Impact and optimal timing of local therapy addition in borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer after FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy

Background

To evaluate the efficacy and optimal timing of local treatment in patients with borderline resectable (BR) or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) treated with upfront FOLFIRINOX.

Method

Between 2015 and 2020, 258 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) were analysed. Treatment outcomes were compared between systemic treatment group (ST) and multimodality treatment groups (MT) using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. The MT were stratified as follows: FOLFIRINOX + radiation therapy (RT) (MT1), FOLFIRINOX + surgical resection (MT2), and FOLFIRINOX + RT + surgical resection (MT3).

Results

With median follow-up period of 18 months, the 2-year overall survival (OS) for the ST was 22.0%, and it was significantly worse than MT (MT1, 46.3%; MT2, 65.7% and MT3; 90.2%; P < .001). The 2-year locoregional progression free survival (LRPFS) and overall PFS in ST were 10.7% and 7.0%, which were also significantly lower than those of MT (2-year LRPFS: MT1, 31.8%; MT2, 45.3%; MT3, 81.0%; 2-year overall PFS: MT1, 23.3%; MT2, 35.0%; MT3, 66.3%; P < .001). In time-varying multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, local treatment contributed to better treatment outcomes, with adjusted hazard ratios of 0.568 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.398-0.811), 0.490 (95% CI, 0.331-0.726), and 0.656 (95% CI, 0.458-0.940) for OS, LRPFS, and overall PFS, respectively. The time window of 11-17 months after FOLFIRINOX appeared to demonstrate the maximal efficacy of local treatments in OS.

Conclusions

Adding local treatment in BR/LAPC patients treated with upfront FOLFIRINOX seemed to contribute in improved treatment outcomes, and it showed maximal efficacy in OS when applied 11-17 months after the initiation of FOLFIRINOX. We suggest that administration of sufficient period of upfront FOLFIRINOX may intensify the efficacy of local treatments, and well controlled prospective trials are expected.

Prevalence of RAF1 Aberrations in Metastatic Cancer Patients: Real-World Data

PURPOSE

Therapeutic targeting of RAF1 is a promising cancer treatment, but the relationship between clinical features and RAF1 aberrations in terms of the MAPK signaling pathway is poorly understood in various solid tumors.

METHODS

Between October 2019 and June 2023 at Samsung Medical Center, 3895 patients with metastatic solid cancers underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) using TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500) assays as routine clinical practice. We surveyed the incidence of RAF1 aberrations including mutations (single-nucleotide variants [SNVs]), amplifications (copy number variation), and fusions.

RESULTS

Among the 3895 metastatic cancer patients, 77 (2.0%) exhibited RAF1 aberrations. Of these 77 patients, 44 (1.1%) had RAF1 mutations (SNV), 25 (0.6%) had RAF1 amplifications, and 10 (0.3%) had RAF1 fusions. Among the 10 patients with RAF1 fusions, concurrent RAF1 amplifications and RAF1 mutations were detected in one patient each. The most common tumor types were bladder cancer (11.5%), followed by ampulla of Vater (AoV) cancer (5.3%), melanoma (3.0%), gallbladder (GB) cancer (2.6%), and gastric (2.3%) cancer. Microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) tumors were observed in five of 76 patients (6.6%) with RAF1 aberrations, while MSI-H tumors were found in only 2.1% of patients with wild-type RAF1 cancers (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that approximately 2.0% of patients with metastatic solid cancers have RAF1 aberrations according to NGS of tumor specimens.

Patient-derived exosomes facilitate therapeutic targeting of oncogenic MET in advanced gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) with peritoneal metastases and malignant ascites continues to have poor prognosis. Exosomes mediate intercellular communication during cancer progression and promote therapeutic resistance. Here, we report the significance of exosomes derived from malignant ascites (EXOAscites) in cancer progression and use modified exosomes as resources for cancer therapy. EXOAscites from patients with GC stimulated invasiveness and angiogenesis in an ex vivo three-dimensional autologous tumor spheroid microfluidic system. EXOAscites concentration increased invasiveness, and blockade of their secretion suppressed tumor progression. In MET-amplified GC, EXOAscites contain abundant MET; their selective delivery to tumor cells enhanced angiogenesis and invasiveness. Exosomal MET depletion substantially reduced invasiveness; an additive therapeutic effect was induced when combined with MET and/or VEGFR2 inhibition in a patient-derived MET-amplified GC model. Allogeneic MET-harboring exosome delivery induced invasion and angiogenesis in a MET non-amplified GC model. MET-amplified patient tissues showed higher exosome concentration than their adjacent normal tissues. Manipulating exosome content and production may be a promising complementary strategy against GC.

Smoking Cessation and Pancreatic Cancer Risk in Individuals With Prediabetes and Diabetes: A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Individuals with diabetes and prediabetes are at increased risk of pancreatic cancer. However, little is known about the effects of smoking or smoking cessation on pancreatic cancer risk in individuals with diabetes and prediabetes. We investigated the association between smoking status (particularly smoking cessation) and pancreatic cancer risk according to glycemic status.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This nationwide cohort study included 9,520,629 adults without cancer who underwent the Korean National Health Screening in 2009 and were followed until 2018. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for pancreatic cancer were estimated after adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

During the 78.4 million person-years of follow-up, 15,245 patients were newly diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Among individuals with diabetes and prediabetes, current smoking synergistically increased pancreatic cancer risk (all P<.01). However, quitters with diabetes and prediabetes had a pancreatic cancer risk comparable to that of never-smokers (all P>.05). For pancreatic cancer in current smokers, quitters, and never-smokers, respectively, the hazard ratios were 1.48 (95% CI, 1.40-1.58), 1.11 (95% CI, 1.03-1.19), and 1.00 (reference) among individuals with normoglycemia; 1.83 (95% CI, 1.70-1.97), 1.28 (95% CI, 1.18-1.39), and 1.20 (95% CI, 1.14-1.26) among individuals with prediabetes; and 2.72 (95% CI, 2.52-2.94), 1.78 (95% CI, 1.63-1.95), and 1.63 (95% CI, 1.54-1.72) among individuals with diabetes. There were no differences in risk between quitters with a <20 pack-year smoking history and never-smokers in all glycemic status groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic cancer risk synergistically increased in current smokers with diabetes and prediabetes. However, smoking cessation reduced the synergistically increased risk of pancreatic cancer to the level of never-smokers, especially when smoking history was <20 pack-years. More individualized and intensive cancer prevention education should be underscored for individuals at an increased risk of pancreatic cancer beyond the one-size-fits-all approach.

Pemetrexed and Erlotinib as a Salvage Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer Who Failed Gemcitabine-containing Chemotherapy: A Phase II Single-arm Prospective Study

BACKGROUND/AIM

No standard treatment is currently recommended for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) after first-line therapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a pemetrexed and erlotinib combination in patients with BTC previously treated with gemcitabine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase II, open-label, single-arm study enrolled patients with BTC who had previously failed gemcitabine-based first-line chemotherapy. Patients were treated with pemetrexed as a 500 mg/m2 intravenous infusion on day 1 for three weeks and erlotinib 100 mg daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

The study enrolled 20 patients with BTC, including 12 (60%) with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC), 3 (15%) with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC), and 5 (25%) with gallbladder cancer (GBC). The ORR was 5%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 55%. As of the cutoff point of March 31, 2023, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI)=0.00-4.74] and the median overall survival (OS) was 5.6 months (95%CI=2.28-8.87). Patients with EHCC showed longer PFS and OS compared to patients with IHCC or GBC, but the differences were not significant. A baseline CEA greater than the upper normal limit was the only significant prognostic factor for a worse OS rate. The only treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) with severity grade ≥3 was anemia (5%).

CONCLUSION

Salvage chemotherapy with pemetrexed plus erlotinib was well-tolerated and showed marginal clinical activity in BTC patients after failure to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

Clinical Implication of HER2 Aberration in Patients With Metastatic Cancer Using Next-Generation Sequencing: A Pan-Tumor Analysis

PURPOSE

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein expression or gene amplification is a significant predictive biomarker for identifying patients with cancer, who may benefit from HER2-targeted therapy. The aim of this study was to survey the proportion of patients who had HER2 aberration and to investigate the correlation between HER2 amplification and HER2 overexpression in immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a real-world data.

METHODS

We surveyed the incidence of HER2 aberration including mutation (single-nucleotide variant [SNV]), amplification (copy-number variation), and fusion by next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 2,119 patients with cancer from Samsung Medical Center in South Korea.

RESULTS

Of 2,119 patients with cancer, 189 patients (8.9%) had HER2 aberration in their tumor specimen. Of 189 patients, 113 (5.3%) patients had HER2 amplification, 82 (3.9%) patients had HER2 mutations, and 11 (0.5%) patients had HER2 fusion. Of note, 10 patients (0.5%) had concurrent HER2 amplification and HER2 fusion. In addition, we identified that HER2 protein overexpression was strongly related to HER2 amplification by NGS. Of 74 patients with HER2 amplification only by NGS test, 64 patients (86.5%) had HER2 overexpression by IHC. Of 10 patients with concurrent HER2 amplification and fusion, 80% patients were HER2 overexpression. Among 51 patients with only HER2 mutation (SNV), 9 patients (17.6%) were HER2 (+). Interestingly, almost all patients with colorectal cancer (11 of 12) with HER2 amplification had very strong HER2 overexpression (3+) in their tumor specimen.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we showed that when patients with metastatic cancer receive NGS test, approximately 8.9% have HER2 aberrations in their tumor specimen. Most patients have HER2 amplification, and a small percentage of patients have HER2 fusion. A great majority of patients with HER2 amplification and/or HER2 fusion had HER2 (+) tumor by IHC.

Pembrolizumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (KEYNOTE-966): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract cancers, which arise from the intrahepatic or extrahepatic bile ducts and the gallbladder, generally have a poor prognosis and are rising in incidence worldwide. The standard-of-care treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer is chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin. Because most biliary tract cancers have an immune-suppressed microenvironment, immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy is associated with a low objective response rate. We aimed to assess whether adding the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab to gemcitabine and cisplatin would improve outcomes compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

METHODS

KEYNOTE-966 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done at 175 medical centres globally. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older; had previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer; had disease measurable per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1; and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo, both administered intravenously every 3 weeks (maximum 35 cycles), in combination with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks; no maximum duration) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks; maximum 8 cycles). Randomisation was done using a central interactive voice-response system and stratified by geographical region, disease stage, and site of origin in block sizes of four. The primary endpoint of overall survival was evaluated in the intention-to-treat population. The secondary endpoint of safety was evaluated in the as-treated population. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04003636.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 4, 2019, and June 8, 2021, 1564 patients were screened for eligibility, 1069 of whom were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (pembrolizumab group; n=533) or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (placebo group; n=536). Median study follow-up at final analysis was 25·6 months (IQR 21·7-30·4). Median overall survival was 12·7 months (95% CI 11·5-13·6) in the pembrolizumab group versus 10·9 months (9·9-11·6) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·83 [95% CI 0·72-0·95]; one-sided p=0·0034 [significance threshold, p=0·0200]). In the as-treated population, the maximum adverse event grade was 3 to 4 in 420 (79%) of 529 participants in the pembrolizumab group and 400 (75%) of 534 in the placebo group; 369 (70%) participants in the pembrolizumab group and 367 (69%) in the placebo group had treatment-related adverse events with a maximum grade of 3 to 4. 31 (6%) participants in the pembrolizumab group and 49 (9%) in the placebo group died due to adverse events, including eight (2%) in the pembrolizumab group and three (1%) in the placebo group who died due to treatment-related adverse events.

INTERPRETATION

Based on a statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin without any new safety signals, pembrolizumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin could be a new treatment option for patients with previously untreated metastatic or unresectable biliary tract cancer.

FUNDING

Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA.

Increased Risk of Young-Onset Digestive Tract Cancers Among Young Adults Age 20-39 Years With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Although the incidence of young-onset digestive tract cancers is increasing worldwide, their risk factors remain largely unknown. We investigated the association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and young-onset digestive tract cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This nationwide cohort study included 5,265,590 individuals age 20-39 years who underwent national health screening under the Korean National Health Insurance Service between 2009 and 2012. The fatty liver index was used as a diagnostic biomarker for NAFLD. The participants were followed up until December 2018 to determine the incidence of young-onset digestive tract cancers (ie, esophageal, stomach, colorectal, liver, pancreatic, biliary tract, and gallbladder). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were conducted to estimate the risk after adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

During the 38.8 million person-years of follow-up, 14,565 patients were newly diagnosed with young-onset digestive tract cancers. The cumulative incidence probability of each cancer type was consistently higher in individuals with NAFLD than in those without NAFLD (all log-rank P < .05). NAFLD was associated with an increased risk of overall digestive tract (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.22), stomach (aHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.24), colorectal (aHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.22), liver (aHR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.52), pancreatic (aHR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.40), biliary tract (aHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.66), and gallbladder (aHR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.31) cancer. These associations remained significant regardless of age, sex, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and obesity status (all P < .05; P for interaction >.05). The aHR for esophageal cancer was 1.67 (95% CI, 0.92 to 3.03).

CONCLUSION

NAFLD may be an independent, modifiable risk factor for young-onset digestive tract cancers. Our findings suggest a crucial opportunity to reduce premature morbidity and mortality associated with young-onset digestive tract cancers in the next generation.

Silmitasertib plus gemcitabine and cisplatin first-line therapy in locally advanced/metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: A Phase 1b/2 study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This study aimed to investigate safety and efficacy of silmitasertib, an oral small molecule casein kinase 2 inhibitor, plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (G+C) versus G+C in locally advanced/metastatic cholangiocarcinoma.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

This work is a Phase 1b/2 study (S4-13-001). In Phase 2, patients received silmitasertib 1000 mg twice daily for 10 days with G+C on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in the modified intent-to-treat population (defined as patients who completed at least one cycle of silmitasertib without dose interruption/reduction) from both phases (silmitasertib/G+C n = 55, G+C n = 29). The response was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. The median PFS was 11.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.6, 14.7) versus 5.8 months (95% CI, 3.1, not evaluable [NE]) ( p  = 0.0496); 10-month PFS was 56.1% (95% CI, 38.8%, 70.2%) versus 22.2% (95% CI, 1.8%, 56.7%); and median overall survival was 17.4 months (95% CI, 13.4, 25.7) versus 14.9 months (95% CI, 9.9, NE) with silmitasertib/G+C versus G+C. Overall response rate was 34.0% versus 30.8%; the disease control rate was 86.0% versus 88.5% with silmitasertib/G+C versus G+C. Almost all silmitasertib/G+C (99%) and G+C (93%) patients reported at least one treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE). The most common TEAEs (all grades) with silmitasertib/G+C versus G+C were diarrhea (70% versus 13%), nausea (59% vs. 30%), fatigue (47% vs. 47%), vomiting (39% vs. 7%), and anemia (39% vs. 30%). Twelve patients (10%) discontinued treatment because of TEAEs during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Silmitasertib/G+C demonstrated promising preliminary evidence of efficacy for the first-line treatment of patients with locally advanced/metastatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Combination treatment of T1-44, a PRMT5 inhibitor with Vactosertib, an inhibitor of TGF-β signaling, inhibits invasion and prolongs survival in a mouse model of pancreatic tumors

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most lethal type of cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death with the lowest 5-year survival rate. Heterogeneity, difficulty in diagnosis, and rapid metastatic progression are the causes of high mortality in pancreatic cancer. Recent studies have shown that Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) is overexpressed in pancreatic cancers, and these patients have a worse prognosis. Recently, PRMT5 as an anti-cancer target has gained considerable interest. In this study, we investigated whether inhibition of PRMT5 activity was synergistic with blockade of TGF-β1 signaling, which plays an important role in the construction of the desmoplastic matrix in pancreatic cancer and induces therapeutic vulnerability. Compared with T1-44, a selective inhibitor of PRMT5 activity, the combination of T1-44 with the TGF-β1 signaling inhibitor Vactosertib significantly reduced tumor size and surrounding tissue invasion and significantly improved long-term survival. RNA sequencing analysis of mouse tumors revealed that the combination of T1-44 and Vactosertib significantly altered the expression of genes involved in cancer progression, such as cell migration, extracellular matrix, and apoptotic processes. In particular, the expression of Btg2, known as a tumor suppressor factor in various cancers, was markedly induced by combination treatment. Ectopic overexpression of Btg2 inhibited the EMT response, blocking cell migration, and promoted cancer cell death. These data demonstrate that the combination therapy of T1-44 with Vactosertib is synergistic for pancreatic cancer, suggesting that this novel combination therapy has value in the treatment strategy of patients with pancreatic cancer.

IMbrave151: A phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of atezolizumab with or without bevacizumab in combination with cisplatin plus gemcitabine in patients with untreated, advanced biliary tract cancer

491

Background: VEGF blockade coupled with cytotoxic chemotherapy can promote an immune-permissive tumor microenvironment that can augment response to PD-L1 inhibition. IMbrave151 (NCT04677504) is a randomized, double-blind, global Phase II study evaluating the efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo), bevacizumab (bev) and cisplatin and gemcitabine (CisGem) as first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC). Methods: Patients with previously untreated aBTC were randomized 1:1 to receive atezo (1200 mg every 3 weeks [q3w]) + bev (15 mg/kg q3w) or placebo + CisGem (cisplatin 25 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8 q3w) for up to 8 cycles, followed by atezo (1200 mg q3w) + bev (15 mg/kg q3w) or placebo until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were stratified by disease status, geographic region and primary tumor location. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), disease control rate and safety. No formal hypothesis testing was performed. Results: In total, 162 patients were randomized to receive either atezo + bev + CisGem (n=79) or atezo + placebo + CisGem (n=83). Median age 63 years, Asia/Rest of World (43/57%), ECOG PS 0/1 (53/48%), intrahepatic/extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder (54/19/27%), and metastatic/locally advanced stage (82/18%). The HR for PFS was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.51, 1.14). Median PFS was 8.4 months for atezo + bev + CisGem and 7.9 months for atezo + placebo + CisGem; the 6-month PFS rates were 78% and 63%, respectively. The confirmed ORR was 24% for atezo + bev + CisGem and 25% for atezo + placebo + CisGem. DOR ≥6 months was 89% for atezo + bev + CisGem vs 47% for atezo + placebo + CisGem. The incidence of Grade 3 or 4 adverse events was 73% and 74% with atezo + bev + CisGem and atezo + placebo + CisGem, respectively. Median OS is not reached. Conclusions: Both combinations of IMbrave151 showed a manageable safety profile. The aggregate of data suggests that combining atezo with bev and chemotherapy may provide clinical benefit in a subset of patients with aBTC. Follow-up is ongoing for OS. Clinical trial information: NCT04677504 .

CTX-009 (ABL001), a bispecific antibody targeting DLL4 and VEGF A, in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC): A phase 2 study

540

Background: CTX-009 is a novel bispecific antibody that simultaneously inhibits Delta-like ligand 4/Notch-1 (DLL4) and VEGF A, two signaling molecules which play an important role in angiogenesis in the tumor microenvironment. DLL4 is induced by VEGF and acts to the downstream of VEGF, and synergistic effect for dual blockade of both DLL4 and VEGF was evaluated in preclinical models. A phase 1b study assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of CTX-009 in combination with paclitaxel or irinotecan in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Encouraging results in the Phase 1b in BTC pts, including two durable Partial Responses (PRs) out of 3 pts, prompted the expansion of the study to include a Phase 2 cohort in which BTC pts are treated in 2L or 3L setting. We present preliminary results from this Phase 2 study. Methods: This open-label, multi-center, single-arm Phase 2 study investigated pts with unresectable advanced, metastatic or recurrent BTC in advanced 2L or 3L setting. Eligible pts were treated with CTX-009 (10 mg/kg IV biweekly) in combination with paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 IV on Day 1, 8, 15 q4-weekly). The primary objective was to assess the objective response rate (ORR) based on RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included time to treatment failure (TTF), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Overall, 24 pts have been enrolled (IHCC: 9, EHCC: 3, GB: 7, AoV: 5) and as of the data cut-off date (August 12, 2022), the median follow-up duration was 11.8 months (m) (range: 1.6-16.4) and 3 pts remained on treatment. 11 pts were treated in 2L and 13 pts treated in 3L. There were 9 confirmed PRs by investigator’s assessment and ORR was 37.5% (95% CI: 18.8-59.4; 2L: 63.6%, 3L: 15.4%). Median DOR and PFS were 9.4 m (95% CI: 3.5–NE) and 9.4 m (95% CI: 5.4-11.1), respectively. Median TTF was 5.9 m (95% CI: 3.9-9.8) and median OS has not been reached (95% CI: 11.0–NE); the OS rate at 12 m was 53.0% (95% CI: 29.8–71.7). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade were reported in 100% of pts and TRAEs of ≥ grade 3 were reported in 75% of pts (including one grade 5 pneumonia). The most frequent TRAEs of ≥ grade 3 were neutropenia (50.0%), hypertension (16.7%), anemia (12.5%), and thrombocytopenia (8.3%). Six pts (25.0%) experienced treatment-emergent AEs (confusional state, pulmonary embolism, blood creatinine increased, pneumonia, biliary fistula, and large intestine perforation) that led to discontinuation of the study treatment. Conclusions: This Phase 2 study has shown promising efficacy in BTC pts treated in 2L or 3L setting. TRAE rate based on mode of action was high, but DLL4/VEGF targeting in BTC has a potential of development. Further investigation of safety and efficacy of this regimen is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT04492033 .

Characterization of long-term survivors in the TOPAZ-1 study of durvalumab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer

531

Background: At the primary analysis of TOPAZ-1 (NCT03875235; data cut-off [DCO] Aug 11, 2021), durvalumab (D) + gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) significantly improved overall survival (OS) vs placebo (PBO) + GC in participants (pts) with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), with OS curves that separated over time (Oh et al. NEJM Evid 2022), that persisted with further follow-up (DCO Feb 25, 2022; HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.64–0.91]; 18-month OS, 34.8% [D + GC] vs 24.1% [PBO + GC]; Oh et al. Ann Oncol 2022 Abs 56P). We characterized long-term survivors (LTS) in TOPAZ-1. Methods: Pts untreated for unresectable locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic BTC received D (1500 mg every 3 weeks [Q3W]) or PBO, + G (1000 mg/m2) and C (25 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 Q3W, up to 8 cycles, followed by D (1500 mg Q4W) or PBO. Characteristics and outcomes of LTS (pts who survived ≥18 months after randomization; DCO Feb 25, 2022) were assessed. Results: There were more LTS with D + GC vs PBO + GC (Table). Characteristics of LTS were consistent with the full analysis set (FAS, all randomized pts) including age, sex, region, primary tumor location, disease classification (metastatic vs locally advanced) and PD-L1 expression. Recurrent disease was more common than initially unresectable disease in LTS vs FAS. Median exposure to study treatment was 11.3 months (mo; D), 9.7 mo (PBO) and 5.5 mo (GC, both arms) in LTS and 7.3 mo (D), 5.8 mo (PBO) and 5.1 mo (GC, both arms) in FAS. The objective response rate in LTS was greater with D + GC vs PBO + GC (44.3%, D + GC; 33.8%, PBO + GC), and greater for both groups vs FAS (26.7%, D + GC; 18.7%, PBO + GC). A higher proportion of LTS in the PBO + GC group received subsequent anticancer therapy, including immunotherapy, than LTS in the D + GC group. The frequency of treatment-related adverse events leading to discontinuation in LTS was consistent with FAS. Conclusions: In TOPAZ-1, characteristics of LTS were generally consistent with the FAS. Overall, LTS were more common with D + GC; LTS in the PBO + GC group appear to be associated with higher frequency of subsequent treatments, including immunotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03875235 . [Table: see text]

A randomized, multi-center phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and capecitabine (GemCap) compared to capecitabine (Cap) alone in curatively resected biliary tract cancer (BilGemCap Study): KCSG HB20-14

TPS633

Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are usually diagnosed at an advanced stage; thus, only 20% of the patients are eligible for surgical resection with curative intent, with 5-year overall survival of less than 10% for all patients. Recent phase 3 trials using single agent such as Cap or S1 support the role of adjuvant chemotherapy as standard of care in patients with resected BTCs, but the efficacy still needs to be further improved. Therefore, we designed a randomized, multi-center, phase 3 trial comparing GemCap with Cap in curatively resected BTC patients. Methods: The primary endpoint is 24-month disease-free survival (DFS) and secondary endpoints are overall survival (OS), quality of life (QOL), toxicities and exploratory biomarker analysis. Referring to the recent results of BILCAP study, the sample size calculation is based on the assumption that the 24-month DFS would be 50% in the Cap arm, and that treatment with GemCap would improve the 24-months DFS by 10%, from 50% to 60%. As such, 490 patients and 337 events are needed to detect a HR of 0.737, with a two-sided significance level of 5% and 80% power. Patients aged 19 years or older with macroscopically resected intra- or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and muscle-invasive gallbladder cancer (T2-4 or N1-2, M0) are eligible. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status have to be 0-1, and adequate renal, hematological, and liver function is required. Patients who had not completely recovered within 12 weeks from surgery or who had previous history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy for BTC are also excluded. Patients are randomly assigned 1:1 to the GemCap arm or the Cap arm, stratified by LN status (N0 vs. N+), resection status (R0 vs. R1) and primary site. After randomization, either oral Cap (1250 mg/m²) twice a day on days 1 to 14 of a 3-weekly cycle (8 cycles), or oral Cap (830 mg/m²) twice a day on days 1 to 21 plus Gem (830 mg/m²) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 4-weeky cycle (6 cycles) are given. As of September 2022, 147 patents have been randomized to each arm, and updated study status will be presented. This is a collaborative study with Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG) and Korean Pancreas Surgery Club (KPSC), supported by a grant from the National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HA22C0053). This is prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT0005056. Clinical trial information: NCT0005056 .

A phase 1b, open-label, safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of an anti–super-enhancer triptolide analogue with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

TPS769

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most aggressive malignancies and the leading cause of cancer-related death in the world, although recent advances in chemotherapies for metastatic PDAC provide better clinical outcomes. Triptolide (TPL), a natural compound isolated from the Chinese herb has shown promising antitumor activity though the inhibition of HSP70 in a number of preclinical models including pancreatic cancer. In addition, TPL disrupt super-enhancer networks in pancreatic cancer cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts to reprogram the cellular cross talk and signaling in tumor environment. Minnelide (ML), water soluble, novel prodrug of TPL, was recently reported to show promising activity in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies in phase I trial. Based on the strong synergism with nab-paclitaxel (A) plus gemcitabine (G), we designed this phase 1b study. Methods: Eligible patients will have histologically confirmed PDAC and have failed first-line FOLFIRINOX with adequate organ function and performance status. This study is composed of two parts; dose escalation and dose expansion. In the dose escalation part (phase 1b), different dose levels of ML (0.25 mg to 1.0 mg once a day) in combination with A plus G will be tested with 3+3 subjects recruited in each cohort. Patients in each cohort will receive ML 0.25 to 1.0 mg orally once a day on days 1-5, 8-12 and 15-19 with A 100-125mg/m2 intravenously plus G 800-1000mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8 & 15 of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint is to determine the safety of ML with A+G and to determine PFS by Independent Radiological Review (IRR). Once an MTD reaches, a total of 18 patients will be enrolled at MTD level in dose expansion part. The key secondary endpoints are to determine the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics effect, the percentage of patients who achieve an objective confirmed overall response by IRR, maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose for phase 2 of ML in combination of A+G. As of September 2022, the study is just initiated for patient enrollment in first cohort. This study is prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05557851. Clinical trial information: NCT05557851 .

Comprehensive immunoprofile analysis of prognostic markers in pancreaticobiliary tract cancers

Pancreaticobiliary tract cancer has a poor prognosis with unmet needs in a new target treatment. Some studies have reported that an enhancement of T-cell immunity is associated with a good prognosis. The aim of this study is to investigate the immunoprofile as a prognostic marker of pancreaticobiliary tract cancers. Unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC, n = 80) and biliary tract cancer (BTC, n = 74) diagnosed between January 2012 and December 2018 in Samsung Medical Center were analyzed. Expression levels of CD8, FOXP3, PD-1, PD-L1, and CXCL13 in PDAC and BTC tissue samples were examined with immunohistochemical staining, which was evaluated with various clinical factors. In PDAC, higher degree of PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with shorter overall survival (OS) (p = 0.0095). On the other hand, higher infiltrations of PD-1⁺ immune cells (p = 0.0002) and CD8⁺ T cells (p = 0.0067) were associated with longer OS. In BTC, higher FOXP3⁺ (p = 0.0343) and CD8⁺ (p = 0.0028) cell infiltrations were associated with better survival. Low infiltration of CD8⁺ (p = 0.0148), FOXP3⁺ (p = 0.0208), PD-1⁺ (p = 0.0318) cells in PDAC, and FOXP3⁺ cells (p = 0.005) in BTC were considerably related to metastasis. In a combined evaluation of clinical factors and immunoprofiles, univariate analysis revealed that operation after chemotherapy (p < 0.0001), mass size (p = 0.0004), metastasis (p = 0.006), PD-L1 (p < 0.0001), PD-1 (p = 0.003) and CD8 (p = 0.0063) was significantly associated with OS in PDAC, and CD8 (p = 0.007) was statistically related to OS in BTC. In multivariate analysis, prognostic factors were operation after chemotherapy (p = 0.021) in PDAC and CD8 (p = 0.037) in BTC. Therefore, immunoprofile analysis of cells expressing CD8, FOXP3, PD-1, and PD-L1 might have prognostic values in patients with pancreaticobiliary tract cancers.

A Phase II Study of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy with Capecitabine Plus Simvastatin in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this phase II trial was to evaluate whether the addition of simvastatin, a synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with capecitabine confers a clinical benefit to patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with LARC (defined by clinical stage T3/4 and/or lymph node positivity) received preoperative radiation (45-50.4 Gy in 25-28 daily fractions) with concomitant capecitabine (825 mg/m2 twice per day) and simvastatin (80 mg, daily). Curative surgery was planned 4-8 weeks after completion of the CRT regimen. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR). The secondary endpoints included sphincter-sparing surgery, R0 resection, disease-free survival, overall survival, the pattern of failure, and toxicity.

RESULTS

Between October 2014 and July 2017, 61 patients were enrolled; 53 patients completed CRT regimen and underwent total mesorectal excision. The pCR rate was 18.9% (n=10) by per-protocol analysis. Sphincter-sparing surgery was performed in 51 patients (96.2%). R0 resection was achieved in 51 patients (96.2%). One patient experienced grade 3 liver enzyme elevation. No patient experienced additional toxicity caused by simvastatin.

CONCLUSION

The combination of 80 mg simvastatin with CRT and capecitabine did not improve pCR in patients with LARC, although it did not increase toxicity.

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in biliary tract cancer with KRAS mutation

Background

With a 15% incidence, KRAS is one of the most common mutations in biliary tract cancer (BTC) and is a poor prognostic factor. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as salvage therapy have modest activity in BTC.

Objectives

There are limited data on the efficacy of ICIs according to KRAS mutation in BTC. We evaluated the efficacy of ICIs in BTC patients with or without KRAS mutations.

Design

Retrospective observational study.

Methods

We conducted molecular profiling in BTC patients who received ICIs as salvage therapy. The expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) on tumor cells was assessed using immunohistochemistry. The TruSight^TM Oncology 500 assay from Illumina was used as a cancer panel. We analyzed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of ICI in BTC patients according to KRAS mutation and PD-L1 expression.

Results

A total of 62 patients were included in this analysis. The median age was 68.0 years; 47 patients (75.8%) received pembrolizumab and 15 (24.2%) received nivolumab as salvage therapy. All patients received gemcitabine plus cisplatin as the frontline therapy, and 53.2% received fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) before ICI. The median number of lines of prior chemotherapy was 2.5. The KRAS mutation was found in 13 patients (19.1%), and 28 patients (45.2%) showed 1% or more of tumor cells out of visible tumor cells positive for PD-L1. There was no statistical correlation between KRAS mutation and PD-L1 expression. The median OS and PFS with ICI were 5.6 [interquartile range (IQR): 3.3-8.0] and 3.8 (IQR: 3.0-4.5) months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in PFS with ICIs according to KRAS mutation (mutant type versus wild type) and PD-L1 expression (positive versus negative). In subgroup analysis, patients with both KRAS mutation and PD-L1 positivity had longer PFS compared with patients with KRAS mutation and PD-L1 negativity (10.1 versus 2.6 months, p = 0.047). This finding was not shown in patients with wild-type KRAS.

Conclusion

Our analysis suggested that PD-L1 expression might be a useful biomarker for ICIs in BTC patients with KRAS mutation but not in those with wild-type KRAS.

Multi-biomarker panel prediction model for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The current study aimed to develop a prediction model using a multi-marker panel as a diagnostic screening tool for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Multi-center cohort of 1991 blood samples were collected from January 2011 to September 2019, of which 609 were normal, 145 were other cancer (colorectal, thyroid, and breast cancer), 314 were pancreatic benign disease, and 923 were pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The automated multi-biomarker Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay kit was developed using three potential biomarkers: LRG1, TTR, and CA 19-9. Using a logistic regression model on a training data set, the predicted values for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were obtained, and the result was classification into one of the three risk groups: low, intermediate, and high. The five covariates used to create the model were sex, age, and three biomarkers.

RESULTS

Participants were categorized into four groups as normal (n = 609), other cancer (n = 145), pancreatic benign disease (n = 314), and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 923). The normal, other cancer, and pancreatic benign disease groups were clubbed into the non-pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma group (n = 1068). The positive and negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity were 94.12, 90.40, 93.81, and 90.86, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a significant diagnostic performance of the multi-marker panel in distinguishing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from normal and benign pancreatic disease states, as well as patients with other cancers.

Adjuvant nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Results From a Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial

PURPOSE

This randomized, open-label trial compared the efficacy and safety of adjuvant nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine with those of gemcitabine for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01964430 ).

METHODS

We assigned 866 treatment-naive patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) + gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) or gemcitabine alone to one 30-40 infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of six 28-day cycles. The primary end point was independently assessed disease-free survival (DFS). Additional end points included investigator-assessed DFS, overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-seven of 432 patients and 310 of 434 patients completed nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine and gemcitabine treatment, respectively. At primary data cutoff (December 31, 2018; median follow-up, 38.5 [interquartile range [IQR], 33.8-43 months), the median independently assessed DFS was 19.4 ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) versus 18.8 months (gemcitabine; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.729 to 1.063; P = .18). The median investigator-assessed DFS was 16.6 (IQR, 8.4-47.0) and 13.7 (IQR, 8.3-44.1) months, respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.694 to 0.965; P = .02). The median OS (427 events; 68% mature) was 40.5 (IQR, 20.7 to not reached) and 36.2 (IQR, 17.7-53.3) months, respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.680 to 0.996; P = .045). At a 16-month follow-up (cutoff, April 3, 2020; median follow-up, 51.4 months [IQR, 47.0-57.0]), the median OS (511 events; 81% mature) was 41.8 ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) versus 37.7 months (gemcitabine; HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.687 to 0.973; P = .0232). At the 5-year follow-up (cutoff, April 9, 2021; median follow-up, 63.2 months [IQR, 60.1-68.7]), the median OS (555 events; 88% mature) was 41.8 versus 37.7 months, respectively (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.678 to 0.947; P = .0091). Eighty-six percent ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) and 68% (gemcitabine) of patients experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Two patients per study arm died of treatment-emergent adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The primary end point (independently assessed DFS) was not met despite favorable OS seen with nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine.

Transcriptomic Profiling Identifies an Exosomal microRNA Signature for Predicting Recurrence Following Surgery in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

We performed genome-wide expression profiling to develop an exosomal miRNA panel for predicting recurrence following surgery in patients with PDAC.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pretreatment risk stratification is essential for offering individualized treatments to patients with PDAC, but predicting recurrence following surgery remains clinically challenging.

METHODS

We analyzed 210 plasma and serum specimens from 4 cohorts of PDAC patients. Using a discovery cohort (n = 25), we performed genome-wide sequencing to identify candidate exosomal miRNAs (exo-miRNAs). Subsequently, we trained and validated the predictive performance of the exo-miRNAs in two clinical cohorts (training cohort: n = 82, validation cohort: n = 57) without neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), followed by a post-NAT clinical cohort (n = 46) as additional validation.

RESULTS

We performed exo-miRNA expression profiling in plasma specimens obtained before any treatment in a discovery cohort. Subsequently we optimized and trained a 6-exo-miRNA risk-prediction model, which robustly discriminated patients with recurrence [area under the curve (AUC): 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70-0.89] and relapse-free survival (RFS, P < 0.01) in the training cohort. The identified exo-miRNA panel was successfully validated in an independent validation cohort (AUC: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65- 0.88, RFS: P < 0.01), where it exhibited comparable performance in the post-NAT cohort (AUC: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.57-0.85, RFS: P < 0.01) and emerged as an independent predictor for RFS (hazard ratio: 2.84, 95% CI: 1.30-6.20).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a novel, noninvasive exo-miRNA signature that robustly predicts recurrence following surgery in patients with PDAC; highlighting its potential clinical impact for optimized patient selection and improved individualized treatment strategies.

Overall Survival Results From the POLO Trial: A Phase III Study of Active Maintenance Olaparib Versus Placebo for Germline BRCA-Mutated Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE

The phase III POLO study demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit for active olaparib maintenance therapy versus placebo for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and a germline BRCA mutation. Here, we report the final analysis of overall survival (OS) and other secondary end points.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with a deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCA mutation whose disease had not progressed after ≥ 16 weeks of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 3:2 to active maintenance olaparib (300 mg twice daily) or placebo. The primary end point was PFS; secondary end points included OS, time to second disease progression or death, time to first and second subsequent cancer therapies or death, time to discontinuation of study treatment or death, and safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

In total, 154 patients were randomly assigned (olaparib, n = 92; placebo, n = 62). No statistically significant OS benefit was observed (median 19.0 v 19.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.22; P = .3487). Kaplan-Meier OS curves separated at approximately 24 months, and the estimated 3-year survival after random assignment was 33.9% versus 17.8%, respectively. Median time to first subsequent cancer therapy or death (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.66; P < .0001), time to second subsequent cancer therapy or death (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.89; P = .0111), and time to discontinuation of study treatment or death (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.63; P < .0001) significantly favored olaparib. The HR for second disease progression or death favored olaparib without reaching statistical significance (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.02; P = .0613). Olaparib was well tolerated with no new safety signals.

CONCLUSION

Although no statistically significant OS benefit was observed, the HR numerically favored olaparib, which also conferred clinically meaningful benefits including increased time off chemotherapy and long-term survival in a subset of patients.

MET gene alterations predict poor survival following chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancer

Background: To aid in oncology drug development, we investigated MET proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase gene aberrations in 2,239 oncology patients who underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) in clinical practice. Materials and methods: From November 2019 to January 2021, 2,239 patientswith advanced solid tumors who visited oncology clinics underwent NGS. The NGS panel included >500 comprehensive NGS tests using archival tissue specimens. Programmed death-ligand 1(PD-L1) 22C3 assay results and clinical records regarding initial chemotherapy were available for 1,137 (50.8%) and 1,761 (78.7%) patients, respectively for overall survival (OS) analysis. Results: The 2,239 patients represented 37 types of cancer. The NGS panel included >500 genes, microsatellite instability status, tumor mutational burden, and fusions. The most common cancer types were colorectal (N = 702), gastric (N = 481), and sarcoma (N = 180). MET aberrations were detected in 212 patients. All MET-amplified tumors had microsatellite stable status, and 8 had a high tumor mutational burden. Of 46 patients with MET-amplified cancers, 8 had MET-positive protein expression by immunohistochemistry (2+ and 3+). MET fusion was detected in 10 patients. Partner genes of MET fusion included ST7, TFEC, LRRD1, CFTR, CAV1, PCM1, HLA-DRB1, and CAPZA2. In survival analysis, patients with amplification of MET gene fusion had shorter OS and progression-free survival (PFS) than those without. Thus, MET aberration was determined to be a factor of response to chemotherapy. Conclusion: Approximately 2.1% and 0.4% of patients with advanced solid tumors demonstrated MET gene amplification and fusion, respectively, and displayed a worse response to chemotherapy and significantly shorter OS and PFS than those without MET gene amplification or fusion.

Abstract A017: Phase 1b Study of 2nd line vactosertib plus oxaliplatin with 5FU/LV (FOLFOX) in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who have failed first-line gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel

Background: Despite of recent advances in chemotherapies, PDAC remains aggressive malignancies and the leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. TGF-β is strongly involved in the tumor microenvironment in PDAC, and dysregulation of TGF-β signaling is a frequent molecular disturbance in progression and metastasis. Vactosertib is an orally bioavailable TGF-β signaling inhibitor that targets the TGF-β type I receptor kinase. In in vivo studies, vactosertib in combination with FOLFOX improves pancreatic cancer survival by suppressing cell migration, invasion, and EMT, highlighting a potential clinical application of this approach for PDAC patients. Based on this preclinical study, we develop a phase 1b study to determine the RP2D and to evaluate the safety of vactosertib in combination with FOLFOX in patients with metastatic PDAC who have failed first-line gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel. Methods: Eligible patients have histologically confirmed PDAC who have failed first-line gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel with adequate organ function and performance status. This study is composed of two parts; dose escalation and dose expansion. In the dose escalation part, different dose levels of vactosertib (50 mg bid, 100 mg bid, and 200 mg bid) for escalation were tested, starting with dose level 0 (DL 0, 100 mg bid) with 3 to 6 subjects recruited in each cohort. DL -1 was only planned to test when DL 0 was unacceptable. In the dose expansion part, an additional backfill cohort was planned to open for determination of the final RP2D. Patients in each cohort were planned to receive vactosertib 50-200 mg orally twice per day 1-5 & day 8-12 with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1, LV 200mg/m2 IV on day 1, 5FU 200mg/m2 bolus on day 1 and continuous 5-FU 2400mg/m2 infusion over 48 hours every 2 weeks. The primary endpoints were to determine RP2D and to evaluate safety of this combination. The key secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) based on RECIST 1.1 and overall survival. Results: A total of 16 patients were enrolled, 3 in DL 0, 4 in DL 1 and 9 in DL 1 backfill cohort. No dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed and the RP2D was established as vactosertib 200 mg orally twice per day 1-5 & day 8-12 with FOLFOX. The vactosertib related adverse events (AEs) of any grade included fatigue, nausea, vomiting and anorexia. Three of 13 patients (23.1%) had partial response and 5 (38.5%) stable disease as best response, with clinical benefit rate of 61.5 % in DL 1, while there were no PR or SD in DL 0. Median PFS was 4.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3–7.1] and median OS was 9.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.86–13.7]. Conclusion: In this phase Ib study, we demonstrated the feasibility and safety of adding vactosertib to FOLFOX in 2nd line setting, which needs to be further investigated. Updated results, including PK analyses, safety profiles, and clinical outcomes will be presented. This study was prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03666832.

Citation Format: Joon Oh Park, Seung Tae Kim, Eunji Hong, Jung Yong Hong, Young Suk Park, Seong-Jin Kim. Phase 1b Study of 2nd line vactosertib plus oxaliplatin with 5FU/LV (FOLFOX) in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who have failed first-line gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer; 2022 Sep 13-16; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(22 Suppl):Abstract nr A017.

An Exosome-based Transcriptomic Signature for Noninvasive, Early Detection of Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) incidence is rising worldwide, and most patients present with an unresectable disease at initial diagnosis. Measurement of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels lacks adequate sensitivity and specificity for early detection; hence, there is an unmet need to develop alternate molecular diagnostic biomarkers for PDAC. Emerging evidence suggests that tumor-derived exosomal cargo, particularly micro RNAs (miRNAs), offer an attractive platform for the development of cancer-specific biomarkers. Herein, genomewide profiling in blood specimens was performed to develop an exosome-based transcriptomic signature for noninvasive and early detection of PDAC.

METHODS

Small RNA sequencing was undertaken in a cohort of 44 patients with an early-stage PDAC and 57 nondisease controls. Using machine-learning algorithms, a panel of cell-free (cf) and exosomal (exo) miRNAs were prioritized that discriminated patients with PDAC from control subjects. Subsequently, the performance of the biomarkers was trained and validated in independent cohorts (n = 191) using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assays.

RESULTS

The sequencing analysis initially identified a panel of 30 overexpressed miRNAs in PDAC. Subsequently using qRT-PCR assays, the panel was reduced to 13 markers (5 cf- and 8 exo-miRNAs), which successfully identified patients with all stages of PDAC (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.98 training cohort; AUC = 0.93 validation cohort); but more importantly, was equally robust for the identification of early-stage PDAC (stages I and II; AUC = 0.93). Furthermore, this transcriptomic signature successfully identified CA19-9 negative cases (<37 U/mL; AUC = 0.96), when analyzed in combination with CA19-9 levels, significantly improved the overall diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.99 vs AUC = 0.86 for CA19-9 alone).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, an exosome-based liquid biopsy signature for the noninvasive and robust detection of patients with PDAC was developed.

The Feasibility of Stereotactic Body Proton Beam Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer

Background/Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body proton beam therapy (SBPT) for pancreatic cancer. Methods: This retrospective study included 49 patients who underwent SBPT for pancreatic cancer between 2017 and 2020. Survival outcomes, bowel-related toxicities, and failure patterns were analysed. SBPT was performed after induction chemotherapy in 44 (89.8%) patients. The dose-fractionation scheme included 60 gray (Gy) relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in five fractions (n = 42, 85.7%) and 50 GyRBE in five fractions (n = 7, 14.3%). The median follow-up was 16.3 months (range, 1.8−45.0 months). Results: During follow-up, the best responses were complete response, partial response, and stable disease in four (8.2%), 13 (26.5%), and 31 (63.3%) patients, respectively. The 2-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and local control (LC) rates were 67.6%, 38.0%, and 73.0%, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 gastroduodenal (GD) toxicity occurred in three (6.1%) patients. Among them, one patient underwent endoscopic haemostasis. The other two patients received surgical management. They were followed up without disease progression for >30 months after SBPT. Overall, there was no significant dosimetric difference between the grade ≥ 2 and lower toxicity groups. Conclusions: SBPT provides relatively high LC rates with acceptable toxicities in pancreatic cancer.

Expression of PD-L1 as a predictive marker of sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND

Expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) has been reported to correlate with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in various tumor types. However, there are few data on the role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive and prognostic biomarker of sensitivity to ICIs in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC).

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive and prognostic biomarker of response to ICIs in patients with advanced BTC.

DESIGN

We retrospectively analyzed data from 83 advanced BTC patients who received ICIs as second- or third-line treatment between February 2018 and April 2021.

METHODS

All patient data analysis included evaluation of PD-L1 expression by the combined positive score (CPS).

RESULTS

Among 83 patients, 56 (67.5%) had PD-L1 positivity (CPS ⩾ 1). The objective response rate (ORR) to ICIs was significantly higher in advanced BTC patients with PD-L1 expression compared to those without PD-L1 expression (17.8% versus 0%, p = 0.026). However, there were no significant differences in median progression-free survival (PFS; 2.9 versus 2.6 months, p = 0.330) and median overall survival (OS; 8.1 versus 6.3 months, p = 0.289) as a response to ICIs between patients with and without PD-L1 expression. Also, there were no significant differences in ORR, PFS, and OS as a response to ICIs in conjunction with a response to a prior gemcitabine plus cisplatin regimen (p = 0.654, p = 0.278, and p = 0.302, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that the expression of PD-L1 alone was not sufficient as a novel marker to select advanced BTC patients who might benefit from ICIs. Additional comprehensive studies of biomarkers that can assist in predicting BTC patient responses to pembrolizumab and/or nivolumab therapy are required.

Abstract 3389: An exosomal miRNA-based liquid biopsy signature for the noninvasive early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is projected to become the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States by 2030. Most of the PDAC patients are diagnosed with advanced disease, and less than 20% of patients are resectable at the time of diagnosis. The current imaging tools and blood markers (e.g. CA 19-9), are inadequate for early disease detection due to their poor specificity and sensitivity. This highlights the need to develop robust, noninvasive biomarkers for early detection of PDAC. While a large body of literature supports the use of cell-free miRNAs (cf-miRNAs) as potential diagnostic biomarkers in cancer, their tumor specificity is often debatable. Given the emerging evidence that exosomal cargo is a more robust representation of individual tumor types, in this study we sought to explore the diagnostic potential of cf-miRNAs along with exosomal miRNAs (exo-miRNAs), to establish a non-invasive miRNA signature for the early detection of PDAC.

Methods: As part of the NCI’s Pancreatic Cancer Detection Consortium (PCDC) funded project, in this study, small RNA-sequencing was performed in exosome and cell-free (cf) samples from a cohort of 57 PDAC cases and 57 non-disease controls. Using rigorous bioinformatic and biostatistical approaches, we prioritized a panel of cf- and exo-miRNAs and evaluated its diagnostic performance in the sequencing-based discovery and validation cohorts. Subsequently, the performance of the discovered miRNA panel was validated using qRT-PCR assays in an independent clinical validation cohort of PDAC patients and non-disease controls (n=48/each group). The results were examined by ROC curve analysis to determine the diagnostic power of the biomarker panel individually and in combination for their ability to discriminate PDAC from controls.

Results: The genomewide transcriptomic analyses led to the identification of a panel of 13 cf-miRNA and 17 exo-miRNA candidates. Sequencing validation in an independent cohort revealed that a combined panel of cf and exo-miRNAs exhibited an area under curve (AUC) of 0.89. Subsequent risk score analysis demonstrated that our biomarker signature was also robust in the identification of PDAC patients with early-stage cancers (stage I & II) vs. controls (p &lt;0.001). Moreover, when we combined the miRNA biomarker panel with CA19-9 values, the diagnostic performance was significantly superior when compared to the biomarker panel alone. Finally, the validation efforts in clinical cohorts by qRT-PCR revealed that the combined miRNA panel yielded an impressive accuracy with an AUC of 0.91, and a sensitivity of 0.88 and specificity of 0.87.

Conclusions: In conclusion, we report a novel, exosome-based miRNA signature for the early detection of patients with PDAC; which could potentially improve early-detection efforts for this fatal malignancy.

Citation Format: Kota Nakamura, Souvick Roy, Zhongxu Zhu, Eunsung Jun, Haiyong Han, Ruben M. Munoz, Satoshi Nishiwada, Geeta Sharma, Derek Cridebring, Frederic Zenhausern, Seungchan Kim, Denise Roe, Sourat Darabi, In Woong Han, Douglas Evans, Suguru Yamada, Michael Demure, Scott A. Celinski, Erkut Borazanci, Susan Tsai, John Bolton, Yasuhiro Kodera, Joon Oh Park, Song Cheol Kim, Xin Wang, Daniel Von Hoff, Ajay Goel. An exosomal miRNA-based liquid biopsy signature for the noninvasive early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3389.

Light-to-Moderate Alcohol Consumption Increases the Risk of Biliary Tract Cancer in Prediabetes and Diabetes, but Not in Normoglycemic Status: A Nationwide Cohort Study

PURPOSE

To determine whether the dose-response association between alcohol consumption and the risk of biliary tract cancer (BTC), including cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and gallbladder cancer (GBC), differs according to glycemic status.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This nationwide cohort study included 9,520,629 individuals age ≥ 20 years without a history of cancer who underwent national health screening under the Korean National Health Insurance Service in 2009. The participants were followed up until December 2018 for BTC development. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to estimate risk.

RESULTS

During the 78.3 million person-years of follow-up, 21,079 patients were newly diagnosed with BTC. In individuals with prediabetes and diabetes, light-to-moderate alcohol consumption increased the risk of CCA (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.20; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.28 and aHR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.47 to 1.69) and GBC (aHR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.31 and aHR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.64). In normoglycemic individuals, light-to-moderate alcohol consumption was not associated with CCA or GBC risk. When heavy alcohol consumption was combined with diabetes, CCA and GBC risk increased synergistically (aHR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.83 to 2.26; and aHR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.33 to 2.04, respectively; all P < .001). Prediabetes and heavy alcohol consumption had a synergistic interactive effect on CCA and GBC risks (all P < .001). Comparable results were obtained for intrahepatic and extrahepatic CCA analyses.

CONCLUSION

Even light-to-moderate alcohol consumption was associated with an increased risk of BTC in individuals with prediabetes and diabetes, but not in normoglycemic individuals. Complete avoidance of alcohol consumption may help reduce the risk of BTC in patients with prediabetes and diabetes, suggesting the need for individualized prevention strategies for BTC.

Safety and efficacy of YBL-006, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody in advanced solid tumors: A phase I study

e14557

Background: YBL-006 is a fully human anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody under evaluating its safety and efficacy in phase I clinical trial. We have reported interim analysis of dose escalation cohort which showed a tolerable safety profile. Here, we present the updated clinical activity of YBL-006 in dose escalation and expansion cohorts. Methods: Dose escalation (0.5, 2, 5, 10 mg/kg) and dose expansion (flat doses of 200 mg every 2 weeks [Q2W] and 300 mg every 3 weeks [Q3W]) cohorts explored the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and objective response rate (ORR) in the patients with advanced solid tumors who failed or were ineligible to the standard of care. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using the CTCAE v5. ORR was assessed using the RECIST (v1.1). Lunit SCOPE IO, an H&E analysis tool, was applied as an exploratory biomarker, and samples with “Immune inflamed phenotype” were defined as those with high intratumoral TIL density in ≥ 20% of the tumor microenvironment. The cut-off date for analysis was Jan 4th, 2022. Results: A total of 67 patients (safety set) with advanced solid tumors were enrolled in the study. Median follow-up duration of the safety set was 1.6 months (range 0.2-16.8). There was no dose-limiting toxicity during dose escalation phase. Most frequent AEs were grade 1 or 2; fatigue (19.4%), pruritus (10.4%), and fever (7.5%), and two hypothyroidism (3.0%), one pneumonitis (1.5%), and one cytokine-releasing syndrome (1.5%) were observed. One subject experienced grade 3 diarrhea in the safety set. PK study showed that half-life was 8.0 days, and mean Cmax and AUC0-inf were 4.15 x 104 ng/ml and 1.12 x 107 ng/ml*h for 200 mg dose, and 6.26 x 104 ng/ml and 1.53 x 107 ng/ml*h for 300 mg dose, respectively. A total of 52 patients were evaluable for efficacy. ORR was 15.4%, including 1 complete response (penile squamous cell carcinoma [SqCC]), and 7 partial responses (two gastric adenocarcinomas, anal SqCC, paranasal sinus SqCC, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma, and thyroid Hurthle cell carcinoma). Durable responses were seen in 2 patients for over 12 months. Median duration of response was 4.9 weeks (range 1-65). Among efficacy set, 32 samples were available for Lunit SCOPE IO. ORR was significantly higher in inflamed immune phenotype compared to non-inflamed samples (62.5% vs 8.3% p = 0.005). Conclusions: Interim analysis of phase I trial of YBL-006 shows a tolerable safety profile and clinical activity. Notable anti-tumor efficacy was observed in inflamed immune phenotype. Clinical trial information: NCT04450901.

Phase 1b study of vactosertib in combination with oxaliplatin with 5FU/LV (FOLFOX) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who have failed first-line gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel

e16299

Background: TGF-β is strongly involved in the tumor microenvironment of PDAC, and dysregulation of TGF-β signaling is a frequent molecular disturbance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) progression and metastasis. Vactosertib is an orally bioavailable TGF-β signaling inhibitor that targets the TGF-β type I receptor kinase. In preclinical studies, vactosertib in combination with FOLFOX improves pancreatic cancer survival by suppressing cell migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), highlighting a potential clinical application of this approach for PDAC patients. We performed a phase 1b study to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and to evaluate the safety of vactosertib in combination with FOLFOX in patients with metastatic PDAC who have failed first-line gemcitabine/ nab-paclitaxel. Methods: Eligible patients have histologically confirmed PDAC who have failed first-line gemcitabine/ nab-paclitaxel with adequate organ function and performance status. This study is composed of two parts; dose escalation and dose expansion. In the dose escalation part (phase 1b), different dose levels of vactosertib (50 mg bid, 100 mg bid, and 200 mg bid) for escalation were tested, starting with dose level 0 (DL 0, 100 mg bid) with 3 to 6 subjects recruited in each cohort. DL -1 was only planned to test when DL 0 was unacceptable. In the dose expansion part, an additional backfill cohort was planned to open for determination of the final RP2D. Patients in each cohort were planned to receive vactosertib 50-200 mg orally twice per day 1-5 & day 8-12 with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1, LV 200mg/m2 IV on day 1, 5FU 200mg/m2 bolus on day 1 and continuous 5-FU 2400mg/m2 infusion over 48 hours every 2 weeks. The primary endpoints were to determine RP2D and to evaluate safety of this combination. The key secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) based on RECIST 1.1 and overall survival. Results: A total of 16 patients were enrolled, 3 in DL 0, 4 in DL 1 and 9 in DL 1 backfill cohort. No dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed and the RP2D was established as vactosertib 200 mg orally twice per day 1-5 & day 8-12 with FOLFOX. The vactosertib related adverse events (AEs) of any grade included fatigue, nausea, vomiting and anorexia. Three of 13 patients (23.1%) had partial response and 5 (38.5%) stable disease as best response, with clinical benefit rate of 61.5 % in DL 1, while there were no PR or SD in DL 0. Median PFS was 5.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.27–8.93]. Conclusions: In this phase Ib study, we demonstrated the feasibility and safety of adding vactosertib to FOLFOX in 2nd line setting, which needs to be further investigated. Updated results, including PK analyses, safety profiles, ORR, PFS and overall survival, will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03666832.

Determining Which Patients Require Preoperative Pelvic Radiotherapy Before Curative-Intent Surgery and/or Ablation for Metastatic Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to determine the optimal indications for preoperative pelvic radiotherapy (RT) in patients with metastatic rectal cancer who underwent curative-intent surgical resection and/or ablation.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and October 2019, 246 patients who met our inclusion criteria were enrolled. Preoperative RT was performed in 22 patients (8.9%). Lower margin below the peritoneal reflection (p < 0.001), mesorectal fascia (MRF) invasion (p = 0.02), and lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) involvement (p = 0.005) were more frequent in the preoperative RT group.

RESULTS

During the median follow-up period of 13.3 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.0-36.3 months), local recurrence (LR) was identified in 60 patients (24.4%). It was the first site of recurrence in 45 of them (18.3%). Among them, three patients were in the preoperative RT group. On multivariable analysis, lower margin below the peritoneal reflection, MRF invasion, LPLN involvement, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level ≥ 10 ng/mL before treatment, and preoperative RT were significant prognostic factors for LR-free survival (LRFS). In the patient group without any risk factors, the 2-year LRFS rate was 94.9% without preoperative RT. In the patient group with one or more risk factors, the 2-year LRFS was 64.4% without and 95.2% with preoperative RT.

CONCLUSION

LR developed in about 25% of patients within 2 years. Preoperative RT should be considered, especially in patients with a risk factor for LR, including lower margin below the peritoneal reflection, MRF invasion, LPLN involvement, or CEA ≥ 10 ng/mL before treatment.

HER2 Aberrations as a Novel Marker in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

HER2 aberrations have been reported as a novel biomarker in HER2-directed therapy or as a prognostic marker in various tumor types. However, in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), there have been few studies regarding HER2 aberrations as a biomarker. We analyzed 121 advanced BTC patients who had been treated with Gemcitabine/Cisplatin (GP) as a 1st line therapy between November 2019 and April 2021. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), namely, HER2 aberrations was performed in all patients. The TruSight™ Oncology 500 assay from Illumina was used for the NGS panel. Among 121 patients with advanced BTC, HER2 aberrations were observed in 18 patients (14.9%). For subtypes of HER2 aberrations, point mutation was observed in 5 patients (27.8%), gene amplification in 11 patients (61.1%), and both point mutation and gene amplification in 2 patients (11.1%). The frequency of HER2 aberrations was significantly different according to the primary tumor (p = 0.009). In gallbladder cancer, HER2 aberrations were observed at a relatively high frequency (36.4%). The tumor response to GP did not differ between patients with and without HER2 aberrations (33.3%, vs. 26.2%, respectively, p = 0.571). The median progression-free survival (PFS) to GP was 4.7 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 5.5 months) in patients with HER2 aberrations and 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.2 to 8.8 months) without HER2 aberrations (p = 0.776). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached and not reached in patients with and without HER2 aberrations (p = 0.739), respectively. The univariate analysis for PFS to GP and OS showed that HER2 aberrations were not an independent factor for survival. This study showed that the HER2 aberrations were observed in 14.9% of advanced BTC and were not an independent biomarker for survival.

Association between alcohol consumption and pancreatic cancer risk differs by glycaemic status: A nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

The dose-response association between alcohol consumption and the subsequent pancreatic cancer risk by individuals' glycaemic status is unclear.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHOD

This large-scale nationwide cohort study included 9,514,171 adults without cancer who underwent health examinations under the Korean National Health Insurance Service in 2009 and were followed-up until December 2017 for pancreatic cancer development. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up period of 7.3 years, 12,818 patients were newly-diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Among individuals with normoglycemia, a J-shaped association was observed between the frequency of alcohol consumption (1-2 and ≥5 days/week: hazards ratio [HR]; 95% CI, 0.91; 0.85-0.97 and 1.13; 1.002-1.27, respectively) and pancreatic cancer risk, after adjusting for potential confounders. However, in patients with impaired fasting glucose (IFG), pancreatic cancer risk increased with increased frequency and average daily amount of alcohol consumption (all P for trend <0.01). IFG combined with heavy alcohol consumption (30 g/day) was associated with 38% increased pancreatic cancer risk (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.23-1.54). Diabetes was associated with an increased pancreatic cancer risk regardless of alcohol consumption and 70% increased risk even in non-drinkers (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.61-1.80).

CONCLUSIONS

The J-shaped dose-response association between alcohol consumption and pancreatic cancer risk was observed only in individuals with normoglycemia, not in patients with IFG and diabetes. Complete alcohol abstinence may help reduce pancreatic cancer risk in patients with IFG and diabetes.

Changes in Metabolic Syndrome Status are Associated With Altered Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is reversible; however, the effect of changes in MetS status on pancreatic cancer risk is unknown. We aimed to investigate the effects of changes and persistence in MetS status on pancreatic cancer risk.

METHODS

This nationwide cohort study included 8,203,492 adults without cancer who underwent 2 consecutive biennial health screenings provided by the Korean National Health Insurance System between 2009 and 2012 and were followed up until 2017. MetS was defined as the presence of 3 of its 5 components, which were evaluated at 2 consecutive biennial health screenings. Participants were categorized into the MetS-free, MetS-recovered, MetS-developed, or MetS-persistent group. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used.

RESULTS

During the 40,464,586 person-years of follow-up (median, 5.1 years), 8010 individuals developed pancreatic cancer. Compared with the MetS-free group, the MetS-persistent group had the highest risk of pancreatic cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-1.37), followed by the MetS-developed group (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.09-1.25) and the MetS-recovered group (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.04-1.21) after adjusting for potential confounders (P for trend <.001). The MetS-recovered group was associated with a lower risk of pancreatic cancer than that in the MetS-persistent group (P < .001). The association between changes in MetS status and pancreatic cancer risk did not differ according to sex or obesity (all P for interactions >.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, recovering from MetS was associated with a reduced risk of pancreatic cancer compared with persistent MetS, suggesting that pancreatic cancer risk can be altered by changes in MetS.

Phase 1b study of vactosertib in combination with nal-IRI plus 5FU/LV in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who have failed first-line gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel

TPS632

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most aggressive malignancies and the leading cause of cancer-related death in the world, although recent advances in chemotherapies for metastatic PDAC provide better clinical outcomes. TGF-β is strongly involved in the tumor microenvironment of PDAC, and dysregulation of TGF-β signaling is a frequent molecular disturbance in PDAC progression and metastasis. Vactosertib is an orally bioavailable TGF-β signaling inhibitor that targets the TGF-β type I receptor kinase. In in vivo studies, vactosertib reduces cancer cell migration, invasion, and metastasis of various cancers, and combination of vactosertib with nal-IRI/5-FU/LV improves pancreatic cancer survival by suppressing cell migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), highlighting a potential clinical application of this approach for PDAC patients (Hong et al, 2020). Based on this preclinical study, we develop a phase 1b study to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and to evaluate the safety of vactosertib in combination with nal-IRI/5FU/LV in patients with metastatic PDAC who have failed first-line gemcitabine/ nab-paclitaxel. Methods: Eligible patients have histologically confirmed PDAC who have failed first-line gemcitabine/ nab-paclitaxel with adequate organ function and performance status. This study is composed of two parts; dose escalation and dose expansion. In the dose escalation part (phase 1b), different dose levels of vactosertib (100 mg bid, 200 mg bid, and 300 mg bid) for escalation will be tested, starting with dose level 0 (DL 0, 200 mg bid) with 3 to 6 subjects recruited in each cohort. DL -1 is only tested when DL 0 is unacceptable. In the dose expansion part, one or two additional backfill cohorts among DL -1 through DL 2 will be opened for determination of the final RP2D. For each cohort, a maximum of 12 patients can be enrolled including the dose escalation and dose expansion phase. Patients in each cohort will receive vactosertib 100-300 mg orally twice per day 1-5 & day 8-12 with nal-IRI 70mg/m2 intravenously day 1, LV 400mg/m2 IV day 1, and continuous 5-FU 2400mg/m2 infusion over 48 hours every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint is to determine RP2D and to evaluate safety of this combination. The key secondary endpoints are progression free survival, overall response rate, disease control rate based on RECIST 1.1 and overall survival. As of September 2021, 5 patients have been enrolled in DL 0 and 1 DLT has been reported in DL 0. This study is prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04258072. Clinical trial information: NCT04258072.

Randomized phase II study of nalicap (nal-IRI/capecitabine) compared to NAPOLI (nal-IRI/5-FU/LV) in gemcitabine-pretreated advanced pancreatic cancer: Trial-in-progress

TPS621

Background: Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) in combination with fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (LV), called the NAPOLI regimen, improves survival in advanced pancreatic cancer patients who failed gemcitabine-based chemotherapy (Wang-Gillam A et al. 2016). Capecitabine is an oral anti-cancer agent as the prodrug of 5-FU. Capecitabine has proven its efficacy in gastrointestinal cancers like stomach cancer, colon cancer, or pancreatic cancer. Replacing continuous 5-FU infusions with oral capecitabine with equivalent efficacy has been tested and is now widely used. However, in pancreatic cancer, replacing continuous infusion of 5-FU with an oral drug has not yet been tested. Therefore, this trial is being conducted with the aim of improving patient convenience while maintaining efficacy, when the continuous infusion of 5-FU/LV in NAPOLI (nal-IRI/5-FU/LV) regimen are replaced with oral capecitabine. This study is a two-arm, open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 2 trial to assess whether capecitabine plus nal-IRI combination treatment (NaliCap) is non-inferior to NAPOLI regimen in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: Eligible patients have histologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma who have failed to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. This trial is composed of two parts: safety lead-in-part and randomization part. NaliCap regimen consists of administration of capecitabine twice daily for day 1-14 and intravenous administration of nal-IRI for day 1 every 3weeks. To figure out recommended phase 2 dose of the NaliCap combination regimen, the safety lead-in-part is being conducted as a 3+3 design. In the randomization part, patients will be assigned to NAPOLI or NaliCap in a 1:1 ratio. The planned enrollment is 184 patients in the randomization part. Patients allocated to the NaliCap group will receive recommended phase 2 dose of NaliCap determined through the safety lead-in-part. Patients allocated with the NAPOLI group will receive nal-IRI 70mg/m2 intravenously day 1, LV 400mg/m2 IV day 1, and continuous 5-FU 2400mg/m2 infusion over 48hours every 2weeks. Response assessments are performed every 6 weeks using the RECIST criteria version 1.1 (every 2 cycles in the NaliCap group and every 3 cycles in the NAPOLI group). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival, with a non-inferior margin of the hazard ratio of 1.4. Key secondary endpoints are overall response rate, disease control rate, overall survival, safety, and quality of life. This study is prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04371224. Clinical trial information: NCT04371224.

Futibatinib, an Irreversible FGFR1-4 Inhibitor, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors Harboring FGF/FGFR Aberrations: A Phase I Dose-Expansion Study

Futibatinib, a highly selective, irreversible FGFR1-4 inhibitor, was evaluated in a large multihistology phase I dose-expansion trial that enrolled 197 patients with advanced solid tumors. Futibatinib demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 13.7%, with responses in a broad spectrum of tumors (cholangiocarcinoma and gastric, urothelial, central nervous system, head and neck, and breast cancer) bearing both known and previously uncharacterized FGFR1-3 aberrations. The greatest activity was observed in FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement-positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ORR, 25.4%). Some patients with acquired resistance to a prior FGFR inhibitor also experienced responses with futibatinib. Futibatinib demonstrated a manageable safety profile. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were hyperphosphatemia (81.2%), diarrhea (33.5%), and nausea (30.4%). These results formed the basis for ongoing futibatinib phase II/III trials and demonstrate the potential of genomically selected early-phase trials to help identify molecular subsets likely to benefit from targeted therapy. SIGNIFICANCE: This phase I dose-expansion trial demonstrated clinical activity and tolerability of the irreversible FGFR1-4 inhibitor futibatinib across a broad spectrum of FGFR-aberrant tumors. These results formed the rationale for ongoing phase II/III futibatinib trials in cholangiocarcinoma, breast cancer, gastroesophageal cancer, and a genomically selected disease-agnostic population.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 275.

Updated analysis with longer follow up of a phase 2a study evaluating erdafitinib in Asian patients (pts) with advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations

430

Background: Pts with CCA progressing after first-line therapy have limited treatment options. We report an updated analysis of the ongoing LUC2001 open-label, multicenter, phase 2a study (NCT02699606) investigating the efficacy and safety of erdafitinib in Asian pts with advanced CCA and FGFR alterations who progressed after ≥1 prior systemic treatment. Methods: Eligible adults (aged ≥18 years) received erdafitinib 8 mg once daily (QD) with pharmacodynamically guided up-titration to 9 mg QD. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; RECIST 1.1); secondary endpoints included best overall response (BOR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Survival estimates were determined by the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: Of 232 patients with CCA who underwent molecular screening, 39 (16.8%) had FGFR alterations (21 [9.1%] fusions and 19 [8.2%] mutations). Overall, 22 (9.5%) eligible pts (median age, 52 [range, 29–69] years) were enrolled and received treatment. Median follow-up was 22.4 (range, 2.3–47.0) months; median treatment duration was 6.2 (range, 1.5–35.6) months. All 22 pts received ≥1 line of prior systemic therapy and 12 (55.0%) pts had ≥2 prior lines of therapy. The ORR was 40.9% (95% CI, 20.7%–63.6%) and median time to response was 1.8 (range, 1.5–5.6) months. Median DOR was 7.3 (95% CI, 3.7–17.5) months, median PFS was 5.6 (95% CI, 3.6–12.7) months, and median OS was 40.2 (95% CI: 9.9–not estimable) months (Table). Responses were observed in 8/14 pts with FGFR fusions and 1/8 pts with FGFR mutations and in pts who received 1 or ≥2 prior lines of therapy. All 22 pts had ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), the most common being dry mouth (15/22 [68.2%]) and stomatitis (14/22 [63.6%]). Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 15/22 (68.2%) pts (11/22 [50.0%] were treatment related), of which the most common were stomatitis (3/22 [13.6%]) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased (3/22 [13.6%]); 11/22 (50.0%) pts had ≥1 serious TEAE (1/22 [4.5%] pts had a serious treatment-related TEAE). A TEAE leading to death occurred in 1 patient (sepsis; not treatment-related). Conclusions: Asian pts with advanced CCA and FGFR alterations treated with erdafitinib had durable efficacy and a manageable safety profile, supporting the earlier findings of erdafitinib benefit in this population. Clinical trial information: NCT02699606. [Table: see text]

Tumor Mutational Burden as a Biomarker for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

Background: High tumor mutational burden (TMB-H) has been reported as a predictive marker to immunotherapy or prognostic marker in various tumor types. However, there has been little study of the role of TMB-H in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). Methods: We analyzed 119 advanced BTC patients who received Gemcitabine/Cisplatin (GP) as a first-line treatment between November 2019 and April 2021. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), including TMB analysis, as a routine clinical practice was performed in 119 patients. The TruSight^TM Oncology 500 assay from Illumina was used as a cancer panel. Results: Among 119 patients, 18 (18.5%) had a tumor with high TMB (≥ 10 Muts/Mb). There were no significant differences between the status of TMB and clinical outcomes with GP, including objective response rate (ORR) (P = .126), disease control rate (DCR) (p = .454), and median progression-free survival (PFS) (p = .599). The median overall survival (OS) was not different between patients with TMB-H and no TMB-H (p = .430). In subgroup analysis of 32 patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICIs), there were significant differences in ORR (p = .034) and median PFS (p = .025) with ICIs between patients with and without TMB-H. Conclusions: This study revealed that TMB-H in advanced BTCs did not have a prognostic or role in the standard first-line treatment. However, TMB-H might be a predictive biomarker for response to ICIs in advanced BTC.

Association of prediabetes, diabetes, and diabetes duration with biliary tract cancer risk: A nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Population-based evidence of the association between diabetes and biliary tract cancer (BTC) risk is lacking. We aimed to evaluate the association of prediabetes, diabetes, and diabetes duration with subsequent risk of BTC, including cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and gallbladder cancer (GBC), in the Korean general population.

METHODS

This nationwide cohort study included 9,697,773 adults aged ≥20 years without cancer who underwent national health screening between January and December 2009. Subjects' glycemic status was categorized as normoglycemic, impaired fasting glucose (IFG), newly-diagnosed diabetes, diabetes duration <5 years, and diabetes duration ≥5 years. Incident BTC was identified using claims data. Follow-up continued until December 2017. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios and 95% CIs of BTC.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 7.2 years, 13,022 patients were newly diagnosed with BTC. Compared with the normoglycemic group, the IFG, newly-diagnosed diabetes, diabetes duration <5 years, and diabetes duration ≥5 years groups showed the following adjusted hazard ratios (95% CIs) for BTC: 1.08 (1.04-1.12), 1.31 (1.22-1.41), 1.35 (1.27-1.43), and 1.47 (1.39-1.55), respectively. BTC risk significantly increased with deteriorating glycemic status (P for trend <0.001). These results were consistent with those of CCA and GBC analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Both IFG and diabetes were independently associated with an increased risk of BTC, including CCA and GBC. A longer diabetes duration was associated with a further increase in BTC risk. Diabetes and even IFG may be modifiable risk factors for BTC.

The prevalence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in various solid tumors and the role of HRD as a single biomarker to immune checkpoint inhibitors

Purpose

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is related to tumorigenesis. Currently, the possibility of HRD as a prognostic biomarker to immune checkpoint inhibitors is unknown. We aimed to investigate whether HRD has potential as a biomarker for immunotherapy.

Methods

The status of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) was assessed with the next-generation sequencing (NGS) TruSight^™ Oncology 500 assay in 501 patients with advanced solid tumor including gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), or rare cancer. Results: among the 501 patients, HRD was observed as follows: 74.7% (347/501) patients; GU cancer (92.0%, 23 of 25), colorectal cancer (CRC) (86.1%, 130 of 151), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (83.3%, 10 of 12), pancreatic cancer (PC) (76.2%, 32 of 42), biliary tract cancer (BTC) (75.0%, 36 of 48), sarcoma (65.0%, 39 of 60), melanoma (52.4%, 11 of 21), other GI cancers (50.0%, 11 of 22), and rare cancer (50.0%, 2 of 4). Sixty-five of the 501 patients had received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) during the course of the disease. Tumor types of 65 patients treated with ICIs are as follows: melanoma (95.2%, 20 of 21), HCC (33.3%, 4 of 12), rare cancer (25.0%, 1 of 4), GC (12.2%, 14 of 116), BTC (10.4%, 5 of 48), and sarcoma (5.0%, 3 of 60). The most frequently reported mutations were BRCA2 (n = 90), ARID1A (n = 77), ATM (n = 71), BARD1 (n = 67). Patients without HRD exhibited an objective response rate (ORR) of 33.3% (4 of 12), and patients with HRD exhibited an ORR of 34.0% (18 of 53). There was no significant difference in ORR between patients with and without HRD (P = 0.967). Progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.5 months (95% CI 0.000–16.175) in patients without HRD and 4.1 months (95% CI 2.062–6.138) in patients with HRD, revealing no statistical significance (P = 0.441).

Conclusion

Herein, we reported the status of HRD using a cancer-panel for various solid tumor patients in routine clinical practice and demonstrated that HRD as a single biomarker was not sufficient to predict efficacy of ICIs in solid tumor patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-021-03781-6.

Comprehensive molecular profiling to predict clinical outcomes in pancreatic cancer

Background:

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has the worst prognosis among common cancers. The genomic landscape of PDAC is defined by four mutational pathways: kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS), cellular tumor antigen p53 (TP53), cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A), and SMAD family member 4 (SMAD4). However, there is a paucity of data on the molecular features associated with clinical outcomes after surgery or chemotherapy.

Methods:

We performed comprehensive molecular characterization of tumor specimens from 83 patients with PDAC who received surgery, using whole-exome sequencing and ribonucleic acid sequencing on tumor and matched normal tissues derived from patients. We also systematically performed integrative analysis, combining genomic, transcriptomic, and clinical features to identify biomarkers and possible therapeutic targets.

Results:

KRAS (75%), TP53 (67%), CDKN2A (12%), SMAD4 (20%), and ring finger protein 43 (RNF43) (13%) were identified as significantly mutated genes. The tumor-specific transcriptome was classified into two clusters (tumor S1 and tumor S2), which resembled the Moffitt tumor classification. Tumor S1 displayed two distinct subclusters (S1-1 and S1-2). The transcriptome of tumor S1-1 overlapped with the exocrine-like (Collisson)/ADEX (Bailey) subtype, while tumor S1-2 mostly consisted of the classical (Collisson)/progenitor (Bailey) subtype. In the analysis of combinatorial gene alterations, concomitant mutations of KRAS with low-density lipoprotein receptor related protein 1B (LRP1B) were associated with significantly worse disease-free survival after surgery (p = 0.034). One patient (1.2%) was an ultrahypermutant with microsatellite instability. We also identified high protein kinase C lota (PRKCI) expression as an overlapping, poor prognostic marker between our dataset and the TCGA dataset.

Conclusion:

We identified potential prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets of patients with PDAC. Understanding these molecular aberrations that determine patient outcomes after surgery and chemotherapy has the potential to improve the treatment outcomes of PDAC patients.

Role of adjuvant radiotherapy in extrahepatic bile duct cancer: A multicenter retrospective study (Korean Radiation Oncology Group 18-14)

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after curative resection in patients with extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) cancer.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and December 2015, 1475 patients with EHBD cancer who underwent curative resection were accrued from 14 institutions in Korea. Among these, 959 patients did not receive any adjuvant therapy (RT(-) group), while 516 underwent postoperative RT with or without chemotherapy (RT(+) group).

RESULTS

The median age was 67 years. Nodal involvement was present in 482 patients (32.7%), and resection margin was involved in 293 patients (19.9%). RT(+) group had more patients with proximal tumours, advanced tumours, nodal involvement, perineural invasion, and involved resection margin than RT(-) group (all p < 0.001). With a median follow-up of 36 months, there were 211 locoregional recurrences, 307 distant metastases and 322 combined locoregional and distant failures. On multivariate analysis incorporating age, tumour location, differentiation, pT classification, pN classification, perineural invasion and resection margin, adjuvant RT was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.86; p < 0.001). When RT(+) group was separated into RT alone, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and CCRT followed by chemotherapy, the greatest benefit was observed in patients treated with CCRT followed by chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant RT combined with chemotherapy improved survival outcomes of resected EHBD cancer patients. Considering the greatest benefit observed in patients receiving CCRT followed by chemotherapy, a randomised controlled trial comparing chemotherapy alone and CCRT followed by chemotherapy is urgently needed.

ATM Expression as a Prognostic Marker in Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Treated With First-line Gemcitabine and Platinum Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND/AIM

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) has a poor prognosis due to its highly invasive and metastatic potential. Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) is a key regulator of DNA damage response and an emerging therapeutic target; however, the association between the expression of ATM and the prognosis in advanced BTC is unknown. We aimed to identify the relationship between ATM expression, clinicopathological characteristics, and survival outcomes in patients with advanced BTC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed 113 patients with advanced BTC who received first-line gemcitabine and platinum.

RESULTS

The tumor location was intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IH-CCC) in 43 patients, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EH-CCC) in 49, and gallbladder (GB) cancer in 21 patients. Fifty-four patients (47.8%) exhibited loss of ATM protein expression. The overall response rate (ORR) of ATM loss and intact ATM was 13.3% and 19.6%, respectively. In a subgroup analysis, EH-CCC patients with ATM loss tended to have improved PFS after platinum-based chemotherapy compared to those with intact ATM (7.9 vs. 6.2 months, respectively; p=0.050).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that ATM loss could be a prognostic marker after platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced EH-CCC.