Radiosurgery for re-irradiation of brain metastasis: results in 54 patients

Multidisciplinary management of brain metastases

Metastatic brain tumors are the most common intracranial neoplasms in adults. The incidence of brain metastases appears to be rising as a result of superior imaging modalities, earlier detection, and more effective treatment of systemic disease. Therapeutic approaches to brain metastases include surgery, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and chemotherapy. Treatment decisions must take into account clinical prognostic factors in order to maximize survival and neurologic function whilst avoiding unnecessary treatments. The goal of this article is to review important prognostic factors that may guide treatment selection, discuss the roles of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with brain metastases, and present new directions in brain metastasis therapy under active investigation. In the future, patients will benefit from a multidisciplinary approach focused on the integration of surgical, radiation, and chemotherapeutic options with the goal of prolonging survival, preserving neurologic and neurocognitive function, and maximizing quality of life.

Outcome After Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases in Patients With Low Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) Scores

PURPOSE

The objective of this retrospective study was evaluation of the outcome after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with intracranial metastases and poor performance status.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty consecutive patients with metastatic brain tumors and Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) scores < or =50 (mean, 43 +/- 8; median, 40) treated with SRS were analyzed. Poor performance status was caused by presence of intracranial metastases in 28 cases (70%) and resulted from uncontrolled extracerebral disease in 12 (30%).

RESULTS

Survival after SRS varied from 3 days to 11.5 months (mean, 3.8 +/- 2.9 months; median, 3.3 months). Survival probability constituted 0.50 +/- 0.07 at 3 months and 0.20 +/- 0.05 at 6 months posttreatment. Cause of low KPS score (p = 0.0173) and presence of distant metastases beside the brain (p = 0.0308) showed statistically significant associations with overall survival in multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Median survival was 6.0 months if low KPS score was caused by cerebral disease and distant metastases in regions beyond the brain were absent, 3.3 months if low KPS score was caused by cerebral disease and distant metastases in regions beyond the brain were present, and 1.0 month if poor performance status resulted from extracerebral disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Identification of the cause of low KPS score (cerebral vs. extracerebral) in patients with metastatic brain tumor(s) may be important for prediction of the outcome after radiosurgical treatment. If poor patient performance status without surgical indications is caused by intracranial tumor(s), SRS may be a reasonable treatment option.

Intensified local treatment and systemic therapy significantly increase survival in patients with brain metastases from advanced breast cancer - a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases have evolved from a rare to a frequently encountered event in advanced breast cancer due to advances in palliative systemic treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All Patients treated at our centre from 1994 to 2004 with WBRT for brain metastases from breast cancer were included. We performed a multivariate analysis (Cox regression) to explore which factors are able to influence significantly cerebral time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (metastatic sites [visceral versus non-visceral], Karnofsky performance score [KPS], age, intensified local treatment [boost irradiation, neuro-surgical resection] further systemic treatment).

RESULTS

Overall 174 patients, median age 51 years, range 27-76 years, were included. Median TTP was 3 months (m), range 1-33+ m. Median overall survival was 7 m, range 1-44 m. Factors significantly influencing TTP were KPS (p = 0.002), intensified local treatment (p < 0.001), and palliative systemic treatment (p = 0.001). Factors significantly influencing survival were intensified local treatment (p = 0.004), metastatic sites (p = 0.008), KPS (p = 0.006), and palliative systemic treatment (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

As shown by the significant influence of metastatic sites, some patients die from their advanced systemic tumour situation before they would die from cerebral progression. In other individuals however, intensified local treatment and systemic treatment appear to influence cerebral time to progression and overall survival.

Linac stereotactic radiosurgery: An effective and safe treatment for elderly patients with brain metastases

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of radiosurgery for brain metastases in patients 65 years or older.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1994 and January 2003, 117 patients (47 women, 70 men), median age 71 years (range, 65-86 years), received radiosurgery for 227 metastases. Sixty-one patients (55%) presented symptoms in relation to the brain metastases. Thirty-eight patients (32%) received whole-brain radiotherapy. Median metastasis diameter and volume were 21 mm (range, 0.5-75 mm) and 1.7 cc (range, 0.02-71 cc), respectively.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 7 months (range, 1-45 months), 9.5 months for alive patients (range, 1-45 months). Median minimum and maximum doses were 14.5 Gy (6.5 Gy, 19.5 Gy), and 20.4 Gy (13.2 Gy, 41.9 Gy), respectively. Median survival was 8 months from the date of radiosurgery. Overall survival rates at 6 and 24 months were 58% +/- 5% and 13% +/- 4%, respectively. According to multivariate analysis, a low Karnofsky performance status was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for overall survival (p = 0.003; odds ratio [OR] = 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.56). Median brain disease-free survival was 10 months. Brain disease-free survival rates at 6 and 24 months were 67% +/- 6% and 40% +/- 7%, respectively. According to multivariate analysis, a radiosensitive lesion was an independent favorable factor (p = 0.038; OR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-0.95); more than two metastases and a low Karnofsky performance status were independent unfavorable factors for brain disease-free survival (p = 0.046; OR = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.01-4.58 and p = 0.003; OR = 30.4; 95% CI, 3.1-296, respectively). Local control rates were 98% +/- 2% and 91% +/- 8.5% at 6 and 24 months. Out of the 61 patients presenting symptoms before radiosurgery, complete symptomatic response was achieved in 12 patients (20%), partial improvement in 25 (41%), stabilization in 7 (11%), and worsening in 4 (6%) related to a progression of the irradiated metastasis. Seven cases of radionecrosis were described and were related to the margin dose (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Radiosurgery for elderly patients was effective and safe. Age alone should not be a criterion for denying radiosurgery to any patient with brain metastases.

The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based review of the role of radiosurgery for brain metastases

PURPOSE

To systematically review the evidence for the use of stereotactic radiosurgery in adult patients with brain metastases.

METHODS

Key clinical questions to be addressed in this evidence-based review were identified. Outcomes considered were overall survival, quality of life or symptom control, brain tumor control or response and toxicity. MEDLINE (1990-2004 June Week 2), CANCERLIT (1990-2003), CINAHL (1990-2004 June Week 2), EMBASE (1990-2004 Week 25), and the Cochrane library (2004 issue 2) databases were searched using OVID. In addition, the Physician Data Query clinical trials database, the proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (1997-2004), ASTRO (1997-2004), and the European Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) (1997-2003) were searched. Data from the literature search were reviewed and tabulated. This process included an assessment of the level of evidence.

RESULTS

For patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases, managed with whole-brain radiotherapy alone vs. whole-brain radiotherapy and radiosurgery boost, there were three randomized controlled trials, zero prospective studies, and seven retrospective series (which satisfied inclusion criteria). For patients with up to three (<4 cm) newly diagnosed brain metastases (and in one study up to four brain metastases), radiosurgery boost with whole-brain radiotherapy significantly improves local brain control rates as compared with whole-brain radiotherapy alone (Level I-III evidence). In one large randomized trial, survival benefit with whole-brain radiotherapy was observed in patients with single brain metastasis. In this trial, an overall increased ability to taper down on steroid dose and an improvement in Karnofsky performance status was seen in patients who were treated with radiosurgery boost as compared with patients treated with whole-brain radiotherapy alone. However, Level I evidence regarding overall quality of life outcomes using a validated instrument has not been reported. All randomized trials showed improved local control with the addition of radiosurgery to whole-brain radiotherapy. For patients with multiple brain metastases, there is no overall survival benefit with the use of radiosurgery boost to whole-brain radiotherapy (Level I-III evidence). Radiosurgery boost is associated with a small risk of early or late toxicity. In patients treated with radiosurgery alone (withholding whole-brain radiotherapy) as initial treatment, there were 2 randomized trials, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 16 retrospective series. There is Level I to Level III evidence that the use of radiosurgery alone does not alter survival as compared to the use of whole-brain radiotherapy. However, there is Level I to Level III evidence that omission of whole-brain radiotherapy results in poorer intracranial disease control, both local and distant (defined as remaining brain, outside the radiosurgery field). Quality of life outcomes have not been adequately reported. Radiosurgery is associated with a small risk of early or late toxicity. Radiosurgery as salvage for patients with brain metastases was reported in zero randomized trials, one prospective study, and seven retrospective series.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on Level I-III evidence, for selected patients with small (up to 4 cm) brain metastases (up to three in number and four in one randomized trial), the addition of radiosurgery boost to whole-brain radiotherapy improves brain control as compared with whole-brain radiotherapy alone. In patients with a single brain metastasis, radiosurgery boost with whole-brain radiotherapy improves survival. There is a small risk of toxicity associated with radiosurgery boost as compared with whole-brain radiotherapy alone. In selected patients treated with radiosurgery alone for newly diagnosed brain metastases, overall survival is not altered. However, local and distant brain control is significantly poorer with omission of upfront whole-brain radiotherapy (Level I-III evidence). Whether neurocognition or quality of life outcomes are different between initial radiosurgery alone vs. whole-brain radiotherapy (with or without radiosurgery boost) is unknown, because this has not been adequately tested. There was no statistically significant difference in overall toxicity between those treated with radiosurgery alone vs. whole-brain radiotherapy and radiosurgery boost based on an interim report from one randomized study. There is insufficient evidence as to the clinical benefit/risks radiosurgery used in the setting of recurrent or progressive brain metastases, although radiographic responses are well-documented.

Isolated hypoglycorrachia: leptomeningeal carcinomatosis causing subacute confusion

We report a 76-year-old caucasian man who presented with a 3-week history of progressive confusion. His past medical history included a left nephro-uretectomy for poorly differentiated transitional cell carcinoma 9 years previously. Besides his confusion, his clinical and neurological examination was unremarkable. Extensive investigation revealed only isolated hypoglycorrachia and mildly elevated CSF protein. Cerebral CT and MRI scans without contrast did not reveal any abnormalities. As his condition continued to decline, an MRI scan of the brain with gadolinium was performed which revealed extensive nodular enhancement of the surface of the cerebellum and brainstem and both temporal lobe convexities. Repeat lumbar puncture showed malignant cells in the CSF and confirmed the diagnosis of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. This case illustrates that leptomeningeal carcinomatosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of cognitive decline in the elderly, after other common aetiologies have been excluded. The index of suspicion should be increased in patients with a prior history of cancer.

Resection of brain metastases previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery

Object. To date, no report has been published on outcomes of patients undergoing resection for brain metastases who were previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Consequently, the authors reviewed their institutional experience with this clinical scenario to assess the efficacy of surgical intervention.

Methods. Sixty-one patients (each harboring three or fewer brain lesions), who were treated at a single institution between June 1993 and August 2002 were identified. Patient charts and their neuroimaging and pathological reports were retrospectively reviewed to determine overall survival rates, surgical complications, and recurrence rates.

A univariate analysis revealed that patient preoperative recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification, primary disease status, preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale score, type of focal treatment undergone for nonindex lesions, and major postoperative surgical complications were factors that significantly affected survival (p ≤ 0.05). In contrast, only the RPA class and focal (conventional surgery or SRS) treatment of nonindex lesions significantly (or nearly significantly) affected survival in the multivariate analysis. Major neurological complications occurred in only 2% of patients. The median time to distant recurrence after resection was 8.4 months; that to local recurrence was not reached. The overall median survival time was 11.1 months, with 25% of patients surviving 2 or more years. Conventional surgery facilitated tapering of steroid administration.

Conclusions. The complication, morbidity, survival, and recurrence rates are consistent with those seen after conventional surgery for recurrent brain metastases. Our results indicate that in selected patients with a favorable RPA class in whom nonindex lesions are treated with focal modalities, surgery can provide long-term control of SRS-treated lesions and positively affect overall survival.

Gamma knife surgery for brain metastases from lung cancer

Object. The authors conducted a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gamma knife surgery (GKS) for the treatment of brain metastases from lung cancer.

Methods. Between February 1993 and May 2003 191 patients underwent treatment for 424 brain metastases from non—small (171 cases) and small cell lung carcinoma (20 cases). Imaging and clinical status were monitored every 3 months following the treatment. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, Cox proportional hazards regression for risk factor analysis, and nonparametric methods for evaluating tumor response were used.

There was no difference in median survival following combined whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and gamma knife surgery (14 months) and GKS alone (15 months). There was also no difference between the median survival rates for either tumor type. In the multivariate analysis, age less than 65 years, Karnofsky Performance Scale score greater than 70, normal neurological status, multiple GKS treatments, and pre-GKS craniotomy were related to longer survival.

Tumor control rates varied according to the volume of the metastases and were as follows: 84.4% (< 0.5 cm3), 94% (0.5–2 cm3), 89.1% (2–4 cm3), 93.4% (4–8 cm3), 85.7% (8–14 cm3), and 87.5% (> 14 cm3). Four lesions required post-GKS craniotomy due to swelling or rapid tumor progression. The rate of tumor shrinkage was higher when a volume was 2 cm3, lower in cystic lesions, lower in tumors with previous WBRT, and lower for margin doses less than 14 Gy.

Conclusions. The risk—benefit ratio of GKS in this series was satisfactory. There was no difference in response rates of the two tumor types, and WBRT did not improve the duration of survival.

Gamma knife surgery for brain metastases from lung cancer

OBJECT

The authors conducted a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gamma knife surgery (GKS) for the treatment of brain metastases from lung cancer.

METHODS

Between February 1993 and May 2003 191 patients underwent treatment for 424 brain metastases from non-small (171 cases) and small cell lung carcinoma (20 cases). Imaging and clinical status were monitored every 3 months following the treatment. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, Cox proportional hazards regression for risk factor analysis, and nonparametric methods for evaluating tumor response were used. There was no difference in median survival following combined whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and gamma knife surgery (14 months) and GKS alone (15 months). There was also no difference between the median survival rates for either tumor type. In the multivariate analysis, age less than 65 years, Karnofsky Performance Scale score greater than 70, normal neurological status, multiple GKS treatments, and pre-GKS craniotomy were related to longer survival. Tumor control rates varied according to the volume of the metastases and were as follows: 84.4% (< 0.5 cm3), 94% (0.5-2 cm3), 89.1% (2-4 cm3), 93.4% (4-8 cm3), 85.7% (8-14 cm3), and 87.5% (> 14 cm3). Four lesions required post-GKS craniotomy due to swelling or rapid tumor progression. The rate of tumor shrinkage was higher when a volume was 2 cm3, lower in cystic lesions, lower in tumors with previous WBRT, and lower for margin doses less than 14 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk-benefit ratio of GKS in this series was satisfactory. There was no difference in response rates of the two tumor types, and WBRT did not improve the duration of survival.

The pathogenesis and treatment of brain metastases: a comprehensive review

Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumors and their incidence is increasing. Untreated brain metastases are associated with a poor prognosis and a poor performance status. The role of surgery in the management of multiple brain metastases is still controversial. As more than 70% of patients have multiple metastases at the time of diagnosis, whole brain radiotherapy is the treatment of choice in most cases. Brain metastases are an ideal target for stereotactic radiosurgery, as they are better circumscribed than primary brain tumors. Currently, chemotherapy has a limited role in the treatment of most brain metastases. Several new therapies, with a good penetration through the blood brain barrier, such as temozolomide, have been used in brain metastases with different results depending on the histology of the primary tumor. A better understanding of the complex processes underlying the development of brain metastasis will enable us to develop more satisfactory targeted treatments.

Linear Accelerator Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Brain Metastases

OBJECTIVE:

To review a 12-year experience treating metastatic brain disease with linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients treated between 1989 and 2001 with linear accelerator radiosurgery for brain metastases. Patients were followed up both clinically and with imaging studies to document local control, regional control, and survival. Demographic data, dosing parameters, number of lesions, histology, history of whole-brain radiation therapy, and other factors were obtained prospectively. Cox proportional-hazards regression with multivariate and univariate analysis was performed with Stata 8.0 software.

RESULTS:

A total of 383 patients received SRS for brain metastases during the study interval. Median survival was 9 months. Patients with tumor-type melanoma or multiple metastatic lesions had decreased survival. Actuarial 1-year local control was 75%. Differences in regional control rates were not statistically significant between patients treated with SRS and whole-brain radiation therapy versus SRS alone.

CONCLUSION:

Radiosurgery is an effective and safe method for treating selected patients with brain metastases.

Résultats de l’irradiation en conditions stéréotaxiques de rattrapage de 14 patients atteints d’un gliome de grade III ou IV

AIMS

To determine local control and overall survival rates of 14 patients treated for a grade III or IV glioma relapsing in a previously irradiated area and re-irradiated by stereotactic radiosurgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1997 to October 2001, 14 patients (median age 52 Years, age range 49-58 Years, Karnofski performance score 80 to 100) received radiosurgery for a relapse of grade III (3 patients) and or grade IV (10 patients) malignant gliomas. Before relapse, all patients had undergone surgery and had been given with a classical radiation protocol. Median maximum diameter and Volume of the tumors were 38.5mm (24-86mm) and 7cm3 (2-35cm3), respectively.

RESULTS

Median maximal dose at the isocenter and median minimal dose at the periphery of the lesion were 21Gy (16-38Gy) and 13Gy (9-17Gy), respectively. Mean follow-up was 8.5 Months (1-29). Median overall survival was 11.6 Months; 6-Month, 1- and 2-Year overall survival rates were 85p.100, 36p.100 and 12p.100, respectively. At univariate analysis, only histological grade was a significant prognostic factor of overall survival (p=0.03). Median disease-free survival was 8.2 Months while 6-Month and 1-Year disease-free survival rates were 69p.100 and 14p.100, respectively. According to univariate analysis, histological grade (p=0.033) and minimal dose delivered at the margin of the target Volume (p=0.02) were prognostic factors for disease-free survival. Two patients developed a symptomatic radionecrosis.

CONCLUSION

Radiosurgery of relapsed primitive high-grade brain tumors is efficient and overall survival rates were encouraging.

Diagnosis and management of central nervous system metastases from breast cancer

The brain, cranial nerves, leptomeninges, spinal cord, and eye compose the central nervous system (CNS) and are at risk for the development of metastases from breast cancer. Such metastases are diagnosed on the basis of clinical suspicion and substantiated by neuroimaging, resection when indicated, and sampling of cerebrospinal fluid when leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is suspected. Treatment is aimed at palliation of symptoms and preservation of neurologic function. Historically, conventional radiation therapy has been the mainstay of palliative treatment for brain, cranial nerve, spinal cord, and ocular metastases. However, additional treatment options for brain metastases have been brought about by technological advances in surgery to resect brain metastases, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to focally irradiate metastases, both of which have been substantiated by data from randomized trials. Ongoing research is aimed at refining criteria to select which patients with brain metastases should undergo surgery and SRS and how these focal therapies should be optimally integrated with whole-brain radiotherapy. Therapy for LM must carefully balance the potential risks and perceived benefits associated with CNS-directed therapies. Despite advances in neuroimaging, surgery, and radiation therapy, novel treatments are needed to improve the effectiveness of treatments for CNS metastases, especially LM, while reducing attendant neurotoxicity.

LINAC radiosurgery for brain metastasis of renal cell carcinoma

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of stereotactic radiotherapy in the treatment of the brain metastasis of renal cell carcinoma. From 1994 to 2001, 28 patients presenting with 65 metastases of renal cell cancer were treated by radiosurgery. Median age was 55 years (35-75), and median Karnofski performance status ranges between 50 and 100. Seven patients had received whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) before radiosurgery. Twelve patients were treated by radiosurgery for 1 metastasis, 5 patients for two metastases and 6 for three, and 5 for more than three metastases. One procedure was performed in 22 patients and, 2 or 3 procedures for 6 patients. Median metastasis diameter was 19 mm (5-55 mm). Median metastasis volume was 1.28 cc (0.02-28 cc). Irradiation was delivered by linear accelerator. Median minimal dose (on the 70% isodose) was 14.7 Gy (10.8 Gy, 19.5 Gy), median maximal dose (at the isocenter) 20.5 Gy (14.3 Gy, 39.6 Gy). Median follow-up was 14 months (1-33). Two metastases progressed (3%), 2 and 12 months after radiosurgery. Overall, crude local control rate was 97% and 3-, 6- and 12-month local control rates were 98% +/- 2%, 98% +/- 2%, and 93% +/- 5%, respectively. In univariate analysis, no prognostic factor of local control was retrieved. Median brain disease-free survival was 25 months after RS. the 3-, 6- and 12-month distant brain control rates were 91% +/- 4%, 91% +/- 4%, and 70% +/- 12%, respectively. Median survival duration was 11 months. The 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-month overall survival rates were 82% +/- 7%, 67% +/- 9%, 48% +/- 10%, and 33% +/- 10%, respectively. According to univariate analysis, only site of metastasis was overall survival prognostic factor. Radiosurgery for brain metastasis of renal cell carcinoma is an effective and accurate treatment. The use of radiosurgery alone is an appropriate management strategy for many patients with brain metastasis of renal cell carcinoma. Radiosurgery is efficient even after development of new metastasis appearing after WBRT.

Linac radiosurgery for brain metastasis of melanoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of stereotactic radiotherapy in the treatment of brain metastases of melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1994 to 2001, 25 patients presenting with 61 metastases of cutaneous melanoma were treated with radiosurgery. Median age was 47 years (range: 25-73 years) and median Karnofski performance status 80 (range: 50-100). Twenty patients had one radiosurgery, 5 had two or three. Median metastasis diameter was 21 mm (range: 6-54.4 mm), and median metastasis volume was 1.7 cm(3) (range: 0.4-25.6 cm(3)). Irradiation was delivered by a linear accelerator. Median minimal dose was 14.1 Gy (range: 10-19.4 Gy), and median maximal dose was 20.5 Gy (range: 16-48 Gy).

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 12.6 months (range: 1-85 months). Five metastases progressed (9.8%), 2-12 months after radiosurgery. Three-, 6- and 12-month local control rates were 95 +/- 3, 90 +/- 5 and 84 +/- 7%, respectively. By univariate analysis, only absence of extracranial tumor was a prognostic factor of local control. Three-, 6- and 12-month brain-disease-free survival rates were 75 +/- 9, 68 +/- 11 and 38 +/- 13%, respectively. According to univariate analysis, only the Score Index for Radiosurgery in brain metastases (SIR) was a prognostic factor of brain-event-free survival (p = 0.03). Median survival was 8 months. Three-, 6- and 12-month overall survival rates were 75 +/- 9, 53 +/- 10, and 29 +/- 10%, respectively. According to univariate analysis, extracranial controlled disease status (p = 0.03), and SIR (p = 0.04) were prognostic factors for overall survival. According to multivariate analysis, none was an independent prognosticator for overall survival. Complications were minimal.

CONCLUSION

Radiosurgical treatment of brain metastases of melanoma is effective and accurate. The use of radiosurgery alone is an appropriate management strategy for many patients with brain metastases of melanoma.

Three irradiation treatment options including radiosurgery for brain metastases from primary lung cancer

PURPOSE

To determine local control and survival rates in 92 patients with 145 brain metastases treated with three options of radiotherapy including stereotactic radiosurgery (SR).

METHODS

Between July 1994 and August 2002, 92 consecutive patients with 145 metastases were treated with a SR, 34 with initially SR alone, 22 initially with an association of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and 36 with SR alone for recurrent new brain metastasis after WBRT. At time of treatment, extracranial disease was controlled in 46 (50%) and uncontrolled in 46 (50%). Pathologies were adenocarcinoma in 54 cases (59%), squamous cell carcinoma in 14 cases (15%), small cell carcinoma in 10 cases (11%) and miscellaneous in 14 cases (15%). All patients underwent only one treatment fraction for 1 or 2 metastases in 73 cases (83%) and for more than 2 metastases for the others.

RESULTS

The characteristics of patients and metastases in the group treated initially with SR alone and in the group treated initially with WBRT+SR were comparable. Median follow-up was 29 months (18-36). Overall, the median and the 1- and 2-year rates of overall survival were, respectively, 9 months, 37 and 20%. A controlled extracranial disease, a high Karnofsky index and a low number of metastasis were independent prognostic factor of overall survival, respectively, HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.31-0.90, P=0.01), HR 0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.97, P=0.0002), and HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.25-0.90, P=0.02). Thirteen metastases were not controlled (9%). Six-month and 1-year local control rate were, respectively, 93 and 86%. High delivered dose was an independent prognostic factor of local control, HR 0.41 (95% CI 0.18-0.95, P=0.03). A controlled extracranial disease was favourable independent prognostic factor of brain free-disease free survival, HR 0.47 (95% CI 0.2-0.98, P=0.04). Although there was a trend of a better local control, overall and brain disease free survivals rates in the WBRT+SR group compared to SR alone one, the difference were not statistically different.

CONCLUSION

Local control and survival rates are acceptable for a palliative treatment for the three option of treatment. In this series, the number of patients is not enough great to conclude to the necessity of the association of WBRT to SR. Re-irradiation is a safe treatment after new metastases appeared in previously irradiated area.

Radiosurgery for brain metastasis: impact of CTV on local control

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present analysis was to assess whether adding a 1 mm margin to the gross tumour volume (GTV) improves the control rate of brain metastasis treated with radiosurgery (RS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All the patients had one or two brain metastases, 30 mm or less in diameter, and only one isocentre was used for RS. There were 23 females and 38 males. The median age was 54 years (34-76). The median Karnofsky performance status was 80 (60-100). At the time of RS, 23 patients had no evidence of extracranial disease and 38 had a progressive systemic disease. Thirty-eight patients were treated up-front with only RS. Twenty-three patients were treated for relapse or progression more than 2 months after whole brain radiotherapy. From January 1994 to July 1995, clinical target volume (CTV) was equal to GTV without any margin (33 metastases). From August 1995 to August 2000, CTV was defined as GTV plus a 1 mm margin (45 metastases). A dose of 20Gy was prescribed to the isocentre and 14Gy at the margin of CTV.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 10.5 months (1-45). The mean minimum dose delivered to GTV was 14.6Gy in the group without a margin and 16.8Gy in the group with a 1 mm margin (P<0.0001). The response of 11 metastases was never assessed because patients died before the first follow-up. Ten metastases recurred, eight in the group treated without a margin and two in the group treated with a 1 mm margin (P=0.01). Two-year local control rates were 50.7+/-12.7% and 89.7+/-7.4% (P=0.008), respectively. Univariate analysis showed that the treatment group (P=0.008) and the tumour volume (P=0.009) were prognostic factors for local control. In multivariate analysis, only the treatment group with a 1 mm margin was an independent prognostic factor for local control (P=0.04, RR: 5.8, 95% CI [1.08-31.13]). There were no significant differences, either in overall survival rate or in early and late side effects, between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Adding a 1 mm margin to the GTV in patients treated with RS significantly improves the probability of metastasis control without increasing the side effects.

Brain metastases

Brain metastases are one of the most feared complications of cancer because even small tumors may cause incapacitating neurologic symptoms. This article reviews the epidemiology, clinical features, treatment, and prognosis of brain metastases from system malignancies.