Sodium valproate in the treatment of aggressive behavior in patients with dementia--a randomized placebo controlled clinical trial

Difficult behaviors in long-term care patients with dementia

Difficult behaviors are relatively common challenges that can occur throughout the natural progression of dementia, but are particularly common in the mid to late stages of disease. These behaviors can be challenging to manage in nursing and assisted care facilities, and can cause distress to the caregivers and to the patients themselves. Our ability to manage these symptoms can have a profound effect on the patient's quality of life. This article reviews the appropriate assessment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) and the literature supporting various nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatments. Nonpharmacologic approaches should be the initial focus for treatment of most BPSD, but should these prove inadequate, a variety of medications are available with varying degrees of clinical research to support their use in ameliorating BPSD.

Divalproex sodium in nursing home residents with possible or probable Alzheimer Disease complicated by agitation: a randomized, controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Three placebo-controlled clinical trials have suggested the benefit of valproate for treatment of agitation associated with dementia; one was used as the basis for this multicenter trial, conducted by the Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Cooperative Study. It addresses the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of divalproex sodium for the treatment of agitation associated with dementia.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in 153 nursing home residents with probable or possible AD complicated by agitation; 110 (72%) completed the trial. Participants were randomized to treatment with divalproex sodium at a target dose of 750 mg/day (N = 75) or placebo (N = 78) for 6 weeks. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Agitation factor. Secondary outcomes included total BPRS, Clinical Global Impression of Change, Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory score, and measures of safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

Compliance averaged 88%. Participants receiving divalproex achieved a mean dose of 800 mg/day. Change in mean BPRS Agitation factor scores did not differ between patients treated with divalproex and placebo, nor did secondary behavioral measures. Measures of safety and tolerability did not reveal clinically important drug/placebo differences.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter trial showed no benefit of divalproex sodium for treatment for agitation in dementia at a mean dose of 800 mg/day over 6 weeks. The results do not support findings from previous trials indicating possible benefit.

Divalproex Sodium for the Treatment of Behavioural Problems Associated With Dementia in the Elderly

Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are a frequent problem in patients with dementia. The consequences of these neuropsychiatric problems can be significant for both patient and caregiver. Although there is no universally accepted pharmaceutical intervention for the treatment of BPSD, various agents have been studied, including divalproex sodium (valproate semisodium). The results of four placebo-controlled clinical trials are reviewed. None of the studies was sufficient to define clinical practice and the results can be seen as conflicting and inconclusive. Three studies suggested possible short-term efficacy, tolerability and safety of divalproex sodium for agitation and some other neuropsychiatric symptoms associated with dementia in elderly patients; in two of these studies, the findings were obtained only on analysis of secondary outcomes. Benefits of divalproex sodium over placebo were not demonstrated in a fourth study. Further research is needed to determine the optimal use of divalproex sodium for the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia and the long-term benefits, if any, of its use in this patient population.

Pharmacotherapy of suicidal behavior in bipolar disorder

Patients with Bipolar Disorder (BD) are at particularly high risk for both attempted and completed suicides. The period of highest risk for completed suicide is during the 2 years following discharge from a hospitalization. To date, pharmacological studies of suicidal behavior in BD have been quite limited. While strong evidence has been found regarding the anti-suicidal effects of lithium, evidence for such properties in other commonly prescribed medications for BD, including anticonvulsants, SSRIs and anti-psychotics, has been largely unexplored. Considering the high risk of suicidal acts in patients with BD, further research on the pharmacotherapy of suicidal behavior is crucial.

Guidelines for the Treatment of Alzheimer??s Disease from the Italian Association of Psychogeriatrics

A committee of experts from the Italian Association of Psychogeriatrics compiled the following report, which was then approved by a Steering Committee (comprising 20 specialists in neurology, psychiatry or geriatrics) from the Association and by two Alzheimer associations representing patients and families: the Italian Association for Alzheimer's Disease and the Italian Federation for Alzheimer's Disease. The report is based on a comprehensive review of the scientific literature on the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, discusses methodological aspects of dementia management, and details the limitations of current therapies. These guidelines are, in general, consistent with the principles of evidence-based medicine; however, for some controversial or poorly investigated issues, the guidelines integrate scientific evidence with experience and opinions from experts working in the clinical setting. In particular, the clinical experience of experts has been used to define recommendations for starting and interrupting pharmacotherapy, and to critically review evidence about the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions. The principal pharmacotherapeutic interventions covered in the guidelines are acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and tacrine) and memantine. The main non-pharmacological interventions reviewed are memory training, reality orientation therapy, and combined non-pharmacological interventions. Other issues covered are opportunities for Alzheimer's disease prevention, various modalities of care, and the treatment of comorbidities.

GABAergic function in Alzheimer's disease: evidence for dysfunction and potential as a therapeutic target for the treatment of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by disruptions in multiple major neurotransmitters. While many studies have attempted to establish whether GABA is disrupted in AD patients, findings have varied. We review evidence for disruptions in GABA among patients with AD and suggest that the variable findings reflect subtypes of the disease that are possibly manifested clinically by differing behavioural symptoms. GABA, the major inhibitory neurotransmitter, has long been a target for anxiolytics, hypnotic sedatives, and anticonvulsants. We review the clinical use of GABAergic agents in treating persons with AD symptoms. While newer generation GABAergic medications are now available, they have yet to be evaluated among patients with AD.

Pharmacologic management of agitation in Alzheimer's disease

A large body of evidence has accrued that neuropsychiatric disturbances, such as agitation, are extremely common in Alzheimer's disease. These disturbances are associated with considerable morbidity including earlier nursing home admission, more rapid progression, exacerbation of functional and cognitive deficits, and increased caregiver distress. When attention to social or environmental causes, medical conditions, or other triggers of the behavioral disturbance fails to yield improvement, a role for medication may be indicated, whereby the most dominant behavioral target symptoms are matched to the most relevant medication class. Evidence is reviewed for various medication classes in treating agitation in the patient with Alzheimer's disease, and future treatment strategies may be aimed at delaying or preventing such neuropsychiatric disturbances.

Acute effects of gabapentin on laboratory measures of aggressive and escape responses of adult parolees with and without a history of conduct disorder

RATIONALE

The possible role of GABA in human aggression was evaluated by administering gabapentin to subjects with and without a history of conduct disorder and comparing the effects on laboratory measures of aggression and escape.

METHODS

Eighteen male and two female subjects with a history of criminal behavior participated in experimental sessions, which measured aggressive and escape responses. Ten subjects had a history of childhood conduct disorder (CD+) and ten subjects with no history (non-CD controls). Aggression was measured using the Point Subtraction Aggression Paradigm (PSAP), which provided subjects aggressive, escape and monetary reinforced response options.

RESULTS

Acute doses (200, 400 and 800 mg) of gabapentin had similar effects on aggressive responses among CD+ subjects compared to non-CD control subjects. Aggressive responses of CD+ and non-CD control subjects increased at lower gabapentin doses, and decreased at the highest 800 mg gabapentin dose. Gabapentin increased escape responses for both CD+ and non-CD controls CD- subjects at the lowest dose, but then produced dose-related decreases at the two higher doses in both groups. No changes in monetary reinforced responses were observed, indicative of no CNS stimulation or sedation.

CONCLUSIONS

Gabapentin produced similar bitonic effects upon aggressive and escape responses in subjects with and without a history of childhood conduct disorder. This is in marked contrast to prior differential effects of baclofen on aggressive responses between CD+ and non-CD control subjects in a previous study.

Current status of the utilization of antiepileptic treatments in mood, anxiety and aggression: drugs and devices

Interventions that have been utilized to control seizures in people with epilepsy have been employed by the psychiatric community to treat a variety of disorders. The purpose of this review will be to give an overview of the most prominent uses of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and devices like the Vagus Nerve Stimulator (VNS) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) in the treatment of psychiatric disease states. By far, the most prevalent use of these interventions is in the treatment of mood disorders. AEDs have become a mainstay in the effective treatment of Bipolar Affective Disorder (BAD). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of valproic acid for acute mania, and lamotrigine for BAD maintenance therapy. AEDs are also effectively employed in the treatment of anxiety and aggressive disorders. Finally, VNS and TMS are emerging as possibly useful tools in the treatment of more refractory depressive illness.

Valproic acid for agitation in dementia

BACKGROUND

Agitation affects up to 70% of older people with dementia. Valproic acid has been used for the past 10 years to control agitation in dementia, but no systematic review of the effectiveness of this drug has been published to date. The current study examines three randomized, placebo-controlled trials of the effect of valproic acid on older people with dementia who were agitated.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether evidence supports the use of valproic acid in the treatment of agitation of people with dementia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified from a last updated search of the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group on 10 July 2003 using the terms ("agitat*" or "distur*" or "behavi*" or "aggress*") and "valproic" or "valproate" or "divalpro*." This Register contains articles from all major health care databases and many ongoing trials databases and is regularly updated. The reviewers contacted the authors of publications and drug companies manufacturing valproic acid for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized, placebo-controlled trials with concealed allocation where agitation and dementia of participants were assessed

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

1. Two reviewers extracted data from published trials. 2. Odds ratios of average differences were calculated. 3. Only "intention to treat" analyses were included. 4. Analysis compared participants treated with valproic acid with controls.

MAIN RESULTS

Meta-analysis of the pooled results of the included trials could not be performed because of the following problems. In Porsteinsson 2001, although the physicians having direct responsibility for patient care were blinded, a non-blinded physician, who had no direct contact with these physicians, adjusted divalproex sodium dosage on the basis of reports from blinded raters. Therefore, because the physician who controlled therapy knew which patients were receiving divalproex, the trial did not satisfy the criterion of concealed allocation. In Tariot 2001, 54% of the treated patients dropped out compared with 29% of control patients. Of all treated patients, 22% dropped out because of adverse effects, and the study had to be discontinued prematurely. The third trial (Sival 2002) had a cross-over design. No results from the first phase of the study were available, and although the statistical section stated, "the t-test for independent samples is used to analyze the two-period cross-over trial", because the samples were not independent - they are the same patients in the treatment and placebo groups - a question must be raised about the correctness of the analyses. The type of valproate used in the trials varied - one used short-acting sodium valproate, one long-acting divalproex sodium, and the third early-onset acting divalproex sodium. Average doses differed (480mg/d - 1000mg/d), as did duration of therapy (3 wks - 6 wks), and ways of evaluating patients and their response to therapy. A limited meta-analysis, pooling the results concerning adverse effects (Porsteinsson 2001, Tariot 2001) revealed the following: Sedation occurred more frequently in patients treated with valproic acid than in controls Urinary tract infection was more common among patients treated with valproic acid than controls Because of differences in identifying adverse effects it was not possible to pool other observations concerning adverse effects between the two studies that were examined.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

The trials reviewed should be regarded as preliminary. Individual reports suggest that low dose sodium valproate is ineffective in treating agitation among demented patients, and that high dose divalproex sodium is associated with an unacceptable rate of adverse effects. More research on the use of valproate preparations for agitation of people with dementia is needed. On the basis of current evidence, valproate preparations cannot be recommended for the treatment of agitation in dementia.

Valproate therapy for agitation in dementia: open-label extension of a double-blind trial

OBJECTIVE

The authors describe an open-label extension of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of divalproex sodium in 56 nursing home patients with agitation and dementia.

METHODS

Participants (N=46) were treated for 6 weeks in an open fashion with clinically optimal doses of divalproex sodium (range: 250 mg/day-1,500 mg/day; mean: 851 mg/day). Behavior was assessed with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI) by new raters. Safety, tolerability, and laboratory data were obtained regularly.

RESULTS

The mean BPRS Agitation Factor decreased by 3.1 points from baseline; 86% of those completing the open phase were rated as improved on the CGI. These changes were mirrored by changes in other behavior rating scales. Sixty percent of subjects had no side effects; 33% had side effects that were rated as mild. There were no clinically significant changes in laboratory values.

CONCLUSION

Ongoing open-label treatment with divalproex was associated with improvement in measures of agitation. Doses, levels, and tolerability were similar to those in the blinded phase of the study. These findings help confirm and extend the results from the placebo-controlled phase of the trial and suggest that divalproex may be beneficial for some patients with this clinical problem.