Evaluation of the LENT-SOMA scales for the prospective assessment of treatment morbidity in cervical carcinoma

Assessing the impact of late treatment effects in cervical cancer: an exploratory study of women?s sexuality

Cancer survivorship has become a major issue due to people living longer with the effects of cancer treatment. A key issue in this area are the 'iatrogenic effects' of cancer treatments and their adverse impact on the quality of long-term patient survival. This paper considers the late physical effects of treatment for cervical cancer, in particular psychosocial problems associated with sexuality. The aim of this paper was to explore women's sexuality following treatment for cervical cancer. A qualitative phenomenological design was used to explore the lived experiences of a purposive sample of 13 women 2-3 years after treatment, using in-depth interviewing. The findings demonstrate that cancer treatment can result in a number of late physical effects, including bladder and bowel dysfunction. Moreover, the physical problems led to sexual difficulties experienced several years after treatment. Concerns were expressed by patients about perceived psychosexual difficulties encountered as a result of treatment. In conclusion, the study raises issues associated with the management of late treatment effects and its impact on sexuality. The findings underline the need for effective communication of possible iatrogenic effects of treatment during follow-up care and a need for research to consider the advice and information that women require about long-term treatment effects.

Pattern of failure and long-term morbidity in patients undergoing postoperative radiotherapy for cervical cancer

The objective of this study was to assess treatment outcomes in a large case series of cervical cancer patients undergoing postoperative radiotherapy in a single center. Case notes of women referred to the Christie Hospital during 1985-1997 for postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy for cervical cancer were reviewed. Of 478 women eligible for analysis, 282 (58.9%) underwent radical hysterectomy and 196 (41.1%) had nonradical hysterectomy. The disease-specific 5-year survival for the study population is 70.1%, with a 5-year risk of developing any recurrence of 30.5% and a 5-year grade 3 morbidity rate of 3.9%. Survival was significantly higher, ie, 80.9% vs 62.7% (P = 0.0001) and recurrence was significantly lower, ie, 18.6% vs 38.8% (P < 0.00005) in the group of women who had adjuvant radiotherapy following a nonradical hysterectomy compared with radical surgery. Thirty percent of women having "radical" surgery had positive resection margins and required postoperative adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy. Women with node-positive disease, who received adjuvant radiotherapy, had a high rate of distant metastases. These women would receive chemoradiotherapy now as primary treatment because of the risk of developing distant metastases. If, despite staging investigations, surgery reveals node-positive disease, then these women should receive adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Survival was better in women who had nonradical surgery due to smaller volume disease when cancers were unsuspected and hence will have been cured by surgery alone. Multidisciplinary team working, as recommended by national guidelines from 1999, should allow better patient selection for treatment.

Long-term morbidity following short-course, pre-operative radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer

AIM

Short-course pre-operative radiotherapy (SCPRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME) have been shown to reduce the rate of relapse and improve survival in patients with rectal cancer. Concerns about morbidity have limited its application in some centres. The aim of this study was to assess long-term toxicity of pre-operative RT in patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS

Permanent toxicity was assessed in 20 patients who were alive >12 months after pre-operative RT (25Gy/ 5#), using a validated LENT SOMA scoring system. Ten patients with rectal cancer who had been operated on >12 months ago, but had not received pre-operative RT were assessed similarly.

RESULTS

Patients who had received SCPRT appeared to have a significantly higher rectal toxicity, urinary and male sexual dysfunction, compared with the controls. No significant difference was noted in female sexual dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

The combination of pre-operative RT and TME appears to be associated with significant long-term toxicity. Better methods of staging the tumours may improve selection of patients for SCPRT.

A modified Inflammatory Bowel Disease questionnaire and the Vaizey Incontinence questionnaire are simple ways to identify patients with significant gastrointestinal symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy

After radiotherapy for pelvic cancer, chronic gastrointestinal problems may affect quality of life (QOL) in 6–78% of patients. This variation may be due to true differences in outcome in different diseases, and may also represent the inadequacy of the scales used to measure radiotherapy-induced gastrointestinal side effects. The aim of this study was to assess whether outcome measures used for nonmalignant gastrointestinal disease are useful to detect gastrointestinal morbidity after radiotherapy. Results obtained from a Vaizey Incontinence questionnaire and a modified Inflammatory Bowel Disease questionnaire (IBDQ) – both patient completed – were compared to those from a staff administered Late Effects on Normal Tissue (LENT) – Subjective, Objective, Management and Analytic (SOMA) questionnaire in patients who had completed radiotherapy for a pelvic tumour at least 3 months previously. In all, 142 consecutive patients were recruited, 72 male and 70 female, median age 66 years (range 26–90 years), a median of 27 (range 3–258) months after radiotherapy. In total, 62 had been treated for a gynaecological, 58, a urological and 22, a gastrointestinal tract tumour. Of these, 21 had undergone previous gastrointestinal surgery and seven suffered chronic gastrointestinal disorders preceding their diagnosis of cancer. The Vaizey questionnaire suggested that 27% patients were incontinent for solid stools, 35% for liquid stools and 37% could not defer defaecation for 15 min. The IBDQ suggested that 89% had developed a chronic change in bowel habit and this change significantly affected 49% patients: 44% had more frequent or looser bowel movements, 30% were troubled by abdominal pain, 30% were troubled by bloating, 28% complained of tenesmus, 27% were troubled by their accidental soiling and 20% had rectal bleeding. At least 34% suffered emotional distress and 22% impairment of social function because of their bowels. The small intestine/colon SOMA median score was 0.1538 (range 0–1) and the rectal SOMA median score was 0.1428 (range 0–1). Pearson's correlations for the IBDQ score and small intestine/colon SOMA score was −0.630 (P<0.001), IBDQ and rectum SOMA −0.616 (P<0.001), IBDQ and Vaizey scores −0.599 (P<0.001), Vaizey and small intestine/colon SOMA 0.452 (P<0.001) and Vaizey and rectum SOMA 0.760 (P<0.001). After radiotherapy for a tumour in the pelvis, half of all patients develop gastrointestinal morbidity, which affects their QOL. A modified IBDQ and Vaizey questionnaire are reliable in assessing new gastrointestinal symptoms as well as overall QOL and are much easier to use than LENT SOMA.

Assessment of morbidity in carcinoma of the cervix: a comparison of the LENT SOMA scales and the Franco-Italian glossary

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To assess the correlation between the LENT (late effects on normal tissue) SOMA (subjective objective management analytic) system and the Franco-Italian glossary scores of late morbidity in cervical cancer patients treated with radiation, and to compare the ability of the scoring systems to detect differences between radiation treatment groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was retrospective. Patients, invited to take part in the study, had radiotherapy for cervical cancer and had a minimum of 3 years follow-up with no evidence of recurrence. One hundred patients agreed to take part. LENT subjective data were obtained using a patient questionnaire approach in order to complete the scales as published. The LENT objective, management and Franco-Italian glossary scores were obtained by a physician. Correlations between scores and differences between treatment groups were examined using non-parametric tests.

RESULTS

The average LENT SOMA scores had a greater resolution than the maximum scores, and using the maximum score alone underestimated treatment morbidity. The Franco-Italian glossary scores correlated strongly with the LENT objective scores (rho=0.61, P<0.0005), and less strongly with the LENT subjective scores (rho=0.45, P<0.0005). Significant differences in morbidity between the radiation treatment groups were measured using both the LENT SOMA system and the Franco-Italian glossary.

CONCLUSIONS

The maximum and average LENT scores should be reported for each subsite. The LENT objective scores correlated well with the scores obtained using the established Franco-Italian glossary, but the LENT system provided additional information on subjective treatment effects. Both systems were able to measure significant differences in morbidity between radiation treatment groups. In conclusion, the LENT SOMA system is a valid and comprehensive approach for scoring the late normal tissue effects of radiotherapy.

The impact of radiotherapy for carcinoma of the cervix on sexual function assessed using the LENT SOMA scales

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

As there are few studies examining the impact of radiotherapy on sexuality, we assessed the effect of radiotherapy for carcinoma of the cervix on sexual health and the ability of the LENT system to assess sexual function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the vagina and sexual dysfunction scales of the LENT SOMA scales, subjective scores were measured prospectively before initiation of radiotherapy for 89 women, and at the following times after the start of treatment: 21, 70, 200, 400, 600 and 800 days.

RESULTS

There was considerable variation in pre-radiotherapy scores that was not related to disease stage (P=0.054), but was related to patient age (P=0.037, for the average vagina scores and P=0.039 for the maximum vagina scores) The scores were influenced by prior surgery (P<0.0005 for maximum and average vagina scores, P=0.042 average and 0.017 maximum sexual dysfunction scores). For 48 patients for whom data were available at the first three time points, the vagina scores decreased significantly by 70 days compared to pre-radiotherapy scores, but not for sexual dysfunction. There was heterogeneity in the pattern of changes of scores over time: for some women there was no change in vagina subsection score, some increased, and some decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

The work has shown variation both in pre-treatment sexual function and in the pattern of changes seen following radiotherapy. Our questionnaire proved useful to score subjective sexual and vaginal problems as given in the LENT subjective scales. Further study is needed to assess the effectiveness of the scales in assessing late effects.