Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Complications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard of care for the treatment of several cancers. While these immunotherapies have improved patient outcomes in many clinical settings, they bring accompanying risks of toxicity, specifically immune-related adverse events (irAEs). There is a need for clear, effective guidelines for the management of irAEs during ICI treatment, motivating the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) to convene an expert panel to develop a clinical practice guideline. The panel discussed the recognition and management of single and combination ICI irAEs and ultimately developed evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to assist medical professionals in clinical decision-making and to improve outcomes for patients.

Organ-Specific Immune-Related Adverse Events for PD-1 Antibodies in Lung Cancer Treatment

Anti-PD-1 therapy has revolutionized the clinical treatment of lung cancer. With the increasing number of lung cancer patients being treated, there is also an increase in the number of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) being reported. These irAEs involve multiple organs and systems, mainly manifest as inflammatory side effects, and are different from the adverse events observed with traditional lung cancer treatment. These effects are often mild and treatable and reversible; however, in a few cases the side effects can be severe and lead to termination of immunotherapy. Management involves glucocorticoid-based related immunomodulators, which should be carefully prescribed to balance the efficacy and side effects of the PD-1 antibody treatment. This review will describe the characteristics and mechanisms of irAEs in specific organs, and will serve as a guide to help optimize treatment plans and improve patient outcomes.

Pathologic Manifestations of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Injury in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

CONTEXT.—

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), including cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors and the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, are being increasingly used for treating many advanced malignancies. However, CPI therapy is also associated with gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary adverse effects.

OBJECTIVES.—

To review the adverse effects of CPI therapy on the gastrointestinal tract and hepatobiliary system. To describe histopathologic patterns and discuss differential diagnostic considerations in the diagnosis of CPI injuries.

DATA SOURCES.—

Published peer-reviewed literature in the English language and personal experience in the diagnosis of CPI injuries.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The pathologic manifestations of CPI therapy-induced gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary injury are broad. The patterns of esophageal CPI injury include lymphocytic inflammation and ulcerative esophagitis, while those of gastric injury include chronic active gastritis, lymphocytic gastritis, focal enhancing gastritis, and periglandular inflammation. The duodenal injury may present as duodenitis with villous blunting and granulomas. We also noticed active colitis, microscopic colitis, chronic active colitis, increased apoptosis, ischemic colitis, and nonspecific inflammatory reactive changes in colonic injuries. The reported histologic features of hepatobiliary injuries are panlobular hepatitis, centrilobular necrosis, portal inflammation with bile duct injury, steatosis, nodular regenerative hyperplasia, and secondary sclerosing cholangitis. In summary, we discuss the pathologic features and differential diagnosis of CPI therapy-induced gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary injury. Recognition of CPI injury is important to determine the proper management that often includes cessation of CPI therapy, and administration of steroids or other immunosuppressive agents, based on severity of injury.

A Review of Cancer Immunotherapy Toxicity: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Cancer immunotherapy, which leverages features of the immune system to target neoplastic cells, has revolutionized the treatment of cancer. The use of these therapies has rapidly expanded in the past two decades. Immune checkpoint inhibitors represent one drug class within immunotherapy with its first agent FDA-approved in 2011. Immune checkpoint inhibitors act by disrupting inhibitory signals from neoplastic cells to immune effector cells, allowing activated T-cells to target these neoplastic cells. Unique adverse effects associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors are termed immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) and are usually immunostimulatory in nature. Almost all organ systems may be affected by irAEs including the dermatologic, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, endocrine, and cardiovascular systems. These effects range from mild to life-threatening, and their onset can be delayed several weeks or months. For mild irAEs, symptomatic care is usually sufficient. For higher grade irAEs, discontinuation of therapy and initiation of immunosuppressive therapy may be necessary. The management of patients with irAEs involves multidisciplinary care coordination with respect to the long-term goals the individual patient. Clinicians must be aware of the unique and sometimes fatal toxicologic profiles associated with immunotherapies to ensure prompt diagnosis and appropriate management.

Organ-specific Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy, with Special Reference to Endocrinopathies

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are potent and promising immunotherapeutic agents that are increasingly used for the management of various types of advanced cancers. The widespread approval of this group of drugs simultaneously revealed immune-related adverse events as unique side-effects. Endocrinopathies are one of the most common immune-related adverse events. The precise pathogenic mechanisms for these endocrinopathies are still unclear. Though few of the endocrinopathies are reversible, calling for only symptom control, most are irreversible, requiring multiple long-term hormone replacement therapies. However, in contrast to other organ-specific immune-related adverse events, patients with endocrinopathies can continue their immune checkpoint therapy, provided the hormone replacement therapy is adequate and the symptoms are controlled. Though patients who have developed immune-related adverse events demonstrate superior antitumor activity and overall survival, due to the high morbidity associated with the immune-related adverse events, researchers are trying to uncouple the antitumour activity associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy from the immune-related adverse events, to preserve antitumour activity without adverse events.

Targeting the Gut Microbiome to Mitigate Immunotherapy-Induced Colitis in Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been a transformational advance in cancer therapy in the past decade. However, ICIs can produce immune-related adverse effects (irAEs), which can lead to both morbidity and premature termination of therapy. Recent studies suggest that the gut microbiota and its metabolites affect ICI efficacy and toxicity. Herein, we review such evidence in the context of ICI-induced colitis. In particular, the short-chain fatty acid butyrate, a microbial metabolite, has known protective effects on the intestine. We discuss how the use of dietary prebiotics, which can be metabolized by bacteria to produce butyrate, can be an intriguing new investigational approach to prevent ICI-associated colitis and lead to improved patient outcomes.

Immuno-oncology: a narrative review of gastrointestinal and hepatic toxicities

Vaccines, cytokines, and adoptive cellular therapies (ACT) represent immuno-therapeutic modalities with great development potential, and they are currently approved for the treatment of a limited number of advanced malignancies. The most up-to-date knowledge on the regulation of the anti-cancer immune response has recently led to the development and approval of inhibitors of immune checkpoints, which have produced unprecedented clinical activity in several hard to treat solid malignancies. However, severe adverse events (AEs) represent a limitation to the use of these drugs. Currently approved checkpoint inhibitors block cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), resulted in increased survival of patients with several solid and hematologic malignancies. The most common treatment AEs associated with these drugs are fatigue, rash, and auto-immune/inflammatory reactions. Many of the immune-related AEs are reversible and the strategies for their management include supportive care either with or without treatment withdrawal; nevertheless, in severe cases, hospitalization and treatment with immune suppressants, and/or immunomodulators may be required. Steroid therapy is a critical component of the treatment algorithm; nevertheless, the associated immunosuppression may compromise the antitumor response. This article provides a comprehensive and narrative review of luminal gastrointestinal and hepatic complications, including recommendations for their investigation and management.

Abdominal immune-related adverse events: detection on ultrasonography, CT, MRI and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography

Immune checkpoint inhibitor and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies are associated with a unique spectrum of complications termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The abdomen is the most frequent site of severe irAEs that require hospitalization with life-threatening consequences. Most abdominal irAEs such as enterocolitis, hepatitis, cholangiopathy, cholecystitis, pancreatitis, adrenalitis, and sarcoid-like reaction are initially detected on imaging such as ultrasonography (US), CT, MRI and fusion 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-CT during routine surveillance of cancer therapy. Early recognition and diagnosis of irAEs and immediate management with cessation of immune modulator cancer therapy and institution of immunosuppressive therapy are necessary to avert morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis of irAEs is confirmed by tissue sampling or by follow-up imaging demonstrating resolution. Abdominal radiologists reviewing imaging on patients being treated with anti-cancer immunomodulators should be familiar with the imaging manifestations of irAEs.

Organ-specific Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy, with Special Reference to Endocrinopathies

Collapse

Potential Impacts of Prebiotics and Probiotics in Cancer Prevention

BACKGROUND

Cancer is a serious problem throughout the world. The pathophysiology of cancer is multifactorial and is also related to gut microbiota. Intestinal microbes are the useful resident of the healthy human. They play various aspects of human health including nutritional biotransformation, flushing of the pathogens, toxin neutralization, immune response, and onco-suppression. Disruption in the interactions among the gut microbiota, intestinal epithelium, and the host immune system are associated with gastrointestinal disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, metabolic syndrome, and cancer. Probiotic bacteria (Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp.) have been regarded as beneficial to health and shown to play a significant role in immunomodulation and displayed preventive role against obesity, diabetes, liver disease, inflammatory bowel disease, tumor progression, and cancer.

OBJECTIVE

The involvement of gut microorganisms in cancer development and prevention has been recognized as a balancing factor. The events of dysbiosis emphasize metabolic disorder and carcinogenesis. The gut flora potentiates immunomodulation and minimizes the limitations of usual chemotherapy. The significant role of prebiotics and probiotics on the improvement of immunomodulation and antitumor properties has been considered.

METHODS

I had reviewed the literature on the multidimensional activities of prebiotics and probiotics from the NCBI website database PubMed, Springer Nature, Science Direct (Elsevier), Google Scholar database to search relevant articles. Specifically, I had focused on the role of prebiotics and probiotics in immunomodulation and cancer prevention.

RESULTS

Prebiotics are the nondigestible fermentable sugars that selectively influence the growth of probiotic organisms that exert immunomodulation over the cancerous growth. The oncostatic properties of bacteria are mediated through the recruitment of cytotoxic T cells, natural killer cells, and oxidative stress-induced apoptosis in the tumor microenvironment. Moreover, approaches have also been taken to use probiotics as an adjuvant in cancer therapy.

CONCLUSION

The present review has indicated that dysbiosis is the crucial factor in many pathological situations including cancer. Applications of prebiotics and probiotics exhibit the immune-surveillance as oncostatic effects. These events increase the possibilities of new therapeutic strategies for cancer prevention.

Diagnosis and management of immune-related adverse effects of immune checkpoint therapy in the emergency department

Rapid advances in cancer immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors have led to significantly improved survival. Rapid identification of the toxicity syndromes associated with these therapeutic agents is very important for emergency physicians because the population of patients diagnosed with cancer is increasing and cancer therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors have become the first-line treatment for more and more types of cancer. The emergency medicine literature lags behind rapid advances in oncology, and oncology guidelines for rapid recognition and management of these emerging toxicity syndromes are not familiar to emergency physicians. In this review article, we discuss the clinical presentation and management of immune-related adverse effects during the critical first hours of emergency care. We also suggest a workflow for the recognition and treatment of emergencies arising from serious immune-related adverse effects, including but not limited to colitis, adrenal crisis, myocarditis, pneumonitis, myasthenic crisis, diabetic ketoacidosis, bullous pemphigus, and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Rapid advances in cancer therapy are bringing new diagnostic and therapeutic challenges to emergency providers, and therefore it is crucial to raise awareness and provide guidelines for the management of new treatment-related toxicities.

Side effects and management in immunotherapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, which exert their antitumor effects by targeting suppressive immune molecules, are a class of monoclonal antibody drugs based on certain immune checkpoints. Cancer immunotherapies lead to unique toxicity profiles distinct from the toxicities of other cancer therapies, depending on their mechanism of action. Immune-related adverse events can involve any organ or system. These effects are frequently low grade and reversible, affecting the skin, gastrointestinal tract, liver, endocrine system, and lung most commonly. However, some adverse effects can be severe and life-threatening. Therefore, the effective management of immune-related adverse events and reducing the occurrence of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events are critical in optimizing treatment outcomes. In this review, we summarize the clinical guidelines and the latest studies, and focus on the common toxic effects and management of the adverse events related to anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 or programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand-1 monoclonal antibody drugs, in order to provide better management of immune-related adverse events.

Mechanisms of Immune-Related Complications in Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the prognosis of many cancer patients. Blocking antibodies targeting inhibitory cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 or programmed cell death protein-1 receptors or the programmed cell death ligand-1 have led to long-lasting remissions in patients with even advanced cancers. Main side effects induced by ICIs are inflammatory complications with sometimes severe sequelae for patients. Recent studies have improved our understanding how such immune-related adverse events (irAEs) develop. Here, we summarize the current knowledge of pathomechanisms involved in the de-velopment of irAEs with a particular focus on potential pathways that could be targeted to prevent severe immune-related complications in patients treated with cancer immunotherapy.

Lipopeptide(s) associated with human microbiome as potent cancer drug

Human microbiota comprises of trillions of microbes which have evolved with and continued to live on/ within their human hosts. Different environmental factors and diet have a large impact upon human microbiota population. These microorganisms live in synergy with their hosts and are beneficial to the host in many different ways. Many microorganisms help to fight against human diseases. Cancer is one such diseases which effects a large human population often leading to death. Cancer is also one of the most fatal human diseases killing millions of people world-wide every year. Though many treatment procedures are available but none is 100 % effective in curing cancer. In this review, we seek to understand the role of human microbiota in cancer treatment. Lipopeptide(s) (LPs) produced by different microorganisms can act as efficient drug(s) against cancer. LPs are low molecular weight lipo-proteins that are also known for their anti-cancer activities. As human microbiota belongs to an environment within the host body, a drug prepared using these microorganisms will be easily accepted by the body. This novel approach of using LPs produced by human microbiota can be considered for the much needed change in cancer treatment. Therefore, it is proposed that research should focus on the host-microbe interaction which could pave the way in understanding role played by these microorganisms in cancer treatment.

Trial watch : the gut microbiota as a tool to boost the clinical efficacy of anticancer immunotherapy

Accumulating evidence demonstrates the decisive role of the gut microbiota in determining the effectiveness of anticancer therapeutics such as immunogenic chemotherapy or immune checkpoint blockade in preclinical tumor models, as well as in cancer patients. In synthesis, it appears that a normal intestinal microbiota supports therapeutic anticancer responses, while a dysbiotic microbiota that lacks immunostimulatory bacteria or contains overabundant immunosuppressive species causes treatment failure. These findings have led to the design of clinical trials that evaluate the capacity of modulation of the gut microbiota to synergize with treatment and hence limit tumor progression. Along the lines of this Trial Watch, we discuss the rationale for harnessing the gut microbiome in support of cancer therapy and the progress of recent clinical trials testing this new therapeutic paradigm in cancer patients.

Durvalumab Immunotherapy: Nursing Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events During the Journey of Patients With Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

When resection is not an option, platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been the historic standard of care in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Prognosis remains poor with CRT alone. Durvalumab has shown significant improvement (versus placebo) in progression-free and overall survival in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC without progression following CRT.

OBJECTIVES

This article aims to provide an overview of the efficacy and safety outcomes with durvalumab in patients with stage III NSCLC and identify management strategies for potential adverse events (AEs).

METHODS

A review of published literature and guidelines was performed to evaluate durvalumab clinical outcomes and AE management strategies.

FINDINGS

Durvalumab has established efficacy in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC and is now the standard of care following CRT. Nurses need to be trained to recognize potential immune-related AEs in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Hepatobiliary Adverse Events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used for multiple cancer types. Hepatotoxicity is a reported adverse event of ICI treatment. It can present as asymptomatic elevation of aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase or symptomatic hepatitis with fever, malaise, and even death in rare cases. The diagnosis of ICI-induced hepatitis is made after exclusion of other etiologies based on medical history, laboratory evaluation, and imaging and histological findings. Treatment of ICI-induced hepatitis consists of ICI discontinuation and immunosuppression in severe cases. Pancreatic injury as asymptomatic lipase elevation or acute pancreatitis-like disease with abdominal pain and evidence on imaging has been documented as a toxicity of ICI therapy. Appropriate treatment of pancreatitis still needs further investigation. Few cases, reports, and series documented cholecystitis and cholangitis as possible adverse events related to ICI therapy as well.

Imaging of Adverse Events Related to Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is becoming standard of practice for an increasing number of cancer types. ICIs enhance T-cell action against the cancer cells. By unbalancing the immune system ICIs may cause dysimmune toxicities, a series of disorders broadly defined immune-related adverse events (irAEs). IrAEs may affect any organ or apparatus and most frequently involve skin, colon, endocrine organs, liver, and lungs. Early identification and appropriate treatment of irAEs can improve patient outcome. The paper aims at reviewing mechanisms of the occurrence of irAEs, the importance of a proper diagnosis and the main pillars of therapy. To provide effective guidance to the comprehension of major irAEs imaging findings will be reviewed.

A review of cancer immunotherapy toxicity

Cancer immunotherapies, including checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive cell therapy, manipulate the immune system to recognize and attack cancer cells. These therapies have the potential to induce durable responses in multiple solid and hematologic malignancies and thus have transformed treatment algorithms for numerous tumor types. Cancer immunotherapies lead to unique toxicity profiles distinct from the toxicities of other cancer therapies, depending on their mechanism of action. These toxicities often require specific management, which can include steroids and immune-modulating therapy and for which consensus guidelines have been published. This review will focus on the toxicities of checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T cells, including pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management.

Morphological spectrum of immune check-point inhibitor therapy-associated gastritis

AIMS

Immune check-point inhibitors are frequently used in the treatment of a variety of solid tumours. The mechanism of action of these drugs involves up-regulation of cytotoxic T cells, which can lead to a lack of self-tolerance and immune-related adverse events, including those involving the gastrointestinal tract. This study was performed to characterise the histological features of immune check-point inhibitor therapy-associated gastritis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Gastric biopsies from patients on immune check-point inhibitor therapy with clinical suspicion of drug-associated gastrointestinal injury were identified. The predominant histological pattern of injury, distribution of injury, degree of tissue eosinophilia and prominence of apoptosis were recorded. Presenting symptoms, treatment and follow-up data were obtained by medical chart review. The 12 patients included in the study group were treated with ipilimumab, nivolumab or pembrolizumab for a variety of tumours. Symptoms at presentation included nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea. Chronic active gastritis with intra-epithelial lymphocytosis and prominent apoptosis was seen in eight of 12 patients, and was the most useful combination for the diagnosis of drug-induced gastritis in these patients. Four patients showed focal enhancing gastritis with a lymphohistiocytic cuff around inflamed glands reminiscent of Crohn's disease. One of those four patients was homozygous for the ATG16L1 Crohn's disease-associated gene variant, but had no history of inflammatory bowel disease. Ten patients responded to medication withdrawal and steroid therapy, while two required treatment with infliximab.

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness of the morphological spectrum of immune check-point inhibitor therapy-associated gastritis is important for the accurate diagnosis and prompt management of these patients.

Immune-mediated adverse effects of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and their management in cancer

Within the past decade, immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs), including anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), anti-programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1), and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibodies, are undoubtfully the most remarkable advances in cancer therapy. The immune responses are modulated by these ICPIs via blocking the inhibitory PD-1/PD-L1 path and result in immune activation in the suppressive microenvironment of the tumor. While ICPIs result in benefits for numerous patients with malignancy and lead to disease control and survival, toxicity and safety problems have emerged as well. Although immune mediated adverse effects due to ICPIs could involve any organ system, skin, endocrine glands, and gastrointestinal tract, are one of the most commonly affected. Fortunately, in most of the cases, these immune‑mediated adverse effects (imAEs) are manageable, while in some cases these toxicities are fulminant and fatal and lead to the withdrawal of treatment. Numerous attempts have been started and are continuing to reduce the incidence rate of imAEs. Further studies are required for a better understanding of these imAEs, decrease the occurrence, and lighten the severity. In this work, we overview the imAEs and also, highlight the most important aspects of the imAEs management.

Recognition and management of the gastrointestinal and hepatic immune-related adverse events

Immunotherapy is revolutionizing the treatment paradigm for a broad spectrum of malignancies. However, the immune checkpoint inhibitors also cause a unique set of toxicities. In the digestive system, this has consisted for the most part as colitis and hepatotoxicity, but also include less-common manifestations. Baseline screening, early identification, timely diagnosis, rapid and adequate treatment can significantly minimize the toxicity of immunotherapy and improve prognosis. This article provides a comprehensive review of gastrointestinal and hepatic immune-related toxicities, including incidence, mechanism, clinical manifestation, diagnosis, treatment, and guidelines for resumption of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Gastrointestinal adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized cancer therapy and is now the standard treatment for several different types of cancer, supported by favorable outcomes and good tolerance. However, it is linked to multiple immune manifestations, referred to as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). These adverse events frequently affect the skin, colon, endocrine glands, lungs, and liver. The gastrointestinal system is one of the most commonly affected organ systems and is responsible for the most frequent emergency visits resulting from irAEs. However, because immune checkpoint inhibitors are a recent addition to our arsenal of cancer drugs, many health-care providers remain unfamiliar with the management of irAEs. Gastroenterologists involved in the treatment of oncology patients who have received checkpoint inhibitors are currently encountering cases of abdominal pain, diarrhea, and other nonspecific symptoms that may be challenging to manage. This article reviews the gastrointestinal, hepatic, and pancreatic toxicities of checkpoint inhibitors and provides an approach to their diagnosis and recommended workup. It also highlights the management of irAEs according to their toxicity grading and specifically discusses the instances in which corticosteroids should be administered and/or the immune checkpoint inhibitors should be withheld.

[Toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors and their management]

Immunotherapeutic strategies, notably immune checkpoint inhibitors, have become a standard of care for the treatment of advanced cancers, with a growing spectrum of activity. These monoclonal antibodies target the co-inhibitory signals between tumor cells or antigen-presenting cells and T cells, thereby enhancing antitumour T cell activity. However, the occurrence of immune-related adverse events, that can affect all organ-system, represents a major limiting factor to the clinical development of these antibodies. Management of such toxicity requires a close collaboration between oncologists and organ-specialists, by using glucocorticoids and/or other immunosuppressive therapies, with the common objective not alter anti-tumor response.

Immunotherapy-induced endocrinopathies: assessment, management and monitoring

Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has transformed the treatment of cancer, but frequently results in immune-mediated adverse events affecting multiple organs, amongst which endocrine adverse events are frequent. The patterns of endocrine adverse events differ between inhibitors of the CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 pathways, but most frequently involve the thyroid and pituitary with insulin deficient diabetes also emerging as an important adverse event. These frequently result in long-lasting hormone deficiency requiring replacement. This review explores the mechanism of action of checkpoint inhibitors and details the expected endocrine adverse events and typical presentations. The effect of high-dose glucocorticoids therapy to treat nonendocrine adverse events is also discussed.

Toxicity of tumor immune checkpoint inhibitors-more attention should be paid

In recent years, immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has achieved amazing results in the treatment of lung cancer, melanoma, renal clear cell carcinoma and other malignant tumors. Although ICIs have achieved significant efficacy in tumor treatment, the immune-related adverse events (irAEs) caused by non-specific immune activation of ICIs can directly affect the result of treatment, even threaten the life of patients. The most common form of irAEs involve the skin, lung, colon, liver and endocrine organs. However, it is noticeable that although irAEs of some organs are more common, actually any organ and tissue are likely to be affected, because of non-specific activation of the immune system. Other tissues and organs, though rare, can be more severe and even fatal, such as neurological disorders and myocarditis. Therefore, effective management of irAEs is of great importance for the efficacy of immunotherapy. This review is focused on the morbidity, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment of tumor immune toxic effects.

Toxicities associated with checkpoint inhibitors-an overview

Immunotherapy has an increasing role in the management of cancer, both in metastatic disease and as an adjuvant therapy. However, sensitization of the immune system with checkpoint inhibitors comes with a unique side effect profile. Full appreciation of this can take some time to emerge as some adverse events are rare, or can be subtle and potentially overlooked. Clinician awareness of these side effects can be particularly important in patients with pre-existing autoimmune conditions. Here we describe common symptoms and diagnostic strategies for organ-specific side effects of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy agents.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related luminal GI adverse events

The early promising results of the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of selected malignancies has ushered a new era in cancer research and the development of treatment options. With the increasing use of this class of medications, a wide array of adverse events is becoming evident, many of which will be encountered by the gastroenterologist. The second most common adverse event associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors involves the GI tract and includes diarrhea and colitis. These are experienced by up to 50% of patients on these agents. The severity of these events varies greatly and may range from mild to fatal. Therefore, it is important that the gastroenterologist is aware of the spectrum of potential GI adverse events. For this review, we conducted an extensive literature search and compiled all relevant information pertaining to the luminal GI tract. The presentation, approach to the patient with luminal GI adverse reactions, risk stratification, management, challenging populations, endoscopic considerations and findings, and histologic findings are discussed in this review.

Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction in a patient with metastatic gastro-oesophageal junction cancer receiving treatment with pembrolizumab

Acute gastrointestinal (GI) immune-related adverse events (irAE) are commonly reported by patients with cancer undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI); however chronic irAEs are rare. We present a case of a 71-year-old woman with metastatic gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) adenocarcinoma who developed delayed-onset chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO) while receiving second-line pembrolizumab. Repeated CT scans of the abdomen/pelvis found no small bowel obstruction, and evaluations for bowel inflammation, infection and paraneoplastic syndrome were negative. Bowel rest and glucocorticoids were associated with transient symptom resolution; however, symptoms recurred within 1 month. The patient was ultimately supported with total parenteral nutrition and intestinal motility agents. After 4 months, the GOJ cancer remained stable with no signs of progression. As CPI use expands, the incidence of rare irAEs, such as CIPO, may increase.

Immunotoxicity from checkpoint inhibitor therapy: clinical features and underlying mechanisms

Immune checkpoint inhibition with monoclonal antibodies is becoming increasingly commonplace in cancer medicine, having contributed to a widening of therapeutic options across oncological indications. Disruption of immune tolerance is the key mechanism of action of checkpoint inhibitors and although immune-related adverse events are a typical class effect of these compounds, the relationship between toxicity and response is not fully understood. Awareness and vigilance are paramount in recognizing potentially life-threatening toxicities and managing them in a timely manner. In this review article, we provide an overview of the clinical features, pathological findings and management principles of common immune-related toxicities, attempting to provide mechanistic insight into an increasingly common complication of cancer therapy.

Autoimmune Effects of Lung Cancer Immunotherapy Revealed by Data-Driven Analysis on a Nationwide Cohort

The autoimmune adverse effects of lung cancer immunotherapy are not fully understood at the population level. Using observational data from commercial health insurance claims, we compared autoimmune diseases risk of immune checkpoint inhibitors (including pembrolizumab and nivolumab) and that of chemotherapy using the matching method. By 6 months after treatment initialization, the cumulative incidence of new autoimmune diseases among patients receiving immunotherapy was 13.13% (95% confidence interval (CI), 10.79-15.50%) and that of the matched chemotherapy patients was 6.65% (95% CI, 5.79-7.50%), constituting a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.97 (95% CI, 1.58-2.48). Both pembrolizumab (HR = 2.06 (95% CI, 1.20-3.65), P = 0.0032) and nivolumab (HR = 1.76 (95% CI, 1.39-2.24), P < 0.0001) were associated with higher risks of developing autoimmune diseases, especially for hypothyroidism (P < 0.0001). Our findings suggest the need to monitor autoimmune side effects of immunotherapy.

Impact of the gut microbiota on immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated toxicities

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment of patients with advanced cancers. However, the majority of patients do not respond or develop early progressive disease. A substantial number also develop immune-mediated toxicities that may lead to early treatment discontinuation. Gastrointestinal toxicities in the form of diarrhea and colitis are common and may resemble that observed in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Alterations in the gut microbiota are thought to play an important role in mediating the intestinal inflammation that is associated with immune-mediated colitis. In this review, the authors' objective is to provide an overview of the gastrointestinal and hepatic toxicities that can be seen with ICIs and discuss the interactions between gut microbiota and the immune response. The authors also highlight the potential role for fecal microbial transfer (FMT) as an approach to improve therapeutic efficacy and decrease toxicity.

Fusobacterium nucleatum-positive colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is an important threat to human health and the fourth leading cause of mortality worldwide. Accumulating evidence indicates that the composition of the intestinal flora is associated with the occurrence of CRC. Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), one of the highly enriched bacteria in CRC tissues, invades the mucosa with adhesion factors and virulence proteins, interacts with the host immune system and promotes the occurrence and development of CRC and chemoresistance. Fn infection is prevalent in human colorectal carcinoma, although the infection rate varies in different regions. Fn may be used as a prognostic indicator of CRC. It is important to understand the multi-pathway carcinogenic mechanisms associated with CRC in order to develop novel antibacterial drugs against Fn. The current review summarizes the role of Fn and relevant research concerning CRC published in recent years, focusing on Fn infection in CRC, pathogenesis of Fn, Fn-positive CRC treatment, screening and prevention strategies against Fn-positive CRC.

A Review of Immune-Mediated Adverse Events in Melanoma

The use of checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy has transformed the treatment landscape for melanoma as well as many other cancer types. With the ability to potentiate tumor-specific immune responses, these agents can result in durable tumor control. However, this activation of the immune system can lead to a unique constellation of side effects, distinct from other cancer therapies, collectively termed immune-mediated adverse events (irAEs). This review will focus on irAEs and guidelines for management related to the most clinically relevant checkpoint inhibitors, those that target programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4).

Macroangiopathy is a positive predictive factor for response to immunotherapy

Immunotherapies demand for predictive biomarkers to avoid unnecessary adverse effects and costs. Analytic morphomics is the technique to use body composition measures as imaging biomarkers for underlying pathophysiology to predict prognosis or outcome to therapy. We investigated different body composition measures to predict response to immunotherapy. This IRB approved retrospective analysis encompassed 147 patients with ipilimumab therapy. Degree of macroangiopathy was quantified with the newly defined total plaque index (TPI), i.e. the body height corrected sum of the soft and hard plaque volume of the infrarenal aorta on portalvenous CT scans. Furthermore, mean psoas density (MPD), different adipose tissue parameters as well as degree of cerebral microangiopathy were extracted from the imaging data. Subsequent multivariate Cox regression analysis encompassed TPI, MPD, serum LDH, S100B, age, gender, number of immunotherapy cycles as well as extent of distant metastases. TPI and MPD correlated positively with PFS in multivariate analysis (p = 0.03 and p = 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, single visceral organ and/or soft tissue involvement significantly decreased progression risk (p = 0.01), whereas increased S100B level showed a trend towards PFS shortening (p = 0.05). In conclusion, degree of macroangiopathy and sarcopenia were independent predictors for outcome to immunotherapy and of equivalent significance compared to other clinical biomarkers.

Management of Adverse Events in Cancer Patients Treated With PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade: Focus on Asian Populations

The interaction between programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) induces exhaustions of cytotoxic lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment, which facilitates tumor immune evasion. PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy, which prevents the receptors and ligands from binding to each other, disrupts the T-cell exhaustion signaling, thereby increasing antitumor immunity. Inspiringly, it has revolutionized the treatment of many different types of cancers including non-small-cell lung carcinoma, melanoma, lymphoma, and so on. However, with the intention of generating an antitumor immune response, PD-1/PD-L1 blockade may also lead to a spectrum of side effects. The profile of adverse events (AEs) of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade is not exactly the same with other immune checkpoint blockades, such as blockade of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4. Although cutaneous, gastrointestinal, and pulmonary systems are common victims, AEs of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade might occur in any other organ system of the human body. These toxicities can be life-threatening if not managed promptly, and proper treatment intervention is imperative for optimal control and prevention of severe damage. Currently, clinical practice for the management of AEs in PD-1/PD-L1 blockade remains sporadic and variable. The majority of initial clinical trials were carried out in Caucasians. The trials of multiple races usually included a small portion of Asian participants, and results were calculated and interpreted for the entire included subjects without any race-specific conclusions. Therefore, the information on PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in Asians is far from systematic or comprehensive. Recently, as the results of clinical trials of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents in Asian populations have been gradually released, we summarized current evidence with a specific focus on the Asian population, hoping to outline strategies and offer guidance on the management of AEs in cancer patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in the Asian world.

Gut Microbiota Shapes the Efficiency of Cancer Therapy

Systems biology provides an opportunity to discover the role that gut microbiota play in almost all aspects of human health. Existing evidence supports the hypothesis that gut microbiota is closely related to the pharmacological effects of chemical therapy and novel targeted immunotherapy. Gut microbiota shapes the efficiency of drugs through several key mechanisms: metabolism, immunomodulation, translocation, enzymatic degradation, reduction of diversity, and ecological variability. Therefore, gut microbiota have emerged as a novel target to enhance the efficacy and reduce the toxicity and adverse effects of cancer therapy. There is growing evidence to show that cancer therapy perturbs the host immune response and results in dysbiosis of the immune system, which then influences the efficiency of the therapy. Studies suggest that gut microbes play a significant role in cancer therapy by modulating drug efficacy, abolishing the anticancer effect, and mediating toxicity. In this review, we outline the role of gut microbiota in modulating cancer therapy and the implications for improving the efficacy of chemotherapy and immunotherapy in clinical practice. We also summarize the current limitations of the safety and effectiveness of probiotics in cancer therapies such as personalized cancer therapy.

Immune-Related Adverse Events: A Case-Based Approach

Immunotherapy has heralded the advent of a new era in oncology. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) enhance anti-tumor immunity, thereby reinvigorating a patient's immune system to fight cancer. While therapy with this class of agents has resulted in improved clinical outcomes for patients with multiple tumor types, a broad spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) may affect any organ system, with variable clinical presentations. Prompt recognition and management of irAEs are associated with improved irAE outcomes, and represents an important new clinical challenge for practicing oncologists. Herein, we provide a comprehensive case-based review of the most common and clinically-important irAEs, focussing on epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and management. We also examine future strategies that may provide meaningful insights into the prevention and management of irAEs.

Nivolumab-induced immune-mediated colitis: an ulcerative colitis look-alike-report of new cases and review of the literature

PURPOSE

Nivolumab, a monoclonal antibody-targeting programmed cell death protein-1, is being increasingly used for the treatment of some advanced neoplasms. Several of its adverse effects are a result of the upregulation of T cells, with colitis as one of the most severe, and a challenging differential diagnosis with ulcerative colitis. However, few real-life clinical practice cases have been reported beyond trials. Our aim was to report a series of new cases, reviewing previously communicated endoscopic-proven nivolumab-induced colitis.

METHOD

All patients treated with nivolumab in three university centers were identified and those who developed immune-mediated colitis (defined as the presence of diarrhea and evidence of colitis demonstrated by colonoscopy) were described. Additionally, a review of case reports of nivolumab-induced colitis reported in the literature up to March 2018 was performed.

RESULTS

Six new cases of nivolumab-induced colitis and 13 previously reported cases out of randomized clinical trials are described. Colonoscopy showed a mucosal pattern mimicking ulcerative colitis in a large proportion of patients. Clostridium difficile superinfection was observed in two out of 19 cases. All but three patients definitively discontinued nivolumab therapy. Most patients were initially managed with oral or intravenous corticosteroids, but five of them required rescue therapy with infliximab.

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab-induced colitis may mimic ulcerative colitis. Steroid therapy (oral or intravenously) is often efficient, but one-fourth of patients need rescue therapy with anti-TNF. Intestinal superinfection with Clostridium difficile or cytomegalovirus should be ruled out before starting immunosuppressive therapy.

Upper gastrointestinal symptoms and associated endoscopic and histological features in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated effectiveness in treating many malignancies. Gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events are commonly reported; however, few reports describe upper GI tract toxic effects. We aimed to describe clinical features of upper GI injury related to ICI. Methods: We studied consecutive patients who received ICIs between April 2011 and March 2018 and developed upper GI symptoms requiring esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Results: Sixty patients developed upper GI symptoms between ICI initiation and 6 months after the last infusion. Among patients who had both EGD and colonoscopy (n = 38), 21 had endoscopic evidence of inflammation involving both the upper and lower GI tract. Overall, histological signs of inflammation of the stomach were evident in 83% of patients, but inflammation of the duodenum in 38%. Total of 42 patients had other risk factors of gastritis, i.e., chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Only isolated gastric inflammation was seen on endoscopy in patients without these risk factors. The rates of ulceration were similar in the cohorts with and without other risk factors for gastritis. Isolated upper GI inflammation was related to anti-PD-1/L1 in 47% of patients. Immunosuppressive therapy in our cohort with upper GI toxicity consisted of steroids (42%) and infliximab or vedolizumab (23%). Most isolated upper GI symptoms were treated with proton pump inhibitors (65%) or H₂ blockers (35%). Conclusion: We observed a correlation between ICI use and onset of upper GI inflammation even when other risk factors were excluded. Gastric involvement was evident more often than duodenal involvement on endoscopic and histological level.

[Adverse effects of immunotherapy : Clinical aspects, radiological and nuclear medicine results]

BACKGROUND

The increasing use of immunotherapy in oncology increases the need for radiologic evaluation of frequent and severe immune-related adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

Determination of the incidence and manifestation of radiologic and nuclear medicine findings of immune-related adverse events.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Literature review of clinical and imaging findings of immune-related adverse events induced by the immune checkpoint inhibitors ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Findings are illustrated with pictorial examples and contrasted to other relevant differential diagnoses.

RESULTS

The most frequent imaging manifestations are colitis, hepatitis, pancreatitis, hypophysitis, pneumonitis, arthritis and sarcoid-like lymphadenopathy. Severe to life-threatening complications may result from colitis, pneumonitis and hypophysitis. A clear differentiation from other autoimmune diseases and discrimination of immune-related and infectious pulmonary findings can be very difficult and need close multidisciplinary collaboration.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of clinical and imaging findings of adverse events induced by immunotherapy is essential for timely and adequate therapeutic decisions. In addition to staging and follow-up imaging, identification and monitoring of immune-related adverse events adds to the radiologic responsibility in oncologic care.

Nivolumab-induced hepatitis: A rare side effect of an immune check point inhibitor

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have ushered in a new era in cancer management. Nivolumab is a human immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) activity by binding to the PD-1 receptor. This inhibits suppression of the T-cell activity, which can in turn cause increased killing of cancer cells. This alteration in the activity of the T cells can cause them to lose their ability to identify host cells and leads to immune-related adverse effects (irAE). Nivolumab-induced hepatotoxicity is rare and accounts for 3-6% of all irAE. We present a case of nivolumab-induced hepatitis. A woman who was treated for recurrent renal cell carcinoma presented with hepatitis. Workup for other causes was negative and the hepatitis was attributed to the administration of nivolumab. She was started on oral steroids followed which she initially improved. However, she later presented with massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to gastroduodenal ulcers and subsequently developed acute tubular necrosis and passed from the complications. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have proven to be a promising approach in the management of a wide array of neoplasms by immunomodulation. As these agents are becoming standard of therapy in the management of cancers, a heightened vigilance in the diagnosis of irAE is warranted. With heightened vigilance, early recognition can lead to decreased mortality and morbidity.

Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities, Version 1.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The aim of the NCCN Guidelines for Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities is to provide guidance on the management of immune-related adverse events resulting from cancer immunotherapy. The NCCN Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities Panel is an interdisciplinary group of representatives from NCCN Member Institutions and ASCO, consisting of medical and hematologic oncologists with expertise in a wide array of disease sites, and experts from the fields of dermatology, gastroenterology, neuro-oncology, nephrology, emergency medicine, cardiology, oncology nursing, and patient advocacy. Several panel representatives are members of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC). The initial version of the NCCN Guidelines was designed in general alignment with recommendations published by ASCO and SITC. The content featured in this issue is an excerpt of the recommendations for managing toxicity related to immune checkpoint blockade and a review of existing evidence. For the full version of the NCCN Guidelines, including recommendations for managing toxicities related to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, visitNCCN.org.

Safety and Tolerability of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (PD-1 and PD-L1) in Cancer

Immunotherapy has emerged in recent years and has revolutionized the treatment of cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, including anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) agents, are the first of this new generation of treatments. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents target immune cells by blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. This blockade leads to enhancement of the immune system and therefore restores the tumour-induced immune deficiency selectively in the tumour microenvironment. However, this shift in the balance of the immune system can also produce adverse effects that involve multiple organs. The pattern of toxicity is different from traditional chemotherapy agents or targeted therapy, and there is still little experience in recognizing and managing it. Thus, toxicity constitutes a real clinical management challenge and any new alteration should be suspected of being treatment-related. The most common toxicities occur in the skin, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, and endocrine, musculoskeletal, renal, nervous, haematologic, cardiovascular and ocular systems. Immune-mediated toxic effects are usually manageable, but toxicities may sometimes lead to treatment withdrawal, and even fulminant and fatal events can occur. Oncologists need to collaborate with internists, clinical immunologists and other specialists to understand, manage and prevent toxicity derived from immunotherapy. This review focuses on the mechanisms of toxicity of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents, and its diagnosis and management.

Severe toxicity from checkpoint protein inhibitors: What intensive care physicians need to know?

Checkpoint protein inhibitor antibodies (CPI), including cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitors (ipilimumab, tremelimumab) and the programmed cell death protein 1 pathway/programmed cell death protein 1 ligand inhibitors (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, durvalumab, atezolizumab), have entered routine practice for the treatment of many cancers. They improve the outcome for many cancers, and more patients will be treated with CPI in the future. Although CPI can lead to adverse events (AE) less frequently than for chemotherapy, their use can require intensive care unit admission in case of severe immune-related adverse events (IrAE). Moreover, some of these events, particularly late events, are poorly documented, so a high level of suspicion should be maintained for patients receiving CPI. Intensivists should be aware in general of the known complications and appropriate management of these AE. Nevertheless, a multidisciplinary collaboration remains essential for their diagnosis and management. This review described the most severe complications related to CPI.

Intestinal microbiota predicts lung cancer patients at risk of immune-related diarrhea

AIM

Previous studies showed that some patients after the treatment of anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD-1) antibodies experienced immune-related diarrhea. In this study, we aim to explore the association between intestinal microbiota and immune-related diarrhea.

METHODS

We obtained the fecal samples of 26 advanced lung cancer patients before the first dose of anti-PD-1 antibodies.

RESULTS

Eight of 26 patients experienced diarrhea after the treatment of anti-PD-1 antibodies. At the phylum level, our study demonstrated that Bacteroidetes were higher in diarrhea-free (D-F) patients, while Firmicutes were lower. Bacteroides and Parabacteroides belonging to Bacteroidetes phylum and Phascolarctobacterium of Firmicutes phylum were more abundant in D-F patients. Whereas, Veillonella of Proteobacteria phylum was lower in D-F patients.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights that intestinal microbiota variation is correlated with the subsequent development of immune-related diarrhea.

Gross and microscopic changes of liver neoplasms and background hepatic structures following neoadjuvant therapy

Liver transplantation is a surgical option with curative intent used in the management of some cases of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma (hilar, rarely intrahepatic). A number of different therapeutic modalities including ablative techniques, arterially directed therapies, radiation and chemotherapy are used in the neoadjuvant setting prior to liver transplantation with the goals of preventing tumour progression, decreasing post-transplant recurrence and possibly downstaging patients with tumour burden beyond what is acceptable by current transplant criteria. Pathologists evaluating hepatic explants must be aware of these neoadjuvant therapies and the alterations induced by them in both tumourous and non-tumourous tissue. In this review, we discuss common neoadjuvant therapies used in in this setting, as well as the gross and microscopic changes induced by these presurgical treatments within hepatic neoplasms as well as the background hepatic parenchyma and nearby structures. Select secondary tumours involving the liver which are pretreated will also be discussed. Finally, proper reporting of these changes will be mentioned.