1
|
Zafra J, Onieva JL, Oliver J, Garrido-Barros M, González-Hernández A, Martínez-Gálvez B, Román A, Ordóñez-Marmolejo R, Pérez-Ruiz E, Benítez JC, Mesas A, Vera A, Chicas-Sett R, Rueda-Domínguez A, Barragán I. Novel Blood Biomarkers for Response Prediction and Monitoring of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy in Metastatic Oligoprogressive Lung Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:4533. [PMID: 38674117 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25084533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Up to 80% of patients under immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) face resistance. In this context, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) can induce an immune or abscopal response. However, its molecular determinants remain unknown. We present early results of a translational study assessing biomarkers of response to combined ICI and SABR (I-SABR) in liquid biopsy from oligoprogressive patients in a prospective observational multicenter study. Cohort A includes metastatic patients in oligoprogression to ICI maintaining the same ICI due to clinical benefit and who receive concomitant SABR. B is a comparative group of oligometastatic patients receiving only SABR. Blood samples are extracted at baseline (T1), after the first (T2) and last (T3) fraction, two months post-SABR (T4) and at further progression (TP). Response is evaluated by iRECIST and defined by the objective response rate (ORR)-complete and partial responses. We assess peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and small RNA from extracellular vesicles. Twenty-seven patients could be analyzed (cohort A: n = 19; B: n = 8). Most were males with non-small cell lung cancer and one progressing lesion. With a median follow-up of 6 months, the last ORR was 63% (26% complete and 37% partial response). A decrease in cfDNA from T2 to T3 correlated with a good response. At T2, CD8+PD1+ and CD8+PDL1+ cells were increased in non-responders and responders, respectively. At T2, 27 microRNAs were differentially expressed. These are potential biomarkers of response to I-SABR in oligoprogressive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Zafra
- Group of Translational Research in Cancer Immunotherapy (CIMO2), Department of Radiation Oncology, Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital, Institute of Biomedical Research in Malaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaga (UMA), 29071 Málaga, Spain
| | - Juan Luis Onieva
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaga (UMA), 29071 Málaga, Spain
- Group of Translational Research in Cancer Immunotherapy (CIMO2), Medical Oncology Intercenter Unit, Regional and Virgen de la Victoria Hospitals, Institute of Biomedical Research in Malaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain
| | - Javier Oliver
- Group of Translational Research in Cancer Immunotherapy (CIMO2), Medical Oncology Intercenter Unit, Regional and Virgen de la Victoria Hospitals, Institute of Biomedical Research in Malaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain
| | - María Garrido-Barros
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaga (UMA), 29071 Málaga, Spain
- Group of Translational Research in Cancer Immunotherapy (CIMO2), Medical Oncology Intercenter Unit, Regional and Virgen de la Victoria Hospitals, Institute of Biomedical Research in Malaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain
| | - Andrea González-Hernández
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaga (UMA), 29071 Málaga, Spain
- Group of Translational Research in Cancer Immunotherapy (CIMO2), Medical Oncology Intercenter Unit, Regional and Virgen de la Victoria Hospitals, Institute of Biomedical Research in Malaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain
| | - Beatriz Martínez-Gálvez
- Group of Translational Research in Cancer Immunotherapy (CIMO2), Medical Oncology Intercenter Unit, Regional and Virgen de la Victoria Hospitals, Institute of Biomedical Research in Malaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain
| | - Alicia Román
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital, Institute of Biomedical Research in Malaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain
| | - Rafael Ordóñez-Marmolejo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital, Institute of Biomedical Research in Malaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain
| | - Elisabeth Pérez-Ruiz
- Group of Translational Research in Cancer Immunotherapy (CIMO2), Medical Oncology Intercenter Unit, Regional and Virgen de la Victoria Hospitals, Institute of Biomedical Research in Malaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain
| | - José Carlos Benítez
- Group of Translational Research in Cancer Immunotherapy (CIMO2), Medical Oncology Intercenter Unit, Regional and Virgen de la Victoria Hospitals, Institute of Biomedical Research in Malaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain
| | - Andrés Mesas
- Medical Oncology Intercenter Unit, Regional and Virgen de la Victoria Hospitals, 29010 Málaga, Spain
| | - Andrés Vera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr Negrín University Hospital, 35010 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Rodolfo Chicas-Sett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, La Fe University Hospital, 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Group of Clinical and Translational Cancer Research, Le Fe Health Research Institute, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| | - Antonio Rueda-Domínguez
- Group of Translational Research in Cancer Immunotherapy (CIMO2), Medical Oncology Intercenter Unit, Regional and Virgen de la Victoria Hospitals, Institute of Biomedical Research in Malaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain
| | - Isabel Barragán
- Group of Translational Research in Cancer Immunotherapy (CIMO2), Medical Oncology Intercenter Unit, Regional and Virgen de la Victoria Hospitals, Institute of Biomedical Research in Malaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain
- Group of Pharmacoepigenetics, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cruz-Lim EM, Mou B, Baker S, Arbour G, Stefanyk K, Jiang W, Liu M, Bergman A, Schellenberg D, Alexander A, Berrang T, Bang A, Chng N, Matthews Q, Carolan H, Hsu F, Miller S, Atrchian S, Chan E, Ho C, Mohamed I, Lin A, Huang V, Mestrovic A, Hyde D, Lund C, Pai H, Valev B, Lefresne S, Tyldesley S, Olson R. Prospective Longitudinal Assessment of Quality of Life After Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Oligometastases: Analysis of the Population-based SABR-5 Phase II Trial. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:148-156. [PMID: 38087705 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.11.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate longitudinal patient-reported quality of life (QoL) in patients treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS The SABR-5 trial was a population-based single-arm phase II study of SABR to up to five sites of oligometastases, conducted in six regional cancer centres in British Columbia, Canada from 2016 to 2020. Prospective QoL was measured using treatment site-specific QoL questionnaires at pre-treatment baseline and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30 and 36 months after treatment. Patients with bone metastases were assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Patients with liver, adrenal and abdominopelvic lymph node metastases were assessed with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Abdominal Discomfort (FACIT-AD). Patients with lung and intrathoracic lymph node metastases were assessed with the Prospective Outcomes and Support Initiative (POSI) lung questionnaire. The two one-sided test procedure was used to assess equivalence between the worst QoL score and the baseline score of individual patients. The mean QoL at all time points was used to determine the trajectory of QoL response after SABR. The proportion of patients with 'stable', 'improved' or 'worsened' QoL was determined for all time points based on standard minimal clinically important differences (MCID; BPI worst pain = 2, BPI functional interference score [FIS] = 0.5, FACIT-AD Trial Outcome Index [TOI] = 8, POSI = 3). RESULTS All enrolled patients with baseline QoL assessment and at least one follow-up assessment were analysed (n = 133). On equivalence testing, the patients' worst QoL scores were clinically different from baseline scores and met MCID (BPI worst pain mean difference: 1.8, 90% confidence interval 1.19 to 2.42]; BPI FIS mean difference: 1.68, 90% confidence interval 1.15 to 2.21; FACIT-AD TOI mean difference: -8.76, 90% confidence interval -11.29 to -6.24; POSI mean difference: -4.61, 90% confidence interval -6.09 to -3.14). However, the mean FIS transiently worsened at 9, 18 and 21 months but eventually returned to stable levels. The mean FACIT and POSI scores also worsened at 36 months, albeit with a limited number of responses (n = 4 and 8, respectively). Most patients reported stable QoL at all time points (range: BPI worst pain 71-82%, BPI FIS 45-78%, FACIT-AD TOI 50-100%, POSI 25-73%). Clinically significant stability, worsening and improvement were seen in 70%/13%/18% of patients at 3 months, 53%/28%/19% at 18 months and 63%/25%/13% at 36 months. CONCLUSIONS Transient decreases in QoL that met MCID were seen between patients' worst QoL scores and baseline scores. However, most patients experienced stable QoL relative to pre-treatment levels on long-term follow-up. Further studies are needed to characterise patients at greatest risk for decreased QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M Cruz-Lim
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - B Mou
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Baker
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Surrey, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - G Arbour
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - K Stefanyk
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - W Jiang
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Surrey, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - M Liu
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Bergman
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - D Schellenberg
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Surrey, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Alexander
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - T Berrang
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Bang
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - N Chng
- BC Cancer - Prince George, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Q Matthews
- BC Cancer - Prince George, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - H Carolan
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - F Hsu
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Abbotsford, Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Miller
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Prince George, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Atrchian
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - E Chan
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - C Ho
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Surrey, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - I Mohamed
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Lin
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - V Huang
- BC Cancer - Surrey, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Mestrovic
- BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - D Hyde
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - C Lund
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Surrey, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - H Pai
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - B Valev
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Lefresne
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Tyldesley
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - R Olson
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Prince George, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cruz-Lim EM, Mou B, Jiang W, Liu M, Bergman A, Schellenberg D, Alexander A, Berrang T, Bang A, Chng N, Matthews Q, Carolan H, Hsu F, Miller S, Atrchian S, Chan E, Ho C, Mohamed I, Lin A, Huang V, Mestrovic A, Hyde D, Lund C, Pai H, Valev B, Lefresne S, Tyldesley S, Olson R, Baker S. Predictors of Quality of Life Decline in Patients with Oligometastases treated with Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy: Analysis of the Population-Based SABR-5 Phase II Trial. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:141-147. [PMID: 38296662 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Most patients experience stable quality of life (QoL) after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) treatment for oligometastases. However, a subset of patients experience clinically relevant declines in QoL on post-treatment follow-up. This study aimed to identify risk factors for QoL decline. MATERIALS AND METHODS The SABR-5 trial was a population-based single-arm phase II study of SABR to up to five sites of oligometastases. Prospective QoL was measured using treatment site-specific tools at pre-treatment baseline and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30 and 36 months after treatment. The time to persistent QoL decline was calculated as the time from SABR to the first decline in QoL score meeting minimum clinically important difference with no improvement to baseline score on subsequent assessments. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were carried out to determine factors associated with QoL decline. RESULTS One hundred and thirty-three patients were included with a median follow-up of 32 months (interquartile range 25-43). Thirty-five patients (26%) experienced a persistent decline in QoL. The median time until persistent QoL decline was not reached. The cumulative incidence of QoL decline at 2 and 3 years were 22% (95% confidence interval 14.0-29.6) and 40% (95% confidence interval 28.0-51.2), respectively. In multivariable analysis, disease progression (odds ratio 5.23, 95% confidence interval 1.59-17.47, P = 0.007) and adrenal metastases (odds ratio 9.70, 95% confidence interval 1.41-66.93, P = 0.021) were associated with a higher risk of QoL decline. Grade 3 or higher (odds ratio 3.88, 95% confidence interval 0.92-16.31, P = 0.064) and grade 2 or higher SABR-associated toxicity (odds ratio 2.24, 95% confidence interval 0.85-5.91, P = 0.10) were associated with an increased risk of QoL decline but did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS Disease progression and adrenal lesion site were associated with persistent QoL decline following SABR. The development of grade 3 or higher toxicities was also associated with an increased risk, albeit not statistically significant. Further studies are needed, focusing on the QoL impact of metastasis-directed therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M Cruz-Lim
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - B Mou
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - W Jiang
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - M Liu
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Bergman
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - D Schellenberg
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Alexander
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - T Berrang
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Bang
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - N Chng
- BC Cancer - Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Q Matthews
- BC Cancer - Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - H Carolan
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - F Hsu
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Miller
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Atrchian
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - E Chan
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - C Ho
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - I Mohamed
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Lin
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - V Huang
- BC Cancer - Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Mestrovic
- BC Cancer - Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - D Hyde
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - C Lund
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - H Pai
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - B Valev
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Lefresne
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Tyldesley
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - R Olson
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Baker
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Surrey, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gutman MJ, Serra LM, Koshy M, Katipally RR. SBRT for Liver Tumors: What the Interventional Radiologist Needs to Know. Semin Intervent Radiol 2024; 41:1-10. [PMID: 38495259 PMCID: PMC10940045 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1778657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
This review summarizes the clinical evidence supporting the utilization of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma, liver metastases, and cholangiocarcinoma. Emerging prospective evidence has demonstrated the benefit and low rates of toxicity across a broad range of clinical contexts. We provide an introduction for the interventional radiologist, with a discussion of underlying themes such as tumor dose-response, mitigation of liver toxicity, and the technical considerations relevant to performing liver SBRT. Ultimately, we recommend that SBRT should be routinely included in the armamentarium of locoregional therapies for liver malignancies, alongside those liver-directed therapies offered by interventional radiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Gutman
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Lucas M. Serra
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Matthew Koshy
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Rohan R. Katipally
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kisivan K, Farkas A, Kovacs P, Glavak C, Lukacs G, Mahr K, Szabo Z, Csima MP, Gulyban A, Toth Z, Kaposztas Z, Lakosi F. Pancreatic SABR using peritumoral fiducials, triggered imaging and breath-hold. Pathol Oncol Res 2023; 29:1611456. [PMID: 38188611 PMCID: PMC10767757 DOI: 10.3389/pore.2023.1611456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
Background: We aim to present our linear accelerator-based workflow for pancreatic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in order to address the following issues: intrafractional organ motion management, Cone Beam CT (CBCT) image quality, residual errors with dosimetric consequences, treatment time, and clinical results. Methods: Between 2016 and 2021, 14 patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with induction chemotherapy and SABR using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Internal target volume (ITV) concept (5), phase-gated (4), or breath hold (5) techniques were used. Treatment was verified by CBCT before and after irradiation, while tumor motion was monitored and controlled by kV triggered imaging and beam hold using peritumoral surgical clips. Beam interruptions and treatment time were recorded. The CBCT image quality was scored and supplemented by an agreement analysis (Krippendorff's-α) of breath-hold CBCT images to determine the position of OARs relative to the planning risk volumes (PRV). Residual errors and their dosimetry impact were also calculated. Progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier analysis with acute and late toxicity reporting (CTCAEv4). Results: On average, beams were interrupted once (range: 0-3) per treatment session on triggered imaging. The total median treatment time was 16.7 ± 10.8 min, significantly less for breath-hold vs. phase-gated sessions (18.8 ± 6.2 vs. 26.5 ± 13.4, p < 0.001). The best image quality was achieved by breath hold CBCT. The Krippendorff's-α test showed a strong agreement among five radiation therapists (mean K-α value: 0.8 (97.5%). The mean residual errors were <0.2 cm in each direction resulting in an average difference of <2% in dosimetry for OAR and target volume. Two patients received offline adaptation. The median OS/PFS after induction chemotherapy and SABR was 20/12 months and 15/8 months. No Gr. ≥2 acute/late RT-related toxicity was noted. Conclusion: Linear accelerator based pancreatic SABR with the combination of CBCT and triggered imaging + beam hold is feasible. Peritumoral fiducials improve utility while breath-hold CBCT provides the best image quality at a reasonable treatment time with offline adaptation possibilities. In well-selected cases, it can be an effective alternative in clinics where CBCT/MRI-guided online adaptive workflow is not available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katalin Kisivan
- Department of Radiotherapy, Somogy County Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital, Kaposvár, Hungary
| | - Andrea Farkas
- Department of Radiotherapy, Somogy County Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital, Kaposvár, Hungary
| | - Peter Kovacs
- Department of Radiotherapy, Somogy County Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital, Kaposvár, Hungary
| | - Csaba Glavak
- Department of Radiotherapy, Somogy County Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital, Kaposvár, Hungary
| | - Gabor Lukacs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Somogy County Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital, Kaposvár, Hungary
| | - Karoly Mahr
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zala County Szent Raphael Hospital, Zalaegerszeg, Hungary
| | - Zsolt Szabo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zala County Szent Raphael Hospital, Zalaegerszeg, Hungary
| | - Melinda Petone Csima
- Institute of Education, Hungarian University of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, Hungary
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Akos Gulyban
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
- Radiophysics and MRI Physics Laboratory, Université Libre De Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Zoltan Toth
- Medicopus Nonprofit Ltd., Somogy County Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital, Kaposvár, Hungary
- PET Center, Somogy County Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital, Kaposvár, Hungary
| | - Zsolt Kaposztas
- Department of Surgery, Somogy County Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital, Kaposvár, Hungary
| | - Ferenc Lakosi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Somogy County Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital, Kaposvár, Hungary
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Franzese C, Lucchini R, Roghi M, Badalamenti M, Baldaccini D, Comito T, Franceschini D, Navarria P, Di Cristina L, Lo Faro L, Galdieri C, Reggiori G, Mancosu P, Tomatis S, Scorsetti M. Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: The Role of Three-Dimensional Tumour Volume in Patient Survival. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:e649-e656. [PMID: 37775459 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The definition of oligometastatic prostate cancer (OPCa) is currently based solely on the maximum number of detectable metastases, as there are no validated biomarkers available. The aim of this study was to identify novel predictive factors for OPCa patients who underwent metastases-directed therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS This monocentre, retrospective study included consecutive OPCa patients with a maximum of five metastases in up to two organs, detected with choline- or PSMA-positron emission tomography, who were treated with metastases-directed stereotactic body radiation therapy. Endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival, assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression was carried out to evaluate the association between clinical factors and survival outcomes. RESULTS Between 2009 and 2021, 163 patients and 320 metastases were treated with 226 stereotactic body radiation therapy courses. The median three-dimensional metastatic tumour volume was 4.1 cm3, with a range from 0.01 to 233.4 cm3. In total, 87 (53.4%), 21 (12.9%) and 55 (33.7%) metastases were classified as cN1, cM1a and cM1b, respectively. The median follow-up was 28.5 months. The rates of overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years were 89.5% (95% confidence interval 83.4-93.4), 74.9% (95% confidence interval 66.1-81.7) and 57.2% (95% confidence interval 45.8-67.1), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that overall survival reduced with the increase in three-dimensional total tumour volume (hazard ratio 1.93, 95% confidence interval 1.06-3.52; P = 0.030) and confirmed a significant difference between cN1 versus cM1a-b disease (hazard ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 1.01-3.25; P = 0.046). The cut-off value of total volume correlated with the highest risk of death was 20 cm3 (hazard ratio 2.37, 95% confidence interval 1.34-4.18; P = 0.003). The median progression-free survival was 17.8 months, with 1-, 3- and 5-year rates of 63.7% (95% confidence interval 55.4-70.9), 31.5% (95% confidence interval 22.8-40.6) and 24.7% (95% confidence interval 16.0-34.3). CONCLUSIONS This study identified three-dimensional total tumour volume and the site of oligometastases as significant predictors of survival in OPCa patients treated with metastases-directed therapy. These parameters can potentially be used to personalised treatment and improve patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Franzese
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy.
| | - R Lucchini
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - M Roghi
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - M Badalamenti
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - D Baldaccini
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - T Comito
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - D Franceschini
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - P Navarria
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - L Di Cristina
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - L Lo Faro
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - C Galdieri
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - G Reggiori
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - P Mancosu
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - S Tomatis
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - M Scorsetti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Belaidi L, Wang P, Quintin K, Durdux C, Giroux-Leprieur E, Giraud P. Impact of Waiting Response Evaluation to First-Line Systemic Therapy before Considering Local Ablative Therapy in Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5127. [PMID: 37958302 PMCID: PMC10649273 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Revised: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is gaining increasing importance in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) management. The optimal sequence of tumor irradiation relative to systemic treatment remains unclear. If waiting response evaluation to first-line systemic therapy (FLST) before considering local treatment may allow for the exclusion of poorer prognosis progressive tumors that may not benefit from SRT, performing irradiation near immune check point inhibitor (ICI) first administration seems to improve their synergic effect. Herein, we aimed to determine whether delaying SRT after response evaluation to FLST would result in better prognosis. We compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time to first subsequent therapy (TFST) for 50 patients locally treated before or within 90 days of initiating FLST (early SRT), with 49 patients treated at least 90 days after initiating FLST (late SRT). Patients treated with conventional chemotherapy alone exhibited significantly poorer median OS, PFS, and TFST in the early SRT arm: (in months) 16.5 [8.33-NR] vs. 58.3 [35.05-NR] (p = 0.0015); 4.69 [3.57-8.98] vs. 8.20 [6.66-12.00] (p = 0.017); and 6.26 [4.82-11.8] vs. 10.0 [7.44-21.8] (p = 0.0074), respectively. Patient receiving ICI showed no difference in OS (NR [25.2-NR] vs. 36.6 [35.1-NR], p = 0.79), PFS (7.54 [6.23-NR] vs. 4.07 [2.52-NR], p = 0.19), and TFST (13.7 [9.48-NR] vs. 10.3 [3.54-NR], p = 0.49). These results suggest that delaying SRT treatment in order to filter a rapidly growing tumor may be less necessary when ICI is administered in mNSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lahcene Belaidi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou AP-HP, 20 Rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Pascal Wang
- Department of Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology Service, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, 9 Av. Charles de Gaulle, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Kevin Quintin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou AP-HP, 20 Rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Catherine Durdux
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou AP-HP, 20 Rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Etienne Giroux-Leprieur
- Department of Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology Service, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, 9 Av. Charles de Gaulle, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Philippe Giraud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou AP-HP, 20 Rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zarębska I, Harat M. An optimal dose-fractionation for stereotactic body radiotherapy in peripherally, centrally and ultracentrally located early-stage non-small lung cancer. Thorac Cancer 2023; 14:2813-2820. [PMID: 37691151 PMCID: PMC10542466 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.15071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), also known as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), is commonly used in inoperable patients with early-stage non-small lung cancer (NSCLC). This treatment has good outcomes and low toxicity in peripherally located tumors. However, in lesions which are located close to structures such as the bronchial tree or mediastinum the risk of severe toxicity increases. This review summarizes the evidence of dose-fractionation in SBRT of NSCLC patients in various locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izabela Zarębska
- Department of Neurooncology and RadiosurgeryFranciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology CenterBydgoszczPoland
- Department of RadiotherapyFranciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology CenterBydgoszczPoland
| | - Maciej Harat
- Department of Neurooncology and RadiosurgeryFranciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology CenterBydgoszczPoland
- Center of Medical SciencesUniversity of Science and TechnologyBydgoszczPoland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chang JY, Lin SH, Dong W, Liao Z, Gandhi SJ, Gay CM, Zhang J, Chun SG, Elamin YY, Fossella FV, Blumenschein G, Cascone T, Le X, Pozadzides JV, Tsao A, Verma V, Welsh JW, Chen AB, Altan M, Mehran RJ, Vaporciyan AA, Swisher SG, Balter PA, Fujimoto J, Wistuba II, Feng L, Lee JJ, Heymach JV. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy with or without immunotherapy for early-stage or isolated lung parenchymal recurrent node-negative non-small-cell lung cancer: an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet 2023; 402:871-881. [PMID: 37478883 PMCID: PMC10529504 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01384-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is the standard treatment for medically inoperable early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but regional or distant relapses, or both, are common. Immunotherapy reduces recurrence and improves survival in people with stage III NSCLC after chemoradiotherapy, but its utility in stage I and II cases is unclear. We therefore conducted a randomised phase 2 trial of SABR alone compared with SABR with immunotherapy (I-SABR) for people with early-stage NSCLC. METHODS We did an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial comparing SABR to I-SABR, conducted at three different hospitals in TX, USA. People aged 18 years or older with histologically proven treatment-naive stage IA-IB (tumour size ≤4 cm, N0M0), stage IIA (tumour size ≤5 cm, N0M0), or stage IIB (tumour size >5 cm and ≤7 cm, N0M0) as per the American Joint Committee on Cancer version 8 staging system or isolated parenchymal recurrences (tumour size ≤7 cm) NSCLC (TanyNanyM0 before definitive surgery or chemoradiotherapy) were included in this trial. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1; using the Pocock & Simon method) to receive SABR with or without four cycles of nivolumab (480 mg, once every 4 weeks, with the first dose on the same day as, or within 36 h after, the first SABR fraction). This trial was unmasked. The primary endpoint was 4-year event-free survival (local, regional, or distant recurrence; second primary lung cancer; or death). Analyses were both intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03110978) and is closed to enrolment. FINDINGS From June 30, 2017, to March 22, 2022, 156 participants were randomly assigned, and 141 participants received assigned therapy. At a median 33 months' follow-up, I-SABR significantly improved 4-year event-free survival from 53% (95% CI 42-67%) with SABR to 77% (66-91%; per-protocol population, hazard ratio [HR] 0·38; 95% CI 0·19-0·75; p=0·0056; ITT population, HR 0·42; 95% CI 0·22-0·80; p=0·0080). There were no grade 3 or higher adverse events associated with SABR. In the I-SABR group, ten participants (15%) had grade 3 immunologial adverse events related to nivolumab; none had grade 3 pneumonitis or grade 4 or higher toxicity. INTERPRETATION Compared with SABR alone, I-SABR significantly improved event-free survival at 4 years in people with early-stage treatment-naive or lung parenchymal recurrent node-negative NSCLC, with tolerable toxicity. I-SABR could be a treatment option in these participants, but further confirmation from a number of currently accruing phase 3 trials is required. FUNDING Bristol-Myers Squibb and MD Anderson Cancer Center Alliance, National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health through Cancer Center Core Support Grant and Clinical and Translational Science Award to The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joe Y Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wenli Dong
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zhongxing Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Saumil J Gandhi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carl M Gay
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jianjun Zhang
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stephen G Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yasir Y Elamin
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Frank V Fossella
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - George Blumenschein
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tina Cascone
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiuning Le
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jenny V Pozadzides
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anne Tsao
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - James W Welsh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aileen B Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mehmet Altan
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Reza J Mehran
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ara A Vaporciyan
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stephen G Swisher
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peter A Balter
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Junya Fujimoto
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ignacio I Wistuba
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lei Feng
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J Jack Lee
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John V Heymach
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li R, Cheng K, Li X, Chang C, Lv W, Xiaoying L, Zhang P, Yang H, Cao D. Case report: Immunotherapy plus chemotherapy and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (ICSABR): a novel treatment combination for Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoepithelioma-like intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1147449. [PMID: 37614316 PMCID: PMC10443589 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1147449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoepithelioma-like intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EBVa LEL-ICC) is a rare tumor, characterized by a rich tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). While this tumor is reportedly sensitive to immunotherapy, its response has been inconsistent. This decreased sensitivity was associated with reduced TIME abundance. We report the case of a 53-year-old woman with EBVa LEL-ICC having reduced TIME abundance. The patient presented with a liver lesion, which was detected using ultrasound. Initially, the tumor was sensitive to immunotherapy and chemotherapy (IC), but resistance developed after a short interval. Subsequently, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) was added to the patient's treatment, which now consisted of ICSABR. Successful tumor shrinkage was achieved with the combination therapy regimen. Thus, surgery and ICSABR are effective adjuncts to the first-line IC therapy in improving the survival rate of patients with EBVa LEL-ICC. The results of this study support multidisciplinary treatment as a viable treatment strategy for EBVa LEL-ICC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruizhen Li
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Ke Cheng
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xiaofen Li
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Chen Chang
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Wanrui Lv
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Li Xiaoying
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Pei Zhang
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Heqi Yang
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Dan Cao
- Division of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Abdominal Oncology Ward, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kunkyab T, Mou B, Jirasek A, Haston C, Andrews J, Thomas S, Hyde D. Radiomic analysis for early differentiation of lung cancer recurrence from fibrosis in patients treated with lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:165015. [PMID: 37164024 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acd431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Objective. The development of radiation-induced fibrosis after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) can obscure follow-up images and delay detection of a local recurrence in early-stage lung cancer patients. The objective of this study was to develop a radiomics model for computer-assisted detection of local recurrence and fibrosis for an earlier timepoint (<1 year) after the SABR treatment.Approach. This retrospective clinical study included CT images (n= 107) of 66 patients treated with SABR. A z-score normalization technique was used for radiomic feature standardization across scanner protocols. The training set for the radiomics model consisted of CT images (66 patients; 22 recurrences and 44 fibrosis) obtained at 24 months (median) follow-up. The test set included CT-images of 41 patients acquired at 5-12 months follow-up. Combinations of four widely used machine learning techniques (support vector machines, gradient boosting, random forests (RF), and logistic regression) and feature selection methods (Relief feature scoring, maximum relevance minimum redundancy, mutual information maximization, forward feature selection, and LASSO) were investigated. Pyradiomics was used to extract 106 radiomic features from the CT-images for feature selection and classification.Main results. An RF + LASSO model scored the highest in terms of AUC (0.87) and obtained a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 88% in identifying a local recurrence in the test set. In the training set, 86% accuracy was achieved using five-fold cross-validation. Delong's test indicated that AUC achieved by the RF+LASSO is significantly better than 11 other machine learning models presented here. The top three radiomic features: interquartile range (first order), Cluster Prominence (GLCM), and Autocorrelation (GLCM), were revealed as differentiating a recurrence from fibrosis with this model.Significance. The radiomics model selected, out of multiple machine learning and feature selection algorithms, was able to differentiate a recurrence from fibrosis in earlier follow-up CT-images with a high specificity rate and satisfactory sensitivity performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tenzin Kunkyab
- Department of Physics, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Andrew Jirasek
- Department of Physics, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Christina Haston
- Department of Physics, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jeff Andrews
- Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Derek Hyde
- Department of Physics, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Cancer-Kelowna, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zayed S, Louie AV, Breadner DA, Palma DA, Correa RJM. Radiation and immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a practical review of rationale, recent data, and research questions. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231183668. [PMID: 37435562 PMCID: PMC10331344 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231183668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The combined use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is an emerging treatment paradigm for oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent phase I and II trial data suggest that SABR to multiple metastases in addition to ICI use is safe and effective with promising progression-free survival and overall survival signals. There is great interest in capitalizing on combined immunomodulation from these two modalities for the treatment of oligometastatic NSCLC. Ongoing trials seek to validate the safety, efficacy, and preferred sequencing of SABR and ICI. This narrative review of the role of SABR when combined with ICI in oligometastatic NSCLC discusses the rationale for this bimodality treatment, summarizes recent clinical trial evidence, and proposes key principles of management based on the available evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sondos Zayed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Alexander V. Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Hospital Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel A. Breadner
- Department of Medical Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - David A. Palma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zarkar A, Henderson D, Carver A, Heyes G, Harrop V, Tutill S, Kilkenny J, Marshall A, Elbeltagi N, Howard H. First UK patient cohort treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for primary kidney cancer. BJUI Compass 2023; 4:464-472. [PMID: 37334027 PMCID: PMC10268573 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a promising non-invasive ablative treatment option. A prospective interventional clinical trial published showed that treatment was feasible and well tolerated. We present the first single-institution UK cohort of patients with primary RCC receiving protocol-based SABR with prospective follow-up. We also present a protocol that could be used to facilitate more widespread use of the treatment. Materials and methods Nineteen biopsy-proven primary RCC patients were treated with either 42 Gy in three fractions on alternate days or 26 Gy in a single fraction based on predefined eligibility criteria using either Linear Accelerator or CyberKnife platform. Prospective toxicity data using CTCAE V4.0 and outcome data such as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and tumour response using CT thorax, abdomen and pelvis (CT-TAP) were collected at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post treatment. Results The 19 patients had a median age of 76 years (interquartile range [IQR] 64-82 years) and 47.4% were males, and they had a median tumour size of 4.5 cm (IQR 3.8-5.2 cm). Single and fractionated treatment was well tolerated and there were no significant acute side effects. The mean drop from baseline in eGFR at 6 months was 5.4 ml/min and that at 12 months was 8.7 ml/min. The overall local control rate at both 6 and 12 months was 94.4%. Overall survival at 6 and 12 months was 94.7% and 78.3%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 17 months, three patients experienced a Grade 3 toxicity, which was resolved with conservative management. Conclusion SABR for primary RCC is a safe and feasible treatment for medically unfit patients, which can be delivered in most UK cancer centres using standard Linear Accelerator as well as CyberKnife platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjali Zarkar
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK
| | - Dan Henderson
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK
| | - Antony Carver
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK
| | - Geoff Heyes
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK
| | - Victoria Harrop
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK
| | - Sarah Tutill
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK
| | - Julie Kilkenny
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK
| | | | | | - Helen Howard
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kamel R, Dennis K, Doody J, Pantarotto J. Ablative vs. Non-Ablative Radiotherapy in Palliating Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Single Institution Experience and a Systematic Review of the Literature. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15113016. [PMID: 37296977 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15113016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
We studied the dose-local control (LC) relationship in ablative vs. non-ablative radiotherapy in a non-radical treatment setting of "locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC)" by comparing our patients (n = 89) treated with SBRT on the CyberKnife unit vs. conventional radiation between January 2005 and January 2021, and by reviewing the literature. A systematic search was performed leveraging Medline for references on SBRT use in pancreatic cancer without date terms or language restrictions. A total of 3702 references were identified and the search was then repeated in Embase and the Cochrane database. Ultimately, 12 studies were eligible for inclusion, which either compared SBRT to conventional radiation, or SBRT use in dose escalation for primary LAPC in a non-neoadjuvant setting. Our cohort's median overall survival was 152 days (CI 95%, 118-185); including 371 days (CI 95%, 230-511) vs. 126 days (CI 95%, 90-161) favoring SBRT, p = 0.004. The median time to local progression was 170 days (48-923) for SBRT vs. 107 days (27-489) for the non-ablative group. In our SBRT patients, no local progressions were seen with BED10 > 60 Gy. Even when palliating LAPC, SBRT should be considered as an alternative to conventional radiation, especially in patients with a low disease burden. BED10 ≥ 60-70 Gy offers better local control without increasing toxicity rates. Less local progression may provide a better quality of life to those patients who already have a short life expectancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randa Kamel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussel, Belgium
| | - Kristopher Dennis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, Smyth Road 501, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Janice Doody
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, Smyth Road 501, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Jason Pantarotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, Smyth Road 501, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bryant JM, Weygand J, Keit E, Cruz-Chamorro R, Sandoval ML, Oraiqat IM, Andreozzi J, Redler G, Latifi K, Feygelman V, Rosenberg SA. Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance-Guided Adaptive and Non-Adaptive Radiotherapy on Combination MR-Linear Accelerators: Current Practice and Future Directions. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2081. [PMID: 37046741 PMCID: PMC10093051 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective radiation therapy technique that has allowed for shorter treatment courses, as compared to conventionally dosed radiation therapy. As its name implies, SBRT relies on daily image guidance to ensure that each fraction targets a tumor, instead of healthy tissue. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers improved soft-tissue visualization, allowing for better tumor and normal tissue delineation. MR-guided RT (MRgRT) has traditionally been defined by the use of offline MRI to aid in defining the RT volumes during the initial planning stages in order to ensure accurate tumor targeting while sparing critical normal tissues. However, the ViewRay MRIdian and Elekta Unity have improved upon and revolutionized the MRgRT by creating a combined MRI and linear accelerator (MRL), allowing MRgRT to incorporate online MRI in RT. MRL-based MR-guided SBRT (MRgSBRT) represents a novel solution to deliver higher doses to larger volumes of gross disease, regardless of the proximity of at-risk organs due to the (1) superior soft-tissue visualization for patient positioning, (2) real-time continuous intrafraction assessment of internal structures, and (3) daily online adaptive replanning. Stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) has enabled the safe delivery of ablative doses to tumors adjacent to radiosensitive tissues throughout the body. Although it is still a relatively new RT technique, SMART has demonstrated significant opportunities to improve disease control and reduce toxicity. In this review, we included the current clinical applications and the active prospective trials related to SMART. We highlighted the most impactful clinical studies at various tumor sites. In addition, we explored how MRL-based multiparametric MRI could potentially synergize with SMART to significantly change the current treatment paradigm and to improve personalized cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Stephen A. Rosenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (J.M.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jenkins R, Walker J, Roy UB. Plain language summary and patient perspective of the revised STARS study: long-term results of a study that compared the effectiveness of radiotherapy to surgery in people with non-small-cell lung cancer. Future Oncol 2023. [PMID: 36935643 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-1211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/21/2023] Open
Abstract
WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT? This is a summary of a research study called revised STARS. The STARS study involved people with non-small-cell lung cancer, also known as NSCLC. The cancer was less than 5 cm in size and had not spread to other parts of the body (known as stage 1 cancer). The study compared the effectiveness of surgery versus a type of radiotherapy treatment, called stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (also known as SABR) as a treatment for people with NSCLC. Researchers wanted to find out how likely people were to be alive after treatment or if their cancer had grown or spread to other parts of their body (also known as progressed). WHAT WERE THE RESULTS? The study found that the long term outcomes were similar between SABR and surgery. People with NSCLC were as likely to be alive 3 years after treatment with SABR compared to surgery. WHAT DO THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY MEAN? SABR may be an alternative to surgery for people with stage 1 NSCLC which is less than 5 cm in size and has not spread to other parts of the body Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02357992 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Collapse
|
17
|
Mark F, Alnsour A, Penfold SN, Esterman A, Keys R, Le H. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) comparison to 3D-conformal technique in lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). J Med Radiat Sci 2023; 70:72-80. [PMID: 36424510 PMCID: PMC9977664 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) can be a curative option for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and oligometastatic lung disease. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has offered further advancements in terms of radiation dose shaping without compromising treatment times however there is potential for greater low-dose exposure to the lung. This study was to assess whether VMAT lung SABR would result in any increase to the dosimetry parameters compared with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) that could confer increased risk of radiation pneumonitis. METHODS A total of 53 and 30 3D-CRT treatment plans of patients treated with 48 Gy in 4 fractions were compared. RESULTS No statistically significant difference in planning target volumes between the VMAT 29.9 cc (range 12.4-58.5 cc) and 3D-CRT 31.2 cc (range 12.3-58.3 cc) P = 0.79. The mean of total lung V5, ipsilateral lung V5 and contralateral lung V5 all showed a trend of being smaller in the VMAT treatment group- 14% versus 15.8%, 25.6% versus 30.4% and 1.6% versus 2.2%, respectively, but all were not statistically significant differences. Mean of the mean lung dose MLD, again showed a trend of being lower in the VMAT treatments but was also non-significant, 2.6 Gy versus 3.0 Gy, P = 1.0. Mean V20 was the same in both cohorts, 3.3%. CONCLUSIONS The dosimetry for 3D-CRT and VMAT plans were not significantly different including V5, and therefore we conclude that VMAT treatment is unlikely to be associated with an increased risk of radiation pneumonitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances Mark
- Department of Radiation OncologyRoyal Adelaide HospitalAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia,Oncology DepartmentPlymouth Hospitals TrustPlymouthUK
| | | | - Scott N. Penfold
- Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and ResearchAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia,Department of PhysicsUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia,SAHMRIAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Adrian Esterman
- Clinical and Health SciencesUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Robert Keys
- Department of Radiation OncologyRoyal Adelaide HospitalAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation OncologyRoyal Adelaide HospitalAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia,Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and ResearchAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia,Clinical and Health SciencesUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sadrolashrafi K, Samlowski W. Retreatment of Patients With Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma Who Relapse After Elective Checkpoint Inhibitor Discontinuation After a Complete Remission. Oncologist 2023; 28:e270-e275. [PMID: 36852837 PMCID: PMC10166161 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Checkpoint blockade has improved the response rate and survival in metastatic melanoma. Elective treatment discontinuation appears to be reasonable in most patients who have achieved a confirmed complete remission. It seems crucial to understand whether restarting immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy can induce additional responses or remissions in rare patients who relapse. METHODS A retrospective analysis identified only 10 patients who relapsed after elective treatment discontinuation after a radiologically confirmed remission. These patients were retreated with single-agent PD-1 or combined CTLA-4 plus PD-1-directed monoclonal antibodies. RESULTS We found an initial complete response rate of 20% (2 patients) following retreatment. With a median follow-up of 26 months, the addition of individualized salvage therapies converted an additional 4 patients to a 2nd remission. All 6 of these patients have again discontinued therapy. Three patients have died of metastatic melanoma, while another is receiving salvage therapy. Six of our 10 patients experienced grades 2-3 retreatment-related toxicity. There were no hospitalizations or fatalities. DISCUSSION Retreatment of relapsing patients resulted in 20% complete responses with checkpoint inhibitors. The planned addition of other treatment modalities converted another 4 patients (40%) to a durable 2nd remission. This sequential approach merits further exploration in prospective clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wolfram Samlowski
- Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, NV, USA.,Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.,University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno, NV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Stares M, Lewis G, Vallet M, Killean A, Tramonti G, Patrizio A, Mackean M, Harrow S, Barrie C, MacLennan K, Campbell S, Evans T, Tufail A, Hall P, Phillips I. Real-World Impact of SABR on Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Outcomes at a Scottish Cancer Centre. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051431. [PMID: 36900224 PMCID: PMC10000454 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) offers patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) a safe, effective radical therapy option. The impact of introducing SABR at a Scottish regional cancer centre was studied. METHODS The Edinburgh Cancer Centre Lung Cancer Database was assessed. Treatment patterns and outcomes were compared across treatment groups (no radical therapy (NRT), conventional radical radiotherapy (CRRT), SABR and surgery) and across three time periods reflecting the availability of SABR (A, January 2012/2013 (pre-SABR); B, 2014/2016 (introduction of SABR); C, 2017/2019, (SABR established)). RESULTS 1143 patients with stage I NSCLC were identified. Treatment was NRT in 361 (32%), CRRT in 182 (16%), SABR in 132 (12%) and surgery in 468 (41%) patients. Age, performance status, and comorbidities correlated with treatment choice. The median survival increased from 32.5 months in time period A to 38.8 months in period B to 48.8 months in time period C. The greatest improvement in survival was seen in patients treated with surgery between time periods A and C (HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.56-0.86), p < 0.001). The proportion of patients receiving a radical therapy rose between time periods A and C in younger (age ≤ 65, 65-74 and 75-84 years), fitter (PS 0 and 1), and less comorbid patients (CCI 0 and 1-2), but fell in other patient groups. CONCLUSIONS The introduction and establishment of SABR for stage I NSCLC has improved survival outcomes in Southeast Scotland. Increasing SABR utilisation appears to have enhanced the selection of surgical patients and increased the proportion of patients receiving a radical therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Stares
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +44-1315371000
| | - Georgina Lewis
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK
| | - Maheva Vallet
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK
| | - Angus Killean
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK
| | - Giovanni Tramonti
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK
| | - Ailsa Patrizio
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Melanie Mackean
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Stephen Harrow
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Colin Barrie
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Kirsty MacLennan
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Sorcha Campbell
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Tamasin Evans
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Aisha Tufail
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Edinburgh Cancer Informatics Programme
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK
| | - Peter Hall
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK
| | - Iain Phillips
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rong Y, Ding X, Daly ME. Hypofractionation and SABR: 25 years of evolution in medical physics and a glimpse of the future. Med Phys 2023. [PMID: 36756953 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
As we were invited to write an article for celebrating the 50th Anniversary of Medical Physics journal, on something historically significant, commemorative, and exciting happening in the past decades, the first idea came to our mind is the fascinating radiotherapy paradigm shift from conventional fractionation to hypofractionation and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). It is historically and clinically significant since as we all know this RT treatment revolution not only reduces treatment duration for patients, but also improves tumor control and cancer treatment outcomes. It is also commemorative and exciting for us medical physicists since the technology development in medical physics has been the main driver for the success of this treatment regimen which requires high precision and accuracy throughout the entire treatment planning and delivery. This article provides an overview of the technological development and clinical trials evolvement in the past 25 years for hypofractionation and SABR, with an outlook to the future improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Rong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Xuanfeng Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Megan E Daly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Resová K, Paračková T, Cvek J. Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Klin Onkol 2023; 36:370-377. [PMID: 37877529 DOI: 10.48095/ccko2023370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is now a standard treatment option for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) who are unfit for surgery or refuse to undergo an operation. SBRT is a method of external beam radiotherapy that accurately delivers a high dose of irradiation in one or few treatment fractions. Intensive regimens of biologically effective dose ≥ 100 Gy are associated with good local control and overall survival, higher than in conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. There are still controversial areas in the SBRT indication where data are limited - indications for elderly and comorbid patients, indications for treatment without histological verification, treatment of central/ultracentral lesions, indications for tumors larger than 5 cm, indications for operable patients. The optimal follow-up practice of these patients also remains unclear, including the frequency of imaging, the use of PET-CT, and requirements for biopsy. CT changes after SBRT differ from those following conventional radiotherapy and it is difficult to distinguish them from tumor recurrence. Due to the high local control achieved with lung SBRT, data on the treatment of local failure are insufficient. PURPOSE The aim of the publication is to demonstrate the current information and the importance of SBRT for patients with ES-NSCLC.
Collapse
|
22
|
McMillan MT, Shepherd AF, Kang M, Lin L, Shaverdian N, Wu AJ, Gelblum DY, Ohri N, Lazarev S, Xu L, Chhabra AM, Hasan S, Choi JI, Gomez DR, Rimner A, Lin H, Simone CB. Safety and efficacy of stereotactic body proton therapy for high-risk lung tumors. J Radiosurg SBRT 2023; 9:63-74. [PMID: 38029007 PMCID: PMC10681142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Stereotactic body proton therapy (SBPT) is an emerging treatment strategy for lung tumors that aims to combine the excellent local control benefits of ultra-hypofractionation with the physical advantages of protons, which reduce the integral dose to organs at risk (OARs) compared to photons. To date, however, very little data delivering SBPT in 5 or fewer fractions to lung tumors have been reported. Given that photon stereotactic body radiation therapy can struggle to deliver ablative doses to high-risk tumors (i.e., central/ultra-central location, prior in-field radiation, tumor size >5 cm, or the presence of severe pulmonary comorbidities) while adhering to OAR dose constraints, we hypothesized that SBPT would be an effective alternative for patients with high-risk tumors. Methods and Materials Twenty-seven high-risk patients with 29 lung tumors treated with SBPT at the New York Proton Center between December 2019 and November 2022 were retrospectively identified. Patients were divided into three major subgroups: early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), locally recurrent NSCLC, and metastatic cancer from lung cancer or other histologies. Patient characteristics were reported using descriptive statistics, actuarial methods were used to quantify disease control rates, and toxicities were scored using CTCAE v 5.0. Results The most common high-risk indications for SBPT were central/ultra-central tumor location (69.0%), severe COPD (48.1%), reirradiation (44.4%), significant pulmonary fibrosis (22.2%), and large tumor size > 5 cm (18.5%). In total, 96.6% of tumors were fully covered by the prescription dose without compromising target coverage. Three-year actuarial rates of local control for early-stage NSCLC, locally recurrent NSCLC, and metastatic patients were 89%, 100%, and 43%, respectively. Three-year actuarial rates of regional control were 89%, 67%, and 86%. Three-year actuarial rates of distant metastasis-free survival were 79%, 100%, and 0%. Two patients (7.4%), both of whom had clinically significant baseline interstitial lung disease and pre-treatment continuous oxygen demand, experienced grade ≥2 pulmonary toxicity (1 grade 3, 1 grade 5). There were no acute or late grade ≥2 toxicities related to esophagitis, cardiac injury, airway injury, pulmonary fibrosis, bronchopulmonary hemorrhage or brachial plexopathy. Conclusions In the largest study of proton SBRT reported to date, SBPT has a favorable toxicity profile while being an effective approach for treating most high-risk tumors without requiring dose de-escalation or compromising tumor coverage and warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew T. McMillan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Annemarie F. Shepherd
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Liyong Lin
- Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Narek Shaverdian
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Abraham J. Wu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daphna Y. Gelblum
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nitin Ohri
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
- Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Stanislav Lazarev
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lee Xu
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arpit M. Chhabra
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shaakir Hasan
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
- Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - J. Isabelle Choi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel R. Gomez
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Haibo Lin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
- Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Charles B. Simone
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Detti B, Carnevale MG, Lucidi S, Burchini L, Caini S, Orsatti C, Bertini N, Roghi M, di Cataldo V, Fondelli S, Ingrosso G, Francolini G, Scartoni D, Sardaro A, Pisani A, Scoccianti S, Aristei C, Livi L. Choline PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1079808. [PMID: 37025599 PMCID: PMC10070677 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1079808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Biochemical recurrence (BR) occurs in up to 40% of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with primary radical prostatectomy (RP). Choline PET/CT may show, in a single-step examination, the site of tumor recurrence earlier than traditional imaging methods, particularly at low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, thus influencing subsequent treatment. Methods/patients Patients with recurrent and non-metastatic prostate cancer (nmPCa), who were assessed with choline PET/CT, were included in the analysis. Based on imaging results, the following therapeutic strategies were chosen: radiotherapy to the prostatic bed, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and chemotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to either the pelvic lymph nodes or distant metastases. We assessed the impact of age, PSA levels, Gleason score (GS), and adjuvant therapy on oncological outcomes. Results Data from 410 consecutive nmPCa patients with BR who underwent RP as primary treatment were analyzed. One hundred seventy-six (42.9%) patients had a negative choline PET/CT, and 234 (57.1%) patients resulted positive. In the multivariate analysis, only chemotherapy and PSA at recurrence were significant independent prognostic factors on overall survival (OS). In the PET-positive subgroup, the number of relapses, PSA post-prostatectomy, and chemotherapy impacted on OS. PSA (post-surgery and at recurrence) affected progression-free survival (PFS) in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, GS, the number of relapse sites, and PSA (post-surgery and at recurrence) were significant prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS). Conclusion Choline PET/CT provides better accuracy than conventional imaging for the assessment of nmPCa with BR after prostatectomy, thereby enabling salvage strategies and improving quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice Detti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Carnevale
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Sara Lucidi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Burchini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Saverio Caini
- Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network - Istituto per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologia (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Carolina Orsatti
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Niccolò Bertini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Manuele Roghi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- *Correspondence: Manuele Roghi,
| | - Vanessa di Cataldo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Simona Fondelli
- Struttura Organizzativa Complessa (SOC) Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata, Bagno a Ripoli, Firenze, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale (USL) Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniele Scartoni
- Proton Therapy Center-Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| | | | | | - Silvia Scoccianti
- Struttura Organizzativa Complessa (SOC) Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata, Bagno a Ripoli, Firenze, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale (USL) Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
McMillan MT, Kang M, Shepherd AF, Liu W, Lin L, Lin H, Simone CB. Stereotactic body proton therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical indications and recommendations. J Radiosurg SBRT 2023; 9:17-32. [PMID: 38029014 PMCID: PMC10681144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a standard treatment approach for early-stage lung cancer and intrathoracic oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease. While local control is often excellent with this modality when delivered with photon therapy, toxicities for select patients can be significant. Proton therapy offers a unique opportunity to widen the therapeutic window when treating patients with thoracic malignancies requiring or benefitting from ultra-high doses per fraction. Thoracic proton SBRT may be particularly beneficial in cases requiring dose escalation, for tumors >5 cm, for central or ultra-central tumors, for reirradiation, in patients with interstitial lung diseases, and when combining radiation with immunotherapy. These clinical indications are detailed, along with supporting literature and clinical recommendations. Other considerations, future directions and potential benefits of proton SBRT, including sparing lymphocytes, when delivered as intensity-modulated proton therapy or as FLASH, and for the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer or in patients with homologous recombination repair deficiencies, are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew T. McMillan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Annemarie F. Shepherd
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiation Oncology, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Liyong Lin
- Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Haibo Lin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles B. Simone
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zaki P, Chuong MD, Schaub SK, Lo SS, Ibrahim M, Apisarnthanarax S. Proton Beam Therapy and Photon-Based Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Radiation Therapy: The Next Frontiers of Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2023; 22:15330338231206335. [PMID: 37908130 PMCID: PMC10621304 DOI: 10.1177/15330338231206335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) has increasingly been utilized in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) due to technological advances with positive clinical outcomes. Innovations in EBRT include improved image guidance, motion management, treatment planning, and highly conformal techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Moreover, proton beam therapy (PBT) and magnetic resonance image-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) have expanded the capabilities of EBRT. PBT offers the advantage of minimizing low- and moderate-dose radiation to the surrounding normal tissue, thereby preserving uninvolved liver and allowing for dose escalation. MRgRT provides the advantage of improved soft tissue delineation compared to computerized tomography (CT) guidance. Additionally, MRgRT with online adaptive therapy is particularly useful for addressing motion not otherwise managed and reducing high-dose radiation to the normal tissue such as the stomach and bowel. PBT and online adaptive MRgRT are emerging technological advancements in EBRT that may provide a significant clinical benefit for patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Zaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Michael D. Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Stephanie K. Schaub
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Simon S. Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Mariam Ibrahim
- School of Medicine, St. George's University, St. George's, Grenada
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ng SSW, Dawson LA. Inflammatory Cytokines and Radiotherapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Biomedicines 2022; 10. [PMID: 36551971 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a therapeutic challenge in clinical oncology. Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment. However, the majority of PDAC patients present with locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic disease, where palliative multiagent chemotherapy is the first-line treatment with the therapeutic intent to delay progression and prolong survival. For locally advanced/unresectable pancreatic cancer patients who are treated with chemotherapy, consolidative radiotherapy in the form concurrent chemoradiation or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy improves locoregional control and pain/symptom control. To improve clinical outcomes of PDAC patients, there is a dire need for discoveries that will shed more light on the pathophysiology of the disease and lead to the development of more efficacious treatment strategies. Inflammatory cytokines are known to play a role in mediating tumor progression, chemoresistance, and radioresistance in PDAC. A PubMed search on published articles related to radiotherapy, inflammatory cytokines, and pancreatic cancer patients in the English language was performed. This article primarily focuses on reviewing the clinical literature that examines the association of inflammatory cytokines with clinical outcomes and the effects of radiotherapy on inflammatory cytokines in PDAC patients.
Collapse
|
27
|
Saha A, Dickinson P, Shrimali RK, Salem A, Agarwal S. Is Thoracic Radiotherapy an Absolute Contraindication for Treatment of Lung Cancer Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease? A Systematic Review. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:e493-504. [PMID: 35168842 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.01.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Thoracic radiotherapy decisions in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) are complex due to concerns about severe or even fatal radiation pneumonitis. This systematic review analysed the published evidence regarding the incidence of radiation pneumonitis and mortality after thoracic radiotherapy and investigated clinical and dosimetric predictors of radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients with ILD. A systematic search was carried out in PubMed, Medline, Embase and the Cochrane database for articles published between January 2000 and April 2021. Two authors independently screened eligible studies that met our predefined criteria. Studies were assessed for design and quality and a qualitative data synthesis was carried out. The search strategy resulted in 1750 articles. After two rounds of screening, 24 publications were included. The median overall incidence of grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis was 19.7% (range 8-46%). The incidence was greater in conventional radical radiotherapy-treated patients (median 31.8%) compared with particle beam therapy- or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy-treated patients (median 12.5%). The median rate of grade 5 radiation pneumonitis was 11.9% (range 0-60%). The presence of ILD was an independent predictor of severe radiation pneumonitis. Severe radiation pneumonitis was more common in the presence of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern or idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) than non-UIP or non-IPF subtype. Several other clinical predictors were reported in the literature. V5, V10, V20 and mean lung dose were the most common dosimetric predictors for severe radiation pneumonitis, often with stricter dose constraints than conventionally used. Patients with lung cancer associated with ILD had a poorer overall survival compared with patients without ILD. In conclusion, patients with lung cancer associated with ILD have a poor prognosis. They are at high risk of severe and even fatal radiation pneumonitis. Careful patient selection is necessary, appropriate high-risk consenting and strict lung dose-volume constraints should be used, if these patients are to be treated with thoracic radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
28
|
Ratnakumaran R, McDonald F. The Management of Oligometastases in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer - is Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy now Standard of Care? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:753-760. [PMID: 36117126 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.08.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer encompasses a number of distinct clinical scenarios with a pattern of limited tumour burden on imaging. Delivering local ablative therapy to individual metastatic lesions may assist in disease modification and contribute to improved outcomes. We review the published randomised clinical trials that support the implementation of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy as a standard of care in certain oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer clinical scenarios, and highlight the current knowledge gaps and areas of ongoing research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Ratnakumaran
- The Lung Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - F McDonald
- The Lung Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Perrett B, Ukath J, Horgan E, Noble C, Ramachandran P. A Framework for ExacTrac Dynamic Commissioning for Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy. J Med Phys 2022; 47:398-408. [PMID: 36908493 PMCID: PMC9997535 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_67_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
This paper aims to provide guidance and a framework for commissioning tests and tolerances for the ExacTrac Dynamic image-guided and surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) system. ExacTrac Dynamic includes a stereoscopic X-ray system, a structured light projector, stereoscopic cameras, thermal camera for SGRT, and has the capability to track breath holds and internal markers. The system provides fast and accurate image guidance and intrafraction guidance for stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. ExacTrac Dynamic was commissioned on a recently installed Elekta Versa HD. Commissioning tests are described including safety, isocenter calibration, dosimetry, image quality, data transfer, SGRT stability, SGRT localization, gating, fusion, implanted markers, breath hold, and end-to-end testing. Custom phantom designs have been implemented for assessment of the deep inspiration breath-hold workflow, the implanted markers workflow, and for gating tests where remote-controlled movement of a phantom is required. Commissioning tests were all found to be in tolerance, with maximum translational and rotational deviations in SGRT of 0.3 mm and 0.4°, respectively, and X-ray image fusion reproducibility standard deviation of 0.08 mm. Tolerances were based on published documents and upon the performance characteristics of the system as specified by the vendor. The unique configuration of ExacTrac Dynamic requires the end user to design commissioning tests that validate the system for use in the clinical implementation adopted in the department. As there are multiple customizable workflows available, tests should be designed around these workflows, and can be ongoing as workflows are progressively introduced into departmental procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Perrett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jaysree Ukath
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Emma Horgan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Chris Noble
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Prabhakar Ramachandran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kim H, Kim SM, Yang DS, Lee KH, Kim YB. Clinical Outcomes of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for All Stages of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; Definitive versus Consolidative. Medicina (Kaunas) 2022; 58:medicina58091304. [PMID: 36143981 PMCID: PMC9506516 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58091304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is not confined to early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and has a potential role in stage IV disease. We aimed to evaluate the effect of SABR on local control rates and survival outcomes in patients with all stages of NSCLC according to the treatment aim. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 88 patients with NSCLC who received SABR at the Korea University Guro Hospital between January 2015 and March 2021. Among these, 64 patients with stage I–II NSCLC ineligible for surgery were treated with a definitive aim. Twenty-four patients with stage IV limited metastatic NSCLC showing a favorable response to prior systemic therapy were treated with a consolidative aim. Results: The median follow-up time was 34 (range: 5–88) months. Thirty-one patients developed recurrence (35.2%), with distant metastasis being the most common (25/31, 80.6%). In-field local recurrence occurred in four patients (4/88 patients, 4.5%). For patients treated with definitive SABR, the 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 91.8% and 58.6%, respectively. In patients treated with consolidative SABR, the 3-year OS and DFS rates were 86.7% and 53.8%, respectively. With respect to treatment-related pulmonary toxicity, grade 3 radiation pneumonitis incidence requiring hospitalization was 2.3% (2/88). Conclusions: Definitive SABR is appropriate for medically inoperable or high surgical risk patients with early stage NSCLC with acceptable treatment-related toxicities. Consolidative SABR improves local control rates and helps achieve long-term survival in patients with limited metastatic NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hakyoung Kim
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 08308, Korea
| | - Sun Myung Kim
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 08308, Korea
| | - Dae Sik Yang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 08308, Korea
| | - Kyung Hwa Lee
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 08308, Korea
| | - Young Bum Kim
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 08308, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kim H, Venkatesulu BP, McMillan MT, Verma V, Lin SH, Chang JY, Welsh JW. Local Therapy for Oligoprogressive Disease: A Systematic Review of Prospective Trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:676-683. [PMID: 35973624 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The successes of local therapy for oligometastatic cancers cannot be extrapolated to oligoprogressive disease (OPD) because they are distinct clinical entities. Given the limited prospective data on OPD to date, summative analyses are urgently needed. METHODS Inclusion criteria for this PRISMA-guided systematic review were as follows. First, only prospective data were included. Second, progression had to have occurred on active/ongoing systemic therapy. Third, the number of progressing areas of disease had to be explicitly listed and ≤5 in number. Fourth, all progressing sites had to undergo local therapy (radiotherapy/surgery/non-radiation ablative procedures). RESULTS Eight trials met criteria (summing 290 patients), the vast majority of which utilized stereotactic radiotherapy as the local modality (most commonly, 19-20 Gy in 1 fraction, 27-33 Gy in 3 fractions, or 35-50 Gy in 5 fractions). A study on NSCLC demonstrated that stereotactic radiotherapy improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival compared to historical values with systemic therapy alone. Two additional studies on EGFR-mutated NSCLC also showed acceptable PFS with local therapy, particularly in patients who oligoprogressed on osimertinib. The only randomized trial analyzed herein showed that local therapy improved PFS for NSCLC but not breast cancer. Two trials in castration-resistant prostate cancer illustrated that a substantial proportion of patients did not require any changes in hormonal therapy and/or delayed the need to change systemic therapies. Lastly, two trials of renal cell carcinoma showed high (90-100%) local control and median PFS of 9 months, and potentially a prolonged time to change systemic therapy. Lastly, from all patients in all trials, local therapy was tolerated well, with only 7 instances of grade 3+ toxicities. CONCLUSIONS Based on the limited data, local therapy for OPD is safe and yields encouraging short-term preliminary outcomes, but trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are required for more robust conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Kim
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Bhanu P Venkatesulu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Matthew T McMillan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joe Y Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - James W Welsh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Suh YG, Noh JM, Lee DY, Kim TH, Bayasgalan U, Pyo H, Moon SH. Proton Beam Therapy versus Photon Radiotherapy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153627. [PMID: 35892885 PMCID: PMC9329768 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SABR) is accepted as a standard of care for patients who are not candidates for surgery in stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). SABR has shown encouraging disease control and acceptable toxicity in peripherally located stage I NSCLC. However, for centrally located tumors around the proximal bronchial tree or for tumors located close to the chest wall, toxicities by SABR are not negligible. Therefore, proton beam therapy (PBT), which provides better organ at risk (OAR) sparing than photon radiotherapy by the Bragg peak, was tested and investigated to reduce radiation-induced toxicities in stage I NSCLC. Here, we compared 112 and 117 stage I NSCLC patients who underwent PBT and photon radiotherapy, respectively. PBT showed significantly lower lung and heart radiation exposure than photon radiotherapy without worsening disease control. PBT could be an effective treatment to reduce long-term toxicities of the lung and heart. Abstract Proton beam therapy (PBT) and photon radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were compared in terms of clinical outcomes and dosimetry. Data were obtained from patients who underwent PBT or photon radiotherapy at two institutions—the only two facilities where PBT is available in the Republic of Korea. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score-matched analyses were used to compare local progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Survival and radiation exposure to the lungs were compared in the matched population. Of 289 patients included in the analyses, 112 and 177 underwent PBT and photon radiotherapy, respectively. With a median follow-up duration of 27 months, the 2-year local PFS and OS rates were 94.0% and 83.0%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, a biologically effective dose (BED10, using α/β = 10 Gy) of ≥125 cobalt gray equivalents was significantly associated with improved local PFS and OS. In the matched analyses, the local PFS and OS did not differ between groups. However, PBT showed significantly lower lung and heart radiation exposure in the mean dose, V5, and V10 than photon radiotherapy. PBT significantly reduced radiation exposure to the heart and lungs without worsening disease control in stage I NSCLC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang-Gun Suh
- Proton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (Y.-G.S.); (D.Y.L.); (T.H.K.); (U.B.)
| | - Jae Myoung Noh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea;
| | - Doo Yeul Lee
- Proton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (Y.-G.S.); (D.Y.L.); (T.H.K.); (U.B.)
| | - Tae Hyun Kim
- Proton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (Y.-G.S.); (D.Y.L.); (T.H.K.); (U.B.)
| | - Unurjargal Bayasgalan
- Proton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (Y.-G.S.); (D.Y.L.); (T.H.K.); (U.B.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center, Ulaanbaatar 13370, Mongolia
| | - Hongryull Pyo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea;
- Correspondence: (H.P.); (S.H.M.)
| | - Sung Ho Moon
- Proton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (Y.-G.S.); (D.Y.L.); (T.H.K.); (U.B.)
- Correspondence: (H.P.); (S.H.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hannan R, Dohopolski MJ, Pop LM, Mannala S, Watumull L, Mathews D, Gao A, Garant A, Arriaga YE, Bowman I, Chung JS, Wang J, Ariizumi K, Ahn C, Timmerman R, Courtney K. Phase II Trial of Sipuleucel-T and Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation for Patients with Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Biomedicines 2022; 10. [PMID: 35740441 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10061419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) We hypothesized that adding concurrent stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) would increase the time to progression in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPCA) treated with sipuleucel-T. (2) Patients with a history of prostate cancer (PC), radiographic evidence of metastatic disease, and rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 0.2 ng/dL on castrate testosterone levels were enrolled in this single-arm phase II clinical trial and treated with sipuleucel-T and SAbR. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP). Cellular and humoral responses were measured using ELISpot and Luminex multiplex assays, respectively. (3) Twenty patients with mCRPC were enrolled and treated with SAbR to 1−3 sites. Treatment was well tolerated with 51, 8, and 4 treatment-related grade 1, 2, and 3 toxicities, respectively, and no grade 4 or 5 adverse events. At a median follow-up of 15.5 months, the median TTP was 11.2 weeks (95% CI; 6.8−14.0 weeks). Median OS was 76.8 weeks (95% CI; 41.6−130.8 weeks). This regimen induced both humoral and cellular immune responses. Baseline M-MDSC levels were elevated in mCRPC patients compared to healthy donors (p = 0.004) and a decline in M-MDSC was associated with biochemical response (p = 0.044). Responders had lower baseline uric acid levels (p = 0.05). No clear correlation with radiographic response was observed. (4) While the regimen was safe, the PC-antigen-specific immune response induced by SAbR did not yield a synergistic clinical benefit for patients treated with sipuleucel-T compared to the historically reported outcomes.
Collapse
|
34
|
Verma V, Yegya-Raman N, Sprave T, Han G, Kantarjian HM, Welsh JW, Chang JY, Lin SH. A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies of Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Cancer Oligometastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:977-988. [PMID: 35675852 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.05.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is crucial to economically justify the use of promising therapies such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastatic disease (OMD). The goal of this systematic review was to summatively evaluate publications that analyzed the cost-effectiveness of SABR for OMD. METHODS AND MATERIALS Using PRISMA-guided methodology, PubMed and EMBASE were searched for modeling-based cost effectiveness (CE) studies for various forms of limited metastatic disease. Only full publications that specifically compared SABR with a systemic therapy-based approach were included. RESULTS Of 9 studies, 4 pertained to OMD with mixed histologies, 2 to oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer, 1 to pulmonary OMD, 1 to liver OMD, and 1 to low-volume oligorecurrent castration-sensitive prostate cancer. All but one investigation illustrated that SABR was cost-effective for the studied population (or a subpopulation); of these studies, the incremental CE ratios (ICERs) for SABR (when reported) ranged from $28,000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) to $55,000/QALY. Of studies that reported the probability of SABR being cost-effective at common willingness-to-pay values, the median (range) probability of achieving CE was roughly 61% (30-88%) at a $50,000/QALY threshold and 78% (31%-100%) at a $100,000/QALY threshold. CONCLUSIONS The available evidence suggests that SABR is a cost-effective approach for OMD, which has implications for value-based oncologic practice and construction of future health policies. However, re-assessment is required in the context of modern systemic therapies (e.g. immunotherapy) as well as long-term follow-up of existing and newly reported randomized trials. Prudent patient selection remains the single most important factor influencing the CE of SABR for OMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nikhil Yegya-Raman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Guang Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Hagop M Kantarjian
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - James W Welsh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joe Y Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Yoo SK, Kim TH, Chun J, Choi BS, Kim H, Yang S, Yoon HI, Kim JS. Deep-Learning-Based Automatic Detection and Segmentation of Brain Metastases with Small Volume for Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2555. [PMID: 35626158 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary With advances in radiotherapy (RT) technique and more frequent use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), precise segmentation of all brain metastases (BM) including a small volume of BM is essential to choose an appropriate treatment modality. However, the process of detecting and manually delineating BM with small volumes often results in missing delineation and requires a great amount of labor. To address this issue, we present a useful deep learning (DL) model for the detection and segmentation of BMwith contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Specifically, we applied effective training techniques to detect and segment a BM of less than 0.04 cc, which is relatively small compared to previous studies. The results of our DL model demonstrated that the proposed methods provide considerable benefit for BM, even small-volume BM, detection, and segmentation for SABR. Abstract Recently, several efforts have been made to develop the deep learning (DL) algorithms for automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases (BM). In this study, we developed an advanced DL model to BM detection and segmentation, especially for small-volume BM. From the institutional cancer registry, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images of 65 patients and 603 BM were collected to train and evaluate our DL model. Of the 65 patients, 12 patients with 58 BM were assigned to test-set for performance evaluation. Ground-truth for BM was assigned to one radiation oncologist to manually delineate BM and another one to cross-check. Unlike other previous studies, our study dealt with relatively small BM, so the area occupied by the BM in the high-resolution images were small. Our study applied training techniques such as the overlapping patch technique and 2.5-dimensional (2.5D) training to the well-known U-Net architecture to learn better in smaller BM. As a DL architecture, 2D U-Net was utilized by 2.5D training. For better efficacy and accuracy of a two-dimensional U-Net, we applied effective preprocessing include 2.5D overlapping patch technique. The sensitivity and average false positive rate were measured as detection performance, and their values were 97% and 1.25 per patient, respectively. The dice coefficient with dilation and 95% Hausdorff distance were measured as segmentation performance, and their values were 75% and 2.057 mm, respectively. Our DL model can detect and segment BM with small volume with good performance. Our model provides considerable benefit for clinicians with automatic detection and segmentation of BM for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
36
|
Haque W, Singh A, Park HS, Teh BS, Butler EB, Zeng M, Lin SH, Welsh JW, Chang JY, Verma V. Quantifying the rate and predictors of occult lymph node involvement in patients with clinically node-negative non-small cell lung cancer. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:403-408. [PMID: 34913815 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.2012253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is essential to evaluate the risk of occult lymph node (LN) disease in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially because delivering stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) assumes no occult spread. This study was designed to assist clinicians in roughly quantifying this risk for cN0 NSCLC. METHODS The National Cancer Data Base was queried for cN0 cM0 lung squamous cell or adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery and LN dissection without neoadjuvant therapy. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with pN + disease. RESULTS 109,964 patients were included. For tumors with size ≤1.0, 1.1-2.0, 2.1-3.0, 3.1-4.0, 4.1-5.0, 5.1-6.0, 6.1-7.0, and >7.0 cm, the pN + rate was 4.4, 7.7, 12.9, 18.0, 20.2, 22.5, 24.4, and 26.4%, respectively. When examining patients with more complete LN dissections (defined as removal of at least 10 LNs), the respective values were 6.6, 11.5, 17.6, 25.3, 26.8, 29.7, 30.7, and 31.6%. Moderately-poorly differentiated disease and adenocarcinomas were associated with a higher rate of pN + disease (p < .001 for both). For every cm increase in tumor size, the relative occult nodal risk increased by 10-14% (p < .001). For every elapsed day from initial diagnosis, the relative risk increased by ∼1% (p < .001). Graphs with best-fit lines were created based on tumor size, histology, and differentiation to aid physicians in estimating the pN + risk. CONCLUSIONS This nationwide study can allow clinicians to roughly estimate the rate of occult LN disease in cN0 NSCLC. These data can also assist in guiding enrollment on randomized trials of SABR ± immunotherapy, individualizing follow-up imaging surveillance, and patient counseling to avoid post-diagnosis delays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waqar Haque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anukriti Singh
- Department of Kinesiology, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Henry S. Park
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Bin S. Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - E. Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ming Zeng
- Cancer Center, Chengdu BOE Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Steven H. Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - James W. Welsh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joe Y. Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Olson RA, LaPointe V, Benny A, Chan M, Lefresne S, McKenzie M. Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Differences by Radiotherapy Techniques for Bone Metastases in A Population-Based Healthcare System. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:2073-80. [PMID: 35323367 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29030167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
We assessed whether advanced RT techniques were associated with differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Patients with bone metastases who completed the brief pain inventory (BPI) before and after RT were identified, and RT technique was categorized as simple (e.g., parallel opposed pair) or advanced (e.g., 3D-conformal RT (3DCRT), intensity-modulated RT (IMRT), or stereotactic ablative RT (SABR)). Pain response and patient-reported interference on quality of life secondary to pain was compared. A total of 1712 patients completed the BPI. From 2017−2021, the rate of advanced RT technique increased significantly (p < 0.001; 2.4%, 2.4%, 9.7%, 5.5%, 9.3%), with most advanced techniques consisting of IMRT, and only 7% of advanced techniques were SABR. Comparing simple vs. advanced technique, neither the complete pain response (12.3% vs. 11.4%; p = 0.99) nor the partial pain response (50.0% vs. 51.8%; p = 0.42) was significantly different. There was no significant patient-reported difference in pain interfering with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relationships, sleep, or enjoyment of life. Given that there is increasing utilization of advanced RT techniques, there is further need for randomized trials to assess their benefits given the increased cost and inconvenience to patients.
Collapse
|
38
|
Kowalchuk RO, Mullikin TC, Kim DK, Morris JM, Ebner DK, Harmsen WS, Merrell KW, Beriwal S, Waddle MR, Kim H. Cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for spinal metastases. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022:S1879-8500(22)00002-9. [PMID: 35045365 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We analyze the cost-effectiveness of standard palliative external beam radiation (EBRT, 8 Gy in 1 fraction), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT, 24 Gy in 2 fractions), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for painful spinal metastases. Single-fraction SBRT (delivering 24 Gy) is also assessed. METHODS AND MATERIALS A Markov state transition model was constructed. Key model parameters were derived from prospective clinical trial data. Strategies were compared using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), with effectiveness in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained. Costs included both hospital and professional costs using 2020 Medicare reimbursement. RESULTS The base case demonstrated that 2-fraction SBRT was not cost-effective compared to single-fraction EBRT, with an ICER of $194,145/QALY gained. RFA was a dominated treatment strategy (more costly and less effective) in this model. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that EBRT was favored in 66% of model iterations. If median survival were improved after SBRT, two-fraction SBRT became cost-effective, with ICER of $80,394, $57,062, and $47,038 for 3, 6, and 9-month improvements in survival. Because two-fraction SBRT data reported 18% of patients with indeterminant pain response at 3 months, and two-fraction SBRT is infrequently used in clinical practice, single-fraction SBRT data was also assessed. Single-fraction SBRT delivering 24 Gy was cost-effective compared to single-fraction EBRT, with an ICER of $92,833/QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS For appropriately chosen patients, single-fraction SBRT is more cost-effective than conventional EBRT or RFA. Conventional EBRT remains a cost-effective treatment for patients with poor expected survival.
Collapse
|
39
|
Chiang CL, Tsai PC, Yeh YC, Wu YH, Hsu HS, Chen YM. Recent Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Primary Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:242. [PMID: 35008406 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
With the wide application of computed tomography in lung cancer screening, the incidence of multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) has been increasingly reported. Despite the established criteria, the differentiation between MPLC and intrapulmonary metastasis remains challenging. Although histologic features are helpful in some circumstances, a molecular analysis is often needed. The application of next-generation sequencing could aid in distinguishing MPLCs from intrapulmonary metastasis, decreasing ambiguity. For MPLC management, surgery with lobectomy is the main operation method. Limited resection does not appear to negatively affect survival, and it is a reasonable alternative. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has become a standard of care for patients refusing surgery or for those with medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer. However, the efficacy of SABR in MPLC management could only be found in retrospective series. Other local ablation techniques are an emerging alternative for the control of residual lesions. Furthermore, systemic therapies, such as targeted therapy for oncogene-addicted patients, and immunotherapy have shown promising results in MPLC management after resection. In this paper, the recent advances in the diagnosis and management of MPLC are reviewed.
Collapse
|
40
|
Cereno RE, Bartlett Q, Lamey M, Hyde D, Mou B. Assessment of intrafraction motion for spine and non-spine bone metastases treated with image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy without 6 degrees-of-freedom couch correction. J Radiosurg SBRT 2022; 8:313-319. [PMID: 37416334 PMCID: PMC10322172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) planning target volume (PTV) margins are influenced by multiple factors. Data is limited on intrafraction motion in bone SBRT, particularly non-spine lesions. We analyzed intrafraction motion in bone SBRT patients treated on a standard treatment couch without 6 degrees-of-freedom (6-DOF) correction. Extracranial bone SBRT patients were included. Patients were treated using two volumetric-modulated arcs and targets were localized using daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) prior to each arc. Alignments between the first and second CBCT images yielded intrafraction positional shift values used to compute translational 3-dimensional vector shifts. 125 fractions from 43 patients were reviewed. Median vector shift for all SABR fractions was 0.7 mm (range 0-6.6 mm); spine 0.7 mm (range:0-2.3 mm) and non-spine 0.9 mm (range:0-6.6 mm). Of the 125 fractions, 95% had IFM vectors within the prescribed PTV margin. Intrafraction motion is small for bone SBRT patients treated on a standard couch without 6-DOF correction capabilities. Intrafraction motion was slightly larger for non-spine sites and may require treatment with larger PTV margins than spine cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reno Eufemon Cereno
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel St, 11th Floor, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V5Z 1M9
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Kelowna, 399 Royal Ave, Kelowna, BC, Canada, V1Y 5L3
| | - Quinn Bartlett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Kelowna, 399 Royal Ave, Kelowna, BC, Canada, V1Y 5L3
| | - Michael Lamey
- Department of Computer Science, Mathematics, Physics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia Okanagan, 3187 University Way, ASC 413, Kelowna, BC, Canada, V1V 1V7
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Kelowna, 399 Royal Ave, Kelowna, BC, Canada, V1Y 5L3
| | - Derek Hyde
- Department of Computer Science, Mathematics, Physics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia Okanagan, 3187 University Way, ASC 413, Kelowna, BC, Canada, V1V 1V7
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Kelowna, 399 Royal Ave, Kelowna, BC, Canada, V1Y 5L3
| | - Benjamin Mou
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel St, 11th Floor, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V5Z 1M9
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Kelowna, 399 Royal Ave, Kelowna, BC, Canada, V1Y 5L3
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Yamazaki H, Suzuki G, Aibe N, Masui K, Yoshida K, Nakamura S. Could high-dose-rate monotherapy survive beyond stereotactic ablative radiotherapy era for clinically localized prostate cancer? Radiother Oncol 2021; 167:97-98. [PMID: 34942282 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Revised: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hideya Yamazaki
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566 Japan.
| | - Gen Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566 Japan
| | - Norihiro Aibe
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566 Japan
| | - Koji Masui
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566 Japan
| | - Ken Yoshida
- Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata 573-1010, Japan
| | - Satoaki Nakamura
- Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata 573-1010, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Roberts HJ, Wo JY. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary liver tumors: An effective liver-directed therapy in the toolbox. Cancer 2021; 128:956-965. [PMID: 34847255 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The use of radiation for primary liver cancers has historically been limited because of the risk of radiation-induced liver disease. Treatment fields have become more conformal because of several technical advances, and this has allowed for dose escalation. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), also known as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, is now able to safely treat liver tumors to ablative doses while sparing functional liver parenchyma by using highly conformal therapy. Several retrospective and small prospective studies have examined the use of SBRT for liver cancers; however, there is a lack of well-powered randomized studies to definitively guide management in these settings. Recent advances in systemic therapy for primary liver cancers have improved outcomes; however, the optimal selection criteria for SBRT as a local therapy remain unclear among other liver-directed options such as radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, and radioembolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah J Roberts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Y Wo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Nicosia L, Franceschini D, Perrone-Congedi F, Casamassima F, Gerardi MA, Rigo M, Mazzola R, Perna M, Scotti V, Fodor A, Iurato A, Pasqualetti F, Gadducci G, Chiesa S, Niespolo RM, Bruni A, Alicino G, Frassinelli L, Borghetti P, Di Marzo A, Ravasio A, De Bari B, Sepulcri M, Aiello D, Mortellaro G, Sangalli C, Franceschini M, Montesi G, Aquilanti FM, Lunardi G, Valdagni R, Fazio I, Corti L, Vavassori V, Maranzano E, Magrini SM, Arcangeli S, Valentini V, Paiar F, Ramella S, Di Muzio NG, Livi L, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Osti MF, Scorsetti M, Alongi F. A multicenter LArge retrospectIve daTabase on the personalization of Stereotactic ABlative Radiotherapy use in lung metastases from colon-rectal cancer: the LaIT-SABR study. Radiother Oncol 2021; 166:92-99. [PMID: 34748855 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has been shown to increase survival in oligometastatic disease, but local control of colorectal metastases remains poor. We aimed to identify potential predictive factors of SBRT response through a multicenter large retrospective database and to investigate the progression to the polymetastatic disease (PMD). MATERIAL AND METHODS the study involved 23 centers, and was approved by the Ethical Committee (Prot. Negrar 2019-ZT). 1033 lung metastases were reported. Clinical and biological parameters were evaluated as predictive for local progression-free survival (FLP). Secondary end-point was the time to the polymetastatic conversion (tPMC). RESULTS Two-year FLP was 75.4%. Two-year FLP for lesions treated with a BED <100 Gy, 100-124 Gy, and ≥125 Gy was 76.1%, 70.6%, and 94% (p=0.000). Two-year FLP for lesion measuring ≤10 mm, 10-20 mm, and >20 mm was 79.7%, 77.1%, and 66.6% (p=0.027). At the multivariate analysis a BED ≥125 Gy significantly reduced the risk of local progression (HR 0.24, 95%CI 0.11-0.51; p=0.000). Median tPMC was 26.8 months. Lesions treated with BED ≥125 Gy reported a significantly longer tPMC as compared to lower BED. The median tPMC for patients treated to 1, 2-3 or 4-5 simultaneous oligometastases was 28.5, 25.4, and 9.8 months (p=0.035). CONCLUSION The present is the largest series of lung colorectal metastases treated with SABR. The results support the use of SBRT in lung oligometastatic colorectal cancer patients as it might delay the transition to PMD or offer relatively long disease-free period in selected cases. Predictive factors were identified for treatment personalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center.
| | - D Franceschini
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - F Perrone-Congedi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, "Sapienza" University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | | | - M A Gerardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - M Rigo
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center
| | - R Mazzola
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center
| | - M Perna
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - V Scotti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - A Fodor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - A Iurato
- Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Via A. del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - F Pasqualetti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy
| | - G Gadducci
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy
| | - S Chiesa
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - R M Niespolo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Gerardo, Monza, Italy
| | - A Bruni
- Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - G Alicino
- Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - L Frassinelli
- Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - P Borghetti
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia - Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - A Di Marzo
- Radiation Oncology Centre, S. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - A Ravasio
- Radiotherapy Unit, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo
| | - B De Bari
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France; Radiation Oncology Department, Neuchâtel Hospital Network, la Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland
| | - M Sepulcri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - D Aiello
- Radiotherapy Unit, Casa di Cura Macchiarella, Palermo, Italy
| | - G Mortellaro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Ospedale Civico, Palermo, Italy
| | - C Sangalli
- Department of Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - M Franceschini
- Department of Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - G Montesi
- Radiotherapy Unit ULSS5, Rovigo, Italy
| | - F M Aquilanti
- Radiotherapy Marrelli Hospital, Marrelli Hospital, Crotone, Italy
| | - G Lunardi
- Medical Analysis Laboratory, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital
| | - R Valdagni
- Department of Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haematology-Oncology, University of Milan
| | - I Fazio
- Radiotherapy Unit, Casa di Cura Macchiarella, Palermo, Italy
| | - L Corti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - V Vavassori
- Radiotherapy Unit, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo
| | - E Maranzano
- Radiation Oncology Centre, S. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - S M Magrini
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia - Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - S Arcangeli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Gerardo, Monza, Italy
| | - V Valentini
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - F Paiar
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy
| | - S Ramella
- Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Via A. del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - N G Di Muzio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - L Livi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - B A Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - M F Osti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, "Sapienza" University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - M Scorsetti
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - F Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center; University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kim J, Han MC, Chang JS, Hong CS, Kim KH, Byun HK, Park RH, Koom WS, Park SY, Kim JS. Development of a Margin Determination Framework for Tumor-Tracking Radiation Therapy With Intraoperatively Implanted Fiducial Markers. Front Oncol 2021; 11:753246. [PMID: 34692536 PMCID: PMC8529155 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.753246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop an internal target volume (ITV) margin determination framework (or decision-supporting framework) for treating multiple lung metastases using CyberKnife Synchrony with intraoperatively implanted fiducial markers (IIFMs). The feasibility of using non-ideally implanted fiducial markers (a limited number and/or far from a target) for tracking-based lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) was investigated. METHODS In the developed margin determination framework, an optimal set of IIFMs was determined to minimize a tracking uncertainty-specific ITV (ITVtracking) margin (margin required to cover target-to-marker motion discrepancy), i.e., minimize the motion discrepancies between gross tumor volume (GTV) and the selected set of fiducial markers (FMs). The developed margin determination framework was evaluated in 17 patients with lung metastases. To automatically calculate the respiratory motions of the FMs, a template matching-based FM tracking algorithm was developed, and GTV motion was manually measured. Furthermore, during-treatment motions of the selected FMs were analyzed using log files and compared with those calculated using 4D CTs. RESULTS For 41 of 42 lesions in 17 patients (97.6%), an optimal set of the IIFMs was successfully determined, requiring an ITVtracking margin less than 5 mm. The template matching-based FM tracking algorithm calculated the FM motions with a sub-millimeter accuracy compared with the manual measurements. The patient respiratory motions during treatment were, on average, significantly smaller than those measured at simulation for the patient cohort considered. CONCLUSION Use of the developed margin determination framework employing CyberKnife Synchrony with a limited number of IIFMs is feasible for lung SABR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihun Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Min Cheol Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jee Suk Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chae-Seon Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hwa Kyung Byun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ryeong Hwang Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Woong Sub Koom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seong Yong Park
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin Sung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Yoon SM, Luterstein E, Chu FI, Cao M, Lamb J, Agazaryan N, Low D, Raldow A, Steinberg ML, Lee P. Clinical outcomes of stereotactic magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive radiotherapy for primary and metastatic tumors in the abdomen and pelvis. Cancer Med 2021; 10:5897-5906. [PMID: 34288538 PMCID: PMC8419771 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivers ablative doses with excellent local control. However, implementing SBRT for abdominal and pelvic tumors has been limited by the risk for treatment‐related gastrointestinal toxicity. MRI‐guided radiotherapy may ameliorate these risks and increase the therapeutic ratio. We report the clinical outcomes of stereotactic MRI‐guided adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) for primary and metastatic tumors in the abdomen and pelvis. Methods From November 2014 to August 2017, the first 106 consecutive patients with 121 tumors in the abdomen and pelvis were treated with SMART at a single institution. Of the cohort, 41.5%, 15.1%, and 43.4% had primary, locally recurrent, and oligometastatic tumors, respectively. SMART was delivered using a tri‐cobalt‐60 gantry with on‐board 0.35 Tesla MRI with respiratory breath‐hold and daily adaptive re‐planning when anatomically necessary. A median of 40Gy in five fractions was prescribed. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4.03 was used to score treatment‐related toxicities. Local control (LC), progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan–Meier method. Results Of the 510 treatments, seventy‐one (13.9%) were adapted. Fatigue, nausea, and pain were the most common acute toxicities. 0.9 and 0% of patients experienced acute grade three and four toxicities, respectively. 5.2 and 2.1% of patients experienced late grade three and four toxicities, respectively. After a median follow‐up of 20.4 months, the 2‐year LC rate was 74% on a per‐lesion basis. Two‐year LC was 96% for lesions that were treated with BED10≥100 versus 69% for BED10<100 (p = 0.02). PFS was significantly different between patients with and without locally controlled tumors (2‐year PFS 21 vs. 8%, p = 0.03). Two‐year OS was 57% for the entire cohort. Conclusions Favorable LC and PFS outcomes were observed with minimal morbidity for tumors in the abdomen and pelvis treated with SMART. Future prospective clinical trials to validate these findings are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elaine Luterstein
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Fang-I Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - James Lamb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nzhde Agazaryan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ann Raldow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Mathew AS, Dawson LA. Current Understanding of Ablative Radiation Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2021; 8:575-586. [PMID: 34164350 PMCID: PMC8214025 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s284403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of ablative stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been evolving over the last few decades. SBRT has mostly been used in early stages of HCC, including few (≤ 3 in number) tumors, small tumours (< 3 cm in size), as well as larger tumours which are ineligible for other ablative modalities, mostly without vascular invasion. In early stage HCC, SBRT is used as a definitive treatment with curative intent or with intent to bridge to liver transplant. Retrospective and prospective institutional series document a high rate of local control (68–95% at 3 years) following SBRT. This coupled with a low risk of toxicity makes this non-invasive ablative treatment an attractive option for patients who are ineligible for other ablative treatments. Small randomized studies of ablative radiation have also shown non-inferiority of radiation as compared to radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Currently, SBRT is widely available as a safe and effective liver directed therapy, although there is a need for more studies providing higher level evidence. This review gives a brief overview of SBRT and the evidence for its use in HCC patients with ablative intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwathy S Mathew
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Laura A Dawson
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Okada W, Doi H, Tanooka M, Sano K, Nakamura K, Sakai Y, Shibata M, Tanaka M. A first report of tumour-tracking radiotherapy with helical tomotherapy for lung and liver tumours: A double case report. SAGE Open Med Case Rep 2021; 9:2050313X211023688. [PMID: 34178347 PMCID: PMC8202334 DOI: 10.1177/2050313x211023688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
There are only a limited number of previous reports on clinical cases using tumour tracking with tomotherapy. Therefore, we present two cases of patients treated with tumour tracking with tomotherapy. First, a 74-year-old man with an inoperable lung cancer type T1bN0M0 underwent stereotactic body radiotherapy at a total dose of 48 Gy in four fractions. Second, a 68-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma with a portal venous tumour thrombosis and history of liver stereotactic body radiotherapy with fiducial marker implantation received radiotherapy at a total dose of 48 Gy in 20 fractions. The results of patient-specific quality assurance and tracking radiotherapy were sufficient to irradiate tumours. Tumour tracking with tomotherapy successfully delivered radiation in a total of 24 treatment fractions in both patients. Tumour tracking with tomotherapy is feasible in lung and liver cancer treatment. This study's findings suggest the clinical use of tumour tracking with tomotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wataru Okada
- Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Doi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masao Tanooka
- Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, Japan
| | - Keisuke Sano
- Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, Japan
| | - Kenji Nakamura
- Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, Japan
| | - Yusuke Sakai
- Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, Japan
| | - Mayuri Shibata
- Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, Japan
| | - Masahiro Tanaka
- Department of Radiotherapy, Takarazuka City Hospital, Takarazuka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Fukuda S, Okajima K, Okada K, Fukuda K, Wakasa T, Tsujimoto T, Gakuhara A, Tomihara H, Ohta K, Kitani K, Hashimoto K, Ishikawa H, Hida JI, Yukawa M, Ohta Y, Inoue M. Postoperative solitary liver metastasis from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma achieving a clinical complete response to chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil followed by stereotactic body radiotherapy: A case report. Mol Clin Oncol 2021; 15:130. [PMID: 34055345 PMCID: PMC8138851 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2021.2292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment strategies for distant organ metastasis have changed markedly since the concept of oligometastasis was introduced. The perception that distant organ metastasis is a systemic disease and not eligible for local therapy is now a thing of the past. Therefore, the present report details a case of postoperative solitary liver metastasis from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), which achieved a clinical complete response to chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) followed by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). A 76-year-old male patient underwent esophagectomy for lower thoracic ESCC. At 7 months after surgery, abdominal CT revealed a solitary hypovascular mass, 28 mm in size, in segment 7 of the liver. After three courses of chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-FU, abdominal CT revealed that the liver mass had shrunk to 7 mm in size. SBRT was then administered with a 6 MV X-ray beam generated by a linear accelerator. A total dose of 50 Gy was given in 5 fractions of 10 Gy to the liver mass. At 1 month after SBRT, abdominal CT revealed that the liver mass had disappeared. The patient received no further adjuvant chemotherapy and had no recurrence at 18 months after diagnosis of liver metastasis and 13 months after SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuichi Fukuda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan
| | - Kaoru Okajima
- Department of Radiology, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan
| | - Kaoru Okada
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan
| | - Kohei Fukuda
- Department of Radiology, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan
| | - Tomoko Wakasa
- Department of Pathology, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Tsujimoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan
| | - Atsushi Gakuhara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan
| | - Hideo Tomihara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan
| | - Katsuya Ohta
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan
| | - Kotaro Kitani
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Hashimoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan
| | - Hajime Ishikawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan
| | - Jin-Ichi Hida
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan
| | - Masao Yukawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan
| | - Yoshio Ohta
- Department of Pathology, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Inoue
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Modesto A, Siegfried A, Lusque A, Vergez S, Sarini J, Brouchet L, Uro-Coste E, Graff-Cailleaud P, Delord JP. Distinct Outcomes of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients after Distant Failure According to p16 Status: Implication in Therapeutic Options. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:1673-80. [PMID: 33947015 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28030156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Recent modifications in the epidemiology of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) have led to the increase of Human papillomavirus (HPV) related metastatic head and neck cancer patients with high life expectancy even at advanced stage, low comorbidity and still restricted systemic therapy opportunities. In the recent era of ablative therapies’ development, oligometastatic HPV OSCC patients are indubitably good candidates for intensified treatment. However, data related to outcomes after optimised management of metastatic sites are dramatically missing. Materials and patients: In our cohort of 186 unselected consecutive OSCC patients treated with curative intent at our institution between 2009 and 2013, we analysed the incidence, treatment and outcomes of distant metastatic (DM) failure according to p16 status. Results: After a median follow-up of 4.2 years (95% CI: 3.8–4.4) from primary diagnosis of OSCC, 21/95 p16− patients (22.1%) vs. 8/91 (8.8%) p16+ patients presented DM failure with a median interval of 11 (range 0–46) and 28 months (range 0–71), respectively (p = 0.10). Overall survival (OS) after DM failure was significantly higher in p16+ patients with a two-year OS rate of 75% and 15% for p16+ and p16−, respectively (p = 0.002). In eight HPV-related metastatic patients, three underwent ablative lung metastasis treatment and are still complete responders four to five years later. Conclusion: This study highlights distinct outcomes of metastatic HPV-related OSCC patients emphasised by three long-term complete responders after lung ablative treatment. In patients with high life expectancy and limited tumour burden, the question of ablative treatment such as metastasectomy or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SBRT) should be addressed.
Collapse
|
50
|
Liu HYH, Lee YYD, Sridharan S, Choong ES, Le H, Wang W, Khor R, Chu J, Oar A, Mott R, Smart J, Jenkins T, Anderson N, Cross S, Loo KF, Wigg A, Stuart K, Pryor D. Stereotactic body radiotherapy in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: An Australian multi-institutional patterns of practice review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021; 65:365-373. [PMID: 33890425 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging, therapeutic option in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A multicentre Liver Ablative Stereotactic Radiation (LASR) database was established to provide a collaborative platform for Australian institutions to define the practice of liver SBRT for HCC. This study explores the patterns of SBRT practice amongst Australian institutions. METHODS This was a multi-institutional retrospective study of patients treated with SBRT for HCC at 10 institutions between January 2013 and December 2019. Patients' demographics, disease characteristics and SBRT details were evaluated. RESULTS Three hundred and seventeen patients were evaluated with a median age of 67 years (range, 32-90). Liver cirrhosis was present in 88.6%, baseline Child-Pugh score was A5/6 in 85.1% and B7/8 in 13.2%. Median size of HCC treated was 30 mm (range, 10-280). 63.1% had early-stage disease (Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage 0/A) and 36% had intermediate/advanced-stage disease (BCLC B/C). In 2013/2014, six courses of SBRT were delivered, increasing to 108 in 2019. SBRT was prescribed in five fractions for 71.3% of the cohort. The most common dose fractionation schedule was 40 Gy in five fractions (24.3%). Median biologically effective dose (BED10 ) delivered was 85.5 Gy for early-stage and 60 Gy for intermediate/advanced disease, respectively. The most common prescription range was 100-120 Gy BED10 (32.8%). CONCLUSION SBRT utilisation for HCC is increasing in Australia. There was wide variation in size of tumours and disease stages treated, and prescription patterns. Uniform reporting of clinical and dosimetric details are important in refining the role of liver SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard Yu-Hao Liu
- Department of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Yoo-Young Dominique Lee
- Department of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Swetha Sridharan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ee Siang Choong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Nepean Cancer Care Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard Khor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Julie Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Oar
- Icon Cancer Centre, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rebekah Mott
- Department of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Joanne Smart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Trish Jenkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nigel Anderson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shamira Cross
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Nepean Cancer Care Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kee Fong Loo
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Medicine Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Alan Wigg
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Medicine Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Katherine Stuart
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - David Pryor
- Department of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Icon Cancer Centre, Greenslopes Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|