Intraocular pressure effects of common topical steroids for post-cataract inflammation: are they all the same?

Loteprednol etabonate (submicron) ophthalmic gel 0.38% dosed three times daily following cataract surgery: integrated analysis of two Phase III clinical studies

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a submicron formulation of loteprednol etabonate (LE) gel 0.38% instilled three times daily (TID) compared with vehicle for the treatment of inflammation and pain following cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation, integrated across two multicenter, double-masked, randomized, parallel-group, Phase III studies.

Patients and methods

Subjects ≥18 years of age with anterior chamber (AC) cells ≥grade 2 (6-15 cells) on day 1 after cataract surgery were randomized to receive 1 drop of LE gel 0.38% TID, twice daily (not reported/analyzed herein), or vehicle instilled in the study eye for 14 days. Primary endpoints were the proportion of subjects with resolution of AC cells and grade 0 (no) pain at postoperative day 8. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs), ocular signs, fundoscopy results, visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), and tolerability (drop comfort and ocular symptoms).

Results

The integrated intent-to-treat population included 742 subjects (LE gel 0.38% TID, n=371; vehicle, n=371). Significantly more subjects in the LE gel 0.38% TID group compared with the vehicle group had complete resolution of AC cells (29.6% vs 15.1%) and grade 0 pain (74.4% vs 48.8%) at day 8 (P<0.0001 for both). LE gel 0.38% TID was safe and well tolerated, with only 1 LE-treated subject experiencing an IOP elevation ≥10 mm Hg. Most treatment-related AEs were mild and occurred less frequently with LE gel 0.38% than with vehicle. The majority (>75%) of subjects in each treatment group reported no drop discomfort. There were no reports of blurred vision with LE gel.

Conclusion

The results of this integrated analysis indicate that LE (submicron) gel 0.38% administered TID is safe and effective for the treatment of ocular inflammation and pain following cataract surgery, with minimal risk of IOP elevation.

Dry Eye Disease: A Review of Epidemiology in Taiwan, and its Clinical Treatment and Merits

Dry eye disease (DED) has become common on a global scale in recent years. There is a wide prevalence of DED in different countries based on various ethnicities and environment. DED is a multifactorial ocular disorder. In addition to advanced age and gender, such factors as living at high altitude, smoking, pterygium, prolonged use of consumer electronics or overingesting of caffeine or multivitamins are considered to be the major risk factors of DED. We report the DED epidemiology in Taiwan firstly in this article. According to the pathophysiological factors and changes inthe composition of the tear film in DED, it can be categorized into several subtypes, including lipid anomaly dry eye, aqueous tear deficiency, allergic and toxic dry eye among others. Each subtype has its own cause and disease management; therefore, it is important for ophthalmologists to identify the type through literature review and investigation. The management of DED, relies not only on traditional medications such as artificial tears, gels and ointments, but also newer treatment options such as acupuncture, SYL1001, and nanomedicine therapy. We also conducted a comprehensive literature review including common subtypes and treatment of DED. Clearly, more clinical trials are needed to assess the efficacy and safety of the various treatments and common subtypes of DED.

Real world use of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic gel 0.5% in cases representative of comorbid pathologies responding to minimally invasive glaucoma surgery

Purpose

With the increasing use of minimally invasive surgical techniques for intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering in glaucoma patients, there is a need to examine best practices regarding the postoperative management of these patients. Corticosteroids, though effective in controlling postoperative ocular pain and inflammation, present distinct challenges in glaucoma surgery patients, as their use can be associated with IOP elevation. Loteprednol etabonate (LE) is an ocular corticosteroid designed to have an improved safety profile relative to other corticosteroids.

Methods

We report here a representative selection of cases in which patients were successfully treated with LE ophthalmic gel 0.5% (LE gel) following a variety of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) procedures. Cases included patients undergoing various procedures including a Trabectome combined with cataract surgery; micro-stent surgery (iStent) combined with cataract surgery; supraciliary CyPass Micro-Stent placement combined with cataract surgery; Kahook Dual Blade goniotomy; and ab interno canaloplasty using the iTrack catheter.

Observations

In all cases, use of LE gel during the postoperative period appeared effective and safe in reducing inflammation and controlling pain. No adverse events or IOP elevations were noted, even in those patients continuing use of LE gel past the postoperative period for longer than six months with documented follow-up. In two cases, patients with elevated IOP using either prednisolone or difluprednate postoperatively were switched to LE gel, with a subsequent reduction in IOP.

Conclusions

This selection of cases involving patients undergoing MIGS suggests that LE gel may be an effective and safe option for treating postoperative inflammation and pain following such procedures with minimal to no effect on IOP or other negative sequalae.

Rheological Properties, Dissolution Kinetics, and Ocular Pharmacokinetics of Loteprednol Etabonate (Submicron) Ophthalmic Gel 0.38

Purpose: To evaluate rheological properties, in vitro dissolution, and in vivo ocular pharmacokinetics of loteprednol etabonate (LE) (submicron) ophthalmic gel 0.38%. Methods: The viscosity of the LE gel 0.38% formulation was measured with a controlled stress rheometer. Dissolution kinetics were evaluated in a fixed-volume and flow-through assay. Rabbits received a single instillation of LE (submicron) gel 0.38% (both eyes), and concentrations of LE in ocular tissues were determined through 24 h by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Where indicated, comparators included micronized LE gel 0.38%, 0.5% (Lotemax® gel), and 0.75%. Results: LE (submicron) gel 0.38% exhibited shear-thinning characteristics similar to LE gel 0.5% with nearly identical yield stress. LE (submicron) gel 0.38% released 2.6-fold more LE into the dissolution medium than micronized LE gel 0.5% over 30 s in the fixed-volume dissolution assay, and submicron LE attained higher concentrations of dissolved LE than micronized LE gel 0.38% in the flow-through dissolution assay. In rabbits, the maximal concentration and area-under-the-curve over 24 h for LE in aqueous humor were 2.5- and 1.8-fold higher, respectively, for LE (submicron) gel 0.38% versus micronized LE gel 0.5% (both P < 0.001). Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar for most other tissues. Conclusions: LE (submicron) gel 0.38% demonstrated similar rheological properties to micronized LE gel 0.5% but faster dissolution, thus providing similar or higher LE concentrations in the aqueous humor, cornea, and iris-ciliary body after ocular dosing in rabbits despite a lowered concentration of drug in the formulation.

Modulation of Inflammation-Related Genes in the Cornea of a Mouse Model of Dry Eye upon Treatment with Cyclosporine Eye Drops

Purpose/Aim: Inflammation is recognized as playing an etiological role in dry eye disease. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of various topical cyclosporine A (CsA) formulations on cornea inflammatory markers in a mouse model of dry eye.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Six- to 7-week-old mice treated with scopolamine were housed in a controlled environment room to induce dry eye. Following dry eye confirmation by corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), the mice were treated three times a day with: 0.05%CsA (Restasis, Allergan), 0.1%CsA (Ikervis, Santen), 1%CsA oil solution, and 0.5% loteprednol etabonate (LE, Lotemax, Baush+Lomb), or left untreated. Aqueous tear production and CFS scores were assessed during the treatment period, and corneas were collected to measure the expression profile of a selection of inflammatory genes.

RESULTS

After 7 days of treatment, the CFS scores were reduced by 21%, 31%, and 44% with 0.05%CsA, 0.1%CsA, and 1%CsA eye drops, respectively. By contrast, 0.5% LE did not decrease corneal fluorescein staining at day 10. A statistically significant dose-dependent CFS reduction was observed only between the 0.05% and 1%CsA formulations. The gene expression profiles indicated that 12, 18, 17 genes were downregulated by 0.05%CsA, 0.1%CsA, 1%CsA, respectively. Among them, the genes significantly downregulated were: IL1A, IL1R1, and TLR4 with 0.05%CsA; H2-Eb1, IL1A, IL1B, IL1RN, IL6, TGFB2, TGFB3, TLR2, TLR3, and TLR4 with 0.1%CsA; IL1B, IL6, TGFB3, and TLR4 with 1%CsA. TGFB1 and TGFBR1 were the only genes upregulated in all groups, but only TGFB1 upregulation reached significance. IL6RA was significantly upregulated by 0.05%CsA.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that the three CsA formulations effectively modulated TLR4, TGFβ1, IL1, and IL6 pathways to reduce corneal epithelium lesions in a mouse model of severe dry eye. The study also suggests that the different anti-inflammatory eye drops modulated inflammatory genes in a slightly different manner.

Comparison of Efficacy of Difluprednate 0.05% and Loteprednol Gel 0.5% After Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes and complications of topical difluprednate 0.05% and loteprednol gel 0.5% after routine cataract surgery.

METHODS

Subjects received either difluprednate emulsion 0.05% (n=30 eyes) or loteprednol gel 0.5% (n=30 eyes) after routine cataract surgery. Topical steroid drops were initiated 3 days before cataract surgery and continued for 2 weeks postoperatively. Anterior chamber (AC) cell grade, corneal edema, corneal pachymetry, visual acuity, ocular surface quality (Oxford scale), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were evaluated at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively.

RESULTS

Patients treated with difluprednate or loteprednol had statistically similar resolution of their AC cell grade and corneal edema at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively (P>0.05 at each study visit). Difluprednate-treated and loteprednol-treated eyes achieved a mean best-corrected visual acuity of at least 20/25 by 1 week postoperatively (0.055 and 0.061 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, respectively; P=0.82). The nasal ocular surface quality at 1 week had improved in loteprednol-treated eyes compared with difluprednate-treated eyes (1.0 vs. 1.9 Oxford score, respectively; P<0.001), but similar at all other visits. There was no statistical difference between IOP levels between both treatment groups (P>0.05). In the difluprednate-treated group, one patient developed rebound inflammation and two patients developed cystoid macular edema at their 1-month postoperative visit.

CONCLUSIONS

The anti-inflammatory effect, visual recovery, and IOP of patients using topical difluprednate or loteprednol gel after cataract surgery are equivalent. There may be an additional short-term benefit of loteprednol gel in protecting the ocular surface after cataract surgery.

Bioequivalence Study Methods with Pharmacokinetic Endpoints for Topical Ophthalmic Corticosteroid Suspensions and Effects of Subject Demographics

PURPOSE

To establish bioequivalence for topical ophthalmic corticosteroid suspensions, some of U.S. product-specific guidances (PSGs) for generic drug products recommend evaluation of aqueous humor (AH) pharmacokinetics (PK). However, the AH PK study is complex because the relationships among AH PK, subject demographics, ocular anatomy, physiology and the compounds' physicochemical characteristics are not well understood. The objective of this research is to provide an overview of the in vivo human AH studies submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for ophthalmic corticosteroid suspensions and to investigate the impact of subject demographics on the human AH PK.

METHODS

We summarized demographic data, sampling time points, sample size per time point and PK parameters to investigate correlations in the studies submitted to the FDA.

RESULTS

In the evaluation of subject-specific covariates, the area under the concentration-time curves (AUC) and maximum concentrations (C_max) were significantly different among ethnicities and age groups. Gender was not primarily associated with differences in AH PK.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the difference in ethnicity and age of the study population play an important role in the AH PK profiles of topical ophthalmic corticosteroid suspensions. Considering the subject-specific covariate effects in designing bioequivalence studies with AH PK endpoints could reduce bias from covariate imbalance and help identify true effects of formulation differences.

Intracameral dexamethasone injection in the treatment of cataract surgery induced inflammation: design, development, and place in therapy

Cataract surgery is one of the most commonly performed surgeries worldwide, with nearly 20 million cases annually. Appropriate prophylaxis after cataract surgery can contribute to a safe and quick visual recovery with high patient satisfaction. Despite being the current standard of care, the use of multiple postoperative eye drops can create a significant burden on these patients, contributing to documented and significant non-adherence to the postoperative regimen. Over the past 25 years, there have been a few studies analyzing the use of intracameral dexamethasone (DXM) in controlling inflammation following cataract surgery. This review explores various drug delivery approaches for managing intraocular inflammation after cataract surgery, documenting the strengths and weaknesses of these options and examining the role of intracameral DXM (among these other strategies) in controlling postoperative intraocular inflammation. Intracameral DXM has a particular advantage over topical steroids in possibly decreasing postoperative inflammatory symptoms and objective anterior cell and flare scores. Compared to topical steroids, there may be a slightly less theoretical risk of significant intraocular pressure spikes and systemic absorption. In addition, surveys indicate patients prefer an intraoperative intracameral injection over a self-administered postoperative eye drop regimen. However, there are several adverse effects associated with intracameral DXM delivery that are not seen with the noninvasive topical approach. Although it is unlikely that intracameral DXM will replace topical medications as the standard management for postoperative inflammation, it is seemingly another safe and effective strategy for controlling postoperative inflammation after routine cataract surgery.

Risk factors for early onset elevated intraocular pressure after pterygium surgery

Purpose

In this study, we aimed to identify the risk factors for early postoperative elevation of intraocular pressure (IOP) after pterygium surgery.

Patients and methods

All patients in this retrospective cohort study were evaluated for inclusion from a single tertiary care center at Boston Medical Center. Their pre- and postoperative IOP measurements (day 1, week 1, month 1, month 3, and when clinically necessary) were compared. Patients with postoperative IOP measurement of >22 mmHg or with an increase in IOP by ≥10 mmHg compared with the preoperative measurement value were grouped as “Ocular Hypertension” group; otherwise, patients were grouped in the “No Ocular Hypertension” group. Age, sex, race, baseline IOP, cup-to-disc (C/D) ratio, history of glaucoma, and frequency of use of postoperative steroid drops in all patients were compared. Chi square test was performed to compare the categorical variables, whereas Student’s t-test was performed to compare continuous variables. We performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis of categorical data with a significance level of p < 0.05.

Results

In total, 240 patient charts were reviewed for inclusion in this study. Twenty-six patients required pterygium surgery on both eyes; for these patients, the eye with higher IOP was analyzed. Two patients were discontinued from this study because of elevated IOP in the contralateral, nonsurgical eye. Fortyeight out of 212 eyes (22.64%) developed postsurgical elevation of IOP within the first 3 months of operation. No significant differences were found between age, sex, baseline IOP, C/D ratio, history of glaucoma diagnoses, and frequency of use of postoperative steroid drops. However, Hispanic/Latino race (p = 0.036) and lack of application of steroid ointment (p = 0.001) were found to be the significant risk factors for the development of “Ocular Hypertension” in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Early elevation of IOP is a risk of pterygium surgery. One nonmodifiable risk factor, Hispanic/Latino race, and one modifiable risk factor, lack of application of steroid ointments, were identified as potential causes of early postoperative IOP elevation.

Comparison between Betamethasone, Fluorometholone and Loteprednol Etabonate on intraocular pressure in patients after keratorefractive surgery

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare the ocular hypertensive effect of the commercially available Betamethasone, Fluorometholone in Iran and Loteprednol Etabonate in patients undergoing keratorefractive surgery.

Methods

In this prospective randomized clinical trial, 300 eyes of 150 patients were included, and patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups and used one of the 3 steroid drops (Betamethasone 0.1%, Fluorometholone 0.1%, and Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5%) after myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured 2, 4, and 6 weeks post-surgery. Twenty-two mmHg was set as the threshold IOP for starting anti-glaucoma medication and tapering steroid drops.

Results

Of 300 eyes from 150 patients over the first 6 postoperative weeks, 2 eyes in Fluorometholone group (2%), 12 eyes in Betamethasone group (12%), and 16 eyes in Loteprednol group (16%) had IOP equal or more than 22 mmHg. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test showed that the rise in IOP was significantly different between groups in the 2nd and 4th (P ≤ 0.001) postoperative weeks but not at 6th week (P = 0.230). An IOP rise equal or more than 10 mmHg was detected in 13 and 15 eyes in Betamethasone and Loteprednol groups, respectively. None of the eyes in Fluorometholone group had such an IOP rise.

Conclusions

Loteprednol and Fluorometholone were associated with the most and least increase in IOP, respectively. The highest pressures were detected 4 weeks after surgery in the Betamethasone and Loteprednol groups and 6 weeks after surgery in the Fluorometholone group. Fluorometholone was the safest among the three examined steroid drops in terms of IOP rise.

Outcome of fixed volume intracameral sodium hyaluronate 1.4% injection for early postoperative hypotony after Baerveldt glaucoma implant

IMPORTANCE

Using an ophthalmic viscoelastic device to manage early postoperative hypotony after Baerveldt glaucoma implant (BGI).

BACKGROUND

To determine the outcome of intracameral sodium hyaluronate injection for early postoperative hypotony treatment after BGI.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

PARTICIPANTS

One-hundred-and-thirty-eight patients (176 eyes) had BGI from January 2012 to November 2015. Those who had hypotony within 3 months postoperatively were studied.

METHODS

Hypotonous eyes were injected with 0.1 mL sodium hyaluronate 1.4% intracameral on the slit-lamp. The patients were followed up weekly and the injection repeated up to 3 times if hypotony persisted. The tube was tied surgically as a last resort.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The intraocular pressure and best-corrected visual acuity at week 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and month 4 were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty (17.0%) out of 176 eyes developed early postoperative hypotony. The median intraocular pressure and median best-corrected visual acuity when hypotony first presented were 3 mmHg and 0.8 logMAR. Two eyes were excluded as they had more than 0.1 mL injection. Eight (29%) of the 28 hypotonous eyes resolved after one injection, seven (25%) required two and 10 (36%) needed three injections. Three (11%) eyes had surgical tube tie. The median intraocular pressures were 5, 7, 8, 10, 11 and 13 mmHg at week 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and month 4 post-injection. The median best-corrected visual acuity were 0.60, 0.50, 0.50, 0.45, 0.40 and 0.40 logMAR for the same period.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Standardised intracameral 0.1 mL sodium hyaluronate 1.4% is an effective and safe way to manage early postoperative hypotony after BGI.

Injectable drug depot engineered to release multiple ophthalmic therapeutic agents with precise time profiles for postoperative treatment following ocular surgery

A multi-drug delivery platform is developed to address current shortcomings of post-operative ocular drug delivery. The sustained biodegradable drug release system is composed of biodegradable polymeric microparticles (MPs) incorporated into a bulk biodegradable hydrogel made from triblock copolymers with poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) center blocks and hydrophobic biodegradable polyester blocks such as poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), Poly(lactic acid) (PLA), or Poly(lactide-co-caprolactone) (PLCL) blocks. This system is engineered to flow as a liquid solution at room temperature for facile injection into the eye and then quickly gel as it warms to physiological body temperatures (approximately 37 °C). The hydrogel acts as an ocular depot that can release three different drug molecules at programmed rates and times to provide optimal release of each species. In this manuscript, the hydrogel is configured to release a broad-spectrum antibiotic, a potent corticosteroid, and an ocular hypotensive, three ophthalmic therapeutic agents that are essential for post-operative management after ocular surgery, each drug released at its own timescale. The delivery platform is designed to mimic current topical application of postoperative ocular formulations, releasing the antibiotic for up to a week, and the corticosteroid and the ocular hypotensive agents for at least a month. Hydrophobic blocks, such as PLCL, were utilized to prolong the release duration of the biomolecules. This system also enables customization by being able to vary the initial drug loading to linearly tune the drug dose released, while maintaining a constant drug release profile over time. This minimally invasive biodegradable multi-drug delivery system is capable of replacing a complex ocular treatment regimen with a simple injection. Such a depot system has the potential to increase patient medication compliance and reduce both the immediate and late term complications following ophthalmic surgery.

STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE

After ocular surgery, patients routinely receive multiple medications including antibiotics, steroids and ocular hypotensives to ensure optimal surgical outcomes. The current standard of care for postoperative treatment after ocular surgery involves using eye drops daily, which has limited effectiveness mainly due to poor patient adherence. To improve patient experience and outcomes, this article presents the first thermoresponsive hydrogel able to release multiple drug molecules for the application of post-operative treatment following ocular surgery. By varying the parameters such as hydrogel type and polymer hydrophobicity, the drug release profile, duration and dosage can finely be tuned. The approach presented in this article can readily be applied to other applications by simply changing the drug loaded in the drug delivery system.

Loteprednol etabonate for inflammatory conditions of the anterior segment of the eye: twenty years of clinical experience with a retrometabolically designed corticosteroid

INTRODUCTION

Topical corticosteroids are an important pharmacotherapy for the management of various inflammatory conditions affecting the anterior segment of the eye. However, medications in this class are associated with well-known risks including increased intraocular pressure (IOP) and development of cataracts. The topical corticosteroid loteprednol etabonate (LE) was developed with the specific intention of minimizing these side effects.

AREAS COVERED

The focus of this review is to examine published efficacy and safety data for LE, a drug engineered to undergo rapid metabolism to inactive metabolites with the goal of improved safety. Two decades of clinical research focused on LE formulations are reviewed, including the use of LE in combination with tobramycin. The cumulative body of experience affirms the concept that the molecular design of LE confers certain safety benefits without compromising the desired anti-inflammatory efficacy of a topical corticosteroid.

EXPERT OPINION

Loteprednol etabonate is a mainstay for topical therapy of a wide variety of commonplace and niche conditions of the ocular surface and the anterior segment, including in the healing post-operative patient. Its versatility and safety allow eye care providers to recommend both acute induction as well as chronic maintenance therapy with appropriate follow-up.

A retrospective analysis of the use of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.5% following canaloplasty

Background

While loteprednol etabonate (LE) suspension 0.5% is approved for the treatment of postoperative ocular inflammation, there have been no reported studies of its use in glaucoma patients undergoing canaloplasty.

Methods

This was a retrospective medical chart review conducted at a single US center. Data were collected on patients with glaucoma who underwent canaloplasty with or without cataract surgery, and were prescribed LE suspension 0.5% postoperatively. Outcomes evaluated included postsurgical inflammation (anterior chamber [AC] cells and flare), intraocular pressure (IOP), number of IOP-lowering medications, and postsurgical complications.

Results

Data were collected on 204 patients (262 eyes) with a mean (SD) age of 71.6 (11.3) years. The most frequent LE dosing regimens at day 1, week 1, and month 1 postsurgery were QID (92.3%; 241/261), TID (52.6%; 133/253), and QD (65.5%; 78/119), respectively. Inflammation (AC flare and cells), mostly mild, was noted in 33.2% (86/259) of eyes on postoperative day 1 and 8.6% (21/244) of eyes at month 1. Mean IOP and mean number of IOP-lowering medications were significantly reduced from baseline (P<0.001) at all time points postoperatively. Complete (no IOP-lowering medication) or qualified (use of ≤2 IOP-lowering medications) surgical success was achieved in 78.8% and 90.6% of eyes, respectively, at month 6 and 63.4% and 92.7% of eyes at month 36. The most frequently observed postoperative complication was hyphema in 48.7% (126/259) eyes at day 1, which decreased to 0.4% (1/244) of eyes by month 1. IOP ≥30 mmHg was noted in 13 (5.3%) eyes at postoperative week 1 and rarely thereafter, and no patient discontinued therapy because of an IOP increase.

Conclusion

These real-world data suggest that canaloplasty with or without cataract surgery managed postoperatively with LE suspension 0.5% is effective and safe in the glaucoma patient.

EFFECT OF AN INTRAVITREAL DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT ON DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA AFTER CATARACT SURGERY

PURPOSE

To analyze the effects of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX; Ozurdex 700 μg; Allergan) administered immediately after cataract surgery in diabetic patients.

METHODS

This prospective, single-arm, open label study (NCT01748487 at ClinicalTrials.gov) involved Type 2 diabetic patients with at least mild diabetic retinopathy (DR) who underwent cataract surgery and DEX insertion after phacoemulsification, and intraocular lens implantation were enrolled. Best-corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness (CRT) measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography were recorded at 1 week preoperatively, and 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery. Adverse events were also recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-four eyes of 24 patients (17 [70.8%] men; mean age 63.7 ± 8.7 years) with mild nonproliferative DR (41.7%), moderate nonproliferative DR (33.3%), severe nonproliferative DR (16.7%), or treated proliferative DR (8.3%) were selected. After DEX treatment, mean CRT changed from 241.1 μm (95% confidence interval, 227.5-254.6 μm) at baseline to 236.9 μm (95% confidence interval, 223.9-249.9 μm) at 1 week (P = 0.09), 238.9 μm (95% confidence interval, 225.5-252.3 μm) at 1 month (P = 0.44), and 248 μm (95% confidence interval, 232.4-260.8 μm) at 3 months (P = 0.15). No eyes showed a postoperative increase >50 μm in the CRT at any visit. A 10% increase in CRT was found in 8.3% of eyes. Mean best-corrected visual acuity significantly improved from 0.37 (20/50) at baseline to 0.19 (20/30) at 1 week, 0.12 (20/25) at 1 month, and 0.12 (20/25) at 3 months (P < 0.001 for each comparison). Mean intraocular pressure before surgery was 13.8 mmHg, and none of the patients developed an intraocular pressure ≥22 mmHg at any visit. None of the patients developed any serious adverse events during the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

These short-term results suggest that a single DEX injection intraoperatively after phacoemulsification could avoid an increase in CRT after cataract surgery in diabetic patients.

Clinical Applications of Dexamethasone for Aged Eyes

The risk of severe eye problems has been found to increase significantly with age, particularly between the fifth and sixth decades of life. Cataracts, dry eye, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) are very common and very different age-related ocular diseases that reduce the patient's quality of life. The rationale for using corticosteroids to treat anterior and posterior ocular segment diseases is driven by inflammation. Dexamethasone, one of the most powerful corticosteroids available, is widely used for topical or intravitreal administration. Topical dexamethasone has proven efficacy for the management of postoperative inflammation in the anterior segment after cataract surgery and symptom relief in dry-eye disease. A new sustained-release 700 µg dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX) was recently approved for the treatment of macular edema following RVO, diabetic macular edema, or non-infectious uveitis, and its use is increasing, especially when other therapeutic agents have failed. The most common side effects are increased intraocular pressure and cataract formation. The potency of DEX, alone or in combination with other agents, makes DEX a promising option for treating several retinal diseases.

Small-molecule inhibition of Wnt signaling abrogates dexamethasone-induced phenotype of primary human trabecular meshwork cells

Trabecular meshwork (TM) cells are the governing regulators of the TM structure. When the functionality of these cells is impaired, the structure of the TM is perturbed which often results in increased ocular hypertension. High intraocular pressure is the most significant risk factor for steroid-induced glaucoma. Dexamethasone (Dex)-induced phenotype of TM cells is widely utilized as a model system to gain insight into mechanisms underlying damaged TM in glaucoma. In this study, to assess the possible role of abnormal Wnt signaling in steroid-induced glaucoma, we analyzed the effects of small-molecule Wnt signaling modulators on Dex-induced expression extracellular matrix proteins of primary human TM cells. While Dex-treated TM cells exhibited increased collagen and fibronectin expression, we found that Wnt signaling inhibitor 3235-0367 suppressed these Dex-induced effects. We therefore propose that Wnt signaling plays an important role in Dex-mediated impairment of TM cell functions. Moreover, the use of small-molecule Wnt signaling inhibitors to treat TM cells may provide an opportunity of restoring TM tissue in steroid-induced glaucoma.

Therapeutic potential of AAV-mediated MMP-3 secretion from corneal endothelium in treating glaucoma

Intraocular pressure (IOP) is maintained as a result of the balance between production of aqueous humour (AH) by the ciliary processes and hydrodynamic resistance to its outflow through the conventional outflow pathway comprising the trabecular meshwork (TM) and Schlemm's canal (SC). Elevated IOP, which can be caused by increased resistance to AH outflow, is a major risk factor for open-angle glaucoma. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) contribute to conventional aqueous outflow homeostasis in their capacity to remodel extracellular matrices, which has a direct impact on aqueous outflow resistance and IOP. We observed decreased MMP-3 activity in human glaucomatous AH compared to age-matched normotensive control AH. Treatment with glaucomatous AH resulted in significantly increased transendothelial resistance of SC endothelial and TM cell monolayers and reduced monolayer permeability when compared to control AH, or supplemented treatment with exogenous MMP-3.Intracameral inoculation of AAV-2/9 containing a CMV-driven MMP-3 gene (AAV-MMP-3) into wild type mice resulted in efficient transduction of corneal endothelium and an increase in aqueous concentration and activity of MMP-3. Most importantly, AAV-mediated expression of MMP-3 increased outflow facility and decreased IOP, and controlled expression using an inducible promoter activated by topical administration of doxycycline achieved the same effect. Ultrastructural analysis of MMP-3 treated matrices by transmission electron microscopy revealed remodelling and degradation of core extracellular matrix components. These results indicate that periodic induction, via use of an eye drop, of AAV-mediated secretion of MMP-3 into AH could have therapeutic potential for those cases of glaucoma that are sub-optimally responsive to conventional pressure-reducing medications.

Subconjunctival injectable dendrimer-dexamethasone gel for the treatment of corneal inflammation

Corneal inflammation is often encountered as a key pathological event in many corneal diseases. Current treatments involve topical corticosteroids which require frequent instillations due to rapid tear turnover, causing side-effects such as corneal toxicity and elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Hence, new interventions that can reduce side effects, dosing frequency, and increase patient compliance can be highly beneficial. In this study, we explore a subconjunctival injectable gel based on G4-PAMAM dendrimer and hyaluronic acid, cross-linked using thiol-ene click chemistry, incorporated with dendrimer dexamethasone (D-Dex) conjugates as a potential strategy for sustained delivery and enhanced bioavailability of corticosteroids. The efficacy of the injectable gel formulation was evaluated in a rat mild alkali burn model. Fluorescently-labelled dendrimers (D-Cy5) incorporated in the gel release D-Cy5 in vivo. The released D-Cy5 selectively targets and localizes within corneal macrophages in inflamed rat cornea but not in healthy controls. This pathology dependent biodistribution was exploited for drug delivery, by incorporating D-Dex in the injectable gel. The attenuation of corneal inflammation by D-Dex gels was assessed using various clinical and biochemical parameters over a 2-week period. Subconjunctival D-Dex gel treatment resulted in favorable clinically-relevant outcomes with reduced central corneal thickness and improved corneal clarity compared to free-Dex and placebo gel controls. The extent of corneal neovascularization was significantly reduced in the D-Dex group. These findings suggest that D-Dex attenuates corneal inflammation more effectively than free-Dex by attenuating macrophage infiltration and pro-inflammatory cytokines expression. A significant elevation in IOP was not observed in the D-Dex group but was observed in the free-Dex group. This novel injectable D-Dex gel may be a potential drug delivery platform for the treatment of many inflammatory ocular surface disorders such as dry eye, auto-immune keratitis and post-surgical complications where frequent steroid administration is required.

Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5%/Tobramycin 0.3% with Dexamethasone 0.1%/Tobramycin 0.3% Following Strabismus Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To compare the anti-inflammatory efficacy and safety of 0.5% loteprednol etabonate/0.3% tobramycin (LE/T) and 0.1% dexamethasone/0.3% tobramycin (DM/T) ophthalmic suspensions following strabismus surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of 40 patients who were treated with either LE/T or DM/T following strabismus surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The recorded signs and symptoms of inflammation and intraocular pressure of the patients at 1 day, 1 week, and 3 weeks after the surgery were evaluated and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

In both groups, reduced inflammation was noted during the follow-up visits. There was no statistically significant difference between the LE/T and DM/T groups with regard to the postoperative scores or measurements, including discomfort, chemosis, secretion, conjunctival hyperemia, and conjunctival gap size (p>0.05), during the follow-up visits. Allergic reactions to the medications were not reported in any patient. Intraocular pressures were within normal limits in both groups.

CONCLUSION

LE/T was found to be as effective as DM/T in reducing inflammation after strabismus surgery. LE/T, as a new-generation steroid combination product, could be used as a safe and effective anti-inflammatory agent for the treatment of inflammation following strabismus surgery.

Steroid-induced glaucoma in the pediatric population

Steroid medications may cause elevation of intraocular pressure, sometimes with permanent damage to the optic nerve. These therapies, via various routes of administration, are commonly prescribed for children, but the potential sequelae of elevated intraocular pressure and glaucomatous optic nerve damage can be even more severe and devastating in children than in adults. This review discusses the pathophysiology and potential risk factors, including the impact of intraocular pressure elevation via the different common routes of administration of steroids, clinical evaluation, and management of steroid response and steroid-induced glaucoma in children.

A Prostacyclin Analog, Cicaprost, Exhibits Potent Anti-Inflammatory Activity in Human Primary Immune Cells and a Uveitis Model

PURPOSE

To investigate the therapeutic potential of a prostacyclin (IP) receptor agonist for ocular inflammation and the effect on immune cells.

METHODS

The anti-inflammatory activities of cicaprost were determined in primary human monocyte-derived macrophages and human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MoDC), as well as a lipopolysaccharides (LPS)-induced rat uveitis model. Multiple cytokine release was measured by utilizing Luminex Technology. Prostacyclin (IP) Receptor expression was detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain receptor. Leukocyte infiltration and protein exudation in the rat uveitis model were measured using a hemocytometer and protein concentration by a NanoDrop instrument.

RESULTS

Cicapost, an IP receptor agonist, potently inhibits proinflammatory chemokines/cytokine production not only from LPS- or TNFα (tumor necrosis factor-alpha)-induced primary human monocyte-derived macrophages, but also from LPS-stimulated MoDC. While constitutively expressed in macrophages, the IP receptor was inducible by LPS stimulation in MoDCs. In a LPS-induced rat uveitis model, cicaprost efficaciously prevents ocular inflammatory cell and protein leakage, as well as inflammatory cytokine release.

CONCLUSION

The IP receptor agonist cicaprost is a potent anti-inflammatory agent, implicating that the tightly controlled PGI₂/IP signaling pathway is important in regulating inflammation. This response could be harnessed in ocular inflammatory disease where steroids are currently the standard of care.

Vehicle-Controlled, Phase 2 Clinical Trial of a Sustained-Release Dexamethasone Intracanalicular Insert in a Chronic Allergen Challenge Model

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a sustained-release dexamethasone intracanalicular insert (Dextenza™) in a model of allergic conjunctivitis.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, Phase 2 study. Subjects had to have a positive conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) reaction to allergen (bilateral +2 itching and redness on 5-point, 0-4 scales) at Visit 1, and for 2 of 3 time points on subsequent visits. Subjects who met entry criteria were randomized to receive Dextenza or PV (vehicle insert). Challenges occurred over 42 days, with efficacy assessed at 14 (primary endpoint visit), 28, and 40 days postinsertion. Outcome measures included the evaluation of ocular itching, redness, tearing, chemosis, eyelid swelling, rhinorrhea, and congestion.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight subjects completed the study in the Dextenza group and 31 in the vehicle group. At 14 days postinsertion, Dextenza was statistically superior to PV, with least square mean differences for ocular itching of -0.76, -0.97, and -0.87 at 3, 5, and 7 min post-CAC, and for conjunctival redness of -0.46, -0.66, and -0.68 at 7, 15, and 20 min post-CAC. Clinical significance, defined as a 1-U decrease from PV, was not met for primary efficacy. Secondary endpoints, including number of subjects reporting itching and conjunctival redness, indicated superior performance of Dextenza compared with vehicle. Eleven Dextenza-treated (35.5%) and 10 vehicle-treated (30.3%) subjects each experienced a single adverse event.

CONCLUSION

This Phase 2 study demonstrated preliminary efficacy and safety data of Dextenza for treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.

Comparison of Loteprednol with Fluorometholone after Myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy

Purpose:

To compare the efficacy and side effects of loteprednol versus fluorometholone after myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

Methods:

One hundred and twenty four eyes of 62 patients who underwent PRK were enrolled in this study. One eye of each subject was randomized to receive loteprednol 0.5% and the fellow eye was given fluorometholone 0.1%. Patients were followed up for three months.

Results:

There was no significant difference in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, corneal haze, intraocular pressure (IOP), and ocular discomfort and redness between groups at the final visit. At 3 months postoperatively, 20/25 or better UDVA was achieved in 95% of the loteprednol group and 92% of the fluorometholone group (P > 0.05). There was neither visually significant corneal haze nor ocular hypertension (IOP rise > 10 mmHg or IOP > 21 mmHg) in any group.

Conclusion:

The efficacy and side effects of loteprednol 0.5% and fluorometholone 0.1% after myopic PRK are comparable.

Effects of topical corticosteroid administration on intraocular pressure in normal and glaucomatous cats

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of topical corticosteroid (CCS) therapy on intraocular pressure (IOP) in normal cats and cats with primary feline congenital glaucoma (FCG).

ANIMALS STUDIED

Five normal and 11 FCG cats were studied in two cohorts.

PROCEDURES

IOP was measured by a single, masked observer, once daily, 3-5 days/week throughout the course of CCS treatment and for up to 11 days after treatment discontinuation. One eye per cat was randomly assigned for treatment twice daily with CCS; balanced salt solution (BSS) applied to the contralateral eye served as a control. Differences between eyes and between weeks of the study period were calculated for each cat. A positive response to CCS was defined as a consistent >15% or >25% higher IOP in the treated relative to control eye in normal and FCG cats, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 8 of 11 FCG cats responded to topical CCS after 1-5 weeks of treatment with an increase in IOP relative to the untreated eye (maximum IOP discrepancy of 56 mmHg). Two of five normal cats responded to topical CCS with an appreciable, but clinically unimportant increase in IOP in the treated eye (maximum IOP discrepancy of 6.4 mmHg).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that the incidence of steroid-induced IOP elevation in cats is lower than that of previously published feline studies. Cats with preexisting compromise in aqueous humor outflow may show a greater, clinically relevant response to topical CCS than normal cats.

Impact of the Topical Ophthalmic Corticosteroid Loteprednol Etabonate on Intraocular Pressure

Corticosteroids are a mainstay therapeutic option for the treatment of ocular inflammation. However, safety remains a concern for clinicians, particularly with long-term use. Though highly effective at suppressing inflammatory and allergic responses, topical ophthalmic corticosteroids carry an inherent risk of side effects, including elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), a risk factor for the development of glaucoma. The corticosteroid loteprednol etabonate (LE) contains an ester rather than a ketone at the C-20 position, minimizing the potential for side effects, including IOP elevation. In early pivotal clinical trials of LE ophthalmic suspension for conjunctivitis (allergic, giant papillary), anterior uveitis, and post-operative inflammation, LE had minimal impact on IOP over short-term (<28 days) and long-term (≥28 days) use. Since then, new LE formulations—including a gel, an ointment, and a suspension of LE in combination with tobramycin—have become commercially available. Multiple studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of LE for inflammatory conditions have been reported, including those requiring longer-term treatment such as photorefractive keratectomy, corneal transplantation, and dry eye disease. We review the available published data on the effect of LE on IOP and report on the cumulative incidence of clinically significant IOP elevations (≥10 mm Hg from baseline) with short-term and long-term LE use. In all studies, LE consistently demonstrated a low propensity to elevate IOP, regardless of formulation, dosage regimen, or treatment duration, including in known steroid responders. The cumulative proportion of patients exhibiting clinically significant IOP increases was 0.8% (14/1725 subjects) in studies evaluating short-term LE treatment and 1.5% (21/1386 subjects) in long-term studies. Furthermore, use of LE was associated with significantly lower rates of IOP elevation ≥10 mm Hg as compared to prednisolone acetate or dexamethasone (when used in combination with tobramycin). The cumulative data to date substantiates a favorable IOP-safety profile for LE with both short-term and long-term use.

Topical delivery of aqueous micellar resolvin E1 analog (RX-10045)

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this study were to optimize aqueous micellar solution of isopropyl ester prodrug of resolvin (RX-10045), study in vivo ocular compatibility and tissue distribution following topical administration.

METHODS

An optimized ratio of hydrogenated castor-oil and octoxynol-40 (1.0:0.05 wt%) was prepared to entrap RX-10045 in the hydrophobic core of micelles. RX-10045 aqueous micelles were subjected to characterization. In vitro stability studies were performed at 4 °C, 25 °C and 40 °C. In vivo studies were conducted in New Zealand albino rabbits following topical drop administration.

RESULTS

Aqueous RX-10045 micellar solutions were successfully prepared. Micelles had a mean diameter of ∼12 nm with low negative surface charge. RX-10045 demonstrated high stability in citrate buffer (0.0 1M) at 40 °C. Hackett-McDonald ocular irritation scores were extremely low comparable to negative control. No significant difference in intraocular pressure was noted. Electroretinography studies did not reveal any retinal damage after multiple dosing of RX-10045 micellar solution. Ocular tissue distribution studies demonstrated appreciable drug concentrations in anterior ocular tissues. Moreover, RX-10008 (active metabolite of RX-10045) was detected in retina/choroid upon topical drop instillation.

CONCLUSIONS

A clear, stable, aqueous 0.1% RX-10045 micellar formulation was successfully prepared. Micellar solution was well-tolerated and did not have any measurable tissue damage in rabbit ocular tissues. Micelles appear to follow conjunctival/scleral pathway to reach back-of-the-eye tissue (retina). Topical aqueous formulations may be employed to treat posterior ocular diseases. Such micellar topical formulations may be more patient acceptable over invasive routes of administrations such as intravitreal injection/implants.

A retrospective analysis of the postoperative use of loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy surgery

BACKGROUND

While loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic gel 0.5% (LE gel) is approved for treatment of postoperative ocular inflammation and pain, there have been no reported studies in patients undergoing laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review conducted at five refractive surgical centers in the USA. Data were collected from primary LASIK or PRK surgery cases in which LE gel was used postoperatively as the clinician's routine standard of care and in which patients were followed-up for up to 6 months. Data extracted from charts included patient demographics, surgical details, LE gel dosing regimen, pre- and postsurgical refractive characteristics, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, and visual acuity. Primary outcomes included postoperative IOP elevations, adverse events, and early discontinuations.

RESULTS

Data were collected on 189 LASIK eyes (96 patients) and 209 PRK eyes (108 patients). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) years of age at surgery was 36.0 (11.7) and 33.9 (11.3) in LASIK and PRK patients. LE gel was prescribed most often four times daily during the first postoperative week, regardless of procedure; the most common treatment duration was 7-14 days in LASIK and ≥30 days in PRK patients. No unusual corneal findings or healing abnormalities were reported. Mean postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/24 in LASIK and 20/30 in PRK eyes. Mild/trace corneal haze was reported in 20% of PRK patients; two PRK patients with moderate/severe corneal haze were switched to another corticosteroid. Mean postoperative IOP did not increase over time in either LASIK or PRK eyes (P≥0.331); clinically significant elevations from baseline in IOP (≥10 mmHg) were noted in only three eyes of two PRK patients.

CONCLUSION

LE gel appears to have a high level of safety and tolerability when used for the management of postoperative pain and inflammation following LASIK and PRK surgery.

Intraocular Implants for the Treatment of Autoimmune Uveitis

Uveitis is the third leading cause of blindness in developed countries. Currently, the most widely used treatment of non-infectious uveitis is corticosteroids. Posterior uveitis and macular edema can be treated with intraocular injection of corticosteroids, however, this is problematic in chronic cases because of the need for repeat injections. Another option is systemic immunosuppressive therapies that have their own undesirable side effects. These systemic therapies result in a widespread suppression of the entire immune system, leaving the patient susceptible to infection. Therefore, an effective localized treatment option is preferred. With the recent advances in bioengineering, biodegradable polymers that allow for a slow sustained-release of a medication. These advances have culminated in drug delivery implants that are food and drug administration (FDA) approved for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis. In this review, we discuss the types of ocular implants available and some of the polymers used, implants used for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis, and bioengineered alternatives that are on the horizon.

A randomized controlled trial comparing dexamethasone with loteprednol etabonate on postoperative photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE

To compare loteprednol etabonate 0.5%/tobramycin 0.3% (Zylet(®)) with dexamethasone 0.1%/tobramycin 0.3% (Tobradex(®)) in terms of the epithelial healing time, postoperative visual acuity, corneal haziness score, and intraocular pressure (IOP) in postoperative treatment after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, double-masked (participants and assessors blinded) controlled study included 32 patients who underwent PRK. The patients were allocated equally into 2 groups by block randomization to receive either loteprednol etabonate (Lot) or dexamethasone (Dex) for 1 month after the surgery. The epithelial healing time, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), corneal haziness score, and IOP were evaluated at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months.

RESULTS

The corneal epithelium was healed within 3 days in both groups; however, the epithelium was closed on the second day in 3 cases in the Lot group compared with 1 case in the Dex group. No significant differences were found for UCVA at 1 and 3 months (Fisher exact test, P>0.01). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in corneal haziness scores between the 2 groups at 1 and 3 months (Mann-Whitney U test, P>0.05). The number of patients experiencing significantly increased IOP (≥5 mmHg) from baseline at any visit for the Lot group (1/16 patients) was fewer than for the Dex group (3/16 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Loteprednol etabonate was effective in postoperative PRK management and was significantly less likely to produce elevations in IOP than was dexamethasone.

Treatment of blepharitis: recent clinical trials

Blepharitis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the eyelids that is frequently encountered in clinical practice. The etiology of the disorder is complex and not fully understood, but the general consensus is that bacteria and inflammation contribute to the pathology. Blepharitis can be classified into anterior blepharitis, involving the anterior lid margin and eyelashes, and posterior blepharitis, characterized by dysfunction of the meibomian glands. Long-term management of symptoms may include daily eyelid cleansing routines and the use of therapeutic agents that reduce infection and inflammation. A cure is not possible in most cases, and subjective symptoms may persist even when a clinical assessment of signs indicates that the condition has improved. There are no established guidelines regarding therapeutic regimens, but recent clinical trials have shown that antibiotics and topical corticosteroids can produce significant improvement in signs and symptoms of blepharitis. Fixed combinations of a topical antibiotic and a corticosteroid offer an effective and convenient treatment modality that addresses both infectious and inflammatory components of the disease. Further clinical trials are needed to determine optimal therapies for managing blepharitis.

Prolonged exposure to loteprednol etabonate in human tear fluid and rabbit ocular tissues following topical ocular administration of Lotemax gel, 0.5%

PURPOSE

A new gel formulation containing loteprednol etabonate (LE), a C-20 ester corticosteroid used to treat ocular inflammation, was developed to provide increased retention on the ocular surface for improved drug delivery to intraocular tissues. This investigation evaluated concentrations of LE in tear fluid following topical instillation of LE gel to humans and the ocular and systemic pharmacokinetics of LE following administration to rabbits.

METHODS

LE ophthalmic gel 0.5% was administered as a single topical dose to human volunteers (n=12) and Dutch Belted rabbits (n=40). In the human study, tear sampling was performed at 6, 9, 12, and 24 h after instillation. In the rabbit study, tears and ocular tissues were collected from 5 min through 24 h postdose. Serial blood samples were collected from one cohort of rabbits for plasma analysis. Concentrations of LE were determined by high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

In humans, LE was detected in tears at all the time points assessed with mean concentrations of 114 μg/g at 6 h declining to 2.41 μg/g at 24 h postdose. In rabbits, LE was detected in all ocular tissues within 5 min after dosing. Maximum concentrations of LE were achieved within 0.5 h and were highest in tear fluid (1560 μg/g), followed by bulbar conjunctiva (4.03 μg/g), cornea, (2.18 μg/g), iris/ciliary body (0.162 μg/g), and aqueous humor (0.0138 μg/mL). LE remained measurable in all ocular tissues through 24 h with the exception of aqueous humor. In contrast, plasma levels of LE were low with no detectable levels after 4 h.

CONCLUSIONS

The gel formulation of LE provided prolonged exposure to LE on the ocular surface, with measurable levels in tears through 24 h in both humans and rabbits, for delivery of LE to anterior segment tissues, as evidenced by sustained levels of LE in rabbit conjunctiva, cornea, and iris/ciliary body.

Dose uniformity of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic gel (0.5%) compared with branded and generic prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension (1%)

Introduction

Loteprednol etabonate (LE) ophthalmic gel 0.5% (Lotemax®) is a new polycarbophil-based, nonsettling topical ophthalmic formulation. The formulation is a semisolid gel at rest and a shear thinning fluid when expressed through a dropper tip. The present study was undertaken to determine how the nonsettling character of LE ophthalmic gel affects dose uniformity. Prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension 1% (Pred Forte®) and a generic prednisolone acetate suspension 1% were used as comparators.

Methods

Drug concentrations of LE ophthalmic gel, Pred Forte, and a generic prednisolone acetate suspension were determined following simulated dosing – consisting of 2 drops, expressed four times daily for 2 weeks, with bottles that were shaken or not shaken immediately prior to expressing the drops. Drug concentrations were determined using a reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method and reported as a percentage of the declared (labeled) concentration. Comparative kinetics of drug particle sedimentation were also determined for each formulation, using dispersion analysis under gravity.

Results

Mean drug concentrations in drops of all three formulations were within a few percentage points of the declared concentration when the bottles were shaken for 5 seconds prior to dispensing. Only LE ophthalmic gel showed consistent and on-target concentrations when the bottles were unshaken prior to dispensing, with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) percent declared concentration of 102% (1.92%) over the 2-week dosing regimen. Drug concentrations for the branded and generic prednisolone acetate suspensions following expression from unshaken bottles were highly variable (overall relative SDs of 16.8% and 20.3%, respectively), with mean concentrations for both falling significantly below the declared concentration for drops expressed at the beginning of the 2-week dosing regimen and significantly above the declared concentration for drops expressed near the end of the dosing regimen. Dispersion analysis at 120× g showed no drug particle sedimentation for LE ophthalmic gel over the 24-hour testing period, whereas the prednisolone acetate suspensions settled in less than 6 hours.

Conclusion

LE ophthalmic gel 0.5% provided consistent dose uniformity at the declared concentration whether or not the bottle was shaken prior to dispensing, whereas Pred Forte® and the generic prednisolone acetate required shaking to provide consistent drug concentrations. LE ophthalmic gel may be beneficial to patients because it eliminates the potential impact on the clinical response of both under- and overdosing.