1
|
Chamois J, Septans A, Schipman B, Gross E, Blanchard N, Passerat V, Debelleix C, Hemery C, Latorzeff I, Pointreau Y. Metastases-directed radiotherapy in castration resistant oligo metastatic prostate cancer: A multicentric retrospective study from the French group COLib. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100762. [PMID: 38572302 PMCID: PMC10987832 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Oligometastases are defined as a number of detectable metastases less or equal to 5. In castrate-resistant oligo metastatic prostate Cancer (CR oligoM PC), Metastases-Directed Ablative radiotherapy (MDRT) is poorly investigated. Our study retrospectively reviewed the cases of CR oligoM PC treated with MDRT in 8 French high-volume radiotherapy centers. OS and PFS are defined as the delay between the first day of MDRT and death (OS) or progression according to PCWG criteria (PFS). OS and PFS are evaluated according to Kaplan Meyer, curves are compared with log rank test. Logistic regression was used to identify predictive factors for outcome: bone versus node metastasis, ISUP grade, PSA doubling Time (PSADT) at the time of MDRT, time to castration resistance. 107 patients were included in the study, among those 197 metastases received MDRT. For the overall population, the median follow-up was 25.2 months (1,4-145). OS was 93 % at 2 years and 81,4% at 3 years. At 2 years, 100 % of patients with node-only metastasis were alive versus 88,7% among those who have bone metastases (p = 0,72). The median PFS was 12,6 months (IC 95 % [9,6; 17]), with no difference among patients with node only disease versus the rest of the cohort. The PFS was 18,2 months (10,0; 32,4) in patients with PSADT >6 months versus 10,7 months (8,9; 14,3) when PSADT was inferior to 6 months. However, this difference did not reach significant. We did not find a correlation neither between ISUP grade (1-2 versus 3-4-5) and PFS, nor between hormone-sensitivity duration and PFS. Patients receiving MDRT for CR oligoM PC have a good prognosis with 81,6% OS at 3 years. PSA DT longer than 6 months could be related to better PFS. MDRT strategy could postpone the onset of new systemic treatment with median PFS >1 year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Chamois
- Centre Hospitalier privé, Saint Grégoire, France
| | | | - B. Schipman
- Radiotherapie, Institut de Cancerologie de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - E. Gross
- Radiotherapie, Hopital prive Clairval – Ramsay Sante, Marseille, France
| | - N. Blanchard
- Radiotherapie, Centre de Cancerologie les Dentellieres, Valenciennes, France
| | | | - C. Debelleix
- Radiotherapie, Clinique, Bordeaux Tivoli- Ducos, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - I. Latorzeff
- Radiotherapie, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Y. Pointreau
- Radiotherapie, Institut Interrégional de Cancerologie, Le Mans, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shuang H, Feng J, Caineng C, Qifeng J, Ting J, Yonghong H, Xiaozhong C. Long-term efficacy analysis of radiotherapy and local management of metastases in patients with newly diagnosed oligometastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A prospective, single-arm, single-center clinical study. Radiother Oncol 2024:110265. [PMID: 38583720 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We conducted a single-center, single-arm study (NCT03129412) to prospectively analyze the long-term outcomes of newly diagnosed patients with oligometastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) who received radical radiotherapy and local treatment of metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients who reached disease controll after platinum-based palliative chemotherapy continued to receive radical radiotherapy for the nasopharyngeal region and neck. Appropriate local treatments were selected to treat the metastatic lesions. The primary endpoint of this study was overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Fifty-one patients were included in the final analysis. During a median follow-up of 60 months, the median OS and PFS were 53.87 and 24.23 months, respectively. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year PFS and OS rates were 76.5 %, 38.1 %, and 31.8 % and 98 %, 75.4 %, 45.6 %, respectively. Both single and multivariate analysis indicated that maintenance therapy after radiotherapy could significantly increase PFS (36.43 vs. 16.1 months, P = 0.005). The OS of patients with single organ metastasis was significantly better than that of patients with double organ metastasis (P = 0.001). In addition, the number of metastatic organs also significantly affected PFS in the multifactor analysis. CONCLUSION Patients with newly diagnosed oligometastatic NPC can achieve long-term survival after receiving radical radiotherapy to the primary site and local treatment for metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huang Shuang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences; Key Laboratory of Head & Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jiang Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences; Key Laboratory of Head & Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Cao Caineng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences; Key Laboratory of Head & Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jin Qifeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences; Key Laboratory of Head & Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jin Ting
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences; Key Laboratory of Head & Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Hua Yonghong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences; Key Laboratory of Head & Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Chen Xiaozhong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences; Key Laboratory of Head & Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Down B, Lakunina S, Maynard N, Markar SR, Gordon-Weeks A. Oncological outcomes of patients with oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2024; 50:108231. [PMID: 38461569 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
Oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer was recently defined by consensus as the presence of no more than two metastases and an 18-week period of oncological stability during chemotherapy. The number of patients who fit this criterion and whether their oncological outcome differs from those with multi-metastatic disease is unknown. We analysed a database of 497 patients from 2017 to 2021 with metastatic oesophageal cancer. In total, 36 (7.2%) had oligometastatic disease and significantly improved median overall survival (mOS) versus multi-metastatic disease. In synchronous OMD, mOS was 26.8 months versus 7.3 months and in metachronous OMD, 38.6 months versus 6.1 months (both p < 0.0001). A subset of oligometastatic patients who underwent surgical management of their oligometastases after primary tumour resection demonstrated significantly increased mOS compared with systemic treatment alone (60 months versus 24.4 months; p < 0.038). Oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer is associated with improved oncological outcome when compared to multi-metastatic disease. Further work is needed to identify patients who will benefit from aggressive treatment of metastatic oesophagogastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Billy Down
- Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
| | | | - Nick Maynard
- Department of Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Sheraz R Markar
- Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alex Gordon-Weeks
- Oxford Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Surgical Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shor D, Khoo V, Jayaprakash KT. Advancing the Paradigm: Oligometastatic Disease and the Impact of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024:S0936-6555(24)00134-1. [PMID: 38631977 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- D Shor
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK.
| | - V Khoo
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - K T Jayaprakash
- Oncology Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn NHS Foundation Trust, Kings Lynn, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Franceschini D, Franzese C, Comito T, Ilieva MB, Spoto R, Marzo AM, Dominici L, Massaro M, Bellu L, Badalamenti M, Mancosu P, Scorsetti M. Definitive results of a prospective non-randomized phase 2 study on stereotactic body radiation therapy (sbrt) for medically inoperable lung and liver oligometastases from breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 2024:110240. [PMID: 38522597 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Revised: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To report mature results for local control and survival in oligometastatic (OM) breast cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on lung and/or liver lesions in a phase II trial. METHODS This is a prospective non-randomized phase II trial (NCT02581670) which enrolled patients from 2015 to 2021. Eligibility criteria included: age > 18 years, ECOG 0-2, diagnosis of breast cancer, maximum of 4 lung/liver lesions (with a maximum diameter < 5 cm), metastatic disease confined to the lungs and liver or extrapulmonary or extrahepatic disease stable or responding to systemic therapy. The primary end-points were local control (LC) and treatment-related toxicities. The secondary end-points included overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), time to next systemic therapy (TTNS), poly-progression free survival (PPFS). RESULTS The study included 64 patients with a total of 90 lesions treated with SBRT. LC at 1 and 2 years was 94.9 %, 91 % at 3 years. Median local control was not reached. Median OS was 16.5 months, OS at 1, 2 and 3 years was 87.5 %, 60.9 % and 51.9 %, respectively. Median DMFS was 8.3 months, DMFS at 1, 2 and 3 years was 38.1 %, 20.6 % and 16 % respectively. At univariate analysis, local response to SBRT was found to be statistically linked with better OS, DMFS and STFS. CONCLUSION SBRT is a safe and valid option in oligometastatic breast cancer patients, with very high rates of local control. An optimal selection of patients is likely needed to improve survival outcomes and reduce the rate of distant progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Franceschini
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089 Milan, Italy.
| | - C Franzese
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milan, Italy
| | - T Comito
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - M B Ilieva
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milan, Italy
| | - R Spoto
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - A M Marzo
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - L Dominici
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - M Massaro
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - L Bellu
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - M Badalamenti
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - P Mancosu
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - M Scorsetti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rodríguez MCR, Chen-Zhao X, Hernando O, Flamarique S, Fernández-Letón P, Campo M, López M, Rodríguez M, Zucca D, Martínez D, Sánchez-Saugar E, Mañeru F, Ruiz-Zorrilla JG, de Acilu PG, Valero J, Montero A, Ciérvide R, Alvarez B, García-Aranda M, Alonso R, de la Casa MA, Alonso L, Nuñez M, Martí J, Arias F. SBRT-SG-01: final results of a prospective multicenter study on stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver metastases. Clin Transl Oncol 2024:10.1007/s12094-024-03403-w. [PMID: 38431539 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03403-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of liver metastases. METHODS Patients with up to 5 liver metastases were enrolled in this prospective multicenter study and underwent SBRT. Efficacy outcomes included in-field local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Acute and late toxicities were evaluated using CTCAE v.4.0. RESULTS A total of 52 patients with 105 liver metastases were treated between 2015 and 2018. The most common primary tumor was colorectal cancer (72% of cases). Liver metastases were synchronous with the primary tumor diagnosis in 24 patients (46.2%), and 21 patients (40.4%) presented with other extrahepatic oligometastases. All patients underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)/volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) and respiratory gating, and a minimum biologically effective dose (BED10Gy) of 100 Gy was delivered to all lesions. With a median follow-up of 23.1 months (range: 13.4-30.9 months) since liver SBRT, the median actuarial local progression-free survival (local-PFS) was not reached. The actuarial in-field LC rates were 84.9% and 78.4% at 24 and 48 months, respectively. The median actuarial liver-PFS and distant-PFS were 11 and 10.8 months, respectively. The actuarial median overall survival (OS) was 27.7 months from SBRT and 52.5 months from metastases diagnosis. Patients with lesion diameter ≤ 5 cm had significantly better median liver-PFS (p = 0.006) and OS (p = 0.018). No acute or late toxicities of grade ≥ 3 were observed. CONCLUSIONS This prospective multicenter study confirms that liver SBRT is an effective alternative for the treatment of liver metastases, demonstrating high rates of local control and survival while maintaining a low toxicity profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xin Chen-Zhao
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ovidio Hernando
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sonia Flamarique
- Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - Pedro Fernández-Letón
- Medical Physics, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maider Campo
- Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - Mercedes López
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maitane Rodríguez
- Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - Daniel Zucca
- Medical Physics, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Martínez
- Medical Physics, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - Emilio Sánchez-Saugar
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando Mañeru
- Medical Physics, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | | | - Paz García de Acilu
- Medical Physics, Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jeannette Valero
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Angel Montero
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raquel Ciérvide
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Alvarez
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mariola García-Aranda
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosa Alonso
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Leyre Alonso
- Medical Physics, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mónica Nuñez
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jaime Martí
- Medical Physics, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando Arias
- Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Widder J, Simek IM, Goldner GM, Heilemann G, Ubbels JF. Metastases-directed local therapies (MDT) beyond genuine oligometastatic disease (OMD): Indications, endpoints and the role of imaging. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100729. [PMID: 38298549 PMCID: PMC10827679 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
To further personalise treatment in metastatic cancer, the indications for metastases-directed local therapy (MDT) and the biology of oligometastatic disease (OMD) should be kept conceptually apart. Both need to be vigorously investigated. Tumour growth dynamics - growth rate combined with metastatic seeding efficiency - is the single most important biological feature determining the likelihood of success of MDT in an individual patient, which might even be beneficial in slowly developing polymetastatic disease. This can be reasonably well assessed using appropriate clinical imaging. In the context of considering appropriate indications for MDT, detecting metastases at the edge of image resolution should therefore suggest postponing MDT. While three to five lesions are typically used to define OMD, it could be argued that countability throughout the course of metastatic disease, rather than a specific maximum number of lesions, could serve as a better parameter for guiding MDT. Here we argue that the unit of MDT as a treatment option in metastatic cancer might best be defined not as a single procedure at a single point in time, but as a series of treatments that can be delivered in a single or multiple sessions to different lesions over time. Newly emerging lesions that remain amenable to MDT without triggering the start of a new systemic treatment, a change in systemic therapy, or initiation of best supportive care, would thus not constitute a failure of MDT. This would have implications for defining endpoints in clinical trials and registries: Rather than with any disease progression, failure of MDT would only be declared when there is progression to polymetastatic disease, which then precludes further options for MDT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joachim Widder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Inga-Malin Simek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Gregor M. Goldner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Gerd Heilemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan F. Ubbels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Olson R, Abraham H, Leclerc C, Benny A, Baker S, Matthews Q, Chng N, Bergman A, Mou B, Dunne EM, Schellenberg D, Jiang W, Chan E, Atrchian S, Lefresne S, Carolan H, Valev B, Tyldesley S, Bang A, Berrang T, Clark H, Hsu F, Louie AV, Warner A, Palma DA, Howell D, Barry A, Dawson L, Grendarova P, Walker D, Sinha R, Tsai J, Bahig H, Thibault I, Koul R, Senthi S, Phillips I, Grose D, Kelly P, Armstrong J, McDermott R, Johnstone C, Vasan S, Aherne N, Harrow S, Liu M. Single vs. multiple fraction non-inferiority trial of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligo-metastases/progression: SIMPLIFY-SABR-COMET. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:171. [PMID: 38310262 PMCID: PMC10838428 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11905-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy delivery regimens can vary between a single fraction (SF) and multiple fractions (MF) given daily for up to several weeks depending on the location of the cancer or metastases. With limited evidence comparing fractionation regimens for oligometastases, there is support to explore toxicity levels to nearby organs at risk as a primary outcome while using SF and MF stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) as well as explore differences in patient-reported quality of life and experience. METHODS This study will randomize 598 patients in a 1:1 ratio between the standard arm (MF SABR) and the experimental arm (SF SABR). This trial is designed as two randomized controlled trials within one patient population for resource efficiency. The primary objective of the first randomization is to determine if SF SABR is non-inferior to MF SABR, with respect to healthcare provider (HCP)-reported grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) that are related to SABR. Primary endpoint is toxicity while secondary endpoints include lesional control rate (LCR), and progression-free survival (PFS). The second randomization (BC Cancer sites only) will allocate participants to either complete quality of life (QoL) questionnaires only; or QoL questionnaires and a symptom-specific survey with symptom-guided HCP intervention. The primary objective of the second randomization is to determine if radiation-related symptom questionnaire-guided HCP intervention results in improved reported QoL as measured by the EuroQoL-5-dimensions-5levels (EQ-5D-5L) instrument. The primary endpoint is patient-reported QoL and secondary endpoints include: persistence/resolution of symptom reporting, QoL, intervention cost effectiveness, resource utilization, and overall survival. DISCUSSION This study will compare SF and MF SABR in the treatment of oligometastases and oligoprogression to determine if there is non-inferior toxicity for SF SABR in selected participants with 1-5 oligometastatic lesions. This study will also compare patient-reported QoL between participants who receive radiation-related symptom-guided HCP intervention and those who complete questionnaires alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05784428. Date of Registration: 23 March 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Olson
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
- University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada.
- BC Cancer - Prince George, 1215 Lethbridge Street, Prince George, BC, V2M7A9, Canada.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer - Centre for the North, 1215 Lethbridge Street, Prince George, British Columbia, V2M 7E9, Canada.
| | - Hadassah Abraham
- BC Cancer - Prince George, 1215 Lethbridge Street, Prince George, BC, V2M7A9, Canada
| | - Curtis Leclerc
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- BC Cancer - Prince George, 1215 Lethbridge Street, Prince George, BC, V2M7A9, Canada
| | | | - Sarah Baker
- BC Cancer - Surrey, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Quinn Matthews
- BC Cancer - Prince George, 1215 Lethbridge Street, Prince George, BC, V2M7A9, Canada
| | - Nick Chng
- BC Cancer - Prince George, 1215 Lethbridge Street, Prince George, BC, V2M7A9, Canada
| | - Alanah Bergman
- BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Benjamin Mou
- BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Emma M Dunne
- BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Will Jiang
- BC Cancer - Surrey, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elisa Chan
- BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Shilo Lefresne
- BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Hannah Carolan
- BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Boris Valev
- BC Cancer- Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Andrew Bang
- BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Tanya Berrang
- BC Cancer- Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Haley Clark
- BC Cancer - Surrey, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Fred Hsu
- BC Cancer- Abbotsford, Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Warner
- Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - David A Palma
- Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Doris Howell
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Laura Dawson
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Debra Walker
- Patient partner, BC Cancer-Prince George, Prince George, BC, Canada
| | - Rishi Sinha
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jillian Tsai
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Houda Bahig
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Rashmi Koul
- Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Iain Phillips
- Western General Hospital/Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Derek Grose
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Paul Kelly
- Bon Secours Radiotherapy Cork (In Partnership with UPMC Hillman Cancer Centre), Cork, Ireland
| | | | | | - Candice Johnstone
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Srini Vasan
- Precision Cancer Center, Ashland, Kentucky, United States of America
| | - Noel Aherne
- Riverina Cancer Care Centre, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen Harrow
- Western General Hospital/Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Mitchell Liu
- BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Antoni D, Mesny E, El Kabbaj O, Josset S, Noël G, Biau J, Feuvret L, Latorzeff I. Role of radiotherapy in the management of brain oligometastases. Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:103-110. [PMID: 37802747 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
The management of patients with brain oligometastases is complex and relies on specific reasoning compared to extracranial oligometastases. The levels of evidence are still low because patients with brain oligometastases are frequently excluded from randomized clinical trials. Stereotactic radiotherapy should be preferred in this indication over whole brain irradiation, both for patients with metastases in place and for those who have undergone surgery. The decision of local treatment and its timing must be a multidisciplinary reflection taking into account the histological and molecular characteristics of the tumor as well as the intracranial efficacy of the prescribed systemic treatments. Great caution must be observed when using stereotactic radiotherapy and concomitant systemic treatments because interactions are still poorly documented. We present the recommendations of the French society of radiation oncology on the management of brain oligometastatic patients with radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Antoni
- Radiation Therapy Department, Institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 67033 Strasbourg, France.
| | - E Mesny
- Radiation Therapy Department, Hospices civils de Lyon, 69000 Lyon, France
| | - O El Kabbaj
- Radiation Therapy Department, hôpital privé Océane, 56000 Vannes, France
| | - S Josset
- Medical Physics, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, 44800 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - G Noël
- Radiation Therapy Department, Institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 67033 Strasbourg, France
| | - J Biau
- Radiation Therapy Department, centre Jean-Perrin, 63011 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - L Feuvret
- Radiation Therapy Department, Hospices civils de Lyon, 69000 Lyon, France
| | - I Latorzeff
- Radiation Therapy Department, clinique Pasteur, 31300 Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ollivier L, Debbi K, To NH, Cailleteau A, Supiot S, Mervoyer A, Guimas V, Belkacémi Y. Is oligometastatic disease an applicable and useful concept in haematologic malignancies? A narrative review of radiation therapy standards, modern techniques, and innovations. Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:119-130. [PMID: 38143233 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Haematologic malignancies are particular in that they can generally be cured, even when distant metastases are present at diagnosis, unlike solid malignancies. Systemic treatments, including chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy, are the standard of care with excellent results. The considerable progress made in the management of these diseases in the last 20years has redefined the role of radiation therapy as minor in many clinical situations. We propose a literature review of data, showing that radiation therapy still has a role in curative, salvage, and palliative therapy situations. MATERIAL AND METHODS A document and literature search was carried out in the following databases: Medline and ClinicalTrial.gov, for the terms "radiotherapy", "haematologic malignancies", "Hodgkin lymphoma", "non-Hodgkin lymphoma", "CAR T cells", "multiple myeloma", "solitary plasmocytoma", "intensity-modulated radiotherapy", "extracranial stereotactic body radiation therapy" and "proton therapy references". RESULTS Haemopathological malignancies include a wide range of diseases and radiation therapy indications have been assessed over the past 20years. Currently, radiation therapy is indicated for localized disease (solitary plasmocytoma), as an adjuvant (Hodgkin lymphoma), in palliative settings, or after systemic treatment in relapsed patients (chimeric antigen receptor [CAR] T-cells) with a low recurrence burden, which can therefore be considered "oligorecurrence". Radiation therapy, through total body irradiation, has important indications, thanks to its immunomodulatory and/or myeloablative effects. Moreover, recent technological developments have made possible significant improvement in safety, contributing to radiation therapy being positioned in the treatment strategy of several indications. CONCLUSIONS Given the effectiveness of systemic treatments in hematologic malignancies, the oligometastasis stage is of little importance. A curative intent after local radiation therapy, even advanced stage, is possible, both with residual disease for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or solitary plasmocytoma, and even without evidence of disease after chemotherapy for Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The role of new treatments, such as CAR T cells, allows us to consider radiation therapy after systemic treatment of relapsed diseases with low volume recurrence, which can be considered oligorecurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Ollivier
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, centre René-Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France.
| | - K Debbi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre Sein Henri-Mondor, CHU Henri-Mondor, AP-HP, university Paris Est Créteil (Upec), Créteil, France
| | - N-H To
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre Sein Henri-Mondor, CHU Henri-Mondor, AP-HP, university Paris Est Créteil (Upec), Créteil, France; Institut Mondor de recherche biomédicale (IMRB), Inserm U955, i-Biot, Créteil, France
| | - A Cailleteau
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, centre René-Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - S Supiot
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, centre René-Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - A Mervoyer
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, centre René-Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - V Guimas
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, centre René-Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Y Belkacémi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre Sein Henri-Mondor, CHU Henri-Mondor, AP-HP, university Paris Est Créteil (Upec), Créteil, France; Institut Mondor de recherche biomédicale (IMRB), Inserm U955, i-Biot, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Naessens C, Chamois J, Supiot S, Faivre JC, Arnaud A, Thureau S. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for bone oligometastases. Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:111-118. [PMID: 37838605 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/16/2023]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy is effective for the local management of oligometastases (at most five metastases) with a benefit in survival and local control. Most studies on the management of oligometastases focus on all oligometastatic sites in primary cancer and very few focus on a single oligometastatic site. In particular, there are few data on bone oligometastases, which represent one of the preferred sites for secondary cancer locations. This article focuses on the benefit of stereotactic radiotherapy for bone oligometastases of all cancers by histological types, and reviews the results of major studies in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Naessens
- Département de radiothérapie, hôpital Dupuytren, 2, avenue Martin-Luther-King, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - J Chamois
- Institut de cancérologie radiothérapie Brétillien, boulevard de la Routière, 35760 Saint-Grégoire, France
| | - S Supiot
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, centre René-Gauducheau, boulevard Jacques-Monod, 44800 Saint-Herblain, France; Centre de recherche en cancéro-immunologie Nantes/Angers (CRCINA, UMR 892 Inserm), institut de recherche en santé de l'université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - J-C Faivre
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, 6, avenue de Bourgogne, 54519 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - A Arnaud
- Département de radiothérapie, institut Sainte-Catherine, 250, chemin de Baigne-Pieds, 84000 Avignon, France
| | - S Thureau
- Département de radiothérapie et de physique médicale, centre Henri-Becquerel, 1, rue d'Amiens, 76000 Rouen, France; Laboratoire QuantIF, EA4108-Litis, FR CNRS 3638, 1, rue d'Amiens, 76000 Rouen, France.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Guninski RS, Cuccia F, Alongi F, Andratschke N, Belka C, Bellut D, Dahele M, Josipovic M, Kroese TE, Mancosu P, Minniti G, Niyazi M, Ricardi U, Munck Af Rosenschold P, Sahgal A, Tsang Y, Verbakel WFAR, Guckenberger M. Efficacy and safety of SBRT for spine metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis for preparation of an ESTRO practice guideline. Radiother Oncol 2024; 190:109969. [PMID: 37922993 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Advances in characterizing cancer biology and the growing availability of novel targeted agents and immune therapeutics have significantly changed the prognosis of many patients with metastatic disease. Palliative radiotherapy needs to adapt to these developments. In this study, we summarize the available evidence for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of spinal metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using PRISMA methodology, including publications from January 2005 to September 2021, with the exception of the randomized phase III trial RTOG-0631 which was added in April 2023. Re-irradiation was excluded. For meta-analysis, a random-effects model was used to pool the data. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2-test, assuming substantial and considerable as I2 > 50 % and I2 > 75 %, respectively. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS A total of 69 studies assessing the outcomes of 7236 metastases in 5736 patients were analyzed. SBRT for spine metastases showed high efficacy, with a pooled overall pain response rate of 83 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 68 %-94 %), pooled complete pain response of 36 % (95 % CI: 20 %-53 %), and 1-year local control rate of 94 % (95 % CI: 86 %-99 %), although with high levels of heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 93 %, I2 = 86 %, and 86 %, respectively). Furthermore, SBRT was safe, with a pooled vertebral fracture rate of 9 % (95 % CI: 4 %-16 %), pooled radiation induced myelopathy rate of 0 % (95 % CI 0-2 %), and pooled pain flare rate of 6 % (95 % CI: 3 %-17 %), although with mixed levels of heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 92 %, I2 = 0 %, and 95 %, respectively). Only 1.7 % of vertebral fractures required surgical stabilization. CONCLUSION Spine SBRT is characterized by a favorable efficacy and safety profile, providing durable results for pain control and disease control, which is particularly relevant for oligometastatic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R S Guninski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - F Cuccia
- ARNAS Civico Hospital, Radiation Oncology Unit, Palermo, Italy
| | - F Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Department, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Negrar-Verona, Italy. University of Brescia, Italy
| | - N Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - C Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany. Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - D Bellut
- University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Department of Neurosurgery. Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Dahele
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Center Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Josipovic
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - T E Kroese
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - P Mancosu
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Medical Physics Unit, Radiation Oncology department, via Manzoni 56, I-20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - G Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical PathologySapienza University of Rome, Rome; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy
| | - M Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - U Ricardi
- University of Turin, Department of Oncology, Turin, Italy
| | - P Munck Af Rosenschold
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - A Sahgal
- Odette Cancer Center of the Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada
| | - Y Tsang
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, Canada
| | - W F A R Verbakel
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Konishi T, Takano S, Takayashiki T, Kuboki S, Suzuki D, Sakai N, Hosokawa I, Mishima T, Nishino H, Nakada S, Ohtsuka M. Clinical benefits of pulmonary resection for lung metastases from pancreatic cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 409:11. [PMID: 38108917 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03198-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Systemic chemotherapy is generally used for metastatic pancreatic cancer; however, pulmonary resection may be a treatment option for lung oligometastases from pancreatic cancer. The current study aimed to clarify the oncological outcomes and clinical benefits of pulmonary resection for lung metastases. METHODS Of 510 patients who underwent pancreatic resection for pancreatic cancer, 44 patients with recurrence of isolated lung metastases and one patient with simultaneous lung metastases were evaluated. RESULTS Of the 45 patients, 20 patients were selected as candidates for pulmonary resection based on clinical factors such as recurrence-free interval (RFI) from pancreatectomy to lung metastases, number of lung metastases, and serum CA19-9 level. The post-recurrent survival of patients with pulmonary resection was significantly better than that of patients without pulmonary resection. Fourteen of the 20 patients with pulmonary resection developed tumor recurrence with a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 15 months. Univariate analyses revealed that an RFI from pancreatectomy to lung metastases of ≥28 months was associated with better DFS after pulmonary resection. Of the 14 patients with an RFI of ≥28 months, pulmonary resection resulted in prolonged chemotherapy-free interval in 12 patients. Furthermore, repeat pulmonary resection for recurrent tumors after pulmonary resection led to further cancer-free interval in some cases. CONCLUSIONS Although many patients had tumor recurrence after pulmonary resection, pulmonary resection for lung metastases from pancreatic cancer may provide prolonged cancer-free interval without the need for chemotherapy. Pulmonary resection should be performed for the patients with a long RFI from pancreatectomy to lung metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takanori Konishi
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shigetsugu Takano
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Takayashiki
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kuboki
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Daisuke Suzuki
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Nozomu Sakai
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Isamu Hosokawa
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Mishima
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hitoe Nishino
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Nakada
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masayuki Ohtsuka
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cuccia F, Pastorello E, Franzese C, Belgioia L, Bignardi M, Federico M, Figlia V, Giaj Levra N, Badellino S, Borghetti P, Marvaso G, Montesi G, Pontoriero A, Fazio I, Ferrera G, Alongi F, Scorsetti M. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spine Oligometastases: A Multicentre Retrospective Study From the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO). Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:794-800. [PMID: 37714793 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spine oligometastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a multicentre retrospective study of a series of patients who received SBRT for spine oligometastases. The efficacy of SBRT was evaluated in terms of local control as the primary endpoint. Survival outcomes were also analysed to identify predictive factors for clinical outcomes. Toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE v4.0. RESULTS Between March 2018 and July 2022, 183 lesions in 177 patients were analysed. In most patients, SBRT was delivered to a single spine metastasis (82%) for a median total dose of 21 Gy (14-35 Gy) in three fractions (one to five fractions) and a median BED10 = 119 Gy (57.7-152 Gy). Local control rates were 90.3% at 1 year, 84.3% at 2 years and 84.3% at 3 years. Distant progression-free survival rates were 33.1%, 18.5% and 12.4% at 1, 2 and 3 years, with prostate histology (P = 0.023), oligorecurrent disease (P = 0.04) and BED10 > 100 Gy (P = 0.04) found to be predictive on univariate analysis. A further oligometastatic progression was observed in 33 patients (18.6%) treated with a second course of SBRT, reporting at univariate analysis improved overall survival rates (P = 0.01). Polymetastases-free survival rates were 57.8%, 43.4% and 32.4%; concurrent therapy was related to improved outcomes at multivariate analysis (P = 0.009). Overall survival rates were 91.8%, 79.6% and 65.9%, with prostate histology and non-cervical metastases related to better overall survival at multivariate analysis. Pain-flare after SBRT was recorded in 3.3%; five patients underwent surgical decompression after SBRT; there were no grade ≥3 adverse events. CONCLUSIONS In our experience of only oligometastatic patients, spine SBRT gave excellent results in terms of safety and efficacy. Prostate histology and oligorecurrent disease were predictive factors for improved clinical outcomes; also, patients who experienced a further oligoprogression after SBRT maintained a survival advantage compared with polymetastatic progression. No severe adverse events were reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Cuccia
- Radiotherapy Unit, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy.
| | - E Pastorello
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella (VR), Italy
| | - C Franzese
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Milan, Italy
| | - L Belgioia
- Radiation Oncology Department, San Martino Teaching Hospital, Genova University (DISSAL), Genoa, Italy
| | - M Bignardi
- Radiation Oncology Center, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - M Federico
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Clinica Macchiarella, Palermo, Italy
| | - V Figlia
- Radiotherapy Unit, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - N Giaj Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella (VR), Italy
| | - S Badellino
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - P Borghetti
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - G Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - G Montesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Santa Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - A Pontoriero
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental and Morphological and Functional Imaging Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - I Fazio
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Clinica Macchiarella, Palermo, Italy
| | - G Ferrera
- Radiotherapy Unit, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - F Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella (VR), Italy; University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - M Scorsetti
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ciérvide R, Hernando O, López M, Montero Á, Zucca D, Sánchez E, Álvarez B, García-Aranda M, Chen Zhao X, Valero J, Alonso R, Martí J, de la Casa MÁ, Alonso L, García J, Garcia de Acilu P, Prado A, Fernandez Leton P, Rubio C. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases: 12 years of a single center experience. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:3395-3404. [PMID: 37058207 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03188-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical outcomes of patients with spine metastases treated with SBRT at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with spine metastases treated with SBRT (1 fraction/18 Gy or 5 fractions/7 Gy) during the last 12 years have been analyzed. All patients were simulated supine in a vacuum cushion or with a shoulder mask. CT scans and MRI image registration were performed. Contouring was based on International Spine-Radiosurgery-Consortium-Consensus-Guidelines. Highly conformal-techniques (IMRT/VMAT) were used for treatment planning. Intra and interfraction (CBCT or X-Ray-ExacTrac) verification were mandatory. RESULTS From February 2010 to January 2022, 129 patients with spinal metastases were treated with SBRT [1 fraction/18 Gy (75%) or 5 fractions/7 Gy] (25%). For patients with painful metastases (74/129:57%), 100% experienced an improvement in pain after SBRT. With a median follow-up of 14.2 months (average 22.9; range 0.5-140) 6 patients (4.6%) experienced local relapse. Local progression-free survival was different, considering metastases's location (p < 0.04). The 1, 2 and 3 years overall survival (OS) were 91.2%, 85.1% and 83.2%, respectively. Overall survival was significantly better for patients with spine metastases of breast and prostate cancers compared to other tumors (p < 0.05) and significantly worse when visceral metastases were present (p < 0.05), when patients were metastatic de novo (p < 0.05), and in those patients receiving single fraction SBRT (p: 0.01). CONCLUSIONS According to our experience, SBRT for patients with spinal metastases was effective in terms of local control and useful to reach pain relief. Regarding the intent of the treatment, an adequate selection of patients is essential to propose this ablative approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Ciérvide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Ovidio Hernando
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mercedes López
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ángel Montero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Zucca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Emilio Sánchez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Álvarez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mariola García-Aranda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Xin Chen Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jeannette Valero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosa Alonso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jaime Martí
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Ángel de la Casa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Leire Alonso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan García
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paz Garcia de Acilu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alejandro Prado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pedro Fernandez Leton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmen Rubio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Franzese C, Lucchini R, Roghi M, Badalamenti M, Baldaccini D, Comito T, Franceschini D, Navarria P, Di Cristina L, Lo Faro L, Galdieri C, Reggiori G, Mancosu P, Tomatis S, Scorsetti M. Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: The Role of Three-Dimensional Tumour Volume in Patient Survival. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:e649-e656. [PMID: 37775459 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The definition of oligometastatic prostate cancer (OPCa) is currently based solely on the maximum number of detectable metastases, as there are no validated biomarkers available. The aim of this study was to identify novel predictive factors for OPCa patients who underwent metastases-directed therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS This monocentre, retrospective study included consecutive OPCa patients with a maximum of five metastases in up to two organs, detected with choline- or PSMA-positron emission tomography, who were treated with metastases-directed stereotactic body radiation therapy. Endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival, assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression was carried out to evaluate the association between clinical factors and survival outcomes. RESULTS Between 2009 and 2021, 163 patients and 320 metastases were treated with 226 stereotactic body radiation therapy courses. The median three-dimensional metastatic tumour volume was 4.1 cm3, with a range from 0.01 to 233.4 cm3. In total, 87 (53.4%), 21 (12.9%) and 55 (33.7%) metastases were classified as cN1, cM1a and cM1b, respectively. The median follow-up was 28.5 months. The rates of overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years were 89.5% (95% confidence interval 83.4-93.4), 74.9% (95% confidence interval 66.1-81.7) and 57.2% (95% confidence interval 45.8-67.1), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that overall survival reduced with the increase in three-dimensional total tumour volume (hazard ratio 1.93, 95% confidence interval 1.06-3.52; P = 0.030) and confirmed a significant difference between cN1 versus cM1a-b disease (hazard ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 1.01-3.25; P = 0.046). The cut-off value of total volume correlated with the highest risk of death was 20 cm3 (hazard ratio 2.37, 95% confidence interval 1.34-4.18; P = 0.003). The median progression-free survival was 17.8 months, with 1-, 3- and 5-year rates of 63.7% (95% confidence interval 55.4-70.9), 31.5% (95% confidence interval 22.8-40.6) and 24.7% (95% confidence interval 16.0-34.3). CONCLUSIONS This study identified three-dimensional total tumour volume and the site of oligometastases as significant predictors of survival in OPCa patients treated with metastases-directed therapy. These parameters can potentially be used to personalised treatment and improve patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Franzese
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy.
| | - R Lucchini
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - M Roghi
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - M Badalamenti
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - D Baldaccini
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - T Comito
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - D Franceschini
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - P Navarria
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - L Di Cristina
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - L Lo Faro
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - C Galdieri
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - G Reggiori
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - P Mancosu
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - S Tomatis
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - M Scorsetti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hernando-Requejo O, Chen X, López M, Sánchez E, García J, García P, Alonso R, Montero A, Ciervide R, Álvarez B, Zucca D, García Aranda M, Valero J, Fernández Letón P, Rubio C. Real-world effectiveness and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver metastases with different respiratory motion management techniques. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:1000-1010. [PMID: 37728734 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02147-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been firmly established as a treatment choice for patients with oligometastases, as it has demonstrated both safety and efficacy by consistently achieving high rates of local control. Moreover, it offers potential survival benefits for carefully selected patients in real-world clinical settings. METHODS Between January 2008 and May 2020, a total of 149 patients (with 414 liver metastases) received treatment. The Active Breathing Coordinator device was used for 68 patients, while respiratory gating was used for 65 and abdominal compression was used for 16 patients. The most common histological finding was colorectal adenocarcinoma, with 37.6% of patients having three or more metastases, and 18% having two metastases. The prescribed dose ranged from 36 to 60 Gy, delivered in 3-5 fractions. RESULTS Local control rates at 2 and 3 years were 76.1% and 61.2%, respectively, with no instances of local recurrence after 3 years. Factors negatively impacting local control included colorectal histology, lower prescribed dose, and the occurrence of new liver metastases. The median overall survival from SBRT was 32 months, with the presence of metastases outside the liver and the development of new liver metastases after SBRT affecting survival. The median disease-free survival was 10 months. No substantial differences in both local control and survival were observed between the respiratory motion control techniques employed. Treatment tolerance was excellent, with only one patient experiencing acute grade IV thrombocytopenia and two patients suffering from ≥ grade II chronic toxicity. CONCLUSION For radical management of single or multiple liver metastases, SBRT is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option. Regardless of the technology employed, experienced physicians can achieve similarly positive outcomes. However, additional studies are required to elucidate prognostic factors that can facilitate improved patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Hernando-Requejo
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Puerta del Sur, Madrid, Spain.
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain.
| | - X Chen
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Puerta del Sur, Madrid, Spain
| | - M López
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Sánchez
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - J García
- Radiation Physics Department, University Hospital HM Puerta del Sur, Madrid, Spain
| | - P García
- Radiation Physics Department, University Hospital HM Puerta del Sur, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Alonso
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Puerta del Sur, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Montero
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Ciervide
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - B Álvarez
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - D Zucca
- Radiation Physics Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - M García Aranda
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Valero
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Fernández Letón
- Radiation Physics Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - C Rubio
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Puerta del Sur, Madrid, Spain
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Inoue K, Mizuma M, Motoi F, Kokumai T, Sato H, Kusaka A, Aoki S, Iseki M, Douchi D, Miura T, Maeda S, Ishida M, Ohtsuka H, Nakagawa K, Kamei T, Unno M. CA19-9 With Two-stage Resection Is Useful for Conversion Surgery in PDAC With Synchronous Oligometastases. Anticancer Res 2023; 43:5223-5234. [PMID: 37909951 DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.16724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with synchronous oligometastases may indicate a surgical benefit after chemotherapy. We investigated whether primary and metastatic resection of PDAC with oligometastases can improve the survival and then explored prognostic factors to identify indications for conversion surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed 425 patients with PDAC who underwent pancreatic resection from 2005 to 2019. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed. Two-stage resection was defined as preceding metastasectomy and subsequent primary resection after chemotherapy. RESULTS Fifteen patients (3.5%) had synchronous oligometastases. We evaluated the overall survival of the patients with oligometastases and those without metastases. The survival curves almost completely overlapped (median survival time: 35.9 vs. 32.1 months). The univariate Cox regression analysis revealed a normal level of preoperative CA19-9 (p=0.075), two-stage resection (p=0.072), and R0 resection (p=0.064) were likely promising prognostic factors. The combination of a normal level of preoperative CA19-9 with two-stage resection was a significant prognostic factor (p=0.038). In addition, patients with a normal preoperative CA19-9 level and two-stage resection had better survival (46.1 vs. 28.1 months, p=0.026). CONCLUSION The combination of normal preoperative CA19-9 with two-stage resection can be a useful way to identify patients with PDAC and oligometastases for surgical indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koetsu Inoue
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan;
- Department of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masamichi Mizuma
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Fuyuhiko Motoi
- Department of Surgery, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Takashi Kokumai
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Hideaki Sato
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Akiko Kusaka
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Shuichi Aoki
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Masahiro Iseki
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Daisuke Douchi
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Takayuki Miura
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Shimpei Maeda
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Masaharu Ishida
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Hideo Ohtsuka
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kei Nakagawa
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Takashi Kamei
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Michiaki Unno
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Xin Z, Liu Q, Ai D, Chen K, Mariamidze E, Sumon MA, Devnani B, Pihlak R, Zhu H, Zhao K. Radiotherapy for Advanced Esophageal Cancer: from Palliation to Curation. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:1568-1579. [PMID: 37812321 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01134-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Esophageal cancer is a global health problem, which is 7th most common and 6th most deadly cancer. It has been the era of immuno-oncology for esophageal cancer management. Radiation therapy has been one of the key local therapeutic approaches for esophageal cancer treatment, while its role in advanced disease is challenging and debatable. There have been emerging clinical and translational studies of radiation therapy in recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer. Immunotherapy has been established the standard care of 1st and 2nd line systemic therapies of advanced esophageal cancer, and the development of tumor immunity has opened a new chapter for the esophageal cancer radiation therapy. The current review will summarize the classic radiation therapy research in advanced esophageal cancer, as well as the most recent key findings. The subtitles will cover palliative radiotherapy for dysphagia, re-radiation for recurrent disease, oligo-focal disease management and stereotactic radiation therapy, and radiotherapy with immunotherapy. Radiotherapy plays vital role in multidisciplinary management of advanced EC. External or intratumoral irradiation has been used for palliation of dysphagia and improving QOL in esophageal cancer patients traditionally, while recent clinical and technical advance enables radiotherapy to be considered in recurrent or metastatic disease for curation attention. Novel clinical and translational investigation is opening a new chapter of radiotherapy with immunotherapy for benefiting advanced EC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuocheng Xin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, 270 DongAn Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Qi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, 270 DongAn Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Dashan Ai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, 270 DongAn Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Ke Chen
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Endoscopy, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Elene Mariamidze
- Oncology and Hematology Department, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine After Academician F. Todua, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Mostafa Aziz Sumon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kurmitola General Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Bharti Devnani
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rille Pihlak
- Medical Oncology Department, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Hongcheng Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China.
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, 270 DongAn Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Kuaile Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China.
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, 270 DongAn Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nagpal SK, Khabra K, Ross G, Kirby AM. Ten-Year Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: Does Synchronous Oligometastatic Breast Cancer Benefit? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:736-743. [PMID: 37684189 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The benefit of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in metachronous oligometastatic breast cancer (OMBC) has previously been described and its use in current clinical practice is established. The role of SBRT in the management of synchronous OMBC remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of SBRT-treated synchronous OMBC with those of SBRT-treated metachronous OMBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive extracranial OMBC patients treated with SBRT at a single institution between 2011 and 2022. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, local control and distant control. Log-rank tests were used to test any differences. Cox regression was used for univariate and multivariate analyses to identify predictive factors. Toxicity was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5. RESULTS In total, 74 OMBC patients with 113 lesions were analysed. The median follow-up was 20 months (range 0-98). Seventy per cent of patients presented metachronously and 30% synchronously. 30 Gy in three fractions was most commonly prescribed, resulting in a median biologically effective dose (BED at α/β = 10) of 60 Gy (range 35.7-112.5 Gy). Forty-nine per cent of patients switched systemic therapy post-SBRT (median time to switch: 14 months, range 0-79). Two patients (2%) experienced grade 3 acute toxicities with no grade ≥4 toxicities. At 2 years overall survival was 92.4% and PFS 39.0%, local control 85.9% and distant control 37.0%. For metachronous and synchronous disease, respectively, 2-year local control rates were 86.5% and 85.8% and PFS rates were 35.3% and 48.3%. The median PFS of metachronous and synchronous disease were 18 months and 17 months, respectively (P = 0.86). Predictive factors on multivariate analysis were treated site for overall survival, change in systemic therapy post-SBRT for PFS and BED for local control. CONCLUSION Our data confirm SBRT as a well-tolerated treatment for OMBC with excellent local control rates regardless of metachronous or synchronous presentation. There is no suggestion that survival outcomes are inferior for synchronous disease. Further prospective studies are required to validate this finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S K Nagpal
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - K Khabra
- Research Data and Statistics Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - G Ross
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A M Kirby
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ost P, Siva S, Brabrand S, Dirix P, Liefhooghe N, Otte FX, Gomez-Iturriaga A, Everaerts W, Shelan M, Conde-Moreno A, López Campos F, Papachristofilou A, Guckenberger M, Scorsetti M, Zapatero A, Villafranca Iturre AE, Eito C, Couñago F, Muto P, Van De Voorde L, Mach N, Bultijnck R, Fonteyne V, Moon D, Thon K, Mercier C, Achard V, Stellamans K, Goetghebeur E, Reynders D, Zilli T. PEACE V-Salvage Treatment of OligoRecurrent nodal prostate cancer Metastases (STORM): Acute Toxicity of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial. Eur Urol Oncol 2023:S2588-9311(23)00199-2. [PMID: 37821242 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment recommendations for patients with limited nodal recurrences are lacking, and different locoregional treatment approaches are currently being used. OBJECTIVE The aim of this trial is to compare metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) with or without elective nodal pelvic radiotherapy (ENRT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS PEACE V-Salvage Treatment of OligoRecurrent nodal prostate cancer Metastases (STORM) is an international, phase 2, open-label, randomized, superiority trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03569241). Patients diagnosed with positron emission tomography-detected pelvic nodal oligorecurrence (five or fewer nodes) following radical local treatment for prostate cancer were randomized in a 1:1 ratio between arm A (MDT and 6 mo of androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) and arm B (ENRT [25 × 1.8 Gy] with MDT and 6 mo of ADT). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We report the secondary endpoint acute toxicity, defined as worst grade ≥2 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity within 3 mo of treatment. The chi-square test was used to compare toxicity between treatment arms. We also compare the quality of life (QoL) using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ C30 and PR25 questionnaires. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Between June 2018 and April 2021, 196 patients were assigned randomly to MDT or ENRT. Ninety-seven of 99 patients allocated to MDT and 93 of 97 allocated to ENRT received per-protocol treatment. Worst acute GI toxicity proportions were as follows: grade ≥2 events in three (3%) in the MDT group versus four (4%) in the ENRT group (p = 0.11). Worst acute GU toxicity proportions were as follows: grade ≥2 events in eight (8%) in the MDT group versus 12 (13%) in the ENRT group (p = 0.95). We observed no significant difference between the study groups in the proportion of patients with a clinically significant QoL reduction from baseline for any subdomain score area. CONCLUSIONS No clinically meaningful differences were observed in worst grade ≥2 acute GI or GU toxicity or in QoL subdomains between MDT and ENRT. PATIENT SUMMARY We found no evidence of differential acute bowel or urinary side effects using metastasis-directed therapy and elective nodal radiotherapy for the treatment of patients with a pelvic lymph node recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Iridium Netwerk, GZA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Shankar Siva
- EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; ICON Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Piet Dirix
- Iridium Netwerk, GZA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | | | - Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga
- Hospital Universitario Cruces, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Wouter Everaerts
- LICR, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven & University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, IRCSS, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | | | - Clara Eito
- Instituto Oncólogico Clinica Universitaria IMQ, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Felipe Couñago
- University Hospital Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paolo Muto
- Napoli Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Nicolas Mach
- Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Renée Bultijnck
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Daniel Moon
- Royal Melbourne Clinical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kristian Thon
- EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; ICON Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Vérane Achard
- Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Els Goetghebeur
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Dries Reynders
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lee J, Kim JA, An TJ, Lee H, Han EJ, Sa YJ, Kim HR, Park CK, Kim TJ, Lim JU. Optimal timing for local ablative treatment of bone oligometastases in non-small cell lung cancer. J Bone Oncol 2023; 42:100496. [PMID: 37589036 PMCID: PMC10425942 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2023.100496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Oligometastases is a term commonly used to describe a disease state characterized by a limited number of distant metastases, and represents a transient phase between localized and widespread systemic diseases. This subgroup of stage IV cancer has increased in clinical importance due to the possibility of curative rather than palliative treatment. Among advanced lung cancer patients, 30-40% show bone metastases, and can show complications such as pathological fractures. Many prospective studies have shown efficacy of localized treatment in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in improving progression-free survival and overall survival. Compared to metastases in other organs, bone metastases are unique in terms of tumor microenvironment and clinical outcomes. Radiotherapy is the most frequently used treatment modality for local ablative treatment for both primary and metastatic lesions. Stereotactic body radiation therapy demonstrated more rapid and effective pain control compared to conventional 3D conformal radiotherapy. Radiotherapy improved outcomes in terms of time-to-skeletal related events skeletal-related events (SRE), hospitalization for SRE, pain relief, and overall survival in patients with bone metastases. Decision on timing of local ablative treatment depends on patient's overall clinical status, treatment goals, potential side effects of each approach, and expected initial responses to systemic anti-cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayoung Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Catholic University of Korea, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul 150-713, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung A. Kim
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 150-713, Republic of Korea
- Outpatient Department of Respiratory Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 150-713, Republic of Korea
| | - Tai Joon An
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 150-713, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyochun Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Catholic University of Korea, St. Vincent's Hospital, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Ji Han
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 150-713, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Jo Sa
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 150-713, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyo Rim Kim
- Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 150-713, Republic of Korea
| | - Chan Kwon Park
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 150-713, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae-Jung Kim
- Department of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 150-713, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Uk Lim
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 150-713, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Li J, Wang Y, Huo L, Huang X, Shi L, Huang L, Chen K, Cao X. Definitive irradiation as a first treatment strategy for primary and metastatic sites of newly diagnosed IVB cervical cancer that presented with synchronous oligometastases. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:159. [PMID: 37752606 PMCID: PMC10521549 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02320-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The present study identified survival and progression-free rates and evaluated prognostic factors for IVB stage cervical cancer in patients that presented with synchronous oligometastases (sync-oligometastases) who received definitive irradiation for primary and metastatic sites. METHODS The study retrospectively included 60 patients with newly diagnosed stage IVB cervical cancer. Patients received definitive radiation for both primary and metastatic sites through Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) or intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) followed by three dimensional-intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy at our institution between July 2014 to December 2020. All patients were staged based on the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 guidelines. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and patient prognostic factors were analyzed. RESULTS The 60 patients who received curative-intent irradiation for primary and metastatic sites showed a 5-year OS rate of 51.4% and a 5-year PFS rate of 25.9%. The median PFS was 52.3 months, and the median OS had not been reached. Lymphatic metastases had a better OS compared with hematogenous metastases (3-year OS rates: 57.2% vs. 20%, p = 0.017). Patients with one metastasis site showed a more favorable prognosis than patients with ≥ 2 metastases sites (3-year OS rates: 60.4% vs. 20.6%, p = 0.003). Patients that presented with tumors larger than 4 cm in diameter before treatment demonstrated a poorer prognosis (5-year OS rates: 41.2% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.029; 5-year PFS rates: 10.4% vs. 53.7%, p = 0.021). CONCLUSION Definitive irradiation for both primary and oligo-metastatic sites for selected IVB patients is a feasible treatment strategy. Metastatic type, number of metastatic sites, and pre-treatment tumor diameter were significant prognostic factors. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the lymph nodal metastatic type (supraclavicular or inguinal), and number of lymphatic metastatic sites failed to reach statistical significance as prognostic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junyun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Lanqing Huo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Xiaodan Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Liu Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Lin Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Kai Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China.
| | - Xinping Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cao Y, Chen H, Sahgal A, Erler D, Badellino S, Biswas T, Dagan R, Foote MC, Louie AV, Poon I, Ricardi U, Redmond KJ. The impact of local control on widespread progression and survival in oligometastasis-directed SBRT: Results from a large international database. Radiother Oncol 2023; 186:109769. [PMID: 37385379 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigated the impact of local control (LC) on widespread progression (WSP) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated to all extracranial oligometastases (OMs) at presentation to SBRT in this retrospective review across 6 international centers. MATERIALS/METHODS Relationships between LC status of SBRT-directed OMs and OS and WSP (>5 new active/untreated lesions) were explored using Cox and Fine-Gray regression models, adjusting for radioresistant histology and pre-SBRT systemic therapy receipt. The association between LC and dosimetric predictors was analyzed with competing risk regression using death as a competing risk and across a wide range of simulated α/βratios. RESULTS In total, 1700 OMs in 1033 patients were analyzed, with 25.2% NSCLC, 22.7% colorectal, 12.8% prostate, and 8.1% breast histology. Patients who failed locally in any SBRT-directed OM within 6 mo were at 3.6-fold higher risk of death and 2.7-fold higher risk of WSP compared to those who remained locally-controlled (p < 0.001). Similar associations existed for each duration of LC investigated through 3 yrs post-SBRT. There was no significant difference in risk of WSP or death between patients who failed in a subset of SBRT-treated lesions vs. patients who failed in all lesions. Minimum dose (Dmin) to the GTV/ITV was most predictive of LC when compared to prescription dose, PTV Dmin, and PTV Dmax. Sensitivity analysis for achieving 1-yr LC > 95% found thresholds of 41.2 Gy and 55.2 Gy in 5 fractions for smaller (< 27.7 cc) and larger radioresistant lesions, respectively. CONCLUSION This large multinational cohort suggests that the duration of LC following OM-directed SBRT strongly correlates with WSP and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yilin Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hanbo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Darby Erler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Tithi Biswas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Roi Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Matthew C Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ian Poon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Kristin J Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Klement RJ, Sweeney RA. Metabolic factors associated with the prognosis of oligometastatic patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2023; 42:927-940. [PMID: 37261610 DOI: 10.1007/s10555-023-10110-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Over the past two decades, it has been established that cancer patients with oligometastases, i.e., only a few detectable metastases confined to one or a few organs, may benefit from an aggressive local treatment approach such as the application of high-precision stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Specifically, some studies have indicated that achieving long-term local tumor control of oligometastases is associated with prolonged overall survival. This motivates investigations into which factors may modify the dose-response relationship of SBRT by making metastases more or less radioresistant. One such factor relates to the uptake of the positron emission tomography tracer 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) which reflects the extent of tumor cell glycolysis or the Warburg effect, respectively. Here we review the biological mechanisms how the Warburg effect drives tumor cell radioresistance and metastasis and draw connections to clinical studies reporting associations between high FDG uptake and worse clinical outcomes after SBRT for oligometastases. We further review the evidence for distinct metabolic phenotypes of metastases preferentially seeding to specific organs and their possible translation into distinct radioresistance. Finally, evidence that obesity and hyperglycemia also affect outcomes after SBRT will be presented. While delivered dose is the main determinant of a high local tumor control probability, there might be clinical scenarios when metabolic targeting could make the difference between achieving local control or not, for example when doses have to be compromised in order to spare neighboring high-risk organs, or when tumors are expected to be highly therapy-resistant due to heavy pretreatment such as chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rainer J Klement
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Robert-Koch-Straße 10, 97422, Schweinfurt, Germany.
| | - Reinhart A Sweeney
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Robert-Koch-Straße 10, 97422, Schweinfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Franzese C, Vernier V, Franceschini D, Comito T, Navarria P, Clerici E, Teriaca MA, Massaro M, Di Cristina L, Marini B, Galdieri C, Mancosu P, Tomatis S, Scorsetti M. Total tumor volume as a predictor of survival in patients with multiple oligometastases treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:10495-10503. [PMID: 37280407 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04964-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delivering stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with multiple oligometastases represents a challenge for clinical and technical reasons. We aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients affected by multiple oligometastases treated with SABR and the impact of tumor volume on survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS We included all the patients treated with single course SABR for 3 to 5 extracranial oligometastases. All patients were treated with the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique with ablative intent. End-points of the analysis were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), local control (LC) and toxicity. RESULTS 136 patients were treated from 2012 to 2020 on 451 oligometastases. Most common primary tumor was colorectal cancer (44.1%) followed by lung cancer (11.8%). A total of 3, 4 and 5 lesions were simultaneously treated in 102 (75.0%), 26 (19.1%), and 8 (5.9%) patients, respectively. Median total tumor volume (TTV) was 19.1 cc (range 0.6-245.1). With a median follow-up of 25.0 months, OS at 1 and 3 years was 88.4% and 50.2%, respectively. Increasing TTV was independent predictive factor of worse OS (HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.18-4.78, p = 0.014) and PFS (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.05-2.54; p = 0.028). Median OS was 80.6 months if tumor volume was ≤ 10 cc (1 and 3 years OS rate 93.6% and 77.5%, respectively), and 31.1 months if TTV was higher than 10 cc (1 and 3 years OS rate 86.7% and 42.3%, respectively). Rates of LC at 1 and 3 years were 89.3% and 76.5%. In terms of toxicity, no grade 3 or higher toxicity was reported both in the acute and late settings. CONCLUSION We demonstrated the impact of tumor volume on survival and disease control of patients affected by multiple oligometastases treated with single course SABR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciro Franzese
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy.
| | - Veronica Vernier
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Franceschini
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Tiziana Comito
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Clerici
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Ausilia Teriaca
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Massaro
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Luciana Di Cristina
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Beatrice Marini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Carmela Galdieri
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Mancosu
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Tomatis
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kobayashi S, Bando H, Taketomi A, Takamoto T, Shinozaki E, Shiozawa M, Hara H, Yamazaki K, Komori K, Matsuhashi N, Kato T, Kagawa Y, Yokota M, Oki E, Komine K, Takahashi S, Wakabayashi M, Yoshino T. NEXUS trial: a multicenter phase II clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the perioperative use of encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab in patients with previously untreated surgically resectable BRAF V600E mutant colorectal oligometastases. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:779. [PMID: 37605122 PMCID: PMC10440878 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11311-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal treatment strategy for resectable BRAF V600E mutant colorectal oligometastases (CRM) has not been established due to the rarity and rapid progression of the disease. Since the unresectable recurrence rate is high, development of novel perioperative therapies are warranted. On December 2020, the BEACON CRC triplet regimen of encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab was approved for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan. METHODS The NEXUS trial is a multicenter phase II clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the perioperative use of encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab in patients with previously untreated surgically resectable BRAF V600E mutant CRM. The key inclusion criteria are as follows: histologically diagnosed with colorectal adeno/adenosquamous carcinoma; RAS wild-type and BRAF V600E mutation by tissue or blood; and previously untreated resectable distant metastases. The triplet regimen (encorafenib: 300 mg daily; binimetinib: 45 mg twice daily; cetuximab: 400 mg/m2, then 250 mg/m2 weekly, 28 days/cycle) is administered for 3 cycles each before and after curative resection. The primary endpoint of the study is the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate and the secondary end points are the PFS, disease-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate. The sample size is 32 patients. Endpoints in the NEXUS trial as well as integrated analysis with the nationwide registry data will be considered for seeking regulatory approval for the perioperative use of the triplet regimen. DISCUSSION The use of the triplet regimen in the perioperative period is expected to be safe and effective in patients with resectable BRAF V600E mutant CRM. TRIAL REGISTRATION jRCT2031220025, April. 16, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shin Kobayashi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 2770882, Japan.
| | - Hideaki Bando
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Akinobu Taketomi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Takamoto
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eiji Shinozaki
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Department, The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Manabu Shiozawa
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hiroki Hara
- Gastroenterological Department, Saitama Cancer Center, Ina, Japan
| | - Kentaro Yamazaki
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Koji Komori
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Nobuhisa Matsuhashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Pediatric Surgery, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kato
- Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Kagawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Yokota
- Department of General Surgery, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Eiji Oki
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Keigo Komine
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Masashi Wakabayashi
- Division for the Promotion of Drug and Diagnostic Development, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Takayuki Yoshino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Levy A, Khalifa J, Martin E, Botticella A, Quevrin C, Lavaud P, Aldea M, Besse B, Planchard D, Barlesi F, Deutsch E, Massabeau C, Doyen J, Le Péchoux C. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for extra-cranial oligoprogressive or oligorecurrent small-cell lung cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 41:100637. [PMID: 37206411 PMCID: PMC10189362 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The role of local ablative treatments, including stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), is an area of active research in oligometastatic patients. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a poor prognosis, with common diffuse metastatic evolution. We evaluated the outcomes after SBRT in uncommon oligoprogressive/oligorecurrent SCLC presentation. Methods Data of SCLC patients who received SBRT for oligoprogressive/oligorecurrent metastatic disease at four centers were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with synchronous oligometastatic disease, SBRT for primary lung tumor and brain radiosurgery were not included. Relapse and survival rates were defined as the time between the date of SBRT and the first event. Results Twenty patients (60% with initially limited-disease [LD]) presenting 24 lesions were identified. Oligoprogression and oligorecurrence were observed in 6/20 (30%) and 14/20 (70%) patients, respectively. SBRT was delivered to one (n = 16) to two (n = 4) lesions (median size, 26 mm), mainly to lung [n = 17/24] metastases. At a median follow-up of 2.9 years, no local relapse was observed and 15/20 patients experienced a distant relapse (DR). The median DR and OS were 4.5 months (95 %CI: 2.9-13.7 months) and 17.2 months (95 %CI: 7.5-65.2 months), respectively. The 3-year distant control and OS rates were 25% (95 %CI: 6-44%) and 37% (95 %CI: 15-59%), respectively. Initial LD (vs extensive-disease) was the only prognosis factor associated with a lower risk of post-SBRT DR (HR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0-0.88; p = 0.03). There was no severe observed SBRT-related toxicities. Conclusion Prognosis was poor, with DR occurring in most patients. However, local control was excellent and long term response after SBRT may rarely occur in patients with oligoprogressive/oligorecurrent SCLC. Local ablative treatments should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting on well-selected cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonin Levy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
- Corresponding author at: Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805 Villejuif, France.
| | - Jonathan Khalifa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France
| | - Etienne Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Unicancer-Georges-Francois Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France
| | - Angela Botticella
- Department of Radiation Oncology, International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Clément Quevrin
- Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Pernelle Lavaud
- Department of Cancer Medicine, International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Mihaela Aldea
- Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- Department of Cancer Medicine, International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Benjamin Besse
- Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- Department of Cancer Medicine, International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - David Planchard
- Department of Cancer Medicine, International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Fabrice Barlesi
- Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- Department of Cancer Medicine, International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Eric Deutsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Carole Massabeau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France
| | - Jérôme Doyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, Fédération Claude-Lalanne, Nice, France
| | - Cécile Le Péchoux
- Department of Radiation Oncology, International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Shi W, Li Y, Sun H, Zhang L, Meng J, Wang X, Chen X, Zhang X, Mei X, Ma J, Mo M, Zhou C, Liang F, Shao Z, Zhang Z, Guo X, Yu X, Yang Z. Favorable prognosis of breast cancer brain metastases patients with limited intracranial and extracranial metastatic lesions. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:107. [PMID: 37393259 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02293-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) are highly heterogenous with widely differing survival. The prognosis of the oligometastatic breast cancer (BC) patients with brain metastases (BM) has not been well studied. We aimed to investigate the prognosis of BCBM patients with limited intracranial and extracranial metastatic lesions. METHODS Four hundred and forty-five BCBM patients treated between 1st January 2008 and 31st December 2018 at our institute were included. Clinical characteristics and treatment information were obtained from patient's medical records. The updated breast Graded Prognostic Assessment (Breast GPA) was calculated. RESULTS The median OS after diagnosis of BM were 15.9 months. Median OS for patients with GPA 0-1.0, 1.5-2, 2.5-3 and 3.5-4 were 6.9, 14.2, 21.8, 42.6 months respectively. The total number of intracranial and extracranial metastatic lesions, in addition to the Breast GPA, salvage local therapy and systemic therapy (anti-HER2 therapy, chemotherapy and endocrine therapy) were demonstrated to be associated with prognosis. One hundred and thirteen patients (25.4%) had 1-5 total metastatic lesions at BM diagnosis. Patients with 1-5 total metastatic lesions had a significantly longer median OS of 24.3 months compared to those with greater than 5 total metastatic lesions with a median OS of 12.2 months (P < 0.001; multivariate HR 0.55, 95% CI, 0.43-0.72). Among the patients with 1-5 metastatic lesions, median OS for GPA 0-1.0 was 9.8 months, compared to 22.8, 28.8 and 71.0 for GPA 1.5-2.0, 2.5-3.0 and 3.5-4.0 respectively, which is much longer than the corresponding patients with greater than 5 total metastatic lesions, with medium OS of 6.8, 11.6, 18.6 and 42.6 months respectively for GPA 0-1.0, 1.5-2.0, 2.5-3.0 and 3.5-4.0. CONCLUSIONS The patients with 1-5 total metastatic lesions demonstrated better OS. The prognostic value of the Breast GPA and the survival benefit of salvage local therapy and continuation of systemic therapy after BM were confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yang Li
- Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, 272029, Shandong, China
| | - Hua Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Li Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Jin Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xiaofang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xingxing Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xiaomeng Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xin Mei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Jinli Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Miao Mo
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Clinical Statistics Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Changming Zhou
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Clinical Statistics Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Fei Liang
- Department of Biostatistics, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhimin Shao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Zhen Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xiaomao Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xiaoli Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Zhaozhi Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Nigam R, Field M, Harris G, Barton M, Carolan M, Metcalfe P, Holloway L. Automated detection, delineation and quantification of whole-body bone metastasis using FDG-PET/CT images. Phys Eng Sci Med 2023; 46:851-863. [PMID: 37126152 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01258-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with the metastatic spread of disease to the bone have high morbidity and mortality. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy increases the progression free survival and overall survival of these patients with oligometastases. FDG-PET/CT, a functional imaging technique combining positron emission tomography (PET) with 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and computer tomography (CT) provides improved staging and identification of treatment response. It is also associated with reduction in size of the radiotherapy tumour volume delineation compared with CT based contouring in radiotherapy, thus allowing for dose escalation to the target volume with lower doses to the surrounding organs at risk. FDG-PET/CT is increasingly being used for the clinical management of NSCLC patients undergoing radiotherapy and has shown high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of bone metastases in these patients. Here, we present a software tool for detection, delineation and quantification of bone metastases using FDG-PET/CT images. The tool extracts standardised uptake values (SUV) from FDG-PET images for auto-segmentation of bone lesions and calculates volume of each lesion and associated mean and maximum SUV. The tool also allows automatic statistical validation of the auto-segmented bone lesions against the manual contours of a radiation oncologist. A retrospective review of FDG-PET/CT scans of more than 30 candidate NSCLC patients was performed and nine patients with one or more metastatic bone lesions were selected for the present study. The SUV threshold prediction model was designed by splitting the cohort of patients into a subset of 'development' and 'validation' cohorts. The development cohort yielded an optimum SUV threshold of 3.0 for automatic detection of bone metastases using FDG-PET/CT images. The validity of the derived optimum SUV threshold on the validation cohort demonstrated that auto-segmented and manually contoured bone lesions showed strong concordance for volume of bone lesion (r = 0.993) and number of detected lesions (r = 0.996). The tool has various applications in radiotherapy, including but not limited to studies determining optimum SUV threshold for accurate and standardised delineation of bone lesions and in scientific studies utilising large patient populations for instance for investigation of the number of metastatic lesions that can be treated safety with an ablative dose of radiotherapy without exceeding the normal tissue toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Nigam
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.
- Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia.
| | - M Field
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - G Harris
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - M Barton
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - M Carolan
- Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia
| | - P Metcalfe
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
| | - L Holloway
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical Campus, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2505, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zhao W, Ke S, Cai X, Zuo Z, Shi W, Qiu H, Cai G, Gong Y, Wu Y, Ruan S, Chen Y. Radiotherapy plus camrelizumaband irinotecan for oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients after first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy failure: An open-label, single-arm, phase II trial. Radiother Oncol 2023; 184:109679. [PMID: 37105302 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of advanced and metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but most patients eventually developed disease progression. Immuno-resistance is becoming an unavoidable clinical problem. Oligometastasis is a limited-metastatic state, and patients at this stage should be evaluated for the addition of metastasis-directed local intervention, which may be associated with improved prognosis. As an immunomodulator, radiotherapy may exhibit synergistic effect when added to immunotherapy. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of low-dose radiotherapy plus immunotherapy and second-line chemotherapy in oligometastatic ESCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this phase II trial (ChiCTR2000040533), oligometastatic ESCC patients after first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy failure were treated with low dose radiotherapy plus camrelizumab and second-line irinotecan chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and safety. Abscopal response rate (ARR) and abscopal control rate (ACR) were also been explored. RESULTS Between November 19, 2018 and March 17, 2021, 49 patients were enrolled. With a median follow-up of 12.8 months, median PFS and OS were 6.9 months (95%CI, 4.6-9.3) and 12.8 months (95%CI, 10.1-15.5), respectively. ORR was 40.8% (95%CI, 27.3-55.7). DCR was 75.5% (95%CI, 60.8-86.2). ARR was 34.7% (95%CI, 22.1-49.7). ACR was 69.4% (95%CI, 54.4-81.3). The most common adverse effects of any grade were myelosuppression, weight loss and fatigue. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 31 (63.3%) patients, with the most common being leukopenia (30.6%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION Low dose radiotherapy plus camrelizumab and irinotecan exhibited survival benefit with manageable safety for oligometastatic ESCC patients after first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy failure. It deserves to be validated in a larger trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wensi Zhao
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Wuhan University Renmin Hospital, Wuhan
| | - Shaobo Ke
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Wuhan University Renmin Hospital, Wuhan
| | - Xiaojun Cai
- Department of Oncology, Shiyan People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Zhigang Zuo
- Department of Oncology, Shiyan People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Wei Shi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Wuhan University Renmin Hospital, Wuhan
| | - Hu Qiu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Wuhan University Renmin Hospital, Wuhan
| | - Gaoke Cai
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Wuhan University Renmin Hospital, Wuhan
| | - Yi Gong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Wuhan University Renmin Hospital, Wuhan
| | - Yong Wu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Wuhan University Renmin Hospital, Wuhan
| | - Shasha Ruan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Wuhan University Renmin Hospital, Wuhan
| | - Yongshun Chen
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Wuhan University Renmin Hospital, Wuhan.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Liu B. [Current Treatment Status and Prospect of Surgery and Thermal Ablation for
Pulmonary Oligometastases in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 2023; 26:238-244. [PMID: 37035886 PMCID: PMC10106791 DOI: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2023.106.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
Oligometastasis can be regarded as a transition state between early metastasis and extensive metastasis (limited tumor load, unique tumor biological behavior). Due to the relatively limited number of metastatic foci and the number of affected organs, there is a potential chance of cure after active systemic and local treatment. With the rapid development of molecular targeted drug therapy and immunotherapy, local therapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including oligorecurrence and oligoprogression, has received increasing attention. In this paper, the relevant research, efficacy, influencing factors, safety and indications of local therapy such as surgery and thermal ablation were discussed.
.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baodong Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ehret F, Kaul D, Kufeld M, Endt CV, Budach V, Senger C, Fürweger C, Haidenberger A, Muacevic A. Robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy for the management of adrenal gland metastases: a bi-institutional analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:1095-1101. [PMID: 35290521 PMCID: PMC9984319 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-03943-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adrenal gland metastases (AGMs) are a common manifestation of metastatic tumor spread, especially in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In patients with a limited systemic tumor burden, effective treatments for AGMs are needed. Due to varying fractionation schemes and limited reports, short-course treatment results for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for AGMs are lacking. This work analyzes the outcomes of short-course SBRT for AGMs. METHODS Patients who underwent robotic SBRT for AGMs with one to five fractions were eligible for analysis. RESULTS In total, data from 55 patients with 72 AGMs from two institutions were analyzed. Most AGMs originated from renal cell carcinoma (38%) and NSCLC (35%). The median follow-up was 16.4 months. The median prescription dose and isodose line were 24 Gy and 70%, respectively. Most patients (85%) received SBRT with just one fraction. The median biologically effective dose assuming an α/β ratio of 10 (BED10) was 80.4 Gy. The local control and progression-free survival after 1 and 2 years were 92.9%, 67.8%, and 46.2%, as well as 24.3%, respectively. Thirteen patients (24%) suffered from grade 1 or 2 toxicities. The BED10 showed a significant impact on LC (p < 0.01). Treatments with a BED10 equal to or above the median were associated with a better LC (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Robotic SBRT is an efficient and safe treatment modality for AGM. Treatment-associated side effects are sporadic and manageable. Results suggest short-course SBRT to be a preferable and time-saving treatment option for the management of AGMs if an adequate BED10 can be safely applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Ehret
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany. .,European Radiosurgery Center, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Charité CyberKnife Center, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Berlin, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Kufeld
- European Radiosurgery Center, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Clara Vom Endt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Charité CyberKnife Center, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Charité CyberKnife Center, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Fürweger
- European Radiosurgery Center, 81377, Munich, Germany.,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Eufemon Cereno R, Mou B, Baker S, Chng N, Arbour G, Bergman A, Liu M, Schellenberg D, Matthews Q, Huang V, Mestrovic A, Hyde D, Alexander A, Carolan H, Hsu F, Miller S, Atrchian S, Chan E, Ho C, Mohamed I, Lin A, Berrang T, Bang A, Jiang W, Lund C, Pai H, Valev B, Lefresne S, Tyldesley S, Olson RA. Should organs at risk (OARs) be prioritized over target volume coverage in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastases? a secondary analysis of the population-based phase II SABR-5 trial. Radiother Oncol 2023; 182:109576. [PMID: 36822355 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastases may improve survival, however concerns about safety remain. To mitigate risk of toxicity, target coverage was sacrificed to prioritize organs-at-risk (OARs) during SABR planning in the population-based SABR-5 trial. This study evaluated the effect of this practice on dosimetry, local recurrence (LR), and progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS This single-arm phase II trial included patients with up to 5 oligometastases between November 2016 and July 2020. Theprotocol-specified planning objective was to cover 95 % of the planning target volume (PTV) with 100 % of the prescribed dose, however PTV coverage was reduced as needed to meet OAR constraints. This trade-off was measured using the coverage compromise index (CCI), computed as minimum dose received by the hottest 99 % of the PTV (D99) divided by the prescription dose. Under-coverage was defined as CCI < 0.90. The potential association between CCI and outcomes was evaluated. RESULTS 549 lesions from 381 patients were assessed. Mean CCI was 0.88 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.86-0.89), and 196 (36 %) lesions were under-covered. The highest mean CCI (0.95; 95 %CI, 0.93-0.97) was in non-spine bone lesions (n = 116), while the lowest mean CCI (0.71; 95 % CI, 0.69-0.73) was in spine lesions (n = 104). On multivariable analysis, under-coverage did not predict for worse LR (HR 0.48, p = 0.37) or PFS (HR 1.24, p = 0.38). Largest lesion diameter, colorectal and 'other' (non-prostate, breast, or lung) primary predicted for worse LR. Largest lesion diameter, synchronous tumor treatment, short disease free interval, state of oligoprogression, initiation or change in systemic treatment, and a high PTV Dmax were significantly associated with PFS. CONCLUSION PTV under-coverage was not associated with worse LR or PFS in this large, population-based phase II trial. Combined with low toxicity rates, this study supports the practice of prioritizing OAR constraints during oligometastatic SABR planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reno Eufemon Cereno
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Benjamin Mou
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sarah Baker
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nick Chng
- British Columbia Cancer, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gregory Arbour
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alanah Bergman
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mitchell Liu
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Devin Schellenberg
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Quinn Matthews
- British Columbia Cancer, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Vicky Huang
- British Columbia Cancer, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ante Mestrovic
- British Columbia Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Derek Hyde
- British Columbia Cancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Abraham Alexander
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Hannah Carolan
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Fred Hsu
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stacy Miller
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Siavash Atrchian
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elisa Chan
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Clement Ho
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Islam Mohamed
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Angela Lin
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Tanya Berrang
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andrew Bang
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Will Jiang
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Chad Lund
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Howard Pai
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Boris Valev
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Shilo Lefresne
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Scott Tyldesley
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Robert A Olson
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Magne N, Milhade N, Sargos P, Bouleftour W. Approaches to Oligometastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:251-256. [PMID: 36808558 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01379-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This study aims to gather the current state of the literature about therapeutic approaches and management of oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma. RECENT FINDINGS Two recent stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) studies gained attention and offered a promising outcome alone or in association with antineoplastic drugs especially in oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma. If one can consider evidence-based medicine as the sole therapeutic option, many unresolved questions are still pending. Thus, therapeutic approaches in oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma are still working. Further phase III clinical trials are urgently needed to validate the last 2 phase II involving SBRT and improve knowledge for defining the right care to the right patient at the right time. In addition, a discussion in a disciplinary consultation meeting remains essential to validate the arrangement between systemic treatments and focal treatments that will best benefit the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Magne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 229 cours de l'Argonne, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
- Cellular and Molecular Radiobiology Laboratory, Lyon-Sud Medical School, Unité Mixte de Recherche CNRS5822/IP2I, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.
| | - Nicolas Milhade
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 229 cours de l'Argonne, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 229 cours de l'Argonne, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Wafa Bouleftour
- Department of Medical Oncology, North Hospital, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Gofrit ON, Gofrit B, Roditi Y, Popovtzer A, Frank S, Sosna J, Goldberg SN. Is it time for redefining oligometastatic disease? Analysis of lung metastases CT in ten tumor types. Discov Oncol 2023; 14:19. [PMID: 36745242 PMCID: PMC9902583 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-023-00625-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oligometastatic disease (OD) is usually defined arbitrarily as a condition in which there are ≤ 5 metastases. Given limited disease, it is expected that patients with OD should have better prognosis compared to other metastatic patients and that they can potentially benefit from metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). In this study, we attempted to redefine OD based upon objective evidence that fulfill these assumptions. METHODS Chest CTSs of 773 patients with 15,947 lung metastases originating from ten malignancy types were evaluated. The number and largest diameter of each metastasis was recorded. Metastatic cluster was defined as a cluster of two or more metastases with diameter difference ≤ 1 mm. The prognostic power of seven statistical models on overall survival (OS) was analyzed. FINDINGS Both the number of metastases and metastatic clusters had a highly significant impact on OS (p < 0.0001, p = 0.003 respectively). Patients with a single metastasis or a single cluster of metastases (regardless of metastases number), equaling 16.2% of all patients, had significantly better prognosis compared to other patients (p = 0.0002). If metastases diameter variability is ignored, as in the standard definition of OD, then patients with 2-5 and 6-10 metastases would have a similar prognosis. INTERPRETATION Patients with a single cluster of metastases, theoretically originating from a single clone, have significantly better prognosis compared to patients with more than one cluster. Using this definition can potentially improve the results of MDT. The upper limit of metastases number should be determined by the technical capabilities of the MDT used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ofer N Gofrit
- Department of Urology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 12000, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel.
| | - Ben Gofrit
- School of Engineering and Computer Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Yuval Roditi
- School of Engineering and Computer Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Aron Popovtzer
- Department of Oncology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Steve Frank
- Department of Oncology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Jacob Sosna
- Department of Radiology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - S Nahum Goldberg
- Department of Radiology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Imoto S, Wang K, Bi XW, Liu G, Im YH, Im SA, Sim SH, Ueno T, Futamura M, Toi M, Fujiwara Y, Ahn SG, Lee JE, Park YH, Takao S, Oba MS, Kitagawa Y, Nishiyama M. Survival advantage of locoregional and systemic therapy in oligometastatic breast cancer: an international retrospective cohort study (OLIGO-BC1). Breast Cancer 2023; 30:412-423. [PMID: 36689066 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-023-01436-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An international retrospective cohort study was conducted to clarify the survival advantage of combination therapy with locoregional and systemic therapy (ST) in oligometastatic breast cancer (BC). METHODS Patients with oligometastatic BC diagnosed from 2007 to 2012 were enrolled in center hospitals in China, Korea and Japan. It was defined as a low-volume metastatic disease at up to five sites and not necessarily in the same organ. Cases with brain, pleural, peritoneal and pericardial metastases were excluded. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from the initial diagnosis of oligometastases. OS was summarized using the Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for clinicopathological factors. RESULTS Among 1,295 cases registered from February 2018 to May 2019, 932 remained for analysis after the exclusion of unavailable cases and locoregional recurrence. One metastatic site was found in 400 cases, 2 in 243, 3 in 130, 4 in 86 and 5 in 73. At the median follow-up of 4.5 years, 5-year OS was 54.7% and 39.7% for 321 cases in the combination therapy group and 611 cases in the ST group, respectively. An adjusted HR was 0.66 (95% confidence interval: 0.55, 0.79). Some types of ST without chemotherapy alone, younger age, ECOG performance status 0, early-stage BC, non-triple negative subtype, fewer metastatic sites and longer duration of surgery to relapse were significantly favorable prognostic factors. CONCLUSION Combination therapy may be considered for longer survival under some conditions in oligometastatic BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kun Wang
- Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital & Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xi-Wen Bi
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guangyu Liu
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Young-Hyuck Im
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Seock-Ah Im
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sung Hoon Sim
- Center for Breast Cancer Korea, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Takayuki Ueno
- Breast Oncology Center, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Masakazu Toi
- Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Sung Gwe Ahn
- Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jeong Eon Lee
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Yeon Hee Park
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | | | - Mari Saito Oba
- Clinical Research and Education Promotion Division, Department of Clinical Data Science, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- Keio University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Sigurdson S, Thibodeau S, Korzeniowski M, Moraes FY. A Precise Approach for Radiotherapy of Breast Cancer. Cancer Treat Res 2023; 188:175-198. [PMID: 38175346 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-33602-7_7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is an integral part of the multidisciplinary management of breast cancer (BC). There have been multiple recent advances in the delivery of radiotherapy, reviewed with a critical discussion of the evidence from trials investigating adjuvant ultra-hypofractionation and partial breast irradiation for early-stage BC, and the locoregional management of lymph nodes in locally advanced BC. Multiple precision medicine-based approaches have been developed as prognostic and/or predictive for BC patients and identifying biomarkers of radioresistance could help identify patients that may benefit from dose-escalated radiotherapy or radiosensitizers. Radiotherapy after breast reconstruction is an area of current controversy in the field, and we evaluated the decision-making considerations in this situation. The oligometastatic state is an emerging field for many cancer sites based on recent trials investigating ablative radiotherapy for oligometastatic BC. This chapter is an overview of radiotherapy for BC, with a focus on recent advances in early-stage, locally advanced, and oligometastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Sigurdson
- Department of Oncology - Division of Radiation Oncology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre and Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Stephane Thibodeau
- Department of Oncology - Division of Radiation Oncology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre and Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Martin Korzeniowski
- Department of Oncology - Division of Radiation Oncology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre and Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Fabio Ynoe Moraes
- Department of Oncology - Division of Radiation Oncology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre and Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Stefanovic M, Calvet G, Pérez-Montero H, Esteve A, Bujalance MV, Navarro-Martín A, Fernández MDA, González FF, Borras SM, Borbalas AL, Fernandez MN, Garau MM, Calduch AL, Edo FG. Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of cancer patients with oligometastatic disease: a real world study. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:199-206. [PMID: 36068449 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-02923-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a treatment modality with curative intent for oligometastatic cancer patients, commonly defined by a low-burden metastatic disease with 1-5 systemic metastases. Better knowledge of the clinical profile and prognostic factors in oligometastatic cancer patients could help to improve the selection of candidates who may obtain most benefits from SBRT. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical data and outcome in term of overall survival (OS) of patients with oligometastatic disease treated with SBRT over a 6-year period. METHODS From 2013 to 2018, 284 solid tumor cancer patients with 1-5 oligometastases underwent SBRT at a large university-affiliated oncological center in Barcelona, Spain. Variables related to the patient profile, tumor, oligometastatic disease, and treatment were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 327 metastatic tumors were treated with SBRT. In 65.5% of cases, metachronous tumors were diagnosed at least 1 year after diagnosis of the primary tumor. The median age of the patients was 73.9 years and 66.5% were males. The median follow-up was 37.5 months. The most common primary tumors were lung and colorectal cancer, with lung and bone as the most commonly treated metastatic sites. Ninety-three percent of patients showed a Karnofsky score (KPS) between 80 and 100. Adenocarcinoma was the most common histological type. The median overall survival was 53.4 months, with 1-, 2- and 5-year survival rates of 90.5%, 73.9% and 43.4%, respectively. Overall survival rates of breast (67.6 months, 95% CI 56.4-78.9), urological (63.3 months, 95% CI 55.8-70.8), and colorectal (50.8 months, 95% CI 44.2-57.4) tumors were higher as compared with other malignancies (20 months, 95% CI 11.2-28.8 months) (p < 0.001). Patients with Karnofsky score (KPS) of 90 and 100 showed a significantly better survival than those with impaired performance status (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION SBRT appears to be well tolerated and safe approach in oligometastatic patients. Patients with good performance status and with primary breast, urological and colorectal cancer have higher OS compared with other malignancies. More studies are necessary to evaluate the prognostic factors in oligometastatic disease (OMD) in order to select patients who could benefit more from this therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milica Stefanovic
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain. .,Radiobiology and Cancer Group, ONCOBELL Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Gemma Calvet
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Héctor Pérez-Montero
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Radiobiology and Cancer Group, ONCOBELL Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Esteve
- Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B·ARGO), Oncology Data Analytics Program (ODAP), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO Badalona), Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Carretera de Canyet s/n, Badalona, 08916, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Montse Ventura Bujalance
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Radiobiology and Cancer Group, ONCOBELL Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Arturo Navarro-Martín
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Radiobiology and Cancer Group, ONCOBELL Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona, Bellvitge Campus, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Dolores Arnaiz Fernández
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ferran Ferrer González
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Radiobiology and Cancer Group, ONCOBELL Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona, Bellvitge Campus, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Susanna Marin Borras
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona, Bellvitge Campus, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alicia Lozano Borbalas
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miriam Nuñez Fernandez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Radiobiology and Cancer Group, ONCOBELL Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miquel Macia Garau
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Radiobiology and Cancer Group, ONCOBELL Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona, Bellvitge Campus, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Lucas Calduch
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Radiobiology and Cancer Group, ONCOBELL Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ferran Guedea Edo
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Radiobiology and Cancer Group, ONCOBELL Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona, Bellvitge Campus, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08098, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kroese TE, Takahashi Y, Lordick F, van Rossum PSN, Ruurda JP, Lagarde SM, van Hillegersberg R, Verhoeven RHA, van Laarhoven HWM. Liver oligometastatic disease in synchronous metastatic gastric cancer patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Eur J Cancer 2023; 179:65-75. [PMID: 36509000 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This population-based cohort study analysed treatment, overall survival (OS), and independent prognostic factors for OS in gastric cancer patients with liver metastases. METHODS Between 2015 and 2017, patients with synchronous metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma limited to the liver were included from the prospectively maintained population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. Liver oligometastatic disease (OMD) was defined as ≤3 liver metastases. The primary outcome was OS. Independent prognostic factors for OS were analysed using multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS A total 295 patients with metastases limited to the liver were included. The primary tumour was resected in four patients (1.4%). Treatment for liver metastases consisted of chemotherapy alone (28.1%), trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (4.7%), surgery (1.0%), or best supportive care (67.5%). Median OS across all included patients was 4.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.1-4.5). Liver OMD was detected in 77 patients (26%). Treatment for liver OMD consisted of chemotherapy alone (24.6%), trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (5.2%), surgery (3.9%), or best supportive care (67.5%). Median OS among patients with liver OMD was 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.8-7.5). Across all patients, better OS was independently associated with liver OMD (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50-0.87), trastuzumab (HR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.23-0.72) but not with triplet compared with doublet chemotherapy (HR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.57-2.87). Worse OS was independently associated with unknown nodal stage versus cN0 (HR 1.74, 95% CI: 1.17-2.60), diffuse-type versus intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (HR 2.06, 95% CI: 1.32-3.20), and monotherapy or best supportive care versus doublet chemotherapy (HR 1.72, 95% CI: 1.03-2.87, and HR 3.61, 95% CI: 2.55-5.10, respectively). CONCLUSION In this population-based cohort study, liver OMD was detected in 26% of patients. Liver OMD and trastuzumab treatment were independently associated with better OS while triplet as compared with doublet chemotherapy was not. OS among patients with liver OMD nevertheless remained poor. The concept of OMD and the benefit of resection of liver OMD may still have been relatively unknown in this disease type during the study inclusion years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiuri E Kroese
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich University, Zurich, Switzerland. https://twitter.com/KroeseTE
| | - Yuko Takahashi
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Florian Lordick
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Peter S N van Rossum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ramos-Prudencio R, Lozano-Ruiz F, Rodríguez-Laguna A, Poitevin-Chacón MA. Current uses and applications of stereotactic body radiation therapy. GAC MED MEX 2023; 159:262-269. [PMID: 37494714 DOI: 10.24875/gmm.m23000777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a modality that delivers high doses of radiation to a well-defined tumor target in a single or a few fractions and with high precision, which significantly reduces the dose received by surrounding normal tissues. SBRT is indicated for inoperable, early stage (T1 and T2) primary non-small cell lung cancer, lung metastases with a controlled primary tumor, prostate tumors and oligometastatic disease. Despite the lack of long-term or phase III studies, efficacy results in local control are higher than 90%, with similar toxicity to that reported with conventional fractionated radiotherapy. This article describes SBRT technology and technique, along with clinical applications, indications and limitations of this therapeutic modality.
Collapse
|
42
|
Deodato F, Pezzulla D, Cilla S, Ferro M, Giannini R, Romano C, Boccardi M, Buwenge M, Valentini V, Morganti AG, Macchia G. Volumetric Intensity-Modulated Arc Stereotactic Radiosurgery Boost in Oligometastatic Patients with Spine Metastases: a Dose-escalation Study. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:e30-e39. [PMID: 36207236 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.09.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To report the final results of a dose-escalation study of volumetric intensity-modulated arc stereotactic radiosurgery (VMAT-SRS) boost after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in patients with spine metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS Oligometastatic cancer patients bearing up to five synchronous metastases (visceral or bone, including vertebral ones) and candidates for surgery or radiosurgery were considered for inclusion. 25 Gy was delivered in 10 daily fractions (2 weeks) to the metastatic lesion, affected vertebrae and adjacent ones (one cranial and one caudal vertebra). Sequentially, the dose to spinal metastases was progressively increased (8 Gy, 10 Gy, 12 Gy) in the patient cohorts. Dose-limiting toxicities were defined as any treatment-related non-hematologic acute adverse effects rated as grade ≥3 or any acute haematological toxicity rated as ≥ 4 by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale. RESULTS Fifty-two lesions accounting for 40 consecutive patients (male/female: 29/11; median age: 71 years; range 40-85) were treated from April 2011 to September 2020. Most patients had a primary prostate (65.0%) or breast cancer (22.5%). Thirty-two patients received 8 Gy VMAT-SRS boost (total BED α/β10: 45.6 Gy), 14 patients received 10 Gy (total BED α/β10: 51.2 Gy) and six patients received 12 Gy (total BED α/β10: 57.6 Gy). The median follow-up time was over 70 months (range 2-240 months). No acute toxicities > grade 2 and no late toxicities > grade 1 were recorded. The overall response rate based on computed tomography/positron emission tomography-computed tomography/magnetic resonance was 78.8%. The 24-month actuarial local control, distant metastases-free survival and overall survival rates were 88.5%, 27.1% and 90.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION A 12 Gy spine metastasis SRS boost following 25 Gy to the affected and adjacent vertebrae was feasible with an excellent local control rate and toxicity profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy; Radiology Institute, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - D Pezzulla
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - S Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - M Ferro
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - R Giannini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy.
| | - C Romano
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - M Boccardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - M Buwenge
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - V Valentini
- Radiology Institute, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy.
| | - A G Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - G Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Glemarec G, Lacaze JL, Cabarrou B, Aziza R, Jouve E, Zerdoud S, De Maio E, Massabeau C, Loo M, Esteyrie V, Ung M, Dalenc F, Izar F, Chira C. Systemic treatment with or without ablative therapies in oligometastatic breast cancer: A single institution analysis of patient outcomes. Breast 2023; 67:102-9. [PMID: 36709639 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.12.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Local ablative treatment (LAT) is increasingly combined with systemic therapy in oligometastatic breast cancer (OMBC), without a high-level evidence to support this strategy. We evaluated the addition of LAT to systemic treatment in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were local control (LC) and toxicity. We sought to identify prognostic factors associated with longer OS and PFS. METHODS AND MATERIALS We identified consecutive patients treated between 2014 and 2018 for synchronous or metachronous OMBC (defined as ≤ 5 metastases). LAT included stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), surgery, cryotherapy and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRA). PFS and OS were calculated, and Cox regression models analyzed for potential predictors of survival. RESULTS One hundred two patients were included (no-LAT, n = 62; LAT, n = 40). Sixty-four metastases received LAT. Median follow-up was 50.4 months (95% CI [44.4; 53.4]). One patient experienced grade 3 toxicity in the LAT group. Five-year PFS and OS were 34.75% (95% CI [24.42-45.26]) and 63.21% (95% CI [50.69-73.37]) respectively. Patients receiving both LAT and systemic therapy had longer PFS and OS than those with no-LAT ([HR 0.39, p = 0.002]) and ([HR 0.31, p = 0.01]). The use of LAT, HER2-positive status and hormone-receptor positivity were associated with longer PFS and OS whereas liver metastases led to worse PFS. CONCLUSIONS LAT was associated with improved outcomes in OMBC when added to systemic treatment, without significantly increasing toxicity. The prognostic factors identified to extend PFS and OS may help guide clinicians in selecting patients for LAT.
Collapse
|
44
|
Zilli T, Achard V, Dal Pra A, Schmidt-Hegemann N, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Lancia A, Ingrosso G, Alongi F, Aluwini S, Arcangeli S, Blanchard P, Conde Moreno A, Couñago F, Créhange G, Dirix P, Gomez Iturriaga A, Guckenberger M, Pasquier D, Sargos P, Scorsetti M, Supiot S, Tree AC, Zapatero A, Le Guevelou J, Ost P, Belka C. Recommendations for radiation therapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer: An ESTRO-ACROP Delphi consensus. Radiother Oncol 2022; 176:199-207. [PMID: 36228761 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Oligometastatic prostate cancer is a new and emerging treatment field with only few prospective randomized studies published so far. Despite the lack of strong level I evidence, metastasis-directed therapies (MDT) are widely used in clinical practice, mainly based on retrospective and small phase 2 studies and with a large difference across centers. Pending results of ongoing prospective randomized trials, there is a clear need for more consistent treatment indications and radiotherapy practices. MATERIAL AND METHODS A European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) Guidelines Committee consisting of radiation oncologists' experts in prostate cancer was asked to answer a dedicated questionnaire, including 41 questions on the main controversial issues with regard to oligometastatic prostate cancer. RESULTS The panel achieved consensus on patient selection and routine use of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) imaging as preferred staging and restaging imaging. MDT strategies are recommended in the de novo oligometastatic, oligorecurrent and oligoprogressive disease setting for nodal, bone and visceral metastases. Radiation therapy doses, volumes and techniques were discussed and commented. CONCLUSION These recommendations have the purpose of providing standardization and consensus to optimize the radiotherapy treatment of oligometastatic prostate cancer until mature results of randomized trials are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Vérane Achard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alan Dal Pra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | | | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Lancia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Policlinico San Matteo Pavia Fondazione IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy; University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Stefano Arcangeli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France; Inserm U1018 Oncostat, Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Antonio Conde Moreno
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, CEU Cardenal Herrera University, Castellón, Spain
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, Madrid, Spain; Medicine Department, School of Biomedical Sciences, Universidad Europea, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Alfonso Gomez Iturriaga
- Biocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Basque Country University (UPV/EHU), Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Lille University, Lille, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Alison C Tree
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Health Research Institute, University Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jennifer Le Guevelou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, GZA ziekenhuizen, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Pickett L, Dunne M, Monaghan O, Grogan L, Breathnach O, Walsh TN. Oesophageal cancer metastases: An observational study of a more aggressive approach. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14:997-1007. [PMID: 36185560 PMCID: PMC9521477 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i9.997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis for oesophageal carcinoma is poor, but once distant metastases emerge the prognosis is considered hopeless. There is no consistent protocol for the early identification and aggressive management of metastases.
AIM To examine the outcome of a policy of active postoperative surveillance with aggressive treatment of confirmed metastases.
METHODS A prospectively maintained database of 205 patients diagnosed with oesophageal carcinoma between 1998 and 2019 and treated with curative intent was interrogated for patients with metastases, either at diagnosis or on follow-up surveillance and treated for cure. This cohort was compared with incomplete clinical responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) who subsequently underwent surgery on their primary tumour. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare survival differences between groups.
RESULTS Of 205 patients, 11 (5.4%) had metastases treated for cure (82% male; median age 60 years; 9 adenocarcinoma and 2 squamous cell carcinomas). All had undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, followed by surgery in all but 1 case. Of the 11 patients, 4 had metastatic disease at diagnosis, of whom 3 were successfully downstaged with nCRT before definitive surgery; 2 of these 4 also developed oligometastatic recurrence and were treated with curative intent. Following definitive treatment, 7 had treatment for metachronous oligometastatic disease; 5 of whom underwent metastasectomy (adrenal × 2; lung × 2; liver × 1). The median overall survival was 10.9 years [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7-21.0 years], which was statistically significantly longer than incomplete clinical responders undergoing surgery on the primary tumour without metastatic intervention [n = 62; median overall survival = 1.9 (95%CI: 1.1-2.7; P = 0.012]. The cumulative proportion surviving 1, 3, and 5 years was 100%, 91%, and 61%, respectively compared to 71%, 36%, and 25% for incomplete clinical responders undergoing surgery on the primary tumour who did not undergo treatment for metastatic disease.
CONCLUSION Metastatic oesophageal cancer represents a unique challenge, but aggressive treatment can be rewarded with impressive survival data. In view of recent advances in targeted therapies, intensive follow-up may yield a greater number of patients with curative potential and thus improved long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne Pickett
- Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin D15 X40D, Ireland
| | - Mary Dunne
- Clinical Trials Resource Unit, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin D06 HH36, Ireland
| | - Orla Monaghan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin D06 HH36, Ireland
| | - Liam Grogan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin D09 V2N0, Ireland
| | - Oscar Breathnach
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin D09 V2N0, Ireland
| | - Thomas N Walsh
- Department of Surgery, RCSI Bahrain, Adliya 15503, Bahrain
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Motaghi M, England RW, Nejad NH, Sankaran N, Patel AM, Khan MA. Assessing long-term locoregional control of spinal osseous metastases after microwave ablation. J Clin Neurosci 2022; 104:48-55. [PMID: 35963064 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Osseous metastases to the spine result in significant pain and decreased quality of life. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of spinal metastases regarding pain reduction and local control of disease progression. In this single center retrospective study, patients with osseous metastases to the spine undergoing MWA with vertebroplasty from 2013 to 2020 were included. Locoregional control of metabolic activity at the treated level was assessed using PET/CT scan both pre- and post-procedure. Pain reduction was measured using change in visual analog scale (VAS) pain score. Forty-eight spinal levels were treated with MWA in 28 patients (57 % male, mean age 68 ± 9 years). Median ablation time, energy, and temperature were 4 min and 13 s, 3.6 kJ, and 80 °C, respectively. Median pre-procedure maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was significantly reduced following ablation, from 4.55 (IQR 3.65-6.1) to 0 (IQR 0-1.8; p < 0.001), over an average of 29 ± 14.1 month follow up period. Pre-procedure VAS pain score was reduced from median (IQR) of 8 (6.5-9) to 1(1-2), 2(1-3) and 1(0.5-3) at 24 h, four weeks, and six months post-procedure, respectively (all p < 0.001 with respect to pre-procedure scores). In conclusion, this study supports microwave ablation as an effective technique for pain palliation and long-term locoregional tumor control of oligometastatic spinal disease as assessed by metabolic response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Motaghi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Brookdale University Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11212, USA
| | - Ryan W England
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Nima Hafezi Nejad
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Nisha Sankaran
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Akash M Patel
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, The University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
| | - Majid A Khan
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Radiology. Division of Neuroradiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Mao Y, Hu M, Yang G, Gao E, Xu W. Cytoreductive prostatectomy improves survival outcomes in patients with oligometastases: a systematic meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2022; 20:255. [PMID: 35945562 PMCID: PMC9361652 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02715-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whether cytoreductive prostatectomy (CRP) should be performed in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (OPC) remains controversial. The goal of this systematic meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of CRP as a treatment for OPC. METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. Data sources included publications in the PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, EBSCO, and Web of Science (SCI) databases as of May 2022. Eligible articles included prospective studies comparing the efficacy of CRP to a lack of CRP in patients with OPC. RESULTS In total, 10 publications incorporating 888 patients were analyzed. Tumor-reducing prostatectomy was found to have no significant effect on long-term or short-term OS [OR = 2.26, 95% CI (0.97, 5.28), P = 0.06] and [OR = 1.73, 95% CI (0.83, 3.58), P = 0.14], but it significantly improved patient long-term or short-term CSS [OR = 1.77, 95% CI (1.01, 310), P = 0.04] and [OR = 2.71, 95% CI (1.72, 4.29), P < 0.0001] and PFS [OR = 1.93, 95% CI (1.25, 2.97), P = 0.003]. CONCLUSION These results suggest that cytoreductive prostatectomy can confer survival benefits to OPC patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION INPLASY protocol 202260017 https://doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2022.6.0017 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifeng Mao
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, China.,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Research, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, 233030, Anhui, China
| | - Mingqiu Hu
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, China. .,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Research, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, 233030, Anhui, China. .,Department of Urology, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, 525000, Guangdong, China.
| | - Gaowei Yang
- Department of Urology, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, 525000, Guangdong, China
| | - Erke Gao
- Department of Urology, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, 525000, Guangdong, China
| | - Wangwang Xu
- Department of Urology, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, 525000, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Wong RK, Liu ZA, Barry A, Rogalla P, Bezjak A, Brierley JD, Dawson LA, Giuliani M, Kim J, Ringash J, Sun A, Chung P, Hope A, Shessel A, Lindsay P. Patient Reported and Clinical Outcomes from 5 Fraction SBRT for Oligometastases - a Prospective Single Institution Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:1000-1010. [PMID: 35901981 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the long-term outcomes of a five-fraction normal tissue tolerance adapted strategy for the management of oligometastases (OM). METHODS & MATERIALS Patients with histologically confirmed solid tumors, ≤5 extra-cranial metastases, suitable for a definitive approach for all metastatic lesions, at least one lesion suitable for SBRT, ECOG ≤2 were eligible. Treatment intervention was a 5-fraction (25- 55Gy) normal tissue adapted dosing strategy. The primary outcome was cumulative local progression rate at 12 months. RESULTS Between Mar 2013- Jan 2018, 137 patients started SBRT. Median FU was 35.7 months. 107 (78%) patients had a solitary OM. The mean PTV D95 was 39.6 [SD 8.8]; BED10 70.8) Gy. Mean PTV D95 was highest for lung lesions [48.7 (SD4.7); BED10 96.1] Gy, but was <40Gy for all other anatomical sites. Two Grade 3 toxicities (GI bleed) were observed with stomach D0.05 30.3Gy and 30.4Gy. The cumulative local progression rate at 12/36 months was 16.1 (95% CI 10-22)% and 38.3 (95% CI 30-46.7) %; OS was 90% and 37%, and PFS was 58% and 19% respectively. Mean Symptom burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Total Score) worsened in patients with progressive disease (+8.8) at 12 months and was paralleled by changes in mean EORTC QLQ30 Summary Score and Global Health Quality of Life Score. Systemic therapy was initiated in 55% of patients at an average of 12.7 (SD12.4) months. CONCLUSIONS If long term PFS is the primary goal of therapy, SBRT for OM achieved this in less than 20% of patients attributable to a high risk of distant failure. Favorable local progression free survival is accompanied by preservation of QoL, avoidance of symptom progression and reduced need of antineoplastic therapies at 12 months. Information on symptom burden, QoL, as well as pattern of antineoplastic therapy use following progressive disease is useful to support conversations between patients, families and health care providers. Strategies to improve patient selection and reduce distant progression rate remain a priority for further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Ks Wong
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto. Toronto. Ontario. Canada..
| | - Zhihui Amy Liu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto. Toronto. Ontario. Canada
| | - Aisling Barry
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto. Toronto. Ontario. Canada
| | - Patrik Rogalla
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto. Toronto. Ontario. Canada
| | - Andrea Bezjak
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto. Toronto. Ontario. Canada
| | - James D Brierley
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto. Toronto. Ontario. Canada
| | - Laura A Dawson
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto. Toronto. Ontario. Canada
| | - Meredith Giuliani
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto. Toronto. Ontario. Canada
| | - John Kim
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto. Toronto. Ontario. Canada
| | - Jolie Ringash
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto. Toronto. Ontario. Canada
| | - Alexander Sun
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto. Toronto. Ontario. Canada
| | - Peter Chung
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto. Toronto. Ontario. Canada
| | - Andrew Hope
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto. Toronto. Ontario. Canada
| | - Andrea Shessel
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network; Toronto. Ontario. Canada
| | - Patricia Lindsay
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto. Toronto. Ontario. Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Sanuki N, Takeda A, Tsurugai Y, Eriguchi T. Role of stereotactic body radiotherapy in multidisciplinary management of liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer. Jpn J Radiol 2022; 40:1009-1016. [PMID: 35857212 PMCID: PMC9529716 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-022-01307-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
In the treatment of colorectal cancer patients with distant metastases, the development of new anticancer agents has considerably prolonged progression-free survival. Such survival benefits attributed to chemotherapy have increased the relative significance of local therapy in patients with limited metastases. The liver is recognized as the most common site of metastasis of colorectal cancer because of the intestinal mesenteric drainage to the portal veins. Hepatic resection of isolated liver metastases of colorectal cancer is the only option for a potential cure. However, hepatic metastases are resectable in only approximately 20% of the patients. For remaining patients with high-risk resectable liver metastases or those who are unfit for surgery, less invasive, local therapies including radiation therapy (stereotactic body radiation therapy, SBRT) may have a potential role in treatment. Although the local control rate of SBRT for colorectal liver metastases has room for improvement, its less-invasive nature and broad indications deserve consideration. Future research should include SBRT dose escalation or the selection of patients who benefit from local ablative therapies. SBRT may offer an alternative, non-invasive approach for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases in a multidisciplinary treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoko Sanuki
- Department of Radiology, Yokkaichi Municipal Hospital, 2-2-37, Shibata, Yokkaichi, Mie, 510-8567, Japan.
- Radiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, 6-2-24, Ofuna, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-0056, Japan.
| | - Atsuya Takeda
- Radiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, 6-2-24, Ofuna, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-0056, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Tsurugai
- Radiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, 6-2-24, Ofuna, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-0056, Japan
| | - Takahisa Eriguchi
- Radiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, 6-2-24, Ofuna, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-0056, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Deodato F, Pezzulla D, Cilla S, Ferro M, Romano C, Bonome P, Buwenge M, Zamagni A, Strigari L, Valentini V, Morganti AG, Macchia G. Stereotactic radiosurgery for bone metastases in oligometastatic prostate cancer patients: DESTROY-2 clinical trial subanalysis. Clin Transl Oncol 2022; 24:1177-1183. [PMID: 34984604 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02764-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Aim of this analysis was to report toxicity and clinical outcomes in oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for bone metastases. METHODS We separately analyzed clinical data of PCa patients with bone oligometastases enrolled in a prospective phase I trial (DESTROY-2). DESTROY-2 was based on SRS delivered using volumetric modulated arc therapy in patients with primary or metastatic tumors in several extra-cranial body sites. Acute and late toxicity, biochemical tumor response, local control (LC), distant metastases-free (DPFS), progression-free (PFS), time to next-line systemic treatment-free (NEST-FS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated. RESULTS Data on 37 PCa patients, carrying out 50 bone metastases, candidates for curative-intent treatment and treated with SRS at our Institution were collected. SRS dose ranged between 12 and 24 Gy. One grade 1 acute skin toxicity in one patient treated on the hip (24 Gy) and one grade 1 late skin toxicity in a patient with a scapular lesion (24 Gy) were recorded. No cases of bone fracture were registered in the treated population. With a median follow-up of 25 months (range 3-72 months) 2-year actuarial LC, DPFS, PFS, and OS were 96.7%, 58.1%, 58.1%, and 95.8%, respectively. Median and 2-year NEST-FS were 30 months (range 1-69 months) and 51.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Data analysis showed few toxicity events, high local control rate and prolonged NEST-FS after linear accelerator-based radiosurgery of bone oligometastases from PCa. The possibility of postponing systemic treatments in patients with oligometastatic PCa by means of SRS should be taken into account. Further prospective studies on larger series are needed to confirm the reported results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise S.P.A. Hospital, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 1, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.,Radiology Institute, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00135, Rome, Italy
| | - D Pezzulla
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise S.P.A. Hospital, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 1, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - S Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - M Ferro
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise S.P.A. Hospital, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 1, 86100, Campobasso, Italy
| | - C Romano
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - P Bonome
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise S.P.A. Hospital, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 1, 86100, Campobasso, Italy
| | - M Buwenge
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - A Zamagni
- Radiotherapy Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Giuseppe Massarenti, Bologna, Italy
| | - L Strigari
- Medical Physics Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - V Valentini
- Radiology Institute, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00135, Rome, Italy.,Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - A G Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - G Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise S.P.A. Hospital, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 1, 86100, Campobasso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|