51
|
Bogani G, Di Donato V, Papadia A, Buda A, Casarin J, Multinu F, Plotti F, Gasparri ML, Pinelli C, Perrone AM, Ferrero S, Sorbi F, Landoni F, Palaia I, Perniola G, De Iaco P, Cianci S, Alletti SG, Petrillo M, Vizzielli G, Fanfani F, Angioli R, Muzii L, Ghezzi F, Vizza E, Mueller MD, Scambia G, Panici PB, Raspagliesi F. Hysterectomy alone vs. hysterectomy plus sentinel node mapping in endometrial cancer: Perioperative and long-term results from a propensity-score based study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:1037-1043. [PMID: 36801150 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare outcomes after hysterectomy and hysterectomy plus sentinel node mapping (SNM) in endometrial cancer (EC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective study, collecting data of EC patients treated between 2006 and 2016 in nine referral centers. RESULTS The study population included 398 (69.5%) and 174 (30.5%) patients having hysterectomy and hysterectomy plus SNM. As the results of the adoption of a propensity-score matched analysis, we selected two homogeneous cohort of patients (150 having hysterectomy only vs. 150 having hysterectomy plus SNM). The SNM group had a longer operative time, but did not correlate with length of hospital stay and estimated blood loss. Overall severe complication rates were similar between groups (0.7% in the hysterectomy group vs. 1.3% in the hysterectomy plus SNM group; p = 0.561). No lymphatic-specific complication occurred. Overall, 12.6% of patients having SNM were diagnosed with disease harboring in their lymph nodes. Adjuvant therapy administration rate was similar between groups. Considering patients having SNM, 4% of patients received adjuvant therapy on the basis of nodal status alone; all the other patients received adjuvant therapy also on the basis of uterine risk factors. Five-year disease-free (p = 0.720) and overall (p = 0.632) survival was not influenced by surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS Hysterectomy (with or without SNM) is a safe and effective method for managing EC patients. Potentially, these data support the omission of side specific lymphadenectomy in case of unsuccessful mapping. Further evidence is warranted in to confirm the role SNM in the era of molecular/genomic profiling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
| | - Violante Di Donato
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Papadia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, University' of Italian Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Alessandro Buda
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Michele e Pietro Ferrero Hospital, 12060, Verduno, Italy
| | - Jvan Casarin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Francesco Multinu
- Division of Gynecologic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Plotti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Gasparri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, University' of Italian Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Ciro Pinelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Anna Myriam Perrone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Sant'Orsola Malpighi University Hospital University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simone Ferrero
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genova, Italy
| | - Flavia Sorbi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Fabio Landoni
- Gynecology Oncology Surgical Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Innocenza Palaia
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgia Perniola
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Pierandrea De Iaco
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Sant'Orsola Malpighi University Hospital University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Cianci
- Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gueli Alletti
- Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Petrillo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Sardegna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vizzielli
- Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Angioli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Enrico Vizza
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Michael D Mueller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Raspagliesi
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Bogani G, Ray-Coquard I, Concin N, Ngoi NYL, Morice P, Caruso G, Enomoto T, Takehara K, Denys H, Lorusso D, Coleman R, Vaughan MM, Takano M, Provencher DM, Sagae S, Wimberger P, Póka R, Segev Y, Kim SI, Kim JW, Candido Dos Reis FJ, Ramirez PT, Mariani A, Leitao M, Makker V, Abu-Rustum NR, Vergote I, Zannoni G, Tan D, McCormack M, Paolini B, Bini M, Raspagliesi F, Benedetti Panici P, Di Donato V, Muzii L, Colombo N, Pignata S, Scambia G, Monk BJ. Endometrial carcinosarcoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:147-174. [PMID: 36585027 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial carcinosarcoma is a rare and aggressive high-grade endometrial carcinoma with secondary sarcomatous trans-differentiation (conversion theory). The clinical presentation and diagnostic work-up roughly align with those of the more common endometrioid counterpart, although endometrial carcinosarcoma is more frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. Endometrial carcinosarcoma is not a single entity but encompasses different histological subtypes, depending on the type of carcinomatous and sarcomatous elements. The majority of endometrial carcinosarcomas are characterized by p53 abnormalities. The proportion of POLE and microsatellite instablity-high (MSI-H) is directly related to the epithelial component, being approximately 25% and 3% in endometrioid and non-endometrioid components.The management of non-metastatic disease is based on a multimodal approach with optimal surgery followed by (concomitant or sequential) chemotherapy and radiotherapy, even for early stages. Palliative chemotherapy is recommended in the metastatic or recurrent setting, with carboplatin/paclitaxel doublet being the first-line regimen. Although the introduction of immunotherapy plus/minus a tyrosine kinase inhibitor shifted the paradigm of treatment of patients with recurrent endometrial cancer, patients with endometrial carcinosarcoma were excluded from most studies evaluating single-agent immunotherapy or the combination. However, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved the use of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib in endometrial cancer (all histotypes) after progression on chemotherapy and single-agent immunotherapy in MSI-H cancers. In the era of precision medicine, emerging knowledge on molecular endometrial carcinosarcoma is opening new promising therapeutic options for more personalized treatment. The present review outlines state-of-the-art knowledge and future directions for patients with endometrial carcinosarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Innsbruck Medical Univeristy, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave RoussT, Villejuif, France
| | - Giuseppe Caruso
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Takayuki Enomoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Belgium
| | - Kazuhiro Takehara
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Hannelore Denys
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Ghent, Gent, Belgium
| | | | - Robert Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michelle M Vaughan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Canterbury Regional Cancer and Haematology Service, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Masashi Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Medical, Japan
| | | | | | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universitat Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Yakir Segev
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carmel Hospital, Haifa, Israel
| | - Se Ik Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Weon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Andrea Mariani
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mario Leitao
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vicky Makker
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gianfranco Zannoni
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - David Tan
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Mary McCormack
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Biagio Paolini
- Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Marta Bini
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
| | | | | | - Violante Di Donato
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Sapienza of Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Maternal, Infantile, and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Medical Gynecologic Oncology Unit; University of Milan Bicocca; Milan; Italy, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| | - Sandro Pignata
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, National Cancer Institute Napels, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Bradley J Monk
- HonorHealth, University of Arizona, Creighton University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Di Dio C, Bogani G, Di Donato V, Cuccu I, Muzii L, Musacchio L, Scambia G, Lorusso D. The role of immunotherapy in advanced and recurrent MMR deficient and proficient endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 169:27-33. [PMID: 36493574 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.11.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological disease in developed countries. Although it is considered an indolent disease, advanced and recurrent endometrial carcinomas are characterized by poor prognosis. In the metastatic setting, after the failure of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, patients have limited therapeutic options. However, endometrial cancer should not be considered as a single entity but as a group of heterogeneous diseases with specific genomic, molecular, and biological features by suggested the analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Accumulating data highlighted the effectiveness and safety of the adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for several types of solid tumors. In particular, immunotherapy showed promising results in MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors. Endometrial cancer is not an exception. Endometrial cancer has the highest prevalence of MSI across human cancer types, and approximately 30% of primary endometrial cancers are MSI-H/dMMR and 13% to 30% of recurrent endometrial cancers are MSI-H/dMMR. The preliminary results of the KEYNOTE-158, the Australian NCT03015129 and the GARNET trial strongly supported the adoption of ICIs as monotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, after the failure of first-line treatments. Unfortunately, those impressive results are not achieved in patients with MMR proficient disease. Hence, other combinations were tested. In particular, the adoption of ICIs plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) showed very compelling results. Recently, the updated results of the KEYNOTE-775 showed that pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib led to significantly longer progression-free and overall survival than chemotherapy among patients with advanced endometrial cancer, irrespective of MMR status. After EMA approval, pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib represents the new standard second-line treatment in endometrial cancer patients, regardless MMR status. Further studies are investigating the role of ICIs and TKIs in the first line and are testing new combinations (e.g. ICIs plus PARP inhibitors).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Di Dio
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Roma, Italy
| | - Giorgio Bogani
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Roma, Italy.
| | - Violante Di Donato
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Roma, Italy
| | - Ilaria Cuccu
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Roma, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Roma, Italy
| | - Lucia Musacchio
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Department of Life Science and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart Largo Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Department of Life Science and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart Largo Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Radiomics and Molecular Classification in Endometrial Cancer (The ROME Study): A Step Forward to a Simplified Precision Medicine. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10122464. [PMID: 36553988 PMCID: PMC9778151 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10122464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Molecular/genomic profiling is the most accurate method to assess prognosis of endometrial cancer patients. Radiomic profiling allows for the extraction of mineable high-dimensional data from clinical radiological images, thus providing noteworthy information regarding tumor tissues. Interestingly, the adoption of radiomics shows important results for screening, diagnosis and prognosis, across various radiological systems and oncologic specialties. The central hypothesis of the prospective trial is that combining radiomic features with molecular features might allow for the identification of various classes of risks for endometrial cancer, e.g., predicting unfavorable molecular/genomic profiling. The rationale for the proposed research is that once validated, radiomics applied to ultrasonographic images would be an effective, innovative and inexpensive method for tailoring operative and postoperative treatment modalities in endometrial cancer. Patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer will have ultrasonographic evaluation and radiomic analysis of the ultrasonographic images. We will correlate radiomic features with molecular/genomic profiling to classify prognosis.
Collapse
|
55
|
Zhou X, Wei S, Shao Q, Zhang J, Zhao R, Shi R, Zhang W, Dong K, Shu W, Wang H. Laparoscopic vs. open procedure for intermediate‑ and high‑risk endometrial cancer: a minimum 4-year follow-up analysis. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1203. [PMID: 36418995 PMCID: PMC9682682 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10301-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The long-term oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic and open procedures for patients with intermediate‑ and high‑risk endometrial cancer (EC) remain unclear. Accordingly, laparoscopy cannot still be recommended as the standard choice for intermediate‑ and high‑risk EC. This retrospective study aimed to assess the perioperative and long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopy and open surgery in patients with intermediate- and high‑risk ECs within a minimum 4-year follow-up. METHODS We included 201 patients who underwent laparoscopic or open procedures for intermediate‑ and high‑risk EC between 2010 and 2017. Between-procedure comparisons of perioperative and oncological outcomes were performed using the independent t-test or Pearson's chi-squared test and the Kaplan-Meier method, respectively. RESULTS Finally, there were 136 intermediate‑ and 65 high‑risk endometrial tumors in the laparoscopic and open groups, respectively. There were no between-group differences in all baseline characteristics. Compared with the open group, the laparoscopic group had a significantly longer mean operating time (p = 0.005) and a lower mean estimated blood loss (EBL) (p = 0.031). There was a higher possibility of postoperative complication in the open group than in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.048). There were no significant between-group differences in pathological outcomes as well as the recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates (p = 0.626 and p = 0.148, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with intermediate‑ and high‑risk EC, laparoscopic surgery has an advantage over the open surgery in reducing EBL and the rate of postoperative complications without weakening the oncological control. There were no between-procedure differences in the recurrence-free and overall survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xing Zhou
- grid.33199.310000 0004 0368 7223Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei China
| | - Sitian Wei
- grid.33199.310000 0004 0368 7223Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei China
| | - Qingchun Shao
- grid.33199.310000 0004 0368 7223Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei China
| | - Jun Zhang
- grid.33199.310000 0004 0368 7223Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei China
| | - Rong Zhao
- grid.33199.310000 0004 0368 7223Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei China
| | - Rui Shi
- grid.33199.310000 0004 0368 7223Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei China
| | - Wei Zhang
- grid.33199.310000 0004 0368 7223Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei China
| | - Kejun Dong
- grid.33199.310000 0004 0368 7223Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei China
| | - Wan Shu
- grid.33199.310000 0004 0368 7223Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei China
| | - Hongbo Wang
- grid.33199.310000 0004 0368 7223Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei China
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Sone K, Suzuki E, Taguchi A, Honjoh H, Nishijima A, Eguchi S, Miyamoto Y, Iriyama T, Mori M, Osuga Y. Suspicious Positive Peritoneal Cytology (Class III) in Endometrial Cancer Does Not Affect Prognosis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11216527. [PMID: 36362755 PMCID: PMC9657754 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Positive peritoneal cytology is a poor prognostic factor in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. Suspicious positive peritoneal cytology (class III) is commonly encountered in clinical practice. However, no standard treatment protocol exists for its management. Here, we investigated a possible relationship between suspicious positive peritoneal cytology, disease stage, risk factors, and endometrial cancer prognosis. We included patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer who underwent total hysterectomy and peritoneal cytology at the University of Tokyo Hospital between 2008 and 2022. Overall, 670 patients were included in the analyses; both demographic and clinical data of the patients were collected. The proportion of patients with lymph node metastasis was significantly different between peritoneal cytology groups, showing lymph node metastasis to be more extensive in patients with positive or suspicious positive peritoneal cytology than in patients with negative peritoneal cytology (p < 0.05). Thirty-nine patients had suspicious positive peritoneal cytology. Omental resection and biopsy were performed in 16 cases. No case of omental metastasis was found. Among patients with suspected ascites cytology, no patient experienced symptom recurrence or death. Therefore, monitoring lymph node metastasis in suspicious positive cases is essential. Moreover, a change of treatment method based on the finding of suspected positive peritoneal cytology is not necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenbun Sone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Eri Suzuki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Ayumi Taguchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Harunori Honjoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Akira Nishijima
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Satoko Eguchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Miyamoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Takayuki Iriyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Mayuyo Mori
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Yutaka Osuga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Cui P, Cong X, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Liu Z. Endometrial clear cell carcinoma: A population-based study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:961155. [DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.961155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundA systematic analysis of prognostic factors concerning endometrial clear cell carcinoma (ECCC) is lacking. The current study aimed to construct nomograms predicting the overall survival (OS) of ECCC patients.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study, and predicted nomograms for 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS were established. The nomograms were verified with the consistency index (C-index), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultsA total of 1778 ECCC patients, 991 from FIGO stage I/II and 787 from FIGO stage III/IV, were included in this study. The age at diagnosis, marital status, T stage, tumor size, and surgery-independent prognostic factors in FIGO stage I/II, and the age at diagnosis, T stage, lymph node involvement, distant metastasis, tumor size, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy in FIGO stage III/IV were independent prognostic factors. The C-indexes of the training and validation group were 0.766 and 0.697 for FIGO stage I/II and 0.721 and 0.708 for FIGO stage III/IV, respectively. The calibration curve revealed good agreement between nomogram-predicted and actual observation values. The DCA established that nomograms had better clinical benefits than the traditional FIGO stage.ConclusionsThe predicted nomograms showed good accuracy, excellent discrimination ability, and clinical benefits, depicting their usage in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
58
|
Chambers SK. Advances in Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapies in Endometrial Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14205020. [PMID: 36291804 PMCID: PMC9599945 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is now recognized to be several diseases with differing biology and responses to treatment. Improved molecular characterization has furthered the development and testing of targeted therapies in the different cohorts of endometrial cancer. Lessons are being learned from other cancers that share similar molecular typing, and hence, potentially similar tumor behavior. This commentary serves as a broad overview of the types of advances to which our patients now have access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Setsuko K Chambers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Wei S, Zhang J, Shi R, Yu Z, Chen X, Wang H. Identification of an integrated kinase-related prognostic gene signature associated with tumor immune microenvironment in human uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma. Front Oncol 2022; 12:944000. [PMID: 36158685 PMCID: PMC9491090 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.944000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
In the worldwide, uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC) is the sixth most common malignancy in women, and the number of women diagnosed is increasing. Kinase plays an important role in the occurrence and development of malignant tumors. However, the research about kinase in endometrial cancer is still unclear. Here, we first downloaded the gene expression data of 552 UCEC patients and 23 healthy endometrial tissues from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), obtained 538 kinase-related genes from the previous literature, and calculated 67 differentially expressed kinases. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) were referenced to identify multiple important biological functions and signaling pathways related to 67 differentially expressed kinases. Using univariate Cox regression and Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), seven kinases (ALPK2, CAMKV, TTK, PTK6, MAST1, CIT, and FAM198B) were identified to establish a prognostic model of endometrial cancer. Then, patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups based on risk scores. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to evaluate that the model had a favorable predictive ability. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis suggested that high-risk groups experienced worse overall survival than low-risk groups. qRT-PCR and ISH assays confirmed the consistency between predicted candidate genes and real sample contents. CIBERSORT algorithm and ssGSEA were adopted to investigate the relationship between this signature and tumor immune microenvironment, and revealed that in low- and high-risk groups, the types of tumor-infiltrating immune cells and the immune cell-related functions were significantly different. In summary, a seven-gene signature risk model has been constructed, and could accurately predict the prognosis of UCEC, which may offer ideas and breakthrough points to the kinase-associated development of UCEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sitian Wei
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Rui Shi
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhicheng Yu
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xingwei Chen
- Department of Industrial engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Hongbo Wang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- *Correspondence: Hongbo Wang,
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Ngoi NYL, Westin SN, Yap TA. Targeting the DNA damage response beyond poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors: novel agents and rational combinations. Curr Opin Oncol 2022; 34:559-569. [PMID: 35787597 PMCID: PMC9371461 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have transformed treatment paradigms in multiple cancer types defined by homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and have become the archetypal example of synthetic lethal targeting within the DNA damage response (DDR). Despite this success, primary and acquired resistance to PARP inhibition inevitability threaten the efficacy and durability of response to these drugs. Beyond PARP inhibitors, recent advances in large-scale functional genomic screens have led to the identification of a steadily growing list of genetic dependencies across the DDR landscape. This has led to a wide array of novel synthetic lethal targets and corresponding inhibitors, which hold promise to widen the application of DDR inhibitors beyond HRD and potentially address PARP inhibitor resistance. RECENT FINDINGS In this review, we describe key synthetic lethal interactions that have been identified across the DDR landscape, summarize the early phase clinical development of the most promising DDR inhibitors, and highlight relevant combinations of DDR inhibitors with chemotherapy and other novel cancer therapies, which are anticipated to make an impact in rationally selected patient populations. SUMMARY The DDR landscape holds multiple opportunities for synthetic lethal targeting with multiple novel DDR inhibitors being evaluated on early phase clinical trials. Key challenges remain in optimizing the therapeutic window of ATR and WEE1 inhibitors as monotherapy and in combination approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Y L Ngoi
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine
| | - Shannon N Westin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Division of Surgery
| | - Timothy A Yap
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine
- The Institute for Applied Cancer Science
- Khalifa Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Wei S, Yu Z, Shi R, An L, Zhang Q, Zhang Q, Zhang T, Zhang J, Wang H. GPX4 suppresses ferroptosis to promote malignant progression of endometrial carcinoma via transcriptional activation by ELK1. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:881. [PMID: 35962333 PMCID: PMC9373394 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09986-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Glutathione Peroxidase 4 (GPX4) is a key protein that inhibits ferroptosis. However, its biological regulation and mechanism in endometrial cancer (EC) have not been reported in detail. Methods The expression of GPX4 in EC tissues was determined by TCGA databases, qRT-PCR, Western blot, and immunohistochemistry (IHC). The effects of GPX4 on EC cell proliferation, migration, apoptosis, and tumorigenesis were studied in vivo and in vitro. In addition, ETS Transcription Factor ELK1 (ELK1) was identified by bioinformatics methods, dual-luciferase reporter assay, and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate the association between ELK1 and GPX4 expression. Results The expression of GPX4 was significantly up-regulated in EC tissues and cell lines. Silencing GPX4 significantly inhibited the proliferation, migration ability, induced apoptosis, and arrested the cell cycle of Ishikawa and KLE cells. Knockdown of GPX4 accumulated intracellular ferrous iron and ROS, disrupted MMP, and increased MDA levels. The xenograft tumor model also showed that GPX4 knockdown markedly reduced tumor growth in mice. Mechanically, ELK1 could bind to the promoter of GPX4 to promote its transcription. In addition, the expression of ELK1 in EC was positively correlated with GPX4. Rescue experiments confirmed that GPX4 knockdown could reverse the strengthens of cell proliferation and migration ability and the lower level of Fe2+ and MDA caused by upregulating ELK1. Conclusion The results of the present study suggest that ELK1 / GPX4 axis plays an important role in the progress of EC by promoting the malignant biological behavior and inducing ferroptosis of EC cells, which provides evidence for investigating the potential therapeutic strategies of endometrial cancer. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09986-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sitian Wei
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhicheng Yu
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China
| | - Rui Shi
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China
| | - Lanfen An
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China
| | - Qi Zhang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China
| | - Qian Zhang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China
| | - Tangansu Zhang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
| | - Hongbo Wang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Guo XM, Roman LD, Klar M, Wright JD, Matsuo K. Malignant peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer: a contemporary review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2022; 22:947-955. [PMID: 35862462 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2022.2105208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION : In endometrial cancer, malignant peritoneal cytology (MPC) refers to the presence of tumor cells in the peritoneal cytologic specimen obtained at hysterectomy. MPC was once a component of uterine cancer staging criteria, but it is no longer included in the current revision. Multiple societies and organizations, however, continue to recommend peritoneal cytologic testing at the time of hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. AREAS COVERED This contemporary review provides a clinical summary of recent studies evaluating MPC, including risk factors and prognosis. Compared to prior studies showing a lack of impact on oncologic outcome, recent studies have larger sample sizes, use stricter inclusion criteria, and perform histology/cancer stage-specific analyses to balance risk factors and provide explicit interpretations for oncologic outcomes related to MPC. These newer data provide evidence that MPC does have a prognostic impact. EXPERT OPINION Three key domains related to MPC are followings: First, recognition of MPC as a prognostic factor for endometrial cancer irrespective to stage (early and advanced) and histology (endometrioid and non-endometrioid) is necessary. Second, peritoneal cytologic testing at the beginning of each staging surgery is recommended. Last, incorporation of peritoneal cytology status in adjuvant treatment algorithms is useful and merits further development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Mona Guo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Maximilian Klar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jason D Wright
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Bogani G, Palaia I, Perniola G, Fracassi A, Cuccu I, Golia D'Auge T, Casorelli A, Santangelo G, Fischetti M, Muzii L, Benedetti Panici P, Di Donato V. Assessing the role of low volume disease in endometrial cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022; 274:68-72. [PMID: 35598492 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The role of retroperitoneal staging in endometrial cancer is still unclear. Although the prognostic value of lymphadenectomy has been demonstrated no data support the therapeutic value of nodal dissection. Sentinel node mapping represents an evolution of lymphadenectomy. Sentinel node mapping allows a more accurate identification of low-volume diseases (i.e., micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells) that are not always detectable via conventional histopathological evaluation. Adjuvant therapy might play a role in patients with low-volume disease. However, the presence of isolated tumor cells alone seems to not impact outcomes of endometrioid endometrial cancer patients. Hence, the choice to deliver adjuvant therapies has to be tailored based on uterine factors only. The introduction of molecular and genomic profiling would be useful in selecting appropriate surgical and adjuvant treatments. The molecular-integrated risk profile should be integrated in clinical practice to overcome the need of retroperitoneal staging (in case of non-bulky nodes) in patients at low risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
| | - Innocenza Palaia
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgia Perniola
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Alice Fracassi
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Cuccu
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Tullio Golia D'Auge
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Assunta Casorelli
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Giusi Santangelo
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Margherita Fischetti
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Violante Di Donato
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Zhou H, Lai KF, Xiang Q, Xu Y, Zhang QW, Hu C, Mao XG, Chen C, Huang W, Mi GS, Shen J, Tian Y, Ke FM. Oncological Safety of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy for Apparent Early-Stage Type II Endometrial Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:918693. [PMID: 35814398 PMCID: PMC9259840 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.918693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveTo study the oncological safety of diagnostic hysteroscopy for women with apparent early-stage type II endometrial cancer.Patients and MethodsA total of 429 women with presumed early-stage type II endometrial cancer were included. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test among patients diagnosed by Dilation & Curettage (D&C) or diagnostic hysteroscopy. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was employed to adjust for potential confounding factors.Results160 cases underwent D&C and 269 cases were diagnosed by diagnostic hysteroscopy. The 5-year DFS rate was 72.17% in the diagnostic hysteroscopy group and 76.16% in the D&C group, diagnostic hysteroscopy was not associated with deteriorated 5-year DFS rate (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.84-1.86, P=0.281). The 5-year OS rate was 67.23% in the diagnostic hysteroscopy group and 70.71% in the D&C group, diagnostic hysteroscopy did not increase the risk of all-cause death (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.78-1.57, P=0.573). Multivariable analysis showed that the method of endometrial sampling was not independently associated with DFS (aHR 1.38, 95% CI 0.92-2.07, P=0.122) and OS (aHR 1.23, 95% CI 0.85-1.77, P=0.272).ConclusionFor apparent early-stage type II endometrial cancer, endometrial sampling by diagnostic hysteroscopy was as safe as D&C.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Zhou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu 363 Hospital Affiliated of Southwest Medical University, Chengdu, China
- *Correspondence: Hui Zhou,
| | - Kai-Fa Lai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu 363 Hospital Affiliated of Southwest Medical University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qian Xiang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu 363 Hospital Affiliated of Southwest Medical University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yu Xu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qian-Wen Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Cui Hu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Xi-Guang Mao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Cheng Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
| | - Wu Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
| | - Gong-Sheng Mi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, China
| | - Juan Shen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, China
| | - Yong Tian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Enshi Clinical College of Wuhan University, Enshi, China
| | - Feng-Mei Ke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Enshi Clinical College of Wuhan University, Enshi, China
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Bogani G, Di Donato V, Papadia A, Buda A, Casarin J, Multinu F, Plotti F, Cuccu I, D'Auge TG, Gasparri ML, Pinelli C, Perrone AM, Barra F, Sorbi F, Cromi A, Di Martino G, Palaia I, Perniola G, Ferrero S, De Iaco P, Perrone C, Angioli R, Luvero D, Muzii L, Ghezzi F, Landoni F, Mueller MD, Benedetti Panici P, Raspagliesi F. Evaluating long-term outcomes of three approaches to retroperitoneal staging in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 166:277-283. [PMID: 35725656 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sentinel lymph node mapping (SNM) has gained popularity in managing apparent early-stage endometrial cancer (EC). Here, we evaluated the long-term survival of three different approaches of nodal assessment. METHODS This is a multi-institutional retrospective study evaluating long-term outcomes of EC patients having nodal assessment between 01/01/2006 and 12/31/2016. In order to reduce possible confounding factors, we applied a propensity-matched algorithm. RESULTS Overall, 940 patients meeting inclusion criteria were included in the study, of which 174 (18.5%), 187 (19.9%), and 579 (61.6%) underwent SNM, SNM followed by backup lymphadenectomy (LND) and LND alone, respectively. Applying a propensity score matching algorithm (1:1:2) we selected 500 patients, including 125 SNM, 125 SNM/backup LND, and 250 LND. Baseline characteristics of the study population were similar between groups. The prevalence of nodal disease was 14%, 16%, and 12% in patients having SNM, SNM/backup LND and LND, respectively. Overall, 19 (7.6%) patients were diagnosed with low volume nodal disease. The survival analysis comparing the three techniques did not show statistical differences in terms of disease-free (p = 0.750) and overall survival (p = 0.899). Similarly, the type of nodal assessment did not impact survival outcomes after stratification based on uterine risk factors. CONCLUSION Our study highlighted that SNM provides similar long-term oncologic outcomes than LND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
| | - Violante Di Donato
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Papadia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, University' of Italian Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Alessandro Buda
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Michele e Pietro Ferrero Hospital, 12060 Verduno, Italy
| | - Jvan Casarin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Francesco Multinu
- Division of Gynecologic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Plotti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Cuccu
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Tullio Golia D'Auge
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Gasparri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, University' of Italian Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Ciro Pinelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Anna Myriam Perrone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sant'Orsola Malpighi University, Hospital University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Fabio Barra
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genova, Italy
| | - Flavia Sorbi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Antonella Cromi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Di Martino
- Gynecology Oncology Surgical Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Innocenza Palaia
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgia Perniola
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Simone Ferrero
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genova, Italy
| | - Pierandrea De Iaco
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sant'Orsola Malpighi University, Hospital University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Chiara Perrone
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Angioli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Luvero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Fabio Landoni
- Gynecology Oncology Surgical Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Michael D Mueller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Francesco Raspagliesi
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Buckingham L, Hao T, O’Donnell J, Zhao Z, Zhang X, Fan Y, Sun W, Zhang Y, Suo H, Secord AA, Zhou C, Bae-Jump V. Ipatasertib, an oral AKT inhibitor, inhibits cell proliferation and migration, and induces apoptosis in serous endometrial cancer. Am J Cancer Res 2022; 12:2850-2862. [PMID: 35812065 PMCID: PMC9251705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Ipatasertib (IPAT) is an orally administered, selective protein kinase B (AKT) inhibitor with promising data in solid tumors in both pre-clinical studies and clinical trials. Given that the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is frequently dysregulated in uterine serous carcinoma (USC), we aimed to explore the functional impact of IPAT on anti-tumorigenic activity in USC cell lines and primary cultures of USC. We found that IPAT significantly inhibited cell proliferation and colony formation in a dose-dependent manner in USC cells. Induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis was observed in IPAT-treated ARK1 and SPEC-2 cells. Treatment with IPAT resulted in reduced adhesion and invasion of both cell lines with a concomitant decrease in the expression of Snail, Slug, and N-Cadherin. Compared with single-drug treatment, the combination of IPAT and paclitaxel synergistically reduced cell proliferation and increased the activity of cleaved caspase 3 in both cell lines. Additionally, IPAT inhibited growth in four of five primary USC cultures, and three of five primary cultures also exhibited synergistic growth inhibition when paclitaxel and IPAT were combined. These results support that IPAT appears to be a promising targeted agent in the treatment of USC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey Buckingham
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Tianran Hao
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jillian O’Donnell
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ziyi Zhao
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC, USA,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalBeijing, China
| | - Xin Zhang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC, USA,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalBeijing, China
| | - Yali Fan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC, USA,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalBeijing, China
| | - Wenchuan Sun
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Yingao Zhang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Hongyan Suo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC, USA,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalBeijing, China
| | - Angeles Alvarez Secord
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke UniversityDurham, NC, USA
| | - Chunxiao Zhou
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC, USA,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Victoria Bae-Jump
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC, USA,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Hu C, Mao XG, Xu Y, Xu H, Liu Y. Oncological safety of laparoscopic surgery for women with apparent early-stage uterine clear cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2022; 29:968-975. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
68
|
Bogani G, Chiappa V, Bini M, Ronzulli D, Indini A, Conca E, Raspagliesi F. BYL719 (alpelisib) for the treatment of PIK3CA-mutated, recurrent/advanced cervical cancer. TUMORI JOURNAL 2022; 109:244-248. [PMID: 35311394 DOI: 10.1177/03008916211073621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Advanced/recurrent cervical cancer has limited therapeutic options, with a median progression-free survival after the failure of systemic treatments ranging between 3.5 and 4.5 months. Here, we reported our preliminary experience in the use of BYL719 (alpelisib) in advanced/recurrent cervical cancer after failure of at least 2 lines of treatment. The Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano approved this investigation. METHODS From April 2020 to September 2020, 17 consecutive patients with recurrent cervical cancer had Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). Of these, six patients harboring the PIK3CA mutation were included in the study. All patients had been treated with at least 2 previous lines of systemic treatment: 3 patients received >2 prior lines of treatment in the recurrent or metastatic setting; 60% had received prior bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy. All patients started alpelisib at the daily dosage of 300 mg. RESULTS Investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 33%. The disease control rate (DCR) was 100%. According to RECIST 1.1, two patients had a partial response (PR), and four patients had stable disease (SD). No complete response was observed. The mean duration of response (DOR) was 11.5 (SD 3.75) months; five patients had PR lasting for >9 months. One patient stopped the treatment at 0.82 months due to the onset of a grade 2 adverse event (AE) (skin rash). Grade 3 treatment-related AEs included: lymphoedema (n = 1, 17%) and rash (n = 1, 17%). No treatment-related grade 4-5 AEs occurred. CONCLUSIONS Our preliminary data highlighted a high level of efficacy in this setting of patients. Further trials are needed to assess the safety and effectiveness of alpelisib in PIK3CA-mutated recurrent/advanced cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Chiappa
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Bini
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Dominique Ronzulli
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alice Indini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, ASST dei Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy
| | - Elena Conca
- Pathology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Raspagliesi
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Stover EH, Xiong N, Myers AP, Tayob N, Engvold V, Polak M, Broaddus RR, Makker V, Drapkin R, Liu JF, Horowitz NS, Meric-Bernstam F, Aghajanian C, Coleman RL, Mills GB, Cantley LC, Matulonis UA, Westin SN, Konstantinopoulos PA. A phase II study of MK-2206, an AKT inhibitor, in uterine serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2022; 40:100974. [PMID: 35434236 PMCID: PMC9011027 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.100974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
70
|
Mutlu L, Harold J, Tymon-Rosario J, Santin AD. Immune checkpoint inhibitors for recurrent endometrial cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2022; 22:249-258. [PMID: 35176955 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2022.2044311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy. Outcomes for patients with advanced and/or recurrent disease have been modest with the use of chemotherapy. The approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1 have recently revolutionized human cancer treatment. Recent trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors used alone or in combination with other agents, have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in the treatment of the all-comers EC patient population. AREAS COVERED In this article, we review major clinical trials on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced and recurrent EC and discuss the response rates to these agents in the context of their genomic background. EXPERT OPINION Immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly changed our approach to the treatment of advanced/recurrent EC. Single agent anti-PD-1 regimens are highly effective in MMRd/MSI-H patients, but their clinical efficacy remains modest in MMR proficient/TMB low EC patients. Combination regimens that can decrease the tumor microenvironments immunosuppression and increase tumor immunogenicity represent a viable treatment option to broaden the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced/recurrent EC patients. An increased understanding of the biomarkers of response and the molecular mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors remains key for the next advancement of the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Levent Mutlu
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Smilow Cancer Hospital, Yale University, School of Medicine
| | - Justin Harold
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Smilow Cancer Hospital, Yale University, School of Medicine
| | - Joan Tymon-Rosario
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Smilow Cancer Hospital, Yale University, School of Medicine
| | - Alessandro D Santin
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Smilow Cancer Hospital, Yale University, School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Lin DI, Fine A, Danziger NA, Huang RSP, Mata DA, Decker B, Killian JK, Ramkissoon SH, Lechpammer M, Janovitz T, Ross JS, Sokol ES, Elvin JA. Molecular analysis of endometrial serous carcinoma reveals distinct clinicopathologic and genomic subgroups. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 164:558-565. [PMID: 34998597 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Endometrial serous carcinoma (EMSC) is an aggressive variant of uterine cancer with limited therapeutic options. We sought to define distinct clinicopathologic and genomic EMSC subgroups. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 2159 EMSC and 2346 endometrioid-type endometrial carcinomas (EEC) tissue specimens that had undergone comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) via the FoundationOne CDx assay during routine clinical care. High tumor mutational burden (TMB) was defined as ≥10mut/Mb using the FDA-approved CDx cutoff for pembrolizumab. Microsatellite instability (MSI) was determined on 95 loci. Evidence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) was determined via genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH), a validated HRD detection method for predicting PARP inhibitor effectiveness in ovarian carcinoma. High gLOH was defined as ≥16%. RESULTS A genomic analysis of 2159 EMSCs revealed a predominance of TP53 mutations, microsatellite stability, low tumor mutational burden (TMB), and recurrent alterations of PIK3CA, PPP2R1A, ERBB2, CCNE1, FBXW7 and MYC. Evidence of HRD via high gLOH was identified in 22% of EMSCs. BRCA1 and BRCA2 alterations, as well as unique SET (solid, pseudo-endometrioid, and transitional cell-like) variant morphology, were enriched in HRD-EMSC. There was an increased frequency of CCNE1 amplification, a lower prevalence of PIK3CA and PPP2R1A alterations, and no differences in HRD, MSI or TMB biomarker frequencies in patients of predicted African ancestry. EMSC exhibited distinct gene mutation frequencies and MSI, TMB and gLOH biomarker signatures compared to a cohort 2346 EEC. CONCLUSIONS Molecularly defined subgroups provide a framework to test the susceptibility of EMSC to targeted therapies in specific genetic settings (e.g. HRD, PIK3CA, PPP2R1A, ERBB2, MYC, CCNE1).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas I Lin
- Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
| | - Alexander Fine
- Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | | | | | - Douglas A Mata
- Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Brennan Decker
- Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | | | - Shakti H Ramkissoon
- Foundation Medicine Inc., Morrisville, NC, United States of America; Wake Forest Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America
| | - Mirna Lechpammer
- Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Tyler Janovitz
- Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey S Ross
- Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States of America; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States of America
| | - Ethan S Sokol
- Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Julia A Elvin
- Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Hong JH, Cho HW, Ouh YT, Lee JK, Chun Y, Gim JA. Genomic landscape of advanced endometrial cancer analyzed by targeted next-generation sequencing and the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) dataset. J Gynecol Oncol 2022; 33:e29. [PMID: 35128859 PMCID: PMC9024183 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Recent studies have detailed the genomic landscape of endometrial cancer (EC); however, no study has focused on genetic alterations in advanced EC. We performed genomic profiling of patients with advanced EC using targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). Methods Archival tissue samples from 21 patients diagnosed with stage III and IV EC were obtained and subjected to NGS. Our data and the cancer genome atlas dataset were combined, and somatic mutation patterns were analyzed and compared according to the stage and histological type. Additionally, survival effects of specific mutated genes were analyzed. Results Somatic mutation patterns of 38 genes were identified in 263 EC samples, and the most commonly mutated genes were PTEN and PIK3CA. PTEN was the most common in endometrioid histology, while PPP2R1A was the most commonly mutated gene in serous histology. The mutation rates of PPP2R1A and TP53 were significantly higher in advanced EC sample than in stage I samples (22.5% vs. 4.3% [p<0.001] and 8.4% vs. 1.4% [p=0.021], respectively). Survival analysis of the total population and endometrioid subgroup revealed that patients with PPP2R1A mutations had significantly shorter survival than did those without mutations (p=0.005 and p<0.001, respectively). Conclusion PPP2R1A mutations might have a role in dismal prognosis of advanced EC. Both PPP2R1A and TP53 mutations were significantly higher in stage III/IV than in stage I EC samples. Mutated PPP2R1A and TP53 were associated with decreased survival rate. PPP2R1A and TP53 mutations might contribute to poor oncological outcomes in patients with stage III/IV EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Hwa Hong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Woong Cho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yung-Taek Ouh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Jae Kwan Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yikyeong Chun
- Department of Pathology, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong-An Gim
- Medical Science Research Center, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 164:658-666. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
74
|
Monk BJ, Smith G, Lima J, Long GH, Alam N, Nakamura H, Meulendijks D, Ghiorghiu D, Banerjee S. Real-world outcomes in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: A retrospective cohort study of US electronic health records. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 164:325-332. [PMID: 34952707 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To characterize clinical outcomes of women with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (AEC) in routine practice using electronic health records from a real-world database. METHODS Adult women diagnosed with AEC (stage III/IV, or early stage with locoregional/distant recurrence) between January 1, 2013 and September 30, 2020, inclusive, were eligible provided they received platinum-based chemotherapy at any time following diagnosis and had ≥2 clinical visits. Follow-up was from initiation of systemic treatment after advanced diagnosis (index) until March 30, 2021, last available follow-up, or death, whichever occurred first. Outcomes, by histological subtype, included Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival (OS) and time to first subsequent therapy or death (TFST). RESULTS Of the 2202 women with AEC, most were treated in a community setting (82.7%) and presented with stage III/IV disease at initial diagnosis (74.0%). The proportion with endometrioid carcinoma, uterine serous carcinoma (USC), and other AEC subtypes was 59.8%, 25.0%, and 15.2%, respectively. The most common first systemic treatment following advanced/recurrent diagnosis was platinum-based combination chemotherapy (82.0%). Median OS (95% CI) from initiation of first systemic treatment was shorter with USC (31.3 [27.7-34.3] months) and other AECs (29.4 [21.4-43.9] months) versus endometrioid carcinoma (70.8 [60.5-83.2] months). Similar results were observed for TFST. Black/African American women had worse OS and TFST than white women. CONCLUSIONS Women with AEC had poor survival outcomes, demonstrating the requirement for more effective therapies. To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive evaluation of contemporary treatment of AEC delivered in a community setting to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley J Monk
- Arizona Oncology (US Oncology Network), University of Arizona, Creighton University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| | - Gabriella Smith
- University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| | - Julianne Lima
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | | | - Naufil Alam
- AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Cambridge, UK.
| | | | | | - Dana Ghiorghiu
- Global Medicines Development, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Susana Banerjee
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Bogani G, Scambia G, Cimmino C, Fanfani F, Costantini B, Loverro M, Ferrandina G, Landoni F, Bazzurini L, Grassi T, Vitobello D, Siesto G, Perrone AM, Zanagnolo V, De Iaco P, Multinu F, Ghezzi F, Casarin J, Berretta R, Capozzi VA, Zupi E, Centini G, Pellegrino A, Corso S, Stevenazzi G, Montoli S, Boschi AC, Comerci G, Greco P, Martinello R, Sopracordevole F, Giorda G, Simoncini T, Caretto M, Sartori E, Ferrari F, Cianci A, Sarpietro G, Matarazzo MG, Zullo F, Bifulco G, Morelli M, Ferrero A, Biglia N, Barra F, Ferrero S, Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Cianci S, Chiantera V, Ercoli A, Sozzi G, Martoccia A, Schettini S, Orlando T, Cannone FG, Ettore G, Puppo A, Borghese M, Martinelli C, Muzii L, Di Donato V, Driul L, Restaino S, Bergamini A, Candotti G, Bocciolone L, Plotti F, Angioli R, Mantovani G, Ceccaroni M, Cassani C, Dominoni M, Giambanco L, Amodeo S, Leo L, Thomasset R, Raimondo D, Seracchioli R, Malzoni M, Gorlero F, Di Luca M, Busato E, Kilzie S, Dell'Acqua A, Scarfone G, Vercellini P, Petrillo M, Dessole S, Capobianco G, Ciavattini A, Delli Carpini G, Giannella L, Mereu L, Tateo S, Sorbi F, Fambrini M, Cicogna S, Romano F, Ricci G, Trojano G, et alBogani G, Scambia G, Cimmino C, Fanfani F, Costantini B, Loverro M, Ferrandina G, Landoni F, Bazzurini L, Grassi T, Vitobello D, Siesto G, Perrone AM, Zanagnolo V, De Iaco P, Multinu F, Ghezzi F, Casarin J, Berretta R, Capozzi VA, Zupi E, Centini G, Pellegrino A, Corso S, Stevenazzi G, Montoli S, Boschi AC, Comerci G, Greco P, Martinello R, Sopracordevole F, Giorda G, Simoncini T, Caretto M, Sartori E, Ferrari F, Cianci A, Sarpietro G, Matarazzo MG, Zullo F, Bifulco G, Morelli M, Ferrero A, Biglia N, Barra F, Ferrero S, Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Cianci S, Chiantera V, Ercoli A, Sozzi G, Martoccia A, Schettini S, Orlando T, Cannone FG, Ettore G, Puppo A, Borghese M, Martinelli C, Muzii L, Di Donato V, Driul L, Restaino S, Bergamini A, Candotti G, Bocciolone L, Plotti F, Angioli R, Mantovani G, Ceccaroni M, Cassani C, Dominoni M, Giambanco L, Amodeo S, Leo L, Thomasset R, Raimondo D, Seracchioli R, Malzoni M, Gorlero F, Di Luca M, Busato E, Kilzie S, Dell'Acqua A, Scarfone G, Vercellini P, Petrillo M, Dessole S, Capobianco G, Ciavattini A, Delli Carpini G, Giannella L, Mereu L, Tateo S, Sorbi F, Fambrini M, Cicogna S, Romano F, Ricci G, Trojano G, Consonni R, Cantaluppi S, Lippolis A, Tinelli R, D'Ippolito G, Aguzzoli L, Mandato VD, Palomba S, Calandra D, Rosati M, Gallo C, Surico D, Remorgida V, Ruscitto F, Beretta P, Benedetti Panici P, Raspagliesi F. Characteristics and patterns of care of endometrial cancer before and during COVID-19 pandemic. J Gynecol Oncol 2021; 33:e10. [PMID: 34910391 PMCID: PMC8728669 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e10] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has correlated with the disruption of screening activities and diagnostic assessments. Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common gynecological malignancies and it is often detected at an early stage, because it frequently produces symptoms. Here, we aim to investigate the impact of COVID-19 outbreak on patterns of presentation and treatment of EC patients. Methods This is a retrospective study involving 54 centers in Italy. We evaluated patterns of presentation and treatment of EC patients before (period 1: March 1, 2019 to February 29, 2020) and during (period 2: April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021) the COVID-19 outbreak. Results Medical records of 5,164 EC patients have been retrieved: 2,718 and 2,446 women treated in period 1 and period 2, respectively. Surgery was the mainstay of treatment in both periods (p=0.356). Nodal assessment was omitted in 689 (27.3%) and 484 (21.2%) patients treated in period 1 and 2, respectively (p<0.001). While, the prevalence of patients undergoing sentinel node mapping (with or without backup lymphadenectomy) has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic (46.7% in period 1 vs. 52.8% in period 2; p<0.001). Overall, 1,280 (50.4%) and 1,021 (44.7%) patients had no adjuvant therapy in period 1 and 2, respectively (p<0.001). Adjuvant therapy use has increased during COVID-19 pandemic (p<0.001). Conclusion Our data suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the characteristics and patterns of care of EC patients. These findings highlight the need to implement healthcare services during the pandemic. The prevalence of patients with early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) has been lower during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic than before its onset. Further evidence is needed to assess the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on survival outcomes of EC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Cimmino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Insubria, F. Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy.
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Barbara Costantini
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Loverro
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Landoni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Luca Bazzurini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Tommaso Grassi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Domenico Vitobello
- Unit of Gynecology, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Siesto
- Unit of Gynecology, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Vanna Zanagnolo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Multinu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Insubria, F. Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Jvan Casarin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Insubria, F. Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Roberto Berretta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Vito A Capozzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Errico Zupi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Gabriele Centini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Antonio Pellegrino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ASST Lecco - Ospedale Alessandro Manzoni, Lecco, Italy
| | - Silvia Corso
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ASST Lecco - Ospedale Alessandro Manzoni, Lecco, Italy
| | - Guido Stevenazzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ASST OVEST MI, Legnano (Milan) Hospital, Legnano, Italy
| | - Serena Montoli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ASST OVEST MI, Legnano (Milan) Hospital, Legnano, Italy
| | - Anna Chiara Boschi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AUSL Romagna, Ospedale "Santa Maria delle Croci", Ravenna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Comerci
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AUSL Romagna, Ospedale "Santa Maria delle Croci", Ravenna, Italy
| | - Pantaleo Greco
- Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica - Dipartimento Scienze Mediche - Università di Ferrara, Ferarra, Italy
| | - Ruby Martinello
- Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica - Dipartimento Scienze Mediche - Università di Ferrara, Ferarra, Italy
| | - Francesco Sopracordevole
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico - National Cancer Institute, Aviano, Italy
| | - Giorgio Giorda
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico - National Cancer Institute, Aviano, Italy
| | - Tommaso Simoncini
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marta Caretto
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Enrico Sartori
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Federico Ferrari
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Antonio Cianci
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Gynecological Clinic, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sarpietro
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Gynecological Clinic, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Matarazzo
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Gynecological Clinic, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Fulvio Zullo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria - Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Bifulco
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria - Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Michele Morelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AO "S.S. Annunziata", Cosenza, Italy
| | - Annamaria Ferrero
- Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Biglia
- Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Fabio Barra
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Simone Ferrero
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Cianci
- Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood "G. Barresi", University Hospital G. Martino, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Vito Chiantera
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Alfredo Ercoli
- Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood "G. Barresi", University Hospital G. Martino, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Giulio Sozzi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Angela Martoccia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AOR San Carlo, Potenza, Italy
| | - Sergio Schettini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AOR San Carlo, Potenza, Italy
| | - Teresa Orlando
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AOR San Carlo, Potenza, Italy
| | - Francesco G Cannone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ARNAS Garibaldi Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ettore
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ARNAS Garibaldi Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Andrea Puppo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ASO Santa Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Martina Borghese
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ASO Santa Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Canio Martinelli
- Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood "G. Barresi", University Hospital G. Martino, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Violante Di Donato
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenza Driul
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, University-Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Stefano Restaino
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, University-Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Alice Bergamini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Candotti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Bocciolone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Plotti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Angioli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Mantovani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecology Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, Sacred Heart Hospital Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Marcello Ceccaroni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecology Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, Sacred Heart Hospital Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Chiara Cassani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Mattia Dominoni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Laura Giambanco
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Antonio Abate Hospital, Trapani, Italy and Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Silvia Amodeo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Antonio Abate Hospital, Trapani, Italy and Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Livio Leo
- Departments of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Hopital Beauregard, AUSL Valleè d'Aoste, Aosta, Italy
| | - Raphael Thomasset
- Departments of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Hopital Beauregard, AUSL Valleè d'Aoste, Aosta, Italy
| | - Diego Raimondo
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Univeristaria di Bologna. S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Renato Seracchioli
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Univeristaria di Bologna. S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mario Malzoni
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, Avellino, Italy
| | - Franco Gorlero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, Genova, Italy
| | - Martina Di Luca
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, Genova, Italy
| | - Enrico Busato
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ospedale di Treviso, Treviso, Italy
| | - Sami Kilzie
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ospedale di Treviso, Treviso, Italy
| | - Andrea Dell'Acqua
- Gynaecology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanna Scarfone
- Gynaecology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Vercellini
- Gynaecology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Petrillo
- Gynecologic and Obstetric Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Salvatore Dessole
- Gynecologic and Obstetric Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Giampiero Capobianco
- Gynecologic and Obstetric Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Andrea Ciavattini
- Gynecologic Section, Department of Odontostomatologic and Specialized Clinical Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Delli Carpini
- Gynecologic Section, Department of Odontostomatologic and Specialized Clinical Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Luca Giannella
- Gynecologic Section, Department of Odontostomatologic and Specialized Clinical Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Liliana Mereu
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Saverio Tateo
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Flavia Sorbi
- Gynecology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Fambrini
- Gynecology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefania Cicogna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Trieste, Italy
| | - Federico Romano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Trieste, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ricci
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Trieste, Italy.,Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Trojano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Madonna delle Grazie Hospital ASM, Matera, Italy
| | | | | | - Antonio Lippolis
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Valle D'Itra Hospital, Martina Franca, Taranto, Italy
| | - Raffaele Tinelli
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Valle D'Itra Hospital, Martina Franca, Taranto, Italy
| | - Giovanni D'Ippolito
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Aguzzoli
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Vincenzo D Mandato
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Stefano Palomba
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GOM of Reggio Calabria & Magna Grcia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Davide Calandra
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University G. D'Annunzio of Chieti, Pescara, Italy
| | - Maurizio Rosati
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University G. D'Annunzio of Chieti, Pescara, Italy.,Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santo Spirito Hospital, Pescara, Italy
| | - Cinzia Gallo
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università "Magna Graecia" di Catanzaro - AO "Pugliese - Ciaccio" Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Daniela Surico
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Valentino Remorgida
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Francesco Ruscitto
- Gynecology Unit, Ospedale Valduce, Como - ASST Lariana, S. Anna, Como, Italy
| | - Paolo Beretta
- Gynecology Unit, Ospedale Valduce, Como - ASST Lariana, S. Anna, Como, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Raspagliesi
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Yuan Y, Chen Z, Cai X, He S, Li D, Zhao W. Identification of Hub Genes Correlated With Poor Prognosis for Patients With Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma by Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis and Experimental Validation. Front Oncol 2021; 11:766947. [PMID: 34868993 PMCID: PMC8639584 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.766947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma (UCEC) is one of the most common malignancies of the female genital tract and there remains a major public health problem. Although significant progress has been made in explaining the progression of UCEC, it is still warranted that molecular mechanisms underlying the tumorigenesis of UCEC are to be elucidated. The aim of the current study was to investigate key modules and hub genes related to UCEC pathogenesis, and to explore potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for UCEC. The RNA-seq dataset and corresponding clinical information for UCEC patients were obtained from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened between 23 paired UCEC tissues and adjacent non-cancerous tissues. Subsequently, the co-expression network of DEGs was determined via weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). The Blue and Brown modules were identified to be significantly positively associated with neoplasm histologic grade. The highly connected genes of the two modules were then investigated as potential key factors related to tumor differentiation. Additionally, a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network for all genes in the two modules was constructed to obtain key modules and nodes. 10 genes were identified by both WGCNA and PPI analyses, and it was shown by Kaplan-Meier curve analysis that 6 out of the 10 genes were significantly negatively related to the 5-year overall survival (OS) in patients (AURKA, BUB1, CDCA8, DLGAP5, KIF2C, TPX2). Besides, according to the DEGs from the two modules, lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA and lncRNA-TF-mRNA networks were constructed to explore the molecular mechanism of UCEC-related lncRNAs. 3 lncRNAs were identified as being significantly negatively related to the 5-year OS (AC015849.16, DUXAP8 and DGCR5), with higher expression in UCEC tissues compared to non-tumor tissues. Finally, quantitative Real-time PCR was applied to validate the expression patterns of hub genes. Cell proliferation and colony formation assays, as well as cell cycle distribution and apoptosis analysis, were performed to test the effects of representative hub genes. Altogether, this study not only promotes our understanding of the molecular mechanisms for the pathogenesis of UCEC but also identifies several promising biomarkers in UCEC development, providing potential therapeutic targets for UCEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Yuan
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhengzheng Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Xushan Cai
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Jiading District, Shanghai, China.,School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shengxiang He
- School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Dong Li
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weidong Zhao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Xu Y, Shen J, Zhang Q, He Y, Chen C, Tian Y. Oncologic safety of laparoscopic surgery for women with apparent early-stage uterine serous carcinoma: A multi-institutional retrospective cohort study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 158:162-171. [PMID: 34561857 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the long-term survival outcomes of patients with apparent early-stage uterine serous carcinoma (USC) who underwent laparoscopic staging surgery with those who underwent open surgical staging. METHODS A total of 295 patients from four Chinese teaching hospitals were included. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test among patients after laparoscopic surgery or open surgery. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to adjust for potential confounding factors. RESULTS For patients with apparent early-stage USC, laparoscopic surgery was associated with deteriorated DFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-2.93, P = 0.012), and there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups (HR 1.74, 95% CI 0.99-3.08, P = 0.056). However, after adjusting for confounding factors, the surgical approach was not an independent prognostic factor for DFS (adjusted HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.63-2.12, P = 0.636) and OS (adjusted HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.52-2.38, P = 0.794) in apparent early-stage USC. CONCLUSION For apparent early-stage USC, laparoscopic surgery is safe. This needs to be confirmed by future prospective clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Xu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Ministry of Education), Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China Medical Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Juan Shen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, China
| | - Qianwen Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Ministry of Education), Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yuedong He
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Ministry of Education), Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Cheng Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
| | - Yong Tian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Enshi Clinical College of Wuhan University, Enshi, China
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Pre-treatment risk assessment of women with endometrial cancer: differences in outcomes of molecular and clinical classifications in the Slovenian patient cohort. Radiol Oncol 2021; 56:76-82. [PMID: 34529911 PMCID: PMC8884849 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2021-0036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in prognostic risk profiles of women with endometrial cancer by comparing the clinical risk assessment with the integrated molecular risk assessment profiling. Patients and methods This prospective study recruited patients with biopsy proven endometrial cancer treated at the University Medical Centre Maribor between January 2020 to February 2021. Patient clinical data was assessed and categorized according to the currently valid European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology, and European Society of Pathology (ESGO/ESTRO/ESP) guidelines on endometrial cancer. Molecular tumour characterization included determination of exonuclease domain of DNA polymerase-epsilon (POLE) mutational status by Sanger sequencing and imunohistochemical specimen evaluation on the presence of mismatch repair deficiencies (MMRd) and p53 abnormalities (p53abn). Results Fourty-five women were included in the study. Twenty-two tumours were of non-specific mutational profile (NSMP) (56.4%), 13 were classified as MMRd (33.3%), 3 were classified as p53abn (7.7%) and 1 was classified as POLE mutated (2.6%). Six tumours (15.4%) had multiple molecular classifiers, these were studied separately and were not included in the risk assessment. The clinical risk-assessment classified 21 women (53.8%) as low-risk, 5 women (12.8%) as intermediate risk, 2 women as high-intermediate risk (5.1%), 10 women (25.6%) as high risk and 1 patient as advanced metastatic (2.6%). The integrated molecular classification changed risk for 4 women (10.3%). Conclusions Integrated molecular risk improves personalized risk assessment in endometrial cancer and could potentially improve therapeutic precision. Further molecular stratification with biomarkers is especially needed in the NSMP group to improve personalized risk-assessment.
Collapse
|