Targeting beta-adrenergic receptor pathways in melanoma: how stress modulates oncogenic immunity

The intricate pathways of the sympathetic nervous system hold an inherently protective role in the setting of acute stress. This is achieved through dynamic immunomodulatory and neurobiological networks. However, excessive and chronic exposure to these stress-induced stimuli appears to cause physiologic dysfunction through several mechanisms that may impair psychosocial, neurologic, and immunologic health. Numerous preclinical observations have identified the beta-2 adrenergic receptor (β2-AR) subtype to possess the strongest impact on immune dysfunction in the setting of chronic stressful stimuli. This prolonged expression of β2-ARs appears to suppress immune surveillance and promote tumorigenesis within multiple cancer types. This occurs through several pathways, including (1) decreasing the frequency and function of CD8 + T-cells infiltrating the tumor microenvironment (TME) via inhibition of metabolic reprogramming during T cell activation, and (2) establishing an immunosuppressive profile within the TME including promotion of an exhausted T cell phenotype while simultaneously enhancing local and paracrine metastatic potential. The use of nonselective β-AR antagonists appears to reverse many chronic stress-induced tumorigenic pathways and may also provide an additive therapeutic benefit for various immune checkpoint modulating agents including commonly utilized immune checkpoint inhibitors. Here we review the translational and clinical observations highlighting the foundational hypotheses that chronic stress-induced β-AR signaling promotes a pro-tumoral immunophenotype and that blockade of these pathways may augment the therapeutic response of immune checkpoint inhibition within the scope of melanoma.

Optimal Practices for Suspected Nodal Melanoma-The Role of the General Surgeon

This Viewpoint describes results of trials on neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy for patients with metastatic melanoma and recommends increased use of this approach.

Plasma Proteome-Based Test for First-Line Treatment Selection in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Current guidelines for the management of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver mutations recommend checkpoint immunotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. This approach fails to account for individual patient variability and host immune factors and often results in less-than-ideal outcomes. To address the limitations of the current guidelines, we developed and subsequently blindly validated a machine learning algorithm using pretreatment plasma proteomic profiles for personalized treatment decisions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a multicenter observational trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04056247) of patients undergoing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based therapy (n = 540) and an additional patient cohort receiving chemotherapy (n = 85) who consented to pretreatment plasma and clinical data collection. Plasma proteome profiling was performed using SomaScan Assay v4.1.

RESULTS

Our test demonstrates a strong association between model output and clinical benefit (CB) from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based treatments, evidenced by high concordance between predicted and observed CB (R2 = 0.98, P < .001). The test categorizes patients as either PROphet-positive or PROphet-negative and further stratifies patient outcomes beyond PD-L1 expression levels. The test successfully differentiates between PROphet-negative patients exhibiting high tumor PD-L1 levels (≥50%) who have enhanced overall survival when treated with a combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy compared with immunotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.23 [95% CI, 0.1 to 0.51], P = .0003). By contrast, PROphet-positive patients show comparable outcomes when treated with immunotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.42 to 1.44], P = .424).

CONCLUSION

Plasma proteome-based testing of individual patients, in combination with standard PD-L1 testing, distinguishes patient subsets with distinct differences in outcomes from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based therapies. These data suggest that this approach can improve the precision of first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC.

Expert consensus guidelines on management and best practices for tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte cell therapy

Adoptive cell therapy with autologous, ex vivo-expanded, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is being investigated for treatment of solid tumors and has shown robust responses in clinical trials. Based on the encouraging efficacy, tolerable safety profile, and advancements in a central manufacturing process, lifileucel is now the first US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved TIL cell therapy product. To this end, treatment management and delivery practice guidance is needed to ensure successful integration of this modality into clinical care. This review includes clinical and toxicity management guidelines pertaining to the TIL cell therapy regimen prepared by the TIL Working Group, composed of internationally recognized hematologists and oncologists with expertize in TIL cell therapy, and relates to patient care and operational aspects. Expert consensus recommendations for patient management, including patient eligibility, screening tests, and clinical and toxicity management with TIL cell therapy, including tumor tissue procurement surgery, non-myeloablative lymphodepletion, TIL infusion, and IL-2 administration, are discussed in the context of potential standard of care TIL use. These recommendations provide practical guidelines for optimal clinical management during administration of the TIL cell therapy regimen, and recognition of subsequent management of toxicities. These guidelines are focused on multidisciplinary teams of physicians, nurses, and stakeholders involved in the care of these patients.

The impact of cancer metastases on COVID-19 outcomes: A COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium registry-based retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 can have a particularly detrimental effect on patients with cancer, but no studies to date have examined if the presence, or site, of metastatic cancer is related to COVID-19 outcomes.

METHODS

Using the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry, the authors identified 10,065 patients with COVID-19 and cancer (2325 with and 7740 without metastasis at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis). The primary ordinal outcome was COVID-19 severity: not hospitalized, hospitalized but did not receive supplemental O2 , hospitalized and received supplemental O2 , admitted to an intensive care unit, received mechanical ventilation, or died from any cause. The authors used ordinal logistic regression models to compare COVID-19 severity by presence and specific site of metastatic cancer. They used logistic regression models to assess 30-day all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Compared to patients without metastasis, patients with metastases have increased hospitalization rates (59% vs. 49%) and higher 30 day mortality (18% vs. 9%). Patients with metastasis to bone, lung, liver, lymph nodes, and brain have significantly higher COVID-19 severity (adjusted odds ratios [ORs], 1.38, 1.59, 1.38, 1.00, and 2.21) compared to patients without metastases at those sites. Patients with metastasis to the lung have significantly higher odds of 30-day mortality (adjusted OR, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.00) when adjusting for COVID-19 severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with metastatic cancer, especially with metastasis to the brain, are more likely to have severe outcomes after COVID-19 whereas patients with metastasis to the lung, compared to patients with cancer metastasis to other sites, have the highest 30-day mortality after COVID-19.

Developing Folate-Conjugated miR-34a Therapeutic for Prostate Cancer: Challenges and Promises

Prostate cancer (PCa) remains a common cancer with high mortality in men due to its heterogeneity and the emergence of drug resistance. A critical factor contributing to its lethality is the presence of prostate cancer stem cells (PCSCs), which can self-renew, long-term propagate tumors, and mediate treatment resistance. MicroRNA-34a (miR-34a) has shown promise as an anti-PCSC therapeutic by targeting critical molecules involved in cancer stem cell (CSC) survival and functions. Despite extensive efforts, the development of miR-34a therapeutics still faces challenges, including non-specific delivery and delivery-associated toxicity. One emerging delivery approach is ligand-mediated conjugation, aiming to achieve specific delivery of miR-34a to cancer cells, thereby enhancing efficacy while minimizing toxicity. Folate-conjugated miR-34a (folate-miR-34a) has demonstrated promising anti-tumor efficacy in breast and lung cancers by targeting folate receptor α (FOLR1). Here, we first show that miR-34a, a TP53 transcriptional target, is reduced in PCa that harbors TP53 loss or mutations and that miR-34a mimic, when transfected into PCa cells, downregulated multiple miR-34a targets and inhibited cell growth. When exploring the therapeutic potential of folate-miR-34a, we found that folate-miR-34a exhibited impressive inhibitory effects on breast, ovarian, and cervical cancer cells but showed minimal effects on and targeted delivery to PCa cells due to a lack of appreciable expression of FOLR1 in PCa cells. Folate-miR-34a also did not display any apparent effect on PCa cells expressing prostate-specific membrane antigen (PMSA) despite the reported folate's binding capability to PSMA. These results highlight challenges in the specific delivery of folate-miR-34a to PCa due to a lack of target (receptor) expression. Our study offers novel insights into the challenges and promises within the field and casts light on the development of ligand-conjugated miR-34a therapeutics for PCa.

Developing folate-conjugated miR-34a therapeutic for prostate cancer treatment: Challenges and promises

Prostate cancer (PCa) remains a common cancer with high mortality in men due to its heterogeneity and the emergence of drug resistance. A critical factor contributing to its lethality is the presence of prostate cancer stem cells (PCSCs), which can self-renew, long-term propagate tumors and mediate treatment resistance. MicroRNA-34a (miR-34a) has shown promise as an anti-PCSC therapeutic by targeting critical molecules involved in cancer stem cell (CSC) survival and functions. Despite extensive efforts, the development of miR-34a therapeutics still faces challenges, including non-specific delivery and delivery-associated toxicity. One emerging delivery approach is ligand-mediated conjugation, aiming to achieve specific delivery of miR-34a to cancer cells, thereby enhancing efficacy while minimizing toxicity. Folate-conjugated miR-34a (folate-miR-34a) has demonstrated promising anti-tumor efficacy in breast and lung cancers by targeting folate receptor α (FOLR1). Here, we first show that miR-34a, a TP53 transcriptional target, is reduced in PCa that harbors TP53 loss or mutations and that miR-34a mimic, when transfected into PCa cells, downregulated multiple miR-34a targets and inhibited cell growth. When exploring the therapeutic potential of folate-miR-34a, we found that folate-miR-34a exhibited impressive inhibitory effects on breast, ovarian and cervical cancer cells but showed minimal effects on and targeted delivery to PCa cells due to a lack of appreciable expression of FOLR1 in PCa cells. Folate-miR-34a also did not display any apparent effect on PCa cells expressing prostate-specific membrane antigen (PMSA) despite the reported folate's binding capability to PSMA. These results highlight challenges in specific delivery of folate-miR-34a to PCa due to lack of target (receptor) expression. Our study offers novel insights on the challenges and promises within the field and cast light on the development of ligand-conjugated miR-34a therapeutics for PCa.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Merkel Cell Carcinoma, Version 1.2024

The NCCN Guidelines for Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) provide recommendations for diagnostic workup, clinical stage, and treatment options for patients. The panel meets annually to discuss updates to the guidelines based on comments from expert review from panel members, institutional review, as well as submissions from within NCCN and external organizations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the introduction of a new page for locally advanced disease in the setting of clinical node negative status, entitled "Clinical N0 Disease, Locally Advanced MCC." This new algorithm page addresses locally advanced disease, and the panel clarifies the meaning behind the term "nonsurgical" by further defining locally advanced disease. In addition, the guideline includes the management of in-transit disease and updates to the systemic therapy options.

Basal Cell Skin Cancer, Version 2.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common form of skin cancer in the United States. Due to the high frequency, BCC occurrences are not typically recorded, and annual rates of incidence can only be estimated. Current estimated rates are 2 million Americans affected annually, and this continues to rise. Exposure to radiation, from either sunlight or previous medical therapy, is a key player in BCC development. BCC is not as aggressive as other skin cancers because it is less likely to metastasize. However, surgery and radiation are prevalent treatment options, therefore disfigurement and limitation of function are significant considerations. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) outline an updated risk stratification and treatment options available for BCC.

The T Cell Immunoscore as a Reference for Biomarker Development Utilizing Real-World Data from Patients with Advanced Malignancies Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

We aimed to determine the prognostic value of an immunoscore reflecting CD3+ and CD8+ T cell density estimated from real-world transcriptomic data of a patient cohort with advanced malignancies treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in an effort to validate a reference for future machine learning-based biomarker development.

METHODS

Transcriptomic data was collected under the Total Cancer Care Protocol (NCT03977402) Avatar® project. The real-world immunoscore for each patient was calculated based on the estimated densities of tumor CD3+ and CD8+ T cells utilizing CIBERSORTx and the LM22 gene signature matrix. Then, the immunoscore association with overall survival (OS) was estimated using Cox regression and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. The OS predictions were assessed using Harrell's concordance index (C-index). The Youden index was used to identify the optimal cut-off point. Statistical significance was assessed using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Our study encompassed 522 patients with four cancer types. The median duration to death was 10.5 months for the 275 participants who encountered an event. For the entire cohort, the results demonstrated that transcriptomics-based immunoscore could significantly predict patients at risk of death (p-value < 0.001). Notably, patients with an intermediate-high immunoscore achieved better OS than those with a low immunoscore. In subgroup analysis, the prediction of OS was significant for melanoma and head and neck cancer patients but did not reach significance in the non-small cell lung cancer or renal cell carcinoma cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Calculating CD3+ and CD8+ T cell immunoscore using real-world transcriptomic data represents a promising signature for estimating OS with ICIs and can be used as a reference for future machine learning-based biomarker development.

Risk of Further Progression or Death Among Durable Progression-Free Survivors With Melanoma or Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in PD-1 Blockade Trials: Implications for Imaging Surveillance

PURPOSE

Durable progression-free survivors (dPFSors) over 2 years have been reported among patients with melanoma or non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received PD-(L)1 therapy. However, risk of progression still exists and the optimal imaging surveillance interval is unknown.

METHODS

Individual patient data for progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted from PD-1 blockade clinical trials with a follow-up of at least 5 years. Patients with a PFS of at least 2 years were considered as dPFSors. Conditional risks of progression/death (P/D) every 3, 4, 6, and 12 months in each subsequent year were calculated. We prespecified three different levels of risk between scans (10%, 15%, or 20%) to allow clinicians and patients to decide on the scanning interval on the basis of considerations of imaging frequency and risk tolerance. An interval is considered acceptable if the upper bound of the 95% CI of the risk at each scan is lower than a prespecified level.

RESULTS

Of 1,495 and 3,752 patients with melanoma and NSCLC, 474 (31.7%) and 586 (15.6%) were dPFSors, respectively. Among them, the PFS probability for an additional 3 years was 76.4% and 48.1%, respectively. Not more than 8% of patients had P/D in any quarter in the 3 years. With a risk threshold of 10%, melanoma dPFSors can be scanned every 6 months during the third year and then every 12 months in years 4 and 5. The interval for NSCLC would be every 3 months in the third year and every 4 months in years 4 and 5. The higher risk tolerance of 15% and 20% would allow for less frequent scans.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of their own risk tolerance level, our findings allow clinicians and dPFSors make data-driven decisions regarding the imaging surveillance schedule beyond every 3 months.

Adjuvant everolimus after surgery for renal cell carcinoma (EVEREST): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing resection of renal cell carcinoma are at risk of disease relapse. We evaluated the effectiveness of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus administered after surgery.

METHODS

In this randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial, we enrolled adults with histologically confirmed renal cell carcinoma who had undergone a full surgical resection and were at intermediate-high or very high risk of recurrence at 398 academic and community institution centres in the USA. After nephrectomy, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a central web-based application using a dynamic balancing algorithm to receive 10 mg oral everolimus daily or placebo for 54 weeks. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival. Efficacy analyses included all eligible, randomly assigned patients; safety analysis included all patients who received treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01120249 and is closed to new participants.

FINDINGS

Between April 1, 2011, and Sept 15, 2016, a total of 1545 patients were randomly assigned to receive everolimus (n=775) or placebo (n=770), of whom 755 assigned to everolimus and 744 assigned to placebo were eligible for inclusion in the efficacy analysis. With a median follow-up of 76 months (IQR 61-92), recurrence-free survival was longer with everolimus than with placebo (5-year recurrence-free survival 67% [95% CI 63-70] vs 63% [60-67]; stratified log-rank p=0·050; stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·85, 95% CI 0·72-1·00; p=0·051) but did not meet the prespecified p value for statistical significance of 0·044. Recurrence-free survival was longer with everolimus than with placebo in the very-high-risk group (HR 0·79, 95% CI 0·65-0·97; p=0·022) but not in the intermediate-high-risk group (0·99, 0·73-1·35; p=0·96). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 343 (46%) of 740 patients who received everolimus and 79 (11%) of 723 who received placebo.

INTERPRETATION

Postoperative everolimus did not improve recurrence-free survival compared with placebo among patients with renal cell carcinoma at high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy. These results do not support the adjuvant use of everolimus for renal cell carcinoma after surgery.

FUNDING

US National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, National Clinical Trials Network, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, and The Hope Foundation.

Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method to measure the BRAF inhibitors dabrafenib and encorafenib quantitatively and four major metabolites semi-quantitatively in human plasma

This article describes the development and validation of a liquid-chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay for the simultaneous quantitation of the BRAF inhibitors dabrafenib and encorafenib, and semi-quantitation of their major metabolites (i.e., carboxy-dabrafenib, desmethyl-dabrafenib, hydroxy-dabrafenib, M42.5A) in human plasma. Analytes were extracted from human plasma by protein precipitation, followed by reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Analyte detection was performed using tandem mass spectrometry with heated electrospray ionization operating in positive ion mode. The assay was validated in accordance with the current U.S. Food and Drug Administration Guidance on Bioanalytical Method Validation. Results showed that measurements were both accurate (94.6-112.0 %) and precise (within-run: 1.9-3.4 %; between-run: 1.7-12.0 %) spanning a concentration range of 5 to 2000 ng/mL for dabrafenib and 10 to 4000 ng/mL for encorafenib. Recoveries for these analytes were consistent with mean values ranging from 85.6 % to 90.9 %. The mean internal standard-normalized matrix factors for each drug ranged between 0.87 and 0.98 and were found to be precise (% RSD <6.4 %). Dabrafenib and encorafenib were stable in the final extract and in human plasma held under various storage conditions. The metabolites also passed the validation criteria for precision and selectivity. Finally, the clinical applicability of the assay was confirmed by (semi-)quantitation of all six analytes in plasma samples from cancer patients receiving standard-of-care treatment with dabrafenib and encorafenib. Reproducibility of the measured analyte concentrations in study samples was confirmed successfully by incurred sample reanalysis. In conclusion, this sensitive LC-MS/MS assay has been validated successfully and is suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring of dabrafenib and encorafenib and clinical pharmacokinetic studies with these BRAF inhibitors.

Perspectives in Melanoma: meeting report from the Melanoma Bridge (December 1st-3rd, 2022-Naples, Italy)

Outcomes for patients with melanoma have improved over the past decade with the clinical development and approval of immunotherapies targeting immune checkpoint receptors such as programmed death-1 (PD-1), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) or cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4). Combinations of these checkpoint therapies with other agents are now being explored to improve outcomes and enhance benefit-risk profiles of treatment. Alternative inhibitory receptors have been identified that may be targeted for anti-tumor immune therapy, such as lymphocyte-activation gene-3 (LAG-3), as have several potential target oncogenes for molecularly targeted therapy, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Unfortunately, many patients still progress and acquire resistance to immunotherapy and molecularly targeted therapies. To bypass resistance, combination treatment with immunotherapies and single or multiple TKIs have been shown to improve prognosis compared to monotherapy. The number of new combinations treatment under development for melanoma provides options for the number of patients to achieve a therapeutic benefit. Many diagnostic and prognostic assays have begun to show clinical applicability providing additional tools to optimize and individualize treatments. However, the question on the optimal algorithm of first- and later-line therapies and the search for biomarkers to guide these decisions are still under investigation. This year, the Melanoma Bridge Congress (Dec 1st-3rd, 2022, Naples, Italy) addressed the latest advances in melanoma research, focusing on themes of paramount importance for melanoma prevention, diagnosis and treatment. This included sessions dedicated to systems biology on immunotherapy, immunogenicity and gene expression profiling, biomarkers, and combination treatment strategies.

Perspectives in Immunotherapy: meeting report from Immunotherapy Bridge (Naples, November 30th-December 1st, 2022)

The discovery and development of novel treatments that harness the patient's immune system and prevent immune escape has dramatically improved outcomes for patients across cancer types. However, not all patients respond to immunotherapy, acquired resistance remains a challenge, and responses are poor in certain tumors which are considered to be immunologically cold. This has led to the need for new immunotherapy-based approaches, including adoptive cell transfer (ACT), therapeutic vaccines, and novel immune checkpoint inhibitors. These new approaches are focused on patients with an inadequate response to current treatments, with emerging evidence of improved responses in various cancers with new immunotherapy agents, often in combinations with existing agents. The use of cell therapies, drivers of immune response, and trends in immunotherapy were the focus of the Immunotherapy Bridge (November 30th-December 1st, 2022), organized by the Fondazione Melanoma Onlus, Naples, Italy, in collaboration with the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.

Talimogene laherparepvec in combination with ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone for advanced melanoma: 5-year final analysis of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II trial

Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) plus ipilimumab has demonstrated greater antitumor activity versus ipilimumab alone, without additional toxicity, in patients with advanced melanoma. Here, we report the 5-year outcomes from a randomized phase II study. These data provide the longest efficacy and safety follow-up for patients with melanoma treated with a combination of an oncolytic virus and a checkpoint inhibitor.Eligible patients with unresectable stage IIIB‒IV melanoma were randomized 1:1 to receive T-VEC plus ipilimumab or ipilimumab alone. T-VEC was administered intralesionally at 106 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL in week 1, followed by 108 PFU/mL in week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter. Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg every 3 weeks; ≤4 doses) was administered intravenously starting at week 1 in the ipilimumab arm and week 6 in the combination arm. The primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per immune-related response criteria; key secondary end points included durable response rate (DRR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.Overall, 198 patients were randomized to receive the combination (n=98) or ipilimumab (n=100). The combination improved the ORR versus ipilimumab (35.7% vs 16.0%; OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.5 to 5.7; p=0.003). DRR was 33.7% and 13.0% (unadjusted OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.7 to 7.0; descriptive p=0.001), respectively. Among the objective responders, the median DOR was 69.2 months (95% CI 38.5 to not estimable) with the combination and was not reached with ipilimumab. Median PFS was 13.5 months with the combination and 6.4 months with ipilimumab (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.09; descriptive p=0.14). Estimated 5-year OS was 54.7% (95% CI 43.9 to 64.2) in the combination arm and 48.4% (95% CI 37.9 to 58.1) in the ipilimumab arm. Forty-seven (48.0%) and 65 (65.0%) patients in the combination and ipilimumab arms, respectively, received subsequent therapies. No new safety signals were reported.At the 5-year follow-up, the improved response rates observed with T-VEC plus ipilimumab were durable. This is the first randomized controlled study of the combination of an oncolytic virus and a checkpoint inhibitor that meets its primary end point.Trial registration number: NCT01740297.

The "Great Debate" at Immunotherapy Bridge 2022, Naples, November 30th-December 1st, 2022

The 2022 Immunotherapy Bridge congress (November 30-December 1, Naples, Italy) featured a Great Debate session which addressed three contemporary topics in the field of immunotherapy. The debates included counterpoint views from leading experts and considered whether adoptive cell therapy (ACT) has a role in the treatment of solid tumors, the use of peripheral/blood biomarkers versus tumor microenvironment biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy and the role of chimeric antigen receptor T cell versus natural killer cell therapy. As is the tradition in the Immunotherapy Bridge Great Debates, speakers are invited by the meeting Chairs to express one side of the assigned debate and the opinions given may not fully reflect their own personal views. Audiences voted in favour of either side of the topic both before and after each debate.

The "Great Debate" at Melanoma Bridge 2022, Naples, December 1st-3rd, 2022

The Great Debate session at the 2022 Melanoma Bridge congress (December 1-3) featured counterpoint views from leading experts on five contemporary topics of debate in the management of melanoma. The debates considered the choice of anti-lymphocyte-activation gene (LAG)-3 therapy or ipilimumab in combination with anti-programmed death (PD)-1 therapy, whether anti-PD-1 monotherapy is still acceptable as a comparator arm in clinical trials, whether adjuvant treatment of melanoma is still a useful treatment option, the role of adjuvant therapy in stage II melanoma, what role surgery will continue to have in the treatment of melanoma. As is customary in the Melanoma Bridge Great Debates, the speakers are invited by the meeting Chairs to express one side of the assigned debate and the opinions given may not fully reflect personal views. Audiences voted in favour of either side of the argument both before and after each debate.

Abstract 5703: The immune cell state atlas analysis predicts therapeutic benefits with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Introduction: In this study, we investigated the prognostic role of the immune cell state atlas in predicting therapeutic benefits of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) within the ORIEN network of 18 collaborating cancer centers under the Total Cancer Care protocol.

Methods: We utilized RNA-seq data of 926 samples generated from 875 individuals. Gene expression data were deconvoluted for immune cell states using the Carcinoma EcoTyper software. We then conducted a series of survival analyses to test the association between survival outcomes and predicted cell types and states in five malignant tumors: Genitourinary (GU), Gastrointestinal (GI), Thoracic (THO), Cutaneous (CUT), Head & Neck (H&N). The regularized Cox regression model in R package ‘glmnet’ was then applied to select the complementary pathway signatures (including gene ontology and KEGG pathways) to the immune cell states in predicting survival outcomes. We also explored the immune-related long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA) as potential biomarkers for cell states and patient outcomes.

Results: EcoTyper analysis revealed that 692 (~80%) of patients were assigned to the 10 pre-identified Carcinoma Ecotypes (CE1 to CE10) or cell state atlas group. Overall, two immune deficiency ecotype patient groups (CE1 and CE2) pre-identified based on the independent training data were linked to worse survival, while two proinflammatory ecotype groups (CE9 and CE10) were associated with favorable surxvival. Those ecotype groups showed strong prognostic significance in predicting OS in melanoma and H&N. Meanwhile, CE6, a non-neoplastic tissue enriched cell subtype, was also found to be highly associated with longer OS in H&N and GU. CE7, an age-related mutation patient subgroup, contributed to shorter survival in both melanoma and GI. We also found that a subset of activated B cell state and the exhausted/effector CD4 T cell state were significantly associated with patient survival in melanoma and GU, respectively. The penalized Cox regression model revealed that β-catenin signaling pathway, P53 pathway and heme metabolism in the MSigDB Hallmark gene sets are the most complementary pathways to the ecotype scores in multiple cancer types. In additional, multiple pathways in KEGG such as endocytosis were found to jointly contribute to the ecotype-pathway composite prognostic model. In anazlying immune-related lncRNA biomarkers, we highlighted the prognostic role of NKILA in our dataset, which has been studied to promote tumor immune evasion.

Conclusion: Our analysis has successfully established the utility of immune cell state atlas in predicting therapeutic benefits with ICIs. We expect that the discovered complementary signatures in the cancer-cell compartment will also lead to a novel spectrum of tumor-based biomarkers to ICI.

Citation Format: Tingyi Li, Vineeth Sukrithan, Aakrosh Ratan, Martin McCarter, John Carpten, Howard Colman, Alexandra P. Ikeguchi, Xuefeng Wang, Igor Puzanov, Susanne Dalton, Michelle Churchman, Patrick Hwu, Paulo C. Rodriguez, William S. Dalton, George J. Weiner, Ahmad Tarhini. The immune cell state atlas analysis predicts therapeutic benefits with immune checkpoint inhibitors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 5703.

Integrated single-cell analysis defines the epigenetic basis of castration-resistant prostate luminal cells

Understanding prostate response to castration and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) is critical to improving long-term prostate cancer (PCa) patient survival. Here we use a multi-omics approach on 229,794 single cells to create a mouse single-cell reference atlas better suited to interpreting mouse prostate biology and castration response. Our reference atlas refines single-cell annotations and provides chromatin context, which, when coupled with mouse lineage tracing demonstrates that the castration-resistant luminal cells are distinct from the pre-existent urethra-proximal stem/progenitor cells. Molecular pathway analysis and therapeutic studies further implicate JUN/FOS, WNT/B-Catenin, FOXQ1, NFkB, and JAK/STAT pathways as the major drivers of castration-resistant luminal populations with high relevance to human PCa. Importantly, we demonstrate the utility of our datasets, which can be explored through an interactive portal (https://visportal.roswellpark.org/data/tang/), to aid in developing novel combination treatments with ARSI for advanced PCa patients.

Survival, Durable Tumor Remission, and Long-Term Safety in Patients With Advanced Melanoma Receiving Nivolumab

PURPOSE

Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) is an inhibitory receptor expressed by activated T cells that downmodulates effector functions and limits the generation of immune memory. PD-1 blockade can mediate tumor regression in a substantial proportion of patients with melanoma, but it is not known whether this is associated with extended survival or maintenance of response after treatment is discontinued.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced melanoma (N = 107) enrolled between 2008 and 2012 received intravenous nivolumab in an outpatient setting every 2 weeks for up to 96 weeks and were observed for overall survival, long-term safety, and response duration after treatment discontinuation.

RESULTS

Median overall survival in nivolumab-treated patients (62% with two to five prior systemic therapies) was 16.8 months, and 1- and 2-year survival rates were 62% and 43%, respectively. Among 33 patients with objective tumor regressions (31%), the Kaplan-Meier estimated median response duration was 2 years. Seventeen patients discontinued therapy for reasons other than disease progression, and 12 (71%) of 17 maintained responses off-therapy for at least 16 weeks (range, 16 to 56+ weeks). Objective response and toxicity rates were similar to those reported previously; in an extended analysis of all 306 patients treated on this trial (including those with other cancer types), exposure-adjusted toxicity rates were not cumulative.

CONCLUSION

Overall survival following nivolumab treatment in patients with advanced treatment-refractory melanoma compares favorably with that in literature studies of similar patient populations. Responses were durable and persisted after drug discontinuation. Long-term safety was acceptable. Ongoing randomized clinical trials will further assess the impact of nivolumab therapy on overall survival in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Global Phase III Trial of Talimogene Laherparepvec Combined With Pembrolizumab for Advanced Melanoma

PURPOSE

The combination of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) and pembrolizumab previously demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and an encouraging complete response rate (CRR) in patients with advanced melanoma in a phase Ib study. We report the efficacy and safety from a phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, international study of T-VEC plus pembrolizumab (T-VEC-pembrolizumab) versus placebo plus pembrolizumab (placebo-pembrolizumab) in patients with advanced melanoma.

METHODS

Patients with stage IIIB-IVM1c unresectable melanoma, naïve to antiprogrammed cell death protein-1, were randomly assigned 1:1 to T-VEC-pembrolizumab or placebo-pembrolizumab. T-VEC was administered at ≤ 4 × 106 plaque-forming unit (PFU) followed by ≤ 4 × 108 PFU 3 weeks later and once every 2 weeks until dose 5 and once every 3 weeks thereafter. Pembrolizumab was administered intravenously 200 mg once every 3 weeks. The dual primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) per modified RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review and overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included objective response rate per mRECIST, CRR, and safety. Here, we report the primary analysis for PFS, the second preplanned interim analysis for OS, and the final analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 692 patients were randomly assigned (346 T-VEC-pembrolizumab and 346 placebo-pembrolizumab). T-VEC-pembrolizumab did not significantly improve PFS (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.04; P = .13) or OS (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.22; P = .74) compared with placebo-pembrolizumab. The objective response rate was 48.6% for T-VEC-pembrolizumab (CRR 17.9%) and 41.3% for placebo-pembrolizumab (CRR 11.6%); the durable response rate was 42.2% and 34.1% for the arms, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 20.7% of patients in the T-VEC-pembrolizumab arm and in 19.5% of patients in the placebo-pembrolizumab arm.

CONCLUSION

T-VEC-pembrolizumab did not significantly improve PFS or OS compared with placebo-pembrolizumab. Safety results of the T-VEC-pembrolizumab combination were consistent with the safety profiles of each agent alone.

Evolving Management of Stage IV Melanoma

Significant advancements have been made in the treatment of advanced melanoma with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, novel immunotherapies, and BRAF/MEK-targeted therapies with numerous frontline treatment options. However, there remains suboptimal evidence to guide treatment decisions in many patients. These include patients with newly diagnosed disease, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-resistant/ICI-refractory disease, CNS metastases, history of autoimmune disease, and/or immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare melanoma associated with a poor prognosis in the metastatic setting. Systemic treatments, including checkpoint inhibitors, failed to demonstrate any survival benefit. Tebentafusp, a bispecific molecule, is the first treatment to improve overall survival (OS) in patients with HLA A*02:01-positive metastatic UM.

Tilsotolimod Exploits the TLR9 Pathway to Promote Antigen Presentation and Type 1 IFN Signaling in Solid Tumors: A Multicenter International Phase I/II Trial (ILLUMINATE-101)

PURPOSE

Tilsotolimod is an investigational synthetic Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) agonist that has demonstrated antitumor activity in preclinical models. The ILLUMINATE-101 phase I study explored the safety, dose, efficacy, and immune effects of intratumoral (it) tilsotolimod monotherapy in multiple solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of refractory cancer not amenable to curative therapies received tilsotolimod in doses escalating from 8 to 32 mg into a single lesion at weeks 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, and 11. Additional patients with advanced malignant melanoma were enrolled into an expansion cohort at the 8 mg dose. Objectives included characterizing the safety, establishing the dose, efficacy, and immunologic assessment. Blood samples and tumor biopsies of injected and noninjected lesions were obtained at baseline and 24 hours after treatment for immune analyses.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight and 16 patients were enrolled into the dose escalation and melanoma expansion cohorts, respectively. Deep visceral injections were conducted in 91% of patients. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) or grade 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed. Biopsies 24 hours after treatment demonstrated an increased IFN pathway signature and dendritic cell maturation. Immunologic profiling revealed upregulation of IFN-signaling genes and modulation of genes for checkpoint proteins. In the dose escalation cohort, 12 (34%) of 35 evaluable patients achieved a best overall response rate (ORR) of stable disease (SD), whereas 3 (19%) of 16 evaluable patients in the melanoma cohort achieved stable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, tilsotolimod monotherapy was generally well tolerated and induced rapid, robust alterations in the tumor microenvironment. See related commentary by Punekar and Weber, p. 5007.

Perspectives in Melanoma: meeting report from the Melanoma Bridge (December 2nd - 4th, 2021, Italy)

Advances in immune checkpoint and combination therapy have led to improvement in overall survival for patients with advanced melanoma. Improved understanding of the tumor, tumor microenvironment and tumor immune-evasion mechanisms has resulted in new approaches to targeting and harnessing the host immune response. Combination modalities with other immunotherapy agents, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, electrochemotherapy are also being explored to overcome resistance and to potentiate the immune response. In addition, novel approaches such as adoptive cell therapy, oncogenic viruses, vaccines and different strategies of drug administration including sequential, or combination treatment are being tested. Despite the progress in diagnosis of melanocytic lesions, correct classification of patients, selection of appropriate adjuvant and systemic theràapies, and prediction of response to therapy remain real challenges in melanoma. Improved understanding of the tumor microenvironment, tumor immunity and response to therapy has prompted extensive translational and clinical research in melanoma. There is a growing evidence that genomic and immune features of pre-treatment tumor biopsies may correlate with response in patients with melanoma and other cancers, but they have yet to be fully characterized and implemented clinically. Development of novel biomarker platforms may help to improve diagnostics and predictive accuracy for selection of patients for specific treatment. Overall, the future research efforts in melanoma therapeutics and translational research should focus on several aspects including: (a) developing robust biomarkers to predict efficacy of therapeutic modalities to guide clinical decision-making and optimize treatment regimens, (b) identifying mechanisms of therapeutic resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors that are potentially actionable, (c) identifying biomarkers to predict therapy-induced adverse events, and (d) studying mechanism of actions of therapeutic agents and developing algorithms to optimize combination treatments. During the Melanoma Bridge meeting (December 2nd-4th, 2021, Naples, Italy) discussions focused on the currently approved systemic and local therapies for advanced melanoma and discussed novel biomarker strategies and advances in precision medicine as well as the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on management of melanoma patients.

Neural Net Modeling of Checkpoint Inhibitor Related Myocarditis and Steroid Response

Background

Serious but rare side effects associated with immunotherapy pose a difficult problem for regulators and practitioners. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have come into widespread use in oncology in recent years and are associated with rare cardiotoxicity, including potentially fatal myocarditis. To date, no comprehensive model of myocarditis progression and outcomes integrating time-series based laboratory and clinical signals has been constructed. In this paper, we describe a time-series neural net (NN) model of ICI-related myocarditis derived using supervised machine learning.

Methods

We extracted and modeled data from electronic medical records of ICI-treated patients who had an elevation in their troponin. All data collection was performed using an electronic case report form, with approximately 300 variables collected on as many occasions as available, yielding 6000 data elements per patient over their clinical course. Key variables were scored 0-5 and sequential assessments were used to construct the model. The NN model was developed in MatLab and applied to analyze the time course and outcomes of treatments.

Results

We identified 23 patients who had troponin elevations related to their ICI therapy, 15 of whom had ICI-related myocarditis, while the remaining 8 patients on ICIs had other causes for troponin elevation, such as myocardial infarction. Our model showed that troponin was the most predictive biomarker of myocarditis, in line with prior studies. Our model also identified early and aggressive use of steroid treatment as a major determinant of survival for cases of grade 3 or 4 ICI-related myocarditis.

Conclusion

Our study shows that a supervised learning NN can be used to model rare events such as ICI-related myocarditis and thus provide clinical insight into drivers of progression and treatment outcomes. These findings direct attention to early detection biomarkers and clinical symptoms as the best means of implementing early and potentially life-saving steroid treatment.

Augmenting antibody response to EGF-depleting immunotherapy: Findings from a phase I trial of CIMAvax-EGF in combination with nivolumab in advanced stage NSCLC

Background

CIMAvax-EGF is an epidermal growth factor (EGF)-depleting immunotherapy which has shown survival benefit as a switch maintenance treatment after platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary objective of this trial is to establish the safety and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of CIMAvax-EGF in combination with nivolumab as second-line therapy for NSCLC.

Methods

Patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-naive metastatic NSCLC were enrolled using a “3+3” dose-escalation design. Toxicities were graded according to CTCAE V4.03. Thirteen patients (one unevaluable), the majority with PD-L1 0%, were enrolled into two dose levels of CIMAvax-EGF.

Findings

The combination was determined to be safe and tolerable. The recommended phase 2 dose of CIMAvax-EGF was 2.4 mg. Humoral response to CIMAvax-EGF was achieved earlier and in a greater number of patients with the combination compared to historical control. Four out of 12 evaluable patients had an objective response.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of nonmelanoma skin cancer

Nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) are some of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies. In general, early-stage NMSCs have favorable outcomes; however, a small subset of patients develop resistant, advanced, or metastatic disease, or aggressive subtypes that are more challenging to treat successfully. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC), and basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Although ICIs have demonstrated activity against NMSCs, the routine clinical use of these agents may be more challenging due to a number of factors including the lack of predictive biomarkers, the need to consider special patient populations, the management of toxicity, and the assessment of atypical responses. With the goal of improving patient care by providing expert guidance to the oncology community, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to develop a clinical practice guideline (CPG). The expert panel drew on the published literature as well as their own clinical experience to develop recommendations for healthcare professionals on important aspects of immunotherapeutic treatment for NMSCs, including staging, biomarker testing, patient selection, therapy selection, post-treatment response evaluation and surveillance, and patient quality of life (QOL) considerations, among others. The evidence- and consensus-based recommendations in this CPG are intended to provide guidance to cancer care professionals treating patients with NMSCs.

Abstract CT145: Systemic rintatolimod and interferon-α2b selectively reprogram local tumor microenvironment in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer for enhanced influx of cytotoxic T-lymphocytes but not regulatory T-cells

Background: Effective immune therapies depend on the presence of cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Our preclinical data showed synergy between TLR3 ligands and interferon-α (IFN-α) in reprogramming the TME, but not healthy tissues, to selectively enhance CTL attraction, providing rationale for their systemic application to enhance local CTL densities in “cold” tumors. The pilot study NCT03599453 evaluated the safety of systemic chemokine modulating regimen (CKM) composed of i.v. rintatolimod (Ampligen; selective TLR3 ligand) and IFN-α, and its ability to promote local CTL influx to mTNBC lesions.

Methods: Six evaluable patients (33-75 years) with mTNBC received 6 doses of rintatolimod (200 mg i.v.), IFN-α (INTRON-A; 20MU/m2 i.v.) and COX-2 inhibitor (celecoxib; 2 x 200 mg, p.o.) over 2 weeks, with tumor biopsies obtained before (within 6 days) and after (within 5 days) CKM. All patients received follow-up pembrolizumab (200 mg, i.v, Q3 weeks). The primary endpoint was the change in the CTL marker CD8α in the TME with a planned interim analysis after 3 patients (α=0.03) and final analysis after 6 patients (α=0.084). Correlative studies analyzed additional markers of CTLs, regulatory T-cells (Tregs), and CTL- and Treg-attracting chemokines in the TME and blood.

Results: Treatment was well tolerated with mostly grade 1/2 adverse events and one grade 3 clinically significant pneumonitis and immune thrombocytopenic purpura observed during follow up pembrolizumab treatment. We observed uniform increases of intratumoral type-1 immune markers upon treatment: CD8α mRNA (6.1-fold; p=0.034), GZMB (3.5-fold; p=0.058), ratios of CD8α/FOXP3 and GZMB/FOXP3 (5.7-fold; p=0.036, and 7.6-fold; p=0.024 respectively), and CTL attractants CXCL10 (2.6-fold; p=0.104) and CCL5 (3.3-fold; p=0.019), successfully meeting the primary endpoint. In contrast, neither Treg marker Foxp3 nor Treg attractants CCL22 or CXCL12 were enhanced. These TME changes were accompanied by transient decreases in circulating CD3+CD8+ CTLs and CD3-CD56+ NK cells (but not Tregs), selectively affecting the cells expressing CXCR3 (receptor for CXCL10), but not CCR4 or CXCR4 (receptors for CCL22 and CXCL12). Three patients had stable disease lasting 2.4, 2.5 and 3.8 months, as of September 1, 2021 cut-off. An additional patient had a partial response (breast auto-amputation) with massive tumor necrosis observed in the post-CKM biopsy.

Conclusion: This proof-of-concept study shows that short-term systemic CKM followed by pembrolizumab is safe and selectively enhances local CTL infiltration in the TME, providing rationale for concurrent CKM and PD1 blockade in prospective phase II studies.

Citation Format: Shipra Gandhi, Mateusz Opyrchal, Melissa Grimm, Ronald Slomba, Kathleen Kokolus, Sebastiano Battaglia, Kristopher Attwood, Adrienne Groman, Lauren Williams, Mary Lynne Tarquini, Paul Wallace, Kah Teong Soh, Tracey O'Connor, Amy Early, Ellis Levine, Igor Puzanov, Marc Ernstoff, Pawel Kalinski. Systemic rintatolimod and interferon-α2b selectively reprogram local tumor microenvironment in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer for enhanced influx of cytotoxic T-lymphocytes but not regulatory T-cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT145.

Abstract 4151: Effect of camidanlumab tesirine (Cami) as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab (PEM) on the immune cell profile in patients with selected advanced solid tumors

Background: Cami, an investigational anti-CD25, pyrrolobenzodiazepine-based antibody drug conjugate, imparts cytotoxicity on CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs), leading to immunomodulatory effects (eg, modifying effector T cell [Teff]:Treg intratumoral balance).

Objective: Describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) and circulating immune cell profile of Cami monotherapy and in combination with PEM in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods: In the dose-escalation phase 1b trial of Cami (NCT03621982) in patients with advanced solid tumors after failure of recommended therapies, we investigated Cami monotherapy (n=44; doses: 20, 30, 45, 60, 80, 100, 125, and 150 µg/kg every 3 weeks [Q3W]) and Cami combination therapy (n=12; doses: 30, 45, and 60 µg/kg with PEM 200 mg Q3W). Serum conjugated antibody (cAb) and total antibody (tAb) were quantified by a validated chemoimmunoluminescence assay. Soluble CD25 was quantified by a qualified enzyme-linked immunoassay. Circulating immune cell absolute counts were assessed by flow cytometry for Tregs (FoxP3+CD25+CD127low) as a fraction of absolute CD4+ cells, Teff (CD8+), and Teff:Treg. Statistical analyses were performed using a linear mixed-effects model (maximum likelihood) for the biomarker effects model with cAb area under the curve (AUC) during cycle 1, therapy (monotherapy vs combination), and treatment cycle as fixed effects and log AUC slope with intercept by subject or visit day as random effects.

Results: PK analysis found Cmax and AUC of cAb and tAb increased during cycles 1 and 2 with Cami monotherapy and combination therapy across the range of doses. Variability of AUCinf for cAb in cycle 1 appeared modest to marked across discrete dose groups (CV=14.7-98.1%). The clearance of cAb ranged from 1.34 to 3.52 L/day in cycle 1 with no apparent differences between monotherapy and combination therapy. Biomarker modeling demonstrated that cAb AUC and cycle were associated with a significant Tregs depletion and a significant positive effect on Teff:Treg ratio but with no relevant effect on Teff. Within cycle, treatment-related modulation of Teff and Tregs was observed for all doses and conditions. Soluble CD25 appears to be significantly positively affected by cycle 2 treatment.

Conclusions: PK exposure of Cami was dose-related with varying degrees of interpatient variability. Circulating Tregs were significantly decreased and Teff:Treg was significantly increased by Cami exposure, demonstrating the intended immunomodulatory effect of Cami in circulation and suggesting that a combination approach with Cami could address an immune-resistance mechanism. Future analyses will consider discrete PEM effect, correlates to tumor biopsy expression and response, and combined Cami+PEM effect in tumor biopsies. Funding: ADC Therapeutics; medical writing: CiTRUS Health Group.

Citation Format: Igor Puzanov, Christopher T. Chen, Patricia LoRusso, Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos, Shivaani Kummar, Erika Hamilton, Yvan LeBruchec, Karin Havenith, Serafino Pantano, Marie Toukam, Jens Wuerthner, Joseph Boni. Effect of camidanlumab tesirine (Cami) as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab (PEM) on the immune cell profile in patients with selected advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 4151.

Abstract CT568: β-2 adrenergic receptor (AR): Another immune checkpoint (IC)" A phase II clinical trial of propranolol (P) with pembrolizumab (Pem) in patients with unresectable stage III and stage IV melanoma

Background: Adrenergic stress (AS) reduces anti-tumor response by decreasing the frequency and function of CD8+ T- cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME), resulting in an increase in those with an “exhausted” phenotype.1 Additionally, AS increases the quantity and immunosuppressive phenotype of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) in the TME.2 The data above suggests that β-2 AR acts akin to a tumorigenic IC which can be abrogated by using P, a well-known and highly cost efficient non-selective β-blocker. Synergistic activity of anti-PD-1 with P has been reported in several murine tumor models, including the B-16 OVA mouse model.3,4 A retrospective study has shown an improvement in overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma (MM) treated concurrently with non-selective β-blocker and immunotherapy.5 This formed the basis for our phase I study of the combination of P (at dose levels; 10 mg, 20 mg BID, and 30mg BID) and pem 200 mg every 3 weeks in pts with MM. Our published phase I results found all 3 dose levels of P to be well tolerated, and an objective response was observed in 7/9 pts.6 A decrease in perceived stress score (PSS) in pts over time was observed. Intra-tumor ratio of (CD4+T cells + CD8+T-cells)/(MDSC+ Treg) &gt;1 in the pre-treatment biopsy was predictive of treatment response. Based on the results of the phase I study, we chose P 30 mg BID as the recommended phase II dose. These results, though preliminary, strongly support our subsequent phase II clinical trial.

Methods: In this prospective, single-arm, phase II, multicenter trial, pts with unresectable stage III/IV MM and measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 will be treated with P (30 mg BID) + Pem. Pts with active CNS disease, prior therapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, or contraindications to β-blocker are excluded. The primary objective is to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) by immune-modified RECIST v1.1. The secondary objectives are the assessment of progression free survival and OS. A Simon two-stage design will be employed, requiring a minimum of 29 pts (17 in stage 1 and 12 in stage 2) to achieve approximately 80% power to detect a 20% increase (0.35 to 0.55) in the ORR. As an exploratory analysis, we will further report a) Baseline and on-treatment PSS and b) Chronotropic effect of P after 5-minute treadmill walk as a biomarker of response; c) Post therapy changes in the TME, with a 12 week on therapy optional biopsy d) Peripheral blood changes in T cell and MDSC subsets, and cytokines/chemokines. To date, 10 pts have been accrued on the study (NCT0384836).

Citation Format: Benjamin Switzer, Manu R. Pandey, Alexandra Valentine, Agnieszka Witkiewicz, Erik Knudsen, Kristopher Attwood, Joseph Tario, Pauline Funchain, Joseph J. Drabick, Hemn Mohammadpour, Marc S. Ernstoff, Igor Puzanov, Elizabeth A. Repasky, Shipra Gandhi. β-2 adrenergic receptor (AR): Another immune checkpoint (IC)" A phase II clinical trial of propranolol (P) with pembrolizumab (Pem) in patients with unresectable stage III and stage IV melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT568.

Abstract CT218: First-in-human trial of intravenous MEDI9253, an oncolytic virus, in combination with durvalumab in patients with advanced solid tumors

Background: Oncolytic viruses selectively infect tumors and activate antitumor immune responses via innate and adaptive pathways, leading to immunogenic cell death and potentiating the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. MEDI9253 is a recombinant Newcastle disease virus (NDV) that incorporates a human transgene encoding the immunostimulatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-12, which leads to tumor cell lysis and localized IL-12 expression. Preclinical studies show that MEDI9253 induces PD-L1 expression and recruits innate and adaptive immune cells to the tumor microenvironment (TME) and indicate that its antitumor activity is enhanced by concurrent PD-L1 blockade. This clinical study is evaluating intravenous (IV) MEDI9253 in combination with the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab in patients with selected advanced solid tumors.

Methods: This is a phase I, multicenter, open-label, dose escalation and dose expansion trial (NCT04613492) enrolling patients with microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer (MSS-CRC), renal cell carcinoma (RCC) or melanoma. Eligibility criteria include progressed/refractory disease or intolerance to all prior lines of therapy with proven survival benefit for recurrent/metastatic disease. Patients must have life expectancy ≥12 weeks by GRIm score; histologically documented disease; adequate performance status (ECOG 0-1); adequate organ function; and presence of RECIST v1.1 measurable disease amenable to repeated biopsy. Exclusion criteria include untreated/uncontrolled metastatic CNS involvement. Patients must take precautions to prevent the theoretical risk of NDV transmission to humans and birds. The trial will enroll up to ~192 patients across 30 centers globally. The dose escalation phase will evaluate a single dose of IV MEDI9253 with sequential IV durvalumab, then multiple-dose cohorts of up to 4 ascending dose levels of MEDI9253 with sequential or concurrent durvalumab. The dose expansion phase will include 3 cohorts of ~20 patients, each enrolling a single tumor type. In both phases, durvalumab will be dosed for up to 2 years or until disease progression, clinical deterioration, withdrawal of consent or unacceptable toxicity. Pretreatment and on-treatment tumor biopsies are required for patients in multiple-dose cohorts. The primary objectives are evaluating the safety, tolerability and incidence of dose-limiting toxicities of MEDI9253 and identifying the optimal dose/schedule in combination with durvalumab. Secondary objectives include assessing initial efficacy (response and progression-free survival by RECIST v1.1, and overall survival), pharmacodynamics in the TME, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics (viremia and IL-12). The trial is recruiting.

Citation Format: Noelia Purroy, Nicholas Durham, Marc Phillips, Maureen M. Hattersley, Lindsey Jung, Diwakar Davar, Dmitriy Zamarin, Tanner M. Johanns, Igor Puzanov. First-in-human trial of intravenous MEDI9253, an oncolytic virus, in combination with durvalumab in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT218.

EVEREST: Everolimus for renal cancer ensuing surgical therapy—A phase III study (SWOG S0931, NCT01120249)

LBA4500

Background: Patients (pts) who undergo resection of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with curative intent remain at risk for disease relapse. We conducted a phase III, double-blind, placebo (PB)-controlled, intergroup study to determine the effect of adjuvant treatment with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus (EVE) on recurrence-free survival (RFS). Methods: Pts with treatment-naïve, non-metastatic, fully-resected RCC at intermediate high- (pT1 G3-4 N0 to pT3a G1-2 N0) or very high-risk (pT3a G3-4 to pT4 G-any or N+) for recurrence were randomized 1:1 to EVE 10 mg PO daily x 54 weeks or PB within 12 weeks of radical or partial nephrectomy. Randomization was stratified by risk group, histology (clear vs. non-clear cell), and performance status (0 vs. 1). RFS was the primary end point; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). The study was designed to detect an 18% reduction in the risk of RFS with EVE compared to PB, corresponding to an improvement of median RFS from 6.75 (based on E2805 ASSURE) to 8.23 years. Final analysis, using a stratified logrank test, was to occur after 804 total events or by 3/2022, whichever occurred first. Results: Between 4/2011 and 9/2016, 1545 pts were randomized to EVE (n = 775) or PB (n = 770). Overall pt characteristics included: intermediate high-/very high-risk 45%/55%; clear cell/non-clear cell 83%/17%. The DSMC recommended study continuation after each of 4 pre-specified interim analyses. 556 DFS events among 1499 eligible pts occurred by the time of final study analysis on 2/23/2022. The median follow-up was 76 months. RFS was improved with EVE vs. PB (HR 0.85, 95% CI, 0.72 – 1.00; P1-sided= 0.0246), narrowly missing the pre-specified, one-sided significance level of 0.022 which accounted for interim analyses. Median RFS was not reached; the 6-year RFS estimate was 64% for EVE and 61% for PB. RFS improvement with EVE vs. PB was observed in the very high-risk group (HR 0.79, 95% 0.65-0.97; P1-sided= 0.011) but not in the intermediate high-risk group (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.73-1.35, P1-sided= 0.48) ( P for interaction = 0.22). With 290 deaths, OS was similar between arms (HR 0.90, 95% CI, 0.71 – 1.13; P1-sided= 0.178). Fewer pts completed all 54 weeks of study treatment in the EVE group (45% v 69%). In the EVE group, 37% withdrew due to AEs (vs 5% in PB). Grade 3-4 AEs occurred in 46% of pts treated with EVE and 11% with PB. The most common grade 3-4 AEs were mucositis (14% v 0%), hypertriglyceridemia (11% vs. 2%), and hyperglycemia (5% vs. 0%). Conclusions: Adjuvant EVE improved RFS in RCC pts after nephrectomy, but the nominal significance level was narrowly missed. The RFS improvement was seen despite a high rate of early treatment discontinuation. A 21% improvement in RFS with EVE was observed in pts with very high-risk disease, a group for whom adjuvant therapy may be most relevant. Clinical trial information: NCT01120249.

Perspectives in Immunotherapy: meeting report from the Immunotherapy Bridge, December 1st-2nd, 2021

Over the past decade, immunotherapy has become an increasingly fundamental modality in the treatment of cancer. The positive impact of immune checkpoint inhibition, especially anti-programmed death (PD)-1/PD-ligand (L)1 blockade, in patients with different cancers has focused attention on the potential for other immunotherapeutic approaches. These include inhibitors of additional immune checkpoints, adoptive cell transfer (ACT), and therapeutic vaccines. Patients with advanced cancers who previously had limited treatment options available may now benefit from immunotherapies that can offer durable responses and improved survival outcomes. However, despite this, a significant proportion of patients fail to respond to immunotherapy, especially those with less immunoresponsive cancer types, and there remains a need for new treatment strategies.The virtual Immunotherapy Bridge (December 1st-2nd, 2021), organized by the Fondazione Melanoma Onlus, Naples, Italy in collaboration with the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer addressed several areas of current research in immunotherapy, including lessons learned from cell therapies, drivers of immune response, and trends in immunotherapy across different cancers, and these are summarised here.

Predictors of immunotherapeutic benefits in patients with advanced melanoma and other malignancies treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors utilizing ORIEN “real-world” data

2618

Background: Despite the significant improvements in treating cancer with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), many patients (pts) do not achieve disease control. Using Oncology Research Information Exchange Network (ORIEN) Avatar real-world data conducted under the Total Cancer Care protocol we investigate predictive biomarkers of ICI benefits in pts with advanced malignancies. Methods: Clinical data were normalized as part of ORIEN Avatar. RNA-seq was performed on tumor samples following the RSEM pipeline and gene expressions were quantified as Transcript Per Million (TPM). Gene expressions (GE) were log2(TPM+1) transformed. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compute differences between groups, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Results: Pts (n=1214) with 27 cancer types treated with ICIs were retrieved from the database, where 1143 and 875 patients were profiled by WES and RNA-seq, respectively. 804 pts had both WES and RNA-seq data. The top six cancer types were renal cell carcinoma (n=206), non-small cell lung cancer (n=173), head and neck cancer (n=157), melanoma (n=154), sarcomas (n=99) and bladder cancer (n=87). The ICI regimens included therapy with atezolizumab (n=87), avelumab (n=12), cemiplimab (n=6), ipilimumab (n=47), nivolumab (n=424), pembrolizumab (n=525) and ipilimumab+nivolumab (n=113). Median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 21.9 months. Patients had significant improvement in OS if ICI was given in the first line ( P<0.0001). Previously published GE signatures were tested in the melanoma cohort. Signatures related to IFNg, effector T cells, chemokines, MHC II and Tertiary Lymphoid Structures were significantly prognostic and predictive of ICI benefits in advanced melanoma (Table). Analyses in the other cancer types are ongoing. Conclusions: GE data analyses validate the predictive value of immune related gene signatures following ICI immunotherapy in melanoma. Ongoing analyses are investigating these signatures in other malignancies and integrating the GE data with data related to TMB, somatic mutations and germline genetic variations.[Table: see text]

Toxicity and outcomes of BRAF and MEK inhibitor “ramp-up” dosing strategies for patients with melanoma: A real-world institutional experience

e21600

Background: Combination BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) and MEK inhibitor (MEKi) therapy is a widely accepted treatment option for patients (pts) with BRAF-V600E mutant melanoma. Although effective, these combinations exhibit high rates of adverse events (AEs), with 44% - 66% requiring dose modification or interruption and up to 26% discontinuing due to AEs in the adjuvant setting. Enhanced tolerance to BRAFi/MEKi is expected to improve pts quality of life and potentially enhance clinical outcomes. Clinicians at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (RPCCC) have implemented a dose escalation regimen upon initiation of BRAFi/MEKi in efforts to enhance the tolerance of these combinations for pts with BRAF-V600E mutant melanoma in the adjuvant and advanced setting. Here we present a retrospective analysis of the toxicity profiles and outcomes associated with this “ramp-up” approach. Methods: Pts presenting to RPCCC in Buffalo, NY for management of stage III or IV melanoma harboring BRAF-V600E mutations were retrospectively observed from 1/2012 to 12/2020. Pts starting BRAFi/MEKi combinations, regardless of prior lines of therapy, were included unless concurrently receiving immune checkpoint inhibition. The “ramp-up” regimen involves a 25% dose of BRAFi and 50% dose of MEKi, which is gradually increased over 4 weekly intervals until full dose is achieved. Pts started on full-dose BRAFi/MEKi were included as a comparison arm. Observations included 1) demographics, 2) treatment regimens and disruptions, 3) rate and severity of AEs, 4) outcomes including best overall response rates (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 88 pts were analyzed (21 and 35 receiving “ramp-up” BRAFi/MEKi in the adjuvant and advanced (unresectable stage III or stage IV) setting, respectively, and 32 received full-dose (non-ramp-up) BRAFi/MEKi in the advanced setting). Demographics were similar except pts in the “ramp-up” cohorts were higher in average age (62.0 vs 56.0, p = 0.032) than pts starting at full-dose. Pts receiving adjuvant BRAFi/MEKi at “ramp-up” dosing exhibited a 4.8% (n = 1) rate of grade 3 or higher (Gr3+) AEs and 33.3% (n = 7) AE-related discontinuation rate (9.9 month average time to discontinuation). In the advanced setting, “ramp-up” vs full-dose treated pts exhibited Gr3+ AE rates of 25.7% (n = 9) vs 43.8% (n = 14; p = 0.197) and AE-related discontinuation rates of 34.4% (n = 12) vs 40.6% (n = 13; p = 0.592), respectively. Trends in overall AEs, ORR, PFS, and OS were similar to historical observations across all groups. Conclusions: This real-world analysis suggests that “ramp-up” incremental dosing of BRAFi/MEKi for pts with melanoma in the adjuvant and advanced setting may improve the tolerance and toxicity profiles of these agents without compromising their clinical efficacy, and may be of particular utility in pts with advanced age.

Randomized phase 3 trial of IO102-IO103 plus pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab alone in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, or metastatic melanoma

TPS9589

Background: The treatment of melanoma has improved markedly with the emergence of new immune therapies, and both anti-PD-1 monotherapy and the combination of the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab and anti-CTLA-4 therapy ipilimumab are now considered standard-of-care in the unresectable or metastatic (advanced) melanoma setting. However, many patients have primary or acquired resistance to these therapies, thereby underpinning the need for more effective approaches. IO102-IO103 is a potentially first-in-class, dual-antigen, immune-modulatory therapy targeting the key cancer immune resistance pathways mediated by IDO and PD-L1. The ability of IO102 and IO103 to respectively activate the specific T cells that recognize these checkpoint molecules and directly modulate immune regulation has previously been demonstrated both preclinically and in human clinical trials. A synergistic anti-tumor response upon treatment against both IDO and PD-L1 has also previously been demonstrated in a preclinical model where IDO and PD-L1 were expressed by different cells in the tumor microenvironment. Due to the distinctive mechanisms of action of IO102-IO103 and anti-PD-1 antibodies, there may be a further synergistic effect when treatment is combined. A previous Phase 1/2 trial investigating the use of IO102-IO103 plus nivolumab in patients with anti-PD-1-naïve metastatic melanoma has demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity with an overall response rate (ORR) of 80%, median progression-free survival (PFS) of 26 months and a manageable safety profile (NCT03047928; Kjeldsen et al, Nat Med 2021). Methods: This is a Phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized, 2-arm trial investigating the efficacy and safety of IO102-IO103 plus pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab alone (EudraCT: 2021-004594-32; ClinicalTrials.gov No: NCT05155254). Inclusion criteria include: adult patients with untreated, unresectable (Stage III), or metastatic (Stage IV) melanoma; > 6 months since last dose of (neo)adjuvant treatment with targeted or immune therapy (in those previously treated); and ≥1 measurable lesion by RECIST v1.1. Primary endpoint is PFS by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints include ORR, durable response rate, complete response rate, duration of response, time to response, disease control rate, overall survival, and safety/tolerability. Target enrollment is 300 patients at > 100 sites in 20 countries. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive either pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks up to 2 years or pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks up to 2 years with dual-antigen IO103-IO102 85-85 µg and Montanide adjuvant subcutaneously on Day 1 and 8 of cycle 1 and 2 and on Day 1 of each cycle thereafter. Enrolment for the study is ongoing. Clinical trial information: EudraCT: 2021-004594-32; ClinicalTrials.gov No: NCT05155254.

A deep learning approach utilizing clinical and molecular data for identifying prognostic biomarkers in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: An ORIEN pan-cancer study

2619

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have made significant improvements in the treatment of cancer patients (pts), but many continue to experience primary or secondary resistance. Here, we leveraged clinical and genomic data to identify prognostic biomarkers in pts treated with ICIs utilizing a pan-cancer approach. Methods: Pts were enrolled to the Total Cancer Care protocol across 18 cancer centers within the Oncology Research Information Exchange Network (ORIEN). RNA-seq was performed on tumors following the RSEM pipeline and gene expressions were quantified as Transcript Per Million (TPM) and were logarithmically normalized. An Auto-Encoder Survival Deep Network (AE-SDN) architecture was developed that combined the reconstruction loss of AE with Cox regression for modeling time to event. For comparison, immunoscore for each pt was calculated based on the estimated densities of tumor CD3+ and CD8+ T cells (Galon, 2020) utilizing CIBERSORTx. The quality of overall survival (OS) predictions was assessed using Harrell’s concordance index (C-index). Log-rank test was used to assess stratified group differences (by ICI or cancer histology) along with Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis of AE-SDN and immunoscore. Results: Pts (n=522) with 4 cancer types including melanoma (n=125), renal cell carcinoma (n=149), non-small cell lung cancer (n=128) and head and neck cancer (n=120) treated with 6 ICI regimens were included in this analysis. ICI regimens were nivolumab (n=219), pembrolizumab (n=202), ipilimumab+nivolumab (n=69), ipilimumab (n=30), avelumab (n=1) and cemiplimab (n=1). The Table summarizes the overall C-index and associated 95% CIs and log-rank P values for the entire cohort (regardless of histology) resulting from our proposed AE-SDN model and the separate estimated immunoscore categorization. AE-SDN top selected genes were mostly related to immunity, carcinogenesis and tumor suppression. The corresponding KM plots showed significantly wider separations of the survival curves in favor of our proposed AE-SDN model relative to the immunoscore with more than 20% improvement in prediction power. Conclusions: Deep network machine learning analysis is a promising approach to identifying relevant prognostic biomarkers in cancer pts treated with ICI. This may lead to novel therapeutic predictive signatures and identification of mechanisms of ICI resistance. Our AE-SDN gene expression signature was significantly prognostic and outperformed the estimated CD3+, CD8+ T Cell immunoscore. Further refinements to our prediction power are ongoing along with more advanced neural network architectures to elucidate related functional pathways. [Table: see text]

The "Great Debate" at Melanoma Bridge 2021, December 2nd-4th, 2021

The Great Debate session at the 2021 Melanoma Bridge virtual congress (December 2-4) featured counterpoint views from experts on seven important issues in melanoma. The debates considered the use of adoptive cell therapy versus use of bispecific antibodies, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitors versus immunotherapy in the adjuvant setting, whether the use of corticosteroids for the management of side effects have an impact on outcomes, the choice of programmed death (PD)-1 combination therapy with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen (CTLA)-4 or lymphocyte-activation gene (LAG)-3, whether radiation is needed for brain metastases, when lymphadenectomy should be integrated into the treatment plan and then the last debate, telemedicine versus face-to-face. As with previous Bridge congresses, the debates were assigned by meeting Chairs and positions taken by experts during the debates may not have necessarily reflected their respective personal view. Audiences voted both before and after each debate.

Managing Metastatic Melanoma in 2022: A Clinical Review

Cutaneous melanoma remains the most lethal of the primary cutaneous neoplasms, and although the incidence of primary melanoma continues to rise, the mortality from metastatic disease remains unchanged, in part through advances in treatment. Major developments in immunomodulatory and targeted therapies have provided robust improvements in response and survival trends that have transformed the clinical management of patients with metastatic melanoma. Additional advances in immunologic and cancer cell biology have contributed to further optimization in (1) risk stratification, (2) prognostication, (3) treatment, (4) toxicity management, and (5) surveillance approaches for patients with an advanced melanoma diagnosis. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the historical and future advances regarding the translational and clinical implications of advanced melanoma and share multidisciplinary recommendations to aid clinicians in the navigation of current treatment approaches for a variety of patient cohorts.

The "Great Debate" at Immunotherapy Bridge 2021, December 1st-2nd, 2021

As part of the 2021 Immunotherapy Bridge virtual congress (December 1–2, Naples, Italy), the Great Debate sessions featured experts who were assigned counter opposing views on four important questions in immunotherapy today. The first topic was whether oncolytic viruses or other specific immunomodulators were the more promising approach for intralesional therapy. The second was whether early surrogate endpoints, such as response rate or progression-free survival, correlate with long-term overall survival was considered. Thirdly, whether vaccines can transform cold into hot tumors was discussed and, finally, broad versus deep analytic profiling approaches to gain insights into immune-oncology development were compared. As with previous Bridge congresses, presenters were invited by the meeting Chairs and positions taken during the debates may not have reflected their respective personal view. In addition, the views summarised in this article are based on available evidence but may reflect personal interpretation of these data, clinical experience and subjective opinion of the speaker.

CSF1 receptor inhibition of tenosynovial giant cell tumor using novel disease-specific MRI measures of tumor burden

Aim: Monitoring treatment of tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is complicated by the irregular shape and asymmetrical growth of the tumor. We compared responses to pexidartinib by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 with those by tumor volume score (TVS) and modified RECIST (m-RECIST). Materials & methods: MRIs acquired every two cycles were assessed centrally using RECIST 1.1, m-RECIST and TVS and tissue damage score (TDS). Results: Thirty-one evaluable TGCT patients were treated with pexidartinib. From baseline to last visit, 94% of patients (29/31) showed a decrease in tumor size (median change: -60% [RECIST], -66% [m-RECIST], -79% [TVS]). All methods showed 100% disease control rate. For TDS, improvements were seen in bone erosion (32%), bone marrow edema (58%) and knee effusion (46%). Conclusion: TVS and m-RECIST offer potentially superior alternatives to conventional RECIST for monitoring disease progression and treatment response in TGCT. TDS adds important information about joint damage associated with TGCT.

Results from Phase I Extension Study Assessing Pexidartinib Treatment in Six Cohorts with Solid Tumors including TGCT, and Abnormal CSF1 Transcripts in TGCT

PURPOSE

To assess the response to pexidartinib treatment in six cohorts of adult patients with advanced, incurable solid tumors associated with colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) and/or KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase activity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From this two-part phase I, multicenter study, pexidartinib, a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets CSF1R, KIT, and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3), was evaluated in six adult patient cohorts (part 2, extension) with advanced solid tumors associated with dysregulated CSF1R. Adverse events, pharmacokinetics, and tumor responses were assessed for all patients; patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) were also evaluated for tumor volume score (TVS) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO). CSF1 transcripts and gene expression were explored in TGCT biopsies.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients were treated: TGCT patients (n = 39) had a median treatment duration of 511 days, while other solid tumor patients (n = 52) had a median treatment duration of 56 days. TGCT patients had response rates of 62% (RECIST 1.1) and 56% (TVS) for the full analysis set. PRO assessments for pain showed improvement in patient symptoms, and 76% (19/25) of TGCT tissue biopsy specimens showed evidence of abnormal CSF1 transcripts. Pexidartinib treatment of TGCT resulted in tumor regression and symptomatic benefit in most patients. Pexidartinib toxicity was manageable over the entire study.

CONCLUSIONS

These results offer insight into outcome patterns in cancers whose biology suggests use of a CSF1R inhibitor. Pexidartinib results in tumor regression in TGCT patients, providing prolonged control with an acceptable safety profile.

Targeting wild-type TP53 using AMG 232 in combination with MAPK inhibition in Metastatic Melanoma; a phase 1 study

BACKGROUND

Targeting the MDM2-p53 interaction using AMG 232 is synergistic with MAPK inhibitors (MAPKi) in preclinical melanoma models. We postulated that AMG 232 plus MAPKi is safe and more effective than MAPKi alone in TP53-wild type, MAPKi-naïve metastatic melanoma.

METHODS

Patients were treated with increasing (120 mg, 180 mg, 240 mg) oral doses of AMG 232 (seven-days-on, 15-days-off, 21-day cycle) plus dabrafenib (D) and trametinib (T) (Arm 1, BRAFV600-mutant) or T alone (Arm 2, BRAFV600-wild type). Patients were treated for seven days with AMG 232 alone before adding T±D. Safety and efficacy were assessed using CTCAE v4.0 and RECIST v1.1 criteria, respectively. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was performed at baseline and steady-state levels for AMG 232.

RESULTS

31 patients were enrolled. Ten and 21 patients were enrolled in Arm 1 and Arm 2, respectively. The most common AMG 232-related adverse events (AEs) were nausea (87%), diarrhea (77%), and fatigue (74%). Seven patients (23%) were withdrawn from the study due to AMG 232-related AEs. Three dose-limiting AEs occurred (Arm 1, 180 mg, nausea; Arm 2, 240 mg, grade 3 pulmonary embolism; Arm 2, 180 mg, grade 4 thrombocytopenia). AMG 232 PK exposures were not altered when AMG 232 was combined with T±D. Objective responses were seen in 8/10 (Arm 1) and 3/20 (Arm 2) evaluable patients. The median progression-free survival for Arm 1 and Arm 2 was 19.0 months-not reached and 2.8 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The maximum tolerated dose of AMG 232 for both arms was 120 mg. AMG 232 plus T±D exhibited a favorable PK profile. Although objective responses occurred in both arms, adding AMG 232 to T±D did not confer additional clinical benefit.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Squamous Cell Skin Cancer, Version 1.2022

The NCCN Guidelines for Squamous Cell Skin Cancer provide recommendations for diagnostic workup, clinical stage, and treatment options for patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. The NCCN panel meets annually to discuss updates to the guidelines based on comments from panel members and the Institutional Review, as well as submissions from within NCCN and external organizations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the introduction of a new surgical recommendation terminology (peripheral and deep en face margin assessment), as well as recent updates on topical prophylaxis, immunotherapy for regional and metastatic disease, and radiation therapy.