MR-based artificial intelligence model to assess response to therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Biological Image-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy

MRI-guided radiotherapy systems have the potential to bring two important concepts in modern radiotherapy together: adaptive radiotherapy and biological targeting. Based on frequent anatomical and functional imaging, monitoring the changes that occur in volume, shape as well as biological characteristics, a treatment plan can be updated regularly to accommodate the observed treatment response. For this purpose, quantitative imaging biomarkers need to be identified that show changes early during treatment and predict treatment outcome. This review provides an overview of the current evidence on quantitative MRI measurements during radiotherapy and their potential as an imaging biomarker on MRI-guided radiotherapy systems.

Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal cancer: Recent advances and future perspectives

Artificial intelligence (AI) using machine or deep learning algorithms is attracting increasing attention because of its more accurate image recognition ability and prediction performance than human-aid analyses. The application of AI models to gastrointestinal (GI) clinical oncology has been investigated for the past decade. AI has the capacity to automatically detect and diagnose GI tumors with similar diagnostic accuracy to expert clinicians. AI may also predict malignant potential, such as tumor histology, metastasis, patient survival, resistance to cancer treatments and the molecular biology of tumors, through image analyses of radiological or pathological imaging data using complex deep learning models beyond human cognition. The introduction of AI-assisted diagnostic systems into clinical settings is expected in the near future. However, limitations associated with the evaluation of GI tumors by AI models have yet to be resolved. Recent studies on AI-assisted diagnostic models of gastric and colorectal cancers in the endoscopic, pathological, and radiological fields were herein reviewed. The limitations and future perspectives for the application of AI systems in clinical settings have also been discussed. With the establishment of a multidisciplinary team containing AI experts in each medical institution and prospective studies, AI-assisted medical systems will become a promising tool for GI cancer.

Radiomics for the Prediction of Treatment Outcome and Survival in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Prediction of outcome in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is challenging as a result of lack of a robust biomarker and heterogeneity between and within tumors. The aim of this review was to assess the current possibilities and limitations of radiomics (on computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], and positron emission tomography [PET]) for the prediction of treatment outcome and long-term outcome in CRC. Medline/PubMed was searched up to August 2020 for studies that used radiomics for the prediction of response to treatment and survival in patients with CRC (based on pretreatment imaging). The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool and Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) were used for quality assessment. A total of 76 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for further analysis. Radiomics analyses were performed on MRI in 41 studies, on CT in 30 studies, and on ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in 10 studies. Heterogeneous results were reported regarding radiomics methods and included features. High-quality studies (n = 13), consisting mainly of MRI-based radiomics to predict response in rectal cancer, were able to predict response with good performance. Radiomics literature in CRC is highly heterogeneous, but it nonetheless holds promise for the prediction of outcome. The most evidence is available for MRI-based radiomics in rectal cancer. Future radiomics research in CRC should focus on independent validation of existing models rather than on developing new models.

The emerging role of super enhancer-derived noncoding RNAs in human cancer

Super enhancers (SEs) are large clusters of adjacent enhancers that drive the expression of genes which regulate cellular identity; SE regions can be enriched with a high density of transcription factors, co-factors, and enhancer-associated epigenetic modifications. Through enhanced activation of their target genes, SEs play an important role in various diseases and conditions, including cancer. Recent studies have shown that SEs not only activate the transcriptional expression of coding genes to directly regulate biological functions, but also drive the transcriptional expression of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) to indirectly regulate biological functions. SE-derived ncRNAs play critical roles in tumorigenesis, including malignant proliferation, metastasis, drug resistance, and inflammatory response. Moreover, the abnormal expression of SE-derived ncRNAs is closely related to the clinical and pathological characterization of tumors. In this review, we summarize the functions and roles of SE-derived ncRNAs in tumorigenesis and discuss their prospective applications in tumor therapy. A deeper understanding of the potential mechanism underlying the action of SE-derived ncRNAs in tumorigenesis may provide new strategies for the early diagnosis of tumors and targeted therapy.

MRI radiomics-based machine-learning classification of bone chondrosarcoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of machine learning for discrimination between low-grade and high-grade cartilaginous bone tumors based on radiomic parameters extracted from unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 58 patients with histologically-proven low-grade/atypical cartilaginous tumor of the appendicular skeleton (n = 26) or higher-grade chondrosarcoma (n = 32, including 16 appendicular and 16 axial lesions). They were randomly divided into training (n = 42) and test (n = 16) groups for model tuning and testing, respectively. All tumors were manually segmented on T1-weighted and T2-weighted images by drawing bidimensional regions of interest, which were used for first order and texture feature extraction. A Random Forest wrapper was employed for feature selection. The resulting dataset was used to train a locally weighted ensemble classifier (AdaboostM1). Its performance was assessed via 10-fold cross-validation on the training data and then on the previously unseen test set. Thereafter, an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist blinded to histological and radiomic data qualitatively evaluated the cartilaginous tumors in the test group.

RESULTS

After feature selection, the dataset was reduced to 4 features extracted from T1-weighted images. AdaboostM1 correctly classified 85.7 % and 75 % of the lesions in the training and test groups, respectively. The corresponding areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.85 and 0.78. The radiologist correctly graded 81.3 % of the lesions. There was no significant difference in performance between the radiologist and machine learning classifier (P = 0.453).

CONCLUSIONS

Our machine learning approach showed good diagnostic performance for classification of low-to-high grade cartilaginous bone tumors and could prove a valuable aid in preoperative tumor characterization.

The feasibility of differentiating colorectal cancer from normal and inflammatory thickening colon wall using CT texture analysis

To investigate the diagnostic value of texture analysis (TA) for differentiating between colorectal cancer (CRC), colonic lesions caused by inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and normal thickened colon wall (NTC) on computed tomography (CT) and assess which scanning phase has the highest differential diagnostic value. In all, 107 patients with CRC, 113 IBD patients with colonic lesions, and 96 participants with NTC were retrospectively enrolled. All subjects underwent multiphase CT examination, including pre-contrast phase (PCP), arterial phase (AP), and portal venous phase (PVP) scans. Based on these images, classification by TA and visual classification by radiologists were performed to discriminate among the three tissue types. The performance of TA and visual classification was compared. Precise TA classification results (error, 2.03–12.48%) were acquired by nonlinear discriminant analysis for CRC, IBD and NTC, regardless of phase or feature selection. PVP images showed a better ability to discriminate the three tissues by comprising the three scanning phases. TA showed significantly better performance in discriminating CRC, IBD and NTC than visual classification for residents, but there was no significant difference in classification between TA and experienced radiologists. TA could provide useful quantitative information for the differentiation of CRC, IBD and NTC on CT, particularly in PVP images.