1
|
Shor D, Khoo V, Jayaprakash KT. Advancing the Paradigm: Oligometastatic Disease and the Impact of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024:S0936-6555(24)00134-1. [PMID: 38631977 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- D Shor
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK.
| | - V Khoo
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - K T Jayaprakash
- Oncology Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn NHS Foundation Trust, Kings Lynn, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ratnakumaran R, van As N, Khoo V, McDonald F, Tait D, Ahmed M, Taylor H, Griffin C, Dunne EM, Tree AC. Patterns of Failure After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy to Sacral Metastases. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:339-346. [PMID: 36805131 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used to treat sacral metastases. We analysed our centre's local relapse rates and patterns of failure after sacral SBRT and assessed whether using the consensus contouring recommendation (CCR) may have prevented local relapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a single-centre retrospective review of patients treated with sacral SBRT between February 2012 and December 2021. The cumulative incidence of local relapse, patterns of failure and overall survival were determined. Two investigators reviewed planning computed tomography scans and imaging at relapse to determine if local relapse was potentially preventable with a larger CCR-derived radiotherapy field. RESULTS In total, 34 patients received sacral SBRT, with doses ranging from 24 to 40 Gy over three to five fractions. The most frequently used schedule was 30 Gy in three fractions. Common primaries treated included prostate (n = 16), breast (n = 6), lung (n = 3) and renal (n = 3) cancers. The median follow-up was 20 months (interquartile range 13-55 months). The cumulative incidence of local relapse (4/34) was 2.9% (95% confidence interval 0.2-13.2), 6.3% (95% confidence interval 1.1-18.5) and 16.8% (95% confidence interval 4.7-35.4) at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years, respectively. The patterns of failure were local-only (1/34), local and distant (3/34) and distant relapse (10/34). The overall survival was 96.7% (95% confidence interval 90.5-100) and 90.6% (95% confidence interval 78.6-100) at 1 and 2 years, respectively. For prostate/breast primaries, the cumulative incidence of local relapse was 4.5% (95% confidence interval 0.3-19.4), 4.5% (95% confidence interval 0.3-19.4) and 12.5% (95% confidence interval 1.7-34.8) at 6 months, 1 and 2 years, respectively. Twenty-nine cases (85.3%) deviated from the CCR. Sacral relapse was potentially preventable if the CCR was used in one patient (2.9% of the whole cohort and 25% of the relapsed cohort). DISCUSSION We have shown excellent local control rates with sacral SBRT, which was largely planned with a margin expansion approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Ratnakumaran
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - N van As
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - V Khoo
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - F McDonald
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - D Tait
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - M Ahmed
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - H Taylor
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - C Griffin
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, London, UK
| | - E M Dunne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer - Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A C Tree
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hafeez S, Koh M, Jones K, El Ghzal A, D'Arcy J, Kumar P, Khoo V, Lalondrelle S, McDonald F, Thompson A, Scurr E, Sohaib A, Huddart R. Assessing Bladder Radiotherapy Response With Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:630-641. [PMID: 35534398 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Radiotherapy with radiosensitisation offers opportunity for cure with organ preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Treatment response assessment and follow-up are reliant on regular endoscopic evaluation of the retained bladder. In this study we aim to determine the role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) analysis to assess bladder radiotherapy response. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with T2-T4aN0-3M0 MIBC suitable for radical radiotherapy were recruited prospectively to an ethics approved protocol. Following transurethral resection of the bladder tumour and prior to any treatment, magnetic resonance imaging including DWI was performed on a 1.5T system using b values of 0, 100, 150, 250, 500, 750 s/mm2. DWI was repeated 3 months after completing radiotherapy. Cystoscopy and tumour site biopsy were undertaken following this. The response was dichotomised into response ( RESULTS Thirty-four patients were evaluated. Response was associated with a significant increase in ΔADC mean compared with poor response at ΔADCall (0.57 × 10-3 mm2/s versus -0.01 × 10-3 mm2/s; P < 0.0001) and ΔADCb100 (0.58 × 10-3 mm2/s versus -0.10 x 10-3 mm2/s; P = 0.007). A 48.50% increase in %ΔADCall mean was seen in response compared with a 1.37% decrease in poor response (P < 0.0001). This corresponded to a %ΔADCb100 mean increase of 50.34% in response versus a 7.36% decrease for poor response (P < 0.0001). Significant area under the curve (AUC) values predictive of radiotherapy response were identified at ΔADC and %ΔADC for ADCall and ADCb100 mean, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th percentiles (AUC >0.9, P < 0.01). ΔADCall mean of 0.16 × 10-3 mm2/s and ΔADCb100 mean 0.12 × 10-3 mm2/s predicted radiotherapy response with sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive value/negative predictive value of 92.9%/100.0%/100.0%/75.0% and 89.3%/100.0%/100.0%/66.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Quantitative DWI analysis can successfully provide non-invasive assessment of bladder radiotherapy response. Multicentre validation is required before prospective testing to inform MIBC radiotherapy follow-up schedules and decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Hafeez
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - M Koh
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K Jones
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A El Ghzal
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J D'Arcy
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P Kumar
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - V Khoo
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S Lalondrelle
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - F McDonald
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Thompson
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - E Scurr
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Sohaib
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Huddart
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nicholls L, Chapman E, Khoo V, Suh YE, van As N. In Reply to Onal et al. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:e173. [PMID: 35093250 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- L Nicholls
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - E Chapman
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - V Khoo
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Y-E Suh
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - N van As
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nicholls L, Chapman E, Khoo V, Suh YE, Tunariu N, Wang Y, van As N. Metastasis-directed Therapy in Prostate Cancer: Prognostic Significance of the ESTRO/EORTC Classification in Oligometastatic Bone Disease. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 34:63-69. [PMID: 34756755 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Oligometastatic disease (OMD) represents a spectrum of clinical scenarios and various classification systems have been proposed. Bone-only OMD can occur in patients with advanced prostate cancer and validated decision-making tools are needed to assist patient selection for metastasis-directed therapy. The aim of the present study was to determine the prognostic utility of a classification system for OMD. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of all patients with bone-only oligometastatic prostate cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) since November 2011. SBRT was delivered using CyberKnife® and gantry-based linear accelerator platforms. All patients were classified into oligometastatic states based on the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (ESTRO/EORTC) classification system. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were carried out to determine the prognostic utility of this classification system. RESULTS In total, 105 patients with 145 osseous metastases were treated over 119 sessions. The median follow-up after SBRT was 23 months (interquartile range 10-39.8). Twelve patients had died after a median time of 31 months. The 3-year metastatic progression-free survival was 23% (95% confidence interval 13-32) and the 3-year overall survival was 88% (95% confidence interval 80-96). Patients in a metachronous oligometastatic state were 4.50 (95% confidence interval 1.19-17.10, P = 0.03) times more likely to experience metastatic progression compared with those with synchronous oligometastases, and 6.69 (95% confidence interval 1.05-42.50, P = 0.04) times more likely to experience any failure. Hazard ratio magnitudes increased for patients in a repeat oligometastatic state. The multivariate model for both metastatic progression-free survival and failure-free survival found prostate-specific antigen doubling time <4 months (P = 0.002; P = 0.05) to independently predict for progression. CONCLUSION The ESTRO/EORTC classification of OMD predicts for progression in patients treated with SBRT for bone-only oligometastatic prostate cancer at our institution. Further validation in prospective series over multiple tumour sites is needed. These characterisation factors should be assessed in patients considered for metastasis-directed therapy together with established prognostic features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Nicholls
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - E Chapman
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, Chelsea, London, UK
| | - V Khoo
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, Chelsea, London, UK
| | - Y-E Suh
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - N Tunariu
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, Chelsea, London, UK
| | - Y Wang
- Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - N van As
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, Chelsea, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dal Pra A, Dirix P, Khoo V, Carrie C, Cozzarini C, Fonteyne V, Ghadjar P, Gomez-Iturriaga A, Panebianco V, Zapatero A, Bossi A, Wiegel T. OC-0508 ESTRO ACROP Guideline on Prostate Bed Delineation for Postoperative Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)06934-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
7
|
Connor M, Genie M, Gonzalez M, Hosking-Jervis F, Thippu Jayaprakash K, Sarwar N, Horan G, Klimowska-Nassar N, Sukumar J, Pokrovska T, Basak D, Rai B, Robinson A, Beresford M, Mangar S, Falconer A, Dudderidge T, Khoo V, Winkler M, Watson V, Ahmed H. Metastatic prostate cancer patients’ Attitudes towards Treatment of the local Tumour and metastasis Evaluative Research (IP5-MATTER): A multicentre, discrete choice experiment trial-in-progress. Eur Urol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(21)01243-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
8
|
Villalon Arias C, Eyles H, Roberts K, Sun Y, Khoo V, Bidmead M. PO-0249 Comparison of two different Low Dose Rate (LDR) Brachytherapy techniques - a retrospective analysis. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)06408-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
9
|
Chaw CL, deSouza NM, Khoo V, Suh YE, van As N. Clinical Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy With Immediate Versus Delayed Hormone Therapy in Men With Oligometastatic Recurrence of Prostate Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:509-517. [PMID: 32423621 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Revised: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with the delayed option of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the current treatment paradigm in men relapsed with oligometastatic prostate cancer based on the outcome of a phase II randomised controlled study. The immediate (concomitant) use of ADT in this clinical setting potentially augments the efficacy of SBRT by improving systemic disease control. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of these two treatment strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty-eight patients with up to three oligometastases and controlled primary disease who had been treated using SBRT with immediate or delayed ADT were included in this retrospective analysis. Progression-free survival (PFS), widespread failure-free survival (WFFS) and freedom from further interventions (FFFI) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression methods. Toxicity was evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. RESULTS Thirty-nine patients (44.3%) were treated with SBRT and immediate ADT (continuous ADT, n = 7; intermittent ADT, n = 32) and 49 (55.7%) with SBRT and delayed ADT. The median follow-up was 24 months (interquartile range 13.5-37.0 months). PFS in the immediate and delayed ADT groups were 26 months and 16 months, respectively (P < 0.007). The median WFFS in the immediate ADT group was not reached compared with 21 months in the delayed ADT group (P = 0.025). The 1- and 2-year FFFI in the immediate ADT group were 88% and 64.1%, respectively, significantly higher than those in the delayed ADT group (63.8% and 30.2%, respectively, P < 0.002). Acute toxicities of grade 1-2 occurred in 17.9% of the immediate ADT group and 18.4% of the delayed ADT group (P = 0.96). Only one case of grade 3 late toxicity (pelvic insufficiency) was identified in this study. CONCLUSIONS SBRT with concomitant ADT improves PFS, WFFS and FFFI as compared with SBRT with delayed ADT; this finding needs validation in a prospective, randomised study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C L Chaw
- Academic Unit of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Chelsea, London, UK.
| | - N M deSouza
- Cancer Research UK Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
| | - V Khoo
- Academic Unit of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Chelsea, London, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, London, UK
| | - Y E Suh
- Academic Unit of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Chelsea, London, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, London, UK
| | - N van As
- Academic Unit of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Chelsea, London, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Horwich A, Babjuk M, Bellmunt J, Bruins HM, De Reijke TM, De Santis M, Gillessen S, James N, Maclennan S, Palou J, Powles T, Ribal MJ, Shariat SF, Van Der Kwast T, Xylinas E, Agarwal N, Arends T, Bamias A, Birtle A, Black PC, Bochner BH, Bolla M, Boormans JL, Bossi A, Briganti A, Brummelhuis I, Burger M, Castellano D, Cathomas R, Chiti A, Choudhury A, Compérat E, Crabb S, Culine S, De Bari B, DeBlok W, De Visschere PJL, Decaestecker K, Dimitropoulos K, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Fanti S, Fonteyne V, Frydenberg M, Futterer JJ, Gakis G, Geavlete B, Gontero P, Grubmüller B, Hafeez S, Hansel DE, Hartmann A, Hayne D, Henry AM, Hernandez V, Herr H, Herrmann K, Hoskin P, Huguet J, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kamat AM, Khoo V, Kiltie AE, Krege S, Ladoire S, Lara PC, Leliveld A, Linares-Espinós E, Løgager V, Lorch A, Loriot Y, Meijer R, Carmen Mir M, Moschini M, Mostafid H, Müller AC, Müller CR, N'Dow J, Necchi A, Neuzillet Y, Oddens JR, Oldenburg J, Osanto S, Oyen WJG, Pacheco-Figueiredo L, Pappot H, Patel MI, Pieters BR, Plass K, Remzi M, Retz M, Richenberg J, Rink M, Roghmann F, Rosenberg JE, Rouprêt M, Rouvière O, Salembier C, Salminen A, Sargos P, Sengupta S, Sherif A, Smeenk RJ, Smits A, Stenzl A, Thalmann GN, Tombal B, Turkbey B, Vahr Lauridsen S, Valdagni R, Van Der Heijden AG, Van Poppel H, Vartolomei MD, Veskimäe E, Vilaseca A, Vives Rivera FA, Wiegel T, Wiklund P, Williams A, Zigeuner R, Witjes JA. EAU-ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer-an international collaborative multi-stakeholder effort: under the auspices of the EAU and ESMO Guidelines Committees†. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1697-1727. [PMID: 31740927 PMCID: PMC7360152 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although guidelines exist for advanced and variant bladder cancer management, evidence is limited/conflicting in some areas and the optimal approach remains controversial. OBJECTIVE To bring together a large multidisciplinary group of experts to develop consensus statements on controversial topics in bladder cancer management. DESIGN A steering committee compiled proposed statements regarding advanced and variant bladder cancer management which were assessed by 113 experts in a Delphi survey. Statements not reaching consensus were reviewed; those prioritised were revised by a panel of 45 experts before voting during a consensus conference. SETTING Online Delphi survey and consensus conference. PARTICIPANTS The European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), experts in bladder cancer management. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Statements were ranked by experts according to their level of agreement: 1-3 (disagree), 4-6 (equivocal), 7-9 (agree). A priori (level 1) consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement and ≤15% disagreement, or vice versa. In the Delphi survey, a second analysis was restricted to stakeholder group(s) considered to have adequate expertise relating to each statement (to achieve level 2 consensus). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 116 statements were included in the Delphi survey. Of these, 33 (28%) statements achieved level 1 consensus and 49 (42%) statements achieved level 1 or 2 consensus. At the consensus conference, 22 of 27 (81%) statements achieved consensus. These consensus statements provide further guidance across a broad range of topics, including the management of variant histologies, the role/limitations of prognostic biomarkers in clinical decision making, bladder preservation strategies, modern radiotherapy techniques, the management of oligometastatic disease and the evolving role of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS These consensus statements provide further guidance on controversial topics in advanced and variant bladder cancer management until a time where further evidence is available to guide our approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Horwich
- Emeritus Professor, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Emeritus Professor, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - M Babjuk
- Depatment of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - J Bellmunt
- IMIM-Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - H M Bruins
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - T M De Reijke
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M De Santis
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Gillessen
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - N James
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
| | - S Maclennan
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - J Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Powles
- The Royal Free NHS Trust, London; Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - M J Ribal
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S F Shariat
- Depatment of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - T Van Der Kwast
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris; Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - N Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah (NCI-CCC), Salt Lake City, USA
| | - T Arends
- Urology Department, Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Dept of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A Birtle
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, Preston, UK
| | - P C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - B H Bochner
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - M Bolla
- Emeritus Professor of Radiation Oncology, Grenoble - Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | - J L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Bossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - A Briganti
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Milan; Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - I Brummelhuis
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - M Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - D Castellano
- Medical Oncology Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - R Cathomas
- Department Innere Medizin, Abteilung Onkologie und Hämatologie, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - A Chiti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - A Choudhury
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - E Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, HUEP, Paris; Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - S Crabb
- Cancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - S Culine
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris
| | - B De Bari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire "Jean Minjoz" of Besançon, INSERM UMR 1098, Besançon, France; Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - W DeBlok
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P J L De Visschere
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Genitourinary Radiology and Mammography, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent
| | - K Decaestecker
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - K Dimitropoulos
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - J L Dominguez-Escrig
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - S Fanti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico S Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - V Fonteyne
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - M Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - J J Futterer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G Gakis
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Julius-Maximillians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - B Geavlete
- Department of Urology, Saint John Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - P Gontero
- Division of Urology, Molinette Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - B Grubmüller
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - S Hafeez
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D E Hansel
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego Pathology, La Jolla, USA
| | - A Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - D Hayne
- Department of Urology, UWA Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - A M Henry
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - V Hernandez
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación de Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - H Herr
- Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - K Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - P Hoskin
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, London, UK
| | - J Huguet
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - B A Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - R Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - A M Kamat
- Department of Urology - Division of Surgery, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - V Khoo
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A E Kiltie
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S Krege
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - S Ladoire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - P C Lara
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Roque, Canarias; Universidad Fernando Pessoa, Canarias, Spain
| | - A Leliveld
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - V Løgager
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - A Lorch
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Y Loriot
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, INSERM U981, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - R Meijer
- UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, MS Oncologic Urology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Carmen Mir
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - M Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - H Mostafid
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - A-C Müller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - C R Müller
- Cancer Treatment Centre, Sorlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - J N'Dow
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - A Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Hospital Foch, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - J R Oddens
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Oldenburg
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - S Osanto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - W J G Oyen
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - L Pacheco-Figueiredo
- Department of Urology, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto; Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - H Pappot
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M I Patel
- Department of Urology, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - B R Pieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
| | - K Plass
- EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - M Remzi
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Retz
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J Richenberg
- Department of Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - M Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - F Roghmann
- Department of Urology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Marien Hospital, Herne, Germany
| | - J E Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - M Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris
| | - O Rouvière
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service d'Imagerie Urinaire et Vasculaire, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Lyon, France
| | - C Salembier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Europe Hospitals Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Salminen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - P Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - S Sengupta
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Sherif
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - R J Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Smits
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - A Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - G N Thalmann
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Berne, Switzerland
| | - B Tombal
- Division of Urology, IREC, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCL, Brussels, Belgium
| | - B Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - S Vahr Lauridsen
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - R Valdagni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - H Van Poppel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M D Vartolomei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Targu Mures, Romania
| | - E Veskimäe
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - A Vilaseca
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F A Vives Rivera
- Clinica HematoOncologica Bonadona Prevenir, Universidad Metropolitana, Clinica Club de Leones, Barranquilla, Colombia
| | - T Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - P Wiklund
- Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System, New York City, USA; Department of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Williams
- Department of Urology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - R Zigeuner
- Department of Urology, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - J A Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Naismith O, Mayles H, Bidmead M, Clark CH, Gulliford S, Hassan S, Khoo V, Roberts K, South C, Hall E, Dearnaley D. Radiotherapy Quality Assurance for the CHHiP Trial: Conventional Versus Hypofractionated High-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:611-620. [PMID: 31201110 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Revised: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/12/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The CHHiP trial investigated the use of moderate hypofractionation for the treatment of localised prostate cancer using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). A radiotherapy quality assurance programme was developed to assess compliance with treatment protocol and to audit treatment planning and dosimetry of IMRT. This paper considers the outcome and effectiveness of the programme. MATERIALS AND METHODS Quality assurance exercises included a pre-trial process document and planning benchmark cases, prospective case reviews and a dosimetry site visit on-trial and a post-trial feedback questionnaire. RESULTS In total, 41 centres completed the quality assurance programme (37 UK, four international) between 2005 and 2010. Centres used either forward-planned (field-in-field single phase) or inverse-planned IMRT (25 versus 17). For pre-trial quality assurance exercises, 7/41 (17%) centres had minor deviations in their radiotherapy processes; 45/82 (55%) benchmark plans had minor variations and 17/82 (21%) had major variations. One hundred prospective case reviews were completed for 38 centres. Seventy-one per cent required changes to clinical outlining pre-treatment (primarily prostate apex and base, seminal vesicles and penile bulb). Errors in treatment planning were reduced relative to pre-trial quality assurance results (49% minor and 6% major variations). Dosimetry audits were conducted for 32 centres. Ion chamber dose point measurements were within ±2.5% in the planning target volume and ±8% in the rectum. 28/36 films for combined fields passed gamma criterion 3%/3 mm and 11/15 of IMRT fluence film sets passed gamma criterion 4%/4 mm using a 98% tolerance. Post-trial feedback showed that trial participation was beneficial in evolving clinical practice and that the quality assurance programme helped some centres to implement and audit prostate IMRT. CONCLUSION Overall, quality assurance results were satisfactory and the CHHiP quality assurance programme contributed to the success of the trial by auditing radiotherapy treatment planning and protocol compliance. Quality assurance supported the introduction of IMRT in UK centres, giving additional confidence and external review of IMRT where it was a newly adopted technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Naismith
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - H Mayles
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Bebington, Wirral, UK
| | - M Bidmead
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C H Clark
- Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - S Gulliford
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - S Hassan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - V Khoo
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - K Roberts
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C South
- Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - E Hall
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - D Dearnaley
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Escudier B, Porta C, Schmidinger M, Rioux-Leclercq N, Bex A, Khoo V, Grünwald V, Gillessen S, Horwich A. Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:706-720. [PMID: 30788497 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 629] [Impact Index Per Article: 125.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- B Escudier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - C Porta
- Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pavia, Pavia; Division of Translational Oncology, IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
| | - M Schmidinger
- Department of Medicine I, Clinical Division of Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - N Rioux-Leclercq
- Department of Pathology, Rennes Hospital and University, Rennes, France
| | - A Bex
- UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital, Specialist Center for Kidney Cancer, London, UK; Division of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - V Khoo
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | - V Grünwald
- Internal Medicine (Tumour Research) and Clinic for Urology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - S Gillessen
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie, Manchester, UK; Division of Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - A Horwich
- Department of Academic Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton Hospital, Sutton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Khoo V, Hawkins M, Ahmed M, Kirby A, van As N, McDonald F, Franks K, Syndikus I, Jain S, Tree A, Patel R, Hall E. A Randomised Trial of Conventional Care versus Radioablation (Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy) for Extracranial Oligometastases. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.02.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
14
|
Anderson N, Jackson J, Wada M, Schneider M, Rolfo M, Fahandej M, Joon DL, Khoo V. Prediction of Feeding Tube Needs in Head and Neck Radiation therapy Patients: Independent Validation of a Feeding Tube Prognostic Tool. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.12.231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
15
|
Huddart R, Henry A, Staffurth J, Syndikus I, Mitra A, Venkitraman R, McNair H, Khoo V, Lewis E, Vassallo-Bonner C, Baker A, Horan G, Parsons E, Moinuddin S, Hansen V, Birtle A, Hafeez S, Goubar A, Hall E. OC-0058: Clinical outcomes of the first rct of adaptive radiotherapy in bladder cancer (HYBRID CRUK/12/055). Radiother Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(18)30368-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
16
|
Hanna GG, Murray L, Patel R, Jain S, Aitken KL, Franks KN, van As N, Tree A, Hatfield P, Harrow S, McDonald F, Ahmed M, Saran FH, Webster GJ, Khoo V, Landau D, Eaton DJ, Hawkins MA. UK Consensus on Normal Tissue Dose Constraints for Stereotactic Radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:5-14. [PMID: 29033164 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 157] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2017] [Revised: 09/07/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Six UK studies investigating stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) are currently open. Many of these involve the treatment of oligometastatic disease at different locations in the body. Members of all the trial management groups collaborated to generate a consensus document on appropriate organ at risk dose constraints. Values from existing but older reviews were updated using data from current studies. It is hoped that this unified approach will facilitate standardised implementation of SABR across the UK and will allow meaningful toxicity comparisons between SABR studies and internationally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G G Hanna
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, UK.
| | - L Murray
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - R Patel
- National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - S Jain
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - K L Aitken
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - K N Franks
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - N van As
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Tree
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - P Hatfield
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - S Harrow
- Department of Radiotherapy, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - F McDonald
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - M Ahmed
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - F H Saran
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - G J Webster
- Department of Radiotherapy, Worcester Oncology Centre, Worcester, UK
| | - V Khoo
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - D Landau
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - D J Eaton
- National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - M A Hawkins
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Khoo V, Hawkins M, McDonald F, Ahmed M, Kirby A, Van As N, Franks K, Syndikus I, Jain S, Tree A, Eaton D, Patel R, Goubar A, Kilburn L, Toms C, Hall E. CORE: A randomised trial of COventional care versus Radioablation (stereotactic body radiotherapy) for Extracranial oligometastases. Lung Cancer 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(18)30219-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
18
|
Augustin Y, Chaw C, van As N, Tait D, Wells E, Khoo V, Aitken K. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pelvic Re-Irradiation: Review of Dose, Toxicity, and Clinical Outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.2134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
19
|
Patrikidou A, Uccello M, Tree A, Parker C, Attard G, Eeles R, Khoo V, van As N, Huddart R, Dearnaley D, Reid A. Upfront Docetaxel in the Post-STAMPEDE World: Lessons from an Early Evaluation of Non-trial Usage in Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2017; 29:e174-e175. [PMID: 28652092 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2017] [Revised: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 06/06/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A Patrikidou
- Academic Uro-Oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - M Uccello
- Academic Uro-Oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - A Tree
- Academic Uro-Oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - C Parker
- Academic Uro-Oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - G Attard
- Academic Uro-Oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - R Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Urology Oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - V Khoo
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Urology Oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - N van As
- Urology Oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Huddart
- Academic Uro-Oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - D Dearnaley
- Academic Uro-Oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Reid
- Academic Uro-Oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Huddart R, Henry A, Khoo V, Staffurth J, Syndikus I, Hansen V, McNair H, Hafeez S, Lewis R, Parsons E, Baker A, Vassallo-Bonner C, Moinuddin S, Illambas J, Birtle A, Horan G, Rimmer Y, Venkitaraman R, Mitra A, Hall E. Toxicity and Survival Outcomes of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Hypofractionated Bladder Radiation Therapy in an Elderly Population With or Without Image Guided Adaptive Plan Selection (HYBRID - CRUK/12/055). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
21
|
Khoo V. SP-0492: What are the best ingredients to deliver the optimal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(17)30932-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
22
|
Khoo V, Ahmed M, McDonald F, Kirby A, Van As N, Hawkins M, Syndikis I, Franks K, Jain S, Tree A, Eaton D, Patel R, Braidley MY, Kilburn L, Toms C, Hall E. 122: CORE: A randomised trial of COnventional care versus Radioablation (stereotactic body radiotherapy) for Extracranial oligometastases. Lung Cancer 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(17)30172-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
23
|
Gnanapragasam VJ, Hori S, Johnston T, Smith D, Muir K, Alonzi R, Winkler M, Warren A, Staffurth J, Khoo V, Tree A, Macneill A, McMenemin R, Mason M, Cathcart P, de Souza N, Sooriakumaran P, Weston R, Wylie J, Hall E, Lane A, Cross W, Syndikus I, Koupparis A. Clinical management and research priorities for high-risk prostate cancer in the UK: Meeting report of a multidisciplinary panel in conjunction with the NCRI Prostate Cancer Clinical Studies Localised Subgroup. Journal of Clinical Urology 2016. [DOI: 10.1177/2051415816651362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The management of high-risk prostate cancer has become increasingly sophisticated, with refinements in radical therapy and the inclusion of adjuvant local and systemic therapies. Despite this, high-risk prostate cancer continues to have significant treatment failure rates, with progression to metastasis, castrate resistance and ultimately disease-specific death. In an effort to discuss the challenges in this field, the UK National Clinical Research Institute’s Prostate Cancer Clinical Studies localised subgroup convened a multidisciplinary national meeting in the autumn of 2014. The remit of the meeting was to debate and reach a consensus on the key clinical and research challenges in high-risk prostate cancer and to identify themes that the UK would be best placed to pursue to help improve outcomes. This report presents the outcome of those discussions and the key recommendations for future research in this highly heterogeneous disease entity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - S Hori
- Academic Urology Group, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - T Johnston
- Academic Urology Group, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - D Smith
- Prostate Cancer Support Association, UK
| | - K Muir
- Institute of Public Health, University of Manchester, UK
| | - R Alonzi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, UK
| | - M Winkler
- Department of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, UK
| | - A Warren
- Department of Pathology, Addenbrookes Hospital, UK
| | - J Staffurth
- Institute of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University, UK
| | - V Khoo
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, UK
| | - A Tree
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, UK
| | - A Macneill
- Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, UK
| | | | - M Mason
- Institute of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University, UK
| | - P Cathcart
- Department of Urology, UCL Hospitals, UK
| | | | | | - R Weston
- Department of Urology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, UK
| | - J Wylie
- Department of Oncology, Christie Hospital, UK
| | - E Hall
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit; Institute of Cancer Research, UK
| | - A Lane
- Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, UK
| | - W Cross
- Department of Urology, St. James’s University Hospital, UK
| | - I Syndikus
- Radiotherapy Department, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, UK
| | - A Koupparis
- Department of Urology, Bristol Urological Institute, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Necchi A, Pond G, Raggi D, Ottenhof S, Horenblas S, Khoo V, Hakenberg O, Heidenreich A, Eigl B, Nappi L, Matsumoto K, Vaishampayan U, Woods M, Giannatempo P, Geynisman D, Preto M, Xylinas E, Milowsky M, Di Lorenzo G, Sonpavde G. Outcomes of peri-operative chemotherapy (PO-CT) for locally advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma (LA-PSCC): results from a multicenter analysis. Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw373.66] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
25
|
Escudier B, Porta C, Schmidinger M, Rioux-Leclercq N, Bex A, Khoo V, Gruenvald V, Horwich A. Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2016; 27:v58-v68. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 368] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
|
26
|
Hafeez S, Horwich A, Omar O, Mohammed K, Thompson A, Kumar P, Khoo V, Van As N, Eeles R, Dearnaley D, Huddart R. Selective organ preservation with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of muscle invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Br J Cancer 2016; 114:e24. [PMID: 27228294 PMCID: PMC4984461 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
|
27
|
Henderson D, Ostler P, Tree A, Hoskin P, Dankulchai P, Taylor H, Khoo V, van As N. First UK Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Cohort: Prospective Outcomes with 2.5 Years’ Median Follow-up. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
28
|
Chaw C, Henderson D, Khoo V, Tree A, Eeles R, Van As N. OC-0447: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in oligometastatic prostate cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(16)31696-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
29
|
Khoo V. SP-0507: Bladder variability for pelvic radiotherapy: its approaches and impact. Radiother Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(16)31757-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
30
|
Mansfield DC, Kyula JN, Rosenfelder N, Chao-Chu J, Kramer-Marek G, Khan AA, Roulstone V, McLaughlin M, Melcher AA, Vile RG, Pandha HS, Khoo V, Harrington KJ. Oncolytic vaccinia virus as a vector for therapeutic sodium iodide symporter gene therapy in prostate cancer. Gene Ther 2016; 23:357-68. [PMID: 26814609 PMCID: PMC4827015 DOI: 10.1038/gt.2016.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2015] [Revised: 12/07/2015] [Accepted: 01/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Oncolytic strains of vaccinia virus are currently in clinical development with clear evidence of safety and promising signs of efficacy. Addition of therapeutic genes to the viral genome may increase the therapeutic efficacy of vaccinia. We evaluated the therapeutic potential of vaccinia virus expressing the sodium iodide symporter (NIS) in prostate cancer models, combining oncolysis, external beam radiotherapy and NIS-mediated radioiodide therapy. The NIS-expressing vaccinia virus (VV-NIS), GLV-1h153, was tested in in vitro analyzes of viral cell killing, combination with radiotherapy, NIS expression, cellular radioiodide uptake and apoptotic cell death in PC3, DU145, LNCaP and WPMY-1 human prostate cell lines. In vivo experiments were carried out in PC3 xenografts in CD1 nude mice to assess NIS expression and tumor radioiodide uptake. In addition, the therapeutic benefit of radioiodide treatment in combination with viral oncolysis and external beam radiotherapy was measured. In vitro viral cell killing of prostate cancers was dose- and time-dependent and was through apoptotic mechanisms. Importantly, combined virus therapy and iodizing radiation did not adversely affect oncolysis. NIS gene expression in infected cells was functional and mediated uptake of radioiodide both in vitro and in vivo. Therapy experiments with both xenograft and immunocompetent Transgenic Adenocarcinoma of the Mouse Prostate (TRAMP) mouse models showed that the addition of radioiodide to VV-NIS-infected tumors was more effective than each single-agent therapy, restricting tumor growth and increasing survival. In conclusion, VV-NIS is effective in prostate cancer models. This treatment modality would be an attractive complement to existing clinical radiotherapy practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D C Mansfield
- Divisions of Cancer Biology and Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Labs, London, UK
| | - J N Kyula
- Divisions of Cancer Biology and Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Labs, London, UK
| | - N Rosenfelder
- Divisions of Cancer Biology and Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Labs, London, UK
| | - J Chao-Chu
- Divisions of Cancer Biology and Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Labs, London, UK
| | - G Kramer-Marek
- Divisions of Cancer Biology and Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Labs, London, UK
| | - A A Khan
- Divisions of Cancer Biology and Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Labs, London, UK
| | - V Roulstone
- Divisions of Cancer Biology and Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Labs, London, UK
| | - M McLaughlin
- Divisions of Cancer Biology and Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Labs, London, UK
| | - A A Melcher
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - R G Vile
- Molecular Medicine Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - H S Pandha
- Postgraduate Medical School, The University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - V Khoo
- Divisions of Cancer Biology and Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Labs, London, UK
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
- University of Melbourne and Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | - K J Harrington
- Divisions of Cancer Biology and Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Labs, London, UK
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Khoo V, Pabary R, Lund Palau H, Turnbull A, Madden N, Schelenz S, Jones A, Morales S, Alton EWFW, Davies JC. S112 Variability in susceptibility to antibiotics and bacteriophages between individual colonies of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from cystic fibrosis sputum samples: implications for future clinical trial design. Thorax 2015. [DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207770.118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
32
|
Dearnaley D, Syndikus I, Mossop H, Birtle A, Bloomfield D, Cruickshank C, Graham J, Hassan S, Khoo V, Logue J, Mayles H, Money-Kyrle J, Naismith O, Panades M, Patterson H, Scrase C, Staffurth J, Tremlett J, Griffin C, Hall E. 8LBA 5 year outcomes of a phase III randomised trial of conventional or hypofractionated high dose intensity modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer (CRUK/06/016): report from the CHHiP Trial Investigators Group. Eur J Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(16)31932-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
33
|
Aitken K, Tree A, Thomas K, Nutting C, Hawkins M, Tait D, Mandeville H, Ahmed M, Lalondrelle S, Miah A, Taylor A, Ross G, Khoo V, van As N. Initial UK Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Extracranial Oligometastases: Can We Change the Therapeutic Paradigm? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2015; 27:411-9. [PMID: 25912366 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2014] [Revised: 03/10/2015] [Accepted: 03/19/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To retrospectively review the toxicity and early outcome data from patients who have received stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for extracranial oligometastases at a single UK institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eligible patients had ≤3 extracranial metastases and performance status ≤2. Prior systemic therapy and radical treatment of oligometastastic relapse with any standard treatment modality was permitted. Patients with synchronous metastatic disease were excluded unless they had evidence of controlled primary disease after radical therapy. Follow-up consisted of clinical examination, biochemical and radiological assessments in accordance with standard clinical care. Progression events were defined using RECIST. Toxicity was evaluated using CTCAE v4.0. Local control, progression-free survival (PFS), freedom from widespread distant metastasis (defined as disease not amenable to further radical salvage therapy) and overall survival were calculated. RESULTS Between July 2011 and April 2014, 73 patients with 87 metastases received SBRT (range 1-3 per patient). The median follow-up was 14.5 months (range 0-26.4). The median PFS was 14.5 months (1 year PFS 57%, 2 year 28%); 1 year overall survival 96%, 2 year 79.8%; 2 year local control 88%. At 2 years, 46% of patients were free from widespread distant metastases. No ≥ grade 3 acute or late toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION At this time point, observed toxicity is minimal with excellent local control rates. This promising treatment paradigm requires further investigation in the context of a randomised controlled trial to establish if the addition of SBRT to standard care improves survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Aitken
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
| | - A Tree
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - K Thomas
- Department of Statistics, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - C Nutting
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Hawkins
- Gray Institute for Radiation Oncology and Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - D Tait
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - H Mandeville
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Ahmed
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - S Lalondrelle
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - A Miah
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - A Taylor
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - G Ross
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - V Khoo
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - N van As
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hafeez S, Horwich A, Omar O, Mohammed K, Thompson A, Kumar P, Khoo V, Van As N, Eeles R, Dearnaley D, Huddart R. Selective organ preservation with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of muscle invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Br J Cancer 2015; 112:1626-35. [PMID: 25897675 PMCID: PMC4430712 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2014] [Revised: 02/12/2015] [Accepted: 02/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) aims to offer organ preservation without oncological compromise. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy provides survival advantage; response may guide patient selection for bladder preservation and identify those most likely to have favourable result with radiotherapy. METHODS Ninety-four successive patients with T2-T4aN0M0 bladder cancer treated between January 2000 and June 2011 were analysed at the Royal Marsden Hospital. Patients received platinum-based chemotherapy following transurethral resection of bladder tumour; repeat cystoscopy (± biopsy) was performed to guide subsequent management. Responders were treated with radiotherapy. Poor responders were recommended radical cystectomy. Progression-free survival (PFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method; univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS Response assessment was performed in 89 patients. Seventy-eight (88%) demonstrated response; 53 (60%) achieved complete response (CR); 74 responders had radiotherapy; 4 opted for cystectomy. Eleven (12%) demonstrated poor response, 10 received cystectomy. Median survival for CR was 90 months (95% CI 64.7, 115.9) compared with 16 months (95% CI 5.4, 27.4; P < 0.001) poor responders. On multivariate analysis, only response was associated with significantly improved PFS, OS and DSS. After a median follow-up of 39 months (range 4-127 months), 14 patients (16%) required salvage cystectomy (8 for non-muscle invasive disease, 5 for invasive recurrence, 1 for radiotherapy related toxicity). In all, 82% had an intact bladder at last follow-up after radiotherapy; 67% had an intact bladder at last follow-up or death. Our study is limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS Response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is a favourable prognostic indicator and can be used to select patients for radiotherapy allowing bladder preservation in >80% of the selected patients.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/surgery
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
- Cisplatin/administration & dosage
- Cystectomy/methods
- Disease-Free Survival
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Neoadjuvant Therapy
- Neoplasm Invasiveness
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery
- Organ Preservation/methods
- Retrospective Studies
- Salvage Therapy/methods
- Treatment Outcome
- Urinary Bladder/drug effects
- Urinary Bladder/pathology
- Urinary Bladder/radiation effects
- Urinary Bladder/surgery
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Hafeez
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Horwich
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - O Omar
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K Mohammed
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Thompson
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P Kumar
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - V Khoo
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - N Van As
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Eeles
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - D Dearnaley
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - R Huddart
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hafeez S, McDonald F, Lalondrelle S, McNair H, Warren-Oseni K, Jones K, Harris V, Taylor H, Khoo V, Thomas K, Hansen V, Dearnaley D, Horwich A, Huddart R. EP-1240: Clinical outcomes of image guided adaptive radiotherapy (IGART) for hypofractionated treatment of bladder cancer. Radiother Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(15)41232-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
36
|
|
37
|
Henderson D, Tree A, Taylor H, Khoo V, Van As N. EP-1241: SBRT for localised prostate cancer: an evaluation of toxicity with frequent prospective assessment. Radiother Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(15)41233-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
38
|
Anderson N, Jackson J, Khoo V, Schneider M, Rolfo M, Gan H, Kaegi K, Sneyd F, Lim Joon D, Wada M. Gross Tumor Volume Size and Oral Cavity Dose Drive Dysphagia in Definitive (Chemo) IMRT for Head and Neck Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.1711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
39
|
Escudier B, Porta C, Schmidinger M, Algaba F, Patard J, Khoo V, Eisen T, Horwich A. Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2014; 25 Suppl 3:iii49-56. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 284] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
40
|
Tree A, Siu B, Townsend-Thorn D, Murray D, Riley U, Khoo V, van As N. The Incidence of Ciprofloxacin Resistance in Patients Undergoing Gold Seed Insertion for Image-guided Prostate Radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2014.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
41
|
Tree A, Ostler P, Hoskin P, Dankulchai P, Khoo V, van As N. First UK Cohort of Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT): Acute Toxicity and Early Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Outcomes. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2013.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
42
|
Khoo V. SP-0113: Do we need elective nodal irradiation in prostate cancer? Radiother Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(15)30218-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
43
|
Anderson N, Jackson J, Wada M, Schneider-Kolsky M, Rolfo M, Gan H, Kaegi K, Sneyd F, Lim Joon D, Khoo V. Creating Guidelines for Reactive and Prophylactic Enteral Feeding in Definitive (Chemo) IMRT for Head-and-Neck Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.06.1246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
44
|
McDonald F, Lalondrelle S, Taylor H, Warren-Oseni K, Khoo V, McNair H, Harris V, Hafeez S, Hansen V, Thomas K, Jones K, Dearnaley D, Horwich A, Huddart R. Clinical Implementation of Adaptive Hypofractionated Bladder Radiotherapy for Improvement in Normal Tissue Irradiation. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2013; 25:549-56. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2013.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2013] [Revised: 04/15/2013] [Accepted: 04/16/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
45
|
Affiliation(s)
- V Khoo
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and St. George's NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Creak A, Hall E, Horwich A, Eeles R, Khoo V, Huddart R, Parker C, Griffin C, Bidmead M, Warrington J, Dearnaley D. Randomised pilot study of dose escalation using conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: long-term follow-up. Br J Cancer 2013; 109:651-7. [PMID: 23880826 PMCID: PMC3738135 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2013] [Revised: 06/10/2013] [Accepted: 06/22/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (CFRT) with initial androgen suppression (AS) is a standard management for localised prostate cancer (PC). This pilot study evaluated the role of dose escalation and appropriate target volume margin. Here, we report long-term follow-up. METHODS Eligible patients had T1b-T3b N0 M0 PC. After neoadjuvant AS, they were randomised to CFRT, giving (a) 64 Gy with either a 1.0- or 1.5-cm margin and (b) ±10 Gy boost to the prostate alone. RESULTS One hundred and twenty-six men were randomised and treated. Median follow-up was 13.7 years. The median age was 66.6 years at randomisation. Median presenting prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 14 ng ml(-1). Sixty-four out of 126 patients developed PSA failure. Forty-nine out of 126 patients restarted AS, 34 out of 126 developed metastases and 28 out of 126 developed castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Fifty-one out of 126 patients died; 19 out of 51 died of PC. Median overall survival (OS) was 14.4 years. Although escalated dose results were favourable, no statistically significant differences were seen between the randomised groups; PSA control (hazard ratio (HR): 0.77 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.47-1.26)), development of CRPC (HR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.40-1.65)), PC-specific survival (HR: 0.59 (95% CI:0.23-1.49)) and OS (HR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.47-1.40)). There was no evidence of a difference in PSA control according to margin size (HR: 1.01 (95% CI: 0.61-1.66)). INTERPRETATION Long-term follow-up of this small pilot study is compatible with a benefit from dose escalation, but confirmation from larger trials is required. There was no obvious detriment using the smaller radiotherapy margin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Creak
- Academic Urology Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton and London, UK
| | - E Hall
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Horwich
- Academic Urology Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton and London, UK
| | - R Eeles
- Academic Urology Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton and London, UK
| | - V Khoo
- Academic Urology Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton and London, UK
| | - R Huddart
- Academic Urology Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton and London, UK
| | - C Parker
- Academic Urology Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton and London, UK
| | - C Griffin
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - M Bidmead
- Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden Hospital Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton and London, UK
| | - J Warrington
- Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden Hospital Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton and London, UK
| | - D Dearnaley
- Academic Urology Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton and London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Tree A, Alexander E, Van As N, Dearnaley D, Khoo V. Biological Dose Escalation and Hypofractionation: What is There to be Gained and How Will it Best be Done? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2013; 25:483-98. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2013.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2013] [Accepted: 05/09/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
48
|
Khoo V, Loblaw DA. Prostate cancer: current status, new developments and applications in radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2013; 25:449-50. [PMID: 23756325 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2013.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2013] [Accepted: 05/09/2013] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
49
|
Tree A, Wells E, Khoo V, van As N. Hypofractionated Radiotherapy with Cyberknife for Localised Prostate Cancer: Early Experience. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2012.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
50
|
Anderson N, Wada M, Schneider-Kolsky M, Rolfo M, Scandurra D, Lim Joon D, Khoo V. PO-0674: Understanding the impact of two pharyngeal axis delineation guidelines for planning definition in head & neck IMRT. Radiother Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(15)32980-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|