHODS

We selected 71 consecutive stage IV low rectal cancer patients who underwent primary tumor resection, and enrolled 50 of these 71 patients without clinical LPLN metastasis. The patients had distant metastasis such as liver, lung, peritoneum, and paraaortic LN. Clinical LPLN metastasis was defined as LN with a maximum diameter of 10 mm or more on preoperative pelvic computed tomography scan. All patients underwent primary tumor resection, 27 patients underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) with LPLND (LPLND group), and 23 patients underwent only TME (TME group). Bilateral LPLND was performed simultaneously with primary tumor resection in LPLND group. R0 resection of both primary and metastatic sites was achieved in 20 of 50 patients. We evaluated possible prognostic factors for 5-year overall survival (OS), and compared 5-year cumulative local recurrence between the LPLND and TME groups.

RESULTS

For OS, univariate analyses revealed no significant benefit in the LPLND compared with the TME group (28.7% vs 17.0%, P = 0.523); multivariate analysis revealed that R0 resection was an independent prognostic factor. Regarding cumulative local recurrence, the LPLND group showed no significant benefit compared with TME group (21.4% vs 14.8%, P = 0.833).

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic LPLND shows no oncological benefits in patients with Stage IV low rectal cancer without clinical LPLN metastasis.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancer: A Subgroup Analysis of a Large Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection is the standard treatment for locally advanced low rectal cancer in Japan. However, the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection remain to be determined.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced low rectal cancer.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study using an exact matching method.

SETTING

We conducted a multicenter study of 69 specialized centers in Japan.

PATIENTS

Patients with consecutive midrectal or low rectal adenocarcinoma cancer stage II to III who underwent mesorectal excision with curative intent between 2010 and 2011 were recruited.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Short-term and oncological outcomes were compared between the laparoscopic and open-surgery groups.

RESULTS

Of the 1500 eligible patients, 676 patients who underwent lateral lymph node dissection were analyzed, including 137 patients who were treated laparoscopically and 539 patients who were treated with open surgery. After matching, the patients were stratified into laparoscopic (n = 118) and open-surgery (n = 118) groups. Operative times in the overall cohort were significantly longer (461 vs 372 min) in the laparoscopic versus the open-surgery group. In the laparoscopic group, the blood loss volume was significantly smaller (193 vs 722 mL), with fewer instances of blood transfusion (7.3% vs 25.5%) compared with the open-surgery group. The postoperative complication rates were 35.8% and 43.6% for the laparoscopic and open-surgery groups (p = 0.10). The 3-year relapse-free survival rates were 80.3% and 72.6% for the laparoscopic and open-surgery groups (p = 0.07).

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by its retrospective design and potential selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection is safe and feasible for cancer stage II to III low rectal cancer and is associated with similar oncological outcomes as open lateral lymph node dissection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A334.

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemo-radiation for preoperative enlarged lateral nodes in advanced low rectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Lateral lymph node (LLN) metastasis is a major cause of local recurrence of advanced rectal cancer. Although there is much controversy between Western and Eastern countries on whether lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LLND) or neoadjuvant chemo-radiation (nCRT) is preferable for the treatment of LLN metastases, existing retrospective cohorts mainly focus on all middle/low advanced rectal cancer patients, not the specific individuals with suspicion of LLN metastases. The aim of this trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of LLND for rectal cancer patients with suspicion of LLN metastases.

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled, single-blinded, phase III trial is designed to enroll 512 eligible patients with advanced rectal cancer and preoperative enlarged lateral lymph nodes. The population will be randomly assigned into the solely total mesorectal excision (TME) group or the TME + LLND group after eligible selection. The primary outcomes are to be 3-year local recurrence rate and 3-year disease-free survival, and the secondary outcomes include 3-year overall survival, 1-year sexual and urinary function, and perioperative outcomes.

DISCUSSION

This is the first randomized trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of LLND for advanced low rectal cancer patients with suspicion of LLN metastases; the result is expected to provide new evidence for the treatment of LLN where there is suspicion of metastases in advanced rectal cancer patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT02614157 ) Registered on 24 November 2015.

Is lateral pelvic node dissection necessary after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer patients with initially suspected lateral pelvic node?

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the effect of lateral pelvic node dissection after preoperative chemoradiotherapy on rectal cancer patients with initially suspected lateral pelvic nodes. The purpose of this study was to identify a subgroup of patients receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy who can benefit from lateral pelvic node dissection.

METHODS

The study included 580 patients who underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision. The lateral pelvic node responses to preoperative chemoradiotherapy were divided: group I (no suspected lateral pelvic node), lateral pelvic node <5 mm pre- and post-chemoradiotherapy; group II (responsive lateral pelvic node), lateral pelvic node ≥5 mm pre-chemoradiotherapy but <5 mm post-chemoradiotherapy; and group III (persistent lateral pelvic node), lateral pelvic node ≥5 mm pre- and post-chemoradiotherapy. Prognostic factors for lateral pelvic node recurrence-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, relapse-free survival, and overall survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

In a multivariate analysis, lateral pelvic node response was an independent factor associated with lateral pelvic node recurrence-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, relapse-free survival, and overall survival (P < .05). Group III had significantly poorer lateral pelvic node recurrence-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, relapse-free survival, and overall survival than groups II and I (74.1%, 93.4%, and 98.6%; 71.7%, 89.4%, and 97%; 56.9%, 76.6%, and 81.7%; 74.9%, 85.7%, and 89.1%, respectively; P < .05). Group II tended to have poorer lateral pelvic node recurrence-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, relapse-free survival, and overall survival than group I, and the differences in relapse-free survival and overall survival between the 2 groups were not significant (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that the subgroup with lateral pelvic nodes responsive to preoperative chemoradiotherapy may not benefit from lateral pelvic node dissection, and the subgroup with persistent lateral pelvic node may benefit from lateral pelvic node dissection.

Watch and wait after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer

Meticulous follow-up needed

Promises and pitfalls of total mesorectal excision: getting the best outcomes

The management of patients with rectal cancer has seen a number of important advances over the past 30 years. The most important of these has been the improvement and standardization of surgical technique. Combined with advances in preoperative imaging, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies and expert pathological assessment, widespread adoption of total mesorectal excision has led to improved results for this challenging but eminently curable cancer.

Recent advances in multidisciplinary approach for rectal cancer

Surgery is a major treatment option for rectal cancer, and total mesorectal excision has been demonstrated to be advantageous in terms of oncological outcome and thus has been the standard surgical approach. Radiotherapy before or after radical surgery is the optimal treatment to control local recurrence of advanced rectal cancer. To date, in many countries, the combination of neoadjuvant concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy is considered the standard therapy. A more recent interest in neoadjuvant therapy has been the use of oxaliplatin or targeted agents for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. However, despite many trials of oxaliplatin and targeted agents, 5-FU-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy has remained the only standard treatment option. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or induction chemotherapy with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy may further improve patient survival, as some clinical studies recently indicated. In Japan, neoadjuvant therapy is not the standard treatment method, because surgery with lateral lymph node dissection is usually performed and this type of surgery may reduce recurrence rate as does radiation therapy. The phase III study to evaluate the oncological effect of the Japanese standard operation (mesorectal excision, ME) with lateral lymph node dissection in comparison with ME alone for clinical stage II and III lower rectal cancer is currently ongoing.

Application of fluorescence in robotic general surgery: review of the literature and state of the art

The initial use of the indocyanine green fluorescence imaging system was for sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast or colorectal cancer. Since then, application of this method has received wide acceptance in various fields of surgical oncology, and it has become a valid diagnostic tool for guiding cancer treatment. It has also been employed in numerous conventional surgical procedures with much success and benefit to the patient. The advent of minimally invasive surgery brought with it a new use for fluorescence in helping to improve the safety of these procedures, particularly for single-site procedures. In 2010, a near-infrared camera was integrated into the da Vinci Si System, creating a combination of technical and minimally invasive advantages that have been embraced by several experienced surgeons. The use of fluorescence, although useful, is considered challenging. Only a few studies are currently available on the use of fluorescence in robotic general surgery, whereas many articles have focused on its application in open and laparoscopic surgery. Many of these reports describe promising and satisfactory results, although with some shortcomings. The purpose of this article is to review the current status of the use of fluorescence in general surgery and particularly its role in robotic surgery. We also review potential uses in the future.

Clinical feasibility of laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection following total mesorectal excision for advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the technical feasibility, safety and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with advanced low rectal cancer.

METHODS

Laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection was performed in 18 patients from November 2009 to September 2012. The data regarding the patient demographics, surgical outcomes and short-term oncological outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

In all 18 patients, the procedures were completed without conversion to open surgery. The mean length of the operation was 603.7 min (473-746 min). The mean number of harvested lateral pelvic lymph nodes was 16.9 (7-27), and five patients (27.8 %) had lymph node metastases. The postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 0 and 16.7 %, respectively. Three patients developed Grade 2 urinary retention. No local recurrence had developed after a mean follow-up period of 23.6 months.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is technically feasible, safe and oncologically acceptable within the limitations of the short-term follow-up period.

Can chemoradiation allow for omission of lateral pelvic node dissection for locally advanced rectal cancer?

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the relationship between pretreatment clinical parameters and lateral pelvic node (LPN) recurrence in patients with rectal cancer treated with a combination of curative resection and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and attempted to identify the patients who might benefit from LPN dissection.

METHODS

This study involved 900 patients between June 2001 and June 2009. Pretreatment clinical parameters including radiological size of LPN were analyzed to identify risk factors associated with long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Locoregional recurrence developed in 65 patients (7.2%); 42 (64.6%) had LPN recurrence, 20 (47.6%) of which had no distant metastasis. Multivariate analysis showed that LPN short-axis diameter (<5, 5-<10, and ≥10 mm) was significantly associated with LPN recurrence-free survival (5-year survival rate (5YSR), 98.2, 91.7, and 40.1%, respectively, P < 0.05), locoregional recurrence-free survival (5YSR, 95.5, 87.6, and 40.1%, respectively, P < 0.05), relapse-free survival (5YSR, 76.8, 72.5, and 30.3, respectively, P < 0.05), and overall survival (5YSR, 86.3, 83.0, and 57.5%, respectively, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with an LPN short-axis diameter ≥10 mm represent a potential subgroup at a high risk of LPN recurrence, even after CRT. Further study is needed to confirm whether LPN dissection is beneficial for these patients.

Total number of lymph node metastases is a more significant risk factor for poor prognosis than positive lateral lymph node metastasis

PURPOSE

Lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) along the iliac vessels are an important indicator of local recurrence; however, we are unaware of any study that investigates whether the number of LLN metastases influences the prognosis of patients with lower rectal cancer.

METHOD

We analyzed retrospectively the records of 154 patients who underwent radical resection of T1-4 lower rectal adenocarcinoma at a single institution.

RESULTS

Among the 88.3 % of patients who underwent LLN dissection, 13 (8.4 %) had LLN metastasis. The Cox proportional hazard model indicated that sex, histological grade, lymphatic or venous invasion, and LLN metastasis were not significantly associated with tumor recurrence, whereas tumor depth and more than three lymph node metastases were risk factors for recurrence (p = 0.002 and p = 0.02, respectively). Of the 13 patients with LLN metastasis, 6 whose mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) had been well dissected and examined did not have MLN metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of one or two LLN metastases in patients who have undergone LLN dissection with surgery for lower rectal cancer is not associated with poor prognosis. The number of LLN metastases is a more significant risk factor for poor prognosis.

Lateral lymph node dissection for lower rectal cancer

The mainstay of surgical therapy for rectal cancer is colectomy (including lesions) with lymph node dissection. The lymphatic spread of rectal cancer can proceed in two directions: medially toward the origin of the inferior mesenteric artery or laterally toward the pelvis aslong the internal iliac artery. To prevent postoperative recurrence, lymph nodes situated along these two axes should be adequately dissected, leaving no residual cancer cells. In Japan, the standard procedure for advanced lower rectal cancer is mesorectal excision and lateral lymph node dissection with autonomic nerve preservation. In Europe and North America, lateral lymph node dissection used to be performed, but it led to increased blood loss, complications, and dysfunction, with no improvement in survival. Lateral lymph node dissection is thus no longer performed. Instead, multidisciplinary therapy combining mesorectal excision with preoperative chemoradiotherapy is now the standard treatment for advanced rectal cancer. Although lateral lymph node dissection decreases the rate of local recurrence similar to preoperative chemoradiotherapy, whether it contributes to improved survival remains unclear. In addition, it is unlikely that prophylactic lateral lymph node dissection is required in all patients with rectal cancer. Definition of the indications for lateral lymph node dissection is thus an important concern.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy affects the indications for lateral pelvic node dissection in mid/low rectal cancer with clinically suspected lateral node involvement: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although lateral pelvic node dissection (LPND) is recommended for rectal cancer with clinically metastatic lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPNs), LPNs may respond to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Our aim was to determine the optimal indication for LPND after nCRT for mid/low rectal cancer.

METHODS

Of 2,263 patients with clinical stage II/III mid/low rectal cancer who were managed at three tertiary referral hospitals, 66 patients underwent curative surgery including LPND after nCRT were included in this study. Risk factors for LPN metastasis were retrospectively analyzed and oncologic outcomes determined according to LPN response to nCRT.

RESULTS

Persistent LPNs greater than 5 mm on post-nCRT magnetic resonance imaging were significantly associated with residual tumor metastasis, unlike responsive LPN after nCRT (short-axis diameter ≤ 5 mm) (pathologically, 61.1 % [22 of 36] vs. 0 % [0 of 30], P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed post-nCRT LPN size as a significant and independent risk factor for LPN metastasis (odds ratio 2.390; 95 % confidence interval 1.104-4.069). Over a median follow-up of 39.3 months, the recurrence rate was lower in patients with responsive nodes than in patients with persistent nodes (20 % [6 of 30] vs. 47.2 % [17 of 36], P = 0.012). The 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival rates were lower in patients with persistent LPN than in patients with responsive LPN (44.6 % vs. 77.1 %, P = 0.034; 33.7 % vs. 72.5 %, P = 0.011, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In mid/low rectal cancer with clinically metastatic LPNs, the decision to perform LPND should be based on the LPN response to nCRT.

Factors associated with lateral pelvic recurrence after curative resection following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients

PURPOSE

This study aims to determine the risk factors for lateral pelvic recurrence (LPR) in rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and curative surgery.

METHODS

Four hundred forty-three patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT and curative surgery from October 1999 through June 2009 were analyzed. All patients underwent total mesorectal resection without lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) dissection. Recurrence patterns and lateral pelvic recurrence-free survival (LPFS) were evaluated relative to clinicopathologic parameters including pelvic LN status.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 52 months, with locoregional recurrence in 53 patients (11.9 %). Of the 53 patients, 28 (52.8 %) developed LPR, of which eight had both central and lateral PR. Multivariate analysis showed a significant relationship between LPFS and the number of lateral pelvic LN (p = 0.010) as well as the ratio of the number of positive LN/number of dissected LN (p = 0.038). The relationship between LPFS and LPLN size had a marginal trend (p = 0.085). Logistic regression analysis showed positive relationships between LPR probability and the number of LPLN (odds ratio [OR] 1.507; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.177-1.929; p = 0.001) as well as LPLN size (OR 1.124; CI 1.029-1.227, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

LPLN ≥ 2 and a ratio of the number of positive LN/number of dissected LN > 0.3 were prognostic of poor LPFS. The prediction curve of LPR according to the number and size of LPLN could be useful for determining the benefit of additional lateral pelvic treatment.

Neo-adjuvant radiotherapy in rectal cancer

In rectal cancer treatment, attention has focused on the local primary tumour and the regional tumour cell deposits to diminish the risk of a loco-regional recurrence. Several large randomized trials have also shown that combinations of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy have markedly reduced the risk of a loco-regional recurrence, but this has not yet had any major influence on overall survival. The best results have been achieved when the radiotherapy has been given preoperatively. Preoperative radiotherapy improves loco-regional control even when surgery has been optimized to improve lateral clearance, i.e., when a total mesorectal excision has been performed. The relative reduction is then 50%-70%. The value of radiotherapy has not been tested in combination with more extensive surgery including lateral lymph node clearance, as practised in some Asian countries. Many details about how the radiotherapy is performed are still open for discussion, and practice varies between countries. A highly fractionated radiation schedule (5 Gy × 5), proven efficacious in many trials, has gained much popularity in some countries, whereas a conventionally fractionated regimen (1.8-2.0 Gy × 25-28), often combined with chemotherapy, is used in other countries. The additional therapy adds morbidity to the morbidity that surgery causes, and should therefore be administered only when the risk of loco-regional recurrence is sufficiently high. The best integration of the weakest modality, to date the drugs (conventional cytotoxics and biologicals) is not known. A new generation of trials exploring the best sequence of treatments is required. Furthermore, there is a great need to develop predictors of response, so that treatment can be further individualized and not solely based upon clinical factors and anatomic imaging.

Lymphatic drainage of the rectum, preoperative assessment and its relevance to malignant polyp and rectal cancer management

SUMMARY The importance of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer is well recognized with regards to prognosis, staging and treatment. Accurate staging is particularly important where neoadjuvant treatment has been shown to downsize and downstage locally advanced tumors. Vascular invasion, poor differentiation and increasing depth of invasion are related to a higher risk of lymph node metastasis in early cancers while advanced, poorly differentiated and low rectal cancers are more likely to have lateral pelvic sidewall nodal involvement. Nodal staging is crucial in the management of malignant rectal polyps, as is the deferral of surgery in patients who have a complete clinical and radiological response to chemoradiotherapy. In all of these situations nodal staging is vital and warrants ongoing evaluation to improve its accuracy.

Initial clinical experience with robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer

Purpose

This study was conducted to evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of robotic extended lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLD) in patients with advanced low rectal cancer.

Methods

A review of a prospectively-collected database at Kyungpook National University Medical Center from January 2011 to November revealed a series of 8 consecutive robotic LPLD cases with a preoperative diagnosis of lateral node metastasis. Data regarding patient demographics, operating time, perioperative blood loss, surgical morbidity, lateral lymph node status, and functional outcome were analyzed.

Results

In all eight patients, the procedures were completed without conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time of extended pelvic node dissection was 38 minutes (range, 20 to 51 minutes), the mean number of lateral lymph nodes harvested was 4.1 (range, 1 to 13), and 3 patients (38%) were found to have lymph node metastases. Postoperative mortality and morbidity were 0% and 25%, respectively, but, there was no LPLD-related morbidity. The mean hospital stay was 7.5 days (range, 5 to 12 days).

Conclusion

Robotic LPLD is safe and feasible, with the advantage of being a minimally invasive approach. Further large-scale studies comparing robotic and conventional surgery with long-term follow-up evaluation are needed to confirm these findings.

Results of a Japanese nationwide multi-institutional study on lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in low rectal cancer: is it regional or distant disease?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LNs) in low rectal cancer are metastatic disease or part of regional LNs that are amenable to curative resection.

BACKGROUND

It is highly controversial whether lateral pelvic LNs should be considered as regional or distant disease, although the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) defines internal iliac LNs as regional LNs of rectal cancer.

METHODS

Data of patients with stage I to III low rectal cancer who underwent curative resection from 1978 to 1998 were extracted from the multi-institutional registry of large bowel cancer in Japan. Patients with only mesorectal LN metastasis were classified as the mesorectal-LN group. Patients with lateral pelvic LN metastasis localized to or extending beyond the internal iliac area were classified as the internal lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLN) group and external-LPLN group, respectively. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Lateral pelvic LN dissection was performed in 5789 (50%) of 11,567 patients. Overall, 3905 (34%), 411 (3.6%), and 244 (2.1%) patients were classified as the mesorectal-LN, internal-LPLN, and external-LPLN groups, respectively. When the mesorectal LN group was subdivided as defined by the AJCC, both 5-year OS and CSS were not significantly different between the N2a and internal-LPLN groups (OS: 45% vs 45%, P = 0.9585; CSS: 51% vs 49%, P = 0.5742), and the N2b and external-LPLN groups (OS: 32% vs 29%, P = 0.3342; CSS: 37% vs 34%, P = 0.4347). OS and CSS were significantly better in the external-LPLN group than in stage IV patients who underwent curative resection (OS: 29% vs 24%, P = 0.0240; CSS: 34% vs 27%, P = 0.0117).

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral pelvic LNs can be considered as regional LNs in low rectal cancer, although metastasis extending beyond the internal iliac area is associated with poorer survival.

Multidisciplinary treatment of patients with rectal cancer: Development during the past decades and plans for the future

In rectal cancer treatment, both the local primary and the regional and systemic tumour cell deposits must be taken care of in order to improve survival. The three main treatments, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, each with their own advantages and limitations, must then be combined to improve results. Several large randomized trials have shown that combinations of the modalities have markedly reduced the loco-regional recurrences, but have not yet had any major influence on overall survival. The best integration of the weakest modality, to date the drugs (conventional cytotoxics and biologicals), is not known. A new generation of trials exploring the best sequence of treatments is required. Furthermore, treatment of rectal cancer is administered to populations of individuals, based upon clinical factors and imaging, and can presently not be further individualized. There is an urgent need to develop response predictors.

The role of lateral lymph node dissection in the management of lower rectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Lateral lymph node involvement is a problem encountered in patients with low rectal cancers. This has been documented in both anatomical and pathological studies. Currently, the vast majority of centers have concentrated on the use of chemoradiation to obtain better local control and manage these nodes indirectly. In Japan, extended nodal dissection for the control of pelvic nodal disease has seen further advancement. This paper discusses the key issues involved in the management of pelvic lateral nodes in low rectal cancers.

METHODS

A review of available literature and critical appraisal of the entity of lateral nodes in low rectal cancers, the treatment options, and oncological and functional results were performed.

RESULTS

There are good data showing that the entity of pelvic lateral nodes in low rectal cancers should not be ignored. Recent data have emerged showing that radiotherapy is associated with significant long-term functional side effects. Refinement of the technique, lateral node dissection, has led to good local control as well as good functional outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In this context, there needs to be a reevaluation of the role of chemoradiation as the sole treatment for lateral nodal disease in centers outside of Japan. Individualization of the treatment of rectal cancer may require all centers to be able to offer both modalities.

EUS-FNA assessment of extramesenteric lymph node status in primary rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Preoperative staging is an essential factor in the multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer. The accuracy of imaging alone with CT, magnetic resonance imaging, or rigid endorectal US is poor. The addition of EUS-FNA may enhance extramesenteric lymph node metastases detection (M1 disease) and overall staging accuracy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the frequency of extramesenteric lymph node visualization by EUS and the rate of extramesenteric lymph node metastases by FNA. Secondary goals were to evaluate the clinical, endoscopic, and sonographic features associated with extramesenteric lymph node metastases, disease progression, and overall mortality.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

Tertiary referral center.

RESULTS

Forty-one of 316 patients (13%) with primary rectal cancer over a 6-year period had M1 disease by EUS-FNA. Significant clinical, endoscopic, and sonographic features associated with extramesenteric lymph node metastases included the serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, tumor length 4 cm and longer, annularity 50% or more, sessile morphology, and lymph node size. The sensitivity and specificity of CT for extramesenteric lymph node metastases were 44% and 89%, respectively. Twenty-three of 316 rectal cancer endosonographic procedures (7.3%) were up-staged by FNA, which established extramesenteric lymph node metastases. Over a 4-year follow-up, disease progression and overall mortality of patients with extramesenteric lymph node metastases was observed in 6 patients (14.6%) and 14 patients (34%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative EUS-FNA identification of extramesenteric lymph node metastases outside of standard radiation fields or total mesorectal excision resection margins could affect medical and surgical planning.

Relevance of magnetic resonance imaging-detected pelvic sidewall lymph node involvement in rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The significance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-suspected pelvic sidewall (PSW) lymph node involvement in rectal cancer is uncertain.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance images were reviewed retrospectively by specialist gastrointestinal radiologists for the presence of suspicious PSW nodes. Scans and outcome data were from patients with biopsy-proven rectal cancer and a minimum of 5 years' follow-up in the Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Rectal Cancer European Equivalence Study. Overall disease-free survival (DFS) was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method and stratified according to preoperative therapy. Binary logistic regression was used to match patients for propensity of clinical and staging characteristics, and further survival analysis was carried out to determine associations between suspicious PSW nodes on MRI and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 325 patients, 38 (11·7 per cent) had MRI-identified suspicious PSW nodes on baseline scans. Such nodes were associated with poor outcomes. Five-year DFS was 42 and 70·7 per cent respectively for patients with, and without suspicious PSW nodes (P < 0·001). Among patients undergoing primary surgery, MRI-suspected PSW node involvement was associated with worse 5-year DFS (31 versus 76·3 per cent; P = 0·001), but the presence of suspicious nodes had no impact on survival among patients who received preoperative therapy. After propensity matching for clinical and tumour characteristics, the presence of suspicious PSW nodes on MRI was not an independent prognostic variable.

CONCLUSION

Patients with suspicious PSW nodes on MRI had significantly worse DFS that appeared improved with the use of preoperative therapy. These nodes were associated with adverse features of the primary tumour and were not an independent prognostic factor.

Clinically enlarged lateral pelvic lymph nodes do not influence prognosis after neoadjuvant therapy and TME in stage III rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The significance of lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLN) in rectal cancer remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of patients with LPLNs identified on pretherapy imaging who were treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by proctectomy without LPLN dissection.

METHODS

Pretherapy imaging of patients with stage III rectal cancer was reviewed to determine perirectal and LPLN enlargement. Data were collected on preoperative therapy, operative resection, adjuvant therapy, and patient outcomes and were correlated to the presence or absence of preoperatively identified LPLNs (LPLN+ and LPLN-).

RESULTS

Of the 53 patients identified who were treated between 2000 and 2005, 30 (57%) were LPLN+ on preoperative imaging. All patients received preoperative radiation therapy and total mesorectal excision. The local recurrence was 13%, and there was no difference related to LPLN status. A comparison of the overall and disease-free survival in patients with and without enlarged LPLNs revealed no difference.

CONCLUSIONS

The LPLNs that were identified on pretherapy imaging do not affect the overall or disease-free survival after the neoadjuvant therapy and proctectomy in stage III rectal cancer. A lateral pelvic lymph node dissection does not appear to be justified in stage III patients with LPLNs on pretherapy imaging who receive neoadjuvant therapy.

One millimetre is the safe cut-off for magnetic resonance imaging prediction of surgical margin status in rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

A pathologically involved margin in rectal cancer is defined as tumour within 1 mm of the surgical resection margin. There is no standard definition of a predicted safe margin on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of this study was to assess which cut-off (1, 2 or 5 mm) was the best predictor of local recurrence based on preoperative MRI assessment of the circumferential resection margin (CRM).

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively on the distance between the tumour and mesorectal fascia for patients with documented radiological margin status in the MERCURY study. Positive margin and local recurrence rates were compared for MRI distances from the tumour to the mesorectal fascia of 1 mm or less, more than 1 mm up to 2 mm, more than 2 mm up to 5 mm, and more than 5 mm. The Cox proportional hazard regression method was used to determine the effect of level of margin involvement on time to local recurrence.

RESULTS

Univariable analysis showed that, relative to a distance measured by MRI of more than 5 mm, the hazard ratio (HR) for local recurrence was 3·90 (95 per cent confidence interval 1·99 to 7·63; P < 0·001) for a margin of 1 mm or less, 0·81 (0·36 to 1·85; P = 0·620) for a margin of more than 1 mm up to 2 mm, and 0·33 (0·10 to 1·08; P = 0·067) for a margin greater than 2 mm up to 5 mm. Multivariable analysis of the effect of MRI distance to the mesorectal fascia and preoperative treatment on local recurrence showed that a margin of 1 mm or less remained significant regardless of preoperative treatment (HR 3·72, 1·43 to 9·71; P = 0·007).

CONCLUSION

For preoperative staging of rectal cancer, the best cut-off distance for predicting CRM involvement using MRI is 1 mm. Using a cut-off greater than this does not appear to identify patients at higher risk of local recurrence.

Patterns of local recurrence in rectal cancer after a multidisciplinary approach

Improvements in surgery and the application of combined approaches to fight rectal cancer have succeeded in reducing the local recurrence (LR) rate and when there is LR it tends to appear later and less often in isolation. Moreover, a subtle change in the distribution of LRs with respect to the pelvis has been observed. In general terms, prior to total mesorectal excision the most common LRs were central types (perianastomotic and anterior) while lateral and posterior forms (presacral) have become more common since the growth in the use of combined treatments. No differences have been reported in the current pattern of LRs as a function of the type of approach used, that is, neo-adjuvant therapies (short-term or long-course radiotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy versus extended lymphadenectomy, though there is a trend towards posterior or presacral LR in patients in the Western world and lateral LR in Asia. Nevertheless, both may arise from the same mechanism. Moreover, as well as the mode of treatment, the type of LR is related to the height of the initial tumor. Nowadays most LRs are related to the advanced nature of the disease. Involvement of the circumferential radial margin and spillage of residual tumor cells from lymphatic leakage in the pelvic side wall are two plausible mechanisms for the genesis of LR. The patterns of pelvic recurrence itself (pelvic subsites) also have important implications for prognosis and are related to the potential success of salvage curative approach. The re-operability for cure and prognosis are generally better for anastomotic and anterior types than for presacral and lateral recurrences. Overall survival after LR diagnosis is lower with radio or chemoradiotherapy plus optimal surgery approaches, compared to optimal surgery alone.

Severe tumor budding is a risk factor for lateral lymph node metastasis in early rectal cancers

BACKGROUND

Lateral lymph node (LLN) metastasis sometimes occurs in patients with early rectal cancer that has invaded the submucosa (SM) and muscularis propria (MP). This study aims to identify the risk factor(s) for LLN metastasis in such patients.

METHOD

We retrospectively analyzed 65 patients with pathological SM or MP lower rectal adenocarcinoma, for whom radical resection had been performed at a single institution.

RESULTS

We performed LLN dissection in 52 (80%) patients. The LLN dissection rates in the case of pathological SM and MP tumors were 65.6% and 94.4%, respectively, and the corresponding LLN metastasis rates were 6.9% and 11.1%. Severe tumor budding was found to be a risk factor for LLN metastasis (P = 0.002). Further, of six patients with LLN metastasis, four did not have coincident mesenteric lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSION

In rectal cancer that has pathologically invaded SM and MP, LLN metastasis is not negligible. LLN dissection could lower the local recurrence rate of SM and MP rectal cancer. In case LLN dissection is not performed, patients with a high tumor budding grade should be administered adjuvant therapy.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in rectal cancer: a comprehensive review

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has established itself as the primary method for local staging in patients with rectal cancer. This is due to several factors, most importantly because of the ability to assess the status of circumferential resection margin. There are several newer developments being introduced continuously, such as diffusion-weighted imaging and imaging with 3 T. Assessment of loco-regional lymph nodes has also been investigated extensively using different approaches, but more work needs to be done. Finally, evaluation of tumours during or after preoperative treatment is becoming an everyday reality. All these new aspects prompt a review of the most recent advances and opinions. In this review, a comprehensive overview of the current status of MRI in the loco-regional assessment and management of rectal cancer is presented. The findings on MRI and their accuracy are reviewed based on the most up-to-date evidence. Optimisation of MRI acquisition and relevant regional anatomy are also presented, based on published literature and our own experience.

Technical feasibility of laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for patients with low rectal cancer after concurrent chemoradiation therapy

AIM

To test the technical feasibility of laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for patients with clinically positive lateral node(s) after preoperative concurrent chemoradiation therapy for lower rectal cancer.

METHODS

The operation procedures are detailed in the attached video.

RESULTS

Forty-five procedures of laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy were performed in 34 patients, with dissection over bilateral lateral node foci in 11 patients and dissection over unilateral lateral node station in 23. There were four procedures in which the metastatic node was very close to or even encased the adjacent iliac vessel and therefore the lymphadenectomy was done with a surgical margin of less than 1 mm. The median (range) number of lymph nodes harvested in each lateral station was 6 (2-14). Lympho-adipose tissues from 32 (71.1%, 32/45) lateral node dissections were confirmed by histopathology to harbor metastatic adenocarcinoma. For unilateral lateral pelvic lymph node dissection, median (range) blood loss was 44 (20-240) ml and median (range) operation time was 58 (42-94) min. There was one (2.9%) operative mortality and seven (20.6%) postoperative complications. Postoperatively, most patients presented with mild postoperative pain and quick convalescence. During follow-up (mean 24 months), nine patients (27.3%) developed recurrent disease. Remarkably, all four patients with surgical margin less than 1 mm developed cancer recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy is technically feasible for some selected patients. To date, laparoscopic approach is still underdeveloped to treat the complex clinical condition in which the metastatic node involves the iliac vessel and combined resection of the vessel is required to obtain sufficient margin.

Improving prediction of lateral node spread in low rectal cancers--multivariate analysis of clinicopathological factors in 1,046 cases

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to search for independent predictors of lateral node metastasis in low rectal cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 1,046 patients who underwent curative resection for lower rectal cancer in our prospectively collected database. All lymph nodes were dissected from the fresh specimen, and their locations were documented prospectively according to the classification by the Japanese Society of Cancer of the Colon and Rectum.

RESULTS

More than 35% of the patients had demonstrated upward nodal metastasis in the direction of the inferior mesenteric vessels, while 11% demonstrated lateral node metastasis, which was present in 17.3% of patients with T3 and T4 lesions. Multivariate analysis revealed five factors to be statistically significant independent predictors of lateral node metastasis: female sex, tumors that were not well differentiated, pathological T3 and above, positive microscopic lymphatic invasion, and positive mesorectal nodes. Using the variables sex, differentiation, T stage, and mesorectal nodes as risk factors, because these could be elucidated preoperatively, the presence of lateral node metastasis was then analyzed according to the number of positive risk factors. When there were fewer than three positive factors, the risk of lateral nodal spread was low (4.5%). When three or more risk factors were positive, the odds of lateral node metastasis were more than 7.5 times higher (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study provide a scoring system that can be used to guide the clinician to the presence of lateral node metastasis in low rectal cancers.

Retroperitoneal and lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy mapped by lymphoscintigraphy for rectal adenocarcinoma staging

BACKGROUND

The good prognosis of retroperitoneal and lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy has raised the question of whether total mesorectal excision is suitable for adequate staging of rectal adenocarcinoma patients. The aims of this study were to determine the accuracy of dye and probe detection of metastatic retroperitoneal and/or lateral pelvic nodes and to define the upstaging impact of retroperitoneal and lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy in rectal adenocarcinoma patients.

METHODS

Ninety-seven rectal adenocarcinoma patients were submitted to total mesorectal excision and retroperitoneal and lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. Lymphoscintigraphy using technetium-99 m-phytate and patent blue was performed to detect blue and/or radioactive retroperitoneal and/or lateral pelvic nodes which were examined histopathologically and immunohistochemically with a step-sectioning technique.

RESULTS

Mesorectal mean node count was 11.5 and retroperitoneal and/or lateral pelvic node was 11.7. Retroperitoneal and lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy identified metastases in 17.5%, upstaging 8.2%. Variables related to metastatic retroperitoneal and/or lateral pelvic nodes were the following: Stage III in total mesorectal excision specimens (P < 0.04), pT3/pT4 tumors (P = 0.047), high levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (P = 0.014) and large tumors (P = 0.03). Marker migration to retroperitoneal and/or lateral pelvic nodes occurred in 37.1%, upstaging 11.1%. The markers' accuracy in the detection of metastatic retroperitoneal and/or lateral pelvic nodes was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Retroperitoneal and lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy detected an important rate of metastatic retroperitoneal and/or lateral pelvic nodes (RLPN), resulting in upstaging. When markers migrated, they were able to detect RLPN metastases. The use of markers should be improved in the identification of RLPN metastases for selective indication of retroperitoneal and lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Extended lymphadenectomy versus conventional surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lateral pelvic lymph-node metastases occur in 10-25% of patients with rectal cancer, and are associated with higher local recurrence and reduced survival rates. A meta-analysis was undertaken to assess the value of extended lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy in the operative management of rectal cancer.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for studies published between 1965 and 2009 that compared extended lymphadenectomy (EL) with standard rectal resection. 20 studies, which included 5502 patients from one randomised, three prospective non-randomised, and 14 retrospective case-control studies published between 1984 and 2009, met our search criteria and were assessed. 2577 patients underwent EL and 2925 underwent non-EL for rectal cancer. Random and fixed-effects meta-analytical models were used where indicated, and between-study heterogeneity was assessed. End-points evaluated included peri-operative outcomes, 5-year survival and recurrence rates.

FINDINGS

Operating time was significantly longer in the EL group by 76.7 min (95% CI 18.77-134.68; p=0.0096). Intra-operative blood loss was greater in the EL group by 536.5 mL (95% CI 353.7-719.2; p<0.0001). Peri-operative mortality (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.34-1.93; p=0.63) and morbidity (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.89-2.35; p=0.13) were similar between the two groups. Data from individual studies showed that male sexual dysfunction and urinary dysfunction (three studies: OR 3.70, 95% CI 1.66-8.23; p=0.0012) were more prevalent in the EL group. There were no significant differences in 5-year survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.09, 95% CI 0.78-1.50; p=0.62), 5-year disease-free survival (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.75-2.03, p=0.41), and local (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.61-1.13; p=0.23) or distant recurrence (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.72-1.21; p=0.60).

INTERPRETATION

Extended lymphadenectomy does not seem to confer a significant overall cancer-specific advantage, but does seem to be associated with increased urinary and sexual dysfunction.

Future directions in neoadjuvant therapy of rectal cancer: maximizing pathological complete response rates

Neoadjuvant therapy is widely accepted as the current standard of care for localized rectal cancer. Downstaging of disease has been significantly improved and pathological complete response rates (pCR) which were historically below 10% with preoperative radiation alone, now range from 15% to 30% with preoperative chemo-radiation. While the availability of new chemotherapeutic drugs (Irinotecan, Oxaliplatin, etc.) and molecular targeted agents (Bevacizamab, Cetuximab, etc.) hold a great deal of promise, results of recent studies indicate that the pCR rate with neoadjuvant therapy appears to have plateaued at 20-30%. The use of more intensive multidrug combinations has, however, significantly increased the toxicity of treatment. New paradigms in neoadjuvant therapy are therefore needed to further improve results of treatment. This review presents strategies for neoadjuvant therapy, with the potential to improve pCR rates and also survival of patients.

Understanding the anatomy of lymphatic drainage and the use of blue-dye mapping to determine the extent of lymphadenectomy in rectal cancer surgery: unresolved issues

OBJECTIVE

This paper reviews the literature on the pathways of lymphatic drainage of the rectum and their significance in radical cancer surgery.

METHOD

This paper reviews some of the seminal works on the lymphatic drainage of the rectum and its surgical implications when operating on patients with rectal cancer. Publications were searched via Medline, sourced from reference lists and by cross referencing with the most widely cited papers.

RESULTS

The classical European description of the anatomy of the lymphatic drainage of the rectum is presented. Early lymphatic mapping techniques and the role of newer technologies in lymphatic mapping, including sentinel lymph node mapping are discussed. The differing philosophies between Western practice, of dissection in the plane of the fascia propria and the Japanese wider pelvic lymphadenectomy are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

A clear understanding of the regional lymphatic drainage of the rectum and precise anatomical mobilisation of the rectum is the surgical cornerstone to excellent locoregional control of rectal cancer. The success of the differing Western and Japanese philosophies on the degree of pelvic lymphadenectomy suggests a possible role for 'selective wide pelvic lymphadectomy'. Mapping lateral lymphatic drainage pathways could augment the selection process for radiotherapy.