Androgen and glucocorticoid regulation of androgen receptor cDNA expression

Differential posttranscriptional regulation of androgen receptor gene expression by androgen in prostate and breast cancer cells

Androgens, via the androgen receptor (AR), modulate the growth and proliferation of prostate and breast cancer cells. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of AR gene expression by androgen in these cells remain to be fully elucidated. To explore differences in AR gene expression between these hormone-responsive tumor cell types, we studied androgen-responsive LNCaP prostate cancer and AR positive MDA453 breast cancer cells. Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) 10 nM increased LNCaP cell proliferation and the proportion of LNCaP cells in S-phase of the cell cycle but inhibited MDA453 cell proliferation and reduced the proportion of MDA453 cells in S-phase of cell cycle. In both these cell lines, DHT decreased total AR messenger RNA (mRNA) but increased AR protein. In LNCaP cells, DHT down-regulated AR mRNA transcription but stabilized AR mRNA. In contrast, in MDA453 cells, DHT had no effect on AR mRNA transcription but destabilized AR mRNA. In summary, transcriptional down-regulation induced by androgens in LNCaP cells results in down-regulation of steady-state AR mRNA despite an androgen-induced increase in AR mRNA stability. However, in MDA453 cells, posttranscriptional destabilization of AR mRNA appears to be the predominant mechanism resulting in down-regulation of AR mRNA by androgen. These results demonstrate cell-specific and divergent regulation of AR mRNA turnover by androgen and identify a novel pathway of androgen-induced posttranscriptional destabilization and down-regulation of AR mRNA in human breast cancer cells. Furthermore, these data establish an important role for posttranscriptional pathways in the regulation of AR gene expression by androgen in human prostate and breast cancer cells.

Hormonal regulation of the androgen receptor expression in human prostatic cells in culture

The regulation of the androgen receptor (AR) expression was studied using immunocytochemical and Western blot techniques on separate cultures of epithelial cells (PNT2) and fibroblasts of human prostate. In both cell types, immunocytochemistry revealed both nuclear and cytoplasmic staining. Treatment with DHT (5 x 10(-9) M) increased both the intensity of nuclear staining and the number of cells stained. The increase, observed after DHT treatment was markedly decreased by cyproterone acetate (5 x 10(-7) M), confirming a direct action of DHT via the AR. This autoregulation of AR was confirmed by Western blot, and seems to involve transcription and protein synthesis, since it was suppressed by actinomycin D and cycloheximide. In fibroblasts, known to contain an estrogen receptor, estradiol treatment (5 x 10(-7) M) also increases the AR immunostaining. In addition, coculture studies show that epithelial cells require the presence of fibroblasts for optimal expression of the AR. These results demonstrate that prostate epithelial cells and fibroblasts have retained in culture, an hormonal sensitivity correlated with the presence of specific receptors and can serve as a model for the study of hormone action in this tissue in normal or pathological conditions.

Quantitation of androgen receptor messenger RNA from genital skin fibroblasts by reverse transcription--competitive polymerase chain reaction

To gain further information concerning the regulation by androgen of AR mRNA expression in cultured genital skin fibroblasts (GSF), we first developed a quantitative reverse transcription-competitive polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). This method used an ethidium bromide stain analysis of the PCR products for the accurate quantitation of low levels of human androgen receptor (hAR) mRNA in GSF. To control for variations due to sample preparation, and to minimize the disparity of the reverse transcriptase efficiency between samples after the RT procedure, we produced an initial PCR for the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene, and then adjusted the amount of cDNA to that of this housekeeping gene. Competitive PCR for hAR was then immediately performed on normalized cDNA with a competitor DNA that exhibited a 13 bp deletion as compared to the 163 bp for the target fragment, and the PCR products were easily separated by 3.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. This quantitation procedure involved no additional steps, such as enzymatic cleavage of the PCR products, nor the use of radioactivity. In GSF from individuals, we found that the normal amount of AR mRNA was 5.6 attomoles/microg RNA, (+/-1.0, s.e.m.) with an intra- and an inter-assay of 8.4 and 14.7%, respectively. We observed a biphasic pattern of AR mRNA expression in normal human GSF in the presence of physiological concentration of androgen. Quantitative RT-PCR of AR mRNA may be useful for studying AR mRNA expression in experimental or clinical conditions.

Transcriptional regulation of the steroid receptor genes

Steroid hormones, via their binding to specific receptors, are involved in the development, differentiation, and physiological response of cells to diverse stimuli. Activation by hormonal ligands induces conformational change in the receptor, enabling interaction with the target genes. The steroid receptor superfamily includes androgen, glucocorticoid, mineralocorticoid, progesterone, estrogen, thyroid, vitamin D, retinoic acid, and orphan receptors. This review will focus on the classic steroid receptors, i.e., the androgen, glucocorticoid, progesterone, and estrogen receptors, with emphasis on their transcriptional regulation. Readers are directed to several authoritative reviews for further details of steroid receptors (1-11).

Autoregulation of androgen receptor in rat ventral prostate: involvement of c-fos as a negative regulator

Recent work from our laboratory has focused on elucidating the mechanism of androgen regulation of the androgen receptor (AR). We have demonstrated that testosterone increases AR protein and binding within 1 h in the ventral prostate of adult rats castrated for 24 h. Cycloheximide administered with testosterone reduces AR and AR mRNA levels. AP-1/c-fos transcription factor has been shown to function as a negative in many systems. c-fos mRNA levels were decreased 1 h after testosterone treatment in the ventral prostate, whereas they were increased in cycloheximide alone or cycloheximide-testosterone treated groups as compared to vehicle control. c-fos protein was also increased in the testosterone-cycloheximide treated group as compared to testosterone alone or cycloheximide alone groups at 1 h. By 3 h, the tissue recovers from the inhibitory effect of cycloheximide as evidenced by restoration of AR and an increase in AR mRNA levels. At this time c-fos protein levels were reduced after treatment with cycloheximide and testosterone and c-fos mRNA levels were comparable to the controls. These results suggest that elevation of c-fos expression is associated with a decrease in AR and mRNA and provide correlative data supporting negative repression by c-fos on androgen receptors levels. Between the age of 25-85 days, serum testosterone levels reached adult levels by the age of 55 days. Steady-state AR mRNA levels increased significantly by the age of 85 days while c-fos mRNA levels remained at low baseline levels at all ages. Thus, in addition to the circulating levels of serum testosterone, other age related factors are also involved in the regulation of AR mRNA levels. Furthermore, androgens appear to maintain androgen receptor levels and androgen sensitivity by continuous suppression of the repressor, c-fos.

Androgenic up-regulation of androgen receptor cDNA expression in androgen-independent prostate cancer cells

The expression of the androgen receptor (AR) gene is regulated by androgens. Although androgens down-regulate AR mRNA in most cell lines and tissues, including the prostate, up-regulation occurs in some tissues. Androgen-mediated reduction in AR mRNA is reproduced in COS1 cells and in the androgen-sensitive human prostate cancer cell line LNCaP when each expresses the AR cDNA. We have previously established that the AR cDNA contains the requisite sequences for this down-regulation. Here we shown that androgen promoted up-regulation of AR mRNA in two androgen-independent human prostate cancer cell lines, PC3 and DU145, when each was transfected with a human AR cDNA. This effect was due to the AR cDNA and not to the heterologous promoter driving AR expression. In addition to up-regulation of AR mRNA, androgen induced comparable increases in AR protein levels in PC3 cells stably expressing an AR cDNA (PC3/AR). Up-regulation of AR in PC3/AR cells was accompanied by failure of these cells to undergo desensitization or inactivation of AR following prolonged (96 h) androgen administration, whereas the same conditions resulted in desensitization of AR transactivation in LNCaP cells and in CVl cells that stably express the AR cDNA. Androgen treatment of PC3/AR cells resulted in induction of an androgen-regulated reporter gene (MMTV-CAT) as well as the native prostate-specific antigen gene, which is silent in untransfected PC3 but is androgen up-regulated in LNCaP and in the prostate. These results suggest that ectopic expression of AR in androgen-independent prostate cancer cell lines establishes both typical and atypical androgenic responses in a target gene-specific manner. Androgenic up-regulation of AR cDNA expression may be due to distinct signaling mechanisms that influence androgen action in androgen-independent prostate cancer cells.

Functional analysis of the human androgen receptor promoter

Although androgen receptor levels vary widely during development, our previous studies have suggested that a single promoter is active in a number of human and rat tissues and cell lines. To examine the elements controlling androgen receptor expression, we performed deletion mapping and site-directed mutagenesis of the human androgen receptor promoter and assayed these promoter fusions in human cell lines that produce the androgen receptor as well as those deficient in the androgen receptor, both in the presence and absence of androgen. Our studies identify a region (-74 to +87) surrounding the site of transcription initiation that constitutes the core of the androgen receptor promoter. When assayed in T47D cells (an AR-expressing cell line), this segment was sufficient to direct the expression of reporter genes at levels similar to that observed for larger promoter fragments, and further deletions led to an appreciable loss of promoter activity. DNA sequences surrounding this region appear to modulate the activity of this minimal promoter in a cooperative fashion. Site-directed mutagenesis and mobility shift assays demonstrated the importance of regulatory regions upstream of the transcription initiation site including an SP1 binding site and two segments with similarities to consensus HLH protein binding sites (E-boxes). Androgen treatment did not cause a decrease in activity of any of the transiently transfected promoter fusions tested, suggesting that the promoter does not contain the information necessary for autoregulation or that a posttranscriptional or posttranslational mechanism is responsible for the regulation of AR mRNA by ligand. Furthermore, the androgen receptor promoter fusions displayed differing transcriptional activities when transfected into two cell lines deficient in androgen receptor expression suggesting heterogeneity in the mechanisms responsible for this deficiency.