Quantifying the rate and predictors of occult lymph node involvement in patients with clinically node-negative non-small cell lung cancer

Occult lymph node metastasis is not a favorable factor for resected NSCLC patients

BACKGROUND

This study was to compare the clinical presentations and survivals between the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with occult lymph node metastasis (OLNM) and those with evident lymph node metastasis (ELNM). We also intended to analyze the predictive factors for OLNM.

METHODS

Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was used to compare survivals between groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce bias. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-penalized Cox multivariable analysis was used to identify the prognostic factors. Random forest was used to determine the predictive factors for OLNM.

RESULTS

A total of 2,067 eligible cases (N0: 1,497 cases; occult N1: 165 cases; evident N1: 54 cases; occult N2: 243 cases; evident N2: 108 cases) were included. The rate of OLNM was 21.4%. Patients with OLNM were tend to be female, non-smoker, adenocarcinoma and had smaller-sized tumors when compared with the patients with ELNM. Survival curves showed that the survivals of the patients with OLNM were similar to those of the patients with ELNM both before and after PSM. Multivariable Cox analysis suggested that positive lymph nodes (PLN) was the only prognostic factor for the patients with OLNM. Random forest showed that clinical tumor size was an important predictive factor for OLNM.

CONCLUSIONS

OLNM was not rare. OLNM was not a favorable sign for resected NSCLC patients with lymph node metastasis. PLN determined the survivals of the patients with OLNM. Clinical tumor size was a strong predictive factor for OLNM.

Functional status and spatial architecture of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells are associated with lymph node metastases in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy has been recommended for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with lymph node metastases (LNM). However, the exact functional feature and spatial architecture of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cells remain unclear in these patients.

METHODS

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) from 279 IA-IIIB NSCLC samples were stained by multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) for 11 markers (CD8, CD103, PD-1, Tim3, GZMB, CD4, Foxp3, CD31, αSMA, Hif-1α, pan-CK). We evaluated the density of CD8 + T-cell functional subsets, the mean nearest neighbor distance (mNND) between CD8 + T cells and neighboring cells, and the cancer-cell proximity score (CCPS) in invasive margin (IM) as well as tumor center (TC) to investigate their relationships with LNM and prognosis.

RESULTS

The densities of CD8 + T-cell functional subsets, including predysfunctional CD8 + T cells (T_predys) and dysfunctional CD8 + T cells (T_dys), in IM predominated over those in TC (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified that the densities of CD8 + T_predys cells in TC and CD8 + T_dys cells in IM were significantly associated with LNM [OR = 0.51, 95%CI (0.29-0.88), P = 0.015; OR = 5.80, 95%CI (3.19-10.54), P < 0.001; respectively] and recurrence-free survival (RFS) [HR = 0.55, 95%CI (0.34-0.89), P = 0.014; HR = 2.49, 95%CI (1.60-4.13), P = 0.012; respectively], independent of clinicopathological factors. Additionally, shorter mNND between CD8 + T cells and their neighboring immunoregulatory cells indicated a stronger interplay network in the microenvironment of NSCLC patients with LNM and was associated with worse prognosis. Furthermore, analysis of CCPS suggested that cancer microvessels (CMVs) and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) selectively hindered CD8 + T cells from contacting with cancer cells, and were associated with the dysfunction of CD8 + T cells.

CONCLUSION

Tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cells were in a more dysfunctional status and in a more immunosuppressive microenvironment in patients with LNM compared with those without LNM.

Surgery versus radiotherapy in octogenarians with stage Ia non‑small cell lung cancer: propensity score matching analysis of the SEER database

Objectives

To compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) outcomes of surgery with radiotherapy in octogenarians with stage Ia non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Materials and methods

Patients aged ≥ 80 years with clinical stage Ia (T1N0M0) NSCLC between 2012 and 2017 were identified from the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were assigned into surgery and radiotherapy groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify survival-associated factors. Treatment groups were adjusted by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis while OS and CSS outcomes were compared among groups by Kaplan–Meier analysis.

Results

A total of 1641 patients were identified, with 46.0% in the surgical group and 54.0% in the radiotherapy group. Compared to surgery, radiotherapy-treated patients were older, later diagnosed, had more often unmarried, more squamous cell carcinoma, more unknown grade and increased tumor sizes. Radiotherapy was associated with a significantly worse OS, compared to surgery (hazard ratio 2.426; 95% CI 2.003–2.939; P < .001). After PSM, OS (P < 0.001) and CSS (P < 0.001) were higher in the surgery group. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates of surgical and radiotherapy group were 90.0%, 76.9%, 59.9%, and 86.0%, 54.3%, 28.0%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS rates of surgical and radiotherapy group were 94.5%, 86.1%, 78.0% and 90.7%, 74.5%, 61.0%, respectively. There were no survival differences between the matched surgery without lymph node examination (LNE) and radiotherapy group, as well as between the matched surgery and radiotherapy who were recommended but refused surgery group.

Conclusions

In octogenarians with stage Ia NSCLC, surgery with lymph node dissection offers better OS and CSS outcomes than radiotherapy.

Rationale for Combing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Medically Inoperable Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

The rate of recurrence remains high for lymph node negative early-stage non-small cell lung cancer that are over 2–3 cm in size following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). This is due to the increased incidence of out-of-field failures, which warrants the addition of systemic therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a class of immunotherapy, may induce a strong distant therapeutic effect known as the “abscopal” effect. This makes them a very suitable class of drugs to be combined with SBRT when treating early lung cancer with high-risk features, such as larger tumor size. In this review, we discuss the rationale and evidence for doing so.

Abstract

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been widely adopted as an alternative to lobar resection in medically inoperable patients with lymph-node negative (N0) early-stage (ES) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Excellent in-field local control has been consistently achieved with SBRT in ES NSCLC ≤ 3 cm in size. However, the out-of-field control following SBRT remains suboptimal. The rate of recurrence, especially distant recurrence remains high for larger tumors. Additional systemic therapy is warranted in N0 ES NSCLC that is larger in size. Radiation has been shown to have immunomodulatory effects on cancer, which is most prominent with higher fractional doses. Strong synergistic effects are observed when immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are combined with radiation doses in SBRT’s dose range. Unlike chemotherapy, ICIs can potentiate a strong systemic response outside of the irradiated field when combined with SBRT. Together with their less toxic nature, ICIs represent a very suitable class of systemic agents to be combined with SBRT when treating ES NSCLC with high-risk features, such as larger tumor size. In this review, we describe the rationale and emerging evidence, as well as ongoing investigations in this area.