Sarcopenia as a Predictor of Feeding Tube Placement in Individuals with Oropharyngeal Cancer

Purpose

In oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), systemic loss of skeletal muscle mass (SMM), or sarcopenia, is a strong prognostic predictor of survival outcomes. However, the relationship between sarcopenia and nutrition-related outcomes is not well understood. This investigation evaluated the prognostic significance of sarcopenia for feeding tube (FT) placement in a cohort of OPSCC patients.

Methods and Materials

A retrospective cohort study was conducted with data collected from 194 OPSCC patients treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT) or chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Sarcopenia was assessed from computed tomography imaging at the level of the third cervical (C3) and fourth thoracic (T4) vertebrae. The prognostic nature of pretreatment sarcopenia and its relationship with FT placement was explored using logistic regression.

Results

The median age of patients included was 61.0 years, and the majority were male (83%). In this patient cohort, 87.6% underwent concurrent CRT, and 30.9% received a FT over the course of treatment. Sarcopenia was identified at baseline in 72.7% of patients based on C3 SMM measurements and in 41.7% based on measures at the level of T4. Based on measures at both C3 and T4, those with sarcopenia were significantly more likely to receive a FT and had significantly worse freedom from FT placement compared with patients without sarcopenia. Sarcopenia assessed at T4 was a significant predictor of FT placement.

Conclusions

SMM measured at T4 may represent a novel and practical biomarker for sarcopenia detection that is associated with the need for FT placement. These findings suggest that the detection of baseline sarcopenia could guide decision-making related to the need for nutritional support in OPSCC patients undergoing RT/CRT.

Delphi consensus on stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive renal cell carcinoma-a European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology study endorsed by the European Association of Urology

The purpose of this European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) project, endorsed by the European Association of Urology, is to explore expert opinion on the management of patients with oligometastatic and oligoprogressive renal cell carcinoma by means of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) on extracranial metastases, with the aim of developing consensus recommendations for patient selection, treatment doses, and concurrent systemic therapy. A questionnaire on SABR in oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma was prepared by a core group and reviewed by a panel of ten prominent experts in the field. The Delphi consensus methodology was applied, sending three rounds of questionnaires to clinicians identified as key opinion leaders in the field. At the end of the third round, participants were able to find consensus on eight of the 37 questions. Specifically, panellists agreed to apply no restrictions regarding age (25 [100%) of 25) and primary renal cell carcinoma histology (23 [92%] of 25) for SABR candidates, on the upper threshold of three lesions to offer ablative treatment in patients with oligoprogression, and on the concomitant administration of immune checkpoint inhibitor. SABR was indicated as the treatment modality of choice for renal cell carcinoma bone oligometatasis (20 [80%] of 25) and for adrenal oligometastases 22 (88%). No consensus or major agreement was reached regarding the appropriate schedule, but the majority of the poll (54%-58%) retained the every-other-day schedule as the optimal choice for all the investigated sites. The current ESTRO Delphi consensus might provide useful direction for the application of SABR in oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma and highlight the key areas of ongoing debate, perhaps directing future research efforts to close knowledge gaps.

Diagnostic CT-Enabled Planning (DART): Results of a Randomized Trial in Palliative Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Using diagnostic computed tomography (dCT) scans instead of CT simulation (CTsim) scans can increase departmental efficiency and reduce patient burden. The goal of the DART trial was to assess the efficacy and acceptability of dCT-based planning workflows with a focus on patient experiences, plan deliverability and adequacy of target coverage, and workflows.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients undergoing same-day CTsim and treatment for palliative radiation therapy to thoracic, abdominopelvic, or proximal limb targets with a recent dCT (within 28 days) in a reproducible position were eligible. After stratifying by target type (bone or soft tissue vs. visceral), participants were randomized (1:2 ratio) between CTsim-based (CTsim arm) vs. dCT-based planning (dCT arm). The primary endpoint was time in center (TIC), defined as total time spent in the cancer center on first day of treatment, from first radiation department appointment to first fraction completion. Secondary endpoints included plan deliverability, adequacy of target coverage, and stakeholder acceptability.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients (42 treatment sites) were enrolled between June 2022 and April 2023. The median age was 72 (interquartile range [IQR]: 67-78), 73% were male, and the most common primary cancers were lung (33%), prostate (24%), and breast (12%). The most common dose and fractionations were 8 Gy in 1 and 20 Gy in 5 fractions (50% and 43% of plans, respectively). TIC was 4.7 ± 1.1 hours (mean ± SD) in the CTsim arm vs. 0.41 ± 0.14 hours in the dCT arm (P < .001). All dCT plans were deliverable. All plans in both arms were rated as "acceptable" (80% CTsim; 81% dCT) or "acceptable with minor deviation" (20% CTsim; 19% dCT). Patient perception of acceptability was similar in both arms with the exception of time burden, which was rated as "acceptable" by 50% in the CTsim arm vs. 90% in the dCT arm (P = .025).

CONCLUSION

dCT-based radiation planning substantially reduced TIC without detriment in plan deliverability or quality and had a tangible impact on patient experience with reduced patient-reported time burden.

Stereotactic Radiation for Ultra-Central Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Safety and Efficacy Trial (SUNSET)

INTRODUCTION

The use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for tumors in close proximity to the central mediastinal structures has been associated with a high risk of toxicity. This study (BLINDED FOR REVIEW) aimed to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of SBRT for ultra-central (UC) non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), using a time-to-event continual reassessment methodology (TITE-CRM).

METHODS

Patients with T1-3N0M0 (≤ 6 cm) NSCLC were eligible. The MTD was defined as the dose of radiotherapy associated with a ≤ 30% rate of grade (G) 3-5 pre-specified treatment-related toxicity occurring within 2 years of treatment. The starting dose level was 60 Gy in 8 daily fractions. The dose-maximum hotspot was limited to 120% and within the planning tumor volume (PTV); tumors with endobronchial invasion were excluded. This primary analysis occurred two years after completion of accrual.

RESULTS

Between March 2018 and April 2021, 30 patients were enrolled at 5 institutions. The median age was 73 years (range: 65-87) and 17 (57%) were female. PTV was abutting proximal bronchial tree in 19 (63%), esophagus 5 (17%), pulmonary vein 1 (3.3%) and pulmonary artery 14 (47%). All patients received 60 Gy in 8 fractions. The median follow-up was 37 months (range: 8.9-51). Two patients (6.7%) experienced G3-5 adverse events related to treatment: 1 patient with G3 dyspnea and 1 G5 pneumonia; the latter had CT findings consistent with a background of interstitial lung disease. Three-year overall survival was 72.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52.3-85.3%), progression-free survival 66.1% (95% CI: 46.1-80.2%), local control 89.6% (95% CI: 71.2-96.5%), regional control 96.4% (95% CI: 77.2-99.5%) and distant control 85.9% (95% CI: 66.7-94.5%). Quality of life scores declined numerically over time, but the decreases were not clinically or statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

60 Gy in 8 fractions, planned and delivered with only a moderate hotspot, has a favorable adverse event rate within the pre-specified acceptability criteria, and results in excellent control for UC tumors.

An Updated Review of Management of Resectable Stage III NSCLC in the Era of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have an established role in the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ICIs have now entered the paradigm of early-stage NSCLC. The recent evidence shows that the addition of ICI to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and survival rate in early-stage resectable NSCLC and is now a standard of care option in this setting. In this regard, stage III NSCLC merits special consideration, as it is heterogenous and requires a multidisciplinary approach to management. As the neoadjuvant approach is being adopted widely, new challenges have emerged and the boundaries for resectability are being re-examined. Consequently, it is ever more important to carefully individualize the treatment strategy for each patient with resectable stage III NSCLC. In this review, we discuss the recent literature in this field with particular focus on evolving definitions of resectability, T4 disease, N2 disease (single and multi-station), and nodal downstaging. We also highlight the controversy around adjuvant treatment in this setting and discuss the selection of patients for adjuvant treatment, options of salvage, and next line treatment in cases of progression on/after neoadjuvant treatment or after R2 resection. We will conclude with a brief discussion of predictive biomarkers, predictive models, ongoing studies, and directions for future research in this space.

The genomic and evolutionary landscapes of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma is arguably the most lethal human malignancy. It often co-occurs with differentiated thyroid cancers, yet the molecular origins of its aggressivity are unknown. We sequenced tumor DNA from 329 regions of thyroid cancer, including 213 from patients with primary anaplastic thyroid carcinomas. We also whole genome sequenced 9 patients using multi-region sequencing of both differentiated and anaplastic thyroid cancer components. Using these data, we demonstrate thatanaplastic thyroid carcinomas have a higher burden of mutations than other thyroid cancers, with distinct mutational signatures and molecular subtypes. Further, different cancer driver genes are mutated in anaplastic and differentiated thyroid carcinomas, even those arising in a single patient. Finally, we unambiguously demonstrate that anaplastic thyroid carcinomas share a genomic origin with co-occurring differentiated carcinomas and emerge from a common malignant field through acquisition of characteristic clonal driver mutations.

Stereotactic Radiation Therapy in Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Interstitial Lung Disease: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been reported to be at high risk of toxic effects after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), but for many patients, there are limited alternative treatment options.

Objective

To prospectively assess the benefits and toxic effects of SABR in this patient population.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective cohort study was conducted at 6 academic radiation oncology institutions, 5 in Canada and 1 in Scotland, with accrual between March 7, 2019, and January 12, 2022. Patients aged 18 years or older with fibrotic ILD and a diagnosis of T1-2N0 NSCLC who were not candidates for surgical resection were enrolled.

Intervention

Patients were treated with SABR to a dose of 50 Gy in 5 fractions every other day.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The study prespecified that SABR would be considered worthwhile if median overall survival-the primary end point-was longer than 1 year, with a grade 3 to 4 risk of toxic effects less than 35% and a grade 5 risk of toxic effects less than 15%. Secondary end points included toxic effects, progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), quality-of-life outcomes, and changes in pulmonary function. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted.

Results

Thirty-nine patients enrolled and received SABR. Median age was 78 (IQR, 67-83) years and 59% (n = 23) were male. At baseline, 70% (26 of 37) of patients reported dyspnea, median forced expiratory volume in first second of expiration was 80% (IQR, 66%-90%) predicted, median forced vital capacity was 84% (IQR, 69%-94%) predicted, and median diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was 49% (IQR, 38%-61%) predicted. Median follow-up was 19 (IQR, 14-25) months. Overall survival at 1 year was 79% (95%, CI 62%-89%; P < .001 vs the unacceptable rate), and median overall survival was 25 months (95% CI, 14 months to not reached). Median PFS was 19 months (95% CI, 13-28 months), and 2-year LC was 92% (95% CI, 69%-98%). Adverse event rates (highest grade per patient) were grade 1 to 2: n = 12 (31%), grade 3: n = 4 (10%), grade 4: n = 0, and grade 5: n = 3 (7.7%, all due to respiratory deterioration).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this trial, use of SABR in patients with fibrotic ILD met the prespecified acceptability thresholds for both toxicity and efficacy, supporting the use of SABR for curative-intent treatment after a careful discussion of risks and benefits.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03485378.

Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA After Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in Patients With Unbiopsied Lung Tumors (SABR-DETECT)

For patients with stage I/IIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), surgical resection is the standard treatment. However, some of these patients are not candidates for surgery or refuse a surgical option. Definitive stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a standard approach in these patients. Approximately 15% of patients undergoing SABR for localized NSCLC will experience a recurrence within 2 years. Furthermore, many of these patients are deemed appropriate for SABR without a tissue diagnosis, based on the likelihood of malignancy which can be calculated by validated models. A liquid biopsy, detecting ctDNA, would be useful in early detection of recurrences, and documenting a cancer diagnosis in patients without a biopsy. This is a multi-institutional study enrolling patients with suspected stage I/IIA NSCLC and a pretreatment likelihood of malignancy of ≥60% using the validated models for patients without a tissue diagnosis, in cohort 1 (n = 45). The second cohort will consist of biopsied patients (n = 30-60). SABR will be delivered as per risk-adapted protocol. Plasma will be collected for ctDNA analysis prior to the first fraction of SABR, 24 to 72 hours after first fraction, and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24-months. The patients will be followed up with imaging at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24-months. The primary objective is to assess whether a cancer detection liquid biopsy platform can predict recurrence of NSCLC. The secondary objectives are to assess the impact of SABR on detection rates of ctDNA in patients undergoing SABR and to correlate ctDNA positivity and pretreatment probability of malignancy (NCT05921474).

A comparison of timing and patterns of treatment failure, and survival outcomes after progression between HPV+ and HPV- patients undergoing chemoradiation for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas

BACKGROUND

We aimed to analyze and compare the timing and patterns of treatment failure, and survival after progression between HPV-positive (HPV+) and HPV-negative (HPV-) patients undergoing chemoradiation for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC).

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing primary chemoradiation for OPSCC between 2008 and 2021. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival (OS), and time to recurrence/metastases (TTR) were compared using the log-rank test, with Cox regression used for multivariable modeling comparing HPV+ and HPV- patients.

RESULTS

HPV- patients developed recurrence or metastases at earlier time points than HPV+ patients (8.8 vs. 15.2 months, p < 0.05), due to earlier local/locoregional recurrence and distant metastases, but not isolated regional recurrences. HPV- distant metastases exclusively occurred in a single organ, most commonly the lungs or bone, while HPV+ metastases frequently had multi-organ involvement in a wide variety of locations (p < 0.05). Once progression (recurrence/metastases) was diagnosed, HPV+ patients experienced superior survival to HPV- patients on univariate and multivariate analysis, largely due to improved outcomes after treatment of local/locoregional recurrences (p < 0.05). There were no differences in survival after isolated regional recurrences or distant metastases.

CONCLUSION

HPV+ OPSCC patients relapse later compared to HPV- patients in local/locoregional and distant sites. HPV+ patients with local/locoregional recurrence experience superior survival after recurrence, which does not hold true for isolated regional recurrences or distant metastases. These data can be useful to inform prognosis and guide treatment decisions in patients with recurrent OPSCC.

Distinguishing recurrence from radiation-induced lung injury at the time of RECIST progressive disease on post-SABR CT scans using radiomics

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a highly effective treatment for patients with early-stage lung cancer who are inoperable. However, SABR causes benign radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) which appears as lesion growth on follow-up CT scans. This triggers the standard definition of progressive disease, yet cancer recurrence is not usually present, and distinguishing RILI from recurrence when a lesion appears to grow in size is critical but challenging. In this study, we developed a tool to do this using scans with apparent lesion growth after SABR from 68 patients. We performed bootstrapped experiments using radiomics and explored the use of multiple regions of interest (ROIs). The best model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.66 and used a sphere with a diameter equal to the lesion's longest axial measurement as the ROI. We also investigated the effect of using inter-feature and volume correlation filters and found that the former was detrimental to performance and that the latter had no effect. We also found that the radiomics features ranked as highly important by the model were significantly correlated with outcomes. These findings represent a key step in developing a tool that can help determine who would benefit from follow-up invasive interventions when a SABR-treated lesion increases in size, which could help provide better treatment for patients.

Single vs. multiple fraction non-inferiority trial of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligo-metastases/progression: SIMPLIFY-SABR-COMET

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy delivery regimens can vary between a single fraction (SF) and multiple fractions (MF) given daily for up to several weeks depending on the location of the cancer or metastases. With limited evidence comparing fractionation regimens for oligometastases, there is support to explore toxicity levels to nearby organs at risk as a primary outcome while using SF and MF stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) as well as explore differences in patient-reported quality of life and experience.

METHODS

This study will randomize 598 patients in a 1:1 ratio between the standard arm (MF SABR) and the experimental arm (SF SABR). This trial is designed as two randomized controlled trials within one patient population for resource efficiency. The primary objective of the first randomization is to determine if SF SABR is non-inferior to MF SABR, with respect to healthcare provider (HCP)-reported grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) that are related to SABR. Primary endpoint is toxicity while secondary endpoints include lesional control rate (LCR), and progression-free survival (PFS). The second randomization (BC Cancer sites only) will allocate participants to either complete quality of life (QoL) questionnaires only; or QoL questionnaires and a symptom-specific survey with symptom-guided HCP intervention. The primary objective of the second randomization is to determine if radiation-related symptom questionnaire-guided HCP intervention results in improved reported QoL as measured by the EuroQoL-5-dimensions-5levels (EQ-5D-5L) instrument. The primary endpoint is patient-reported QoL and secondary endpoints include: persistence/resolution of symptom reporting, QoL, intervention cost effectiveness, resource utilization, and overall survival.

DISCUSSION

This study will compare SF and MF SABR in the treatment of oligometastases and oligoprogression to determine if there is non-inferior toxicity for SF SABR in selected participants with 1-5 oligometastatic lesions. This study will also compare patient-reported QoL between participants who receive radiation-related symptom-guided HCP intervention and those who complete questionnaires alone.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05784428. Date of Registration: 23 March 2023.

HPV-negative head and neck cancers with adverse pathological features carry specific molecular changes that are associated with survival

BACKGROUND

Adverse pathological features following surgery in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are strongly associated with survival and guide adjuvant therapy. We investigated molecular changes associated with these features.

METHODS

We downloaded data from the Cancer Genome Atlas and Cancer Proteome Atlas HNSCC cohorts. We compared tumors positive versus negative for perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), extracapsular spread (ECS), and positive margins (PSM), with multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

All pathological features were associated with poor survival, as were the following molecular changes: low cyclin E1 (HR = 1.7) and high PKC-alpha (HR = 1.8) in tumors with PNI; six of 13 protein abundance changes with LVI; greater tumor hypoxia and high Raptor (HR = 2.0) and Rictor (HR = 1.6) with ECS; and low p38 (HR = 2.3), high fibronectin (HR = 1.6), low annexin A1 (HR = 3.1), and high caspase-9 (HR = 1.6) abundances with PSM.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathological features in HNSCC carry specific molecular changes that may explain their poor prognostic associations.

Personalized Treatment of Recurrent, Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer Guided by Patient-Derived Xenograft Models

Recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RMHNSCC) is associated with a poor prognosis and short survival duration. There is an urgent need to identify personalized predictors of drug response to guide the selection of the most effective therapy for each individual recurrence. We tested the feasibility of patient-derived xenografts (PDX) for guiding their RMHNSCC salvage treatment. Fresh tumor samples from eligible, consented patients were implanted into mice. Established tumors were expanded in mouse PDX cohorts to identify responses to candidate salvage drug treatments in parallel testing. Patients alive and suitable for chemotherapy were treated based on responses determined by PDX testing. Nine patient tumors were successfully engrafted in mice with an average time of 89.2±41.7 days. Four patients' PDX models underwent parallel drug testing. Two patients received PDX-guided therapy. In one of these patients, single agents of cetuximab and paclitaxel demonstrated the best responses in the PDX model, and this patient exhibited sequential partial responses to each drug, including a 17-month clinical response to cetuximab. The main limitation of PDX testing for RMHNSCC was the time delay in obtaining testing results. Despite this, parallel PDX testing may be feasible for a subset of patients and appears to correlate with clinical benefit.

What is the predictive value of RECIST criteria following stereotactic lung radiation?

PURPOSE

Response EvaluationCriteriain Solid Tumors (RECIST) is commonly used to assess response to anti-cancer therapies. However, its application after lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is complicated by radiation-induced lung changes. This study assesses the frequency of progressive disease (PD) by RECIST following lung SABR and correlates this with actual treatment outcomes as determined by longitudinal follow-up.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We reviewed patients treated with lung SABR for primary lung tumors or oligometastases between 2010 and 2015. Patients were treated with SABR doses of 54-60 Gy in 3-8 fractions. All follow-up scans were assessed and the treated lesion was serially measured over time, with the maximum diameter on axial CT slices used for RECIST calculations. Lesions demonstrating PD by RECIST criteria were identified and subsequently followed for long-term outcomes. The final 'gold-standard' assessment of response was based on size changes after PD and, as available, positron emission tomography scan and/or biopsy.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight lesions met inclusion criteria. Seventy-five were lung primaries and thirteen were lung metastases. Median follow-up was 52 months (interquartile range: 33-68). Two-thirds (66 %, 58/88) of treated lesions met RECIST criteria for PD; however, local recurrence was only confirmed in 16 % (9/58) of cases. Most lesions that triggered PD by RECIST (47/58, 81 %) were ultimately found not to represent recurrence, while a minority (2/58, 3 %) had an uncertain response. The positive predictive value [PPV] of a RECIST defined PD event was 0.16. If PD was triggered within 12-months post-treatment, PPV was 0.08, compared to 0.21 for lesions triggering PD after 12-months.

CONCLUSION

Using RECIST criteria, two-thirds of patients treated with lung SABR met criteria for PD. However, only a minority had recurrence, leading to a poor PPV of RECIST. This highlights the limitations of RECIST in this setting and provides context for physicians when interpreting post-lung SABR imaging.

Loss of LRP1B expression drives acquired chemo and radio-resistance in HPV-positive head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVES

Although human papillomavirus positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients typically experience excellent survival, 15-20 % of patients recur after treatment with chemotherapy and radiation. Therefore, there is a need for biomarkers of treatment failure to guide treatment intensity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Whole genome sequencing was carried out on HPV+OPSCC patients who were primarily treated with concurrent chemotherapy (cisplatin) and radiation. We then explored whether the loss of LRP1Bwas sufficient to drive an aggressive phenotype, and promote a resistance to cisplatin and radiation therapy both in vitro using HPV+ cell lines (93VU147T, UMSCC47, UWO37 and UWO23) and in vivo.

RESULTS

Through integrative genomic analysis of three HPV+OPSCC tumour datasets, we identified that deletion of LRP1B was enriched in samples that recurred following chemo-radiation. Knockdown using siRNA in four HPV+ cell lines (UWO23, UWO37, UMSCC47 and 93VU147T) resulted in increased proliferation of all cases. CRISPR/Cas9 deletion of LRP1B in the same cell line panel demonstrated increased proliferation, clonogenic growth and migration, as well as resistance to both cisplatin and radiation in LRP1B deleted cells compared to their respective non-targeting control cells. Cell line derived xenograft studies indicated that the LRP1B knockout tumours were more resistant to cisplatin and radiation therapy compared to their controls invivo.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, our work implicates LRP1B deletion as a potential biomarker for identifying treatment resistant HPV+ OPSCC cases.

All that Glitters is Not Gold: Examining Cost Effectiveness Analyses in Radiation Oncology

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Cost effectiveness analyses (CEA) provide data for health policy decisions in resource constrained environments. These are important in Radiation Oncology as infrastructure and delivery costs increase and indications expand. The purpose of this study was to systematically review methodologic quality and trends in CEAs involving radiotherapy (RT).

MATERIALS/METHODS

A systematic review was performed on cost effectiveness/utility studies involving RT, querying PubMed and Embase from inception to September 2020. Non-English, reviews, abstracts and cost-only studies were excluded. Independent reviewers screened and abstracted study demographics, economic parameters and methodological details.

RESULTS

After screening 1652 abstracts, 214 met criteria. The first publication was in 1995, and more than half (n = 113, 53%) were published after 2014. Author institutions were from North America (n = 128, 60%), Europe (n = 49, 23%) and Asia (n = 30, 14%) with most reporting in US$ (n = 143, 67%). A majority utilized a decision model (n = 164, 77%), healthcare payer perspective (n = 171, 80%) and a finite time horizon (n = 108, 50%). Publications spanned 96 unique journals, most commonly International Journal of Radiation and Oncological Biology and Physics (n = 35, 16%). Treatment intent was curative in 171 studies. Disease sites included breast (n = 34, 16%), genitourinary (n = 31, 14%), and gastrointestinal (n = 31, 14%). RT was mostly used as primary treatment (n = 144, 67%), followed by adjuvant (n = 70, 33%) and neoadjuvant (n = 10, 5%). Emerging topics included stereotactic RT (n = 45, 21%), immunotherapy (n = 6, 3%), oligometastasis (n = 4, 2%), and heavy particles (n = 23, 11%). RT was compared to other RT (n = 136, 64%), surgery (n = 43, 20%), drugs (n = 14, 7%) and observation (n = 31, 17%). Incomplete reporting was common. Missing elements included analysis perspective (n = 13, 6%), time horizon (n = 38, 18%), discounting of utilities (n = 71, 33%) or costs (n = 54, 25%), and willingness-to-pay threshold (n = 59, 28%). Furthermore, 27 studies did not perform sensitivity analyses, 36 did not evaluate incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and only 60 explicitly utilized recognized reporting guidelines. Conflict of interest statements were found in 63%, with sponsor statements in 59%; 25% were industry sponsors. Outcome parameters were obtained from primary (author institution/trial data) sources in 33%, including randomized trials (RCTs) (n = 20, 9%), retrospective data (n = 20, 9%) and population data (n = 9, 4%). The remainder utilized secondary sources including RCTs (n = 71, 33%), retrospective data (n = 35, 16%) or meta-analyses (n = 11, 5%). Outcomes included quality adjusted life years (n = 158, 74%), life-years (n = 30, 14%) or toxicity (n = 26,12%). 31% utilized author generated utilities; of literature derived only 49% were matched to disease and clinical context.

CONCLUSION

While CEAs are increasingly common in RT, reporting and methodologic rigor must improve. Greater use of published guidelines will improve data quality for decision makers.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Oligo-Progressive Cancers: Results of the Randomized Phase II STOP Trial

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

In the metastatic setting, there is uncertain benefit to localized eradication of one or more lesions that are progressing despite systemic therapy. This randomized phase II trial examined if patients with ≤5 sites of oligoprogression benefited from the addition of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to standard of care (SOC) systemic therapy.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Eligibility criteria included age ≥18 years, ECOG performance status 0-2, and oligoprogressive disease, defined as 1-5 lesions actively progressing while on systemic therapy. Patients were required to have at least 3 months of disease stability/response on systemic therapy prior to oligoprogression. After stratifying by type of systemic therapy (cytotoxic vs. non-cytotoxic), patients were randomized 2:1 to SABR to all progressing lesions plus SOC (SABR arm) vs. SOC alone (SOC arm). The trial began exclusive to non-small cell lung cancer but did not meet accrual goals and was expanded in 2019 to include all non-hematologic malignancies. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), lesional control, quality of life (QOL), toxicity, and duration of current systemic agent post-SABR.

RESULTS

Between February 2017 and June 2021, 90 patients with 125 oligoprogressive metastases were enrolled across 8 Canadian institutions, with 59 patients randomized to SABR and 31 to SOC. Median age was 67 years (IQR: 61-73 years) and 39 (43%) were female. The most common primary sites were lung (44% of patients), genitourinary (23%) and breast (13%), with the most common oligo-progressive locations being lung (43%), bone (19%), lymph nodes (14%), and liver (13%). In the SABR arm, the most common fractionations were 35 Gy/5 (38% of lesions) and 50 Gy/5 (18%). Protocol adherence in the SOC arm was suboptimal: 3 patients (10%) withdrew immediately after randomization, and 7 additional patients (23%) received high-dose or ablative therapies. Median follow-up was 31 months. There was no difference in PFS between arms (median PFS 8.4 months in the SABR arm vs. 4.3 months in the SOC arm; however, the curves cross and 2-year PFS was 9% vs. 24% respectively, p = 0.91). Median OS was 31.2 months vs. 27.4 months, respectively (p = 0.22). Lesional control with SABR was 71% vs. 39% with SOC (p = 0.002). Median duration of post-randomization first-line systemic therapy was 10.3 months vs. 7.6 months, respectively (p = 0.71). Treatment was well-tolerated with 2 (3.4%) grade 3 treatment-related toxicities in the SABR arm and no grade 4/5 related events in either arm. QOL did not differ between arms.

CONCLUSION

Despite being a well-tolerated treatment providing superior lesional control, SABR for oligoprogression did not improve PFS or OS. Results may have been impacted by withdrawals and desire for ablative treatments on the SOC arm, and this lack of equipoise may make accrual to phase III trials difficult, although larger studies in select sub-populations are desired. (NCT02756793).

Assessment of Precision Irradiation in Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Interstitial Lung Disease (ASPIRE-ILD): Primary Analysis of a Phase II Trial

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

The use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) has been associated with an increased risk of toxicity, but patients with ILD and lung cancer may have no other options for curative-intent treatment. The goal of the ASPIRE-ILD trial was to assess the benefits and toxicities of SABR in patients with fibrotic ILD.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We enrolled patients with fibrotic ILD and a diagnosis of T1-2N0 NSCLC who were not candidates for surgery. All patients were centrally reviewed prior to enrollment to confirm the presence and subtype of ILD. After stratification by the ILD-GAP score (a measure of ILD severity and prognosis), patients were treated with SABR to a dose of 50 Gy in 5 fractions EOD (BED = 100 Gy10), with a built-in de-escalation protocol in case of unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), powered to distinguish 1-year OS >70% vs. an unacceptable rate of ≤50%. Secondary endpoints included toxicity (CTC-AE version 4.0), progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), patient-reported outcomes (FACT-L quality of life and cough severity), and changes in pulmonary function tests (PFTs). The study pre-specified that SABR would be considered worthwhile if median OS was >1 year, with a grade 3-4 toxicity risk <35% and a grade 5 toxicity risk <15%. Target accrual was 39 treated patients.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were enrolled and treated with SABR between March 2019 and January 2022, all to a dose of 50 Gy in 5 fractions, at 5 institutions in Canada and 1 in Scotland. Median age was 78 years (interquartile range: 67-83), 59% were male, and 92% had a history of smoking (median 43 pack-years). At baseline, 70% reported dyspnea, median FEV1 was 80% predicted and median DLCO was 49% predicted. ILD-GAP scores were as follows: ≤2 (i.e., best ILD status): n = 14; 3-5: n = 23; ≥6 (i.e., worst ILD status): n = 2. Median follow-up was 19 months. OS at 1-year was 78.9% (p<0.001 by binomial test vs. the unacceptable rate). Median OS was 25 months, median PFS was 19 months, and 2-year LC was 92%. AE rates (possibly, probably or definitely related) were as follows (highest grade per patient): grade 1-2: n = 12 (31%); grade 3: n = 4 (10%); grade 4; n = 0; grade 5 n = 3 (7.7%, all due to respiratory deterioration). AE rates did not differ by ILD-GAP category or ILD subtype. FACT-L scores trended downward over time (p = 0.07), and cough severity scale scores worsened over time (p = 0.02). Comparing last-available PFTs with baseline, DLCO declined (median: -4%; p = 0.046), FVC trended downward (median: -2.5%; p = 0.11), and FEV1 remained stable (median change: 0%).

CONCLUSION

The use of SABR in patients with ILD met the pre-specified acceptability thresholds for both toxicity and efficacy, supporting the use of SABR for curative-intent treatment after a careful discussion of risks and benefits. Further studies exploring pharmacologic options to reduce toxicity may be beneficial in this population. ().

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Academic Productivity in Oncology: A Journal-, Conference- and Author-level Analysis

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

The objective of this study was to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on academic productivity in oncology as measured by conference abstracts, journal publications and individual authorship trends.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Using a reference time frame of 2018 to 2022, we obtained data on the number of abstracts and articles submitted and published from a selection of oncology conferences and journals. To assess individual authorship patterns, we randomly selected 200 articles from 2018 (i.e., the 'index paper') and tracked publications over subsequent years for the first or last authors. Linear time-trend analyses and independent two-sample t-tests were used to assess changes in academic productivity over time, and univariable and multivariable linear regression were used to analyze individual factors predictive of publication rates, including gender, continent, specialty, MD vs. non-MD, and career status (early if within 5 years of training completion vs. late for all others).

RESULTS

Data on submitted and published abstracts were available from 5 and 7 conferences, respectively. Both abstract categories demonstrated decreasing values over time but not statistically significant: conference submissions decreased from 15,308 in 2018 to 13,623 in 2022, (p = 0.11), and published abstracts decreased from 13,111 to 11,848, respectively (p = 0.16). Journal submissions were available from 6 journals and increased from 14,142 in 2018 to a peak of 20,241 in 2020 (2018 vs. 2020: p<0.001), and then declined to 15,650 in 2021. Journal publications from 10 journals showed no clear trends over time (p = 0.64). For the author-level analysis, of the 200 authors randomly selected, the majority were male (66.5%), from North America (55.5%), with an MD degree (80.9%, 131/162) and late career (86.6%, 129/149). Most common specialties included surgery (29%), radiation oncology (18.5%), epidemiology/public health (11%) and medical oncology (10%). For articles authored per year, there was no linear trend detected (p = 0.51), although mean number of publications per author peaked in 2020/2021 (papers/year for 2018-2022: 18.1, 18.1, 20.1, 21.2, 19.6). On univariable analysis, factors significantly associated with increasing publication rates were male gender, last author position on index paper, late career status, MDs, speciality of surgery or public/health epidemiology, and authors from Asia (all p<0.01). On multivariable analysis, factors remaining significantly predictive were late career status, MDs, specialty of surgeons or public health/epidemiologists, and authors from Asia (all p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Conference submissions and publications trended downward from 2018 to 2022. Journal submissions peaked overall in 2020, but did not translate to increases in journal publication rates. Disparities in publication trends were found, based on speciality and geographic regions, including a negative impact on early-career researchers.

Predicting Dosimetry of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Multiple Lung Lesions

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has recently been used to treat increasing numbers of lung metastases, either synchronously or over multiple courses of treatment. Selecting the optimal dose and fractionation to balance risk of local failure and treatment toxicity is challenging. This project uses machine learning to provide rapid dosimetry predictions of SABR to multiple lung lesions, allowing exploration of different dose prescription options prior to the radiation (RT) planning process.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A generative adversarial network (GAN) was trained to predict the dosimetry of multi-lesion thoracic SABR treatment from the planning CT scan, target and organ at risk contours, and the prescribed dose-fractionation without the need to carry out treatment planning. RT plans of patients who received at least one SABR treatment for ≥2 lung lesions between 2014-2020 at a single tertiary center were included in the analysis. All prescriptions were converted to their equivalent doses in two Gray fractions (EQD2). SABR treatments received at different timepoints were registered, and EQD2 doses were accumulated with no repair. Model performance was assessed using 5-fold cross validation. Plans were randomly divided into 5 folds, stratified by the number of lesions (no patients crossed folds). Each fold served as the testing set once, with the model trained on the other 4 folds. The model was evaluated on the difference in the volume of lung receiving above 20 Gray (V20) of the predicted dosimetry compared to the true dosimetry.

RESULTS

Treatment plans (n = 103) were included from 81 patients with 280 lesions (62, 23, 8, and 10 plans had 2, 3, 4, and ≥5 lesions respectively). Fifty-five, 18, and 4 patients had a single, 2 and 3 courses of RT respectively. Fifty-two patients were treated for primary lung cancer, 28 patients treated for metastases from other sites, and 1 patient for both. Seven patients (8.6%) developed ≥ Grade 2 pneumonitis. Doses prescribed were 60/8 (n = 136), 55/5 (n = 49), 54/3 (n = 27), 24/1 (n = 21), 35/5 (n = 13), 30/5 (n = 9), and other (n = 25). The mean lung V20 for all patients was 11.3% [1.5%-29.6%]; the mean lung V20 was 9.3%, 12.2%, 13.5% and 20.4% for plans with 2, 3, 4, ≥ 5 lesions respectively. The mean absolute difference (MAD) in lung V20 between the predicted dosimetry and true dosimetry over all 5-folds was 1.9% [0.0%-13.4%]; the MAD in lung V20 between the predicted and actual dosimetry was 1.6%, 2.1%, 2.9% and 2.6% for plans with 2, 3, 4, ≥ 5 lesions respectively.

CONCLUSION

The GAN-based model created in this study can predict the dosimetry of any number of lesions in the thorax treated with SABR. The model can be used to quickly determine the feasibility of SABR treatment for multiple synchronous lesions, or in the retreatment setting. The ability to explore the dosimetry of different prescription options for a given patient prior to RT planning may allow for personalized risk-adapted treatment if combined with local control and toxicity modelling.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy before resection to avoid delay for early-stage lung cancer or oligometastases during the COVID-19 pandemic: Pathologic outcomes from the SABR-BRIDGE protocol

BACKGROUND

During coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related operating room closures, some multidisciplinary thoracic oncology teams adopted a paradigm of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) as a bridge to surgery, an approach called SABR-BRIDGE. This study presents the preliminary surgical and pathological results.

METHODS

Eligible participants from four institutions (three in Canada and one in the United States) had early-stage presumed or biopsy-proven lung malignancy that would normally be surgically resected. SABR was delivered using standard institutional guidelines, with surgery >3 months following SABR with standardized pathologic assessment. Pathological complete response (pCR) was defined as absence of viable cancer. Major pathologic response (MPR) was defined as ≤10% viable tissue.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients underwent SABR. Most common SABR regimens were 34 Gy/1 (29%, n = 21), 48 Gy/3-4 (26%, n = 19), and 50/55 Gy/5 (22%, n = 16). SABR was well-tolerated, with one grade 5 toxicity (death 10 days after SABR with COVID-19) and five grade 2-3 toxicities. Following SABR, 26 patients underwent resection thus far (13 pending surgery). Median time-to-surgery was 4.5 months post-SABR (range, 2-17.5 months). Surgery was reported as being more difficult because of SABR in 38% (n = 10) of cases. Thirteen patients (50%) had pCR and 19 (73%) had MPR. Rates of pCR trended higher in patients operated on at earlier time points (75% if within 3 months, 50% if 3-6 months, and 33% if ≥6 months; p = .069). In the exploratory best-case scenario analysis, pCR rate does not exceed 82%.

CONCLUSIONS

The SABR-BRIDGE approach allowed for delivery of treatment during a period of operating room closure and was well-tolerated. Even in the best-case scenario, pCR rate does not exceed 82%.

Radiation and immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a practical review of rationale, recent data, and research questions

The combined use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is an emerging treatment paradigm for oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent phase I and II trial data suggest that SABR to multiple metastases in addition to ICI use is safe and effective with promising progression-free survival and overall survival signals. There is great interest in capitalizing on combined immunomodulation from these two modalities for the treatment of oligometastatic NSCLC. Ongoing trials seek to validate the safety, efficacy, and preferred sequencing of SABR and ICI. This narrative review of the role of SABR when combined with ICI in oligometastatic NSCLC discusses the rationale for this bimodality treatment, summarizes recent clinical trial evidence, and proposes key principles of management based on the available evidence.

Ensuring Superior Reporting of Radiation Therapy Noninferiority Trials: A Systematic Review

Purpose

Although the frequency of noninferiority trials is increasing, the consistency of the reporting of these trials can vary. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the reporting quality of radiation therapy noninferiority trials.

Methods and Materials

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were queried for randomized controlled radiation therapy trials with noninferiority hypotheses published in English between January 2000 and July 2022, and this was performed by an information scientist. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data.

Results

Of 423 records screened, 59 (14%) were included after full-text review. All were published after 2003 and open label. The most common primary cancer type was breast (n = 15, 25%). Altered radiation fractionation (n = 26, 45%) and radiation de-escalation (n = 11, 19%) were the most common types of interventions. The most common primary endpoints were locoregional control (n = 17, 29%) and progression-free survival (n = 14, 24%). Fifty-three (90%) reported the noninferiority margin, and only 9 (17%) provided statistical justification for the margin. The median absolute noninferiority margin was 9% (interquartile range, 5%-10%), and the median relative margin was 1.51 (interquartile range, 1.33-2.04). Sample size calculations and confidence intervals were reported in 54 studies (92%). Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were reported in 27 studies (46%). In 31 trials (53%), noninferiority of the primary endpoint was reached.

Conclusions

There was variability in the reporting of key components of noninferiority trials. We encourage consideration of additional statistical reasoning such as guidelines or previous trials in the selection of the noninferiority margin, reporting both absolute and relative margins, and the avoidance of statistically vague or misleading language in the reporting of future noninferiority trials.

Top Ten Lessons Learned from Trials in Oligometastatic Cancers

Recent evidence supports the role of aggressive local treatment in the oligometastatic setting. In this review, we discuss the top 10 lessons we have learned from trials in oligometastatic cancers. Major lessons learned pertain to definitions of oligometastatic disease, outcomes, toxicity, costs, and the combination of ablative therapies with systemic therapy, including immunotherapy. Barriers to accrual for trials and upcoming phase III trials are also reviewed. These lessons may help to inform clinical practice and may be the basis for future research in the oligometastatic space.

What is the future of treatment de-escalation for HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer? A review of ongoing clinical trials

Background

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has increased in incidence in recent decades. With higher cure rates in younger populations, long-term survivors may live with acute- and long-term toxicity, leading to increased interest in de-escalation treatment strategies for HPV-related OPSCC. Herein, we have examined the current landscape of clinical trials in this context.

Methods

A review of active clinical trials related to de-escalation of HPV-associated OPSCC treatment was performed using the clinicaltrials.gov database from inception to January 2022. A search using the key words "oropharyngeal cancer" and "HPV" was completed. Three investigators independently reviewed each trial, with any discrepancies settled by a fourth. Data collected from each study included study phase, study design, primary, and secondary endpoints, and de-escalation treatment strategies. A final 24 articles were selected for full text review.

Results

Many trials (n=19, 79%) were non-randomized, and most studies employed a phase II design (n=14, 58%). Only 13% (n=3) were randomized trials, and 8% (n=2) included a phase III component. The most frequent primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) (n=9, 37.5%). With regards to the identified de-escalation strategies, all the studies (n=24) had at least one component assessing changes in RT dose/fractionation and/or a reduction in RT volumes. A smaller percentage of trials assessed surgical interventions (n=9, 37.5%) and/or changes in systemic therapy (n=8, 33.3%).

Conclusion

A small number of randomized trials are underway, and a transition to more randomized phase III trials in the future will be important to change clinical practice.

Oligometastases: Emerging Evidence

The hypothesis that ablative therapies (such as surgery or radiation) can be used to cure patients with a limited number of metastases was influential in changing practice. Early assertions of efficacy were based on observational studies, often without control groups, showing better-than-expected outcomes. However, in the past decade, new evidence from randomized trials has emerged, which in some cases have affirmed old hypotheses, but in other cases have raised new questions. In this review, we discuss the challenges in defining oligometastatic disease, summarize the randomized evidence evaluating metastasis-directed therapy in patients with oligometastatic disease, provide context for the difficulty in generating randomized evidence, and examine ongoing phase III studies.

DART: diagnostic-CT-enabled planning: a randomized trial in palliative radiation therapy (study protocol)

BACKGROUND

Palliative radiotherapy (PRT) is an effective treatment for managing symptoms of advanced cancer. At least half of all radiation treatments are delivered with palliative intent, aimed at relieving symptoms, such as pain or shortness of breath. Symptomatic patients must receive PRT quickly, therefore expeditious treatment planning is essential. Standard radiation planning requires a dedicated CT scan acquired at the cancer centre, called a 'CT simulation', which facilitates treatment planning (i.e. tumor delineation, placement of radiation beams and dose calculation). However, the CT simulation process creates a bottleneck and often leads to delays in starting treatment. Other researchers have indicated that CT simulation can be replaced by the use of standard diagnostic CT scans for target delineation and planning, which are normally acquired through the radiology department as part of standard patient workup. The goals of this feasibility study are to assess the efficacy, acceptability and scalability of diagnostic-CT-enabled planning, compared to conventional CT simulation planning, for patients receiving PRT to bone, soft tissue and lung disease.

METHODS

This is a randomized, phase II study, with 33 PRT patients to be randomized in a 1:2 ratio between conventional CT simulation (Arm 1), and the diagnostic CT enabled planning workflow (Arm 2). Patients will be stratified by treatment target volume (bone and soft tissue metastasis vs. primary or metastatic intrathoracic disease targets). The primary endpoint is the amount of time the patient spends at the cancer centre. Secondary endpoints include efficacy (rate of plan deliverability and rate of plan acceptability on blinded dose distribution review), stakeholder acceptability (based on patient and clinician perception of acceptability questionnaires) and scalability.

DISCUSSION

This study will investigate the efficacy, acceptability and scalability of a "sim-free" PRT pathway compared to conventional CT simulation. The workflow may provide opportunity for resource optimization by using pre-existing diagnostic imaging and requires minimal investment due to its similarity to current PRT models. It also offers potential benefit to patients by eliminating an imaging procedure, reducing the amount of time spent at the cancer centre, and expediting time to treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05233904. Date of registration: February 10, 2022; current version: 1.4 on April 29, 2022.

Determining Planning Priorities for SABR for Oligometastatic Disease: A Secondary Analysis of the SABR-COMET Phase II Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

SABR may improve survival in patients with oligometastases, but for some lesions, safe delivery of SABR may require a reduction in delivered dose or target coverage. This study assessed the association between target coverage compromise and oncologic and survival outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with a controlled primary malignancy and 1 to 5 oligometastases were randomized (1:2) between standard of care (SOC) treatment and SOC plus SABR. In patients receiving SABR, the target dose coverage was reduced to meet organ at risk (OAR) constraints, if necessary. The D99 value (minimum dose received by the hottest 99% of the planning target volume [PTV]) was used as a measure of PTV coverage for each treatment plan, and the relationship between the coverage compromise index (CCI, defined as D99/prescription dose) and patient outcomes was assessed.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients in the SABR arm had dosimetric information available and a total of 109 lesions were evaluated. The mean CCI per lesion was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.56-1.61). Of the 109 lesions evaluated, 29.4% (n = 32) required coverage compromise (CCI <0.9). Adrenal metastases required coverage compromise in 100% of analyzed lesions (n = 7). CCI was not significantly associated with lesional control, adverse events, overall survival (OS), or progression-free survival (PFS).

CONCLUSIONS

Target compromise was required in a substantial minority of cases, but PTV coverage was not associated with OS, progression-free survival, or lesional control. This suggests that OAR constraints used for SABR treatments in the oligometastatic setting should continue to be prioritized during planning.

Should Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Be Used for Oligometastatic Disease?

Should SABR Be Used for Oligometastatic Disease?The efficacy of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in the oligometastatic setting has not been shown in phase 3 randomized controlled trials for breast (or many other) cancers. We review the evidence base and propose a trial to address the question, should stereotactic ablative radiotherapy be used for oligometastatic disease?

Sarcopenia in head and neck cancer: A scoping review

OBJECTIVES

In those undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC), sarcopenia is a strong prognostic factor for outcomes and mortality. This review identified working definitions and methods used to objectively assess sarcopenia in HNC.

METHOD

The scoping review was performed in accordance with Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage methodology and the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines.

INFORMATION SOURCES

Eligible studies were identified using MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases.

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria represented studies of adult HNC patients in which sarcopenia was listed as an outcome, full-text articles written in English, and empirical research studies with a quantitative design.

DATA EXTRACTION

Eligible studies were assessed using a proprietary data extraction form. General information, article details and characteristics, and details related to the concept of the scoping review were extracted in an iterative process.

RESULTS

Seventy-six studies published internationally from 2016 to 2021 on sarcopenia in HNC were included. The majority were retrospective (n = 56; 74%) and the prevalence of sarcopenia ranged from 3.8% to 78.7%. Approximately two-thirds of studies used computed tomography (CT) to assess sarcopenia. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) (n = 53; 70%) was the most prevalent metric used to identify sarcopenia, followed by SMI at the third cervical vertebra (C3) (n = 4; 5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, the most effective strategy to assess sarcopenia in HNC depends on several factors, including access to resources, patient and treatment characteristics, and the prognostic significance of outcomes used to represent sarcopenia. Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) measured at C3 may represent a practical, precise, and cost-effective biomarker for the detection of sarcopenia. However, combining SMM measurements at C3 with other sarcopenic parameters-including muscle strength and physical performance-may provide a more accurate risk profile for sarcopenia assessment and allow for a greater understanding of this condition in HNC.

Immune-based classification of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer with implications for biomarker-driven treatment de-intensification

BACKGROUND

There is significant interest in treatment de-escalation for human papillomavirus-associated (HPV⁺) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients given the generally favourable prognosis. However, 15-30% of patients recur after primary treatment, reflecting a need for improved risk-stratification tools. We sought to develop a molecular test to risk stratify HPV⁺ OPSCC patients.

METHODS

We created an immune score (UWO3) associated with survival outcomes in six independent cohorts comprising 906 patients, including blinded retrospective and prospective external validations. Two aggressive radiation de-escalation cohorts were used to assess the ability of UWO3 to identify patients who recur. Multivariate Cox models were used to assess the associations between the UWO3 immune class and outcomes.

FINDINGS

A three-gene immune score classified patients into three immune classes (immune rich, mixed, or immune desert) and was strongly associated with disease-free survival in six datasets, including large retrospective and prospective datasets. Pooled analysis demonstrated that the immune rich group had superior disease-free survival compared to the immune desert (HR = 9.0, 95% CI: 3.2-25.5, P = 3.6 × 10^-5) and mixed (HR = 6.4, 95% CI: 2.2-18.7, P = 0.006) groups after adjusting for age, sex, smoking status, and AJCC8 clinical stage. Finally, UWO3 was able to identify patients from two small treatment de-escalation cohorts who remain disease-free after aggressive de-escalation to 30 Gy radiation.

INTERPRETATION

With additional prospective validation, the UWO3 score could enable biomarker-driven clinical decision-making for patients with HPV⁺ OPSCC based on robust outcome prediction across six independent cohorts. Prospective de-escalation and intensification clinical trials are currently being planned.

FUNDING

CIHR, European Union, and the NIH.

Evaluating The Oncology Research Internship (Orion) During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of Virtual and In-Person Iterations

Background

The Oncology Research Internship (ORIoN), a novel resident-supervised initiative for medical students (MS), was first established in 2018 and found to be beneficial to both residents and MS. The COVID-19 pandemic halted many scholarly programs which relied heavily on mentorship through in-person interactions. We report results of the first virtual program, adapted to the COVID-19 pandemic, and compare participant feedback to previous in-person iterations.

Methods

ORIoN applications were open to first- and second-year MS. A panel of 3 physicians reviewed and scored applications. Successful MS applicants were paired with resident supervisors; each pair supervised by a staff oncologist. Compared to previous years, all meetings, correspondences and presentations between MS, residents, and supervising oncologists were conducted exclusively remotely. At the program's conclusion, each MS delivered a live virtual oral presentation of their completed case report, previously done in-person. Resident and MS participants completed questionnaires pre-/post program. Responses were collected on a 5-point Likert scale. Survey results from this virtual and the previous in-person programs were compared.

Results

Of 54 applications (previously 32 in 2018), 9 MS (three first-year, six second-year) were accepted and assigned to 9 volunteer residents (6 radiation oncology, 2 medical oncology, 1 pathology). To date, 9 manuscripts have been completed with 2 submitted for publication (1 published, 1 under review). Survey response rates were 100% (9/9) for residents and 89% (8/9) for MS. In the post-program surveys comparing the virtual and prior in-person programs, 87.5% (7/8) MS felt comfortable completing a clinical research project (22% strongly agree (SA), 62.5% agree (A), previously 25% and 75% respectively) and 100% (8/8) felt comfortable writing a case report (50% SA, 50% A, previously 75%, 25% respectively). All MS felt comfortable giving an oral research presentation (37.5% SA, 62.5% A) and teaching another MS to complete a case report (37.5% SA, 50% A). Similar to the in-person program, MS unanimously agreed that ORIoN was a beneficial experience (100%) and felt the program contributed to their career goals (100%, previously 88%). Post-program, all residents felt comfortable as a supervisor (67% SA, 22% A, previously 33%, 67% respectively), reviewing manuscripts (56% SA, 33% A, previously 33%, 50% respectively) and providing constructive feedback to trainees (67% SA, 33% A, previously 17%, 67% respectively).

Discussion

Compared to the in-person program, the virtual ORIoN retained strongly favourable ratings from MS and residents alike. These findings support adapting similar programs to a virtual setting when in-person interactions are not feasible.

Risk Factors for Poor Survival Outcomes in Parotid Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to analyze risk factors associated with poor survival outcomes for metastatic cutaneous head-and-neck SCC to the parotid.

METHODS

All patients undergoing surgery for metastatic cutaneous SCC to the parotid with curative intent between 2011 and 2018, were reviewed. Demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated. Histopathological data including tumor size and histology, tumor grade, TNM stage, resection margins, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion, were analyzed. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and freedom from locoregional recurrence (LRR) were assessed.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were included (mean age, 77 years; 75 men [83.3%]). A total parotidectomy was performed in 48 patients (53.3%), and 42 (46.7%) underwent a superficial parotidectomy. Seventy patients (77.8%) underwent adjuvant RT. The median follow-up was 31 months (20-39 months). Tumor volume ≥ 50 cm³ and a shorter RT duration (<20 days) were associated with reduced OS (p = 0.002 and p = 0.01, p = 0.02 and p = 0.009, respectively), and DSS (p = 0.004 and p = 0.02, p = 0.04 and p = 0.02, respectively) on univariable and multivariable analysis, respectively. Only a shorter RT duration was associated with worse freedom from LRR on univariable and multivariable analysis, (p = 0.04 and p < 0.001, respectively). However, with death as a competing risk, a shorter duration of RT was not significantly associated with freedom from LRR.

CONCLUSION

A shorter duration of adjuvant RT, and excised tumor volume ≥50 cm³ were predictive factors of reduced OS and DSS, and a shorter duration of RT was also associated with reduced freedom from LRR in patients with metastatic SCC to the parotid gland.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4 Laryngoscope, 2022.

Circulating tumor cells detected in follow-up predict survival outcomes in tri-modality management of advanced non-metastatic esophageal cancer: a secondary analysis of the QUINTETT randomized trial

Background

Our aim was to establish if presence of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) predicted worse outcome in patients with non-metastatic esophageal cancer undergoing tri-modality therapy.

Methods

We prospectively collected CTC data from patients with operable non-metastatic esophageal cancer from April 2009 to November 2016 enrolled in our QUINTETT esophageal cancer randomized trial (NCT00907543). Patients were randomized to receive either neoadjuvant cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus radiotherapy followed by surgical resection (Neoadjuvant) or adjuvant cisplatin, 5-FU, and epirubicin chemotherapy with concurrent extended volume radiotherapy following surgical resection (Adjuvant). CTCs were identified with the CellSearch® system before the initiation of any treatment (surgery or chemoradiotherapy) as well as at 6-, 12-, and 24-months post-treatment. The threshold for CTC positivity was one and the findings were correlated with patient prognosis.

Results

CTC data were available for 74 of 96 patients and identified in 27 patients (36.5%) at a median follow-up of 13.1months (interquartile range:6.8-24.1 months). Detection of CTCs at any follow-up visit was significantly predictive of worse disease-free survival (DFS;hazard ratio [HR]: 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-4.24; p=0.002), regional control (HR: 6.18; 95% CI: 1.18-32.35; p=0.031), distant control (HR: 2.93; 95% CI: 1.52-5.65;p=0.001) and overall survival (OS;HR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.16-3.51; p=0.013). After adjusting for receiving neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, the presence of CTCs at any follow-up visit remained significantly predictive of worse OS ([HR]:2.02;95% [Cl]:1.16-3.51; p=0.013) and DFS (HR: 2.49;95% Cl: 1.43-4.33; p=0.001). Similarly, any observed increase in CTCs was significantly predictive of worse OS (HR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.56-6.34; p=0.001) and DFS (HR: 3.34; 95% CI: 1.67-6.69; p<0.001).

Conclusion

The presence of CTCs in patients during follow-up after tri-modality therapy was associated with significantly poorer DFS and OS regardless of timing of chemoradiotherapy.

Can We Identify Predictors of Success in Contouring Education for Radiation Oncology Trainees? An Analysis of the Anatomy and Radiology Contouring Bootcamp: Predictors of Success in Contouring Education

INTRODUCTION

Although several different contouring instructional programs are available to radiation oncologists and trainees, very little is known about which methods and resources benefit learners most, and whether some learners may need alternate forms of instruction. This study aimed to determine the factors that were predictors of learners' success in anatomy, radiology, and contouring education.

METHODS

Participants in the online and face-to-face (F2F) Anatomy and Radiology Contouring (ARC) Bootcamp completed pre- and post-intervention evaluations that assessed anatomy/radiology knowledge, contouring skills, self-confidence, and spatial ability. Baseline factors were assessed as predictors of outcomes across multiple educational domains.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty (F2F: n=40; online: n=140) participants enrolled in the ARC Bootcamp and fifty-seven (F2F: n=30; online: n=27) participants completed both evaluations. Of the participants enrolled, 37% were female, and most were radiation oncology (RO) residents (62%). In the anatomy/radiology knowledge testing, all quartiles (based on baseline performance) improved numerically, however, the largest improvements occurred in learners with the lowest baseline scores (p<0.001). At the end of the Bootcamp, learners with lower-performing scores did not reach the level of learners with the highest baseline scores (Bonferroni-corrected p<0.001). Regarding the contouring assessment, improvements were only evident for the participants with lower-performing baseline scores (p<0.05). Spatial anatomy skills, as measured by the spatial anatomy task, was correlated to contouring ability. Overall, the greatest improvements were seen for learners in postgraduate year 1-3, those with no previous rotation experience in a given discipline, and those who attended from 'other' programs (i.e. medical physics residents and medical students).

CONCLUSIONS

The ARC Bootcamp improved all levels of performers' anatomy and radiology knowledge but only lower-performers' contouring ability. The course alone does not help lower-performing learners reach the abilities of higher-performers. The ARC Bootcamp tends to be most beneficial for participants with less RO experience. Curriculum modifications can be made to help support ARC Bootcamp participants with lower performing scores.

Planning Trade-offs for Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in Patients with 4-10 Metastases: A Sub-study of the SABR-COMET-10 randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for metastases often involves trade-offs, balancing adequate target coverage with the need to maintain a safe dose to organs at risk (OARs). Very few studies have evaluated this complexity in patients with >3 oligometastases. To explore these trade-offs, we analyzed planning outcomes from the first 60 patients enrolled on a randomized trial of SABR in patients with 4-10 metastases.

METHODS

Radiation plans for patients enrolled on the BLINDED-FOR-REVIEW randomized trial were analyzed. Data abstracted included target locations and sizes, dose prescriptions and target coverage, and OAR doses, and these parameters were evaluated based on target location to identify locations where compromise of planning constraints was required.

RESULTS

SABR was planned for 332 lesions in 296 separate PTVs. The median PTV size was 9.0 cc per lesion (interquartile range [IQR]: 5.3-24.3 cc) and 89.1 cc per patient (IQR: 37.0-177.0). The most common prescriptions were 30-35 Gy in 5 fractions (43% of lesions) and 20-24 Gy in 1 fraction (33% of lesions). The maximum dose within the PTV was a median of 124% of prescription (IQR: 117-130%). Only 3.3% of lesions had a dose to 95% of the PTV (D95) <95% of prescription; this was more common for spinal (25%) and lymph node (8.4%) targets (p<0.001), translating to median D95 values of 100.5% (IQR: 99.6%-101.5%) and 100.0% (IQR: 84.6%-100.5%), respectively. All OARs constraints were met in 95.2% of patients, with the only exceptions being lymph node targets (n=3).

CONCLUSIONS

SABR planning for patients with 4-10 metastases was achievable without dosimetric compromise in the large majority of patients. Nodal and spinal targets were most likely to lead to compromise of target coverage or OAR constraints. Further research is needed to determine how to best balance these trade-offs.

The RADIO trial: Randomized assessment of cisplatin dosing interval for ototoxicity with curative concurrent chemo-radiation for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

TPS12144

Background: Patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LASCCHN) receive curative chemoradiation (CRT) with Cisplatin, as a standard of care. A meta-analysis of 52 randomized trials comparing Low Dose (LD) and High Dose (HD) schedules demonstrated differing toxicity profiles but hearing effects were not rigorously studied. Hearing loss associated with HD Cisplatin can result in survivorship challenges. A local study suggested a protective effect for LD Cisplatin in relation to ototoxicity and pharmacogenomic markers, MATE1 and COMT, to be associated with risk for ototoxicity. We hypothesize that LD cisplatin is associated with reduced frequency of hearing loss when compared to the standard HD cisplatin in LASCCHN patients on CRT and that differences in MATE1/COMT can predict for cisplatin-related ototoxicity and be identified prior to treatment. Our goal is to develop an innovative personalized treatment pathway incorporating predictive pharmacogenomics markers to improve the tolerability and survivorship outcomes of curative CRT for LASCCHN. Methods: This is a prospective, open-label, randomized clinical trial. Following informed consent, eligible LASCCHN patients planned for primary CRT will be stratified by tumor p16 status and then randomized in 1:1 fashion to either concurrent LD Cisplatin (40mg/m2 every week) or HD cisplatin (100mg/m2 every 3 weeks). The primary outcome is to measure the change in incidence of CTCAE grade ≥2 hearing loss and hearing-related quality of life (QOL) at 1 year. As part of secondary and exploratory outcomes, differences in survival, loco-regional control, global QOL and other toxicities (e.g. nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity) will be assessed. The relationship between MATE1 and COMT, as predictors for cisplatin-related ototoxicity will be evaluated. Cost-effectiveness analyses comparing the two regimens will be assessed. Statistical plan: Based on rates of CTCAE grade ≥2 hearing loss in an earlier study (Winquist et al., 2016), assuming a conservative rate of hearing loss, amongst treated patients, of 60% with HD cisplatin and 30% with LD cisplatin, a total sample size of 92 patients would achieve > 80% statistical power, (two-sided, alpha = 0.05 test of two proportions) to detect these differences. 100 patients would be targeted to accrual for an assumed 5% noncompliance rate. For hearing related QOL, a two-sided, alpha = 0.05, two-sample t-test with 50 patients per group would achieve > 80% statistical power to detect an effect size of 0.60 and > 95% power to detect an effect size of 0.75. All analyses will be based primarily on the intent-to-treat population. An arms-length data and safety monitoring committee (DSMC) will review safety data bi-annually. Trial accrual status: 60 participants have been accrued. Clinical trial information: NCT03649048.

The quality of life in neoadjuvant versus adjuvant therapy of esophageal cancer treatment trial (QUINTETT): Randomized parallel clinical superiority trial

Background

We compared the health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients undergoing trimodality therapy for resectable stage I‐III esophageal cancer.

Methods

A total of 96 patients were randomized to standard neoadjuvant cisplatin and 5‐fluorouracil chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (neoadjuvant) followed by surgical resection or adjuvant cisplatin, 5‐fluorouracil, and epirubicin chemotherapy with concurrent extended volume radiotherapy (adjuvant) following surgical resection.

Results

There was no significant difference in the functional assessment of cancer therapy‐esophageal (FACT‐E) total scores between arms at 1 year (p = 0.759) with 36% versus 41% (neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant), respectively, showing an increase of ≥15 points compared to pre‐treatment (p = 0.638). The HRQOL was significantly inferior at 2 months in the neoadjuvant arm for FACT‐E, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ‐OG25), and EuroQol 5‐D‐3 L in the dysphagia, reflux, pain, taste, and coughing domains (p < 0.05). Half of patients were able to complete the prescribed neoadjuvant arm chemotherapy without modification compared to only 14% in the adjuvant arm (p < 0.001). Chemotherapy related adverse events of grade ≥2 occurred significantly more frequently in the neoadjuvant arm (100% vs. 69%, p < 0.001). Surgery related adverse events of grade ≥2 were similar in both arms (72% vs. 86%, p = 0.107). There were no 30‐day mortalities and 2% vs. 10% 90‐day mortalities (p = 0.204). There were no significant differences in either overall survival (OS) (5‐year: 35% vs. 32%, p = 0.409) or disease‐free survival (DFS) (5‐year: 31% vs. 30%, p = 0.710).

Conclusion

Trimodality therapy is challenging for patients with resectable esophageal cancer regardless of whether it is given before or after surgery. Newer and less toxic protocols are needed.

Transoral robotic surgery for the identification of unknown primary head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: Its effect on the wait and the weight

BACKGROUND

Neck carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) is a frequent scenario. Transoral robotic mucosectomies (TORM) of pharynx have increased rate of primary identification, but come with cost of treatment delay.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who underwent CUP protocol from 2014 to 2020. Patients with cervical nodes carcinoma and failure to localize a primary source were classified as CUP. We determined primary identification rate and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

We included 65 patients underwent TORM. Surgical approach consisted of lingual and/or palatine tonsillectomies. The primary detection rate was 49.2%. Average weight reduction was 2.5 ± 4.3 kg. The average number of days from consultation to definitive treatment was 52.2 ± 18.3.

CONCLUSION

A systematic approach to patients with CUP showed a promising primary identification rate compared to panendoscopy alone. TORM carries a small risk of complications. The benefits of primary identification must be weighed with the morbidity and delay to definitive treatment.

Endoscopic nodal staging in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) being treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (ENDO-SABR)

Background

Research in treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has shown promising results with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) of oligometastatic disease, wherein distant disease may be limited to one or a few distant organs by host factors. Traditionally, PET/CT has been used in detecting metastatic disease and avoiding futile surgical intervention, however, sensitivity and specificity is limited to only 81 and 79%, respectively. Mediastinal staging still identifies occult nodal disease in up to 20% of NSCLC patients initially thought to be operative candidates. Endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive tool for the staging and diagnosis of thoracic malignancy. When EBUS is combined with endoscopic ultrasound using the same bronchoscope (EUS-B), the diagnostic sensitivity and negative predictive value increase to 84 and 97%, respectively. Endoscopic staging in patients with advanced disease has never been studied, but may inform treatment if a curative SABR approach is being taken.

Methods

This is a multi-centre, prospective, cohort study with two-stage design. In the first stage, 10 patients with oligometastatic NSCLC (lung tumour ± hilar/mediastinal lymphadenopathy) with up to 5 synchronous metastases will be enrolled An additional 19 patients will be enrolled in the second stage if rate of treatment change is greater than 10% in the first stage. Patients will be subject to EBUS or combined modality EBUS/EUS-B to assess bilateral lymph node stations using a N3 to N2 to N1 progression. Primary endpoint is defined as the rate of change to treatment plan including change from SABR to conventional dose radiation, change in mediastinal radiation field, and change from curative to palliative intent treatment.

Discussion

If a curative approach with SABR for oligometastatic disease is being explored, invasive mediastinal staging may guide treatment and prognosis. This study will provide insight into the use of endoscopic mediastinal staging in determining changes in treatment plan of NSCLC. Results will inform the design of future phase II trials.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT04852588. Date of registration: April 19, 2021. Protocol version: 1.1 on December 9, 2021.

Assessment of Toxic Effects and Survival in Treatment Deescalation With Radiotherapy vs Transoral Surgery for HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The ORATOR2 Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

The optimal approach for treatment deescalation in human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs) is unknown.

Objective

To assess a primary radiotherapy (RT) approach vs a primary transoral surgical (TOS) approach in treatment deescalation for HPV-related OPSCC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This international, multicenter, open-label parallel-group phase 2 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 9 tertiary academic cancer centers in Canada and Australia and enrolled patients with T1-T2N0-2 p16-positive OPSCC between February 13, 2018, and November 17, 2020. Patients had up to 3 years of follow-up.

Interventions

Primary RT (consisting of 60 Gy of RT with concurrent weekly cisplatin in node-positive patients) vs TOS and neck dissection (ND) (with adjuvant reduced-dose RT depending on pathologic findings).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was overall survival (OS) compared with a historical control. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life, and toxic effects.

Results

Overall, 61 patients were randomized (30 [49.2%] in the RT arm and 31 [50.8%] in the TOS and ND arm; median [IQR] age, 61.9 [57.2-67.9] years; 8 women [13.6%] and 51 men [86.4%]; 31 [50.8%] never smoked). The trial began in February 2018, and accrual was halted in November 2020 because of excessive toxic effects in the TOS and ND arm. Median follow-up was 17 months (IQR, 15-20 months). For the OS end point, there were 3 death events, all in the TOS and ND arm, including the 2 treatment-related deaths (0.7 and 4.3 months after randomization, respectively) and 1 of myocardial infarction at 8.5 months. There were 4 events for the PFS end point, also all in the TOS and ND arm, which included the 3 mortality events and 1 local recurrence. Thus, the OS and PFS data remained immature. Grade 2 to 5 toxic effects occurred in 20 patients (67%) in the RT arm and 22 (71%) in the TOS and ND arm. Mean (SD) MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory scores at 1 year were similar between arms (85.7 [15.6] and 84.7 [14.5], respectively).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, TOS was associated with an unacceptable risk of grade 5 toxic effects, but patients in both trial arms achieved good swallowing outcomes at 1 year. Long-term follow-up is required to assess OS and PFS outcomes.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03210103.

The Role of Ablative Radiotherapy in Older Adults With Limited Metastatic Disease

For patients with oligometastatic cancer, radiotherapy presents a promising avenue for achieving meaningful symptom relief and durable disease control. Data from recently published and ongoing randomized studies are helping to define the appropriate contexts for effective intervention with stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in the oligometastatic setting. Importantly, older adults represent a significant portion of patients with oligometastatic disease, yet often comprise a minority of patients in clinical trials. Moreover, older adults of the same chronologic age may have variable degrees of fitness and frailty. In this review, we highlight the specific challenges and considerations for the use of radiotherapy for older adults with oligometastatic disease-noting the importance of geriatric assessments in clinical decision-making about the appropriateness of SABR and other metastasis-directed therapies in this population. We then review data from existing trials, including a subset analysis of adverse events and survival estimates among older adults enrolled in the landmark SABR-COMET trial. Finally, we discuss future directions for research, including the need for focused clinical trials in older adult cohorts. Ultimately, a multidisciplinary approach is critical when carefully balancing the potential risks and benefits of this emerging treatment paradigm in the older adult population.