Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease

Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome Risk Comparison between Transcarotid Artery Revascularization and Carotid Artery Stenting with Distal Embolic Protection

BACKGROUND

Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is a rare but serious complication after carotid artery revascularization. This study aims to determine the impact of carotid artery stenting (CAS) modality on the incidence, severity, and overall outcomes of CHS after carotid revascularization.

METHODS

Data from patients who underwent CAS with either distal embolic protection (CAS + DEP) or transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) were obtained from the Vascular Quality Initiative database through the years 2016-2023. Cases without embolic protection device and patients suffering from carotid dissection, trauma, or fibromuscular dysplasia were excluded from the study. Patients were stratified into asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis groups and then further reviewed based on the urgency of their revascularization. The primary outcome was the occurrence of CHS after revascularization. A subgroup analysis was then performed, evaluating postprocedural outcomes and severity of CHS. Lastly, patients with CHS were further analyzed according to the severity of their stroke on admission using the Modified Rankin Scale.

RESULTS

In this analysis, a total of 69,480 (57.47% TCAR; 42.53% CAS + DEP) patients were included. Postprocedural CHS was lower in the TCAR cohort compared to the CAS + DEP cohort (0.53% vs. 1.1%, P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, TCAR was associated with lower risk of CHS than CAS + DEP (P < 0.001). When considering only asymptomatic patients, revascularization modality did not significantly affect CHS occurrence (P = 0.610). However, in symptomatic patients, TCAR was associated with 2-fold lower risk of CHS (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40-0.68, P < 0.001), in both elective (P = 0.003), and urgent/emergency cases (P < 0.001). Among patients who developed CHS, those undergoing TCAR had decreased in-hospital mortality (aOR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.27-0.94, P = 0.031) and at 30 days (aOR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.26-0.80, P = 0.006). TCAR patients with CHS also had a shorter length of hospitalization (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36-0.92, P = 0.022) and suffered less frequently from severe CHS with seizures and intracranial hemorrhage (aOR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29-0.89, P = 0.019). Patients undergoing CAS + DEP who were admitted with severe stroke (Modified Rankin Scale 3-5) developed severe CHS (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

In patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, TCAR is associated with a lower risk of CHS compared to CAS + DEP. Among those who develop CHS, patients who undergo TCAR express a milder form of CHS and have lower in-hospital and 30-day mortality than those treated with CAS + DEP.

Lipidomic Expression Analysis in Carotid Atherosclerotic Disease: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Lipids are key molecules for atherosclerosis, with tight regulation mechanisms, making them potential biomarkers for disease-specific diagnostics and therapeutics. Therefore, we aim to perform a systematic literature review on lipidomic analysis in serum/plasma and plaque samples of patients with carotid atherosclerosis.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines on the lipidomic profile in serum/plasma and carotid artery plaques from patients with significant carotid disease by degree of stenosis in preoperative imaging and clinical presentation (symptomatic, asymptomatic, and radiation-induced carotid disease). Main outcome was the differential lipidomic expression of serum/plasma, and plaque lipids of patients with carotid artery atherosclerosis. Studies were screened using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to determine the quality of the design and content of the selected manuscripts.

RESULTS

We included fourteen studies, from which ten included plaque analysis. The lipidomic analysis revealed that sterols and hydroxycholesterols were consistently found in both blood and plaque across studies. Triacylglycerols were present in both sample types, with specific forms linked to radiation-induced carotid artery disease. Symptomatic patients exhibited esterified hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids and arachidonic acid precursors exclusively in plaque with an inflammatory profile of the disease. In contrast, docosahexaenoic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid were associated with plaque stability. Diabetics showed nonesterified fatty acids and specific phospholipids only in plaque, indicating localized lipid changes. Other pathways relevant to disease progression include the sphingolipids and ceramide pathways with inflammatory profiling.

CONCLUSION

Lipidomic provides an innovative approach to stratify carotid atherosclerotic disease. Integrating lipidomic data with other -omics approaches may further enhance our understanding of disease mechanisms and aid in the development of precision medicine approaches, specifically in those patients at risk for early carotid atherosclerotic disease.

Ischemia targeted coronary revascularization improves 5-year survival following carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVES

Long-term survival after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is limited by adverse cardiac events with 5% annual mortality. We sought to determine whether diagnosis of silent coronary ischemia together with elective ischemia-targeted coronary revascularization can reduce death and myocardial infarction (MI) and improve long-term survival of patients after CEA.

METHODS

Observational cohort study of patients with no cardiac history or coronary symptoms undergoing elective CEA. Patients enrolled in a prospective study of preoperative cardiac evaluation using coronary computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) to detect silent (asymptomatic) coronary ischemia together with elective postoperative ischemia-targeted coronary revascularization were compared with matched controls with standard preoperative cardiac evaluation and no elective coronary revascularization. Lesion-specific coronary ischemia was defined as an FFRCT of ≤0.80 distal to >30% stenosis with severe ischemia defined as an FFRCT of ≤0.75. End points included all-cause death, cardiac death, MI, stroke, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (defined as cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke) during 5 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

FFRCT (n = 100) and control (n = 100) cohorts were well-matched with no significant differences in age, gender, comorbidities, or indications for CEA. Asymptomatic lesion-specific coronary ischemia (FFRCT of ≤0.80) was present in 57% of FFRCT patients, with severe ischemia in 44% and left main ischemia in 7%; 43% had no coronary ischemia (FFRCT of >0.80). The status of coronary ischemia was unknown in the controls. CEA was performed successfully in both cohorts with no deaths or neurological events, and all patients received optimal postoperative medical therapy. Elective ischemia-targeted coronary revascularization was performed in 33% of FFRCT patients within 3 months of CEA. Controls had no elective coronary revascularization. During 5 years of follow-up, compared with controls, the FFRCT group had fewer all-cause deaths (11% vs 24%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.77; P = .016); fewer cardiac deaths (3% vs 13%; HR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03-0.69; P = .009); fewer MIs (3% vs 21%; HR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.02-0.31; P < .001), and fewer MACEs (10% vs 33%; HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.10-0.44; P < .001) with no differences in stroke. There were no cardiac deaths or MIs among patients with no coronary ischemia (FFRCT of >0.80). Annual mortality in FFRCT was 2.2% per year compared with 4.8% per year in controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis of silent coronary ischemia together with elective ischemia-targeted coronary revascularization after CEA decrease the 5-year risk of all-cause death, cardiac death, MI, and MACE by >50% and improved survival (89%) compared with patients receiving standard cardiac evaluation and care (76%).

The Impact of Elevated Lipoprotein (a) Levels on Postoperative Outcomes in Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review

Background/Objectives: Numerous studies have highlighted lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) as a significant, independent risk factor for the development and progression of cardiovascular diseases, including carotid artery disease, which is strongly correlated with an elevated risk of ischemic events and stroke. This systematic review aims to determine the impact of elevated Lp(a) levels on the postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Methods: Four electronic databases-PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library-were employed to search for studies assessing the association between elevated Lp(a) levels and the postoperative outcomes following CEA. The effect of elevated Lp(a) levels was systematically reviewed, and the outcomes reported in each study were evaluated. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Study Quality Assessment Tool for observational cohorts and cross-sectional studies. Results: A total of five observational studies were included, with 1450 patients. The mean age of the participants in the studies ranged from 57 to 74 years, and the percentage of males ranged from 37.22% to 68.96%. One study showed that elevated Lp(a) levels were significantly associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) after CEA, particularly periprocedural stroke, with another manuscript suggesting a long-term predictive value for acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) within 24 months following surgery. There was no association in the included studies with carotid plaque instability, inflammation biomarkers, or restenosis. Conclusions: This systematic review suggests an association of Lp(a) levels with MACEs and ACSs after CEA although no association with restenosis and carotid plaque inflammation and/or instability.

Quantitative correlation between carotid or lower limb atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease: a retrospective observational study

Background

Early diagnosis and intervention are key for the treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD). Ultrasound is used to assess risk stratification in patients with coronary artery disease. However, few studies quantify the relationship between carotid or lower limb atherosclerosis and coronary revascularization. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the semi-quantitative degree of atherosclerosis in the neck or lower extremity vessels can predict the need for coronary revascularization, thereby establishing a predictive model for coronary revascularization based on peripheral vascular disease.

Methods

Patients who underwent coronary angiography and peripheral vascular ultrasound were randomly selected for semi-quantitative analysis of the degree of coronary artery and peripheral vascular stenosis. Data from 306 patients were collected.

Results

The semiquantitative score, grade score and lower limb score from vascular ultrasound were positively correlated with the Gensini score of coronary artery lesions. The semi-quantitative score (score = 2) predicted the sensitivity and specificity for coronary revascularization at 83.74% and 61.72%, respectively. The graded score (score = 2) predicted the sensitivity and specificity for coronary revascularization at 77.24% and 72.13%, respectively. The lower extremity score (score = 3) predicted the sensitivity and specificity for coronary revascularization at 90.24% and 54.55%, respectively.

Conclusions

Carotid semiquantitative scores, grade scores, and lower limb scores are predictive factors for the need for coronary revascularization and can serve as auxiliary examinations for the early diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Higher long-term mortality in patients with positive preoperative stress test undergoing elective carotid revascularization with carotid endarterectomy compared to transfemoral carotid artery stenting or transcarotid revascularization

OBJECTIVE

This study compared outcomes in patients with and without preoperative stress testing undergoing carotid revascularization including carotid endarterectomy (CEA), transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TF-CAS), and transcarotid revascularization (TCAR).

METHODS

Patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network database who underwent elective carotid revascularization from 2016 to 2020 were included. Patients were analyzed by group based on whether they underwent cardiac stress testing within 2 years preceding revascularization without subsequent coronary intervention. Subset analysis was performed comparing outcomes between those with negative and positive results (evidence of ischemia or myocardial infarction [MI]). Outcomes of interest were postoperative MI/neurological events, 90-day readmission rates, and long-term mortality.

RESULTS

We analyzed 18,364 patients (78.8% CEA, 9.3% TF-CAS, and 11.9% TCAR). Of these, 35.8% underwent preoperative stress testing (37.4% of CEA patients, 27.5% of TF-CAS patients, and 31.9% of TCAR patients). Although comorbidities were significantly higher among patients undergoing CEA with a preoperative stress test compared with those without stress testing, the overall prevalence of comorbidities was higher among patients undergoing TF-CAS or TCAR, irrespective of preoperative stress test status. Compared with patients with a negative stress test, patients with a positive stress test undergoing any form of carotid revascularization had a significant increase in 90-day readmission rates (CEA 19.6% vs 15.8% [P = .003]; CAS 33.3% vs 18.6% [P < .001]; TCAR 25% vs 17.5% [P = .04]). No group demonstrated a difference in the incidence of in-hospital postoperative neurological events or congestive heart failure, but those undergoing CEA (but not CAS or TCAR) experienced a significant increase in-hospital postoperative MI (1.7% vs 0.6%; P < .001). In 3-year follow-up, those with a positive compared with negative stress test were more likely to undergo coronary artery bypass graft/percutaneous coronary intervention in the CEA (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.87 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.42-2.27]; P < .0001) and CAS groups (adjusted HR, 3.89 [95% CI, 1.77-8.57]; P < .01), but not the TCAR cohort. Notably, those undergoing CEA with a positive compared with negative stress test, but not CAS or TCAR, exhibited a 28% increase in mortality (adjusted HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.03-1.58]; P = .03) at 3 years. Conversely, those patients with a negative stress test compared with no stress test undergoing CEA experienced a 14% decrease in mortality at 3 years (adjusted HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.76-0.98]; P = .02); this mortality difference was not observed in similar stress test cohorts undergoing TF-CAS or TCAR.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights that a positive stress test in appropriately selected, asymptomatic patients undergoing elective carotid revascularization can predict select perioperative and long-term cardiovascular outcomes. However, given the high follow-up mortality associated with those undergoing CEA for elective carotid revascularization, our findings call into question whether these patients should be offered optimal medical management and/or stenting preferentially.

Periprocedural and Long-Term Outcomes of Carotid Stent Placement in Patients with Very Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis versus Carotid Near Occlusion with Full Collapse: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the periprocedural and 5-year outcomes between patients with very severe stenosis (80%-99% stenosis) and those with carotid near occlusion (CNO) with full collapse.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from patients with very severe stenosis and CNO with full collapse who underwent carotid artery stent (CAS) placement at a single center were retrospectively analyzed from January 2018 to December 2021. Unmatched and propensity score-matched (PSM) comparisons of periprocedural adverse events and 5-year follow-up rates for in-stent restenosis, ipsilateral ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and mortality were conducted between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

A total of 555 patients (481 patients in the very severe stenosis group and 74 in the CNO with full collapse group) were included. PSM resulted in 61 patients from the CNO group being matched with 183 from the severe stenosis control group. The periprocedural adverse events did not differ significantly between the 2 groups after PSM. The 5-year follow-up results demonstrated no significant differences in outcomes between the 2 groups. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the 5-year rate of freedom from stroke was 89% (CNO group) versus 92% (control group; P = .500). The 5-year rate of freedom from in-stent restenosis was 89% (CNO group) versus 91% (control group; P = .630), while that from death, myocardial infarction, and stroke incidence was 84% (CNO group) versus 87% (control group; P = .430).

CONCLUSIONS

CNO with full collapse showed long-term outcomes comparable with those of very severe carotid stenosis following CAS placement.

FGF-23 as a Biomarker for Carotid Plaque Vulnerability: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Carotid artery disease is a condition affecting 3% of the general population which significantly contributes to the development of cerebrovascular events. Fibroblast Growth Factor-23 (FGF-23) is a hormone that has been linked to atherosclerosis and increased cardiovascular risk, including stroke and myocardial infarction. This review explores the association of FGF-23 with carotid artery disease progression in an endarterectomy clinical context.

METHODS

Based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), a search was performed relying on MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science, identifying publications focused on the correlation between serum FGF-23 and carotid artery disease. Assessment of study quality was made using National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Study Quality Assessment Tool (NHLBI).

RESULTS

Three observational studies, comprising 1039 participants, were included. There was considerable heterogeneity among the populations from the different studies. Elevated FGF-23 levels were consistently associated with unstable plaque features, including intraplaque neovascularization, as identified through Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI). Plasma levels of inflammatory mediators, such as Interleukin-6 (Il-6), Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 (MCP-1), and Osteoprotegerin (OPG), positively correlated with carotid artery disease, but their link to unstable plaques is conflicting. None of the studies investigated clinical complications following carotid endarterectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

FGF-23 is a potential biomarker for plaque vulnerability in carotid disease. Despite promising findings, limitations such as small sample sizes and lack of longitudinal data suggest the need for larger and more diverse studies to improve risk stratification and inform personalized treatment strategies for carotid atherosclerosis.

The diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative near-infrared spectroscopy in carotid artery endarterectomy under general anesthesia: A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) carries a risk of perioperative stroke, particularly during carotid cross-clamping. While neurological monitoring is reliable for patients under regional anesthesia, alternative options are needed for those unsuitable for regional anesthesia. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is commonly used during CEA, but its diagnostic accuracy varies, particularly under general anesthesia.

METHODS

A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative NIRS in detecting clamp-associated hemodynamic cerebral ischemia in patients under general anesthesia. MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were searched for studies that compared NIRS with the occurrence of immediate or early postoperative neurological deficits in patients undergoing CEA under GA. Meta-regression was performed to explore causes of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 28 studies involving 5729 patients were included. The results show that NIRS has a summary sensitivity of 47.5% and a summary specificity of 90.3% in diagnosing clamp-associated cerebral ischemia under general anesthesia, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.85. The presence of a contralateral carotid occlusion (CCO) increased summary sensitivity while smoking history the presence of CCO and smoking history decreased summary specificity. For postoperative stroke prediction, NIRS has a summary sensitivity of 49.5% and summary specificity of 88.5%, with an AUC-ROC of 0.85.

CONCLUSIONS

NIRS is a specific but not highly sensitive tool for detecting cerebral ischemia during CEA, and its use in combination with more sensitive neuromonitoring methods is recommended, in order to guide intraoperative neuroprotective strategies.

Editor's Choice - Stroke and Death Following Carotid Endarterectomy or Carotid Artery Stenting: A Ten Year Nationwide Study in France

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective, nationwide cohort study aimed to compare peri-procedural stroke or death within 30 days of the procedure (PPSD30) in patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid stenting (CAS).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used data from the French hospital database PMSI. All patients who underwent CEA or CAS between 2010 and 2019 in France were included. Information on individual patients and hospital characteristics was retrieved. A random effects logistic regression model compared the occurrence of PPSD30 after CEA or CAS. High surgical risk was accounted for by using propensity score matching and adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. Analyses were also stratified to consider symptomatic and asymptomatic patients separately.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2019, 164 248 patients underwent a carotid artery procedure in France: 156 561 CEA and 7 687 CAS (including about 25% asymptomatic women and 40% high risk patients). The PPSD30 rate was 1.5% overall (n = 2 514 patients) (1.5% after CEA vs. 2.4% after CAS), 1.3% in asymptomatic patients (1.2% after CEA vs. 1.8% after CAS), and 3.3% in symptomatic patients (3.1% after CEA vs. 6.5% after CAS). After matching and adjustment, the risk of PPSD30 was statistically significantly greater in patients who underwent CAS than in patients who underwent CEA (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 - 1.8 overall; aOR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1 - 1.8 in asymptomatic patients; and aOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.8 - 4.0 in symptomatic patients).

CONCLUSION

This nationwide real life study showed that CEA performed better than CAS, more markedly in symptomatic patients, but also in asymptomatic patients. Moreover, many patients received procedures that were more likely to be harmful than beneficial according to conclusions from past randomised trials (i.e., all asymptomatic women, all high surgical risk patients, and all who had undergone CAS).

[Stenting of the extracranial internal carotid artery]

The treatment of patients with stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) is based on established guidelines, which includes both surgical and endovascular treatment options; however, the most recent advances, including the emergence of new endovascular treatment methods and techniques, combined with more recent clinical results, throw a new light on the optimal selection and treatment of patients in the current practice. This article deals with the most recent advances in the field of stenting of the extracranial internal carotid artery.

Diagnostics Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detection of Atherosclerotic Plaque Characteristics in Carotid Arteries Compared to Histology: A Systematic Review

Carotid plaque composition represents one of the main risk factors of future ischemic stroke. MRI provides excellent soft tissue contrast that can distinguish plaque characteristics. Our objective was to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of MRI imaging in the detection of carotid plaque characteristics compared to histology in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis through a systematic review. After prospective registration in PROSPERO (ID CRD42022329690), Medline Ovid, Embase.com, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science Core were searched without any search limitation up to May 27, 2022 to identify eligible articles. Of the 8168 studies, 53 (37 × 1.5 T MRI, 17 × 3 T MRI) evaluated MRI accuracy in the detection of 13 specific carotid plaque characteristics in 169 comparisons. MRI demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for detection of calcification (3 T MRI: mean sensitivity 92%/mean specificity 90%; 1.5 T MRI: mean sensitivity 81%/mean specificity 91%), fibrous cap (1.5 T: 89%/87%), unstable plaque (1.5 T: 89%/87%), intraplaque hemorrhage (1.5 T: 86%/88%), and lipid-rich necrotic core (1.5 T: 89%/79%). MRI also proved to have a high level of tissue discrimination for the carotid plaque characteristics investigated, allowing potentially for a better risk assessment and follow-up of patients who may benefit from more aggressive treatments. These results emphasize the role of MRI as the first-line imaging modality for comprehensive assessment of carotid plaque morphology, particularly for unstable plaque. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Neuro-ophthalmic outcomes after carotid intervention for ocular symptoms

BACKGROUND

The long-term neuro-ophthalmic outcomes after carotid intervention in patients presenting with preoperative visual symptoms vary widely based on the underlying etiology of retinal ischemia and are not well understood.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients presenting with retinal ischemia who subsequently underwent carotid intervention from January 2018 to December 2022. Patients were classified into three groups (group I: amaurosis fugax/vascular transient monocular vision loss, group II: ocular ischemic syndrome [OIS], and group III: central/branch retinal artery occlusion). Clinical details and the nature of visual symptoms were recorded. Outcomes analyzed were ipsilateral symptom recurrence, visual improvement, stroke rate, and survival.

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients were included in this study (70 male, aged 75 ± 9 years): 31 patients (34%) in group I (amaurosis fugax), 7 patients (8%) in group II (OIS), and 52 patients (58%) in group III central/branch retinal artery occlusion. Atherosclerotic risk factors were similar across groups with similar preoperative antiplatelet and statin use. Interventions performed were carotid endarterectomy in 64 (71%), transfemoral carotid artery stenting in 21 (23%), transcarotid artery revascularization in 4 (4%), and carotid artery bypass in 1 patient (1%). The median follow-up was 38.5 months (range: 0-207 months). There was no recurrence of transient or permanent retinal ischemic events in any patient in group I. In group II, 5 of 7 patients presenting with transient symptoms of OIS showed resolution of symptoms and ocular signs. Two patients presenting with permanent vision loss in group II had no improvement but no worsening symptoms, and visual decline was reported in two patients in group III. Ipsilateral stroke rate was 2% at 5 years for the entire group. Survival was 93% and 82% at 1 and 5 years, respectively, with no difference between groups (P < .05). There was one postoperative death from ischemic stroke secondary to stent thrombosis within 30 days (group III), with no long-term mortality from cerebrovascular disease in the rest of the cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuro-ophthalmic outcomes after carotid intervention for visual symptoms are favorable with low symptomatic recurrence after both carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting. Intervention for OIS when detected early (with transient symptoms) is associated with resolution of symptoms and prevention of permanent visual loss.

Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy of the saphenous trunks is associated with a low 5-year recurrence rate and improved quality of life in patients with chronic venous disease: A multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

The study attempts to test whether ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) is a durable treatment for incompetent great saphenous vein (GSV) and incompetent small saphenous vein (SSV) in primary chronic venous disease (CVD), Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology (CEAP) clinical grade 2 to 4 disease. Secondary end points are to evaluate its safety in terms of complications, to compare patients' quality of life before and after the treatment, and to identify risk factors that may predict recurrence of CVD after UGFS.

METHODS

Multicenter retrospective cohort study on 346 patients. The sclerosing agent was sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS) in foam. The foam was prepared with the double-syringe technique (liquid-to-gas CO2O2 30:70 ratio of 1:4). The sclerosing agent concentrations were 1% for saphenous trunk diameter 4 to 7 mm, 3% for saphenous trunk of >7 mm. Sodium tetradecyl sulfate was injected directly into the GSV/SSV, achieving a total maximum volume of 10 mL per session. A median of two sessions was performed (range, 1-5).

RESULTS

In this cohort, 205 patients were categorized as CEAP C2 (59.2%), and 141 (40.8%) had worse CVD (CEAP ≥3). The median follow-up was 60 months (range, 6-60 months). At the end of follow-up, 296 patients (85.5%) had no truncal reflux, with a 5-year disease-free time (between last procedure and evidence of recurrent disease) of 77.7 ± 2.16%. GSV and SSV showed similar 5-year recurrence-free time rates (69.9% vs 76.8%; P = ns), whereas patients with a diameter of the saphenous trunk of ≤8 mm had lower recurrence than those with >8 mm (91.3% vs 46%; P < .0001). Ninety patients (26%) showed CVD recurrence, occurring at a median of 48 months. A further UGFS treatment was needed in 50 symptomatic patients (14.4%), resulting in an 80% success rate. At univariate analysis, large diameter of the saphenous trunk (P < .0001), male sex (P = .030) and greater number of treatment sessions (P = .009) were identified as significant prognostic factors for recurrence. Immediate complications occurred in 3.7% of patients: seven headache and six visual disturbances. Endovenous foam-induced thrombosis was detected in six patients (2.8%) 1 week after treatment. Cutaneous hyperpigmentation appeared in 37 patients (10.7%). Post-treatment revised Venous Clinical Severity Score and Chronic Venous Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire 14 scores were significantly lower than before treatment (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

UGFS of the GSV/SSV is effective, safe in the long term and well-accepted by patients. UGFS is a viable option to surgery and endovenous thermal or nonthermal ablation in the treatment of saphenous trunk incompetence (CEAP clinical grade 2-4).

The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessing carotid plaque vulnerability and predicting stroke risk

The presence of vulnerable carotid plaques plays a critical role in ischemic stroke pathogenesis, with intraplaque neovascularization (IPN) serving as a key indicator of plaque instability. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) provides a comprehensive evaluation of both plaque surface morphology and microvascular features. This study assesses the utility of CEUS in identifying vulnerable carotid plaques, quantifying IPN, and predicting stroke risk. The study involved 91 patients with carotid stenosis who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Preoperative assessments included CEUS and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR-MRI). Following surgery, plaque samples were collected and subjected to pathological analysis. CEUS offered comprehensive morphological insights, categorizing plaques by the direction of diffusion into inside-out and non-inside-out types. Neovascularization was semi-quantitatively evaluated using CEUS. HR-MRI and pathological assessments identified the composition and vulnerability of plaques. Microvessel density (MVD), microvessel area (MVA), and microvessel ratio (MVR) in plaque sections were quantified using high-power microscopy. Among the 91 subjects, 53 had a history of symptomatic stroke, while 38 had experienced asymptomatic stroke events. The analysis identified a significant association between symptomatic stroke events and fibrous cap rupture (FCR), as indicated by CEUS (P = 0.032), contrast agent diffusion within the plaque (P = 0.002), and a semi-quantitative grade 3 neovascularization (P = 0.007). Regression analysis further established CEUS grade 3 as an independent predictor of symptomatic stroke events (OR = 3.39, 95% CI: 1.25-9.19). CEUS showed comparable sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy in identifying vulnerable plaques when compared to HR-MRI, with slightly superior values for CEUS; however, the differences did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.503). Plaques demonstrating inside-out contrast agent diffusion had a markedly higher incidence of FCR and intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) than those without such diffusion (P < 0.001). A positive correlation existed between the CEUS grade and both MVD and MVR (P < 0.001), but no significant relationship was observed with MVA (P = 0.221). Additionally, a significant association was found between the CEUS grade and IPH (P = 0.008). In summary, this study emphasizes the utility of CEUS in identifying vulnerable carotid plaques and evaluating neovascularization, both of which correlate with stroke risk. Notably, a CEUS grade 3 score may serve as an independent predictor of symptomatic stroke. This evidence supports the potential of CEUS as an effective, non-invasive method for assessing carotid plaque instability and identifying individuals at elevated risk for stroke.

Raman spectroscopy combined with machine learning and chemometrics analyses as a tool for identification atherosclerotic carotid stenosis from serum

Atherosclerosis carotid stenosis (ACS) is one of the main causes of stroke. Unfortunately, the highest number of people go to the doctor with an advanced disease or as a result of a stroke, because carotid atherosclerosis does not cause obvious symptoms. Therefore, it is important to find a diagnostic method to detect the disease during routine tests (using blood or serum). Consequently, in this article, Raman spectroscopy was tested as a potential diagnostic method. Indeed, Raman spectra of serum collected from ACS and control patients showed decrease of Raman peak around 1520 cm-1 and increase of peak around 3050 cm-1 in people with ACS. Moreover in people with ACS shift of peaks originating from amides II, I and lipids vibrations were noticed in comparison with control group. Interestingly, decision tree algorithm showed that peaks at 1656 cm-1 and 2957 cm-1 could be a spectroscopy markers of atherosclerotic carotid stenosis. Continuing, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) clearly showed distinguishing between serum collected from ACS and control patients, while machine learning algorithms showed high value of accuracy, sensitivity and selectivity (more than 90 %). Finally, value of area under the curve of Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUC-ROC) showed value of 0.81 for Raman range between 800 cm-1 and 1800 cm-1 and 0.86 for 2800 cm-1-3000 cm-1 range. Obtained results clearly showed possibility of Raman spectroscopy in detection of ACS from serum.

Incremental clinical value of intraplaque neovascularization in predicting recurrent ischemic stroke

OBJECTIVE

Carotid intraplaque neovascularization (IPN) detected by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a risk factor for recurrent ischemic stroke. However, it is still unclear whether IPN can be used to accurately identify patients with recurrent ischemic stroke in clinical practice. Herein, we investigated the clinical predictive value of IPN for recurrent ischemic stroke in a real-world setting.

METHODS

We enrolled 200 patients with ischemic stroke and atherosclerotic carotid stenosis who were followed up for 2 years. The endpoint was recurrent ischemic stroke. Cox regression and subgroup analyses were employed to assess whether treatment affected the relationship between IPN and recurrent ischemic stroke. The net classification index (NRI) and integrated discriminant improvement index (IDI) were used to validate the additional clinical value of IPN in identifying recurrent ischemic stroke.

RESULTS

During the 2-year follow-up, 36 patients experienced recurrent ischemic stroke. Cox regression analyses showed that IPN (grade 2), hypoechoic plaque, high homocysteine levels, and smoking were independent risk factors for recurrent ischemic stroke. Additional IPN evaluation may increase the NRI (0.512; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.083-0.624) and IDI (0.151; 95% CI: 0.010-0.213) for identifying high-risk patients with recurrent ischemic stroke. In addition, in the subgroup undergoing revascularization, the proportion of IPN (grade 2) was significantly higher in patients with recurrent ischemic stroke than in patients with nonrecurrent ischemic stroke (p = 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

In clinical settings, IPN, assessed by CEUS, may provide additional clinical value for predicting recurrent ischemic stroke, helping to identify patients with ischemic stroke who require close follow-up.

CAS-OPCABG vs OPCABG-alone in patients with asymptomatic carotid Stenosis: Multi-center experience

Objective

The objective was to evaluate the relationship between carotid stenting and off-pump coronary artery grafting (CAS-OPCABG) and OPCABG only in patients with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis.

Methods

This study retrospectively included 669 patients with asymptomatic severe carotid artery stenosis who underwent OPCABG at multiple centers. After propensity score matching for baseline characteristics, the study compared two groups of patients with clinical data, early and midterm death, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI).

Results

After matching, there was no significant difference between two groups at baseline. The rates of early stroke, midterm stroke, and intensive care unit (ICU) stay were significantly lower in the CAS OPCABG group, yet the use of the internal mammary artery (IMA) was comparatively lower. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in midterm mortality between two groups. In the bilateral asymptomatic carotid stenosis subgroup, the early stroke rate was significantly lower after CAS-OPCABG, but there was no significant difference in the unilateral carotid stenosis subgroup. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified previous atrial fibrillation, previous stroke, aortic atherosclerosis, bilateral carotid stenosis and the use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) as significant risk factors for early postoperative stroke, CAS emerged as a protective factor. Use of IMA was found to be a protective factor against postoperative mortality.

Conclusions

CAS-OPCABG is an efficacious and safe approach for the treatment of asymptomatic severe carotid artery stenosis, effectively decreasing the incidence of postoperative stroke.

Benefits of prophylactic carotid revascularization in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: A narrative review

Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are at increased risk of perioperative stroke. Carotid atherosclerosis has been identified as an independent risk factor for stroke during and in the early postoperative period of cardiac surgery. However, the pathogenesis of peri-CABG stroke is multifactorial and frequently involves other noncarotid causes, such as cardiac emboli and aortic atheroma. Therefore, routine population-wide screening of carotid stenosis is not recommended, but target screening of patients at high risk of carotid-related perioperative stroke can have benefits. Carotid duplex sonography is recommended as an initial screening tool. Elimination of carotid stenosis before cardiac surgery is indicated in patients in whom carotid atherosclerosis is suspected to be the primary contributor to perioperative stroke. In patients with advanced carotid atherosclerosis, an individualized revascularization approach, including simultaneous or staged procedures, is advocated. The prevailing consensus is that synchronous surgery is safer than staged procedures. Carotid artery stenting represents a less invasive alternative, but its role in high-risk patients requires further investigation. In conclusion, the risk of perioperative stroke in patients undergoing CABG involves different factors, and carotid artery stenosis is involved in its pathogenesis only in some patients. Therefore, individualized approaches and careful consideration of patient risk factors are essential in determining the need for carotid screening and revascularization before CABG.

Emergency carotid endarterectomy with stent retrieval in a patient with stent migration following failed carotid artery stenting

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has become a favoured alternative to surgical carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in select cases of critical internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion. However, complications such as stent migration or entrapment can occur, necessitating prompt diagnosis and intervention. We present a case of a 75-year-old diabetic male who underwent CAS for recurrent presyncope at a private hospital, and during the procedure of CAS the stent was migrated and its proximal part was impacted in the critically narrowed part of the ICA. The operating team failed to retrieve the stent and due to the unavailability of a vascular surgeon at their center, the patient was referred to us for stent retrieval and CEA. The patient underwent emergency carotid stent extraction and CEA with autologous saphenous vein graft patch reconstruction of ICA. His postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged home on the 5th postoperative day. This case highlights the significance of multidisciplinary decision-making and prompt intervention in optimizing patient outcomes.

Ultrasound Strain Imaging for Characterizing Atherosclerotic Plaque in the Carotid Arteries of Asymptomatic Subjects

OBJECTIVE

The rupture of vulnerable plaques in the carotid artery is a leading cause of strokes. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the standard for quantifying plaque composition, its high costs and lengthy procedure times limit large-scale use. Compound ultrasound strain imaging (CUSI) ultrasound offers a non-invasively alternative by assessing tissue deformation/strain within the arterial wall. Previous studies have demonstrated the relationship between strain values and plaque composition, primarily focusing on longitudinal acquisitions, which only image the proximal and distal parts of the wall. This study examines CUSI in transverse imaging planes, which enables visualization of the entire cross-section of the vessel wall. CUSI has already been validated on a symptomatic population. Therefore, the aim is to determine whether CUSI can differentiate plaque composition in asymptomatic individuals with an increased cardiovascular risk profile, validated by MRI.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 42 plaques in 28 participants. Ultrasound data were acquired with a Samsung Medison Accuvix V10 with an L5-13IS transducer and RF-interface. An experienced neuroradiologist classified plaques with MRI using the Siemens 3.0T MAGNETOM Skyra MRI (Erlangen, Germany) with a dedicated coil. Strain differences were compared across four plaque categories (calcified, lipid, hemorrhagic, fibrous/aspecific) and for vulnerable versus stable plaques.

RESULTS

A difference in strain values was found between lipid and calcified plaques (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.05). Additionally, vulnerable plaques exhibited higher strain values than stable plaques (independent samples test, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CUSI values differ between lipid and calcified and between stable and vulnerable plaques. Minor differences were found between the other plaque types.

Treat the patient, not the disease: The embolic stroke of undetermined source as an opportunity to optimize cardiovascular prevention in a holistic approach

For any physician treating a patient with a medical condition of unclear etiology, the differential diagnosis aims to identify the actual most probable cause among various potential etiologies, in order to tailor treatment options. In patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), this can be challenging due to the frequent presence of multiple potential embolic sources, raising difficulties to identify the most likely cause. Additionally, despite targeted preventive measures for the presumed embolic source, patients may remain at risk for stroke and cardiovascular events due to other unrecognized or underestimated pathologies. The multi-level complexity and multimorbidity typically associated with ESUS, represents a challenge that requires broad knowledge of the cardiovascular pathophysiology, deep expertise of the available diagnostic and therapeutic options, and interdisciplinary approach. At the same time, it is an ideal opportunity to assess thoroughly the overall cardiovascular status of the patient, which in turn can allow us to optimize therapeutic and preventive strategies in a holistic approach, and prevent future strokes, cardiovascular events and disability through different parallel pathways. In this context, rather than narrowing our perspective on identifying the specific embolic source presumed to be the most likely cause of ESUS, it is crucial to shift our focus from the disease to the patient, and evaluate the overall cardiovascular profile by assessing the risk of all cardiovascular comorbidities present, no matter if causally associated with ESUS or not. In order to bring across these points and more, this article is centred around a clinical case that serves as a starting point to illustrate the holistic approach to the management of patients with ESUS. After all, this is the beauty, the magic and the art of Internal Medicine: to treat the patient, not the disease, the system or the organ.

High-risk plaque characteristics associated with recurrent stroke in patients with intracranial stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification based on intracranial plaque characteristics is crucial for patients with intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS). Nonetheless, there remains a significant deficit of validated imaging markers capable of predicting recurrent strokes. Consequently, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the prognostic significance of high-risk plaque characteristics (HPCs) in relation to recurrent stroke.

METHODS

The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420245820945). We systematically searched PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science for studies evaluating the association between HPCs and risk of stroke recurrence. Data were aggregated and pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogenicity and publication bias were assessed, with subgroup and sensitivity analyses performed where appropriate.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies, comprising 13 prospective and 5 retrospective, involving a total of 4967 patients (3594 symptomatic, and 1373 asymptomatic), were included in the analysis. Among symptomatic patients, those with HPCs exhibited a higher incidence of stroke recurrence compared to those without HPCs (adjusted HR, 3.90 ([95% CI, 2.15-7.08]). ICAS patients with baseline plaque enhancement (adjusted HR, 5.20 [95% CI, 3.12-8.66]), calcification (adjusted HR, 2.92 [95% CI, 1.32-6.45]), high plaque steepness (adjusted HR, 110.27 [95% CI, 4.75-2559.74]), and progression in plaque burden (adjusted HR, 6.29 [95% CI, 1.62-24.45]) were identified as being at an increased risk of stroke recurrence. Subgroup analyses revealed that traditional cerebrovascular risk factors, including increasing age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and smoking, further elevated the risk of HPC-related stroke recurrence in ICAS patients.

CONCLUSION

The identification of HPCs confers independent prognostic value for the prediction of stroke recurrence in ICAS patients, which could be instrumental for patients risk stratification.

Management of Cerebral 4-Vessel Disease With Anterior Circulation Symptoms by Stenting Both Vertebral Arteries at the Same Session

PURPOSE

Stroke is among the leading causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. The coexistence of bilateral carotid and vertebral artery (VA) occlusion and/or stenosis is in the very rare entity group in the literature. Here, we present a case with bilateral carotid artery occlusion and bilateral VA stenosis, who presented with an atypical clinical presentation and underwent bilateral vertebral percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting in the same session.

CASE REPORT

A 67 year old male patient was brought to the emergency department with complaints of inability to speak and weakness in both legs for 1 day. There were bilateral infarct areas in the anterior cerebral artery region and an additional infarct area in the left middle cerebral artery region. First, the right VA stenosis level was crossed using a 0.14 guidewire. After PTA, balloon-expandable stenting was performed with a 3.0×12 mm NC (non-compliant) balloon, and nearly complete recanalization was observed. Therefore, it was decided to perform an intervention on the left VA in the same session.

CONCLUSION

As in this example case, in cases where cerebral perfusion is severely impaired, medical treatment after recanalization may be one of the best treatment options.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The carotid arteries are the main arteries supplying the anterior circulation, and the vertebral arteries supply blood to the posterior circulation. However, in cases where both carotid arteries are occluded/dysfunctional, all cerebral perfusion remains over the vertebrobasilar system. However, in cases such as this, where both carotid arteries are occluded/dysfunctional, all cerebral perfusion remains over the vertebrobasilar system and may be responsible for anterior circulation strokes. The situation becomes more severe if both vertebral artery critical stenosis is added. Synchronous carotid and vertebral artery revascularization is not recommended in the guidelines for patients with combined carotid and vertebral artery disease. In patients with four-vessel occlusion/stenosis, as in this particular case, the intervention method and priorities are unclear. We achieved a favorable clinical outcome with simultaneous bilateral vertebral artery angioplasty and stenting, a hazardous method that can be a guide as an approach option in similar cases.

Carotid web: Pathophysiology, diagnostic, and therapeutic options. A narrative review

A carotid web (CaWeb), otherwise known as a carotid bulb diaphragm, is a spur of intimal fibrous tissue extending into the carotid bulb. It is a rare, underdiagnosed cause of ischemic strokes in young people. The purpose of this narrative review was to provide an update on CaWebs, highlighting recent evolutions in their management. We undertook a comprehensive literature search on main electronic databases - MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE - using a dedicated equation to include studies up to February 13, 2024. We also searched for the most recent guidelines about carotid disease or stroke including CaWeb management. A CaWeb is found in up to 10% of young patients, particularly young women, with severe anterior stroke due to an arterial-arterial embolism from the intra-nidus thrombus. Most patients with a CaWeb have less than 50% stenosis on duplex ultrasound, and diagnosis is mostly obtained by computed tomography angiography. When applying traditional stenosis criteria for symptomatic disease (> 50% stenosis), this highly morbid condition is easily overlooked, leading to recurrent strokes. Antithrombotic treatment is associated with a high recurrence rate of stroke after the index event. The first-line treatment of symptomatic CaWebs is increasingly based on endarterectomy or stenting. The lack of recommendations before 2021 and recent discordant guidelines make CaWeb management complex. No guidelines are available to manage patients with asymptomatic CaWebs. Results from ongoing multicenter registries will be useful in guiding management decisions.

Medical treatment versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis traditionally relies on revascularization procedures. However, evolution of medical treatment over the last decades, prompted the possibility to consider a best medical treatment approach as viable for the management of low-risk symptomatic patients. Nevertheless, there is limited evidence on the long-term outcomes of symptomatic patients treated medically, being critical to reassess the risk-benefit balance of invasive procedures in addition to best medical treatment. This study aims to review evidence on long-term outcomes of symptomatic carotid stenosis patients treated with best medical treatment alone and assess whether additional revascularization offers any beneficial effects.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review was performed according to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis statement and guidelines.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

There was a trend for a higher risk of stroke (pooled risk of 6.96% [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.76-9.15%]), death (pooled risk of 3.14% [95% CI: 1.64-4.64%]), and the combined outcome of stroke or death (pooled risk of 8.91% [95% CI: 6.49-11.33%]) in the medical group compared to patients undergoing revascularization procedures: 4.51% (95% CI: 2.67-6.35%), 2.65% (95% CI: 1.23-4.08%), and 6.56% (95% CI: 4.37-8.76%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

While best medical treatment has undergone significant advancements in recent decades, there is scarce data regarding the long-term outcomes of symptomatic patients receiving such treatment. Future research investigating the treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis by surgery or endovascular methods should incorporate medical treatment arms to accurately assess the incidence of recurrent events in patients undergoing best medical treatment in the long-term.

Predictive Factors Driving Positive Awake Test in Carotid Endarterectomy Using Machine Learning

BACKGROUND

Positive neurologic awake testing during the carotid cross-clamping may be present in around 8% of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The present work aimed to assess the accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered risk calculator in predicting intraoperative neurologic deficits (INDs).

METHODS

Data was collected from carotid interventions performed between January 2012 and January 2023 under regional anesthesia. Patients with IND were selected along with consecutive controls without IND in a case-control study design. A predictive model for IND was developed using machine learning, specifically Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model, and its performance was assessed and compared to an existing predictive model. Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was employed for the model interpretation.

RESULTS

Among 216 patients, 108 experienced IND during CEA. The AI-based predictive model achieved a robust area under the curve of 0.82, with an accuracy of 0.75, precision of 0.88, sensitivity of 0.59, and F1Score of 0.71. High body mass index (BMI) increased contralateral carotid stenosis, and a history of limb paresis or plegia were significant IND risk factors. Elevated preoperative platelet and hemoglobin levels were associated with reduced IND risk.

CONCLUSIONS

This AI model provides precise IND prediction in CEA, enabling tailored interventions for high-risk patients and ultimately improving surgical outcomes. BMI, contralateral stenosis, and selected blood parameters emerged as pivotal predictors, bringing significant advancements to decision-making in CEA procedures. Further validation in larger cohorts is essential for broader clinical implementation.

In-Stent Restenosis after Carotid Artery Stent Placement Comparing Maximum Plaque Predilation and Postdilation

PURPOSE

To compare the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and ipsilateral neurologic symptoms in patients treated with maximum plaque dilation before stent deployment (max-pre-D) and stent placement followed by angioplasty (post-D) technical variants of carotid artery stent placement at midterm follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single-center, real-world, retrospective comparative study of 307 patients treated in a single vascular surgery unit between 2014 and 2018. The follow-up protocol consisted of Doppler US performed at 1, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. The primary outcome was to compare the incidence of ISR ≥70% in patients treated with post-D and max-pre-D. Secondary outcomes included between-group comparison of the following: (a) symptomatic ISR, (b) reinterventions, and (c) ipsilateral neurologic events.

RESULTS

A total of 270 patients (121 in the max-pre-D group and 149 in the post-D group) fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included in the statistical analysis. Mean follow-up was 30.5 months (SD ± 25.6). The ISR rate was 4.1% (n = 5) in the max-pre-D group and 2.7% (n = 4) in the post-D group, with no significant difference in the survival analysis (log-rank P = .664). Symptomatic ISR and retreatment occurred in 3 patients (33.3% of the total ISR for each outcome). Twenty-one ipsilateral neurologic events occurred, 7 in the max-pre-D group (5.8%) and 14 in the post-D group (9.9%), with no statistically significant difference in survival analysis (log-rank P = .315).

CONCLUSIONS

ISR and major neurologic events did not differ significantly between the max-pre-D and post-D groups. Max-pre-D seemed to be as effective as post-D technique in midterm follow-up.

Brain natriuretic peptide is a long-term cardiovascular predictor in carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

In noncardiac surgery, several biomarkers are known to play a role in predicting long-term complications, such as major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction, or death. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is considered a low to medium-risk surgery for carotid stenosis aimed at preventing stroke events. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a biomarker with potential prognostic value regarding MACE. Since its role in patients undergoing CEA is unknown, this study aims to assess the potential role of BNP as a short and long-term predictor of all-cause mortality and MACE in patients undergoing CEA.

METHODS

From a prospective database, patients who underwent CEA under regional anesthesia (RA) at a tertiary hospital center were enrolled, and a post hoc analysis was conducted. Patients on which BNP levels were measured up to fifteen days before surgery, and two groups based on the BNP threshold (200 pg/mL) were defined and compared. Kaplan Meier survival curves and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) were assessed by multivariable Cox regression. The primary outcome was the incidence of long-term MACE and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of AMI and AHF.

RESULTS

A total of 89 patients were evaluated. The mean age of the cohort was 71.2 ± 8.7 years, with 71 (79.8%) males, and presented a median follow-up of 30 [13.5-46.4] months. BNP > 200 pg/mL has demonstrated positive predictive value for MACE (aHR: 5.569, confidence interval (CI): 2.441-12.7, p < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (aHR: 3.469, CI: 1.315-9.150, p = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

BNP has been demonstrated to independently predict long-term all-cause mortality, MACE and AMI following CEA. It serves as a low-cost, ready-to-use biomarker, although further studies are necessary.

Caught Between Heart and Limbs: Navigating the Treatment of Patients With CAD and PAD in an Overwhelmed Healthcare System

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) are manifestations of atherosclerosis, affecting a substantial proportion of the population. Despite their interrelation, the prevalence of CAD in severe PAD varies, prompting the need to understand their complex relationship. This study retrospectively analyzes prospectively collected data from a high-volume vascular center to assess CAD prevalence, risk factors, and implications for patients undergoing vascular surgery. Among 667 arterial disease patients, 19.5% underwent coronary angiography, with CAD detected in 61.5% of cases. CAD varied across vascular beds. Decision-making around preoperative coronary angiography and revascularization remains complex, with benefits for high-risk patients still being debated. In accordance with current guidelines, the routine practice of coronary revascularization preceding vascular surgery is generally discouraged. This study underscores the need for risk stratification to identify patients who might benefit from coronary revascularization prior to vascular surgery while adhering to cost-effectiveness and avoiding unnecessary and time-consuming diagnostics in the majority of patients. Patient demographics, risk factors, and clinical presentation were analyzed alongside hospital stay, mortality, and complications. The study highlights the challenges in managing patients with concurrent CAD and PAD and calls for improved protocols for treating this high-risk group.

Carotid artery stenosis and ischemic cerebrovascular events after radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer

Radiotherapy is the main treatment for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and is associated with an increased risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events (ICVE). The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to determine the incidence of ICVE and carotid artery stenosis (CAS) in patients with HNC who receive radiotherapy and the risk factors for CAS. We enrolled 907 patients with HNC who underwent radiotherapy between February 2011 and June 2022 and obtained information on their clinical and tumor characteristics and their treatment from the clinical records. Data on risk factors for atherosclerosis, medications used, and radiotherapy were also collected. The patients were followed through to the end of 2023 unless they died or were lost to follow-up. The overall incidence of ICVE was 1.98%, with a cumulative incidence of 1.65% over 5 years. In patients who did not have a preexisting carotid artery lesion, the cumulative incidence of significant CAS was 1.3% at 12 months, 2.2% at 24 months, and 2.5% at 36 months post-radiotherapy. The most important risk factors for new CAS were age >65 years (aHR = 2.60, p = 0.008, 95% confidence Interval: 1.28-5.30), laryngeal cancer (aHR = 2.36, p<0.017, 95% confidence Interval: 1.01-5.55), and total plaque score (aHR = 1.38, p<0.001, 95% confidence Interval: 1.23-1.56). There was a significant increase in stenosis, plaque score, and wall thickness in all areas in the carotid artery (p<0.001). The incidence of ICVE and the cumulative incidence of CAS was found to be lower in the Thai population than in other populations. The main risk factors for new CAS were age >65 years, laryngeal cancer, and total plaque score. Changes in the carotid artery were detected early and affected all areas in the artery. Patients with HNC treated by radiotherapy should be assessed for risk factors for CAS and undergo vascular surveillance during follow-up.

Fate of External Carotid Artery Following Carotid Artery Stenting for Internal Carotid Artery near Occlusion

BACKGROUND

The external carotid artery (ECA) plays a vital role in facial perfusion and acts as a collateral pathway for cerebral blood flow during internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. In cases of carotid near-occlusion (CNO), characterized by severe ICA stenosis with hemodynamic changes, carotid artery stenting (CAS) is rising as a potential new treatment. During CAS, the stent is deployed in ICA, covering the ECA orifice. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effects of CAS on ECA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 159 patients diagnosed with CNO and treated with CAS between February 2018 and May 2023. Preoperative and postoperative ECA diameters were measured using angiography. Data on patient demographics, procedural details, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median preoperative ECA diameter was 4.34 mm, decreasing to 3.40 mm post-CAS (p < 0.001). ECA narrowing occurred in 76.39% of patients, while 4.17% experienced occlusion. A larger preoperative ECA diameter was predictive of narrowing (odds ratio (OR) = 1.35, p = 0.02) and protective against occlusion (OR = 0.1, p < 0.001). Weak correlations between ICA and ECA diameter changes were observed, indicating procedural influences on ECA dynamics.

CONCLUSIONS

CAS for CNO significantly reduces ECA diameter, with a subset of patients developing occlusion. The preoperative ECA diameter is a key predictor of postoperative changes. These findings emphasize the need for further research on CAS-related ECA hemodynamic alterations to optimize patient outcomes and minimize complications.

Evaluation of the effect of carotid sinus blockade on hemodynamic stability in carotid surgery: A retrospective study

This study assesses the effect of carotid sinus blockade applied with a local anesthetic on hemodynamic parameters during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) operations performed under general anesthesia. The medical records of patients who underwent CEA under general anesthesia between January 2020 and December 2022, were retrospectively reviewed. It was recorded whether the patients received carotid sinus block with 2 mL of 2% prilocaine. Intraoperative and 48-hour postoperative hemodynamic data were examined in the patients included in the study. A total of 129 patients were evaluated in the study, with 70 patients who received carotid sinus blockade (Group I) and 59 patients who did not receive blockade (Group II) during CEA. The comparison of heart rate variability immediately before clamping, immediately after clamping, and at 5, 10, and 20 minutes post-clamping indicated a significantly greater reduction in Group II compared to Group I (P < .05). In the postoperative period, the total dose of glyceryl trinitrate administered was 40.8 ± 31.9 mg in Group I and 53 ± 17.2 mg in Group II, showing a statistically significant difference (P = .001). Additionally, blood pressure measurements during this period were significantly higher in Group II than in Group I (P < .05). While the application of a local anesthetic during CEA appears to provide better intraoperative heart rate and postoperative blood pressure control, attributing these results solely to local anesthesia may not be entirely accurate. Hemodynamic instability observed during and after CEA is influenced by various factors.

Atherosclerotic plaque instability in symptomatic non-significant carotid stenoses

Objective

Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis is recommended for patients with >70% stenosis, but not in those with <50%. Because non-significant, low-degree stenoses may still cause strokes, refined risk stratification is necessary, which could be improved by assessing biological features of plaque instability. To challenge risk-stratification based on luminal narrowing, we compared biological features of carotid plaques from symptomatic patients with low-degree (<50%) vs high-degree (>70%) stenosis and explored potential mechanisms behind plaque instability in low-degree stenoses.

Methods

Endarterectomy specimens were taken from symptomatic patients with high-degree (n = 204) and low-degree (n = 34) stenosis, all part of the Biobank of Karolinska Endarterectomies. Patient demographics, image-derived plaque morphology, and gene expression analyses of extracted lesions were used for comparisons. Plaque biology was assessed by transcriptomics using dimensionality reduction, differential gene expression, and gene-set enrichment analyses. Immunohistochemistry was used to study proteins corresponding to upregulated genes.

Results

The demographics of the two groups were statistically similar. Calcification, lipid-rich necrotic core, intraplaque hemorrhage, plaque burden, and fibrous cap thickness were similar in both groups, whereas the sum of lipid-rich necrotic core and intraplaque hemorrhage was higher (P = .033) in the high-degree stenosis group. Dimensionality reduction analysis indicated poor clustering separation of plaque gene expression in low-compared with high-degree stenosis lesions, whereas differential gene expression showed upregulation of hypoxia-inducible factor 3A (log2 fold change, 0.7212; P = .0003), and gene-set enrichment analyses identified pathways related to tissue hypoxia and angiogenesis in low-degree stenoses. Hypoxia-inducible factor 3-alpha protein was associated with smooth muscle cells in neo-vascularized plaque regions.

Conclusions

Plaques from symptomatic patients with non-significant low-degree carotid stenoses showed morphologic and biological features of atherosclerotic plaque instability that were comparable to plaques from patients with high-degree stenoses, emphasizing the need for improved stroke risk stratification for intervention in all patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis irrespective of luminal narrowing. An increased expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 3A in low-degree stenotic lesions suggested mechanisms of plaque instability associated with tissue hypoxia and plaque angiogenesis, but the exact role of hypoxia-inducible factor 3A in this process remains to be determined.

Clinical relevance

Carotid plaques from symptomatic patients with <50% stenosis show morphologic and biological features of plaque instability, comparable to high-degree stenosis, which emphasizes the need for improved stroke risk stratification beyond stenosis severity.

Suprasternal aortic arch echocardioscopy as a potential tool in detection and follow-up of mobile thrombi in patients with ischemic stroke

Introduction

Severe or complicated atheromatosis of the aortic arch represents an important and often underdiagnosed embolic source in patients with ischemic stroke. The presence of a floating thrombus has significant clinical relevance, as it is associated with a high risk of early recurrence. The aim of this study was to analyze the potential of echocardiographic examination through the suprasternal window in both the detection of embolic sources and the monitoring of the response to anticoagulant treatment in patients with mobile thrombi.

Methods

This case series study included ten consecutive patients with a mobile floating aortic arch thrombus associated with an atheromatous plaque, detected by focused echocardiography and confirmed by Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA). Epidemiological, clinical, radiological, and ultrasound characteristics were analyzed. Clinical and ultrasound follow-up was performed after initiation of anticoagulation as secondary prevention to assess the efficacy and safety of this treatment.

Results

Ten patients (seven female) with a mean age of 76 years were identified. After anticoagulation, a complete resolution of the mobile thrombus was observed in eight of them during ultrasound follow-up. One patient suffered an ischemic recurrence. Two patients receiving associated antiplatelet therapy presented severe hemorrhagic complications, one of which was fatal. Once the disappearance of the mobile thrombus was detected, anticoagulation was discontinued, and no further ischemic recurrences were observed.

Discussion

Floating thrombus of the aortic arch is an underdiagnosed but clinically relevant condition. The study of the aortic arch with echocardiography through the suprasternal window is a highly available and harmless technique, that may be highly useful for the detection and monitoring of response to treatment of this pathology. Furthermore, early anticoagulation could be an effective and safe treatment in these patients.

Comparison of Endarterectomy and Stenting in the Treatment of Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Real-World Nationwide, Total Population-Based Study from Korea

PURPOSE

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) are both well-established treatments for carotid artery stenosis. We analyzed real-world data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database to compare the clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients with carotid artery stenosis registered in the NHIS from 2008 to 2018. Patients who underwent either treatment were divided into CEA or CAS groups and subjected to 1:4 propensity score matching.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 1521 CEA and 6768 CAS patients. In symptomatic patients, the stroke rate within 1 month was lower in the CAS group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61). However, the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) death was higher in the CAS group at 1 month, 1 year, and during the total follow-up (HRs, 4.18, 2.43, and 1.50). There were no significant differences in outcomes between asymptomatic patients in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The periprocedural stroke risk was higher in symptomatic carotid stenosis patients who underwent CEA, but mortality was higher in those who received CAS, both in the short and long term. In asymptomatic patients, however, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality was similar between the 2 groups.

The role of inflammation biomarkers in carotid artery stenosis procedures

BACKGROUND

Carotid revascularization procedures, such as carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS), can lead to restenosis. Monitoring restenosis onset through biomarkers is crucial in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate inflammation biomarkers in CEA and CAS to determine their predictive value for restenosis risk postprocedure.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical records of patients with carotid stenosis who underwent CEA or CAS over 1 year at the vascular surgery departments of an interuniversity center. Eligible asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis (70%-99%) underwent revascularization. Differences between preprocedural and early postprocedural inflammation indices were assessed, and restenosis risk was evaluated using receiver operating curve analysis and logistic regression.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 100 patients, 68 undergoing CEA and 32 undergoing CAS. Significant values were observed for inflammation ratios post-CEA: neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio (NLR) (P = 0.036), platelets to lymphocytes ratio (PLR) (P = 0.009), monocytes to lymphocytes ratio (MLR) (P < 0.001), systemic inflammation index (SII) (P = 0.024), systemic immune response index (SIRI) (P = 0.003), and aggregate inflammation response index (AISI) (P < 0.001). At 12-month follow-up, 12% of patients experienced restenosis; 50% were men and 50% women. Women showed a higher restenosis rate (26.1% vs 7.8%). Preintervention NLR (odds ratio {OR} [95% confidence interval {CI}] = 13.38 [1.88 to 95.44], P = 0.010) and SIRI (OR [95% CI] = 10.22 [2.65 to 39.43], P = 0.001) remained significantly associated with restenosis after adjusting for sex and smoking.

CONCLUSIONS

The study provided a predictive model for restenosis, identifying preintervention NLR and SIRI as independent predictors of restenosis at 12-month follow-up.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy after intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is the mainstay of treatment for patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke, whereas carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is indicated in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. However, the impact of prior IVT on the outcomes of CEA (IVT-CEA) is not clear. The aim of this study was to determine whether IVT may create additional stroke and death risk for CEA, compared with CEA performed in the absence of a history of recent IVT, and to determine the optimal timing for CEA after IVT.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the outcomes of IVT-CEA vs CEA, using the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases.

RESULTS

We included 11 retrospective comparative studies, in which 135,644 patients underwent CEA and 2070 underwent IVT-CEA. The pooled rate of perioperative stroke was 4.2% in the IVT-CEA group and 1.3% in the CEA group (odds ratio [OR], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-1.58; P = .21), with a high heterogenicity (I2 = 93%). The rate of stroke/death was 5.9% in patients undergoing IVT-CEA 1.9% in those receiving CEA only (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.15-1.14; I2 = 92%; P = .09); after exclusion of studies including TIA as presenting symptom, stroke/death risk was 3.6% in IVT-CEA and 3.0% in CEA (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.80-2.53; I2 = 50%; P = .11). The risk of stoke decreased with a delay in the performance of CEA (P = .268). Using results of the metaregression, the calculated delay of CEA that allows for a <6% risk was 4.6 days. Compared with CEA, patients undergoing IVT-CEA had a significantly higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage (2.5% vs 0.1%; OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.06-0.21; I2 = 28%; P < .001) and neck hematoma requiring reintervention (3.6% vs 2.3%; OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43-0.85; I2 = 0%; P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients presenting with an acute ischemic stroke, CEA can be safely performed after a prior endovenous thrombolysis, maintaining a stroke/death risk of <6%. After IVT, CEA should be deferred for ≥5 days to minimize the risk for intracranial hemorrhage and neck bleeding.

Symptomatic Cervical Carotid Artery Stenosis: Evolving Paradigms in Risk Stratification and Intervention

Symptomatic carotid disease, characterized by atherosclerotic or non-atherosclerotic internal carotid artery disease with ipsilateral stroke symptoms, represents a critical condition in stroke neurology. This "hot carotid" state carries a high risk of stroke recurrence, with almost one-fourth of the patients experiencing recurrent ischemic events within 2 weeks of initial presentation. The global prevalence of significant carotid stenosis (conventionally defined as ≥50% narrowing) is estimated at around 1.8% in men and 1.2% in women and increases with age. Management of symptomatic carotid disease remains challenging, requiring a balance between urgent medical and surgical interventions and their associated risks. Current treatment approaches combine medical management, focusing on optimal antithrombotic therapy, with revascularization procedures such as carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting. However, decision making has evolved beyond considering stenosis degree alone, now incorporating advanced imaging data on plaque composition and intraluminal characteristics. Even though there are numerous randomized trials, uncertainties persist regarding optimal management, particularly in light of improved medical therapies and emerging concepts like symptomatic non-stenotic carotid disease. Future research directions include exploring newer antithrombotic regimens, refining patient selection criteria for revascularization, and evaluating novel techniques like transcarotid artery revascularization.

Editor's Choice - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Publication Standards for Reporting Vascular Surgical Research

OBJECTIVE

Manuscripts submitted to the European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (EJVES) often contain shortcomings in baseline scientific principles and incorrectly applied methodology. Consequently, the editorial team is forced to offer post hoc repair in an attempt to support the authors to improve their manuscripts. This repair could theoretically have been prevented by providing more clear definitions and reporting standards to serve researchers when planning studies and eventually writing their manuscripts. Therefore, the general principles for EJVES publication standards are summarised here.

METHODS

These publication standards did not follow a systematic approach but reflect the common opinion of the current Senior and Section Editors team. This team decided to only include recommendations regarding the most common pathologies in vascular surgery in this first edition of publication standards, namely carotid artery disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD), and chronic venous disease. In future editions, the plan is to expand the areas of research.

RESULTS

Presented are (1) a common set of minimum but required publication standards applicable to every report, e.g., patient characteristics, study design, treatment environment, selection criteria, core outcomes of interventions such as 30 day death and morbidity, and measures for completeness of data including outcome information, and (2) a common set of minimum publication standards for four vascular areas.

CONCLUSION

The editors of the EJVES propose universally accepted definitions and publication standards for carotid artery disease, AAA, PAOD, and chronic venous disease. This will enable the development of a convincing body of evidence to aid future clinical practice guidelines and drive clinical practice in the right direction. These first ever publication and reporting standards for EJVES aim to improve future research published in the journal.

Comparing Transbrachial and Transradial as Alternatives to Transfemoral Access for Large-Bore Neuro Stenting: Insights From a Propensity-Matched Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of transbrachial access (TBA) and transradial access (TRA) compared to transfemoral access (TFA) for large-bore neuro stenting (≥7 F).

METHODS

From January 2019 to January 2024, 4752 patients received large-bore neuro stenting in our center. The primary outcomes were procedural metrics. Safety outcomes were significant access site complications, including substantial hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, artery occlusion, and complications requiring treatment (medicine, intervention, or surgery). After propensity score matching with a ratio of 1:1:2 (TBA: TRA: TFA), adjusting for age, gender, aortic arch type, and neuro stenting as covariates, outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

46 TBA, 46 TRA and 92 TFA patients were enrolled. The mean age was 67.8 ± 11.2 years, comprising 127 (69.0%) carotid artery stenting and 57 (31.0%) vertebral artery stenting. The rates of technical success (TBA: 100%, TRA: 95.7%, TFA: 100%) and significant access site complications (TBA: 4.3%, TRA: 6.5%, TFA: 1.1%) were comparable between the groups (P > 0.05). Compared to TFA, the TRA cohort exhibited significant delays in angiosuite arrival to puncture time (14 vs. 8 min, P = 0.039), puncture to angiography completion time (19 vs. 11 min, P = 0.027), and procedural duration (42 vs. 29 min, P = 0.031). There were no substantial differences in procedural time metrics between TBA (10, 14, and 31 min, respectively) and TFA.

CONCLUSION

TBA and TRA as the primary access for large-bore neuro stenting are safe and effective. Procedural delays in TRA may favor TBA as the first-line alternative access to TFA.

Long-Term Mortality and Morbidity after Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis

BACKGROUND

To investigate whether the occurrence of ischemic stroke due to carotid stenosis is a marker of the severity of atherosclerotic disease and of an excess risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and of all-cause mortality, after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

METHODS

Patients who had undergone a CEA from June 2015 to august 2016 were included. Patients were classified into 2 groups, namely symptomatic and asymptomatic. Neurological event, myocardial infarction, and death during early follow up were monitored. Major adverse cardiovascular events, major limb eventss, and all-cause mortality were compared for patients with a CEA for an asymptomatic carotid stenosis versus those with a symptomatic stenosis.

RESULTS

Among the 190 patients included, 86 (51%) had a CEA for an asymptomatic stenosis and 84 (49%) for a symptomatic stenosis. During the first 30 days, the rate of all-cause death or ischemic stroke was similar in both groups (1%, P = 0.986). After 30 days, there were a total of 35 major adverse cardiovascular events (21.3%) and 15 major limb events (9.1%) during mean follow up of 53 (22.6) months. Overall cardiovascular morbidity and mortality was 30.4% and did not differ between groups (P = 0.565). New ischemic stroke occurred in 11 patients (9.1%) and was significantly more frequent in the asymptomatic group (9 (14.8%) versus 2 (3.6%) in the symptomatic group, (odds ratio: 4.96; confidence interval 95% [1.04-23.77]; P = 0.013)). Overall all-cause mortality was 24% in both groups (P = 0.93) CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of ischemic stroke of carotid origin before revascularization does not appear to be associated with an excess risk of cardiovascular morbidity or mortality or all-cause mortality after surgery.