Randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral atenolol in patients with unexplained syncope and positive upright tilt table test results

Randomized clinical trials of neurally mediated syncope

Evidence for therapy of neurally mediated syncope is generally weak. Many drugs have been used for the treatment of vasovagal syncope (beta-blockers, disopyramide, scopolamine, clonidine, theophylline, fludrocortisone, ephedrine, dihydroergotamine, etilefrine, midodrine, clonidine, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, enalapril). In general, although the results have been satisfactory in uncontrolled trials or short-term controlled trials, the majority of long-term placebo-controlled prospective trials have not been able to show a benefit of the active drug over placebo. Only two well-designed double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trials have been performed-one for etilefrine and the other for atenolol-and both were unable to show a superiority of the active drug versus placebo. Four randomized clinical trials of pacing therapy-three positive and one negative-have been performed in patients affected by vasovagal syncope. The relationship between carotid sinus hypersensitivity and spontaneous, otherwise unexplained, syncope has been demonstrated. Cardiac pacing appears to be beneficial in carotid sinus syndrome; its efficacy has been demonstrated by two randomized controlled trials and confirmed by several pre-post comparative studies, one controlled trial, and one prospective observational study. There is evidence and general agreement that cardiac pacing is useful in patients with cardioinhibitory or mixed carotid sinus syndrome. Usefulness of the treatment is less well established and divergence of opinion exists with regard to cardiac pacing in patients with cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope. The evidence fails to support the efficacy of beta-blocking drugs. As yet there are insufficient data to support the use of any other pharmacologic therapy for vasovagal syncope.

Neurocardiogenic syncope in children : current concepts in diagnosis and management

A wide variety of pharmacologic agents are currently used for the prevention of recurrent neurocardiogenic syncope in children and adolescents. Significant advances in the understanding of this syncopal disorder have occurred in the past decade, and the list of medications recommended has changed, reflecting the evolving understanding of the pathophysiology and development of agents with enhanced efficacy and fewer adverse effects. Clinicians have few randomized controlled trials available to guide their decisions about treating neurocardiogenic syncope, and even fewer when it comes to medications targeting the pediatric population. At the present time, beta-adrenergic receptor blockers, fludrocortisone, and also specific serotonin reuptake inhibitors and midodrine, appear to be favored treatment options. Ideally, specific therapy would be tailored to specific pathophysiologic mechanisms. Unfortunately, at present, specific treatments based on those abnormalities have not been identified.

Syncope and orthostatic intolerance

Syncope and orthostatic intolerance remain common and significant clinical problems with many undocumented, misdiagnosed, or cryptogenic cases. Careful clinical assessment and application of advancing laboratory support can further improve diagnosis and treatment. Despite the depth of existing research into these common problems, many underlying mechanisms remain unproven.

Outcome of patients with dual-chamber pacemakers implanted for the prevention of neurally mediated syncope

Dual-chamber pacemaker insertion (PI) has been found to reduce the recurrence of neurally mediated syncope (NMS) in 3 randomized trials. However, the long-term benefits of PI are unknown. To assess the natural history of NMS, we followed a cohort of 40 patients who underwent PI for frequent NMS for 46 to 75 months. We assessed the reduction in syncope frequency after PI and the time to first recurrence of syncope. Sixty months after PI, 32.5% of patients remained free of NMS. The frequency of syncope decreased from 0.46 to 0.06 spells/month (before to after PI, p = 0.04). Two groups of patients were identified, with responders to PI defined as having a 75% decrease in the frequency of NMS. Responders (n = 22) experienced a significant decrease in the frequency of NMS (0.31 to 0.01 spells/month, p <0.0001), whereas nonresponders did not experience a similar reduction (p = 0.8). Responders could not be identified by either baseline or tilt-test parameters. Patients without an early recurrence of syncope after PI (within 6 months) experienced a significant reduction in the frequency of NMS (0.24 to 0.02 spells/month, p = 0.0002), although the reduction was not significant (p = 0.3) in patients with an early recurrence of syncope. Some, but not all, patients respond to permanent PI for NMS. The long-term benefit of permanent PI can be predicted by timing of the first recurrence of syncope, but not by preimplantation factors.

Syncope: investigation and treatment

Syncope is a common condition that can be both disabling and expensive to treat. Although investigative modalities are sometimes required, a diagnosis can often be made with a good history and physical exam. Recent reports have identified specific historic features that are more suggestive of cardiac syncope as compared with vasovagal syncope and seizures. Advances in ambulatory electrocardiography (in particular the implantable loop recorder) have proven invaluable in both difficult-to-diagnose syncope, and in advancing our knowledge of its mechanisms. When clear dysrhythmias are manifest, appropriate therapies are self-evident. However, recurrent vasovagal syncope continues to be a condition that can be difficult to treat. Fortunately, there are well-conducted trials of both pharmacologic therapies (b-blockers, alpha agonists, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) and nonpharmacologic treatments (orthostatic physical training and dual-chamber pacemakers) that should provide more guidance in the near future.

Vasovagal syncope: a prospective, randomized, crossover evaluation of the effect of propranolol, nadolol and placebo on syncope recurrence and patients' well-being

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the relative therapeutic efficacy of propranolol, nadolol and placebo in recurrent vasovagal syncope (VVS).

BACKGROUND

Central and peripheral mechanisms have been implicated in the pathogenesis of VVS. Propranolol, nadolol and placebo have different sites of action on central and/or peripheral mechanisms. It has not yet been clarified whether one of the aforementioned treatments is more efficient than the others in reducing clinical episodes and exerting a beneficial effect on patients' well-being.

METHODS

We studied 30 consecutive patients with recurrent VVS and a positive head-up tilt test. All were serially and randomly assigned to propranolol, nadolol or placebo. Therapy with each drug lasted three months. On the day of drug crossover, patients reported the total number of syncopal and presyncopal attacks during the previous period. They also gave a general assessment of their quality of life, taking into account: 1) symptom recurrence; 2) drug side effects; and 3) their personal well-being during therapy (scale 0 to 4: 0 = very bad/discontinuation; 1 = bad; 2 = good; 3 = very good; 4 = excellent). At the end of the nine-month follow-up period, they reported whether they preferred a specific treatment over the others.

RESULTS

Spontaneous syncopal and presyncopal episode recurrence during each three-month follow-up period was reduced by all drugs tested (analysis of variance [ANOVA]: chi-square = 67.4, p < 0.0001 for syncopal attacks; chi-square = 60.1, p < 0.0001 for presyncopal attacks) No differences were observed in the recurrence of syncope and presyncope among the three drugs. All drugs improved the patients' well-being (ANOVA: chi-square = 61.9, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Propranolol, nadolol and placebo are equally effective treatments in VVS, as demonstrated by a reduction in the recurrence of syncope and presyncope, as well as an improvement in the patients' well-being.

Strategy for the management of vasovagal syncope

The disorders of autonomic control associated with orthostatic intolerance are a diverse group of syndromes that can result in syncope and near-syncope. A basic understanding of the pathophysiology of these disorders is essential to diagnosis and proper treatment. It is especially important to recognise the difference between the effect of prolonged upright posture on a failing autonomic nervous system (a hyposensitive or dysautonomic response) and the vasovagal response (which may be a hypersensitive response). Vasovagal syncope is the most common abnormal response to upright posture and occurs in all age groups. The advent of tilt table testing has helped define a population with an objective finding during provocative testing that has enabled researchers to study the mechanism of vasovagal syncope and to evaluate the efficacy of treatments. In most patients, vasovagal syncope occurs infrequently and only under exceptional circumstances and treatment is not needed. Treatment may be indicated in patients with recurrent syncope or with syncope that has been associated with physical injury or potential occupational hazard. Based on study data, patients with vasovagal syncope can now be risk stratified into a high-risk group likely to have recurrent syncope and a low-risk group. Many patients with vasovagal syncope can be effectively treated with education, reassurance and a simple increase in dietary salt and fluid intake. In others, treatment involves removal or avoidance of agents that predispose to hypotension or dehydration. However, when these measures fail to prevent the recurrence of symptoms, pharmacological therapy is usually recommended. Although many pharmacological agents have been proposed and/or demonstrated to be effective based on nonrandomised clinical trials, there is a remarkable absence of data from large prospective clinical trials. Data from randomised placebo-controlled studies support the efficacy of beta-blockers, midodrine, serotonin reuptake inhibitors and ACE inhibitors. There is also considerable clinical experience and a consensus suggesting that fludrocortisone is effective. Encouraging new data suggest that a programme involving tilt training can effectively prevent vasovagal syncope. For patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope that is refractory to these treatments, implantation of a permanent pacemaker with specialised sensing/pacing algorithms appears to be effective. A number of larger clinical trials are underway which should help further define the efficacy of a number of different treatments for vasovagal syncope.

Diagnosis and treatment of neurally mediated syncope

BACKGROUND

Syncope is caused by a severe but reversible reduction in blood flow to the brain stem neurons responsible for supporting consciousness (reticular activating system). Neurally mediated syncope, also referred to as vasovagal or reflex syncope, is the most frequent cause of loss of consciousness in apparently normal subjects.

REVIEW SUMMARY

Neurally mediated syncope is believed to be a reflex response with afferent, central, and efferent pathways. Characteristic autonomic changes in neurally mediated syncope are an increase in parasympathetic efferent activity causing bradycardia and a reduction in sympathetic vasoconstrictor outflow causing vasodilatation. Premonitory symptoms, such as nausea, diaphoresis, abdominal discomfort, and blurred vision, are caused by autonomic activation and are distinguishing features of neurally mediated syncope. Neurally mediated syncope frequently has a characteristic trigger, although this may not be apparent. Testing orthostatic tolerance during passive head-up tilt is the best available diagnostic procedure to evaluate patients with syncope in whom a cardiac cause has been excluded. In many cases, once the diagnosis of neurally mediated syncope is confirmed, it may suffice to reassure the patient and teach him to avoid known triggers and to recognize and act upon early warning symptoms. Because subjects with neurally mediated syncope may potentially be sodium depleted, increasing salt intake can be beneficial in improving their orthostatic intolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurally mediated syncope is the most common form of syncope in healthy adults. The best diagnostic tools are the clinical history and passive head-up tilt. The best treatment strategies are the avoidance of triggering factors as well as intravascular volume expansion.

Neurocardiogenic syncope: aetiology and management

Neurocardiogenic syncope is the most common cause of syncope presenting in the outpatient setting. It is usually encountered among individuals without an underlying heart disease, but not uncommonly participates in the syncope mechanism of patients with an obstructive or an arrhythmic cardiac cause for syncope as well. The vasovagal event is caused by a transient profound hypotensive reaction most commonly associated with inappropriate bradycardia resulting from activation of a complex autonomic reflex. The pathophysiology of neurocardiogenic syncope has been elucidated by tilt table testing, a noninvasive and well-tolerated method for reproducing the event in susceptible individuals. Although the majority of people with vasovagal fainting need no specific treatment, treatment is required for those presenting with problematic features such as frequent events accompanied by trauma or accidents, and occasionally by a severe cardioinhibitory pattern response. A number of different drugs have been proposed to favourably act on different aspects of the neurocardiogenic reflex but only a few randomised, placebo-controlled, drug-specific trials are currently available. Alternatively, cardiac pacing has also been introduced for patients who have symptoms that are drug-refractory or for those with a severe cardioinhibitory hypotensive response. The selection of the appropriate treatment plan should be individualised after consideration of patient history, clinical characteristics and preference, results of the baseline tilting study, and the existing evidence from the few randomised, controlled studies performed so far.

How and when to pace in vasovagal syncope

This article discusses the indications for pacing in vasovagal syncope. It also reviews the literature on pacing results; notably, there are two small randomized controlled trials of pacing versus no therapy (or continued nondevice therapy) that show a clear benefit for pacing. The mode of benefit is, as yet, unclear. Pacing has to be dual chamber with some form of rate hysteresis. Ways of improving pacemaker therapy delivery in vasovagal syncope are anticipated.

Syncope

Successful treatment of patients with syncope depends on the accuracy of the diagnosis, because syncope is a symptom, not a disease; diagnosis of the cause for syncope therefore creates a blueprint for treatment. Most experienced practitioners can diagnose the cause of syncope for less than half of their patients. Excessive and repeat testing is expensive and may not improve the chance of a correct diagnosis. Patient history is the key to the diagnosis. Treatment may vary from a lifestyle change to open heart surgery. The great challenge of treating patients with syncope is to provide cost-effective, safe therapy to those with a benign course and still provide needed treatment for those whose syncope is life threatening.

Evaluation and treatment of pediatric patients with neurocardiogenic syncope

Neurocardiogenic syncope is the most common form of syncope in children. The most widely accepted mechanism of its etiology is a vigorous contraction of the heart due to relative hypovolemia leading to stimulation of C-fibers and sympathetic withdrawal. Episodes usually occur with an upright position and are preceded by a typical prodrome. A classic history is paramount to the diagnosis. Tilt testing aids in the diagnosis in certain cases. The cornerstone of therapy is maintaining adequate hydration and avoiding situations that may lead to harm with syncopal events. Beta blockers, fludrocortisone, alpha adrenergic agents and disopyramide are commonly used to prevent syncope. Seratonin reuptake inhibitors, pacing with rate drop algorithms and tilt training are relatively new in the armamentarium of therapy.

Permanent cardiac pacing versus medical treatment for the prevention of recurrent vasovagal syncope: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This clinical investigation was performed to compare the effects of permanent dual-chamber cardiac pacing with pharmacological therapy in patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients from 14 centers were randomized to receive either a DDD pacemaker provided with rate-drop response function or the beta-blocker atenolol at the dosage of 100 mg once a day. Inclusion criteria were age >35 years, >/=3 syncopal spells in the preceding 2 years, and positive response to tilt table testing with syncope occurring in association with relative bradycardia. The primary outcome was the first recurrence of syncope after randomization. Enrollment was started in December 1997, and the first formal interim analysis was performed on July 30, 2000. By that time, 93 patients (38 men and 55 women; mean age, 58.1+/-14.3 years) had been enrolled and randomized, although follow-up data were available for all patients (46 patients in the pacemaker arm, 47 patients in the pharmacological arm). The interim analysis showed a significant effect in favor of permanent cardiac pacing (recurrence of syncope in 2 patients [4.3%] after a median of 390 days) compared with medical treatment (recurrence of syncope in 12 patients [25.5%] after a median of 135 days; OR, 0.133; 95% CI, 0.028 to 0.632; P=0.004). Consequently, enrollment and follow-up were terminated.

CONCLUSIONS

DDD pacing with rate-drop response function is more effective than beta-blockade for the prevention of syncopal recurrences in highly symptomatic vasovagal fainters with relative bradycardia during tilt-induced syncope.

Emerging indications for cardiac pacing

Substantial data have been accumulated and indications have been well delineated for pacemaker implantation in the treatment of sinus node dysfunction and heart block. However, many other indications have been proposed for pacemaker implantation. In this review, the authors examine available data regarding pacemaker implantation for new indications: neurally mediated syncope, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, prevention of atrial fibrillation, and the relative merits of single-chamber and dual-chamber pacemakers.

Medical therapy of neurocardiogenic syncope

Neurocardiogenic syncope, alternatively called vasovagal, vasodepressor, or neurally mediated syncope, is a clinical syndrome faced by many clinicians. Its pathophysiology is complicated and not fully understood. Multiple pharmacologic therapies have been evaluated, with no clear ideal agent. Decisions regarding tilt-table testing, selection of pharmacotherapy, and assessment of drug efficacy are not straightforward. This article attempts to assess these issues.

Diagnostic evaluation and management of patients with syncope

This article focuses on the evaluation of patients with syncope, a symptom not a disease. Syncope is a transient loss of consciousness associated with loss of postural tone with spontaneous recovery. The authors discuss the utility of an indications for different diagnostic tests, the indications for hospital admission, and the management of patients with certain known causes of syncope, including vasovagal and arrhythmic.

Lack of efficacy of atenolol for the prevention of neurally mediated syncope in a highly symptomatic population: a prospective, double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of atenolol for the long-term management of patients with vasovagal syncope. The primary hypothesis was that atenolol is not superior to placebo for the treatment of vasovagal syncope.

BACKGROUND

There is no definitive well-controlled analysis of the efficacy of beta-adrenergic blocking agents in patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope.

METHODS

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Fifty patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope were included (at least two episodes in the last year). A baseline tilt test was performed. Twenty patients (40%) had a positive tilt test. Intravenous atenolol prevented a second positive tilt in five patients. The patients were randomized to receive either atenolol or a placebo (26 patients atenolol 50 mg/day, 24 patients placebo). The follow-up procedure lasted one year. The primary end point of the study was the time to first recurrence of syncope.

RESULTS

In the intention-to-treat analysis, the group treated with atenolol had a similar number of patients with recurrent syncopal episodes as the placebo group. The Kaplan-Meier actuarial estimates of time to first syncopal recurrence showed that the probability of remaining free of syncope drops similarly in both groups and that there was no statistical difference between both curves (patients treated with atenolol vs. the placebo) with a log-rank test p value of 0.4517.

CONCLUSIONS

The recurrence of neurocardiogenic syncope in highly symptomatic patients treated with atenolol is similar to that of patients treated with placebo.

Syncope

Syncope is a common clinical presentation. Although most commonly benign, it may herald a pathology with a poor prognosis. The work-up of syncope includes a careful history, physical examination, electrocardiogram, risk stratification, and appropriately directed testing. The key factor in the investigation of syncope is the presence (or absence) of structural heart disease or an abnormal electrocardiogram. The most useful investigation in unexplained syncope with a normal heart is the tilt table test for evaluating predisposition to neurocardiogenic (vasovagal) syncope. In the setting of structural heart disease or an abnormal electrocardiogram, electrophysiologic studies play a more important role. The utility of noninvasive cardiac monitoring for symptom-rhythm correlation may be limited by infrequent symptoms. The availability of external and implantable loop recorders allows prolonged periods of monitoring to increase diagnostic yield. The management of patients with syncope may be complex. Early referral to a cardiac electrophysiologist is warranted in patients who are at high risk.

Vasodepressor Syncope

Neurocardiogenic syncope is a common disorder affecting various individuals of different ages with a wide variety of circumstances and comorbid conditions. Although a large amount of data is available regarding evaluation and treatment options, there is still sufficient latitude for the physician to exercise clinical judgment. We summarize current opinions on treatment here and also add some of our own bias regarding how to manage such patients. The vast majority of patients can be assessed by a reduction of symptomatic episodes with therapy. In all patients, careful follow-up should be made after initiating therapy. Not all patients will obtain complete resolution of symptoms. If episodes of complete syncope are reduced to infrequent dizzy spells, however, this may be satisfactory. In other patients, abrupt syncope may be converted to spells with a sufficient prodromal warning for the patient to take evasive action.

Pacing to prevent vasovagal syncope

Patients with frequent vasovagal syncope have markedly poor quality of life and are often resistant to treatment with standard pharmacologic approaches. Vasovagal syncope is due to combinations of bradycardia and hypotension. There is accumulating evidence that many of these patients may respond to permanent cardiac pacing. Several controlled open-label studies suggest that about half of paced patients no longer faint, and most of the rest are improved. At this point, we do not know the role of placebo, and specific pacing modes in this improvement are not known. Ongoing trials will clarify how to select patients and how best to pace them.

Pharmacologic approaches to therapy for vasovagal syncope

Vasovagal syncope is a common disorder of autonomic cardiovascular regulation. Many pharmacologic agents have been proposed as effective in the management of this condition based on nonrandomized clinical trials. Notably, only 3 agents--atenolol, midodrine, and paroxetine--have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of vasovagal syncope in at least 1 prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Other therapies commonly used in treating syncope include increased salt and fluid intake and fludrocortisone. In this review, we provide a summary of currently available data that support or question the use of various pharmacologic agents for treatment of vasovagal syncope.

Putting it together: a new treatment algorithm for vasovagal syncope and related disorders

The consensus process that culminated in this symposium established an algorithm to guide the diagnosis and treatment of patients with vasovagal syncope and related disorders. In some patients, the hemodynamic response to standing may identify an abnormality-postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome or orthostatic hypotension-that can often be treated without further testing. When the response to standing is normal, tilt-table testing may be useful in making the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope and guiding treatment. In some patients, however, the diagnosis is clear from the history, and tilt-table testing may not be necessary. Not all patients with vasovagal syncope need to be treated, and many can be treated effectively with education, reassurance, and a simple increase in dietary salt. In evaluating the results of tilt-table testing, an important consideration is the distinction between vasovagal syncope and the dysautonomic response to tilt characterized by a gradual and progressive decrease in blood pressure that leads to syncope. Current practice patterns suggest that beta blockers, fludrocortisone, and midodrine, are commonly used to treat patients with vasovagal syncope, and patients with the dysautonomic response are generally treated with fludrocortisone and midodrine. Permanent pacing with specialized pacing algorithms should be considered for patients with frequent vasovagal syncope that is refractory to medical therapy. The guidelines proposed here are an amalgam of clinical experience, expert opinion, and research evidence; however, they do not suggest a standard of care for all patients.

Role of pacing in the treatment of vasovagal syncope

Patients with frequent vasovagal syncope have a markedly poor quality of life and are often resistant to treatment by standard pharmacologic approaches. Although the evidence is not conclusive, clinical vasovagal syncope is probably associated with some degree of bradycardia. Studies of temporary pacing during tilt-table testing have shown that pacing prevents syncope in more than half of patients who develop a vasovagal response. Three open-label studies of permanent pacing showed that pacing was associated with substantial improvement, and the prospective randomized Vasovagal Pacemaker Study reported an 85% relative risk reduction in patients randomized to pacemaker therapy compared with medical therapy. The roles of specific pacemaker modes in vasovagal syncope have not been determined, although early evidence indicates that rate-drop responsiveness is useful. The second Vasovagal Pacemaker Study may clarify the role of rate-drop responsiveness.

Orthostatic intolerance and chronic fatigue syndrome associated with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To report chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) associated with both Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) and orthostatic intolerance.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series of adolescents referred to a tertiary clinic for the evaluation of CFS. All subjects had 2-dimensional echocardiography, tests of orthostatic tolerance, and examinations by both a geneticist and an ophthalmologist.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (11 female), median age 15.5 years, met diagnostic criteria for CFS and EDS, and all had either postural tachycardia or neurally mediated hypotension in response to orthostatic stress. Six had classical-type EDS and 6 had hypermobile-type EDS.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with CFS and orthostatic intolerance, a subset also has EDS. We propose that the occurrence of these syndromes together can be attributed to the abnormal connective tissue in dependent blood vessels of those with EDS, which permits veins to distend excessively in response to ordinary hydrostatic pressures. This in turn leads to increased venous pooling and its hemodynamic and symptomatic consequences. These observations suggest that a careful search for hypermobility and connective tissue abnormalities should be part of the evaluation of patients with CFS and orthostatic intolerance syndromes.

Pharmacotherapy of neurally mediated syncope

A wide variety of pharmacological agents are currently used for prevention of recurrent neurally mediated syncope, especially the vasovagal faint. None, however, have unequivocally proven long-term effectiveness based on adequate randomized clinical trials. At the present time, beta-adrenergic receptor blockade, along with agents that increase central volume (eg, fludrocortisone, electrolyte-containing beverages), appear to be favored treatment options. The antiarrhythmic agent disopyramide and various serotonin reuptake blockers have also been reported to be beneficial. Finally, vasoconstrictor agents such as midodrine offer promise and remain the subject of clinical study. Ultimately, though, detailed study of the pathophysiology of these syncopal disorders and more aggressive pursuit of carefully designed placebo-controlled treatment studies are essential if pharmacological prevention of recurrent neurally mediated syncope is to be placed on a firm foundation.

Neurally Mediated Syncope

Syncope is a common problem in medical practice. Of the various types of syncope, the neurally mediated syncopal syndromes (of which vasovagal syncope is the most common) predominate. In most cases, neurally mediated syncope is a solitary event that can be managed with only reassurance, but certain patients (those with multiple recurrences or those who have been injured as a result of syncope) need further investigation and therapy. Dietary and lifestyle changes are crucial and often overlooked aspects of therapy that may be sufficient to control symptoms. Pharmacologic therapy, which usually starts with beta-blockers or fludrocortisone, can also be effective. Finally, certain patients may continue to have recurrences despite the use of both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapy. It was recently demonstrated that permanent pacing may be effective in preventing recurrent syncopal episodes in some of these patients.

Neurohormonal profile before and after beta-blockade in patients with neurocardiogenic syncope

Our objective was to evaluate the effects of beta-blockers on the neurohormonal profile, particularly vasopressin (VP) release, in vasovagal syncope and to gain further insight on the pathophysiology of this syndrome. Patients (< or =75 years) with no cardiovascular, neurological disorders, or contraindications to the use of isoproterenol or beta-blockers and being explored for unexplained syncope were included. An 80 degrees HUT was performed under identical conditions. After a 25-min period of passive tilt, isoproterenol was infused at a rate of 1-5 microg/mn if required. Two groups matched for age and sex were considered: a HUT-positive and a HUT-negative group. The HUT-positive group was then given beta-blockers, subsequently reassessed, and divided into two subgroups: alpha beta-blocker nonresponder group and a beta-blocker responder group. Blood samples for assays of norepinephrine (NE), epinephrine (E), and VP were taken at baseline and the end of the procedure. In all, 44 subjects entered the study, 22 in each group. The HUT-positive group exhibited an obvious lesser increase in plasma NE and a clear-cut rise in plasma E and VP compared to the HUT-negative group (P < 0.05). Even though no patient in the HUT-positive group reported recurrent symptoms under treatment, the second HUT could distinguish two subgroups: a beta-blocker nonresponder group (n = 12) whose HUT remained positive and a beta-blocker responder group (n = 10) whose HUT was normalized. The time course of plasma E and VP during the second HUT was similar to that for the HUT-positive and HUT-negative groups. In conclusion, the efficacy of beta-blockers is associated not only with a reduction of the sympathoadrenal stimulation seen in vasovagal syncope but also with a lower release of VP suggesting that low-pressure baroreceptors might be involved in VP release.

Management of vasovagal syncope

Vasovagal syncope is a common disorder of autonomic cardiovascular regulation that can be very disabling and result in a significant level of psychosocial and physical limitations. The optimal approach to treatment of patients with vasovagal syncope remains uncertain. Although many different types of treatment have been proposed and appear effective based largely on small nonrandomized studies and clinical series, there is a remarkable absence of data from large prospective clinical trials. However, based on currently available data, the pharmacologic agents most likely to be effective in the treatment of patients with vasovagal syncope include beta blockers, fludrocortisone, and alpha-adrenergic agonists. In this article, we provide a summary of the various therapeutic options that have been proposed for vasovagal syncope and review the clinical studies that form the basis of present therapy for this relatively common entity.

"Rate-drop response" cardiac pacing for vasovagal syncope. Rate-Drop Response Investigators Group

Recent reports suggest that cardiac pacing incorporating a rate-drop response algorithm is associated with a reduction in the frequency of syncopal episodes in patients with apparent cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope. The detection portion of the algorithm employs a programmable heart rate change-time duration "window" to both identify abrupt cardiac slowing suggestive of an imminent vasovagal event and trigger "high rate" pacing. The purpose of this study was to develop recommendations for programming the rate-drop response algorithm. Pacemaker programming, symptom status, and drug therapy were assessed retrospectively in 24 patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope of sufficient severity to warrant consideration of pacemaker treatment. In the 53 +/- 19 months prior to pacing, patients had experienced an approximate syncope burden of 1.2 events/month. During follow-up of 192 +/- 160 days, syncope recurred in 4 patients (approximate syncope burden, 0.3 events/month, p < 0.05 vs. pre-pacing), and pre-syncope in 5 patients. In these patients, rate-drop response parameters were initially set based on electrocardiographic and/or tilt-table recordings, and were re-programmed at least once in 14 (58%) individuals. A 20 beat/min window height (top rate minus bottom rate), a window width of 10 beats (61% of patients), and 2 or 3 confirmation beats (79% of patients) appeared to be appropriate in most patients. Treatment intervention rate was set to > 100 beats/min in 89% of patients, with a duration of 1 to 2 min in 79%. In conclusion, a narrow range of rate-drop response parameter settings appeared to be effective for most individuals in this group of highly symptomatic patients.

Usefulness of intravenous metoprolol to prevent syncope induced by head-up tilt

Intravenous metoprolol was found to be significantly more effective than placebo in preventing head-up tilt-table induced neurally mediated syncope. The reproducibility of acute tilt-table testing is only 63% and suggests caution in the interpretation of acute drug testing during tilt-table studies.

Head-upright tilt table testing. A safe and easy way to assess neurocardiogenic syncope

Head-upright tilt table testing has emerged as an exciting technique for evaluating episodes of autonomically mediated syncope. It may be performed using gravity alone as the provocative stimulus or with the addition of isoproterenol. The classic neurocardiogenic response to the test is a sudden drop in blood pressure followed by a decrease in heart rate, but other abnormal response patterns have also been reported. Continuing investigations will improve understanding of autonomic disturbances that cause orthostatic intolerance and will help elaborate the role of tilt table testing in their evaluation and management.

Unexplained syncope: clinical management

The management of unexplained syncope begins with the patient's history and physical examination, which are oriented to help separate benign from serious causes. Malignant etiologies are more likely to occur with exertional syncope. Cardiac causes should be considered, particularly cardiomyopathy, postoperative congenital heart disease, right ventricular dysplasia, anomalous coronary artery, pulmonary artery hypertension, myocarditis, long QT syndrome, and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Neurological and metabolic disorders may underlie a syncope episode. After malignant causes of syncope have been excluded and the diagnosis of neurocardiac syncope has been established, treatment strategies include behavior modification, salt and increased fluids, and pharmacological agents. Efficacious agents include beta-blockers, dysopyramide, fludrocortisones, and alpha agents. Yet, behavior modification alone may be as effective as salt or pharmacological therapy. Because the natural history of neurocardiac syncope in children is spontaneous resolution, it is appropriate to try the simple measures before introducing drug therapy.

[Long-term prognosis of patients with syncope of unknown origin in prolonged asystole induced by the head-up tilt test]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Prognosis and therapeutic assessment of patients with syncope and prolonged asystole during head-up tilt test remain unclear. The aim of the present study was to analyze the clinical evolution of patients with syncope of unknown origin, no heart disease and severe cardioinhibitory response induced by head-up tilt.

METHODS

A prospective follow-up study was performed in 12 patients (6 male and 6 female, mean age 31 +/- 20 years) with recurrent syncope, no heart disease and affected by severe cardioinhibitory syncope induced by head-up tilt test. This was defined as syncope or near-syncope induced by baseline or isoproterenol tilt with asystole of > or = 3 seconds. All patients were re-tilted twice: with salt and fluid and with metoprolol (25 mg/b.i.d). According to the results of these tests, 5 patients were discharged with dietetic measures (salt & fluid) and 5 with metoprolol. In 2 patients who showed recurrent prolonged asystole a DDD pacemaker was implanted.

RESULTS

After follow-up of 34 +/- 20 months all patients ae alive. The number of recurrences was small (2 syncopes and 2 near-syncopes). No relationship was observed between the number of syncopal recurrences and the applied treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that prolonged asystole induced by head-up tilt test does not confer an adverse prognosis in patients with syncope of unknown origin and no heart disease, thus, the clinical evolution of these patients is benign.

Syncope. A neurologist's viewpoint

Syncope is caused by a global reversible reduction of blood flow to the brain. Three hemodynamic abnormalities can cause syncope: (1) a fall in systemic blood pressure because of ineffective control of peripheral vascular resistance, (2) an acute decrease in cardiac output, and (3) an acute increase in cerebrovascular resistance. Complicating the differential diagnosis of syncope are other causes of loss of consciousness, such as seizures, metabolic disorders, and psychiatric disorders, which may simulate syncope.

Response of neurocardiac syncope to beta-blocker therapy: interaction between age and parasympathetic tone

Beta-blockers are a first line therapy for neurocardiac syncope, but are not always effective. The purpose of this study was to determine whether differential autonomic responses to orthostasis predict the response of patients with neurocardiac syncope to beta-adrenergic blockade. We computed the RMS successive difference of the RR intervals (RMSSD: a measure of cardiac parasympathetic tone) during supine and upright phases of the initial tilt test in 28 patients with syncope and positive tilt tests who were treated with atenolol. Follow-up tilt testing was performed to assess the efficacy of the drug in preventing tilt induced neurocardiac syncope. RMSSD did not differ at baseline (supine) between those who did (n = 20) and did not (n = 8) respond to beta-blockade. However, withdrawal of parasympathetic tone in response to tilt varied inversely with age (r = -0.69; P < 0.01). Reduced age adjusted parasympathetic withdrawal during orthostasis was associated with a 47% versus 8% risk of beta-blockade failure (odds ratio = 11; P = 0.01). Patients with diminished age adjusted parasympathetic withdrawal during orthostatic stress are less likely to respond to beta-blocker therapy of neurocardiac syncope than their counterparts. This may reflect a correspondingly greater sympathetic response to orthostasis in these patients, but the mechanism for this interaction is undetermined.

Malignant vasovagal syncope: a randomised trial of metoprolol and clonidine

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of head up tilt guided treatment with metoprolol and clonidine in preventing the recurrence of syncope in patients with malignant vasovagal syncope.

PATIENTS

20 patients (9 men and 11 women, mean age 33 (SD 17), range 14 to 62 years) with severe symptoms.

DESIGN

Randomised double blind crossover trial; efficacy was assessed by head up tilt testing.

RESULTS

Metoprolol was more effective than clonidine in abolishing syncope (19/20 v 1/20, P < 0.001) but clonidine showed some beneficial effects on time to syncope and severity of hypotension in 12 patients. During an average follow up of 15 (3) months there was a significant reduction in the recurrence of symptoms compared with the previous year in patients who had tilt up guided treatment (18 metoprolol, 1 clonidine).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment guided by head up tilting is a reliable method of treating patients with malignant vasovagal syndrome. Metoprolol was an effective long term treatment for preventing syncope. High doses were more effective and a careful dose titration period helped to minimise withdrawal symptoms and side effects.

Clinical experience with Thera DR rate-drop response pacing algorithm in carotid sinus syndrome and vasovagal syncope. The International Rate-Drop Investigators Group

This study examined the effectiveness of cardiac pacing using the Thera DR rate-drop response algorithm for prevention of recurrent symptoms in patients with carotid sinus syndrome (CSS) or vasovagal syncope. The algorithm comprises both diagnostic and treatment elements. The diagnostic element consists of a programmable "window" used to identify heart rate changes compatible with an evolving neurally mediated syncopal episode. The treatment arm consists of pacing at a selectable rate and for a programmable duration. Forty-three patients (mean age 53 +/- 20.4 years) with CSS alone (n = 8), CSS in conjunction with vasovagal syncope (n = 4), or vasovagal syncope alone (n = 31) were included. Thirty-nine had recurrent syncope, while the remaining four reported multiple presyncopal events. Prior to pacing, 40 +/- 152 syncopal episodes (range from 1 to approximately 1,000 syncopal events) over the preceding 56 +/- 84.5 months. Postpacing follow-up duration was 204 +/- 172 days. Three patients have been lost to follow-up and in one patient the algorithm was disabled. Among the remaining 39 individuals, 31 (80%) indicated absence or diminished frequency of symptoms, or less severe symptoms. Twenty-three patients (23/29, or 59%) were asymptomatic with respect to syncope or presyncope. Sixteen patients had symptom recurrences. Of these, seven experienced syncope (7/39, or 18%) and 9 (29%) had presyncope: the majority of patients with recurrences (6/7 syncope and 7/9 presyncope) were individuals with a history of vasovagal syncope. Consequently, although symptoms were observed during postpacing follow-up, they appeared to be of reduced frequency and severity. Thus, our findings suggest that a transient period of high rate pacing triggered by the Thera DR rate-drop response algorithm was beneficial in a large proportion of highly symptomatic patients with CSS or vasovagal syncope.

Effect of beta blockers on the time to first syncope recurrence in patients after a positive isoproterenol tilt table test

Isoproterenol-headup tilt table testing provides a diagnosis of neuromediated syncope in many patients who faint. The involvement of beta-adrenoceptor stimulation in the provocation of syncope suggests that beta blockers might chronically prevent syncope. To assess this, a cohort of 153 syncope patients (age 39 +/- 20 years) underwent baseline assessment of demographic variables, symptomatic burden, and hemodynamic and clinical responses to tilt testing. Fifty-two patients then received beta blockers, and 101 did not receive drug therapy. The primary outcome was the time to the first recurrent syncopal spell. Actuarial survival analysis was used. Syncope recurred in 17 of 52 patients who received beta blockers and in 28 of 101 patients who were untreated. The actuarial probability of remaining free of syncope was similar in both groups. For example, the probability of remaining free of syncope 12 months following the tilt test was 0.72 in both populations. Thus, treatment with beta blockers may not have a significant effect in preventing syncope recurrence following a positive tilt test.