Long-term results of infusional 5-FU, mitomycin-C and radiation as primary management of esophageal carcinoma

Neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy for resectable esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Carcinoma of the esophagus is an aggressive malignancy with an increasing incidence. Its virulence, in terms of symptoms and mortality, justifies a continued search for optimal therapy. The large and growing number of patients affected, the high mortality rates, the worldwide geographic variation in practice, and the large body of good quality research warrants a systematic review with meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the impact of neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy on resectable thoracic esophageal cancer to inform evidence-based practice was produced.MEDLINE, CANCERLIT, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology were searched for trial reports. Included were randomized trials or meta-analyses of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatments compared with surgery alone or other treatments in patients with resectable thoracic esophageal cancer. Outcomes of interest were survival, adverse effects, and quality of life. Either one- or three-year mortality data were pooled and reported as relative risk ratios.

RESULTS

Thirty-four randomized controlled trials and six meta-analyses were obtained and grouped into 13 basic treatment approaches. Single randomized controlled trials detected no differences in mortality between treatments for the following comparisons:- Preoperative radiotherapy versus postoperative radiotherapy.- Preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy versus postoperative radiotherapy. Preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy was associated with a significantly higher mortality rate.- Postoperative chemotherapy versus postoperative radiotherapy.- Postoperative radiotherapy versus postoperative radiotherapy plus protein-bound polysaccharide versus chemoradiation versus chemoradiation plus protein-bound polysaccharide. Pooling one-year mortality detected no statistically significant differences in mortality between treatments for the following comparisons:- Preoperative radiotherapy compared with surgery alone (five randomized trials).- Postoperative radiotherapy compared with surgery alone (five randomized trials).- Preoperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone (six randomized trials).- Preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone (two randomized trials).- Preoperative chemoradiation therapy versus surgery alone (six randomized trials). Single randomized controlled trials detected differences in mortality between treatments for the following comparison:- Preoperative hyperthermia and chemoradiotherapy versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy in favour of hyperthermia. Pooling three-year mortality detected no statistically significant difference in mortality between treatments for the following comparison:- Postoperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone (two randomized trials). Pooling three-year mortality detected statistically significant differences between treatments for the following comparisons:- Preoperative chemoradiation therapy versus surgery alone (six randomized trials) in favour of preoperative chemoradiation with surgery.- Preoperative chemotherapy compared with preoperative radiotherapy (one randomized trial) in favour of preoperative radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

For adult patients with resectable thoracic esophageal cancer for whom surgery is considered appropriate, surgery alone (i.e., without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy) is recommended as the standard practice.

Neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy for resectable esophageal cancer: a clinical practice guideline

Background

Carcinoma of the esophagus is an aggressive malignancy with an increasing incidence. Its virulence, in terms of symptoms and mortality, justifies a continued search for optimal therapy. A clinical practice guideline was developed based on a systematic review investigating neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy on resectable thoracic esophageal cancer.

Methods

A systematic review with meta-analysis was developed and clinical recommendations were drafted. External review of the practice guideline report by practitioners in Ontario, Canada was obtained through a mailed survey, and incorporated. Final approval of the practice guideline was obtained from the Practice Guidelines Coordinating Committee.

Results

The systematic review was developed and recommendations were drafted, and the report was mailed to Ontario practitioners for external review. Ninety percent of respondents agreed with both the evidence summary and the draft recommendations, while only 69% approved of the draft recommendations as a practice guideline. Based on the external review, a revised document was created. The revised practice guideline was submitted to the Practice Guidelines Coordinating Committee for review. All 11 members of the PGCC returned ballots. Eight PGCC members approved the practice guideline report as written and three members approved the guideline conditional on specific concerns being addressed. After these recommended changes were made, the final practice guideline report was approved.

Conclusion

In consideration of the systematic review, external review, and subsequent Practice Guidelines Coordinating Committee revision suggestions, and final approval, the Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site Group recommends the following:

For adult patients with resectable thoracic esophageal cancer for whom surgery is considered appropriate, surgery alone (i.e., without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy) is recommended as the standard practice.

Should preoperative, post-chemoradiotherapy endoscopy be routine for esophageal cancer patients?

Chemoradiation therapy is used widely for locoregional esophageal cancer. Patients with persistent disease may benefit from surgery. Preoperative esophagoscopy can identify persistent tumor but its accuracy is uncertain. The primary objective of this study is to assess the extent of agreement between esophagoscopy and surgical pathology in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation. A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent chemoradiation, preoperative endoscopy and surgery from January 1996 to December 2002 was performed. Cohen's kappa statistic was used to measure the degree of agreement between findings at endoscopic biopsy and surgical pathology. Thirty cases were identified. All patients received chemoradiation followed by surgical resection. There was insufficient agreement between tumor size (kappa 0.25, standard error 0.17, P = 0.07) and appearance (kappa 0.19, standard error 0.18, P = 0.14). Preoperative endoscopy revealed atypia/inflammation in 15 cases and dysplasia in eight. Of these 23 cases, 11 were adenocarcinomas at surgery. Only nine patients had concurrence between surgical pathology and endoscopy. The positive and negative predictive values of esophagoscopy for identifying residual tumor were 100% and 11%, respectively. Our data suggests that after chemoradiation, esophagoscopy is unreliable for excluding residual disease. The roles of other modalities need to be explored.

Multiple Management Modalities in Esophageal Cancer: Combined Modality Management Approaches

The overall success rate nationally in treating esophageal carcinomas remains poor, with over 90% of patients succumbing to the disease. In part I of this two-part series, we explored epidemiology, presentation and progression, work-up, and surgical approaches. In part II, we explore the promising suggestions of integrating chemotherapy and radiation therapy into the multimodal management of esophageal cancers. Alternative approaches to resection alone have been sought because of the overall poor survival rates of esophageal cancer patients, with failures occurring both local-regionally and distantly. Concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy (XRT) have been shown, by randomized trial, to be more effective than XRT alone in treating unresectable esophageal cancers and also have shown promise as a neoadjuvant treatment when combined with surgery in the multimodal treatment of this disease. Various studies have also addressed issues such as preoperative chemotherapy, radiation dose escalation, chemotherapy/XRT as a definitive treatment versus use as a surgical adjuvant, and alternative chemotherapy regimens. There are suggestions of some progress, but this remains a difficult problem area in which management is continuing to evolve.

Definitive chemoradiation in patients with inoperable oesophageal carcinoma

We performed a retrospective study of 90 consecutive cases with inoperable carcinoma of the oesophagus treated with definitive chemoradiation at a single cancer centre between 1995 and 2002. For the last 4 years, 73 patients have received therapy according to an agreed protocol. This outpatient-based regimen involves four cycles of chemotherapy, cycles 3 and 4 given concurrently with 50 Gy external beam radiotherapy (XRT) delivered in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. Cisplatin 60 mg m(-2) day(-1) is given every 3 weeks together with continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil 300 mg m(-2) day(-1), reduced to 225 mg m(-2) day(-1) during the XRT. In all, 45 (50%) patients suffered one or more WHO grade 3/4 toxicity, grade 3 in 93% cases. Patients received more than 90% of the planned chemoradiation schedule. The median overall survival was 26 (15, >96) months, 51% (41, 64) and 26% (13, 52) surviving 2 and 5 years, respectively. Advanced stage, particularly T4 disease, was associated with a worse prognosis. Patients considered not suitable for surgery for reasons other than their disease, mainly co-morbidity, had a significantly better outcome, median survival 40 (26, >96) months, 2- and 5-year survivals 67% (54, 84) and 32% (13, 79), respectively (P<0.001). This schedule is a feasible, tolerable and effective treatment for patients with oesophageal cancer considered unsuitable for surgery.

Endoscopic response predicts for survival and organ preservation after primary chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the role of endoscopic surveillance in predicting organ preservation and survival after primary chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for esophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-six consecutive patients with nonmetastatic esophageal cancer were treated with primary CRT between May 1993 and April 1999 with curative intent and subsequent surveillance with endoscopy and CT scans. Patients with residual disease on endoscopy and/or CT 6 weeks after CRT were considered for immediate esophagectomy. The remaining patients continued endoscopic surveillance and were considered for esophagectomy only when local relapse was detected. Five-year survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify significant factors associated with disease-specific survival.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 62 months, the 5-year overall and disease-specific survival was 30% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17%-43%) and 37% (95% CI: 22%-50%), respectively. Fourteen of 24 (58%) patients who survived more than 2 years did not require an esophagectomy. On univariate analysis, favorable prognostic factors for disease-specific survival were female gender (p = 0.026), CT-defined N(0) status (p = 0.027), and negative endoscopy at 6 weeks after CRT (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, N(0) status and negative endoscopy after CRT remained significant (p = 0.03 and p < 0.0001, respectively) for disease-specific survival. On multivariate analysis for overall survival, female gender and negative endoscopy were significant (p = 0.35 and p < 0.001, respectively). The hazard ratios for disease-specific survival with positive nodal status and positive endoscopy were 2.44 (95% CI: 1.14-5.3) and 5.18 (95% CI: 2.3-11.6), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic response after primary CRT for esophageal cancer was the most significant predictive factor for overall and disease-specific survival. Regular endoscopic surveillance after CRT achieved survival rates comparable to other strategies and successfully preserved the esophagus in the majority of patients who survived more than 2 years.

Process and preliminary outcome of a patterns-of-care study of esophageal cancer in Japan: patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the quality of radiotherapy (RT) in Japan, we have been carrying out a national survey through patterns-of-care studies (PCSs) since 1996. We present the preliminary results of surgery combined with RT with or without chemotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A Japanese PCS data format for esophageal cancer was established based on one used in the United States and including information used in the surgical registration system in Japan, so that the results in both countries could be compared. An independent panel of radiation oncologists surveyed randomly selected institutions and patients between September 1998 and March 2001. There were 767 esophageal cancer patients, of whom 220 had undergone preoperative or postoperative RT.

RESULTS

The median age of the 220 patients was 62.3 years (range 31-89); of them, 88.1% were men. Pathologically, 218 patients (99.5%) had squamous cell carcinoma, predominantly located in the middle and lower thoracic esophagus, 41.7% of the patients had Stage III disease; they accounted for 52.6% of patients in nonacademic institutions and for 37.7% of those in academic institutions (p = 0.016). Sixty-nine patients received preoperative RT; of them, 60.9% received chemotherapy; 145 patients received postoperative RT with or without chemotherapy. The spinal cord of 23 (11.7%) of 196 patients was irradiated with >/=50 Gy. In academic institutions, extended radical "three-field" lymphatic dissection was performed for 72 (48.7%) of 148 patients; however, this sophisticated surgical procedure was done in only 13 (25.5%) of 51 patients in nonacademic settings (p = 0.004). In all large academic institutions (those treating >/=300 patients annually), >/=6 MV of photon energy was used; 30.5% of nonacademic institutes had linear accelerators of <6 MV photon (p = 0.001). No deviations occurred in the radiation dose (median 46 Gy), fractionations, or fields between the two types of institutions. Univariate analyses showed that the statistically significant prognostic factors affecting overall survival were stage (p = 0.001), extended radical "three-field" lymphatic dissection (p = 0.001), no residual tumor (p = 0.001), supraclavicular RT (p = 0.001), mediastinal RT (p = 0.025), Karnofsky performance status (p = 0.006) photon energy (p = 0.011), and stratification of the institutions (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that the type of institution (p = 0.045, risk ratio = 0.604), stage (p 0.029, risk ratio = 0.572), no residual tumor (p = 0.006, risk ratio = 0.487), photon energy (p = 0.043, risk ratio = 0.579), and use of chemotherapy (p = 0.012, risk ratio = 1.907) significantly affected overall survival.

CONCLUSION

This PCS showed that in Japan important issues are present regarding RT for esophageal cancer that should be solved immediately, namely, treatment strategy, photon energy, and dose applied to the spinal cord. The PCS provided important information on how much improvement in structure and process would be required nationwide for RT of esophageal cancer.

Planejamento tridimensional para radioterapia de tumores de esôfago: comparação de técnicas de tratamento e análise de probabilidade de complicações

Para comparar diversas técnicas de irradiação para o câncer de esôfago, foi utilizado sistema de planejamento tridimensional. Em um paciente com carcinoma espinocelular de esôfago médio, foram estudadas as seguintes técnicas de tratamento: dois campos ântero-posteriores e dois campos látero-laterais paralelos e opostos, três campos em "Y" e em "T" e quatro campos em "X". Foram obtidos os histogramas dose-volume, considerando como órgãos de risco medula espinhal e pulmões. Os resultados foram analisados de acordo com as recomendações da Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) e Tumor Control Probability (TCP). Quanto às doses de irradiação em pulmão, a melhor opção foi a técnica em dois campos ântero-posteriores paralelos e opostos. A medula foi mais poupada quando se utilizaram campos látero-laterais. Sugerimos a combinação de pelo menos duas técnicas de tratamento: ântero-posterior e as técnicas com campos em "Y", "T" ou látero-laterais, para o balanceamento das doses em pulmões e medula espinhal. Ou, ainda, a utilização de técnicas de três campos durante todo o tratamento.

New approach to malignant strictures of the esophagus

Primary esophageal cancer is the most common cause of malignant esophageal stricture. Prognosis and treatment outcomes vary with the stage of the disease. Endoscopic ultrasound has a high accuracy rate for local and regional staging. Surgery is curative for early cancer. Endoscopic mucosal resection, photodynamic therapy, or brachytherapy can be used with curative intent for early cancer, especially in patients with comorbid conditions precluding surgery. Unfortunately, the majority of patients with esophageal cancer present with advanced disease. The primary aim in these patients is to alleviate symptoms with a minimum of side effects and reinterventions. Palliative surgery or chemoradiotherapy can be associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Several endoscopic techniques for palliation are available, and all have the potential of significantly improving swallowing. The choice of a particular endoscopic approach is usually determined by local expertise and characteristics of the stricture.

A phase I/II study of CHARTWEL with concurrent chemotherapy in locally advanced, inoperable carcinoma of the oesophagus

AIM

To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and toxicity of concurrent chemotherapy and continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy weekend less (CHARTWEL) in the treatment of locally advanced, inoperable oesophageal cancer.

METHODS

A prospective study of 19 patients with histologically confirmed, locally advanced, inoperable carcinoma of the oesophagus. CHARTWEL was prescribed from day 1 to doses of 40.5 Gy (three patients), 42 Gy (five patients), 45 Gy (four patients), 46.5 Gy (three patients) and 49.5 Gy (four patients). Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 was administered on day 1 of radiotherapy, followed by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 1000 mg daily for 4 days.

RESULTS

All patients completed radiotherapy, with two requiring modification of their chemotherapy dose. Acute toxicity was acceptable, with no interruptions to treatment. The median dysphagia free time was 9.6 months with 38% of patients being dysphagia free at 42 months. The median time to locoregional relapse was 13.2 months with 50% being free at 1 year and 35% at 3.5 years. There was a trend towards greater control when the higher doses (45-49.5 Gy) were compared with the lower doses (40.5-42 Gy), P = 0.07. The median survival time was 10.7 months with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 50 and 26%, respectively. Strictures developed in seven out of 18 patients (38%), but five were found on biopsy to be due to recurrent disease. There was no other long-term toxicity and no treatment-related death occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

CHARTWEL with concomitant cisplatin/5-FU chemotherapy is a feasible treatment option in these patients. It is well tolerated, achieves a high rate of local control and effectively palliates the symptoms of dysphagia, all with relatively rapid resolution of treatment-related toxicity. The results warrant continued dose escalation to 51 Gy.

Surgery after induction chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer

AIM

We discuss the role of surgery after induction chemoradiotherapy, when a complete response is apparent.

METHODS

We enrolled 247 consecutive patients who underwent chemoradiotherapy and oesophagectomy for cancer. Patients were classified in two groups as to whether they had chemoradiotherapy (n = 60) or not (n = 187) before surgery.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate of patients with complete response was 54% and was significantly higher than that of the other group (P = 0.018). Of the 60 patients responding, 34 (56.7%) were found to have a complete pathological tumour response (pT0). The overall sensitivity and specificity of the post-chemoradiotherapy restaging were 60.7% and 86.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete response after induction chemoradiotherapy is not a reliable tool in the management of oesophageal cancer. We need to improve postchemoradiotherapy restaging to be sure that chemoradiotherapy will provide the same long-term survival rates as surgery.

Impact of tumor hypoxia and anemia on radiation therapy outcomes

Local recurrence remains a major obstacle to achieving cure of many locally advanced solid tumors treated with definitive radiation therapy. The microenvironment of solid tumors is hypoxic compared with normal tissue, and this hypoxia is associated with decreased radiosensitivity. Recent preclinical data also suggest that intratumoral hypoxia, particularly in conjunction with an acid microenvironment, may be directly or indirectly mutagenic. Investigations of the prognostic significance of the pretreatment oxygenation status of tumors in patients with head and neck or cervical cancer have demonstrated that increased hypoxia, typically designated in these studies as pO(2) levels below 2.5-10 mm Hg, is associated with decreased local tumor control and lower rates of disease-free and overall survival. Hypoxia-directed therapies in the radiation oncology setting include treatment using hyperbaric oxygen, fluosol infusion, carbogen breathing, and electron-affinic and hypoxic-cell sensitizers. These interventions have shown the potential to increase the effectiveness of curative-intent radiation therapy, demonstrating that the strategy of overcoming hypoxia may be a viable and important approach. Anemia is common in the cancer population and is suspected to contribute to intratumoral hypoxia. A review of the literature reveals that a low hemoglobin level before or during radiation therapy is an important risk factor for poor locoregional disease control and survival, implying that a strong correlation could exist between anemia and hypoxia (ultimately predicting for a poor outcome). While having a low hemoglobin level has been shown to be detrimental, it is unclear as to exactly what the threshold for "low" should be (studies in this area have used thresholds ranging from 9-14.5 g/dl). Optimal hemoglobin and pO(2) thresholds for improving outcomes may vary across and within tumor types, and this is an area that clearly requires further evaluation. Nonetheless, the correction of anemia may be a worthwhile strategy for radiation oncologists to improve local control and survival.

Definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with malignant stricture due to T3 or T4 squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus

We retrospectively investigated the efficacy and feasibility of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with severe dysphagia caused by oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy was performed in 57 patients with T3 or T4 disease containing M1 lymph node (LYM) disease. Chemotherapy consisted of protracted infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg m(-2) 24 h(-1) on days 1-5 and 8-12, combined with 2-h infusion of cisplatin (CDDP) 40 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 8. Radiation treatment at a dose of 30 Gy in 15 fractions of the mediastinum was administered concomitantly with chemotherapy. A course schedule with 3-week treatment and a 1 to 2-week break was applied twice, with a total radiation dose of 60 Gy, followed by two or more courses of 5-FU and CDDP. In all, 24 patients (42%) achieved a complete response, and the 3-year survival rate was 19%. Major toxicities were leukocytopenia and oesophagitis, and there were two (4%) treatment-related deaths. In contrast, 22 patients with T3 disease survived longer than 35 patients with T4 disease (P=0.001); however, the survival rate in 15 patients with M1 LYM disease did not differ significantly from that in 42 patients without M1 LYM disease (P=0.3545). Our results indicate that definitive chemoradiotherapy is potentially curative for locally advanced oesophageal carcinoma with malignant stricture. The efficacy and survival of patients treated with this regimen are related to the T factor.

Prognostic value of TP53 transcriptional activity on p21 and bax in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinomas treated by definitive chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate biologic factors on survival and clinical response after definitive concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

TP53 protein hyperexpression (immunochemistry [IHC]) and functional assay (FA) of TP53, measuring the ability of TP53 to transactivate p21 and bax reporter systems, were performed in patients with ESCC treated by CRT. The impact of parameters studied on survival and clinical response to CRT was assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients with ESCC were included. TP53 alterations were detected in 84.2% of cases with FA. All TP53 mutations abolished the transactivation of p21 and bax reporter systems. After CRT, complete response rate was 55.3%. The median survival of the population was 17.5 months. Serum albumin (p = 0.002), weight loss <10% (p = 0.005), and response to treatment (p < 0.001) were significantly linked with survival. TP53 alteration in FA was not significantly predictive of response to CRT (p = 0.132) nor survival (p = 0.154).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that wild-type TP53 in ESCC could be associated with good response to definitive CRT. However, the small rate of ESCC with wild-type TP53 suggests that systematic determination of TP53 status is not appropriate for the management of the ESCC population.

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: a phase II study

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the concurrent treatment of chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy in the management of locoregional esophageal carcinoma. The main end points were to determine the resectability of the tumor and the pathologic tumor response. An accessory aim was to evaluate the survival rate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients were treated as follows: 5-fluoruracil, 1,000 mg/m(2), by 24-h IV infusion for 4 days, and cisplatin, 100 mg/m(2), on day 1. Concurrent radiotherapy was delivered at a total dose of 40 Gy in daily fractions of 2 Gy five times per week. The performance of an esophagectomy was planned 4 weeks after induction treatment and restaging.

RESULTS

All patients completed the preoperative treatment. A potentially radical resection was performed in 29 patients, and a complete or partial histologically proven response was observed in 9 patients (23%) and 20 patients (51%), respectively. The 3-year overall survival rate was 40%. The 3-year rates of overall survival and disease-free survival were 88% and 76%, respectively, in patients with complete response (p < 0.0012), and 16% and 17%, respectively, in patients with partial response (p < 0.0013). Age, histology, and response represented the best prognostic model related to survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this combined approach appear to be better than those reported with surgery alone. Despite the small number of patients in the series and the inclusion of patients with different histotypes, we concluded that patients with the squamous histotype show a better outcome than those with adenocarcinoma.

Phase I study of gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in patients with advanced esophageal cancer

The prognosis for advanced esophageal carcinoma is poor with a median survival of 9-12 months and 5-year-survival rate of 10-20%. Combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is considered to be the standard therapy, but has a high potential of side effects and is usually not given on an ambulatory basis. This phase I study was designed to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly cisplatin in combination with standard doses of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2), 30 min) and 5-FU (750 mg/m(2), 24 h)/folinic acid (200 mg/m(2), 30 min). All drugs were to be given on a day 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 6-weekly cycle in an outpatient setting. Nineteen chemonaive patients with inoperable stage IIa, III and IV squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were enrolled into the study. Eight, six and five patients were enrolled at cisplatin dose levels 0 (20 mg/m(2) ), I (25 mg/m(2) ) and II (30 mg/m(2)), respectively. One hundred and eighty-one out of 187 treatments (55 cycles) were given on an outpatient basis. The dose-limiting toxicities of this schedule were leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. Other side effects were mild. Dose level II (30 mg/m(2)) was defined as the MTD for cisplatin when used in this combination and schedule. Partial responses were observed in 10 of the 19 enrolled patients. The side effect profile seen in this study in combination with the preliminary evidence of efficacy justifies further testing in a phase II setting with a cisplatin dose of 25 mg/m(2) and offers a treatment option for patients in an outpatient setting.

Endoluminal palliation for dysphagia secondary to esophageal carcinoma

There are now a variety of treatment options available to palliate dysphagia in patients with advanced esophageal carcinoma. The decision as to which therapy to recommend for a patient should be based on a though understanding of the therapies and must be individualized for each patient and on the experience of the endoscopist or surgeon. In addition, consideration should be given as to resource availability at a particular institution. External beam radiation currently has little role as primary treatment for dysphagia. Brachytherapy is labor intensive; requires 2 to 3 weekly treatments, highly specialized radiation equipment, and an experienced radiation oncologist; and is therefore limited to tertiary care centers. Endoluminal YAG-laser tumor ablation is feasible at many institutions and provides immediate dysphagia relief but has limited durability (weeks) if not followed by adjuvant therapy, and requires an endoscopist with significant laser experience. PDT is relatively easy to perform and has a lower perforation rate and longer durability than YAG laser therapy but it is relatively costly and less patient friendly due to the morbidity of its attendant 6 weeks of photosensitivity. Advances in stent technology have rendered this a safe, readily available treatment for the palliation of dysphagia. Palliation of dysphagia is an important but difficult goal that may require creative use of a variety of endoscopic interventions, either in combination or serially. Ideally, physicians who palliate dysphagia secondary to esophageal cancer should be facile in both endoscopic ablative and stenting techniques and have a close working relationship with both radiation and medical oncologists.

Chemoradiotherapy of esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer is a disease with a poor prognosis and high biological aggressiveness. The disease used to be considered a mainly local problem, and palliative care with relief of dysphagia was the goal for most of those concerned with the disease. When surgical techniques were improved and parallel progress was made in intensive care and postoperative care, some patients could be cured of the disease. The development of pre- or postoperative radiotherapy also improved local control. Partly because of the interest that began to be focused on improving survival for this diagnostic group, chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy has been incorporated into the therapeutic arsenal. The aim of this review is to shed light on current treatment principles for esophageal cancer. However, treatment results from studies utilizing combination chemotherapy given concurrently with radiotherapy support the conclusion that well-designed randomized trials with long-term follow-ups should be performed.

Phase II trial of continuous infusion carboplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and radiotherapy for localized cancer of the esophagus

The aim of this study was to determine the toxicity, response rate, failure-free survival, and overall survival in a treatment program comprising continuous infusion carboplatin, short in-fusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and radiotherapy for localized carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. To be eligible, patients were required to have Karnofsky performance status greater than or equal to 60, adequate organ function, and have received no prior therapy. Planned radiation dose was 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. 5-FU was to be administered commencing days 1 and 29 of radiotherapy, and given at a dose of 1 g/m2/d for 4 days as a continuous infusion. Carboplatin was to commence on day 1 of radiotherapy and be given throughout the period of radiation as a continuous infusion. The starting dose of carboplatin was 28 mg/m2/d. The protocol specified a 25% dose reduction of carboplatin if more than two of the first six patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). DLT was defined as grade IV neutropenia lasting more than 7 days, grade IV thrombocytopenia, or any grade IV nonhematologic toxicity. All 23 patients in the study received protocol radio-therapy, except one who was given an extra 10 Gy. Seven patients received carboplatin at 28 mg/m2/d and 16 received 21 mg/m2/d. Hematologic DLTs were experienced by all of the seven patients receiving the higher dose. No patients in the low-dose group experienced hematologic DLTs, and only 2 of 16 ceased chemotherapy early because of myelosuppression. Three patients in the low-dose group experienced grade IV esophagitis but were able to complete protocol radiotherapy. Apart from esophagitis, nonhematologic toxicity was generally moderate or mild. Six patients had thrombosis complicating the central venous catheters. Endoscopy was performed in 21 patients (91%), with an overall complete response rate of 65% (CI: 43-84%) for the whole group or 71% (CI: 48-89%) for the endoscopically evaluated group. Estimated median failure-free survival time was 8.9 months (CI: 7.1-12.9), and estimated median overall survival time was 21.4 months (CI: 9.6 -35.4). Carboplatin at 21 mg/m2/d as a continuous infusion may be given safely in combination with short infusional 5-FU and radiotherapy for localized carcinoma of the esophagus. This combination has resulted in response data comparable to that of larger studies of cisplatin-containing regimens and warrants further study, ideally in a phase III randomized controlled trial.

Bi-modality (chemo-radiation) versus tri-modality (chemo-radiation followed by surgery) treatment for carcinoma of the esophagus

The purpose of the study was to investigate the difference in overall survival in patients with localized carcinoma of esophagus treated using chemo-radiation (bi-modality, BM) or chemo-radiation followed by surgery (tri-modality, TM). From 1981 to 1999, 65 patients were identified who had localized carcinoma of the esophagus treated with either concurrent chemo-radiation (BM, n=22) or concurrent chemo-radiation followed by surgery (TM, n=43) at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston. All 65 patients received concurrent chemotherapy and external beam radiation. Radiation was delivered by linear accelerators (greater-than-or-equal 6 MV), except in one patient who had part of his treatment given by a Co-60 machine. Chemotherapy consisted of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin plus minus vinblastine under different regimens. Median follow-up time was 10 months (range=1-195 months) for all patients. Of the 14 patients still alive, the median follow-up time was 32 months (range=2-192 months). No difference in overall survival was detected between the two treatment groups, BM vs. TM (P=0.394) despite a selection bias favoring the TM group. Five-year survival rates of the BM and TM groups were 17% and 18%, respectively; 10-year survival rates were 17% and 12%, respectively. The presence of significant past medical history (P=0.017) and a complete pathologic response in the TM group (P < 0.001) were significant independent predictors of survival. We did not find any difference in survival between chemo-radiation or chemo-radiation followed by surgery in patients with localized carcinoma of the esophagus. Use of biologic markers and functional imaging should be explored in order to segregate patients with different tumor biology for treatment using different treatment strategies.

Methods of palliation of esophageal and gastric cancer

Esophageal and gastric malignancies are common worldwide. Less than half are amenable to curative treatment at the time of diagnosis because of advanced or metastatic disease. Palliation is often required for symptoms, such as dysphagia, gastrointestinal bleeding, aspiration caused by tracheoesophageal fistula, nausea and emesis secondary to gastric outlet obstruction, and malnutrition. This article reviews the gastric outlet obstruction, and malnutrition. This article reviews the medical, endoscopic, and surgical options for palliative treatment.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with surgically treated esophageal cancer

Over the past 10 years, 232 patients were treated at the East Carolina School of Medicine for cancer of the esophagus. Of these, 73 received neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and subsequent surgical resection. The results in this group suggest improved cancer control, with 18 patients (25%) remaining free of recurrence 3 years after treatment, compared with 11 out of 159 patients (7%) in the group that was not treated with neoadjuvant therapy (p < 0.0001). The 5-year recurrence-free survival with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery was 16% (12/73) compared with 3% (5/159) with other types of therapy. Two protocols of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with subsequent surgery were compared: I: Split-course, once-a-day radiotherapy and concomitant cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil followed by esophagectomy. II: Accelerated, twice-a-day radiotherapy with concomitant triple chemotherapy using cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil/vinblastine followed by transhiatal extrathoracic esophagectomy. The survival rate was similar in the two groups of patients but the complication rate was higher in group II. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and the techniques of transhiatal esophagectomy may have contributed to the improved results in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma. Accelerated radiotherapy with triple chemotherapy was more toxic and did not give better survival rates than split-course, once-a-day, conventional, fractionated-protracted radiotherapy combined with two drugs.

Current status of surgery for carcinoma of the hypopharynx and cervical esophagus

Hypopharynx and cervical esophagus represent a critical location for a squamous cell carcinoma, a neoplasm that usually requires extensive surgery. Although morbidity and mortality of resection have markedly decreased over the past decade, the major issue in these patients remains quality of life owing to the need for combination with a laryngectomy to provide radical treatment. Chemoradiation therapy has the potential to downstage and even cure the disease without altering quality of life dramatically. Today, in the absence of randomized trials, the choice between surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy should be based on clear information and the patient's preference. Salvage surgery is feasible and effective in selected patients.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus treated with radiation and 5-fluorouracil, with and without mitomycin C

A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus without evidence of distant metastases, who were treated with radical intent. Between 1981 and 1984, and 1989 and 1991, 98 patients were treated with radiation, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C; and between 1984 and 1989, 133 patients were treated with radiation and 5-FU without mitomycin C. Actuarial survival and local control were assessed, and prognostic factors were identified for both endpoints. The standard dose of radiation prescribed was 52 Gy to the 95% isodose in 20 fractions over 4 weeks. 5-FU was given by continuous infusion as 1 g/m2 (maximum 1.5 g)/day, for 4 days. Patients who received mitomycin C were given 10 mg/m2 (maximum 18 mg) on day 1. Survival and local relapse-free rates were estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate possible prognostic factors, including the effect of mitomycin C administration. The median survival was 15.4 months (95% confidence interval 12.7-17.2) with 31% 2-year survival (standard error (SE) 3%), and 13% 5-year survival (SE 2%). In the multivariate analysis, lower radiation dose and younger age were the only statistically significant prognostic factors for reduced overall survival and reduced relapse-free rate respectively. There was no difference in survival (chi(2) = 0.07, 1 degree of freedom (df), P=0.79) or local relapse-free rate (chi2 = 0.39, 1 df, P = 0.53) between patients treated with or without mitomycin C. The treatment was well tolerated. Further studies are required to determine the most effective combination of radiation and chemotherapy or other radiation sensitizers for squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus.

The use of chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer

The results of treatment for oesophageal carcinoma remain poor and few patients are curable by surgery alone. The use of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) given as a definitive treatment or in combination with surgery may improve locoregional control and survival, when compared with radiotherapy or surgery alone. Using the keywords "chemoradiotherapy" and "radiochemotherapy", a Medline-based literature review (1980-2001) was performed. Additional literature was obtained from original papers and published meeting abstracts. Two-year survival rates of 28-72% in squamous cell carcinoma and 14-29% in adenocarcinoma from definitive CRT were reported. This is comparable to results achievable by surgery alone. The use of preoperative CRT followed by surgery may further improve survival, but current data are insufficient to justify this approach within routine clinical practice. Acute treatment-related toxicity is increased with CRT. In selected patients with localised unresectable oesophageal cancer, definitive CRT is recommended. There are uncertainties about the role of routine surgery following CRT in patients with resectable disease. For the future, the pretreatment staging of patients needs to be improved and standardised, the optimal CRT regimen needs to be defined and the role of predictive markers for CRT response needs to be developed.

Chemoradiation in conservation therapy for esophageal cancer

Irradiation alone can be highly beneficial for patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer, but external beam irradiation alone is now usually reserved for patients only requiring palliation. Higher cure rates are achieved with irradiation delivered with radiosensitizing chemotherapy based on clinical trials performed over the last decade. Chemoradiation programs based on the modest success with infusional 5-FU, cisplatin, and 50 Gy are justified for either palliative or curative treatment as long as the toxicity is acceptable. One challenge is to increase the incidence of pathologic complete response rates without incurring unacceptable acute toxicity, which is the major dose-limiting factor in current trials. Newer methods that may ameliorate acute injury are different dose schedules for chemoradiation and different methods of dose delivery. Infusional administration of chemotherapy and new dose planning and delivery systems for irradiation (conformal irradiation) are currently under study. Organ preservation for larger numbers of patients may be possible if any of these methods hold up to the early indications of success.

Radiation therapy for loco-regionally recurrent esophageal cancer after surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the treatment outcome of radiation therapy for 33 loco-regionally recurrent esophageal cancer patients.

METHODS

Between 1988 and 1997, 33 patients with loco-regional recurrence of esophageal cancer after curative surgery received radiation therapy at an average total dose of 61 Gy. The site of recurrence was the supraclavicular region in 14 patients, the mediastinal region in 13 patients, and both the supraclavicular and mediastinal regions in six patients. If patients had ether distant metastasis or malignant pleural effusion, they were excluded from analysis. Patients who received prophylactic postoperative irradiation were also excluded from analysis.

RESULTS

The median survival period was 7 months. The survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 33, 15, and 12%, respectively. In univariate analysis, patients with a short time interval between surgery and recurrence (P=0.0098) and patients with recurrence in both the supraclavicular and mediastinal regions (P=0.036) had a worse prognosis. In multivariate analysis, the time interval between surgery and recurrence (P<0.001) and age (worse prognosis in younger patients, P=0.019) were the significant prognostic factors. Complete or partial responses were observed in nine (27%) and 21 (64%) of the patients, respectively. Changes in clinical symptoms, such as dysphagia, chest pain and back pain, could be evaluated in 11 patients, and improvement in symptoms was obtained in eight (73%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of patients who received radiation therapy for postoperative loco-regional recurrence of esophageal cancer is poor. However, there is symptomatic relief in a significant proportion of such patients, and long-term survival is possible in some patients.

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Standard of Care or Elusive Myth?

Although surgical resection as the sole treatment modality for esophageal carcinoma has historically been associated with poor survival rates, improvements have recently been reported using varied neoadjuvant chemo-radiation protocols. This study evaluates the outcome of patients undergoing surgery for esophageal carcinoma at the University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital between July 1991 and June 1996. Seventy-two patients underwent esophageal resection; 51 males and 21 females with a median age of 62.5 years (range = 42–82). Histology was equally distributed between adenocarcinoma (36 patients; 50%) and squamous cell carcinoma (36 patients; 50%). Pathological stage distribution consisted of 6 stage 0 (8%), 10 stage I (14%), 23 stage II (32%), 31 stage III (43%), and 2 stage IV (3%) lesions. Patients were divided into three groups according to the type of preoperative treatment; Group 1 (n = 44); surgery alone; Group 2 (n = 18); neoadjuvant 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy, and Group 3 (n = 9); neoadjuvant 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy in conjunction with external beam radiation (XRT). One patient received preoperative XRT alone. All survivors were followed for a minimum of 1 year and statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank, and chi-square tests. In the 28 patients receiving any form of neoadjuvant therapy only one patient had a pathological complete response (CR) (3.5%). The overall 5 year and median survival rates were 18 per cent and 20.5 months (range = 0–73), respectively. Individual treatment group survival rates at 5 years were 28% for Group 1; 21% for Group 2; and 0% for Group 3, showing no survival difference between Groups 1 and 2; Group 3 fared significantly worse than the other two, probably as a result of the high operative mortality in this group. These results indicate that surgical resection continues to be an important treatment modality for esophageal carcinoma. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in our experience failed to improve these survival rates and pre-operative chemoradiation was associated with a high perioperative mortality rate. Chemotherapy regimens with higher CRs may further improve these survival rates.

Combined modality therapy for esophageal cancer

Whereas many patients with esophageal carcinoma present with what appears to be localized disease, cure rates with surgical resection alone remain low. Although surgical resection, where feasible, affords patients the best chance of cure, the primary tumor has often invaded local tissues or structures, and occult micrometastases often exist at the time of presentation. In an effort to improve treatment results, various combinations of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy have been used. The results of combined modality therapy are reviewed in this article. The importance of accurate pretreatment staging is discussed, and ongoing prospective randomized trials are reviewed.

Gastrointestinal tract cancer in the elderly

Gastrointestinal cancers are common in the elderly. In the 1990s, modest advances in the early diagnosis, staging, and treatment of gastrointestinal cancers were made. Emphasis has been placed on screening for colorectal cancer; development of new diagnostic and staging modalities, particularly endoscopic ultrasound; and introduction of new treatment regimens, such as chemoradiation programs for esophageal, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers as well as endoscopic mucosal resection of early gastrointestinal cancers. New palliative techniques, such as laser and photodynamic therapy and placement of enteral stents, are being used increasingly in patients who have advanced cancer and are not surgical candidates. In the past, attitudes toward the elderly affected the management of cancer. Age should not be the only parameter considered when addressing the treatment of a gastrointestinal malignancy. Management decisions in the elderly should follow the same principles as those in younger patients. A thorough medical evaluation in the elderly is necessary to evaluate the patient's risk and to optimize surgical, chemotherapeutic, and palliative outcomes.

Preoperative hyperfractionated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy in resectable esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the local control rates, survival rates, and patterns of failure for esophageal cancer patients receiving preoperative concurrent chemotherapy and hyperfractionated radiotherapy followed by esophagectomy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From May 1993 through January 1997, 94 patients with resectable esophageal cancers received continuous hyperfractionated radiation (4,800 cGy/40 fx/4 weeks), with concurrent FP chemotherapy (5-FU 1 g/m(2)/day, days 2-6, 30-34, CDDP 60 mg/m(2)/day, days 1, 29) followed by esophagectomy 3-4 weeks later. If there was evidence of disease progression on preoperative re-evaluation work-up, or if the patient refused surgery, definitive chemoradiotherapy was delivered. Minimum follow-up time was 2 years. RESULTS; All patients successfully completed preoperative treatment and were then followed until death. Fifty-three patients received surgical resection, and another 30 were treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Eleven patients did not receive further treatment. Among 91 patients who received clinical reevaluation, we observed 35 having clinical complete response (CR) (38.5%). Pathologic CR rate was 49% (26 patients). Overall survival rate was 59.8% at 2 years and 40.3% at 5 years. Median survival time was 32 months. In 83 patients who were treated with surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy, the esophagectomy group showed significantly higher survival, disease-free survival, and local disease-free survival rates than those in the definitive chemoradiation group.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy in this trial showed improved clinical and pathologic tumor response and survival when compared to historical results. Patients who underwent esophagectomy following chemoradiation showed decreased local recurrence and improved survival and disease-free survival rates compared to the definitive chemoradiation group.

Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal cancer carries a poor prognosis. The 5-year survival rate following resection ranges from 10 to 35 per cent. Recent evidence suggests that the addition of non-surgical treatments to surgery may improve resection rates, reduce the risk of recurrence and improve survival. This review examines the role of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in oesophageal cancer.

METHODS

A Medline-based literature review (1980-2000) was performed using the key words 'neoadjuvant or preoperative' and 'chemoradiotherapy or radiochemotherapy'. Additional literature was obtained from original papers and published meeting abstracts.

RESULTS

Forty-six non-randomized and six randomized trials of preoperative CRT were found. Resection rates, pathological complete response (pCR), treatment-related mortality rates and relapse patterns are documented. Improved 5-year survival rates approaching 60 per cent may be achieved following pCR. Three of the six randomized trials show a benefit in either overall survival or disease-free survival compared with surgery alone. Treatment-related toxicity can be significant.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CRT may improve survival. Emerging evidence suggests that CRT alone can achieve similar survival rates to surgery alone. New imaging modalities may help to select which patients require surgery. Larger randomized trials of preoperative CRT or chemotherapy are needed to define optimal regimens and produce higher pCR rates with acceptable toxicity.

Impact on survival of surgery after concomitant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cancers of the esophagus

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the results of chemoradiotherapy with or without surgery in locally-advanced esophageal carcinomas (T3 and/or nodal involvement).

METHODS

One hundred twelve patients with locally-advanced carcinoma of the esophagus without histologically proven invasion of the tracheobronchial tree or distant visceral metastases were treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by re-evaluation; surgery was performed or chemoradiotherapy continued, based on tumor regression and the patient's general status. Chemoradiotherapy consisted of concomitant 5-fluorouracil (5FU)(1 g/m(2) day 1-3), cisplatinum (50 mg/m(2) day 1 and 2), and external beam irradiation up to a dose of 40 or 43.2 Gy. After a 4-week rest period, radical esophagectomy or a new cycle of chemoradiotherapy (up to a total dose of 65 Gy) was performed.

RESULTS

A complete clinical response was obtained in 25.7% of the patients and a partial response in 45.9%. Fifty patients underwent surgery, but only 38 patients had an esophagectomy. Post-esophagectomy mortality was 5.3%. A complete histologic response rate of 23.7% was obtained. Two- and 5-year survival rates were, respectively, 41.5% and 28.6% for the whole population. According to multivariate analysis, prognostic factors for survival were Karnofsky index, esophagectomy, and response to chemoradiotherapy. Five-year survival for patients who experienced a partial response to radiation and chemotherapy was 49.1% for those who had surgery and 23.5% for those treated without surgery (p = 0.003). There was no obvious benefit for the small number of patients treated surgically after complete response to radiation and chemotherapy. Toxicity, essentially hematologic, was moderate.

CONCLUSION

For locally-advanced esophageal carcinomas, esophagectomy, after concomitant chemoradiotherapy, could improve the survival rate, especially for patients who responded partially to the latter.

Analysis of the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive carcinoma of the esophagus

The purpose of this report is to analyze the role and optimum integration of chemotherapy for invasive carcinoma of the esophagus in the combined modality setting. The charts of 157 patients with primary invasive nonmetastatic carcinoma of the esophagus treated with curative intent between 1984 and 1998 were reviewed. Various combinations of chemotherapy (C), radiotherapy (R), and surgery (S) were used. Chemotherapy was multiagent (typically 5-fluorouracil [5-FU]/cisplatin/hydroxyurea, 5-FU/cisplatin/leucovorin, or docetaxel/cisplatin) for all but seven patients treated with single agents. The clinical endpoints examined were overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS). Multivariate analyses and pairwise comparisons were made for determination of the benefit of chemotherapy. On the multivariate analyses, only American Joint Committee on Cancer stage and chemotherapy were statistically significant determinants of both OS and CSS. Following are the results of the pairwise analyses: 3-year OS: (no C) versus (any C): 16% versus 27% (p = 0.02); (S) versus (C+S): 19% versus 34% (p = 0.35); (R) versus (C+R): 0% versus 13% (p = 0.05); (R + S) versus (C + R + S): 18% versus 33% (p = 0.03). The administration of adjuvant chemotherapy can improve survival in patients with invasive nonmetastatic esophageal carcinoma. This benefit appears to be greater when chemotherapy is given with radiotherapy (with or without surgery) than in the absence of radiotherapy, perhaps because of a radiosensitizing effect not possible when using surgery is the only local control modality.

A prospective trial of short-course radiotherapy plus chemotherapy for palliation of dysphagia from advanced esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

Between 1994 and 1997, 22 patients with dysphagia from advanced incurable esophageal cancer were enrolled in a phase I/II prospective study to assess the palliative benefit and toxicity of a short course of radiotherapy with chemotherapy.

METHODS

The study population included 17 men and five women with a median age of 69 (range 43-84). Patients were treated with 30 Gy in ten fractions to the mediastinum with a concurrent single course of chemotherapy (5-FU, 1000 mg/m(2), days 1-4 and mitomycin-C 10 mg/m(2), day 1). Swallowing ability was recorded each day on a self-administered diary card using the five point dysphagia index of the MRC (UK). The median baseline MRC swallowing score was 4 (cannot swallow solids).

RESULTS

Treatment was generally well tolerated, but seven (32%) patients had transient worsening of dysphagia scores immediately following treatment because of esophagitis; fifteen (68%) achieved a complete response (score 1: no difficulty on swallowing) with a median time to normalization of swallowing of 5 weeks. For these patients, the median dysphagia-free interval from time of onset of improvement was 11 weeks (range 1-131 weeks) and 11 (73%) remained dysphagia-free until death. The remaining patients had no or marginal improvement. Univariate analysis showed no difference between responders and non-responders with respect to age, gender, or histology. Median survival for the entire study population was 20 weeks (range 3-135 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective trial shows that a short course of radiotherapy plus chemotherapy may produce complete relief of swallowing difficulties in a substantial proportion of patients with acceptable toxicity.

The role of brachytherapy for palliation

The goal of palliative radiation is to alleviate symptoms in a short amount of time and maintain an optimal functional and quality-of-life level while minimizing toxicity and patient inconvenience. Despite advances in multimodality antineoplastic therapies, failure to control the tumor at its primary site frustratingly remains the predominant source of morbidity and mortality in many patients with cancer. Escalation of doses of radiation using external beam irradiation has been shown to improve local tumor control, but limits are imposed by the tolerance of normal surrounding structures. The highly conformal nature of brachytherapy enables the radiation oncologist to accomplish safe escalation of radiation doses to the tumor while minimizing doses to normal surrounding structures. Thus, by enhancing the potential for local control, brachytherapy used alone or as a supplement to external beam radiation therapy retains a significant and important role in achieving the goals of palliation. Proper patient selection, excellent technique, and adherence to implant rules will minimize the risk of complications. The advantages realized with the use of brachytherapy include good patient tolerance, short treatment time, and high rates of sustained palliation. This article reviews various aspects of palliative brachytherapy, including patient selection criteria, implant techniques, treatment planning, dose and fractionation schedules, results, and complications of treatment. Tumors of the head and neck, trachea and bronchi, esophagus, biliary tract, and brain, all in which local failure represents the predominant cause of morbidity and mortality, are highlighted.

Radiation treatment for cervical esophagus: patterns of practice study in Canada, 1996

PURPOSE

To assess the patterns of practice among Canadian radiation oncologists who treat esophageal cancers, using a trans-Canada survey, completed at the end of 1996.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One of 3 case presentations of different stages of cervical esophageal cancer was randomly assigned and sent to participating radiation oncologists by mail. Respondents were asked to fill in questionnaires regarding treatment techniques and to outline target volumes for the boost phase of radiotherapy. Radiation oncologists from 26 of 27 (96%) of all Canadian centers participated.

RESULTS

High-energy X-rays (>/= 10 MV) were employed by 68% of the respondents in part of the treatment course. The majority (83%) of the radiation oncologists used at least two phases of treatment. Very few, 10 of 59 (17%), responses started with multifield treatment. The most frequently used prescription dose was 60 Gy/30 fractions/6 weeks, given with concurrent chemotherapy. Dose prescriptions were to the isocenter in 39 of 48 (81%) or to a particular isodose line in 9 of 48 (19%) of respondents.

CONCLUSION

There was a variety of radiation treatment techniques in this trans-Canada survey. The majority of the patients had combined cisplatin-based chemoradiation. The isocenter was not used consistently as a dose prescription point.

Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemotherapy and high-dose radiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the upper-thoracic and midthoracic esophagus

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of an induction chemotherapy schedule followed by high-dose radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the upper and midthoracic esophagus. Patients were treated with three courses of fluorouracil, leucovorin, etoposide, and cisplatin-containing induction chemotherapy followed by high-dose external beam radiotherapy to 65 Gy in 6 weeks for T4 and obstructing T3 tumors. Transversable T3 tumors received 60 Gy in 6 weeks by external radiotherapy, followed by two high-dose-rate esophageal brachytherapy fractions of 4 Gy in 5-mm tissue depth. Concurrent to radiotherapy, cisplatin and etoposide were given. Long-term survival of 22 patients was 41% and 31% at 2 and 3 years, respectively, with a median follow-up of 39 months. The probability of locoregional tumor recurrence was 60% at 3 years for all patients and 30% for those with a partial or complete response to induction chemotherapy. Acute toxicity of this schedule was moderate. Long-term survivors had a good swallowing function. This schedule offers a considerable chance of long-term survival for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the upper and midthoracic esophagus. Local in-field recurrences are the main risk after definitive radiochemotherapy. Dose escalation of radiotherapy is possible because of the observed low late toxicity.

Treatment of superficial esophageal cancer by external radiation therapy alone: results of a multi-institutional experience

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness and toxicity of external radiation therapy for superficial esophageal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

During the period from March 1979 to November 1996, 78 patients with superficial esophageal cancer received radiation therapy without intracavitary irradiation at nine radiotherapy institutions in Japan. All patients had histologically-proven squamous cell carcinoma. Endoscopic ultrasonography was performed in 34 patients to discriminate mucosal from submucosal cancer. Most of the patients had received radiation therapy using conventional fractionation at an average dose of 65.5 Gy.

RESULTS

The survival rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were 88%, 73%, and 45%, respectively. The local control rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were 85%, 79%, and 66%, respectively. Although the difference was not significant, the survival rate of cancer patients with a tumor invading the submucosa was lower than that of the other patients. In 6 mucosal cancer patients, local recurrence was observed in 1 patient with extensive cancer. Regional lymph node recurrence and distant failure were not observed in mucosal cancer patients, while in 28 submucosal cancer patients, the 5-year survival rate and relapse free rate were only 49% and 43%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis identified age as the only significant prognostic factor. Severe late injury, such as esophageal ulcer, perforation, and bleeding, was not observed.

CONCLUSION

External radiation therapy is effective for mucosal cancer. However, further investigation is needed to establish a better standard treatment protocol for submucosal cancer.

[Non-surgical treatments of esophageal cancers]

INTRODUCTION

Despite improvements in surgical techniques and perioperative mortality, only slight improvements in the 5-year survival of patients with esophageal cancer have been observed in the last 20 years. Many patients with apparently localized cancer will have recurrences or metastatic disease despite surgery with curative resection. Consequently, multimodal therapies, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy, were introduced. This review outlines and critically analyzes current non-surgical treatments, including palliative care.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

Esophageal cancers appear to be chemosensitive but the median duration of response is short and toxicity consistent, especially in metastatic disease. Consequently, palliative chemotherapy should be offered preferably within a clinical trial. Chemotherapy as the only adjuvant treatment cannot be recommended outside clinical trials. Radiotherapy alone as a curative treatment has been proven to be inferior to chemoradiotherapy in inoperable tumors. Some data support the use of preoperative chemoradiotherapy, but randomized trials are conflicting. A pathological complete response has been identified as a favorable prognostic factor for survival. Self-expanding esophageal metal stents are a simple and effective palliative treatment of malignant dysphagia and can be considered as the reference treatment in patients with obstruction of the lower esophagus or with fistula.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

Taxanes should be evaluated in randomized studies using chemotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy. Progress in radiotherapy, such as accelerated fractionation, greater radiation dose, and the addition of brachytherapy, will increase locoregional control and probably survival. The role of secondary surgery in patients responding to chemoradiotherapy still needs to be answered.